Poor performance of WD Abap/ Adobe

Dear sirs,
I would like to know if anybody of you have experienced very poor performance of WD ABAP with Adobe interactive form. Our client has paid for a 2-3 pages interactive form in WDA and is complaining about very poor performace. As a result no users are using this application because of this poor performance.
Can anybody point out what can be a problem? Some developement problem? Basis issue? Any experience related to WDA Adobe performance? Thank you all, Otto

Update: SAP OSS message was opened regarding this problem.
We got a list of patches to update, notes to apply etc. All was done, applied, patched. The performance didn´t get better, it anything it was like extra percent or two, but nothing what would make the customer less angry.
The result: this technology is promising but a) needs strong client PC b) will get better (i hope gets better soon)
Our basis team checked all the times (of actions that has to be done to load/use the app) and the memory need both on server and client. On some client PCs only the Adobe Rader was starting like a half a minute (and more, not less). If you add time for WD, for WD/ Adobe communication and the data transfer, the time to start working with WD ABAP Adobe app can be more than a minute. That is not very usable.
Otto

Similar Messages

Adobe Reader XI Shows Poor Performance.

Hi there!
I've been using acrobat for a few years now , but the Acrobat Reader XI , its showing poor performance rendering a Big PDF file Like 2.8MB (its a MS Proyect Exported Document)..and I have tested it with another PDF viewers and it works fine. Any AR Bug maybe. FYI it complete freezes the Computer. (Im using a Core i3 W7 Pro x64 bits , 4GB , so the PC is not the problem) . I have tested in 2 pcs and i got the same results.

I just posted the below on another discussion. But read below and give it a try.
I am running Windows 7 64-bit with Adobe Reader 11.0.3 and am experiencing the same issue. Opening PDFs takes a long time and there is a delay and it freezes for a period of time and then it will unfreeze and becomes available.
What I have found to be the issue in my case is that Protected Mode is enabled. If you open Adobe Reader and click on Edit and Preferences then go to the section Security (Enhanced). You can turn "Enable Protected Mode at Startup" off by unchecking the check box.
After that give it a try and see if that doesn't clear up the issue.
I hope Adobe provides and update or new release to address this issue as it seems to be a problem with quite a lot of folks. Not sure what is causing it but it shouldn't be that way. Our users are chomping at the bit to turn it off but I am telling them not to for now as I hope there is an update soon to fix and address the problem.
And don't tell me to turn it off and keep it off either as that is NOT a solution.
Anyway - hope it helps.

General poor performance of my Mac mini

I have been using my mac mini for over a year, it continues to frustrate me how slow and unresponsive it can be even though I do very little with it, i.e organise photos and browse the web - usually looking for solutions to the poor performance problem!
I came a cross this app that has given me lots of information, unfortunately with my limited IT know-how there is nothing here that gives me any clues, as to the cause of the problem. I guess the red font is not good?
I'm sorry i can't be more specific about the problem other than to say that iPhoto and Safari the two programmes i use way more often than any other, keep giving me the beach ball. My internet speed is ok 25 Mbps down - 4.5 Mbps
Is there anything here that stands out as being wrong? if so any suggestions/ instructions for what I should do?
p.s. i had to quit Safari while writing this and have a report for this if it helps?
Any help much appreciated.
Problem description:
My mac is just generally very slow. I only use it to look at the internet and manage photos.
EtreCheck version: 2.1.5 (108)
Report generated 3 January 2015 16:03:59 GMT
Click the [Support] links for help with non-Apple products.
Click the [Details] links for more information about that line.
Click the [Adware] links for help removing adware.
Hardware Information: ℹ️
Mac mini (Late 2012) (Verified)
Mac mini - model: Macmini6,2
1 2.3 GHz Intel Core i7 CPU: 4-core
4 GB RAM Upgradeable
BANK 0/DIMM0
2 GB DDR3 1600 MHz ok
BANK 1/DIMM0
2 GB DDR3 1600 MHz ok
Bluetooth: Good - Handoff/Airdrop2 supported
Wireless: en1: 802.11 a/b/g/n
Video Information: ℹ️
Intel HD Graphics 4000
DELL U2412M 1920 x 1200
System Software: ℹ️
OS X 10.10.1 (14B25) - Uptime: 5 days 22:14:3
Disk Information: ℹ️
APPLE HDD HTS541010A9E662 disk0 : (1 TB)
EFI (disk0s1) <not mounted> : 210 MB
Macintosh HD (disk0s2) / : 999.35 GB (759.01 GB free)
Recovery HD (disk0s3) <not mounted> [Recovery]: 650 MB
USB Information: ℹ️
HP Photosmart B110 series
Apple Inc. BRCM20702 Hub
Apple Inc. Bluetooth USB Host Controller
Apple, Inc. IR Receiver
Thunderbolt Information: ℹ️
Apple Inc. thunderbolt_bus
Gatekeeper: ℹ️
Mac App Store and identified developers
Problem System Launch Daemons: ℹ️
[killed] com.apple.AssetCacheLocatorService.plist
[killed] com.apple.coreservices.appleid.passwordcheck.plist
[killed] com.apple.ctkd.plist
[killed] com.apple.wdhelper.plist
[killed] com.apple.xpc.smd.plist
5 processes killed due to memory pressure
Launch Daemons: ℹ️
[loaded] com.adobe.fpsaud.plist [Support]
User Login Items: ℹ️
iTunesHelper Application (/Applications/iTunes.app/Contents/MacOS/iTunesHelper.app)
Dropbox Application (/Applications/Dropbox.app)
Wondershare Helper Compact Application (/Users/[redacted]/Library/Application Support/Helper/Wondershare Helper Compact.app)
Internet Plug-ins: ℹ️
Silverlight: Version: 5.1.30514.0 - SDK 10.6 [Support]
FlashPlayer-10.6: Version: 16.0.0.235 - SDK 10.6 [Support]
Flash Player: Version: 16.0.0.235 - SDK 10.6 [Support]
QuickTime Plugin: Version: 7.7.3
Unity Web Player: Version: UnityPlayer version 4.5.5f1 - SDK 10.6 [Support]
Default Browser: Version: 600 - SDK 10.10
3rd Party Preference Panes: ℹ️
Flash Player [Support]
Time Machine: ℹ️
Auto backup: YES
Volumes being backed up:
Macintosh HD: Disk size: 999.35 GB Disk used: 240.33 GB
Destinations:
Time Capsule [Network]
Total size: 2.00 TB
Total number of backups: 56
Oldest backup: 2014-09-30 04:29:13 +0000
Last backup: 2015-01-03 15:37:35 +0000
Size of backup disk: Adequate
Backup size 2.00 TB > (Disk used 240.33 GB X 3)
Top Processes by CPU: ℹ️
    110% com.apple.WebKit.Plugin.64
      6% WindowServer
      1% Activity Monitor
      1% coreaudiod
      1% sysmond
Top Processes by Memory: ℹ️
1.11 GB com.apple.WebKit.Plugin.64
73 MB iTunes
49 MB com.apple.WebKit.WebContent
39 MB mds
39 MB WindowServer
Virtual Memory Information: ℹ️
68 MB Free RAM
1.07 GB Active RAM
1.02 GB Inactive RAM
893 MB Wired RAM
63.93 GB Page-ins
2.15 GB Page-outs
Diagnostics Information: ℹ️
Jan 1, 2015, 11:43:39 AM /Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports/com.apple.WebKit.Plugin.64_2015-01-01-114339_[r edacted].cpu_resource.diag [Details]
Jan 1, 2015, 11:32:46 AM /Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports/WindowServer_2015-01-01-113246_[redacted].crash
Jan 1, 2015, 11:00:30 AM /Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports/com.apple.WebKit.Plugin.64_2015-01-01-110030_[r edacted].cpu_resource.diag [Details]
Jan 1, 2015, 10:19:03 AM /Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports/iBooks_2015-01-01-101903_[redacted].cpu_resourc e.diag [Details]

