PO unreleased after SES

Hi Experts,
I created service PO> Released> Did SES.
I checked' Delivery Completed' .While saving PO system is showing 'Release Possible' indicator under release strategy.PO history also exists.
So, I want to know is it standard behavior of system that even after SES system has allowed to cancel release of PO.
Any standard settings required to prevent it. Kindly suggest . Thanks
Regards
Saurabh

Hi,
  The PO release procedure concept is introduced to have a control / approval over the PO before transmitting to vendor. Once its released, then you can do the succeeding activities and the release may cancel / retrigger if you change any relevant fields in PO. However, you can decide whether the PO is allowed to change after release or NOT, while configuring the release procedure.
   The configuration is related to the changeability indicator assigned to the release indicator. If you do not want to change the PO after release, you may maintain the release indicator as 1 (can not be changed) in the Path- OLME- Purchase Order- Release Procedure for Purchase Orders - Define Release Procedure for Purchase Orders - Release indicator.
Regards,
AKPT

Similar Messages

  • PO going in Unrelease after assigning Advance payment into payment tab

    Hello Guys,
    I have a issues regarding purchase order's release strategy. when i assing advance payment categoy into Payment Processing tab into header tab of purchase order and save . purchase order goes to unrelease.
    it should not be go into unrelease.
    kindly guide me regarding this issues.
    with regards,
    sanjay kumar

    PO will goes to unreleased, only when the header amount will increase.
    Check the same in your case.

  • Change Service Based IV after SES

    Dear experts,
    I have a problem where the PO for item cat "D" is not tick service based iv. SES has been done. Eventhough we have revoke the SES, the field service based iv still unavailable for changes.
    Could anyone assist me how to go about.
    Thanks in advance,

    Thanks everyone.
    The service based iv was not ticked during conversion (the upload program is to copy the existing PO in SAP), somehow the upload program didn't tick the service based iv eventhough the indicator is ticked in the vendor master and the existing PO.
    I've proposed the same solution as you guys proposed (to delete the existing line and create new line). I would conclude that there is no other better solution than above solution.
    Thanks again.

  • Service PO is getting unreleased after Service entry creation

    Hi All,
    In our scenario user is able to unrelease service purchase order even if a valid service entry exist for it in system.
    I want to know that is there any system message available for restricting the user from unreleasing a po if valid service entry exist.
    Thanks & Regards
    Rashid

    Hi,
    Make changability option as "1" - Cannot be changed in release indicator setting of PO release strategy.
    Then system won't allow you to revoke PO.
    Path  SPRO > MM > PURCHASING > PURCHASE ORDER > RELASE PROCEDURE > DEFINE RELEASE PROCEDURE.
    Regards,
    Sandesh Sawant

  • MDS misconfiguration and exceptions in SES right after installation

    After installing SES, the search works fine, but I do have often in log files MDS related exceptions, like:
    oracle.wsm.mds.MDSAccessException: WSM-04509 : cannot initialize the connection to the data store
    Caused By: oracle.mds.config.MDSConfigurationException: MDS-01330: unable to load MDS configuration document
    weblogic.common.resourcepool.ResourceDeadException: 0:weblogic.common.ResourceException: Could not create pool connection. The DBMS driver exception was: Unknown host specified
    Also the weblogic console shows critical error at JDBC: Connection Pool Name = null:null:mds-owsm, State = Unhealthy
    Obviously the mds-owsm data source is incorrectly set after installation (URL=jdbc:oracle:thin:@dbhost.example.com:1521/orcl)
    Is the mds-owsm data source necessary? (SES is working fine)
    If not, how can I delete it? (there is no Fusion Middleware Control nor WLST)
    If the mds-owsm is necessary, can I configure it to the same SES DB? (the EnterpriseSearchDS data source)
    The problem appears right after SES installation and on all of our instances (testing, staging, production).
    Thanks,
    Lukas
    Edited by: user13277662 on 28.12.2011 3:44

    Thank you. I've followed the instructions in release notes for the bug 9268418.
    It did not help. Most probably because the user 'dev_mds' does not exist in the database.
    I tried to add manually the user 'dev_mds'. Than the status in the console became green.
    But the exceptions are still in the log. Probably the reason is the metadata tables are missing in the DB.
    Lukas

