Poor quality downloaded photos

Hi all,
Can anyone explain me why photo's taken with my N96 look good as thumbnails in any viewer - I have tried several to see if the difference is caused by that ( Windows Picture Viewer, Visere, Irfanview etc) - but come out very lousy when enlarged? Colors especially are muddied and there are bands on them with the top looking normal, then blue and yellow and green horizontal areas running across them
Frustrating to not see them correctly and some are of very happy meetings that I want to share normally with beloveds.
Hope someone can help!!
I have added one example.
kr, marc
Attachments:
10122008059.jpg ‏894 KB

Dude, the total lack of color in the bottom part is definitely not due to loss of quality. It's some problem either with the matrix of the camera or a software problem. If video shooting is fine, then the problem is with the image processing of the OS. Backup everything and go directly to the repair shop (or try hard reset first)...
Message Edited by kamenlitchev on 06-Jan-2009 10:45 PM
Ericsson T10i -> Nokia 7110 -> Siemens C45, C55, M55, M65 -> Nokia 6131, N73, N82 -> HTC Wildfire, Desire HD -> Nokia Lumia 800 -> HTC Desire X -> Lumia 820 -> Sony Xperia SP -> Lumia 925 + Sennheiser CX 500
If I've helped, use the Kudos button to thank

Similar Messages

Very poor quality on photos made with iphone 4

Since a few weeks i've noticed that photos made with my iPhone 4 have a very poor quality. I've upgraded to IOS 4.3.2 thinking about a software problem, but the quality is still very poor. It´s like out of focus. I submit a just made photo. Any answer? Thanks a lot.
This photo is made with original photo app and no zoom.

Only thing I can think of is a focus problem (which could be software) or a lens with some junk on it that causes some blurring.
Can't offer a solution but can make some suggestions.
Take different types of pictures and, just for variety in case it reveals something, take two of each - one touching the screen and then one after touching for comparison.
Do close-ups and distance shots. Do indoor and outdoor, with and without flash on the indoor - again, of the same thing so you can compare.
Might reveal a pattern. If all are bad, then it probably goes back to the lense or software not working.
If some come out fine, it would seem to reduce the chance of it being the lens being dirty or something. On the other hand, if close up shots look good but distant ones don't, it could be either software or the internal focusing hardware isn't adjusting enough for distant shots.
Just some things to consider.

Poor quality "still" photo

I'm using Premiere Elements 12. When I'm choose "Tools", "Movie Menu", Then choose from a "Menu Theme", I am given the option of inserting a still photo. However, the quality of the photo in my final product is reproduced with VERY POOR resolution. Is there a solution to this problem? Does Premiere Elements 13 correct this problem?
Joe Nunes
Turlock,CA

britt142012
Thanks for the follow up.
Have we ruled out whether or not the issue exists with and without the antivirus and firewall(s) disabled?
Back to the now....
When did you get the Error 16 - after naming just the SLStore Folder to SLStoreOLD? Or did you do the renaming of both the SLCache as well as SLStore Folders to get the Error 16? You should be able to convert back to the original by deleting the newly created SLStore or SLCache Folders and removing OLD from the renamed ones. Is Error 16 gone then?
After that, try just the renaming of the SLStore Folder again.
Before we give up on renaming SLStore and SLCache Folders, check the permissions for each so that they are set for write/read for Everyone.
Then the classical generic ways....
1. Delete the Adobe Premiere Elements Prefs file and, if that does not work, delete the whole 12.0 Folder in which the Adobe Premiere Elements Prefs file exists.
Local Disk C
Users
Owner
AppData
Roaming
Adobe
Premiere Elements
12.0
and in the 12.0 Folder is the Adobe Premiere Elements Prefs file that you delete. If that does not work, then you delete the whole 12.0 Folder in which the Adobe Premiere Elements Prefs file exists. Be sure to be working with Folder Option Show Hidden Files, Folders, and Drives active so that you can see the complete path cited.
2. If that does not work....
a. uninstall the usual Control Panel way
b. do a free ccleaner run through (regular clearner and registry cleaner parts) to get rid of any leftovers from incomplete uninstalls reinstalls
CCleaner - PC Optimization and Cleaning - Free Download
c. reinstall with antivirus and firewall(s) disabled.
We will be watching for the new developments.
Thank you.
ATR

