POE Line Cards for 6807 Core Switch

Folks,
Could you please advise, if there is any line card specific for 6807 Core Switch , that provides 10/100/1000 POE Ethernet . I have only seen in datasheet as non - poe ..
Thanks for your support.
Regards,
Aaron

Hi Aaron,
If you need a switch that can provide gigabit ethernet POE, you might want to consider having a stand alone switch, like Cisco Catalyst 3560. Kindly refer to this link for more information.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/catalyst-3560-series-switches/product_data_sheet09186a00801f3d7d.html
Hope this helps!
Kind regards.

Similar Messages

Dedicated supervisor engine slot numbers for cisco core switches

I want to know why there is Dedicated supervisor engine slot numbers in core switch.
Feature
Cisco Catalyst WS-C4503-E Chassis
Cisco Catalyst WS-C4506-E Chassis
Cisco Catalyst WS-C4507R+E Chassis
Cisco Catalyst WS-C4510R+E Chassis
Dedicated supervisor engine slot numbers
1
1
3 and 4
5 and 6
Please make it clear why its dedicated slot alocate for supervisor engine slot

Hi,
I think the reason behind a dedicated slots for Supervisors of 4500/6500 chasis is due to the architectural constraints.
For example the Sup 720 in 6500 has 18 fabric channel (18 connections to the fabric), the line cards have only 1/2 fabric channels depending on their version. So if you have to make a supervisor independent of the slot you need to have 18 backplane fabric channels in each slot of the chassis for the SUP to work in all slots as compared to 1/2 backplane fabric channels per slot as we have right now for the line cards. Almost same should go for the 4500. And this might come across as an architectural constraint. This is the best explanation i can think of.
Thanks
"Please rate the post if found useful"

Modules supported on WS-X6704-10GE line card for WS-C6509-E

We are planning to expand the local network and looking to add 10G line cards on our WS-6509-E. The confusion is over the types of optic modules that these cards support.
Can anyone advice if these line cards support all these three - namely XENPAK, X2 & SFP Plus?
Thanks

What is the difference between these supervisor (VS-S720-10G-3C or VS-S720-10G-3CXL)
See the "XL" at the end of the part number? If you get the regular (no "XL"), you'll only get 256k IPv4 routes. The "XL" will allow you up to 1 million IPv4 routes.
Is these modules will work with c6509E and these supervisor (VS-S720-10G-3C or VS-S720-10G-3CXL)
Yes and no. Yes, these supervisor cards will work on the current chassis you've got. But if you plan to use VSS, then your 6704 line card is incompatible with VSS.
Another thing, don't waste your money. Firstly, the price of the Sup720 is exactly the same as the price of the newer (and more powerful) Sup2T supervisor card.
And lastly, rumours has it that the 6500 chassis is in it's "last gasp". Personally, I'm waiting for Cisco to announce the EoS/EoL.
If you want to future-proof your investment, the potential replacement of the venerable 6500E is the 6880-X/6807-X.

WAAS 4 port in-line card for resilient WAN links

I know tha...
" If a power, hardware, or unrecoverable software failure occurs, the network adapter automatically begins operating in bypass mode, where all traffic is mechanically bridged between the LAN and WAN interfaces in each group"
But obviously putting both WAN links through a singel NIC/chassis raises concerns about a single point of failure. Has anyone experienced failure scenarios whereby the NIC fails to bridge?
Regards,
JonB

Hi Jon,
The mechanical bypass relays are independent for each inline group. I am not aware of any cases where the bypass functionality has not worked properly for the defined failure types.
Regards,
Zach

Why XL line cards required for OTV?

According to Cisco's website, there are specific types of line cards required to support OTV on N7K (N7K-8 port 10GbE with XL options, or N7K-48 port 10/100/1000 Module with XL option).
Q1: Do I have to use the physical ports on those line cards to make OTV related interfaces? Can I use logical interfaces, and use physical ports on those line cards for non-OTV connectivity, such as used as a layer 2 access port?
Q2: Since OTV feature is enabled globally, why the requirements for specific line cards in the first place? What the features/services provided by the line cards for OTV operations?
Thanks.

