PO STO reconfirm ATP don't consider partly confirm ATP qty

Hi,
I find an issue in our implementation about PO STO using ATP.We user SAP ECC 6.0
Here is the description of issue
1. There is stock = 1000 at (04.03.2010)
2. there is PO STO XXX out to other plant -600 (ATP confirm 600 and remaining cummulative ATP is 400) at (05.03.2010)
3. there is PO STO YYY out to other plant -500 (ATP confirm 400 and remaining cummulative ATP is 0) at (06.03.2010)
here is the issue arrise
4. there is PO STO ZZZ in from other planr 500 at (01.05.2010)
5. User will try to reconfirm ATP for PO STO that partly confirm (see point 3)
the ATP check doesn't consider 400 PCS (partly reconfirm QTP qty /  400 PCS is not available), so the system
suggest ATP at (01.05.2010) for confirmed ATP 500 PCS
What we expect is delivery confirmation in PO XXX (point 3) will be
06.03.2010 confirm 400 (already confirm in point 3)
01.05.2010 confirm 100 (the remaining will take from PO ZZZ in point 4)
The result from system
01.05.2010 confirm 500 (the remaining will take from PO ZZZ in point 4)
in customizing Assign Delivery Type and Checking Rule, we used adoption E (Dialog Box in Case of Undercoverage (Batch: Deliv. Proposal))
why is this happend, why the partly confirm ATP qty is not available for the PO itself?
Any ides is very appreciated, please kndly help.
Best regards,
Freddy Ha
Edited by: Freddy Halim on Mar 4, 2010 9:46 AM

Pls check the following links
ATP check at order level and delivery level
http://www.saptechies.com/what-is-availability-check-how-to-configure-it/

Similar Messages

  • Is Program Global Area considered part of the Oracle Instance?

    Is the memory structure Program Global Area considered part of the Oracle Instance?

    Yes. A program global area (PGA) is a memory region that contains data and control information for a server process. It is a nonshared memory created by Oracle when a server process is started. Access to it is exclusive to that server process and is read and written only by Oracle code acting on behalf of it. The total PGA memory allocated by each server process attached to an Oracle instance is also referred to as the aggregated PGA memory allocated by the instance.
    More here...
    http://download-east.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14220/memory.htm#i14490

  • Service order part confirmation cancellation

    Hi experts,
    Iu2019m facing Issue with service order part confirmation.
    Once we do the part confirmation the parts removes from conformation screen- goods movement overview and goes into the goods movement and if we do the cancel part confirmation it again come to goods movement overview screen again for re part confirmation.
    Here user has done the part confirmation and then cancel part confirmation still these parts are not appearing onto the confirmation overview screen.
    If any body has any thoughts that why it is happening then please let me know.
    Thank you very much in advance for your help.
    Regards,
    Laxmi

    Laxmi
    Can you please clarify the following:
    - What exactly do you mean by "part confirmation"
    - Which TCode are you using to do your "part confirmation"?
    PeteA

  • I paid my order right after the confirmation came in, but i don't get a confirmation that i paid, and i paid it about one and a half week ago, what can i do?

    I paid my order right after the confirmation came in, but i don't get a confirmation that i paid, and i paid it about one and a half week ago, what can i do?

    Download from Download CS5 products
    Install then enter your serial number.

  • ATP not to consider intercompany return STO/PO quantity

    Dear All,
    i have an issue related to ATP check. ATP is activated in DC's and settings are done for storage location and article. while creating intercompany PO, system is considering unrestricted stock and also return PO quantity.
    Pls guide me to how to restrict the system not to consider the return PO quantity.
    Thanks in advance
    Khayoum

    Hi,
    ATP does not happen incase of the Return PO.. This has been documented on the FAQ note 498149 as well..
    br Gabor

  • ATP Check for service parts and procurement scenario

    Dear Experts,
    We're testing CRM service scenario, focusing on the ATP check.
    After running the avaiability check for the service parts in the service order,
    is it posssible to determine the scenario automatically as follows?
    - when the necessary parts items are not available
    -> "Procurement" scenario will be used.
    The corresponding documents such as PO, PR or Reservation will be generated in ERP according to the setting "Define Logistics Scenario for the Procurement of Materials and Services".
    - when the necessary parts items are available in stock
    -> "Material withdrawal" scenario will be used. The items will be withdrawn at the service confirmation.
    From our understanding, the determination of the above scenario is controlled by the item type(ex.SRVP),
    so we expect that the system sets the appropriate item type depending on whether the item is available or not.
    Is there any possible solution for this?(i.e.standard customizing, BAdI etc....)
    Any advice would be higly appreciated.
    Best regards,
    F.T.