Poor quality of photo on cover of book

Hi all,
I've posted about this before, and I'm sort of dismayed that I'm the only one experiencing this. I've made photo books in Aperture for many years now, and I just did our big year-end book for 2014. As always, I'm very impressed by the quality of the printing in the pages of the book. But the photos on the front and back covers (and on the dust-jacket as well) are very flat and muddy. The problem isn't with the digital file of the photo -- the same photos appear on the pages inside the book, and they look good there. My monitor is color-calibrated.
Here's an interesting thing. When the books are printed in New Jersey (or at least the FedEx shipment originates in New Jersey), the covers have the muddiness problem. When the shipments originate in Oregon, the covers look good. Do you think there's a way to request the Oregon printer??

I wasn't able to find any "report a problem" link. Also, in one place on the Apple website it says specifically about print products that "We want you to be satisfied with your product, so send it back if you don't love it." Then in another spot it says "Print products are not returnable." And when I go to my order information, there are no buttons or hyperlinks to click to return it.
As I've mentioned, this has happened a number of times over the years. I may take the books to a nearby Apple Store to see about a return or refund -- and with the demise of Aperture, I may take this opportunity to (reluctantly) look once again into Blurb books and others that I've used sporadically over the years . . . Sigh.
I would GREATLY appreciate hearing if others have had experiences like this or if anyone has any advice for actually contacting a human being at Apple to discuss this. Thank you.

Poor Quality of Photo JPEG Quicktime Export PPro CS4

Adobe Premiere Pro CS4
2 Xeon Dual Core 3.2 Ghz
2 GB RAM
XP SP3
Nvidia 8600 GT
The program that I use for presentation (ProPresenter) prefers Quicktime files rendered in the Photo JPEG format. I render it from a HDV 1080i 60 time line to a 1280x720 file.
In CS3 this worked great. In CS4 when I render it out, the file looks terrible. I even bumped it to 100% quality (normally I do about 85% in CS3)
The video has bad posterization and looks like it has been rendered at a low bit rate, which I think may be what is happening. CS3 didn't let me set the bit rate, and neither does CS4, but 2 minute files took about 700 MB to 1 GB after being exported in CS3. The resulting files in CS4 are 150 MBs.
The bit rate option when Photo JPEG and many other Quicktime codecs is selected, is greyed out and cannot be set.
So what can I do? I NEED to be able to export to Photo JPEG at high quality. Why would Premiere not allow me to set a bit rate, but more over, use such a low one? At least in CS3 it chose a high bitrate for you.
Am I missing something? Are others having this problem with Quicktime exports?
Here is the output from CS3. Some banding in the bacground gradients, but that's to be expected with JPEG.
Here is the output from CS4. Banding is much worse, jaggedy posterization, obvious artifacts. All of this becomes even more apparent with motion.

I would like to follow up a little bit. After talking to my friend, the bitrate problem was addressed in the 4.1 patches and exporting to Photo JPEG at least was fixed, at least that's what he told me and from his description of the problem, I'm quite sure he knew exactly what I was talking about.
But still, after he listed his annoyances such as the much longer render times, and an interface and timeline playback that just never seems to be quite fast enough to keep up, I long for the simple interface of Premiere 6.5 with updated HD capabilities. Every step since then has made the interface more unnessarily resource intensive.
I don't think I'll be upgrading to CS4, sorry Adobe. Please stop making Premiere for super machines. I have a very good computer, and it's having trouble running Premiere CS4. It doesn't NEED to be this resource intensive. It doesn't have to bog down when it's run on anything but the best of the best computers.
In a simple A-B-C comparison, the speed of playing an HD clip with a couple effects goes down and down and down as you go from Pro 1.5 -> CS3 -> CS4. Why? What other areas are so improved that we need to have such a slowdown of the core?
Sorry, I'll stop venting now. I was just so hoping that I could recomend we upgrade to CS4 and solve some of our CS3 problems.

Poor quality / dark photo books?