Hi Linc Davis
Thank you for taking the time to respond.
I got this information from a time when I was opening up iPhoto, and then going to the iCloud folder. To be honest it wasn't the most disastrous of events, I did get a few beachballs and when I opened up a shared folder the photos weren't loaded as normal. As I get more lengthy delays in carrying out any activities I will post back the console results.
Just as a bit more info, I don't consider my problem an update to Yosemite problem, if anything since updating performance has been improved from Mavericks.
Do you have any comments about upgrading RAM from the 4GB I have?
Should I act on any of the messages in red from the EtreCheck report?
Many Thanks
Duncan
03/01/2015 19:30:18.331 com.apple.iCloudHelper[12481]: objc[12481]: Class FALogging is implemented in both /System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/FamilyCircle.framework/Versions/A/FamilyCircl e and /System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/FamilyNotification.framework/Versions/A/Famil yNotification. One of the two will be used. Which one is undefined.
03/01/2015 19:30:18.391 com.apple.xpc.launchd[1]: (com.apple.imfoundation.IMRemoteURLConnectionAgent) The _DirtyJetsamMemoryLimit key is not available on this platform.
03/01/2015 19:30:19.162 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: called
03/01/2015 19:30:19.162 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: entering
03/01/2015 19:30:19.163 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: called
03/01/2015 19:30:19.163 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: entering
03/01/2015 19:30:19.186 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: called
03/01/2015 19:30:19.187 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: entering
03/01/2015 19:30:19.188 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: called
03/01/2015 19:30:19.188 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: entering
03/01/2015 19:30:19.188 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: called
03/01/2015 19:30:19.188 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: entering
03/01/2015 19:30:25.446 WindowServer[7810]: common_reenable_update: UI updates were finally reenabled by application "iPhoto" after 10.70 seconds (server forcibly re-enabled them after 1.00 seconds)
03/01/2015 19:30:33.548 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase MayBegin (128), but previous was 1 (not 0, Cancelled or End)
03/01/2015 19:30:33.919 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Began (1), but previous was 1 (not 0, MayBegin or End)
03/01/2015 19:30:34.077 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Ended (4), but previous was 4 (not Began)
03/01/2015 19:30:34.605 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase MayBegin (128), but previous was 1 (not 0, Cancelled or End)
03/01/2015 19:30:34.774 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Began (1), but previous was 1 (not 0, MayBegin or End)
03/01/2015 19:30:34.853 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Ended (4), but previous was 4 (not Began)
03/01/2015 19:30:47.562 pkd[12123]: FCIsAppAllowedToLaunchExt [343] -- *** _FCMIGAppCanLaunch timed out. Returning false.
03/01/2015 19:31:10.695 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase MayBegin (128), but previous was 1 (not 0, Cancelled or End)
03/01/2015 19:31:10.807 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Began (1), but previous was 1 (not 0, MayBegin or End)
03/01/2015 19:31:16.961 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Ended (4), but previous was 4 (not Began)
03/01/2015 19:31:18.514 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase MayBegin (128), but previous was 1 (not 0, Cancelled or End)
03/01/2015 19:31:18.593 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Began (1), but previous was 1 (not 0, MayBegin or End)
03/01/2015 19:31:22.538 discoveryd[49]: Basic Sockets SetDelegatePID() failed for PID[3491] errno[3] result[-1]
03/01/2015 19:31:27.912 mds[32]: (DiskStore.Normal:2376) 6052001 1.780097
03/01/2015 19:31:56.831 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Ended (4), but previous was 4 (not Began)
03/01/2015 19:31:57.224 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase MayBegin (128), but previous was 1 (not 0, Cancelled or End)
03/01/2015 19:31:57.281 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Began (1), but previous was 1 (not 0, MayBegin or End)
03/01/2015 19:31:57.405 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Ended (4), but previous was 4 (not Began)
03/01/2015 19:31:58.507 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase MayBegin (128), but previous was 1 (not 0, Cancelled or End)
03/01/2015 19:31:58.541 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Began (1), but previous was 1 (not 0, MayBegin or End)
03/01/2015 19:31:59.160 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Ended (4), but previous was 4 (not Began)
03/01/2015 19:32:09.891 com.apple.InputMethodKit.UserDictionary[12456]: -[PFUbiquitySetupAssistant canReadFromUbiquityRootLocation:](1492): CoreData: Ubiquity: Error attempting to read ubiquity root url: file:///Users/Duncan/Library/Mobile%20Documents/com~apple~TextInput/Dictionarie s/.
Error: Error Domain=NSCocoaErrorDomain Code=134323 "The operation couldn’t be completed. (Cocoa error 134323.)" UserInfo=0x7f90e152a380 {NSAffectedObjectsErrorKey=<PFUbiquityLocation: 0x7f90e152a2e0>: /Users/Duncan/Library/Mobile Documents/com~apple~TextInput}
userInfo: {
    NSAffectedObjectsErrorKey = "<PFUbiquityLocation: 0x7f90e152a2e0>: /Users/Duncan/Library/Mobile Documents/com~apple~TextInput";
03/01/2015 19:32:12.862 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Began (1), but previous was 1 (not 0, MayBegin or End)
03/01/2015 19:32:20.818 com.apple.SecurityServer[53]: Killing auth hosts
03/01/2015 19:32:20.819 com.apple.SecurityServer[53]: Session 100281 destroyed
03/01/2015 19:32:20.974 com.apple.SecurityServer[53]: Session 100577 created
03/01/2015 19:32:34.833 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Ended (4), but previous was 4 (not Began)
03/01/2015 19:32:35.767 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase MayBegin (128), but previous was 1 (not 0, Cancelled or End)
03/01/2015 19:32:35.789 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Began (1), but previous was 1 (not 0, MayBegin or End)
03/01/2015 19:32:35.980 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Ended (4), but previous was 4 (not Began)
03/01/2015 19:32:36.273 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Began (1), but previous was 1 (not 0, MayBegin or End)
03/01/2015 19:32:36.487 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Ended (4), but previous was 4 (not Began)
03/01/2015 19:32:47.035 WindowServer[7810]: disable_update_timeout: UI updates were forcibly disabled by application "iPhoto" for over 1.00 seconds. Server has re-enabled them.
03/01/2015 19:32:50.555 WindowServer[7810]: common_reenable_update: UI updates were finally reenabled by application "iPhoto" after 4.52 seconds (server forcibly re-enabled them after 1.00 seconds)
03/01/2015 19:32:51.578 WindowServer[7810]: disable_update_timeout: UI updates were forcibly disabled by application "iPhoto" for over 1.00 seconds. Server has re-enabled them.
03/01/2015 19:32:52.745 WindowServer[7810]: common_reenable_update: UI updates were finally reenabled by application "iPhoto" after 2.17 seconds (server forcibly re-enabled them after 1.00 seconds)
03/01/2015 19:32:53.098 mds[32]: (DiskStore.Normal:2376) 6052001 1.279589
03/01/2015 19:33:03.332 BezelServices 245.23[7816]: ASSERTION FAILED: dvcAddrRef != ((void *)0) -[DriverServices getDeviceAddress:] line: 2602
03/01/2015 19:33:03.332 BezelServices 245.23[7816]: ASSERTION FAILED: dvcAddrRef != ((void *)0) -[DriverServices getDeviceAddress:] line: 2602
03/01/2015 19:33:11.961 mds[32]: (DiskStore.Normal:2376) 6052001 1.939804
03/01/2015 19:33:29.541 WindowServer[7810]: disable_update_timeout: UI updates were forcibly disabled by application "iPhoto" for over 1.00 seconds. Server has re-enabled them.
03/01/2015 19:33:32.354 WindowServer[7810]: common_reenable_update: UI updates were finally reenabled by application "iPhoto" after 3.81 seconds (server forcibly re-enabled them after 1.00 seconds)
03/01/2015 19:33:44.549 discoveryd[49]: Basic DNSResolver dropping message because it doesn't match the one sent Port:53 MsgID:20602
03/01/2015 19:33:54.055 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase MayBegin (128), but previous was 1 (not 0, Cancelled or End)
03/01/2015 19:34:05.143 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: called
03/01/2015 19:34:05.143 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: entering
03/01/2015 19:34:05.165 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: called
03/01/2015 19:34:05.165 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: entering
03/01/2015 19:34:05.165 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: called
03/01/2015 19:34:05.166 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: entering
03/01/2015 19:34:05.166 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: called
03/01/2015 19:34:05.166 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: entering
03/01/2015 19:34:05.166 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: called
03/01/2015 19:34:05.166 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: entering
03/01/2015 19:34:05.166 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: called
03/01/2015 19:34:05.166 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: entering
03/01/2015 19:34:05.166 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: called
03/01/2015 19:34:05.166 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: entering
03/01/2015 19:34:05.166 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: called
03/01/2015 19:34:05.166 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: entering
03/01/2015 19:34:05.499 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: called
03/01/2015 19:34:05.499 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: entering
03/01/2015 19:34:07.001 discoveryd[49]: Basic Sockets SetDelegatePID() failed for PID[3491] errno[3] result[-1]
03/01/2015 19:34:13.809 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase MayBegin (128), but previous was 1 (not 0, Cancelled or End)
03/01/2015 19:34:13.821 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Began (1), but previous was 1 (not 0, MayBegin or End)
03/01/2015 19:34:14.124 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Ended (4), but previous was 4 (not Began)
03/01/2015 19:34:14.766 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase MayBegin (128), but previous was 1 (not 0, Cancelled or End)
03/01/2015 19:34:14.867 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Began (1), but previous was 1 (not 0, MayBegin or End)
03/01/2015 19:34:17.769 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Ended (4), but previous was 4 (not Began)
03/01/2015 19:34:18.186 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase MayBegin (128), but previous was 1 (not 0, Cancelled or End)
03/01/2015 19:34:18.186 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Began (1), but previous was 1 (not 0, MayBegin or End)

