Poor LV6.1 webserver performance

Hi!
I want to use the LV6.1 webserver to serve a static html site
including some front panel images.
All works as expected except the very poor performance even on the
local system.
I first suspected PC/WIn configuration problems but since two other
webservers work fine i think there must be some problem with labview.
Does anyone know of performance affecting settings of LV or other
issues that might be of importance for LV webserver performance?
Any ideas welcome
bye
Holger

Labviewguru wrote in message news:<506500000005000000CE880000-1023576873000@exchange.ni.com>...
> Holger,
>
> I have used the LabVIEW HTTP server before, and didn't recognize any
> problems. I would recommend contacting NI support (ni.com/ask) to
> find out if there is anything you are doing wrong. However; if you
> are sending images through the HTTP server, you may want to consider
> that the HTTP server may not be optimized for images and files.
That's what i'm trying to do. But the images are fairly small (one is
100k, the rest is very small <10k). Or is the LV webserver not good
for static websites at all?(Only for LV panels)
>
> If you don't find a solution to the problem, then I can suggest a very
> easy solution that isn't that expen
sive. Linux contains the Apache
> server. Apache has been hosting most of the websites on the web since
> the beginning, and in the beginning, was the ONLY way to host web
> content. Its free, and all you need is a small computer to run it on.
> You can even network your system to it and have the linux machine
> mount your harddrive to source the web files.
As i wrote i tried different webservers already and if the LV problems
don't go away i will use one of them. Since the website and the
projekt is kind of small i will stay at the windows platform. Apache
is available there too but i prefer something easier (in the moment i
use sambar, it's free too).
Maybe this is the way to go but i do want to run two webservers for
one small website.
Thanks
Holger

Similar Messages

Poor PXI IO performance on Latitude E6410 with ExpressCard 8360

Hello,
I have a Dell Latitude E6410 with a Core-i5 M520 which is giving me very poor io performance when using an ExpressCard 8360 card to connect to a PXI Rack.
The sustained IO rate that I can get appears to be about 1/3 of that that I can get using the same ExpressCard on a Dell Latitude E6400 (with a Core2Duo processor).
I am using the A05 bios (latest at time of writing) on the E6410.
Wade.

I am running Windows XP (32 bit) sp3 in both cases.
The E6410 has 4GByte of memory fitted.
The E6400 has 2GByte of memory fitted.
I have also use the same ExpressCard 8360 via a PXIe to ExpressCard Adaptor in a Desktop machine with similar performance figures to the E6400 - i.e. much better than the E6410.
The Desktop Machine is an HP Compaq D7900 with 4GByte of memory, Core2Duo E8500 also running Windows XP sp3 (32 bit).
Also, on the Desktop, I am running NI PXI Platform Services 2.3.2 and NI-Visa runtime version 4.3.
On the E6410, I am running NI PXI Platform Services 2.5.2 and NI-Visa runtime version 4.6.
I no longer have access to the E6400 so I am not sure what sofware versions were installed. However, they are unlikely to be new than the versions installed on the E6410.
Wade.

BlackBerry z10 battery poor performance

Hey i have a question with regards to how am I supposed to improve my battery on the z10. I bought this phone last year at full price from my carrier. Since then the battery performance has been very poor... even after the number of updates and reducing which apps are running, it still won't last more than 5 hours when using the phone. in fact I would say it drains very quickly. I see the % sign on the battery and it moves from 100% to 87% very quickly like within an hour when i am using my phone. I have done a lot of research over the past year and read forums on how to improve it and have had no results. Can anyone provide me any advice? Perhaps someone from blackberry themselves? I am really disappointed because I could have spent that money on a different phone which has a battery that actually lasts the day. Thank you and I will await for some feedback.

