Poor Panasonic Lumix LX3 RAW color in LR2.5

Hello,
I just bought a Panasonic Lumix LX3.  I'm using Lightroom v2.5 to process the RAWs under Mac OS 10.6.2.  The color in the LX3 jpegs is very good/accurate, but when I open most RAWs it is taking me a lot of work to get accurate color, especially if there is any blue sky in them, as Lightroom seems to be rendering some colors incorrectly.  It's taking me way too much work to get my RAWs to look as good as the jpegs, which pretty much negates the RAW files' greater potential!  I have used Lightroom with my Canon 20D and never had this problem.  Also, with the LX3's supplied RAW software, SilkyPix, I don't have the RAW color issues.  I want to use Lightroom with my LX3's RAWs, but it is very frustrating.  Any thoughts or comments would be most helpful.
Thanks,
Greg

I have also had the same color rendering problems with LX3 and LR 2.4-2.6. The JPEG and initial preview looks fine, but the LR raw rendering just doesn't look good.
One solution I tried was to buy a Gretag Macbeth color checker (24 patch) and create a DNG profile for the LX3 using DNG Profile Editor from Adobe. This makes the color rednition significantly better, but the warm color spectrum is still a problem when it comes to high saturated areas.
I still haven't found what I'm looking for...
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
David

Similar Messages

  • Panasonic Lumix FZ1000 RAW files support in Lightroom 4

      http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2014/07/camera-raw-8-6-and-dng-converter-8-6-now-a vailable.html
    The above says that Panasonic Lumix FZ1000 RAW files are supported in camera raw 8.6.  I specifically checked before buying the camera.  Everything I have ever read on the Adobe website for some 3+ years said that if a file in supported in Adobe Camera RAW, it is also supported in Lightroom.  Particularly, the above URL did NOT give any warning about the FZ10000 RAW files NOT being supported in Lightroom 4.  I went ahead and purchased the FZ1000, only to find I'm now having problem with Lightroom 4 not recognising the RAW files at all.  I'm really annoyed, as I was so careful to check the Adobe website first.  WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON WITH CAMERA RAW AND LIGHTROOM?????

    I do appreciate the many RAW file formats being created by the camera manufacturers, as I have had varying cameras with the varying formats, and so am very aware of the whole business of making sure how those formats will fit into my software.  And, as already stated, appreciate Adobe's efforts to deal with all those formats.
    This whole exercise has been upsetting, and there has been some good advice and info provided in this discussion. 
    And unfortunately, some input that has been a little too technical and not particularly helpful.  I feel that some of the input was a little too critical and didn't recognise that maybe some of us aren't so are highly involved and knowledgeable in Adobe products and the technicalities of how the software works, dot versioning of software, executable coding etc. because we don't need to, and shouldn't have to.  I have bothered to learn Lightroom well in terms of its functionality including matters raised by you (eg making LRoom edits visible in other software, knowing that LR is not making changes to the actual files, rather they are in sidecar or xmp files etc.).  I have bothered to learn a reasonable amount of computer-related info to understand things in plain English terms, such as "to have PShop and LRoom to recognise my RAW files, I need to have ACR.  To have them run on my PC, they must be compatible with Windows operating system version xxx.  For many people, this level of knowledge should be enough.
    I have NOT said I expect Adobe to get advance copies of file formats from manufacturers;  I have NOT said that I expect Adobe to support every new camera model immediately.
    The technicalities of the coding and whether Lightroom "uses" the ACR plug in or not is not quite so much the issue, and I don't find the statement that "Lightroom does not use the Camera Raw plug-in" helpful.  I don't think it's really right either.  Lightroom - one way or the other - DOES "USE" ACR as the ability of Lightroom to recognise files is very much dependent on the version of ACR that you have.  LRoom may not use the ACR plug in as PShop/Bridge in the exact same way (eg for the actual editing of files such as exposure, white balance etc.), but Lightroom DOES USE the ACR PLUG IN.... in regard to the file recognition issue.
    And Yes....  I made a mistake.  Somehow, despite what I thought were good efforts to research the Lumix's support in PShop CS6, Bridge, ACR and Lroom 4, I got it wrong.  I will accept that it was my mistake and I'll accept my part in this, but I won't be made to feel that that it's been "totally" my fault, stupidity, whatever. 
    Thanks to all the people who have provided useful comment and input to my original question and subsequent responses throughout this discussion.  I will indeed now consider options like the DNG converter.  I was aware of the whole cloud thing, and had been thinking I would upgrade in perhaps a couple of years time (for both Pshop and LRoom) - I'll have to consider upgrading sooner rather than later. 

