Poor Quality of Photo JPEG Quicktime Export PPro CS4

Adobe Premiere Pro CS4
2 Xeon Dual Core 3.2 Ghz
2 GB RAM
XP SP3
Nvidia 8600 GT
The program that I use for presentation (ProPresenter) prefers Quicktime files rendered in the Photo JPEG format. I render it from a HDV 1080i 60 time line to a 1280x720 file.
In CS3 this worked great. In CS4 when I render it out, the file looks terrible. I even bumped it to 100% quality (normally I do about 85% in CS3)
The video has bad posterization and looks like it has been rendered at a low bit rate, which I think may be what is happening. CS3 didn't let me set the bit rate, and neither does CS4, but 2 minute files took about 700 MB to 1 GB after being exported in CS3. The resulting files in CS4 are 150 MBs.
The bit rate option when Photo JPEG and many other Quicktime codecs is selected, is greyed out and cannot be set.
So what can I do? I NEED to be able to export to Photo JPEG at high quality. Why would Premiere not allow me to set a bit rate, but more over, use such a low one? At least in CS3 it chose a high bitrate for you.
Am I missing something? Are others having this problem with Quicktime exports?
Here is the output from CS3. Some banding in the bacground gradients, but that's to be expected with JPEG.
Here is the output from CS4. Banding is much worse, jaggedy posterization, obvious artifacts. All of this becomes even more apparent with motion.

I would like to follow up a little bit. After talking to my friend, the bitrate problem was addressed in the 4.1 patches and exporting to Photo JPEG at least was fixed, at least that's what he told me and from his description of the problem, I'm quite sure he knew exactly what I was talking about.
But still, after he listed his annoyances such as the much longer render times, and an interface and timeline playback that just never seems to be quite fast enough to keep up, I long for the simple interface of Premiere 6.5 with updated HD capabilities. Every step since then has made the interface more unnessarily resource intensive.
I don't think I'll be upgrading to CS4, sorry Adobe. Please stop making Premiere for super machines. I have a very good computer, and it's having trouble running Premiere CS4. It doesn't NEED to be this resource intensive. It doesn't have to bog down when it's run on anything but the best of the best computers.
In a simple A-B-C comparison, the speed of playing an HD clip with a couple effects goes down and down and down as you go from Pro 1.5 -> CS3 -> CS4. Why? What other areas are so improved that we need to have such a slowdown of the core?
Sorry, I'll stop venting now. I was just so hoping that I could recomend we upgrade to CS4 and solve some of our CS3 problems.

Similar Messages

Very poor quality on photos made with iphone 4

Since a few weeks i've noticed that photos made with my iPhone 4 have a very poor quality. I've upgraded to IOS 4.3.2 thinking about a software problem, but the quality is still very poor. It´s like out of focus. I submit a just made photo. Any answer? Thanks a lot.
This photo is made with original photo app and no zoom.

Only thing I can think of is a focus problem (which could be software) or a lens with some junk on it that causes some blurring.
Can't offer a solution but can make some suggestions.
Take different types of pictures and, just for variety in case it reveals something, take two of each - one touching the screen and then one after touching for comparison.
Do close-ups and distance shots. Do indoor and outdoor, with and without flash on the indoor - again, of the same thing so you can compare.
Might reveal a pattern. If all are bad, then it probably goes back to the lense or software not working.
If some come out fine, it would seem to reduce the chance of it being the lens being dirty or something. On the other hand, if close up shots look good but distant ones don't, it could be either software or the internal focusing hardware isn't adjusting enough for distant shots.
Just some things to consider.

Poor Quality in Wide-Screen When Exporting HD to Quicktime

Hello all...
I'm working on a fairly large project in iMovie HD with wide-screen footage from my Sony HDR-HC3 and have hit a wall.
I can't seem to get a good result when I export clips into Quicktime in a wide-screen format. They are a bit choppy & you can see bits of some horizontal lines. The same video exported in full-screen VGA looks great. Any tips...? I basically just want to make good quality QT movies watchable on my computer that maintain the original aspect ratio (and LOOK like they do in iMovie!)
The entire project is around 100GB and I currently have almost 40GB of free space. Any help appreciated!
Dual 2.3 G5 with 4.5GB Ram Mac OS X (10.4.6)

What do you need to end up with? Just a file to play back or burn to a DVD or make a web stream or?
Jerry

Poor quality "still" photo

I'm using Premiere Elements 12. When I'm choose "Tools", "Movie Menu", Then choose from a "Menu Theme", I am given the option of inserting a still photo. However, the quality of the photo in my final product is reproduced with VERY POOR resolution. Is there a solution to this problem? Does Premiere Elements 13 correct this problem?
Joe Nunes
Turlock,CA