dgosman wrote:
Have you checked if there are any specific apps that drain the battery ?
Settings->App manager-> Device monitor->Battery
That option is only on newer OS versions.
What OS are you on and do you have many email accounts set up that sync contacts, calendar and more?
I had a corrupt contact that would try to sync over and over again.
Start with this if you sync Over The Air with Outlook
In outlook Make a new folder for contacts called backup
move all contacts to the folder and wait for all to be removed from device
then pull battery on device and put back in
After device boots move contacts from backup to the contacts folder and wait for them all to appear
Make a new contact in outlook and see if it gets to the device.
highlight calendar
goto file import/export
choose export to file
choose Persoanl folder pst, next
make sure calendar is highlighted and choose subfolders if you have them, next
save to desktop with a name you can remember, Finish
Click ok on screen popup
Go to view, arange by events
delete all entries.
close outlook and any word files, open outlook back up after 15 seconds.
Then
goto file import/export
import from another program or file, next
choose Persoanl folder pst, next
find the file and import
Choose highlight calendar and Finish
Change view back to what you want and try again.
Click here to Backup the data on your BlackBerry Device! It's important, and FREE!
Click "Accept as Solution" if your problem is solved. To give thanks, click thumbs up
Click to search the Knowledge Base at BTSC and click to Read The Fabulous Manuals
BESAdmin's, please make a signature with your BES environment info.
SIM Free BlackBerry Unlocking FAQ
Follow me on Twitter @knottyrope
Want to thank me? Buy my KnottyRope App here
BES 12 and BES 5.0.4 with Exchange 2010 and SQL 2012 Hyper V

T520 poor performance and SpeedStep problem

Hi to all the users in the forum!
I'm new to this forum and I would like to thanks for any future help that you'll give me.
After some months of using my new T520 (i7 2620m) I was really disappointed for the poor performance of this ThinkPad.
Briefly I've noticed slow responses to many programs in particular in the MS office enviroment (.ppt files) as well as on my gmail interface under firefox, and in general the Win7 environment. It sounds really strange to me, I came from a 5 years old Intel®-Centrino® (1.7Ghz) experience and the differences between the old and the new machine should be more sharp. So I've investigated to understand this behavior. Before that I've upgraded the system with the newest files.
To understend the behaviour I've used the following software (x64):
CPU-Z to evaluate the performance in terms of Core speed; Multiplier and Bus Speed
Prime95 to produce an heavy load
Intel processor ID Utility to produce a "certified" report.
The responses is always the same. The multiplier is stuck at 8X with a frequency of about 0.79Ghz and the gauge in the CPU performance of the Lenovo Power Manager” always indicating 29% (that is 0.79Ghz of the 2.7Ghz of the i7 2620M processor). Nothing change if I switch on the turbo boost or if I made some variation in the performance profile. The only change that I can observe/listen is an increase rotation of the system fan and the consequent noise increase when the turbo boost is on. Even during the “torture-test” of Prime95 no differences in frequency is observed.
The only way to obtain an higher frequency is to disable the speedstep technology from the BIOS setup, with the consequence to have the multiplier stuck to 24X with a frequency of 2.7Ghz…. but is not a solution!
The described behavior of this processor under Win7 is also observed with Ubuntu 11.04.
I’ve reported the problem to the technical support, and they ask me to run the “Lenovo Toolbox System” because is the only software that they can “trust”. So I did it and sent the log files. Now I’m waiting for a response and in the meantime I would like to discuss, report and share my experience to this forum.
Actually from my point of view, there is a serious problem with the i7 processor, that I can’t solve and a substitution is required. I’m disappointed because I’m using since some months a PC with reduced performance and because I spent my time to demonstrate this evidence. I hope to solve quickly this inconvenience and I’ll report to the forum any news from the technical support.
Thanks
Misuraka
Solved!
Go to Solution.