Has anyone seen design docs that suggest using 10-Gig ports for the OTV interfaces? I know the Q&A indicates support for all M1 line cards (not F1 or F2), but I'm wondering if there's any clearly defined design reason for not using the 1-G line cards for this (such as the N7K-M148GS-11L).
I'm basically asking if it would be recommended (for a system with no additional open 10-G ports) to purchase another 10-G blade (such as the N7K-M108X2-12L at $27), or could we do the job with spare ports on an existing 1-G card? I've been through several docs, and while none of them indicate 10-G connectivity is mandatory, I'm hoping for a reason why Cisco might be pushing/recommending this for any size of OTV deployment.
Thank you.

Catalyst 4510R-E and Line Card Options

I am considering purchasing the following 4510R-E switch items for installation in a new building that will go online shortly.
a) 1 x 4510R-E Chassis (WS-C4510R-E)
b) 1 x Supervisor Engine 6-E (WS-X45-Sup6E)
c) 1 x 24-Port 10/100/1000 Module (WS-X4424-GB-RJ45)
d) 6 x 48-Port PoE 803.3af 10/100 (WS-X4248-RJ45V)
We are purchasing classic line cards for item c and d initially due to budget restrictions.
Three questions:
1) What power supply should I purchase to power this configuration?
2) The 4510 will connect to two Catalyst Blade 3020 switch, each using 4gig etherchannels. Can we do this connecting to item c or do we need an additional card (the only other things attached to item c are probably a Windows storage server and domain controller)
3) Does this sound like it will give us good performance or have I missed anything?
Many thanks for any advice
Mark

1:) Do you plan to use PoE with your line cards? Make sure you plan accordingly. I would recommend using the power calculator for this.
2:)This can be done no problem. No additional equipment required.
3:) You should be fine performance wise. This is a pretty standard setup.
Cisco Power Calculator
http://tools.cisco.com/cpc/launch.jsp
HTH,
Mark

Does TR line card (ASR9K) support H-QoS?

Hi,
I have some question regarding on the 2nd generation line card for ASR9k.
Line Card Types
The Cisco ASR 9000 Series line cards are available in Service Edge Optimized and Packet Transport Optimized variants.
• Service Edge Optimized (SE) line cards are designed for customer deployments requiring enhanced quality of service (QoS).
• Packet Transport Optimized (TR) line cards are designed for network deployments where basic QoS is required.
Different line card types may be mixed within the same system.
I already review ASR9k presentation from Xander-Thuijs and found that
SE line card support 256K queues/NP
TR line card support 8 queues/Port
I'm not sure whether TR line card support H-QoS.
Could you please give more clarification about this?
Br,
Pipatpong

HEre is an example:
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:A9K-BNG#show qos int g 0/0/0/0 out
Sun Oct 13 13:31:19.867 EDT
Interface: GigabitEthernet0_0_0_0 output
Bandwidth configured: 200000 kbps Bandwidth programed: 200000 kbps
ANCP user configured: 0 kbps ANCP programed in HW: 0 kbps
Port Shaper programed in HW: 200000 kbps
Policy: xtp Total number of classes: 4
Level: 0 Policy: xtp Class: class-default
QueueID: N/A
Shape CIR : NONE
Shape PIR Profile : 0/4(S) Scale: 195 PIR: 199680 kbps PBS: 2496000 bytes
WFQ Profile: 0/9 Committed Weight: 10 Excess Weight: 10
Bandwidth: 0 kbps, BW sum for Level 0: 0 kbps, Excess Ratio: 1
Level: 1 Policy: xt Class: m1
Parent Policy: xtp Class: class-default
QueueID: 136 (Priority 1)
Queue Limit: 4 kbytes Abs-Index: 4 Template: 0 Curve: 6
Shape CIR Profile: INVALID
Policer Profile: 53 (Single)
Conform: 296 kbps (300 kbps) Burst: 3750 bytes (0 Default)
Child Policer Conform: TX
Child Policer Exceed: DROP
Child Policer Violate: DROP
Level: 1 Policy: xt Class: m2
Parent Policy: xtp Class: class-default
QueueID: 137 (Priority 2)
Queue Limit: 8 kbytes Abs-Index: 6 Template: 0 Curve: 6
Shape CIR Profile: INVALID
Policer Profile: 54 (Single)
Conform: 600 kbps (600 kbps) Burst: 7500 bytes (0 Default)
Child Policer Conform: TX
Child Policer Exceed: DROP
Child Policer Violate: DROP
Level: 1 Policy: xt Class: class-default
Parent Policy: xtp Class: class-default
QueueID: 138 (Priority Normal)
Queue Limit: 2496 kbytes Abs-Index: 89 Template: 0 Curve: 0
Shape CIR Profile: INVALID
WFQ Profile: 0/9 Committed Weight: 10 Excess Weight: 10
Bandwidth: 0 kbps, BW sum for Level 1: 0 kbps, Excess Ratio: 1
This class default will get reused by other interaces very likely unless you have a bw remaining (percent) in there.
So every time you see a unique QueueID you burn a queue.
the reason why the parent shaper at level 0 says N/A is because this is a hierarchical pmap and is shaping the overal chuld classes inclduing class-default.
So in this example applying this pmap multiple times will burn queues for class-default.
In other words, this Pmap example uses 3 queues. One for the shaper (child class-default) and 2 PQ's of prio's 1 and 2).
policy-map xtp
class class-default
service-policy xt
shape average 200 mbps
end-policy-map
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:A9K-BNG#sh run policy-map xt
Sun Oct 13 13:34:45.049 EDT
policy-map xt
class m1
priority level 1
police rate 300 kbps
class m2
priority level 2
police rate 600 kbps
class class-default
end-policy-map