  • UCM ACL and SES search

    Hi All,
    i know may be it not the correct forum to ask this question but i need some guidance.
    we have ACL enabled security architecture in UCM and the SG where ACL is active is 'Restricted'.
    so two SG Restricted and Unrestricted.
    Now after SES setup is done we are not able to find any content which are in SG 'Restricted' and where any of ACL field is filled in SES search.
    let me put it in this way:
    content - A
    SG - Restricted
    ACL (Role Access List) - contributor(RW) //we have one AD group contributor with user lets say user1 and user2.
    content - B
    SG - Restricted
    ACL (Role Access List )- empty
    so the second content is not having any thing in any of ACL field.
    now the B content is visible in SES search for required users but content A is not visible to user 1 or user2.
    UCM search works fine and behave as required.
    i am not the one who did the SES configuration in Team but now ball is in my court as i implemented the ACL in UCM.
    please help me and provide some better understanding.
    -thanks

    Hi David,
    we are not using accounts, and as mentioned earlier we have classification of content at SG level as
    Restricted and Unrestricted which determine ACL is active or not (in specialAuthGroup i made entry only for Restricted ).
    Most of the content will be in Unrestricted SG but few as per use cases will be in Restricted SG and will be assigned certain enterprise role in Role access list of ACL.
    this is our security architecture for UCM.
    now behavior of SES is that it able to search all content from Unrestricted SG and those content from Restricted SG where all ACL fields are empty.
    if any of ACL fields have value for any Restricted SG group content SES is not able to find that content even for Admin user.
    UCM's OOTB (in UCM console) search is working fine i.e. if user has access in ACL + SG he/she is able to search content.
    hope i made my point clear.
    thanks

  • SES Account determination

    Hi Experts,
    After accepting the Service Entry Sheet, what are the documents created and what accounting entries are triggered.
    Please help.
    Thanks
    Monan

    Hi,
    After SES acceptance, For SES, there is no accounting entry.....U are just accepting the services.
    But there is material document number & FI document generated with each SES,
    Here acct entreis as
    G/L given for that Service  - Dr
    GR/IR clearing  - Cr
    Hope Help U !
    Regards,
    Pardeep Malik

  • How do remove commitment value in the PO ? any SAP note avl?

    Hi,
    Project (WBS)releated service PO (Account assignment category P and Item category D), in which SES,GR,IR have been completed for entire Project services for the year 2005,PO history also updatd for SES, GR,IR in the 2005 only.But Now system is showing still commitment value in the PO for the year 2009?.
    Henece how do remove the inconsistency of the  commitment value in the PO for the year 2009?. (i.e value is comming from COOI table entry).Is there any SAP NOTEs are available for this case?
    Note:
    But this case no PR has been refered in the PO. PO has been directly created, and PO  QTY,Value changes have not been done after SES,GR,IR completion.
    But still system  commitment value is showing in the PO for the year 2009, so HOW do remove the value?
    i am looking suitable answers.
    Regards,
    kumar

    Hi,
    Pre-requisites for a commitment update are:                                                                               
    o  In transaction OKKP, the commitment management indicator must be              
           active for the given controlling area in the current fiscal year.                                                                               
    The controlling area is the highest organizational unit in Controlling,              
    however this area is missing from the accounting data of the PO.                                                                               
    o  The accounting objects must be active for commitments:                                                                               
    -  Work orders: The commitment management indicator must be set               
              in transaction KOT2 for the given order type.                                                                               
    -  Cost centers: In transaction KS02, in register "Control", the              
              commitment update indicator must NOT be set.                                                                               
    -  Projects: see note 47992                                                                               
    o  In transaction CUNI, the unit of measurements used at item level              
           must be set to value based commitment.                                                                               
    Please check the following notes 152571, 634298, 459509 and            
    772206 carefully and also 165823. 
    Please check also if the "delivery complete" indicator is set in the PO item (see note 735404).
    Usually for service POs the "Delivery completed" indicator will be   
    hidden and this indicator is fully controlled by the "final entry    
    sheet" indicator in ML81N. You must allow to set this indicator trough a field selection customizing for your PO item.
    Regards,
    Edit

  • Short text of service entry sheet in accounting document

    Hi All
    I want shor text (ESSR - TXZ01) of service entry sheet to get populated in the text field(BSEG - SGTXT) of corresponding accounting document of service entry sheet created against GR document.
    Please suggest how  can I achieve the same.Is there any SAP note for the same?
    Regards
    Satish Kumar
    Edited by: satish kumar on May 28, 2010 3:33 PM