The CPU will throttle down if the battery is removed. This is intentional for various reasons.
To extend overall battery longevity, use the provided Power Manager.
1) Launch Power Manager
2) Click Advanced in the top right
3) Go to the Battery tab
4) Click Battery Maintenance
5) Choose Custom charge threshold
6) Start charging from 80, stop charging at 90.
This should extend battery lifespan. Avoid overcharging it, and avoid overdepleting it. Lithium ion batteries don't last long under those circumstances.
In extended storage or when you know you will be using AC almost exclusively, set the charging threshold to 30 to 40, deplete it to 40%, then leave it there.
There's lots of technical details here: http://www.batteryuniversity.com/
W520: i7-2720QM, Q2000M at 1080/688/1376, 21GB RAM, 500GB + 750GB HDD, FHD screen
X61T: L7500, 3GB RAM, 500GB HDD, XGA screen, Ultrabase
Y3P: 5Y70, 8GB RAM, 256GB SSD, QHD+ screen

Poor WiFi performance of Yoga 2 11?

I have just purchased a Yoga 2 11 and find that connectivity is poor (zero to two bars) and unreliable (occasionally reverting to a yellow exclamation point) in my favorite thinking chair. I get reasonable performance at the same location from other machines including a T420, a Nexus 7, and an IPad. After reviewing some community forum fixes for the presumably Yoga 2 Pro, I have checked to ensure that I have the most recent driver; that I have turned off bluetooth; that I am not using protected sharing; that windows is not managing the wifi Plus I have installed on the order of 33 windows updates (a pretty large number considering this is right out of the box on the first day of availability!). Am I missing anything or is this a problem related to something unfixable like the antenna design? Other potentially connected diagnostic information is that some sites e.g. zillo do not load quickly behave very smoothly, even in locations with more than one "bar" of wifi connectivity. Thank in advance for any input.

I see the same poor wifi connection when comparing to my old laptop and to my Galaxy S4. I updated the driver but it did not help (think it was the same one). I have a week left for no hassle returns and if this cannot get resolved I think this unit has to go back.
anonymousscreen wrote:
I have just purchased a Yoga 2 11 and find that connectivity is poor (zero to two bars) and unreliable (occasionally reverting to a yellow exclamation point) in my favorite thinking chair. I get reasonable performance at the same location from other machines including a T420, a Nexus 7, and an IPad. After reviewing some community forum fixes for the presumably Yoga 2 Pro, I have checked to ensure that I have the most recent driver; that I have turned off bluetooth; that I am not using protected sharing; that windows is not managing the wifi Plus I have installed on the order of 33 windows updates (a pretty large number considering this is right out of the box on the first day of availability!). Am I missing anything or is this a problem related to something unfixable like the antenna design? Other potentially connected diagnostic information is that some sites e.g. zillo do not load quickly behave very smoothly, even in locations with more than one "bar" of wifi connectivity. Thank in advance for any input.

New Thinkpad T430 - slow performance, poor battery life

Hi Guys,
I bought a T430 a couple of three months ago, to replace an older HP elitebook. I have really not made the transition yet because the new T430 is very much slower and the battery life worse than the elitebook, which is certainly 7 years old.
The speed issue is such that operations are very slow. The machine boots up or comes out of sleep/hibernate without any real issues, but try to open a program (excel, for instance) and it takes ages. One thing I do have on the system is an excel file which I update every few days. Generally speaking, it takes 30 seconds to get the machine to the desktop, then I can go to the bathroom whilst waiting for excel to actually start after I have double clicked the file (it rarely opens in less than a minute). I did have avast AV and I guessed it might have been the problem (it has pop-ups all over the show), so I installed it but things are no different. The problem occurs all the time, a restart doesn't suddenly give me a silky fast moving machine. This has pretty much been the case since I first started the machine.
The second issue is the battery. I changed the elitebook batter after about 5 years because it was strugging to do 2 hours. The replacement comfortably did (does) 4 hours, even after a couple of years. The new T430 barely manages 2 hours, I cannot go anywhere without a charger!
Any suggestions on what to do? The machine was bought because it has the Lenovo onsite support so the next step is going to be calling them because the operation is simply too poor for me to put the machine into use.
Many thanks