Hi
I created a photo book for a Christmas present and ordered 2 copies for over £50.
I hadn't ordered one for years and that one was superb but these are awful. Pics were shot with an ESO 400D and they look great on (calibrated) iMac and Formac screens but the books all look really under exposed. Backgrounds for example, which contains plant life etc have more or less just come out black.
What should I do ? (I know it's a little late after ordering them but have been busy) - should I send them back to be reprinted ?
thanks
Roger

Roger:
What is the color profile of those photos? Are they the Adobe RGB?
You might be able to get some compensation from apple. Contact them via the following link and explain in detail the issue. Waiting this long may work against you however but it's worth a try: http://www.apple.com/support/photoservices/returns/
TIP: For insurance against the iPhoto database corruption that many users have experienced I recommend making a backup copy of the Library6.iPhoto database file and keep it current. If problems crop up where iPhoto suddenly can't see any photos or thinks there are no photos in the library, replacing the working Library6.iPhoto file with the backup will often get the library back. By keeping it current I mean backup after each import and/or any serious editing or work on books, slideshows, calendars, cards, etc. That insures that if a problem pops up and you do need to replace the database file, you'll retain all those efforts. It doesn't take long to make the backup and it's good insurance.
I've created an Automator workflow application (requires Tiger), iPhoto dB File Backup, that will copy the selected Library6.iPhoto file from your iPhoto Library folder to the Pictures folder, replacing any previous version of it. It's compatible with iPhoto 08 libraries and Leopard. iPhoto does not have to be closed to run the application, just idle. You can download it at Toad's Cellar. Be sure to read the Read Me pdf file.

Help! Poor quality uploading photos

My camera is a 10 megapixel and photos turn out beautiful on the camera's screen. Once I upload the pics into iphoto, they look just as terrific. The PROBLEM is when I try to upload to an independent site such as Snapfish, Photobucket, Shutterfly, etc. All of my pics come out like I'm using a 3 megapixel camera or worse! They lose all their clarity, sharpness and beauty. If anyone can help me out, I would really appreciate it. Thank you.

catslittlebirds
Welcome to the Apple Discussions.
How are you uploading? You're not rooting around in the iPhoto Library Folder, are you? Attaching files from the Data folder?
There are three ways (at least) to get files from the iPhoto Window.
1. *Drag and Drop*: Drag a photo from the iPhoto Window to the desktop, there iPhoto will make a full-sized copy of the pic.
2. *File -> Export*: Select the files in the iPhoto Window and go File -> Export. The dialogue will give you various options, including altering the format, naming the files and changing the size. Again, producing a copy.
3. *Show File*: Right- (or Control-) Click on a pic and in the resulting dialogue choose 'Show File'. A Finder window will pop open with the file already selected.
To upload to MySpace or any site that does not have an iPhoto Export Plug-in the recommended way is to Select the Pic in the iPhoto Window and go File -> Export and export the pic to the desktop, then upload from there. After the upload you can trash the pic on the desktop. It's only a copy and your original is safe in iPhoto.
This is also true for emailing with Web-based services. If you're using Gmail you can use THIS
If you use Apple's Mail, Entourage, AOL or Eudora you can email from within iPhoto.
If you use a Cocoa-based Browser such as Safari, you can drag the pics from the iPhoto Window to the Attach window in the browser. Or, if you want to access the files with iPhoto not running, then create a Media Browser using Automator (takes about 10 seconds) or use THIS
Also, for 10.5 users: If you use the extended Open or Attach dialogue (with Column View) you can scroll to the bottom of the Shortcuts and find the Media browser there. Select any pic you want from there.
Regards
TD

Why do iPhone 4s and 5 take poor quality concert photos?

I can't seem to find a straight answer or any tips for this problem. Hoping someone can hel.
I have an iPhone 4s and my husband has an iPhone 5. Every concert we've been to, we try to get some pictures and they are either all white, over exposed, or out of focus and you can't even tell what you've taken a picture of. Then, once in a while, it autofocuses for a quick second the lighting is correct and image is sharp. But then it goes out of focus again and the next picture turns white and blurry. And it's even worse when you try to zoom in. In fact the zoom takes blurry photos most of the time, whether at a concert or not. But the focus of this question is concert photos. At my most recent concert, I noticed that the person in front of me who had a non-iPhone (looked like a Samsung) was taking beautiful pictures, and she was zooming in and getting close-up shots. Compared to what she had, my iPhone camera was a piece of junk--and it should not be! Is there something we're not doing correctly? Is this just the iPhone has an inferior camera with regard to this kind of lighting? I'm hoping someone can shed some light and advice on this issue.