  • Does  PSE 12 and PSE 13 support Panasonic Lumix Fz200 raw files?

    Does PSE 12 and PSE 13 support Panasonic Lumix Fz200 raw files?

    Yes.
    See that FAQ: Photoshop Elements FAQ List
    In that list you find:
    FAQ: Will Photoshop Elements work with my camera, or Why won't my raw files open?
    And in that paper, you find two links, one for supported cameras:
    https://helpx.adobe.com/creative-suite/kb/camera-raw-plug-supported-cameras.html
    and ACR versions compatible with different Elements versions:
    https://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/global/camera-raw-compatible-applications.html

  • Lumix LX3 RAW support - Aperture update 2-10-2010

    So I was all excited to see that Aperture would finally support LX3 RAW files, so I took a bunch yesterday and guess what...it doesn't work.
    Can someone tell me why the update listed the RAW support for the Lumix LX3 RAW ?

    I downloaded your link to the upgrade again, it installed but still doesn't work.
    Of course not. As I said above
    Are you using Aperture 3 or iPhoto 09?
    They're the requirements as made clear here...
    You need to be using Aperture 3.
    I am using 2.1.4 on OSX 10.6.2
    And it will never work with Aperture 2.
    Regards
    TD

  • Why can't i open my Panasonic Lumix FZ45 RAW files in CS3?

    why can't i open my RAW files?
    I have photoshop CS3 with camera raw plug-in 4.6.0.30 on MacBook Pro OS X Lion 10.7.5 (11G63) and a Panasonic Lumix FZ45
    I have checked the list of supported cameras and mine appears to be there.
    I have no available updates in photoshop so assume that I am up to date with those.
    Anyone have any ideas?
    thanks

    I have checked the list of supported cameras and mine appears to be there.
    Yes, the Panasonic FZ45 is listed but it was first supported by Adobe Camera Raw (ACR) 6.2.
    http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-suite/kb/camera-raw-plug-supported-cameras.html
    Then go to this table to see which versions of Photoshop are compatible with ACR 6.2: CS5 and later. Not CS3.
    http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/global/camera-raw-compatible-applications.html
    So your options are to upgrade to CS6 or subscribe to CC (check out the Photoshop Photography Program: PS CC + Lightroom 5).
    Or download the free DNG converter, convert all your FZ75 Raw files to DNGs then open the DNGs in CS3
    http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop/extend.displayTab2.html

  • Download of latest Camera Raw to support Panasonic Lumix GX7 raw files

    I have downloaded the latest Camera Raw version for my Photoshop CS 5.1 as I have bought a new camera, Panasonic Lumix GX7.  Camera Raw still does not read these files in spite of the fact that the camera list shows that this camera is supported.  Please help. 

    According to Adobe’s list, you need at least ACR 8.2 to process GX7 raw files:
    http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-suite/kb/camera-raw-plug-supported-cameras.html
    According to this other list, you need at least CS6 to update to ACR 8.2:
    http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/global/camera-raw-compatible-applications.html
    So you either need to upgrade to PS-CS6 or sign-up for a cloud subscription, or download the latest DNG Converter that works with whatever OS version you have, from here:
    http://www.adobe.com/downloads/updates

  • A3 and Panasonic Lumix LX3 - recommended

    Hi there,
    just for those who own a Lumix LX3: I am blown away by the results I get from the RAW-files in Aperture 3. Not only have they finally included RAW support for my little gem, the results easily beat those of Lightroom. Especially noise - which can be quite a pain also at low ISO - is handled far better by A3 in my opinion.
    cheers

    yes, I have noticed this as well. Been waiting for it to be supported for such a long time and am very very happy that it now is and is this good

