PO Value Limits

Hi all,
Does any of you have any documentation, information about PO limit values defined in the extended attributes of the PPOMA?
How this functionality works in a standalone scenario?
Thanks,
Ana

Hi,
Please read following threads :
https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=326274&messageID=1191608
https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=326274&messageID=2330254
Kind regards,
Yann

Similar Messages

To change the approval limit for Extended attribute PO Value limits

Hi,
We are on SRM 4.0, in PPOMA_BBP for a local purchasing organisation we want to change the approval limit let us say from 100 to 50 but the system is presenting this field as non editable( In stabdard values sub screen)
In Extended attribute tab in organisation structure after selecting the PO Value limits in SRM 4.0 we see two sub screens
a) Standard values
b) Local values
We want to change the approval limit in standard values sub screen from 1000 to 500, which system is presenting as noneditable.
Regrds
Vivek

Hi
Refer these links.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/5a/af5efc85d011d2b42d006094b92d37/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/8b/4fa9585db211d2b404006094b92d37/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/fa/fa7d3cb7f58910e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/7f/0fea380bfe6161e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
Incase it does not helps, pls let me know.
Regards
- Atul

PO value limits - approval limits local vs standard

Hi Experts,
I have the following problem: for reporting purposes I need to identify an user approval limit.
Looking in the organizational structure --> extended attributes --> Po value limits I find two values:
- Standard values - Approval limit;
- Local values - approval limit.
What is the difference between them? Which one should I use?
Other question is, how can I get this information? I am going to table HRP5503 and I can only get the local values.
Thanks in advance,
Francisco

Any help on the above query is appreciated. I am facing the somewhat similar issue. For some of the users standard value field is there and for others its not present under PO value limits(only local value field available). Can someone tell me the root cause for this? Is this role dependent ??

Is it possible to spread the commitment on a value limited blanket order?

Hi - I want to create a value limited blanket order, e.g. over the next 12 months I expect to spend about £12,000 with a service provider.
I will be billed at monthly intervals and the amount will vary from month to month but it will never be more than 2k in any one month (so it could be say £150 in moth one and £1,500 in month two ).
At the moment when I look at my planning reports then full £12k commitment appears in the period that is associated with the default delivery date on the PO.
There are no deliveries as such and GR is not required for this process - I just want to be able to book the invoice as and when it comes in but check the monthly value does not exceed the 2k limit and that overall the annual limit of £12 is not exceeded.
So is it possible for me to spread the commitment so that it appears as 12 equal instalments on 1k for each period of the PO validity period?
Ideally I don't want to have to revisit the PO and massage it with each incoming invoice.
Any thoughts much appreciated.
Regards.

Scroll down and you will see how you modify the form action to go to a page.
http://forums.adobe.com/docs/DOC-2363

Value Limitation on Hyperion Planning Supporting Detail

Hi All,
Is there a way how to set the limitation on Supporting Detail ? I try to input the 9.500.000.000 as the value in my Supporting Detail but it always changes to 9.223.372.036.854776, it's like the total in the Supporting Detail can't be more than 9.223.372.036.854776.
I'm using Planning 11.1.2.2.304 anyway
Really appreciate if anyone can help me
Thanks !

If you look at the planning table the value is defined as Float, but however the number you are looking at is the max of Long (not sure why it is, however I think it has to deal with 16 significant digit rule)
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/constant-values.html#java.lang.Integer.MAX_VALUE
Regards
Celvin

Crystal Report XI: Parameter Field Dynamic Default Values Limitation?

Post Author: Elie_123
CA Forum: General
Hi,Using Crystal Report XI.I have a parameter field with Dynamic values that Queries the company field of an SQL Database.I have around 3500 companies in my DB. But when running my report (Using Crystal), only the first 1300 companies are being displayed in my pick list.I need to see the whole 3500 records. Any idea how to fix that?regards

Post Author: V361
CA Forum: General
Check out this link
http://technicalsupport.businessobjects.com/KanisaSupportSite/search.do;jsessionid=2DA9FC849962062053477D134AAAA672?cmd=displayKC&docType=kc&externalId=c2017238&sliceId=&dialogID=5618074&stateId=1%200%205616180

Dimension values limited to 1000

BI Beans return an error when my dimension values are upper 1000.
Is this an exception of BI Beans?
How can I manage that dimensions that have over 1000 unique values?
Regards,
Xochitl