Poor performance and overheat

Story
I've been using arch for the past four months, dual booting with my old Windows XP. As I'm very fond of Flash games and make my own programs with a cross-platform language, I've found few problems with the migration. One of them was the Adobe Flash Player performance, which was stunningly bad. But everyone was saying that was normal, so I left it as is.
However, one special error always worried me: a seemingly randomly started siren sound coming from the motherboard speaker. Thinking it was a alarm about some fatal kernel error, I had been solving it mostly with reboots.
But then it happened. While playing a graphics intensive game on Windows quickly after rebooting from Arch, the same siren sound started. It felt like a slap across the face: it was not a kernel error, it was an motherboard overheat alarm.
The Problem
Since the computer was giving overheat signs, I started looking at things from another angle. I noticed that some tasks take unusually long times in Arch (i.e.: building things from source; Firefox / OpenOffice startup; any graphics intensive program), specially from the Flash Player.
A great example is the game Penguinz, that runs flawlessly in Windows but is unbearably slow in Arch. So slow that it alone caused said overheat twice. And trying to record another flash game's record using XVidCap things went so bad that the game halved the FPS and started ignoring key presses.
Tech Info
Dual Core 3.2 processor
1 gb RAM
256 mb Geforce FX 5500 video card
Running Openbox
Using proprietary NVIDIA driver
TL;DR: poor performance on some tasks. Flash Player is so slow that overheats CPU and makes me cry. It's fine on Windows.
Off the top of my head I can think up some reasons: bad video driver, unwanted background application messing up, known Flash Player performance problems and Actionscript Linux/Arch-only bug.
Where do you think is the problem?