  • Panasonic Lumix LX3, shooting RAW with Film Modes

    I've been shooting RAW+JPEG and testing Film Modes (for example B&W) and noticed that RAW images will import "tabula rasa" without any of the Film Mode settings applied. JPEGs are naturally as supposed.
    I'm wondering if this is how it's supposed to work, as the RAW's first show a thumbail with Film Mode's settings, for example b&w first shows as b&w, but eventually Aperture processes a new thumbnail with standard raw settings. (I don't have previews on).
    I know raw is raw and you can't shoot it b&w, but I can't help thinking if there are some in-camera RAW settings that Aperture just doesn't know how to read and pre-apply when it's imported.
    The in-camera b&w settings would be nice starting point for further raw-editing in Aperture, but now one has to start from scratch.
    Anyone know if this is how it works, maybe with other cameras too?

    That's propably it. Only, I've read some reviews of LX3 that claim you can also shoot Film Modes in RAW. For example Mark Goldstein at photographyblog.com says:
    "This [=film mode] applies to both JPEG and RAW files, so you can effectively shoot a black and white RAW file, for example, out of the camera if you wish (although I'm not sure why you'd want to...). "
    This makes no sense to me as I believe you can only get one kind of RAW from a sensor, but it makes me wonder if there still should be a way to have some kind of B&W RAW straight from the camera and Aperture just doesn't know how to interpret it.
    I also agree with Goldstein that I wouldn't want it to shoot b&w destructively, but rather as a non-destructive "layer".
    Also the LX3 manual doesn't say a word that you couldn't use Film Modes when shooting RAW, and it's quite good at telling what is not applicable for certain modes.

  • Camera raw update 3.2 create issues with panasonic square LX3 raw

    Hi everybody,
    since I've installed the last camera raw update(ie 3.2), my square raw from my panasonic LX3 are not recognised anymore by snow leopard, I can't even get a preview on any of my square raw.
    As it was working perfectly before this update, is there a way to remove this update?
    Can you reproduce this issue?
    thanks for your attention

    I have the Leica D Lux 4 and it does the same thing with my camera using 1:1 aspect ratio. I've since rolled the raw update back to version 3 and all is normal again. If you read this thread, it explains how to roll back the raw update.
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=11157435&#11157435
    Andy

  • Panasonic Lumix G6 RAW files

    Hi ive just got a lumix g6 but my emements 9 will not open them. Ive tried updating elements but it says it up to date.

    masalmon
    http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-suite/kb/camera-raw-plug-supported-cameras.html
    It would appear that your Panasonic G6 was not supported until Camera Raw 8.1 which is not supported by your Premiere Elements 9.0/9.0.1.
    Even if it were, you might run your version blocking the raw image import because of size.
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/624979
    The above is a Premiere Elements 8.0/8.0.1 thread, but it is applicable to version 9.0/9.0.1 as well.
    Please review and consider.
    Thanks.
    ATR
    Add On....You can use raw and dng images in Premiere Elements, provided that you have installed a version of Camera Raw that supports your camera AND Premiere Elements supports that version of Camera Raw. In earlier versions of the program, such as version 9.0/9.0.1, there was also the size factor as mentioned above. The results are good with all the above ifs in place.

  • Panasonic Lumix GH4 RAW Support

    hi,
    i am waiting for the support of Panasonic's RAW format in iOS. the format is supported on the MacOS, but not in iOS. any experience how long I have to wait? how quickly does Apple implement new formats?
    kind regards
    Stefan

    hi,
    i am waiting for the support of Panasonic's RAW format in iOS. the format is supported on the MacOS, but not in iOS. any experience how long I have to wait? how quickly does Apple implement new formats?
    kind regards
    Stefan

  • How do I get RAW Support for Panasonic Lumix L10 camera?