    Hi F.T,
    I have worked in Service Order Management Scenario, but not integration of Service Orders for ATP Check. But I found this Presentation which I hope might be somewhat helpful regarding the feasibility of the Business Scenario. You can have look at  the same and will be able to decide if this is the correct way forward or not.
    [Presentation|http://www.google.co.in/#hl=en&biw=1366&bih=548&q=ATPCheckforservicepartsandprocurementscenarioinSAPCRM+++&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=&fp=a254323013e5943b]
    Hope this will help.
    Thanks,
    Samantak.

  • Firefox don't show part of KmlLayer of google maps

    Firefox don't display image (transparent PNG) dynamically generated by Google and inserted by JavaScript but Firebug show it image correctly
    [http://www.flickr.com/photos/60072979@N03/5529127289/ Screenshot]

    This can be a problem with the font that is used to display the text.
    You can use this extension to see which fonts are used for text that is selected (right-click context menu: Show fonts in selection).
    *fontinfo: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/fontinfo/
    You can do a font test to see if you can identify corrupted font(s).
    *http://browserspy.dk/fonts-flash.php?detail=1
    You can try different default fonts and temporarily disable website fonts to test the selected default font.
    *Tools > Options > Content : Fonts & Colors > Advanced
    *[ ] "Allow pages to choose their own fonts, instead of my selections above"

  • SCM Don't consider PrdOrd(R) using Multi-Level/Cover Dependents  Req.

    Hello all.
    My scenary:
    Multi-level product with characteristics. Example: Finished
    Product>Intermediary 1>Intermediary 2>RAW Material.
    In Intermediary2 has a PlOrd(R) scheduled to 28.08.2011.
    In Finished Product there is a Sales Order to 07.07.2011.
    I ran MRP and DepDMD was created. PlOrd was created too because we using
    "Cover Dependent Requirements Immediately".
    When SCM reachs Intermediary 2(Where had a PLOrd(R)) he creates another
    PlOrd.
    All Characteristic is correct(if you compare PlOrd/Planned Order/Sales Order) and if a run MRP only in this level works fine. Only don't work if came from Finished Product to this level.
    Until now, i think the problem is with dates. Possibily SCM creates another order if has capacity and the PlOrd(R) is in future.
    Anyone has any clue of this issue?
    Best Regards.
    Marcelo

    Hi,
    as I can see the ProdOrd is late. so the system will create a new planned order.
    You can prevent this by customizing:
    Maintain Planning Procedures
    Reaction to Events
    Action Carried Out by PP When an Event Occurs
    Cover dependent/stock transfer requirements immediately with existing receipts
    Then the system uses the ProdOrd.
    But if there is no receipt for the dependent demand  the system will never create a new receipt.
    The other option is of course to increase the Alert Threshold for Lateness in the Product Master.
    Then the net requirement will find the late production order and does not propose a new order.
    When you also want to see the peg in the product view enter the same value for lateness in Maximum Lateness of a Receipt field.
    BR Frank
    Edited by: Frank Horlacher on Jul 22, 2011 2:09 PM

  • To consider part of plant available stock

    hello all,
    May I know where in the SPRO configuration in SAP to tell the system what stock type (i.e. UU stock, QI, block, stock-in-transfer, restricted stock, etc) to
    consider or not consider as available plant warehouse stock during MRP run for the Net Requirement Calculation? Thanks.
    Tuffy.

    Dear
    May I know where in the SPRO configuration in SAP to tell the system what stock type (i.e. UU stock, QI, block, stock-in-transfer, restricted stock, etc) to :
    Goto OPPQ-Enter Plant Code -Selecty Available Stock option -Mark the check Box if you want to conside those stock ( Stock in Transit-Block Stock -Unrestricted Stock )  in Net Requirement Calcualtion .Other wise , keep it uncheked if you do not want any stock like Block Stock , in MRP NRC .
    At the same , check if you have OPJJ -Scope of check -for availablity  with various stoks and Inward/outward movements , is correctly in place  .
    Regards
    JH

  • Was using prior to dinner and noticed 60% battery life.  do you have any idea what has happened or what needs to be done on my part?

    My ipad will not turn on, or rechage.  Was using prior to dinner and noticed a 60% battery use.  When plugged to charger it will not turn on.  Any ideas?  Was purchased in April 2013 as a new IPad.