Yes I have.
Just web browsing and basically doing nothing I'm hear a lot of aduible fans, I'm getting 85C+ on GPU diode, 65+ on cpu heatsink. I since installed anohter program that shows me not just the CPU heatsink but the cores and the cores are at 90C+.
Seems like a lot of heat for doing nothing. Not only that but I have these problems with no external monitor while on battery power too.
I don't know what to do. They already replaced the logic board. Others seem to get advertised battery life out of Apple products and not have products that get **** near hot enough to burn you while just web browsing or watching a movie let alone advertised tasks like Photoshop and Final Cut Pro.

[W510] - USB 3.0 SSD, poor performance.

Help please?
I'm getting some rather poor performance on both of the USB 3.0 ports on the laptop.
I have an SSD that's been tested via internal SATA II connection, capable of (sequential) read 275MB/s, and write 250MB/s. Also have a 3.5 inch WD Caviar Black 2TB SATAIII (WD2002FAEX), tested via eSATA, capable of (sequential) read 150MB/s, and write 150MB/s (think it saturated the eSATA on the W510).
However, when either of these two drives was connected via USB 3.0 (tested with three different brands of USB 3.0 enclosure), the sequential read performance was only at 85MB/s, and write was (REALLY bad) at 60MB/s (even with the SSD). This leads me to think there's a bottleneck somewhere on the W510 (because I know for certain, the USB 3.0 enclosures are capable to at least give 130MB/s read and write. The drives are also capable of performing faster than 100MB/s as well).
All drivers, BIOS, firmware are the latest. Platform is Windows 7 Ultimate - 64bit.
The NEC USB 3.0 chipset seems to be connected to PCI Express 2.0 x1 bus. Reading on the Intel QM57 chipset spec, the PCI Express 2.0 implementation is only capable of serving 2.5GT/s (http://www.intel.com/products/notebook/chipsets/qm57/qm57-overview.htm), using 8b/10b encoding (http://www.tmworld.com/article/318759-What_does_GT_s_mean_anyway_.php), that gives 2Gbps. So I was expecting the USB 3.0 connection is capable of giving me around (not exact, as I accept there's overhead) 200MB/s.
At this point in time, a single mechanical drive (consumer level) can't quite go up to 200MB/s yet, but SSD can. And therefore, I expected my SSD benchmark via USB 3.0 could at least give me that....sadly it wasn't the case with the W510.
This brings two questions I have for the forum:
1. Why is my W510 USB 3.0, in combination with high performance disks and rather capable USB 3.0 enclosures, perform so poorly.
2. If my understanding from above is correct, then isn't this "USB 3.0" feature (regardless of my benchmark result) sounds misleading? Because the product, W510, is simply incapable of delivering a USB 3.0 experience even in "ideal" situation (limited by the 2.5GT/s).

I did try eSATA as well, the WD drive was able to do 150MB/s and 149MB/s, read and write respectively. (as the QM57 chipset natively supports SATA at 3Gb/s)
The issue here is as part of the decision process to get the W510, USB 3 capability came into consideration (for having more than 1 fast external storage device).
EDIT:
Ultimately, what I'm really after is:
1. Have I configured something incorrectly, or misconfigured something. Or is there's some ideal component linkage I'm missing.
2. Is the W510's USB 3.0, at the very least, capable of delivering 2.5GT/s?
3. I may, or may not have to file a complaint to Lenovo or BBB for misleading marketing / sales info.
2nd EDIT:
I do thank you for suggesting eSATA. However, if Lenovo is going to reply to this, I simply won't take "use the touchpad instead" if the trackpoint isn't working properly.