    Hi Satish,
    BSEG - SGTXT gets the values from MSEG-SGTXT (material document after SES acceptance).
                                                                                    The service entry sheet header text is only copied into MSEG-SGTXT if            
    you do NOT use Srv-Based Invoice Verification:  the field EKPO-LEBRE          
    in the PO item is NOT checked.
    Otherwise the text from the service lines will be overtaken into   MSEG-SGTXT.  
    Please make tests.
    Regards,
    Edit

  • Issue with Service Entry Sheet Acceptance

    Hello,
    I am running into an issue when accepting service entry sheets. Here is the scenario
    I created 6 service master records and assigned unique valuation classes to each one of them . Each valuation class determines unique G/L account in Inventory postings ( Tcode OBYC-GBB)
    I am creating a service entry sheet for these 6 service master records against a PO and accepting with different dollar value for each of the records. When I check PO, I can see only one line in Material document being generated with a cumulative dollar value from 6 records being posted to G/L in the PO  ( I was expecting one Material doc with 6 different lines with postings made to individual G/L account mentioned in the Config)
    What am I missing in the config/data setup which is triggering postings to account in PO instead of individual accounts from OBYC setup
    Any inputs appreciated
    Thanks

    Hi,
    For service procurement( which is without material master) ,the account determination for service or without material master,the G/L accounts are assigned with service group/material group where you defined material group in OMSF and then material group link it with valuation class in OMQW.
    In OBYC ,_no valuation class needed for Service  with WRX key_.Use t.code: OBYC, Enter Chart of Account. Now & Double click WRX,, in next screen ,click RULES in application tool bar & then in next screen do not select check box of valuation class & save.
    Now come back & Use t.code: OBYC, Enter Chart of Account, Double click WRX & enter your G/L account ONLY for GR/IR Clearing(for service)save.
    The accounting entries are for service procurement are:
    The accounting entry after SES released
    *Service Procurement(KBS): Dr
    GR/IR Clearing-service( WRX): Cr
    The accounting entry after MIRO posting:
    GR/IR Clearing(service): Dr
    Vendor Account: Cr
    The *Service Procurement account triggered during SES released bcuz of the same G/L account you entered during creation of PO/SO with cost center( check PO account assignment TAB in PO item details)
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • PO header and item changes through ME23N

    Hello Experts,
    I found a PO which shows the change logs with transaction ME23N. Please help me in understanding how it can be possible.
    screen shot attached.
    Regards
    Saurabh

    Jus to add , I created service PO> Released> Did SES.
    I checked' Delivery Completed' .While saving PO system is showing 'Release Possible' indicator under release strategy.PO history also exists.
    So, I want to know is it standard behavior of system that even after SES system has allowed to cancel release of PO.
    Any standard settings required to prevent it. Kindly suggest . Thanks
    Regards
    Saurabh

  • Valuation Class in Service Master

    Hi,
    Can someone please tell how can I create a Valuation Class for Service Master and assign G/L Account to it, so that the G/L Account is automatically picked up while creating the Service PO for that Service No.
    Also how can I check the FI Doc created after  posting the Service Entry Sheet through ML81N? It did not show any FI Document when checked the FI Documents section after clicking on the Service Entry Sheet Doc # appearing in PO History tab.
    Thanks,
    Lucky

    Hi,
    System is right & posting to KBS Transaction Event key.
    The accounting entry after SES released
    Service Procurement(KBS): Dr
    GR/IR Clearing-service( WRX): Cr
    The accounting entry after MIRO posting:
    GR/IR Clearing(service): Dr
    Vendor Account: Cr
    If GR No-valuated selected in PO, then no accounting entry in SES released but accounting document wil create during MIRO posting & Entry will be : Service Procurement: Dr & Vendor Account: Cr
    NOTE: No assignment done  in OBYC for KBS, its on OKB9 t.code & Control is on OMJJ & value string. Also check SAP Note: 364570
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Service Entry sheet - Delivery Charges