    Frozen or unresponsive iPad
    Resolve these most common issues:
        •    Display remains black or blank
        •    Touch screen not responding
        •    Application unexpectedly closes or freezes
    http://www.apple.com/support/ipad/assistant/ipad/
    iPad Frozen, not responding, how to fix
    http://appletoolbox.com/2012/07/ipad-frozen-not-responding-how-to-fix/
    iPad Frozen? How to Force Quit an App, Reset or Restart Your iPad
    http://ipadacademy.com/2010/11/ipad-frozen-how-to-force-quit-an-app-reset-or-res tart-your-ipad
    Black or Blank Screen on iPad or iPhone
    http://appletoolbox.com/2012/10/black-or-blank-screen-on-ipad-or-iphone/
    What to Do When Your iPad Won't Turn On
    http://ipad.about.com/od/iPad_Troubleshooting/ss/What-To-Do-When-Your-Ipad-Wo-No t-Turn-On.htm
    iOS: Not responding or does not turn on
    http://support.apple.com/kb/TS3281
    iPad: Basic troubleshooting
    http://support.apple.com/kb/TS3274
    Not normal. Take it to an Apple Store for evaluation. You are still covered by Apple's 1-year warranty.
    Make a Genius Bar Reservation
    http://www.apple.com/retail/geniusbar/
     Cheers, Tom

  • I want a job in firefox. Just tell me the things that i'll need to learn to do so. Thanks and please don't consider this to be a joke!

    I learn things quite quickly when it is about the codes.. Thanks... Waiting to be heard :)

    You might want to get started as a volunteer, since that will help you better position yourself in relation to ongoing Mozilla projects, so I'll give you both of these links:
    * https://www.mozilla.org/contribute/
    * https://careers.mozilla.org/

  • How to see Sales order confirmed ATP date in SNP?

    Dear experts,
    The sales orders shown in SNP are in the time bucket corresponding to the requested date by the customer.
    We would like instead to see the sales order in the time bucket corresponding to the ATP confirmed date,
    do you know if this is possible?
    Thanks
    E

    Hello Sandeep,
    I suppose that the sales order you're talking about was just created in the WebClient itself? Normally a sales order is replicated to R/3 when you save it. When you save it the sales order itself becomes locked ('distribution lock'). On the sales order screen, when you press save, is the order locked (are the fields read-only)?
    Normally, just saving the sales order should trigger a replication/distribution to R/3, you don't need any new buttons or anything other fancy
    Regards,
    Joost

  • ATP in SD. Advantage of ATP server & locks for multiple users.

    hi,
    I am working on ATP in SD. We have to design our own ATP calculation logic.
    1. What is advantage of ATP server (logical partition) in SD. does it helps in regulating the calls for ATP calculation.
    2. In standard there is lock for plant & material combination i.e. Material block with quantity transfer.  but here i want blocking to be done on the level material-storage location including one more entity called paper machine which is specific in this ATP calculation.

    Hello Rishi,
    It is quite possible to connect more than one SCM system to ECC technically. Business case will be little specific to customer requirements i.e having existing SCM systems for different business units.
    GATP check can be carried out in different SCM system as you rightly mentioned based on CIF integration model. It doesn't create any issue. We have similar system set-up for internal use.
    Only issue what I see here is, in case of RBATP, if you are using cross location ATP check, if will not give you desired results. Second issue will be for planned supply components, if material is planned in separate SCM system.
    Such system set-up works fine when you are having isolated materials and location to plan and GATP.
    Regards,
    Dinesh Goyal

  • Capacity Evaluation: CM01 does not consider partially confirmed Prod Ord

    Dear Gurus,
    I was doing a test for CM01 and I found out that the Production Order with partial confirmation/delivery is still being considered as a full quantity in CM01 pegged requirements. For example is below:
    Prod Ord Qty is: 1500
    Partial Confirmation made: 500
    Now in CM01 it still shows 1500, I thought it should only be 1000. Reason is this order is backlog from last week thus I only want the system to consider the 1000 open quantity and not the whole 1500. Is it achievable in CM01?
    Thanks,
    Raymond

    Hi,
    but this Production Order is still open with 1000 PC. I will still need to process the 1000 remaining quantity out of 1500 and in CM01 I would like it to show on 1000 PC instead of 1500 PC.
    Another thing is for example, Im on the middle of the week, my available capacity is reduced and I also have already partially confirmed the production order. Then when I execute CM01, it will show capacity overload eventhough the open quantity is also decreased.
    So my concern is instead of Production Order Base Quantity, can the system check the production Order Open Quantity?
    Thanks,
    Raymond

  • ATP - Check in STO

    We will create STO PO for our inter-plant transfer. We have plant delivery time of 100 DAYS. we don't want the system to get confirmed any qty while creating the order. We are doing delivery through SD route. Only ATP check needs to turned on while doing delivery creation only . How to get this Function ? Any input will be highly appreciated
    Thanks
    JJ

    Pls check the following links
    ATP check at order level and delivery level
    http://www.saptechies.com/what-is-availability-check-how-to-configure-it/

Maybe you are looking for