Constant Your Set Top Box Has No Data Connectivity/Poor DVR Performance

For the past few months I have been dealing with very poor performance out of my multi room DVR. Often in the middle of watching shows, the DVR will just disconnect and look for the hub which means rebooting the cable box and a constant stream of, “your set top box has no data connectivity” messages. This has elevated to beyond a nuisance. I have been in contact with Verizon Fios' live chat multiple times however they fail to solve the problem. The picture on the DVR is extremely choppy as it is having difficulty streaming and then it just drops and once again searches for the hub.
I have also recently upgraded to the 75/35 internet and the router has been cutting out and resetting at least twice an hour ever since. I love Verizon Fios and have recommended it to many of my friends who have also signed up. I am just looking for a solution to my DVR and internet woes.

You need to have a tech come to your house. You could have bad light at the ONT., bad router, bad ONT or bad coax somewhere.

Fixed - bent connector - S12 ION poor wireless performance - Lenovo support no help

Hi forum,
I received my Thanksgiving deal S12 ION last week. The size and format are perfect, the overall performance just what it needs to be, but the wireless performance is unacceptable. I work for IBM, and have a T60P work laptop and two Y430 laptops, all of which have perfect full bars of wireless signal throughout my house. But this S12 ION has only three bars in my office next to the wireless G router, and only one to two bars in the next room. From any other room in the house I cannot connect.
I verified that I have the most recent wireless drivers installed. The ones it shipped with are the most recent on the Lenovo support site.
I called Lenovo technical support. After waiting on hold, I was connected, then dropped after another 30 minute on hold. The second time I called in, I was told I needed to turn on the wireless using the switch. I informed the tech that I was already connected and that the issue was poor signal. He then suggested removing Lenovo readycomm, but that is not installed on this S12. Finally he told me that this is just a netbook, not a laptop and that if I do not like it I should return it.
I am so angry with this poor support I would return it immediately, if it were not for the 15% return fee.
Does anyone else have wireless issues? Am I mistaken about this being a nice wireless connectivity tool?
At the price I paid, $399, I can dump this on eBay, but I am seriously disappointed.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi Forum,
I opened the wireless card slot after reading in other netbook forums that some have had loose antenna connectors. At first I thought that was what I had as one of the leads, the black one, was not seated. It turns out that the connector on the wireless card was bent open.
See pics:
http://i241.photobucket.com/albums/ff283/skier757/Lenovo%20S12%20wireless%20card/PICT0004.jpg
http://i241.photobucket.com/albums/ff283/skier757/Lenovo%20S12%20wireless%20card/PICT0002.jpg
[IMG]http://i241.photobucket.com/albums/ff283/skier757/Lenovo%20S12%20wireless%20card/PICT0004.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i241.photobucket.com/albums/ff283/skier757/Lenovo%20S12%20wireless%20card/PICT0002.jpg[/IMG]
I bent the ring connector closed, reattached the antenna lead, and now I have great signal. Thought you would be interested in the pics.
I am going to call Lenovo and ask them to replace the wireless card, as there is no guarantee the connector is not damaged, but it is working fine for now.

Blackberry Link for Q10 with Outlook Sync has very poor performance and not good Functionality

I am wondering if anyone has tested this software. Blackberry Sync software for my previous phones were wonderful. I can sync my contacts and calender in a very short time. With this new Blackberry Link it takes about 1 1/2 hours Plus to complete. And when it does complete - it duplicates entries which I did not want.
Plus what is missing is the following:
1. I am not able to say Update both Device and Outlook any longer. This functionality is gone.
My question: How does it do a two way sync if I only have a choice to use what I have on my phone or on outlook only
I want to be able to update my Outlook contacts with changes and addition I made on my Q10 phone and update my device with changes I made to Outlook.
Why did Blackberry remove this very flexible choice? Plus Blackberry Link has very poor performance.
I work for a large company and I do Enterpirse Software testing daily. Performance is the number one complaint for customers on top of the UI and functionality.