Searching our bug database, there does seem to be an issue where a list of more than 1000 dimension members is passed to OLAPI to create a SQL query. This does not imply that dimensions cannot be greater than 100 values, only that when parsing a dimension list there should be less than 1000 values in the list. Typically this would in fact be the case, as you would not want to return 1000 dimension members to a user. It is more normal that a user would start at a high or intermediate level and drill down to lower levels of details. Hence, each drill is likely to return a subset of the dimension values which would normally be less than 1000 values. So the workaround is to ensure that each dimension member has less than 1000 children when drilling to the next level down the hierarchy.
The bug reference for this is 2973142 and this issue is fully resolved in 10g. It seems there may be a backport for 9.2.0.4.1 on Solaris 64Bit, Patch 3001943.
No other platform ports are available at this time.
Business Intelligence Beans Product Management Team
Oracle Corporation

Error code on iplanet Fasttrack: "warning ( 1096): RqThrottle value limited to 16 in this server". this error leads to the next"suspend httpd service" ?? OS is W2K Prof.

Hi,
Hope this is a webserver. To get a better & faster response, please post in the webserver forums
Regards
Ganesh .R
Developer Technical Support
Sun Microsystems
http://www.sun.com/developers/support

Report for Qty Contract and Value Contract with PO release exceeding limits

Hi All,
Is there a std report in SAP that the users can use to view Qty and Val Contracts that has exceed in Qty (in case of Qty Contracts) or Val (in case of Val Contracts) ?
Thanks in advance!

hi Duke,
If thinking logically, then there is no report for the same..this may be because you enter the qty or value limits in the contract doc itself....So, when you make the PO for the same, and if the qty or value exceeds the system automatically provides the message..stating that the qty or value has exceeded....
So, there is no report for the same...
Hope it helps...
Regards
Priyanka.P

Free goods by header net value not Quantity

Regards
My client wants to make a sales promotions as the free goods SD. The difference is that free goods should not be given by the bought quantity of certain material, they should be given from the header net value of an order.
For example:
If a customer have an order with header net value of 100$ from only materials that has certain material pricin group, it should receive one free good.( All the materials in the order have the same material pricing group)
If a customer have an order with header net value of 200$ from only materials that has certain material pricin group, it should receive two free goods.
If there are ways to make this happen please let me know i would really appreciate it.
Thanks
Edited by: Ronald Caroli on Feb 13, 2008 9:13 PM

Hi ronald,
The userexit option is very tough to do.
You are using a right userexit, but how are you coding it? Whats your design and flow?
The BDC are programmable recordings of a standard transaction. Hence you will be able to record the way in which you add a line item to sales order. Ths recording is automatically converted into lines of code by SAP. Then you insert your checks and balances between these lines of code to make it behave the way you want the sequence of transactions to work.
My thought was to make a recording of adding a new line item, in change sales order transaction(va02), with item category as Free of Charge(FOC). Then in the code, I wanted to check for material pricing group, if found correct, then would go finding the net value of sales document. If the value is above the limit, calculate the target quantity. Then follow the rest of the recording and add a new line with FOC as item category.
But this was a seperate transaction, which could be applied seperately and not to be done automatically in sales order. This was becuase say if you switch off the promotion tomorrow, then you will not have to worry abt removing the same functionality from sales order, you just need to de-activate the transaction.
Then there would be issues of doing hardcoding the net value limits, free good quantity in the user exit which is not at all recommended.
Hope this helps.
Abhishek

Expected Value and Overall limit value usage.

Hi Sap Gurus,
if the frame work order we have these 2 field Expected value and overall limit field value to be filled,
and the system allows Invoice (or GR) up to the maximum of the overall limit value. and only if the value entered crosses the overall limit value the system issues a Error Message ( which is agreeable)
but the logical requirement is that, if the value crosses the Expected value limit the system should display a warning message, indicating that the value has crossed the expected value.
is there any config or note to be applied to get this funtionality.
Thanks and regards
Priya S

Hi,
Please refer to the Online documentation:
         Material Management
         -> External Services Management
            -> Procurement of Services: Processes
               -> Accelerated and Simplified Processes
                  -> Use of Value Limits (for Unplanned Services)
Inside this documentation, it is stated that there is a variety of
limits (combinations) to be used:-
- Overall limit only
- Overall limit and limit on services covered by contract item(s)
- Overall limit, limit on services covered by contract item(s),
- and other limit
- Overall limit and other limit
- Overall limit on services from model specifications or standard
    service catalog
- Expected value
The expected value is used in the update of the
PO item value and this is the value used in the release strategy.
Here is the f1 help:
Expected value - ESUH-COMMITMENT
Value that the unplanned services (or the materials) covered by this
item are not expected to exceed.
Use
If you are working with the release (approval) procedure for purchasing
documents, this value serves as the basis for a release strategy applied
to this document.
If you tick 'No limit',you don't need to enter 'Overall limit',but must
enter 'Expected value'.Because 'Expected value' will affect the release
strategy. Please read the note 440601 connected to this.
Concerning the variability of actual cost of a purchase order,
expected value means that the unplanned services (or materials)
covered by this item are not EXPECTED to exceed.
It is not mandatory that it has the same value like total limit value.
Expected value can exceed, it is used for comparison with total limit
value in cost control.
Expected value can also be combined with unlimited total limit in a
purchasing document.
Regards,
Edit

Reporting: Multi-value select prompt

Multi-value select prompt: Need to verify if there is a limit to the number of items/size in a drop down list or if there are selected value limitations.