Thank you, Courcoul. I will check out the Fast Camera and Blux Pro. They could come in handy for other photo-taking activities. However, I'm not sure it's going to solve my white-out-overexposure-blurry problem. Shouldn't we expect Apple's camera to work properly, without any special apps to make it behave for standard type stuff? Especially for the price we pay to own an Apple. It's a drag when you see a Samsung taking good pictures and zooming in without losing focus. I like your advice for other specialized apps, though. Much appreciated. And I will check into them.
If anyone can shed some light (no pun intended) on the over exposure white and out of focus issue with concert photos, I'd love to hear more suggestions. Thanks!!

Poor quality downloaded music

I recently downloaded Get Cape. Wear Cape. Fly's new album and the last few tracks of the album sounded very bad and jumped a lot. It was as if it was a scratched CD and it jumped, skipped and in some cases missed whole chunks of the song! I tried to download the same bad songs again (paying further money) and the newly downloaded songs sounded the same. This happens when I play the songs on my iPod so it is not my macbook speakers. Does anyone else have this? Or how can I get my money back? Or get the songs in good condition? Please help anyone with any knowledge!

Hi,
I've just purchased the same album and the exact same thing is happening to me.
I tried afterwards to listen to the preview on Itunes Store, and actually you can the clicking sound in the song "Better Things"
But I'll try contact apple through the link in the receipt..
Good Luck
//Dressle

Poor quality image with doing videos with photos/images HELP!

Hello,
I bought Adobe Premiere Element to make videos with pictures. When I do the video, the quality of my photos is good. When I save the video on my computer or I download it on youtube (example) the quality of my photos is extremely poor. Why? Does anyone can help me? Thank you!

What Project Preset did you choose at New Project? In the case of Video, composed of Still Images ONLY, you would set that to your desired delivery specs. Not so, if you are also using Video. I tried several types of parameters. Some parameters give poor quality when I upload it to Youtube (for example) and others in the design of video and upload to YouTube. So which settings should I use for photos only ?
This sounds like you are talking about the Export/Share settings for output to YouTube.
What I was asking is what did you start off with, when you were at New Project?
If you are doing an SD Project, you will have either 720 x 480 (NTSC), or 720 x 576 (PAL) pixels in the Project's Frame Size. If that is what you want, then I would Scale your camera original Stills to 640 x 480 (for NTSC), as you have Square Pixels, and the Project will have either 0.9 for NTSC Standard, or 1.21 for NTSC Widescreen).
PrE can Scale the Still Images, but the Scaling algorithms in Photoshop are much better, and offer more control.
Now, if you wish to do an HD Project, just choose that as your Preset, and then use the Images in about their original size. Note, there will be some black borders, as the screen-caps most likely have a different Aspect Ratio, than a Video Project, which for HD will be 16:9. Especially with screen-caps, that are pretty low resolution to begin with, I would NOT do any Scaling, and would live with the letterboxing, or pillar boxing, rather than Scale and effectively Crop.
Also, when Scaling in Photoshop, I do not Save_As JPEG, as it introduces compression, but only as either PSD (Photoshop's native format), or PNG.
Good luck,
Hunt

Photos poor quality

I managed to download my old photo collections in the library, but it seems all the photos are of poor quality. The resolution is bad. Is there any way I can fix this problem? Thanks.

Photos downloaded to the iPhone are optimized for the iPhone and do not maintain their original resolution.

How do I delete unwanted photos (duplicates, poor quality How do I delete unwanted photos (duplicates, poor quality or old ones thator oones that I just don't want) from my IPhoto Library.I followed the instruction from Help and neither suggestion worked.

