Point of view provision members in FR

Hallo,
we have designed report in FR Studio. It has 4 data grids, Entity is part of main POV.
Customer requires that users see only relevant Entities in the list, it is possible?
thx

roboh wrote:
Hallo,
we have designed report in FR Studio. It has 4 data grids, Entity is part of main POV.
Customer requires that users see only relevant Entities in the list, it is possible?
thxRelevant entities of that user? If so you can define MetaRead filters in Essbase and acheive it.
Regards
Celvin
http://www.orahyplabs.com

Similar Messages

Financial Reporting: Base members of Current Point of View for Entity

How do you typically handle reports in which you'd like to show all base members of the current point of view, but also allow the user to select a base entity?
Example A: Base members of Current Point of View for Entity
User selects a base entity: report errors
User selects a parent: report functions as expected and shows base entities
Example B: Base members of Current Point of View for Entity (Inclusive)
User selects a base entity: report functions as expected and shows the base entity
User selects a parent: report shows base entities (as expected), but also shows the parent entity (which we do not want to see)
I think the last case listed is what we want, but is there any way to just show the base entities? Like an advanced suppression option or something I'm missing.
Thanks.

Unfortunately, we don't have anything that uniquely identifies our base entities (close, but not all of them). However, the report does work as desired by using the following for entity, set in the advanced properties:
Base members of Current Point of View for Entity (Inclusive) AND Bottom of hierarchy Entity
This will allow the user to select either A) parent or B) base entity from the hierarchy and the report will show either A) base entities of the parent (not the parent) or B) the base entity.
Not sure why this works and all the other things attempted did not, but as long as it works. Also tried conditional formatting on Level, but that always threw a level 0 (for both base and parent).

Document Management System for sap mm point of view steps

Hi All.
Document management system for sap mm point of view steps required.
Thanks in advance for all sap mm forum members.
Regards.
Parameshwar

Hi,
Customizing settings can be collected by processes into Business Configuration Sets (BC Sets). BC Sets make Customizing more transparent by documenting and analyzing the Customizing settings. They can also be used for a group rollout, where the customizing settings are bundled by the group headquarters and passed on in a structured way to its subsidiaries.
BC Sets are provided by SAP for selected industry sectors, and customers can also create their own.
When a BC Set is created, values and combinations of values are copied from the original Customizing tables into the BC Set and can be copied into in the tables, views and view clusters in the customer system. The BC Sets are always transported into the customer system in which Customizing is performed.
Advantages of using BC Sets:
1.     Efficient group rollout.
2.     Industry sector systems are easier to create and maintain.
3.     Customizing can be performed at a business level.
4.     Change Management is quicker and safer.
5.     Upgrade is simpler.
To create BC sets follow the below step:
Choose Tools ® Customizing ® Business Configuration Sets® Maintenance in the SAP
menu, or enter the transaction code SCPR3 in the command field.
Choose Bus.Conf.Set ® Create.

Data loading - Member containing comma taken in point-of-view

Hi,
I tried loading date into planning. My point-of-View contains a member which has comma in it.
When loading it is considering that member as two different members.
Has anyone tried loading data into planning with members having comma.
Eg. Item No.,Start Date,Point-of-View,Data load Cube Name
30103,11-02-2011,"Actual,Version1,Dazzing Infotech, Inc,230"Capex
I have 6 dimensions say.
Dazzing Infotech, Inc is a member in dimension. It has comma which is seperating it as two members.
Error when loading is "Dazzing Infotech" doesn't exist or you do not have access to it.
Has anyone worked on this issue previously.
Thanks

I agree that it would be cleaner to use the commas in an alias rather than a member name.
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Date loading - Member containing comma in Point-of-View

Hi,
I tried loading date into essbase via planning. My point-of-View contains a member which has comma in it.
When loading it is considering that member as two different members.
Has anyone tried loading data into planning with members having comma.
Eg. Item No.,Start Date,Point-of-View,Data load Cube Name
30103,11-02-2011,"Actual,Version1,Dazzing Infotech, Inc,230"Capex
I have 6 dimensions say.
Dazzing Infotech, Inc is a member in dimension. It has comma which is seperating it as two members.
Error when loading is "Dazzing Infotech" doesn't exist or you do not have access to it.
Has anyone worked on this issue previously.
Thanks