jwcxz wrote:Have you looked at your process table for any program with abnormal CPU usage? That seems like the logical place to start. You shouldn't be getting poor performance in anything with that system. I have a 2.0GHz Core 2 Duo and an Intel GMA 965 and I've never had any problems with Flash. It's much better than it used to be.
Pidgin scared me for a while because it froze for no apparent reason. After fixing this, the table contains this two guys here:
%CPU
Firefox: 80%~100%
X: 0~20%
Graphic intensive test, so I think the X usage is normal. It might be some oddity at the Firefox+Linux+Flash sum, maybe a conflict. I'll try another browser.
EDIT:
Did a Javascript benchmark to test both systems and browsers.
Windows XP + Firefox = 4361.4ms
Arch + Firefox = 5146.0ms
So, it's actually a lot slower without even taking Flash into account. If someone knows a platform-independent benchmark to test both systems completely, and not only the browser, feel free to point out.
I think that something is already wrong here and the lack of power saving systems only aggravated the problem, causing overheat.
EDIT2:
Browser performance fixed: migrated to Midori. Flash stills slower than on Windows, but now it's bearable. Pretty neat browser too, goes better with the Arch Way. It shouldn't fix the temperature, however.
Applied B's idea, but didn't test yet. I'm not into the mood of playing flash games for two straight hours today.
Last edited by BoppreH (2009-05-03 04:25:20)

Poor performance of Premiere Pro on 2013 Mac Pro

A month ago I bought a 2013 Mac Pro mostly for running Premiere Pro CC. The configuration is 6 cores @ 3.5 GHz, 64 GB RAM, 2 x D700 graphics, 1 TB internal SSD. It runs OS X Mavericks 10.9.4.
I tried Premiere Pro CC today for the first time. The input--entirely stored on the internal SSD; no external disk was even connected--was about 100 clips shot as AVCHD (1080p25 PAL) at 24 Mbps.
I edited this in Premiere Pro and added small adjustments (mostly changes of levels) in about 20 clips. The rest had no adjustments. There were no transitions applied. For the most part, it just had to copy the trimmed input clips to the output.
I queued this for Adobe Media Encoder CC at H.264, 1080p25, @ 24 Mbps VBR 2 pass. Audio was 192 kbps, 48 kHZ,stereo. The output was written to the internal SSD.
While encoding, the CPU was running 50-70% idle (!!!) so it was using only 2-3 cores and half the memory (32GB) was unused. It certainly wasn't trying very hard. No other programs except Premiere, AME, and the activity monitor were open during encoding and I was just sitting there watching it lumber along.
The time to encode the timeline of 9:47 was 21:28. That is 2.2x real time. My 4-year-old Windows machine using CS6 could do that. What's wrong? Should Premiere Pro be this slow on hardware this fast? Is there some secret box "Use all the cores and all allowed memory" that I have to check (I set the preferences to allow Adobe to use 52 GB). Does Premiere get tired in the evenings? The internal SSD runs at 900 MB/s and there was no transcoding to do. What was going on?
This is my first test of Premiere and it is kind of disappointing. Did I just waste 6500 euros on the Mac Pro or am I using the wrong settings. Any advice is welcome.
Thanks.

Yes, should be great if someone put some light in all this performance thing in the new mac pro, I just did a test, 3 video tracks with 4K Red footage, 50% of opacity each one and I just play the 2 min sequence, and Premiere started to drop frames at half resolution playback and when I changed to full resolution playback the sequence was unplayable, I mean, they sold this MacPro/Premiere workflow as the way to edit 4K without compromises and now we are not capable to deliver jobs because the poor performance... and I'm not talking now about the constant crashes and freezes, I'm talking about that we can't play just 3 tracks without any effect.
Would be great if someone put some light on this, maybe we are blaming adobe and it's apple's fault and we should go to the apple store to return the machine... I did test on the Mac and looks OK, I'm more than confuse about this...

Illustrator CS6 12.0.1 Winx64: Crashing regularly while scrolling, general poor performance

Hey,
I am creating a simple reader app for Windows 8. I use very simple shapes, no appearence effects, many text styles, a few artboards and a few slices. The overall performance is very poor when scrolling around the document and dragging objects around. Changing text (typing) is also performing poorly.
Added to the poor performance, Illustrator regularly crashes when scrolling the document using the scrool bars or hand tool. It just dies with a crash report windows popping up. This happens several times a day.
I never had problems with CS5. All Mercury-run apps suffer from instability, Fireworks is dead due to out of memory... I mean, come on Adobe!

Uninstall everything again, run the cleaner tool and then reinstall. Before trying to open the applications, update all apps to their most recent version.

Significantly Poorer Performance in AIR 2.0 vs 1.5.X

The company I work for has a demonstration Adobe AIR application that we distribute to customers. We have not tested it under AIR 2.0 until today but after updating the frame-rate has degraded substantially from the 1.5.X releases. We tried recompiling with the latest SDKs but no luck in improving the poor performance. We are now dreading our customers upgrading to AIR 2.0. We will of course try digging deeper and solving the problem but I'd be happy to share the installer with anyone from the Adobe team if they would like to have a look at it since AIR 2.0 was meant to be out of the box faster.

I have the same problem with my application - ironically dropping the frame of my application (from 60fps to 30 fps) has the effect that it runs faster under air 2.0!
Wierd.
I hope you guys at Adobe can fix this.
Regards, Mark.

DOI - I_OI_SPREADSHEET, poor performance when reading more than 9999 record

Hi,
Please read this message in the [ABAP Performance and Tuning|DOI - I_OI_SPREADSHEET, poor performance when reading more than 9999 record; section and see if you have any advise.
Best Regards,
Marjo

Hi,
I met this issue when I tried to write vaule to massive fields of excel range.
And I solve this issue by using CL_GUI_FRONTEND_SERVICES=>CLIPBOARD_EXPORT.
So, I think you may fix it in the same way.
1. Select range in by the I_OI_SPREADSHEET
2. Call method I_OI_DOCUMENT_PROXY->COPY_SELECTION
3. Call method CL_GUI_FRONTEND_SERVICES=>CLIPBOARD_IMPORT
Cheers,

Poor performance of VL10A transaction

Hello Experts,
We are facing very poor performance in One of our production system in VL10A transaction
I checked for the response time and it is going up to 5 seconds
I checked for :
Table Space > it is fine
Pending updates ? it is fine
Available workprocesses > it is fine
Abap Dumps > no major issues.
Could any body suggest ??
Thank you
Regards,
Amber S

Hi
Try to get a working example of the transaction with poor performance. I would just run the transaction and monitor the work processes SM50 at same time. If you always see your request on a certain table, for example VEPVG, then I would take an SQL trace with transaction ST05.
If the process in SM50 is only on a table (-> accessing the database) for a short time, then you would investigate more on the Abap side.
Btw, if you did not modifiy anything, then you can always go to SAP support (-> look for SAP notes first!) as this is a standard functionality.
Best regards, Michael

WAD-Analysis Item-Poor performance for new lines

Hi.
I use WAD7 for entering new records in IP.
According to our business requirements, in analysis item properties I have defined "Number of New Lines in Planning Queries" = 50.
After that I face before extremely poor performance - it takes about 1-2 minutes until the page has loaded (note that it is empty page - only new blank rows).
When I define new lines = 1 performance is very good (2-3 sec).
Does anybody know what could be the problem ?
Thanks.