Thanks for the reply.
OS: Windows 8.1 Pro 6.3.9600 Build 9600
Link: 1.2.3.23
BB Desktop: 7.1.0.41
Anti Virus: Avast 140312-0
Firewall: None
A thing I noticed when I opened Descktop Software for the first time since the new Z30 is that the old application thinks it is looking for a Z30. I havent even opened the application since before I got the new device. The only way it could think I have a Z30 is if it is using a lot of the same files as Blackberry Link. That is some pretty terrible software development practices in my opinion. I'm going to take your suggestion and uninstall both apps, run a registry cleaner and reinstall BB Link and I bet it works a lot better afterwards.
EDIT 12 March 2014 7PM EST
Still all of the same errors with regard to syncing outlook contacts and Schedules. I will post all of the error messages I recieve here as I see them. Application is always started by connecting device with USB cable.
"Sync was unseccessful
Caught _com_error exception. Description(): Error in MAPILogonEx: MAPI_E_CALL_FAILED; Error(): -2147467259 (0x80004005); ErrorMessage(): Unspecified error; Source(): XCPCRdmptn.RdRDOSession"
REBOOT
Change to sync contacts only, 1-way sync to computer, always use device data
"Sync was unsuccessful
CPreferencesManager: Configuration Value for /Preferences/Account_1_65537/DevicePin not set in TransConfig.xml for translator RimBB"
REBOOT
Application went through the whole process and hung for about 15 minutes and then completed successfuly syncing contacts only.
Change to callendar only. Sync completed successfuly. No hang or errors. very quick.
A new recurring appointment on the device was not transferred to the computer.
Sync callendar again, completed successfuly.
Appointment is still not transferred to computer.
So far I've spent an hour tonight trying to sync my contacts and appointment changes from just one day. I'm not thrilled.

Lenovo g510 poor performance

I have bought laptop Lenovo g510 series, i want to play some games on this laptop, but i cant run them on good graphics. It is impossible to run and play some of the new games. Help me configure my laptop, please. Also the fan is making noisy all the time, even i stay on desktop with no running process. The specs of the laptop are very good :
Windows 8.1
RAM 8 GB
HDD 1 TB
Video Intel graphics + amd radeon r5 m 200 series - 2 gb
CPU Intel core i5

Hi Immitrofanov,
Welcome to Lenovo Community!
As per the query we understood that you are facing issue with poor graphics in your G510 laptop.
Try to update the graphic driver and check for the issue.
Click here for the driver.
Hope this helps. Do post back if issue persists!
Best regards,
Ashwin.S
Did someone help you today? Press the star on the left to thank them with a Kudo!
If you find a post helpful and it answers your question, please mark it as an "Accepted Solution"! This will help the rest of the Community with similar issues identify the verified solution and benefit from it.
Follow @LenovoForums on Twitter!

Performanc of Firefox is poor after installing version 10.0.2 on Mac OS

I use an Imac with MacOS 10.5.8. Untill recently I used Firefx v9 without problems. After ignoring the urge to upgrade I finally installed Firefox 10.0.2 only to notice that performance now is very poor.
Are there any tips, preferences to tune to increase the performance to normal levels?
Kind regards

Hi DaanRemmers,
Have you looked at our [https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/firefox-slow-or-takes-too-long-start performance troubleshooting section]? There is a lot of good information in there that should help.
Hopefully this helps!

T410s with extremely poor performance and CPU always near 100% usage

Hi,
I've had my T410s for almost a year now and lately its been starting to get extremely slow, which is odd since it used to be so fast.
Just by opening one program, Outlook, or IE or Chrome, just one window, it will start to get extremely slow and on task manger I can clearly see the CPU usage at 100% or very near.
Also another thing I noticed was the performance index on the processor dropped from 6.8 to 3.6!!!
I did a clean Windows 7 Pro 64Bit install, I have all Windows and Lenovo updates installed and the problem persits
What is happening and what should I do??
Thank you
Nuno

thank you again for your answer,
I've done that but hard drive health is also ok as you can see from the screenshot.
IAt the time of the screenshot I had just fineshed to boot up the laptop and it wasnt hot at all.
I am getting desperate here, I am unable to work with my T410s
Link to picture
Thank you
Nuno
Moderator note; picture(s) totalling >50K converted to link(s) Forum Rules