Line Cards support for SupEngine 7

Hi,
I would like to upgrade my 4507 core switch which currently has Sup IV to Sup7.
the core switch currently has classic line cards WS-x4506-GB-T and WS-x4224-RJ45V and my worry is these May not be supported..
The datasheet list these as part of the supported classic cards but I would wish to get a confirmation that this is indeed so and what issues I should expect? please advise...
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
Line cards shouldn't be an issue. (Don't recall us bumping into any line cards issues with the sup7.)
You may need to upgrade your chassis, though.

Why three flavours for line cards?

What are the main differences between modular services cards, forwarding processor cards and label switch processor cards? I'm looking for the reason why completely new names were created, i.e. what new functions were added so that MSC name had to be changed to FP or LSP.

Hello Tenaro,
LSP, MSC and FP are different line cards to address discrete functional requirements of different positions in a network.
you can compare the cards' data sheets for differences
CRS-LSP
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps5763/data_sheet_c78-659947.html
CRS-FP140
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps5763/CRS-FP-140_DS.html
CRS-MSC
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps5763/CRS_MSC-140G.html
Regards,
/A

Can someone provide a link to the firmware download for Cat65k 67xx series line cards?

I want to check the current firmware releases on Cisco.com for line cards fitted to 6500 series switches. The only images I've been able to locate are those for the supervisor modules.
I cannot locate rommon/firmware images for the 67xx line cards, where are these on the website?

Since receiving the reply yesterday I've had a closer look at this. Attached is an excel file that shows the firmware versions for all the modules fitted.
I see that the same module type has 1 of two firmware versions, surely if this had been downloaded from the supervisor at module boot time then the same version of card would have a consistent firmware version??
E.G. the WS-X6748-SFP modules have either 12.2(14r)S5 or 12.2(18r)S1 in the same chassis.
Can someone explain this in a bit more detail please?