Hello Andrey,
the number of new lines configured in WAD is completely unknown in the ABAP backend and has no impact on backend performance; in fact, the front end gets information about one 'line' of template cells, this costs nothing.
Checks for characteristic relationships etc. only may have significant costs for cells of the result set, not for new lines.
Whether this problem comes from the ABAP backed or form the Java stack or from the browser rendering can be checked
with an RSTT trace. Is the run time of the trace different between 1 or 50 new lines, were different backend calls recorded?
If not, the problem comes from the Java stack or from the browser rendering. One can check the latter via task manager.
To check (partially) the run time in Java and/or ABAP stack add the parameter &PROFILING=X in the url, cf. note 1048691.
Regards,
Gregor

Poor performance when dragging item within a list loaded with images - Flex 4

Hi,
I have a custom built List component that is using a TileLayout. I am using a custom itemRenderer to load images into this list from our server (in this test, 44 images rae loaded). I have enabled dragEnabled and dragMove so that I can move items around within the list. The problem comes when I start dragging an item. The dragging operation is very slow and clunky.
When I move the mouse to drag the item, the dropIndicator does not get refreshed for a few seconds and the movement feels like my PC is lagging pretty badly. I've also noticed that during this time my CPU usage is spiking up to around 25-40%. The funny part is I can scroll the list just fine without any lag at all, but the minute I drag the application starts to lag really bad. I do have some custom dragOver code that I used to override the dragOverHandler of the list control, but the problem persists even if I take that code out. I've tried with useVirtualLayout set to both true and false and neither setting made a difference.
Any ideas as to what could be causing the poor performance and/or how I can go abouts fixing it?
Thanks a lot in advance!

Ahh, good call about the Performance profiler. I'm pretty new to the profiling thing with Flex (haven't used Builder Pro before
the Flex 4 beta) so please forgive me
I found some interesting things running the performance profiler but I'm not sure I understand what to make of it all. I cleared the Performance Profile data when right before I loaded the images into the list. I then moved some images around and then captured the Profiling Data (If I understand Adobe correctly, this is the correct way to capture performance information for a set of actions).
What I found is there is a [mouseEvent] item that took 3101ms with 1 "Calls" (!!!!). When I drill down into that item to see the Method Statistics, I actually see three different Callees and no callers. The sum of the time it took the Callees to execute does not even come close to adding up to the 3101 ms (about 40ms). I'm not sure what I can make of those numbers, or if they are even meaningful. Any insight into these?
The only other items that stand out to me are [pre-render] which has 863ms (Cumulative Time) / 639ms (Self Time), [enterFrameEvent] which has 746ms / 6ms (?!), and [tincan] (what the heck is tincan?) which has times of 521ms for both Cumulative and Self.
Can anyone offer some insight into these numbers and maybe make some more suggestions for me? I apologize for my ignorance on these numbers - as I said, I'm new to the whole Flex profiling thing.
Many thanks in advance!
Edit: I just did another check, this time profiling only from the start of my drag to the end of my drop, and I still see [mouseEvent] taking almost 1000ms of Cumulative Time. However, when I double click that item to see the Method Statistics, no Callers or Callees are listed. What's causing this [mouseEvent] and how come it's taking so long?

Apple maps has received a poor performance rating just after introduction of the iPhone 5. I am running google maps app on the phone. Siri cannot seem to get me to a specific address. Where does the problem lie? Thanks.

Apple maps has received a poor performance rating just after introduction of the iPhone 5. I am running Google Maps app on the phone. SIRI cannot seem to get me to a specific address. Where does the problem lie? Also can anyone tell me the hierarchy of use between the Apple Maps, SIRI, and Google maps when the app is on the phone? How do you choose one over the other as the default map usage? Or better still how do you suppress SIRI from using the Apple maps app when requesting a "go to"?
I have placed an address location into the CONTACTS list and when I ask SIRI to "take me there" it found a TOTALLY different location in the metro area with the same street name. I have included the address, the quadrant, (NE) and the ZIP code into the CONTACTS list. As it turns out, no amount of canceling the trip or relocating the address in the CONTACTS list line would prevent SIRI from taking me to this bogus location. FINALLY I typed in Northeast for NE in the CONTACTS list (NE being the accepted method of defining the USPS location quadrant) , canceled the current map route and it finally found the correct address. This problem would normally not demand such a response from me to have it fixed but the address is one of a hospital in the center of town and this hospital HAS a branch location in a similar part of town (NOT the original address SIRI was trying to take me to). This screw up could be dangerous if not catastrophic to someone who was looking for a hospital location fast and did not know of these two similar locations. After all the whole POINT of directions is not just whimsical pasttime or convenience. In a pinch people need to rely on this function. OR, are my expectations set too high?
How does the iPhone select between one app or the other (Apple Maps or Gppgle Maps) as it relates to SIRI finding and showing a map route?
Why does SIRI return an address that is NOT the correct address nor is the returned location in the requested ZIP code?
Is there a known bug in the CONTACTS list that demands the USPS quadrant ID be spelled out, as opposed to abreviated, to permit SIRI to do its routing?
Thanks for any clarification on these matters.

siri will only use apple maps, this cannot be changed. you could try google voice in the google app.