    Aperture 2.1 still does not support Panasonic Lumix L10 RAW nor jpegs (Adobe 4.3 RAW plug-in already does). Is there a workaround? Any help?

    cyntlee
    from
    http://www.apple.com/aperture/features/100.html
    Baseline DNG support
    Shooting RAW on a camera or camera back not natively supported by Mac OS X? Aperture lets you work with DNGs created from the RAW files generated by most cameras, increasing its breadth of support.
    Regards
    TD

  • I can no longer import raw files from my Panasonic Lumix LX5 into Aperture 3.3.2 - raw files from my other Canon cameras are fine. Am still running Lion - NOT Mountain Lion. Tried all available software updates - no joy. Any ideas please?

    I can no longer import raw files from my Panasonic Lumix LX5 into Aperture 3.3.2 - raw files from my other Canon cameras are fine. Am still running Lion (10.7.4) - NOT Mountain Lion. Tried all available software updates - all up to date apparently but still no joy. OS X Lion shows the LX5 as a supported file format. I dont want to have to upgrade to Mountain Lion just to see if this solves the problem. Any ideas please.

    Since when did this happen? Directly after you upgraded to Aperture 3.3.2?
    If it happened directly after the upgrade the problem may be, that the raw support for your camera got lost. For some posters it helped to register the raw support again, see this post by Alan Roseman:
    Aperture 3 preview of raw file greenish
    If this does not help, you may need to reinstall Lion to bring back the raw support.
    But if the problem occured independent of a new installation, ypu may have a problem with your camera or the card you are using. Have you tried to use a different card or to reformat the card in the camera?

  • Camera Raw update for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000

    Hi.
    I have Elements 11 and need to update it to open .raw files shot with the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000. I can't find the link where I can download the camera raw update.
    Can you please help me?
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    The FZ1000 requires camera raw 8.6 which is NOT compatible with PSE 11.
    You will need to upgrade to PSE 13 or use the DNG converter.
    DNG  Converter 8.7
    Mac – http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=5858
    Win – http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=5864
    Video tutorial
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bqGovpuihw
    Brian

  • Elements 11: Can't open raw files from Panasonic Lumix TZ60.  Will there be an update?

    I have downloaded the Silkypix developer studio software that came with my camera (Mac Version) BUT my main camera is the Nikon D7100 and am used to using Raw in Photoshop elements 11.  Will there be a Raw update which includes Panasonic Lumix TZ60 or will I have to use different raw converters?  Thanks for your help.

    The TZ60 needs the Adobe Camera Raw (ACR) plug-in version 8.4 or newer, which is only compatible with Elements 12, and only with OSX 10.7 or Windows 7 and newer. 
    If your computer and OS are new enough then you could upgrade to PSE12 and update PSE12 to use ACR 8.4 and be able to open the TZ60 raw files, but a new version of Elements usually comes out about this time every year, which means PSE13 is probably due out within a month so you might also wait a few weeks and upgrade to the newer version.
    In the interim, again if your computer and OS are new enough, you can download the DNG Converter 8.4 or higher (usually you’d just get the newest version which is currently 8.6) and use it to create DNGs from your raw files and those will open in the older PSE11 ACR plug-in.
    The DNG Converter is available, here:  http://www.adobe.com/downloads/updates
    And PSE12 is available, here:  http://www.adobe.com/downloads

Maybe you are looking for

  • ITunes won't sync all of my songs to my iPhone 4S

    When I sync to my iPhone 4S, it won't allow my to manually manage the music. The box can be checked, but other than that, nothing happens. On my phones music section, there are no options, other than voice memos, so I can't drag music to it. When I s

  • Trouble with burning a cd

    When I go to burn an Audio CD onto a CD that is able to have 80 minutes of music on it, iTunes says that the songs in the playlist will not fit on one CD but the total time is under 80 minutes.   Windows XP  

  • Notes not carried to Subprocess

    HI, A subprocess is being called from parent process, The Notes entered in parent process are not being carried out to subprocess. (Fuego.Lib.Notes are present under Work Item Detail panel --> Notes tab of Workspace) It will be great help, if yo can

  • Text Query Syntax

    I am brand new to Oracle Text. I am trying to do a where clause with CONTAINS with a pattern I want found ANDed to a pattern I want excluded (using NOT) from the results that the condition before the AND would return on its own. Example: select disti

  • Static methods, what for?

    What are static methods for? is there something that is not possible through methods associated with instances (non-static methods) ?