High response time on one line card in Cisco 6513 Catalyst Switch

I am facing a wierd issue with one of the line card in the Cisco 6513 switch. All the servers, desktops and trunks connected to this line card are showing high response time (>500ms) locally. But those IP phones connected to the same line card is working fine and the repsonse time is always 1ms. I am unable to find any root cause as i am not seeing any errors or logs, please help me to fidn the root cause.
Anyway i ahve a plan to reboot the line card and test it, but i am just looking for a fix that would help us to avoid the reboot.
The affected module is WS-X6548-GE-TX.
No errors for the following commands.
#sh fabric status
#sh fabric error
#sh module all
#sh module <slot>
#sh interface counter errors
#sh version:
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) s72033_rp Software (s72033_rp-IPSERVICESK9_WAN-M), Version 12.2(18)SXF11, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Compiled Fri 14-Sep-07 21:50 by kellythw
Image text-base: 0x40101040, data-base: 0x42DB89D0
ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.2(17r)SX5, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
BOOTLDR: s72033_rp Software (s72033_rp-IPSERVICESK9_WAN-M), Version 12.2(18)SXF11, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
CISCOCORE-6513 uptime is 4 weeks, 4 days, 18 hours, 35 minutes
Time since CISCOCORE-6513 switched to active is 4 weeks, 4 days, 18 hours, 34 minutes
System returned to ROM by reload at 04:33:29 UTC Fri Feb 22 2013 (SP by reload)
System image file is "sup-bootdisk:s72033-ipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF11.bin"
cisco WS-C6513 (R7000) processor (revision 1.0) with 458720K/65536K bytes of memory.
Processor board ID SAL09507GV9
SR71000 CPU at 600Mhz, Implementation 0x504, Rev 1.2, 512KB L2 Cache
Last reset from s/w reset
SuperLAT software (copyright 1990 by Meridian Technology Corp).
X.25 software, Version 3.0.0.
Bridging software.
TN3270 Emulation software.
15 Virtual Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interfaces
172 Gigabit Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interfaces
4 Ten Gigabit Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interfaces
1917K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
8192K bytes of packet buffer memory.
65536K bytes of Flash internal SIMM (Sector size 512K).
Configuration register is 0x2102

What supervisor are you running ?
Be aware that the 6548 module is quite heavily oversubscribed and you could be running into this ie. servers will definitely be sending a lot more data than an IP phone.
The 6548 has an 8Gbps connection the switch fabric (note this is assuming a sup 720). So you have 48 1Gbps ports going in (in = from end devices) and only 8Gbps going out (out = to the switch fabric). Each group of 6 ports shares a 1Gbps connection the switch fabric. So lets says on one of those groupings you had 6 servers with 1Gbps connections. If only three of these servers were sending out 400Mbps of data each you have contention because 3 x 400Mbps = 1.2Gbps and you only have 1Gbps to the switch fabric.
If this is the problem there are a couple of solutions -
1) you can look into how the devices are spread across the port groupings and maybe you could move things around to make the traffic more even among port groupings. However you mention servers and trunks so you could just end up with the same problem but also the phones are not working either.
2) you can look to migrate some connections off that module onto another but this supposes you have spare capacity elsewhere. If those trunk links are connected to other switches then you would defintely want to look into moving these as the 6548 was never intended to be used as an uplink module between switches.
3) you could upgrade the module to something like a 6748 (or whatever the latest is as they keep introducing new ones) which has a much better connection to the switch fabric. Again this assumes a sup720 as the 6748 would't work with a sup32.
However don't just rush into 3) without first doing some investigation work eg. what do the servers do, how much traffic are they churning out etc. Have you looked at the interface stats for each connection to see if you are getting drops etc ?
Jon

Supervisory engine, backplane switching,line cards

Hello,
i have a couple of questions and they are thus:
1.Is the line card a module or are they different parts of the switch. What is the function of the line card ?
2.From my understanding the supervisory engine is like the brain of the device. It controls all or most of the software related functionality of the device. Am I correct?
3.What is the difference between the SUP720 and SUP32?
4.Is the CatOS solely for layer 2 switching while the IOS is for routing?
5. when we refer to backplane does that mean how fast a switch switches packets ?
Best Regards,
DJ.