Poor performance of the BDB cache

I'm experiencing incredibly poor performance of the BDB cache and wanted to share my experience, in case anybody has any suggestions.
Overview
Stone Steps maintains a fork of a web log analysis tool - the Webalizer (http://www.stonesteps.ca/projects/webalizer/). One of the problems with the Webalizer is that it maintains all data (i.e. URLs, search strings, IP addresses, etc) in memory, which puts a cap on the maximum size of the data set that can be analyzed. Naturally, BDB was picked as the fastest database to maintain analyzed data on disk set and produce reports by querying the database. Unfortunately, once the database grows beyond the cache size, overall performance goes down the drain.
Note that the version of SSW available for download does not support BDB in the way described below. I can make the source available for you, however, if you find your own large log files to analyze.
The Database
Stone Steps Webalizer (SSW) is a command-line utility and needs to preserve all intermediate data for the month on disk. The original approach was to use a plain-text file (webalizer.current, for those who know anything about SSW). The BDB database that replaced this plain text file consists of the following databases:
sequences (maintains record IDs for all other tables)
urls -primary database containing URL data - record ID (key), URL itself, grouped data, such as number of hits, transfer size, etc)
urls.values - secondary database that contains a hash of the URL (key) and the record ID linking it to the primary database; this database is used for value lookups)
urls.hits - secondary database that contains the number of hits for each URL (key) and the record ID to link it to the primary database; this database is used to order URLs in the report by the number of hits.
The remaining databases are here just to indicate the database structure. They are the same in nature as the two described above. The legend is as follows: (s) will indicate a secondary database, (p) - primary database, (sf) - filtered secondary database (using DB_DONOTINDEX).
urls.xfer (s), urls.entry (s), urls.exit (s), urls.groups.hits (sf), urls.groups.xfer (sf)
hosts (p), hosts.values (s), hosts.hits (s), hosts.xfer (s), hosts.groups.hits (sf), hosts.groups.xfer (sf)
downloads (p), downloads.values (s), downloads.xfer (s)
agents (p), agents.values (s), agents.values (s), agents.hits (s), agents.visits (s), agents.groups.visits (sf)
referrers (p), referrers.values (s), referrers.values (s), referrers.hits (s), referrers.groups.hits (sf)
search (p), search.values (s), search.hits (s)
users (p), users.values (s), users.hits (s), users.groups.hits (sf)
errors (p), errors.values (s), errors.hits (s)
dhosts (p), dhosts.values (s)
statuscodes (HTTP status codes)
totals.daily (31 days)
totals.hourly (24 hours)
totals (one record)
countries (a couple of hundred countries)
system (one record)
visits.active (active visits - variable length)
downloads.active (active downloads - variable length)
All these databases (49 of them) are maintained in a single file. Maintaining a single database file is a requirement, so that the entire database for the month can be renamed, backed up and used to produce reports on demand.
Database Size
One of the sample Squid logs I received from a user contains 4.4M records and is about 800MB in size. The resulting database is 625MB in size. Note that there is no duplication of text data - only nodes and such values as hits and transfer sizes are duplicated. Each record also contains some small overhead (record version for upgrades, etc).
Here are the sizes of the URL databases (other URL secondary databases are similar to urls.hits described below):
urls (p):
8192 Underlying database page size
2031 Overflow key/data size
1471636 Number of unique keys in the tree
1471636 Number of data items in the tree
193 Number of tree internal pages
577738 Number of bytes free in tree internal pages (63% ff)
55312 Number of tree leaf pages
145M Number of bytes free in tree leaf pages (67% ff)
2620 Number of tree overflow pages
16M Number of bytes free in tree overflow pages (25% ff)
urls.hits (s)
8192 Underlying database page size
2031 Overflow key/data size
2 Number of levels in the tree
823 Number of unique keys in the tree
1471636 Number of data items in the tree
31 Number of tree internal pages
201970 Number of bytes free in tree internal pages (20% ff)
45 Number of tree leaf pages
243550 Number of bytes free in tree leaf pages (33% ff)
2814 Number of tree duplicate pages
8360024 Number of bytes free in tree duplicate pages (63% ff)
0 Number of tree overflow pages
The Testbed
I'm running all these tests using the latest BDB (v4.6) built from the source on Win2K3 server (release version). The test machine is 1.7GHz P4 with 1GB of RAM and an IDE hard drive. Not the fastest machine, but it was able to handle a log file like described before at a speed of 20K records/sec.
BDB is configured in a single file in a BDB environment, using private memory, since only one process ever has access to the database).
I ran a performance monitor while running SSW, capturing private bytes, disk read/write I/O, system cache size, etc.
I also used a code profiler to analyze SSW and BDB performance.
The Problem
Small log files, such as 100MB, can be processed in no time - BDB handles them really well. However, once the entire BDB cache is filled up, the machine goes into some weird state and can sit in this state for hours and hours before completing the analysis.
Another problem is that traversing large primary or secondary databases is a really slow and painful process. It is really not that much data!
Overall, the 20K rec/sec quoted above drop down to 2K rec/sec. And that's all after most of the analysis has been done, just trying to save the database.
The Tests
SSW runs in two modes, memory mode and database mode. In memory mode, all data is kept in memory in SSW's own hash tables and then saved to BDB at the end of each run.
In memory mode, the entire BDB is dumped to disk at the end of the run. First, it runs fairly fast, until the BDB cache is filled up. Then writing (disk I/O) goes at a snail pace, at about 3.5MB/sec, even though this disk can write at about 12-15MB/sec.
Another problem is that the OS cache gets filled up, chewing through all available memory long before completion. In order to deal with this problem, I disabled the system cache using the DB_DIRECT_DB/LOG options. I could see OS cache left alone, but once BDB cache was filed up, processing speed was as good as stopped.
Then I flipped options and used DB_DSYNC_DB/LOG options to disable OS disk buffering. This improved overall performance and even though OS cache was filling up, it was being flushed as well and, eventually, SSW finished processing this log, sporting 2K rec/sec. At least it finished, though - other combinations of these options lead to never-ending tests.
In the database mode, stale data is put into BDB after processing every N records (e.g. 300K rec). In this mode, BDB behaves similarly - until the cache is filled up, the performance is somewhat decent, but then the story repeats.
Some of the other things I tried/observed:
* I tried to experiment with the trickle option. In all honesty, I hoped that this would be the solution to my problems - trickle some, make sure it's on disk and then continue. Well, trickling was pretty much useless and didn't make any positive impact.
* I disabled threading support, which gave me some performance boost during regular value lookups throughout the test run, but it didn't help either.
* I experimented with page size, ranging them from the default 8K to 64K. Using large pages helped a bit, but as soon as the BDB cached filled up, the story repeated.
* The Db.put method, which was called 73557 times while profiling saving the database at the end, took 281 seconds. Interestingly enough, this method called ReadFile function (Win32) 20000 times, which took 258 seconds. The majority of the Db.put time was wasted on looking up records that were being updated! These lookups seem to be the true problem here.
* I tried libHoard - it usually provides better performance, even in a single-threaded process, but libHoard didn't help much in this case.