Cross post :- Data loading - Member containing comma taken in point-of-view
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Filter in User point of view

Hi ,
I have set a filter Custom ( Just two values) for Version which is set as user point of view .
I can see only two values in the FR studio for that report .
But i have following issues.
1) When other users/developers login with there credentials the custom filter is not getting applied . That is the other developer can see all the values.
2) When i run the report in workspace the custom filter does not get set . It shows all the values even though in the design the Custom filter is set.
please let me know how i can resolve the above issue and is critical for me .
Thanks and Regards
Vijaya

I know what you are referring to. What you did was create a filter only for your user id and not for the report. That option in the FR Studio is very misleading, it makes it appear as if the report was limited to those 2 members. It is only for the user id of the person developing the report when you preview the report.
What you can do is put Version in the Grid POV. There you can limit the members users will see when they run the report. Unfortunately, it's not very pretty and a bit confusing for users.

Preview User Point of View

I have noted an odd behavior in Financial Reporting for some but not all users. When users are prompted for the point of view selection, for the Entity dimension all of the members are listed and not shown hierarchically. This is true of only Entity and only for some users. All other dimensions behave normally and only a few users have experienced this. Users seeing this behavior include interactive users and planners. Has anyone run into this, know what causes it, how to fix it?
(We are running EPM 11.1.1.2)
Thanks.

Hi,
It seems that there is problem in POV setting. Affected users need to set the POV of reports again.
In this issue it might be possible that in users POV specific entity members are present,instead of that users have to select total entity hierarchy in users POV setting.
Hope this will help...!

Plant from FICO Point of View?

Dear Members,
can somebody tell me the purpose and importance of the plant from FICO point of view.
what parameters will decide about how many plants an organisation can have.
what implecations can a plant has from taxes view point.
regards,
sashi.

You already posted this yesterday. > Plant from FICO Point of View?
Do not repost. Respect Forum rules.

Report for Paid Invoices from AP Point of view.

Hello Gurus,
I am looking for a Report from SAP which will give me the Paid Invoices Information from Accounts Payable Point of view for a Particular Period which should cover the below information...
Entity
Invoice #
Invoice Date
Vendor Name
Invoice Amount
Currency
NET terms - NT30, NT 00 like wise
Net due date -
Paid Date
Document Types
Document Number
Please let me know the Standard Report Transaction Code ASAP.Quick response will be appreciated.
Thanks,
B

Hi:
Refer to FBL1N - Display/Change Line Items in accounts payable.
Select vendor accout,co.code,cleared items on a particular date and execute.
From change layout (Ctrl+F8), you can select payment terms,Net due date,account type,account document
Please let me know if you need more information.
Assign points if useful.
Regards
Sridhar M

Client Merge! precautions to be taken from BW point of view

Hi,
We are in a process of merging two clients in R/3 which are typical source systems for BW!
What are the steps that we should take care of while the client merge is on from R/3 side.
these two clients are ofcourse very important for BW system as almost all for everydata load the extraction logic in FM to the ABAP routine in selection of infopacakge is different!
in a scenario such as this, what are the things that should i make a note from BW point of view?
Raj

Hi,
1.Internal table with header line will not support in ECC 6.0 for that u need to create internal table and work area using TYPES.
2.Mostly u need to do some PATCH WORK for the STANDARD programmes.
Patch work in the sense for SPAU objects in Mysap is there any code written by client(INSERT {....END INSERT....}) this type of code u need to add in ECC 6.0 code....
3.Mostly u have to resolve EPC(Extended program check) errors.
In that u will find so many type of errors...Field attribute errors,Perform interface errors,Obsolete stetement errors,....etc.
4.First thing u need to what r the SCOPE and OUT OF SCOPE in your upgradation.
5.If u find any Fmodules obsolete...U just press F1 on that Fmodule it will show which function module can useful instead of that obsolete one...
6.If they want UNI CODE compatiable .....
EX Report...
Go to the attributes of the report...
There u can c a check box to check UNI CODE Errors...
U have to resolve these errors also...
After doing all these things u have to show 0 errors on CODE INSPECTOR fro each n every object...
Thats t as per my knowledge...
Regards,
Kishore Reddy.