Hi Rick,
To clarify, which type of parameters will you be using, Dynamic or Static? If you're using dynamic parameters (LOV's or Business Views) there is a limit on the display values, but I am not aware of a limit on the input limit for multiple values.
If you're using a dynamic parameter which will use an LOV or Business View the registry key value to increase can be found:
HKLM > Software > Business Objects > Crystal Report > Database Options > LOV
MaxRowSetRecords
Regards,
Wallie

Payment block for vendor based on value.

Hi Friends,
Is there any way to set like,
If the payment is >$5000 for vendor 100100, Invoice must be blocked for payment automatically.
If the payment is <$5000, Invoice should not block for payment.
Best regards,
RAMAN.

Hi,
Unfortunately this is not standard SAP.
There are Vendor specific tolerances but these are not set upper value limits, they are tolerance ranges for value and so do not do what you are asking for.
There are also value tolerances that can be used to block all invoices over a certain value, but these are not vendor specific.
So if you REALLY MUST have this then a user exit or modification would be required.
Or set the payment block on the vendor and block ALL invoices and then release the lower value ones (manually) and leave the others blocked until you want them to be paid?
Sorry that there is no SAP solution for this via config.
Steve B

Linking Consignment Settlement (MRKO) with Value Contract

Hi Guys,
We are trying to set up Consignment stock functionality in our company. We have successfully configured and tested it but there is only one problem, we want to link this consignment functionality with and Outline agreement (Value Contract to be exact), so that every time we do a settlement using MRKO, the invoice value is deducted from the total value of the contract. My first question is
1 - Can we link consignment settlement (MRKO) and Value Contract in such a way that each time we run consignment settlement using MRKO , the open/ remaining value of the Value Contract is decreased by the invoice amount. If YES, then how can we do it (Please mention the steps if possible)
2- If NO, then what is the way to achieve above task, is their workaround for it ??

Normally we do not get into consignment arrangements with supplier with value limites or qty limites. It defeats the purpose of consignment, where idea is to reduce inventory carrying cost and yet have full availability of stock.
Also, you will provide a dedicated space in your premises to your Supplier and hence to limit him with total value of your consumption is difficult to achieve. Even if you make some enhancement in system to achieve it, on shop floor how can you control it, if you have inventory open for use? If you have negotiated with consignment vendor based on value, I am sure Vendor will not replenish any inventory once he thinks that overall value limit is breached and hence suddenly one day, without any indicators to you, you will run out of those components which you do not have in your inventory, nor in your consignment inventory.
You can implement any exit, which may stop you post the transaction in system, but I believe if you are entering into such contracts with your supplier, you may need to have some sort of notification once you are close approaching the overall limit, to either re-negotiate the contract or to have those components ordered for your inventory directly to ensure availability of stock.
Regards,
Dakshesh

Service entry Value

Hi,
We have a scenario where in user has done service entrysheet for excess value than PO.There is a SAP standard validation exist in the system for Quantity but not on value.
In our case,
First user has created a service PO with one serciace line for qty as 1 and gross price as Rs. 1500 each , for amount 7500.
user has done service entry sheet for the 0.5 Quantity. After creating service entry sheet user has changed PO by value
Gross price( changed to 12500 from 15000). This way user could create the service entry of amount 6250 with quantity 0.5
that is he is able to create service entry more than the service PO by amount 1250.
We want to restrict users from creating service entry sheet more than PO value.Please suggest if anybody has done any kind of development to meet this requirement.
Thanks & Regards,
Edited by: Mitesh Chaudhary on May 12, 2010 11:23 AM

Hi,
the price change in the entry sheet should be not allowed, do not set the price change indicator to X (ESLL-PRS_CHG) in the entry sheet.
If the indicator "Price change during entry" has been set in the service line of the underlying purchase order, you can change the prices of planned services adopted from the purchase order in the entry sheet.
It is also possible to change the prices of unplanned services referencing a contract in the entry sheet if the indicator "Price change during entry allowed" has been set in the contract value limits of the purchase order.
In transaction OLMSRV, Define Screen Layout, PO, you could set the field Price chgble. at service entry to hidden.
Regards,
Edit

PO Value Limits

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for