    Hi Experts,
    As per SAP note 381030 Delivery charges are not supported for service PO (item category - 'D')
    and Blanket PO (Item category - 'B').
    But one of the client which is running on ECC 6.0,  I am able to see accounting entries
    for delivery charges to frieght account after SES acceptance.
    How could it be possible? Have you come across such cases?
    Please throw your valuable inputs
    Regards,
    Partha

    Hi,
    1st one need to understand why to use/maintain Delivery charges in service procurement!
    When Vendor provides service to you, you use service master(AC03), create service PO & maintain service tax in the service PO, then SES & invoice verification & finally payment to vendor.
    When you are providing service to your customer , you can use material type DIEN & create material( MM01) for service & try to use/maintain tax indicator. Then create sales order with service material created with material type DIEN & then bill to customer for service provided by creating a Bill & the receive the payment customer.
    In service procurement, you need to create a service master(AC03) , you need to enter valuation class & in OBYC, you just assign need to assign GR/IR Clearing (service) with G/L account only & remember that no valuation class for service assignment requires here in OBYC for service.
    Service order or purchase order created with Acc. assignment ' K' and Item category 'D' , the system automatically pick UOM is "1" activity unit in Item Overview and in item details you need to maintain the service master ,UOM, quantity & price /unit and then G/L account with cost center .
    During SES(ML8N), you are just recognizing vendor performed service where you can have cost object(cost center) with service master with quantity etc.....No FI document created after creating/maintaining the Service Entry Sheet in ML81N but once you release the Service Entry Sheet, then only FI document created.
    If GR valuated for service procurement: You will have accounting entries:
    During SES release:
    Service account: Dr
    GR/IR(service) :Cr
    During IR
    GR/IR(service) :Dr
    Vendor A/C: Cr
    Service tax A/C: Dr
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • VALUE IN PO HISTORY OF SERVICE ENTRY SHEET EXIST EVEN AFTER DELETION OF SES

    Respected All,
    My client has prepared a down payment request , prepared a service purchase order against that vendor, created service entry sheet.
    Later on he came to know that the qty he has entered is wrong ,so  he reversed all the goods receipt(done 102 Mvt) , deleted the service entry sheet and now trying to create new SES against the same line through ML81N.
    But the Qty column after selection of services is coming blank, i have checked the po history, in that the GR Qty and value is zero and service Qty is zero but service value and down payment column still contains the value, though we have reversed the service entry seet.
    please guide me what to do to reflect the qty part in ML81N again.
    Thanks and Regards
    Abhay Mahodaya

    can you see the material document with reverse movement ( 102 ) ,corresponding to your cancelation of SE sheet in the P.O history tab?
    also check whether the 'actual quantity' in the Service entry extreme right column shows zero.
    check in the deleted SE sheet history tab 'change document' button whether the last row change mentioned is setting deletion indicator

  • Issues with iphoto after hard drive failure - message "library was created with an unreleased version of iphoto"

    I have a late model 2008 13" MacBook that was running OS X 10.5.8 when the hard drive failed 2 weeks ago when I was traveling in Canada. I found a Mac repair centre and they replaced my 250GB with a 500GB hard drive and transferred my data.  (Yeah!!!) I'm now on OS X 10.6.8 (which is great as I guess I should be able to sync my iphone on IOS 7 with my laptop again.... but I digress...)
    I haven't been able to access my photos as I get the message "The photo library was created with an unreleased version of iphoto. Please quit and upgrade this photo library by opening it in iphoto 2 or iphoto 4" when I try to open it.  I can see my photos when I look on Photo Browser in Mail so that's good - they are here...  I looked through past messages with this problem and saw that the advise was to download iphoto Library Manager.  I want to be certain I don't mess anything up so the questions are:
    1. What version of iphoto Library Manager should I download - I had OS X 10.5.8 and my iphoto library was ... (sorry - can't find out what it was, guess it's now 7.1.5)
    2. What do I do after I've downloaded IPLM?
    Many thanks ahead of time for any assistance

    I backed up my iPhoto Library to an external drive even though it looked way to small to hold all my photos.  I have tried several times to open iPhoto whilst depressing the option and command keys but get the same message again:
    "The photo library was created with an unreleased version of iphoto. Please quit and upgrade this photo library by opening it in iphoto 2 or iphoto 4"  Behind this, the little wheel is turning and it says "Loading Photos" (but it doesn't).
    I've got to access these photos for a project deadline that's looming so any help would be really appreciated.

Maybe you are looking for