I have been able to improve processing speed up to
6-8 times with these two techniques:
1. A separate trickle thread was created that would
periodically call DbEnv::memp_trickle. This works
especially good on multicore machines, but also
speeds things up a bit on single CPU boxes. This
alone improved speed from 2K rec/sec to about 4K
rec/sec.Hello Stone,
I am facing a similar problem, and I too hope to resolve the same with memp_trickle. I had these queries.
1. what was the % of clean pages that you specified?
2. What duration were you clling this thread to call memp_trickle?
This would give me a rough idea about which to tune my app. Would really appreciate if you can answer these queries.
Regards,
Nishith.
>
2. Maintaining multiple secondary databases in real
time proved to be the bottleneck. The code was
changed to create secondary databases at the end of
the run (calling Db::associate with the DB_CREATE
flag), right before the reports are generated, which
use these secondary databases. This improved speed
from 4K rec/sec to 14K rec/sec.

Poor performance and high number of gets on seemingly simple insert/select

Versions & config:
Database : 10.2.0.4.0
Application : Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2
2 node RAC, IBM AIX 5.3Here's the insert / select which I'm struggling to explain why it's taking 6 seconds, and why it needs to get > 24,000 blocks:
INSERT INTO WF_ITEM_ATTRIBUTE_VALUES ( ITEM_TYPE, ITEM_KEY, NAME, TEXT_VALUE,
NUMBER_VALUE, DATE_VALUE ) SELECT :B1 , :B2 , WIA.NAME, WIA.TEXT_DEFAULT,
WIA.NUMBER_DEFAULT, WIA.DATE_DEFAULT FROM WF_ITEM_ATTRIBUTES WIA WHERE
WIA.ITEM_TYPE = :B1
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          4           0
Execute      2      3.44       6.36          2      24297        198          36
Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
total        3      3.44       6.36          2      24297        202          36
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Misses in library cache during execute: 2Also from the tkprof output, the explain plan and waits - virtually zero waits:
Rows     Execution Plan
      0 INSERT STATEMENT   MODE: ALL_ROWS
      0   TABLE ACCESS   MODE: ANALYZED (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'WF_ITEM_ATTRIBUTES' (TABLE)
      0    INDEX   MODE: ANALYZED (RANGE SCAN) OF 'WF_ITEM_ATTRIBUTES_PK' (INDEX (UNIQUE))
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on                             Times   Max. Wait Total Waited
----------------------------------------   Waited ---------- ------------
library cache lock                             12        0.00          0.00
gc current block 2-way                         14        0.00          0.00
db file sequential read                         2        0.01          0.01
row cache lock                                 24        0.00          0.01
library cache pin                               2        0.00          0.00
rdbms ipc reply                                 1        0.00          0.00
gc cr block 2-way                               4        0.00          0.00
gc current grant busy                           1        0.00          0.00
********************************************************************************The statement was executed 2 times. I know from slicing up the trc file that :
exe #1 : elapsed = 0.02s, query = 25, current = 47, rows = 11
exe #2 : elapsed = 6.34s, query = 24272, current = 151, rows = 25
If I run just the select portion of the statement, using bind values from exe #2, I get small number of gets (< 10), and < 0.1 secs elapsed.
If I make the insert into an empty, non-partitioned table, I get :
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute      1      0.01       0.08          0        137         53          25
Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
total        2      0.01       0.08          0        137         53          25and same explain plan - using index range scan on WF_Item_Attributes_PK.
This problem is part of testing of a database upgrade and country go-live. On a 10.2.0.3 test system (non-RAC), the same insert/select - using the real WF_Item_Attributes_Value table takes :
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute      1      0.00       0.10         10         27        136          25
Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
total        2      0.00       0.10         10         27        136          25So I'm struggling to understand why the performance on the 10.2.0.4 RAC system is so much worse for this query, and why it's doing so many gets. Suggestions, thoughts, ideas welcomed.
I've verified system level things - CPUs weren't/aren't max'd out, no significant paging/swapping activity, run queue not long. AWR report for the time period shows nothing unusual.
further info on the objects concerned:
query source table :
WF_Item_Attributes_PK : unique index on Item_Type, Name. Index has 144 blocks, non-partitioned
WF_Item_Attributes tbl : non-partitioned, 160 blocks
insert destination table:
WF_Item_Attribute_Values:
range partitioned on Item_Type, and hash sub-partitioned on Item_Key
both executions of the insert hit the partition with the most data : 127,691 blocks total ; 8 sub-partitions with 15,896 to 16,055 blocks per sub-partition.
WF_Item_Attribute_Values_PK : unique index on columns Item_Type, Item_Key, Name. Range/hash partitioned as per table.
Bind values:
exe #1 : Item_Type (:B1) = OEOH, Item_Key (:B2) = 1048671
exe #2 : Item_Type (:B1) = OEOL, Item_Key (:B2) = 4253168
number of rows in WF_Item_Attribute_Values for Item_Type = OEOH : 1132587
number of rows in WF_Item_Attribute_Values for Item_Type = OEOL : 18763670
The non-RAC 10.2.0.3 test system (clone of Production from last night) has higher row counts for these 2.
thanks and regards
Ivan