G570 Choppy Sound - Poor Performance

Hi I'm currently having a few issues with my laptop All drivers are up to date
They all seem to happen at the same time so I believe its a internal issue
A lot of the time lately randomly my sound will get really choppy a static sound right when that happens the computer will have terrible performance doing anything ive run system restore to factory setting but that seems to only fix temporary. Also i have alot of trouble restarting the system a lot of the time It gets stuck on starting windows 7...
Not sure if relevant but month after buying it the keyboard went out completely but i was able to fix with restoring to factory settings...
I hope someone can find the problem :/ I will be unable to respond until later tonight will be going to work soon thx for help
Moderator Note; subject edited to reflect the content

Hi Brandon045 and welcome to the community,
Is your problem anything like this thread ?
What antivirus are you running? Any 3rd party firewalls? You might want to open your resource monitor and see what the processor usage is when this happens.
Dave
T430u, x301, x200T, x61T, x61, x32, x41T, x40, U160, ThinkPad Tablet 1838-22R, Z500 touch, Yoga Tab 2 Windows 8.1, Yoga Tablet 3 Pro
Did someone help you today? Press the star on the left to thank them with a Kudo!
If you find a post helpful and it answers your question, please mark it as an "Accepted Solution"!
If someone helped you today, pay it forward. Help Someone Else!
English Community Deutsche Community Comunidad en Español Русскоязычное Сообщество

Poor reflective memory read performance

I'm having some trouble with the GE 5565 PIORC reflective memory set of VIs for use with our reflective memory setup. I need to copy a pretty sizable chunk of memory out of reflective memory and into a DLL I've written, but the performance on the "GE 5565 PIORC:GE5565 Read (Cluster).vi" is not where I need it. I need to copy somewhere in the realm of 12k out of reflective memory at a high frequency, but the call to read those 12k takes longer than the period I need to gather the data at. I apologize in advance for the image-heavy post, but I think it's worth it to show what I've got.
Here's a picture of my setup to benchmark the Read call runtime:
Here's a graph of runtimes of that Read call, in microseconds:
I need it to run in way less than 16 ms, which doesn't seem unreasonable to me for only 12k. I did fool around with the DMA version of the Read (which I don't really understand, and the documentation is nonexistent as far as I can tell). Here's my test setup:
And here's a chart similar to the one above:
Way better, though I have no idea if it even does what I think it should So, I have a few questions. First, is there any way to get better performance out of that Read VI? Some other library I should be using, some setting I should be setting, some other way I should be benchmarking its performance, maybe even some way of doing this with another DLL? Second, if the Read can't achieve the performance I need, what's up with the DMA version, and how would I use it properly? Is the performance advantage that it appears to be giving real, or just an artifact of some mistaken way in which I'm using it? Thanks!

Hi dgoes
Windows is not a deterministic operating system so the loop cycle time that you are getting might be the best time that the windows system can achieve. In order to benchmark your code you can also use the input node and the output node of the timed loop. Check the following link.
Timed Loop
But it will be nice to know if you are working on a real time operating system or windows? Because unfortunately the windows operating system is not a deterministic system so the time loop might not work as expected. Here are a couple of links with information about this.
windows 1KHz time loop limitation reason
What is a Real-Time Operating System (RTOS)?
Which driver are you using for the GE 5565 PIORC? Is it this one?
GE 5565 PIORC
If it is, please notice that this driver is neither supported nor certified by National Instruments. This card is supported with NI VeriStand. Please check the information on the following links.
Getting Started With the GE cPCI-5565PIORC Reflective Memory Module
GE cPCI-5565PIORC
I hope that this information answer your questions.
Regards
Esteban R.

Poor LV6.1 webserver performanc​e

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for

Poor LV6.1 webserver performance