In BI 7,in loading point of view what is the difference

Hello All
In BI 7,in loading point of view
Upto the first level(upto PSA) we use infopackage and from that layer onwards we use DTP's.
My question is why do we want to use DTPs there? Why cant we use infopackage only?
What is the advantage by using this DTPs for loading the data within BI
Please let me know in this regard
Many Thanks
Swami

Hi Swami,
Although not recommended you can still use infopackages if you want in BI 7.x. The introduction of the DTP was to overcome some disadvantages of using infopackages up to and including release 3.x to load the data targets (especially with datamarts where one infopackage loads several data targets,
if something goes wrong with the load to one of these data targets then it can be very difficult to correct).
This section contains some arguments in brief why the DTP was introduced with BI 7.0 :
Transfer from one source to one target
BW 3.X
One InfoPackage / Request supplies data for several data targets
Fixed sequence of steps (DataSource / transfer rules / update rules / data target)
Fixed source type: Combination DataSource/source system
Fixed target type: Cube or ODS object or master data
No init selection for extraction from infoprovider
One request can produce several error requests, depending on the data targets
No error handling into ODS Objects
Delta management
BI 3.X: The Receiver for DataSources is merely a logical system, which makes it impossible to have a separate delta management for several data targets within
one system
BI 7.0
Data Transfer Process transports data from one data source to one data target; new source and target types can easily be defined
Arbitrary number of steps (filter objects/transformations) between two persistent objects
Init selection available
Request produces error records stored in generic error stack
Error handling into ODS Objects possible
Resume from persistent buffer
Delta management
BI 7.0: The delta management is maintained by the data transfer process which connects arbitrary sources and targets
I hope the above helps.
Des.

Batch managment from MM point of view

Dear Friends,
I want to learn the Batch management from MM point of view.
Can you please provide me the material which will explain me how to configure the SAP system for batch managment from MM point of view.
Thanks a lot
Nilesh

Please check these answered links:
Batch management
batch management
Batch Management
Edited by: Afshad Irani on Jun 14, 2010 3:15 PM

Comparison of SAP R/3 4.7 with SAP ERP 6.0 in Basis point of view

Hi Experts,
Can we compare R/3 4.7 and ECC 6.0 in Basis point of view.
Say for example Password is case sensitive in new version, DBACOCKPIT added for central maintenance of database.
Like this can we list out some of the changes or differences.
It will be more helpful
Regards
KT

Hi,
compare to 4.7
1.New ABAP editor added like if u write code in abap editor ,using if coditions and select statments it automatically shows the link endif, like if .. endif,select ...endselect.
2.New abap debugger compare to the classic debugger.
3.DBACOCKPIT
Missing indexes of various database tablesu2019 and the transaction to reactivate all the missing indexes is u2018DBACOCKPITu2019. Below is the screenshot of the transaction DBACOCKPIT.
Regards,
Madhu

In SD point of view , that r things we can check in Screen MD04

In SD point of view , that r things we can check in Screen MD04
Key areas and feilds in MD04 to look after for SD and PP integration and respective roles of consultants.

yeap ur correct just we have to check in mod04 what happening in production procurment and make to order that means forcast sales . depond on forcast sales manufecturing is going on so we can only see that process i sgoing or not k thanku

Performance point of view

Hi every one,
I am new to XI . I have a small doubt in Mappings.
In XI we have 4 types of mappings:
1.Graphical mapping
2.XSLT mapping,
3.Java Mapping
4.ABAP mapping
In case of performance point of view which one is best .
Plz explain me in details .
I will give full points for correct answers.
Thanks and Regards,
P.Naganjana Reddy

Hi,
refer to these links:
Re: Why xslt mapping?
http://searchsap.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid21_gci1217018,00.html
/people/r.eijpe/blog/2006/02/20/xml-dom-processing-in-abap-part-iiib150-xml-dom-within-sap-xi-abap-mapping
/people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2006/12/27/aspirant-to-learn-sap-xiyou-won-the-jackpot-if-you-read-this-part-iii
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/8a57d190-0201-0010-9e87-d8f327e1dba7
Regards,
Nithiyanandam

Point of view provision members in FR

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for