hi Sven,
Thanks for your input.
1) I guess so, but I haven't lifted the lid to delve inside the form as to which one. I don't think it's the cause though, as I got poor performance running the insert statement with my own value (same statement, using my own bind value).
2) In every execution plan I've seen, checked, re-checked, it uses a range scan on the primary key. It is the most efficient I think, but the source table is small in any case - table 160 blocks, PK index 144 blocks. So I think it's the partitioned destination table that's the problem - but we only see this issue on the 10.2.0.4 pre-production (RAC) system. The 10.2.0.3 (RAC) Production system doesn't have it. This is why it's so puzzling to me - the source table read is fast, and does few gets.
3) table storage details below - the Item_Types being used were 'OEOH' (fast execution) and 'OEOL' (slow execution). Both hit partition WF_ITEM49, hence I've only expanded the subpartition info for that one (there are over 600 sub-partitions).
============= From DBA_Part_Tables : Partition Type / Count =============
PARTITI SUBPART PARTITION_COUNT DEF_TABLESPACE_NAME
RANGE   HASH                 77 APPS_TS_TX_DATA
1 row selected.
============= From DBA_Tab_Partitions : Partition Names / Tablespaces =============
Partition Name       TS Name         High Value           High Val Len
WF_ITEM1             APPS_TS_TX_DATA 'A1'                            4
WF_ITEM2             APPS_TS_TX_DATA 'AM'                            4
WF_ITEM3             APPS_TS_TX_DATA 'AP'                            4
WF_ITEM47            APPS_TS_TX_DATA 'OB'                            4
WF_ITEM48            APPS_TS_TX_DATA 'OE'                            4
WF_ITEM49            APPS_TS_TX_DATA 'OF'                            4
WF_ITEM50            APPS_TS_TX_DATA 'OK'                            4
WF_ITEM75            APPS_TS_TX_DATA 'WI'                            4
WF_ITEM76            APPS_TS_TX_DATA 'WS'                            4
WF_ITEM77            APPS_TS_TX_DATA MAXVALUE                        8
77 rows selected.
============= From dba_part_key_columns : Partition Columns =============
NAME                           OBJEC Column Name                    COLUMN_POSITION
WF_ITEM_ATTRIBUTE_VALUES       TABLE ITEM_TYPE                                    1
1 row selected.
PPR1 sql> @q_tabsubpart wf_item_attribute_values WF_ITEM49
============= From DBA_Tab_SubPartitions : SubPartition Names / Tablespaces =============
Partition Name       SUBPARTITION_NAME              TS Name         High Value           High Val Len
WF_ITEM49            SYS_SUBP3326                   APPS_TS_TX_DATA                                 0
WF_ITEM49            SYS_SUBP3328                   APPS_TS_TX_DATA                                 0
WF_ITEM49            SYS_SUBP3332                   APPS_TS_TX_DATA                                 0
WF_ITEM49            SYS_SUBP3331                   APPS_TS_TX_DATA                                 0
WF_ITEM49            SYS_SUBP3330                   APPS_TS_TX_DATA                                 0
WF_ITEM49            SYS_SUBP3329                   APPS_TS_TX_DATA                                 0
WF_ITEM49            SYS_SUBP3327                   APPS_TS_TX_DATA                                 0
WF_ITEM49            SYS_SUBP3325                   APPS_TS_TX_DATA                                 0
8 rows selected.
============= From dba_part_key_columns : Partition Columns =============
NAME                           OBJEC Column Name                    COLUMN_POSITION
WF_ITEM_ATTRIBUTE_VALUES       TABLE ITEM_KEY                                     1
1 row selected.
from DBA_Segments - just for partition WF_ITEM49 :
Segment Name                        TSname       Partition Name       Segment Type     BLOCKS     Mbytes    EXTENTS Next Ext(Mb)
WF_ITEM_ATTRIBUTE_VALUES            @TX_DATA     SYS_SUBP3332         TblSubPart        16096     125.75       1006         .125
WF_ITEM_ATTRIBUTE_VALUES            @TX_DATA     SYS_SUBP3331         TblSubPart        16160     126.25       1010         .125
WF_ITEM_ATTRIBUTE_VALUES            @TX_DATA     SYS_SUBP3330         TblSubPart        16160     126.25       1010         .125
WF_ITEM_ATTRIBUTE_VALUES            @TX_DATA     SYS_SUBP3329         TblSubPart        16112    125.875       1007         .125
WF_ITEM_ATTRIBUTE_VALUES            @TX_DATA     SYS_SUBP3328         TblSubPart        16096     125.75       1006         .125
WF_ITEM_ATTRIBUTE_VALUES            @TX_DATA     SYS_SUBP3327         TblSubPart        16224     126.75       1014         .125
WF_ITEM_ATTRIBUTE_VALUES            @TX_DATA     SYS_SUBP3326         TblSubPart        16208    126.625       1013         .125
WF_ITEM_ATTRIBUTE_VALUES            @TX_DATA     SYS_SUBP3325         TblSubPart        16128        126       1008         .125
WF_ITEM_ATTRIBUTE_VALUES_PK         @TX_IDX      SYS_SUBP3332         IdxSubPart        59424     464.25       3714         .125
WF_ITEM_ATTRIBUTE_VALUES_PK         @TX_IDX      SYS_SUBP3331         IdxSubPart        59296     463.25       3706         .125
WF_ITEM_ATTRIBUTE_VALUES_PK         @TX_IDX      SYS_SUBP3330         IdxSubPart        59520        465       3720         .125
WF_ITEM_ATTRIBUTE_VALUES_PK         @TX_IDX      SYS_SUBP3329         IdxSubPart        59104     461.75       3694         .125
WF_ITEM_ATTRIBUTE_VALUES_PK         @TX_IDX      SYS_SUBP3328         IdxSubPart        59456      464.5       3716         .125
WF_ITEM_ATTRIBUTE_VALUES_PK         @TX_IDX      SYS_SUBP3327         IdxSubPart        60016    468.875       3751         .125
WF_ITEM_ATTRIBUTE_VALUES_PK         @TX_IDX      SYS_SUBP3326         IdxSubPart        59616     465.75       3726         .125
WF_ITEM_ATTRIBUTE_VALUES_PK         @TX_IDX      SYS_SUBP3325         IdxSubPart        59376    463.875       3711         .125
sum                                                                                               4726.5
[the @ in the TS Name is my shortcode, as Apps stupidly prefixes every ts with "APPS_TS_"]
The Tablespaces used for all subpartitions are UNIFORM extent mgmt, AUTO segment_space_management ; LOCAL extent mgmt.regards
Ivan

Invalid block count and poor performance

Hi - Can anyone help?
Running an early 2011 13' MBP on ML. For a year - 18 months I've noticed poor performance at times, consistently slow boot (sometimes 5 minutes to usable), occasional lockups and spotlight often reindexes itself and slows the system (much more than my previous MBP), I can't see anything that triggers it. I'm also getting recurring errors in Disk Utility of 'Invalid block count', every time I'll repair the disk (booting into recovery), but after a month of use the error will reappear. About three months ago I erased and reinstalled ML, some of my data was moved over in Time Machine but I didn't restore from it. The erase and reinstall hasn't made any difference and I'm still seeing the same issues. Hard disk SMART status appears to be fine.
Can anyone recommend any troubleshooting steps? I'm not sure what else to do, still under Applecare and was thinking maybe the HD isn't working correctly?
Cheers!

Performance.
Activity Monitor – Monitor Performance Problems
Performance Guide
Why is my computer slow
Why your Mac runs slower than it should
Slow boot.
Startup - Slow Boot
Startup - Slow Boot (2)
Startup - Slow Boot (3)
Startup Issues - Resolve
Startup Issues - Resolve (2)

Poor performance of WD Abap/ Adobe

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for