How do I delete unwanted photos (duplicates, poor quality or old ones that I just don't want) from my IPhoto Library.I followed the instruction from Help and neither suggestion worked.
Tried to select and press delete key...didn't work
Tried to select, press arrow on lower right and move to trash.. didn't work

select a photo in an event and either drag it to the iPhoto trash or press the delete key - then empty theiPhoto trash an dthe system trash and the photo is totally gone from the system
LN

Poor quality photo printing

I am getting very poor quality prints from my new Canon MG6220. I have it set on the advanced photo with glossy paper. Am I missing something?

Are you using Canon brand paper? Unless you have the proper profile for other papers you'll get less than ideal prints. The printer (when working correctly) will spray the correct amount of ink onto the paper, but it's matched to Canon paper. IF you use any other brand it may absorb more ink or less than the printer is set to spray. That has a major effect on the look of the photo.
Also note that most people edit using their monitor set at full brightness, but when they print it's not the same. It's very important to set your monitor's brightness to match what your printer produces.
"A skill is developed through constant practice with a passion to improve, not bought."

Poor quality TV programme downloads in the UK?

Hi,
I purchased a few episodes of spooks from the iTunes UK Store. I have to say it was a massive disappointment, the resolution looks way below normal PAL standards. It is also a disappointment that many of the programmes for sale that are aired on BBC HD are only available in SD and as before, at much lower quality than available watching on air.
Is this others experience too? I Would love to know what the actual resolution and compression is on these downloads.

The quality of encoding of iTunes Store material varies greatly.
The problem I feel is the diversity of the potential target playback device - things need to work on basic video ipods through iPod Touch/iPhone, computer and AppleTV with widely varying playback specs.
Ideally there would be several quality downloads available tailored to the output device of main use, with price inversely prorortional to quality/file size. perhaps there could be a nominal upgrade/downgarde fee for the other resolutions/quality or an option to buy a package.
The rentals are by and large quite good quality, but for purchases, to justify buying into a proprietary DRM video format for things you want to play for years to come, the quality:price ratio has to be good enough to make it a no-brainer to get the download rather than the DVD +/- converting the physical media.
There is also the fact that what we buy a DRM product which may become obsolete in a few years, and would have to buy products all over again. It may not be a problem, but there are no guarantees that these DRM files will be playable in years to come once the hardware it was designed for has been replaced.
Not sure about the US but as more TV Shows etc become available to buy, a large proprotion of comments at the UK store are complaints about pricing - the equivalent DVDs are often much cheaper; how many people are prepared to pay just for convenience especially if the quality might be poor?
Take as an example the first season of Bewitched - I'd love to have this for nostalgia as I quite enjoyed it as a child, but it costs nearly £43 and the equivalent DVD is £12 from Amazon.
I honestly could not imagine paying £43 for a TV Show season unless you were a pretty serious fan of that show, and in that case I bet you'd already have it on DVD.
The UK pricing structure seems to regard each show as though people 'must have' these shows with pricing to match - the main target audience to get decent sales should be broader, i.e. those who'd not be at all bothered if they didn't have the show to watch, but would probably buy three or four of such shows for the equivalent pricing of one currently.
I could buy the Bewitched DVD for £12 from Amazon, but I haven't watched a DVD for many months since having AppleTV. I could not be bothered converting a DVD of something like this to watch on AppleTV, but that will not make me spend silly money for the convenience of the download.
Yet again, pricing makes people who are prepared to pay for legal downloads feel it's not good value. The habitual illegal filesharers won't give a monkey's, nor will they be affected.
AC
Message was edited by: Alley_Cat

Poor quality Photo printing with the HP Officejet 6600

Is anyone having a problem with the HP Officejet 6600 having very poor quality photo prints?

Hi HereInJersey,
Welcome to the HP Support forums. I understand that printed photos from your Officejet 6600 don't have the quality that you expect.
I have included the "Fixing Ink Streaks, Faded Prints, and Other Common Print Quality Problems" troubleshooting document. It has detailed steps to take to improve the quality of your print jobs.
Regards,
Happytohelp01
Please click on the Thumbs Up on the right to say “Thanks” for helping!
Please click “Accept as Solution ” on the post that solves your issue to help others find the solution.
I work on behalf of HP

Poor quality downloaded photos

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for