Hello,
Please find below answers inline,
1.Is the line card a module or are they different parts of the switch. What is the function of the line card ?
Yes, Linecards/Modules are different part of the switch. You can insert multiple cards into the Chassis. You can also have service moduels like Wism/FWSM/ACE
depends upon the business needs.
2.From my understanding the supervisory engine is like the brain of the device. It controls all or most of the software related functionality of the device. Am I correct?
Yes, Supervisor is the brain of the switch controls each function. A typical Supervisor consists of PFC which has TCAM L2/L3 Engines and RP/SP Processor and A replication engine (Hyperion) for Multicast. TCAM is the area where the RP/SP programmes the switch. There are multiple things that get programmed in TCAM like QoS/ACL/Netflow etc.
They have their respective hardware entries in the TCAM. If the entry is not found that is when the packet gets punted to CPU. If the linecard has a DFC on it then it can download the information from L2/L3 Engines from TCAM and switching gets fast as everytime the lookup happens in the Linecard instead of the Supervisor.
3.What is the difference between the SUP720 and SUP32?
SUp 32 : 32Gb backplane supporting hardware accelerated Layer 2 and 3, QoS and Security policies up to 15Mpps…
Sup 720: 720Gb backplane supporting hardware accelerated Layer 2 and 3, QoS and Security policies up to 400Mpps…
4.Is the CatOS solely for layer 2 switching while the IOS is for routing?
If you have a hybrid switch with CATOS/MSFC(IOS) CATos represents the switching part and MSFC represents the Routing part of the network.
5. when we refer to backplane does that mean how fast a switch switches packets ?
Backplane is used for communication between SUP - LC's.The area divided into three subsections,
1) D-bus - Used for data flow
2) R-bus - Used for result lookups
3) EOBC - Control communications like IPC/ScP which is helps the Supervisor to maintain the other line cards.
Depends on the line card the backplane can work in three different modes,
1) Flowthrough
Between non fabric modules and between a non fabric and a fabric enabled linecard
Throughput – 15 Mpps (@ 64 byte frames)
Bandwidth – 16 Gbps of bandwidth shared throughout
Data Bus frame size is variable; min of 4 cycles (64B Data) on the DBus for every frame +1 wait cycle
2) compact
When only ALL fabric enabled linecards in a chassis
Throughput – 30 Mpps (@ any frame size)
Bandwidth – 8 G CEF256; 20 G/channel CEF720
Data Bus frame size is constant (compact header); 2 cycles (32 B Data) on the DBus for every frame + no wait cycle
3) truncated
Between fabric linecards when a non fabric linecard is in the chassis.
Throughput – 15 Mpps (@ 64 byte frames); independent of frame size for CEF256 and CEF720
Bandwidth – 16 G shared for classic; 8 G per CEF256; 20 G/channel CEF720.
Data Bus frame size is variable; min of 4 cycles (64 Bytes Data) on the Data Bus for every frame.
Thanks,
Ricky Micky
*Rate Useful posts

My girlfriend gave me a $25 iTunes gift card for Christmas, so I switched to the Canada store and spend most of it with .02¢ remaining. *Now I want to switch back to my original store, but I can't.

My friend gave me a $25 iTunes gift card for Christmas, so I switched to the US store and spend most of it with 11¢ remaining. *Now I want to switch back to my original store, but I can't. iTunes keeps saying "You have a store credit balance; you must spend your balance before you can change stores.*

You might just have to contact Apple and ask them to remove it (losing it). Usually people clear a balance by buying one song and having the exact remainder charged to their credit card, but if you don't have a US credit card you cannot do that.
iTunes Customer Service Contact - http://www.apple.com/support/itunes/contact.html

I am using NIPCI6229 card i want to generate 5 V in the digital ouput line . it has to be there in the output line only for 100ms please help me

i am using NIPCI6229 card i want to generate 5 V in the digital ouput line . it has to be there in the output line only for 100ms please help me. aftwer 100ms it has to go to zero state

hi,
You can try generating 5V continously for 100ms in a loop later on you can make it low.
Hope this helps you.

Core Image Cards for Powermac G4 Dual MDD FW800

Hello there Gentlemen, currently running my Dual G4 with a ATI Pro Radeon 9000. This card does NOT Support Core Image. i need however ADC for
my flat panel from Apple 20". So what are my choices to get a card
that does core image and will drive my Cinema display?
cheers
sir double null

Hey null,
looks like we have close to the same machine. I have the 9000 card in my machine also and recently purchased the ATI 9800 which is supposed to be a great card. Unfortunately, it isn't working for me yet. I don't know if the problem is just my computer or something else. I have an open thread just two below yours:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=264933&tstart=0
Here's the link for graphics cards that support core image..
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=301347
I don't see the 9800 listed in this list? But I could have sworn it was on the list a couple months ago, at least the 9800 was in order to run Motion. It's so completely frustrating.
Post back if you get a video card working and what it is.

POE Line Cards for 6807 Core Switch

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for