britt142012
Thanks for the follow up.
Have we ruled out whether or not the issue exists with and without the antivirus and firewall(s) disabled?
Back to the now....
When did you get the Error 16 - after naming just the SLStore Folder to SLStoreOLD? Or did you do the renaming of both the SLCache as well as SLStore Folders to get the Error 16? You should be able to convert back to the original by deleting the newly created SLStore or SLCache Folders and removing OLD from the renamed ones. Is Error 16 gone then?
After that, try just the renaming of the SLStore Folder again.
Before we give up on renaming SLStore and SLCache Folders, check the permissions for each so that they are set for write/read for Everyone.
Then the classical generic ways....
1. Delete the Adobe Premiere Elements Prefs file and, if that does not work, delete the whole 12.0 Folder in which the Adobe Premiere Elements Prefs file exists.
Local Disk C
Users
Owner
AppData
Roaming
Adobe
Premiere Elements
12.0
and in the 12.0 Folder is the Adobe Premiere Elements Prefs file that you delete. If that does not work, then you delete the whole 12.0 Folder in which the Adobe Premiere Elements Prefs file exists. Be sure to be working with Folder Option Show Hidden Files, Folders, and Drives active so that you can see the complete path cited.
2. If that does not work....
a. uninstall the usual Control Panel way
b. do a free ccleaner run through (regular clearner and registry cleaner parts) to get rid of any leftovers from incomplete uninstalls reinstalls
CCleaner - PC Optimization and Cleaning - Free Download
c. reinstall with antivirus and firewall(s) disabled.
We will be watching for the new developments.
Thank you.
ATR

Help! Poor quality uploading photos

My camera is a 10 megapixel and photos turn out beautiful on the camera's screen. Once I upload the pics into iphoto, they look just as terrific. The PROBLEM is when I try to upload to an independent site such as Snapfish, Photobucket, Shutterfly, etc. All of my pics come out like I'm using a 3 megapixel camera or worse! They lose all their clarity, sharpness and beauty. If anyone can help me out, I would really appreciate it. Thank you.

catslittlebirds
Welcome to the Apple Discussions.
How are you uploading? You're not rooting around in the iPhoto Library Folder, are you? Attaching files from the Data folder?
There are three ways (at least) to get files from the iPhoto Window.
1. *Drag and Drop*: Drag a photo from the iPhoto Window to the desktop, there iPhoto will make a full-sized copy of the pic.
2. *File -> Export*: Select the files in the iPhoto Window and go File -> Export. The dialogue will give you various options, including altering the format, naming the files and changing the size. Again, producing a copy.
3. *Show File*: Right- (or Control-) Click on a pic and in the resulting dialogue choose 'Show File'. A Finder window will pop open with the file already selected.
To upload to MySpace or any site that does not have an iPhoto Export Plug-in the recommended way is to Select the Pic in the iPhoto Window and go File -> Export and export the pic to the desktop, then upload from there. After the upload you can trash the pic on the desktop. It's only a copy and your original is safe in iPhoto.
This is also true for emailing with Web-based services. If you're using Gmail you can use THIS
If you use Apple's Mail, Entourage, AOL or Eudora you can email from within iPhoto.
If you use a Cocoa-based Browser such as Safari, you can drag the pics from the iPhoto Window to the Attach window in the browser. Or, if you want to access the files with iPhoto not running, then create a Media Browser using Automator (takes about 10 seconds) or use THIS
Also, for 10.5 users: If you use the extended Open or Attach dialogue (with Column View) you can scroll to the bottom of the Shortcuts and find the Media browser there. Select any pic you want from there.
Regards
TD

Poor quality downloaded photos

Hi all,
Can anyone explain me why photo's taken with my N96 look good as thumbnails in any viewer - I have tried several to see if the difference is caused by that ( Windows Picture Viewer, Visere, Irfanview etc) - but come out very lousy when enlarged? Colors especially are muddied and there are bands on them with the top looking normal, then blue and yellow and green horizontal areas running across them
Frustrating to not see them correctly and some are of very happy meetings that I want to share normally with beloveds.
Hope someone can help!!
I have added one example.
kr, marc
Attachments:
10122008059.jpg ‏894 KB

Dude, the total lack of color in the bottom part is definitely not due to loss of quality. It's some problem either with the matrix of the camera or a software problem. If video shooting is fine, then the problem is with the image processing of the OS. Backup everything and go directly to the repair shop (or try hard reset first)...
Message Edited by kamenlitchev on 06-Jan-2009 10:45 PM
Ericsson T10i -> Nokia 7110 -> Siemens C45, C55, M55, M65 -> Nokia 6131, N73, N82 -> HTC Wildfire, Desire HD -> Nokia Lumia 800 -> HTC Desire X -> Lumia 820 -> Sony Xperia SP -> Lumia 925 + Sennheiser CX 500
If I've helped, use the Kudos button to thank

Poor quality conversion/downsizing with Aperture Export

I have noticed a difference in quality of exported JPG files, depending on if I downsize them manually, ahead of time, using an external editor (PSE) or if I let Aperture downsize them during export. The images downsized in PSE are noticeably sharper than the ones downsized by Aperture. Originals are high res JPG files from my D90 that I have converted to TIFF and touched up using PSE as an external editor. I would like to keep the full size, adjusted TIFF file as a master and just export to whatever size JPG is needed at the time. With the low quality Aperture exports (compared to downsizing first in PSE), I am having to individually downsize each TIFF in PSE prior to exporting as a JPG in “original size” mode (vs. letting Aperture handle the downsizing). Has anyone else noticed this degradation when exporting/downsizing in Aperture2? Is there any work around? Any comments would be appreciated! Thanks! (All export was done in JPG quality 10, with no pre-sharpening performed.)

Firstly, using window>show movie info, find out what the current bit rate is of the original movie.
When you come to export, keep the bit rate as close as possible to the original bit rate, keep the resolution the same as well as the frame rate. You should hopefully get much better quality.

Poor quality of photo on cover of book

Hi all,
I've posted about this before, and I'm sort of dismayed that I'm the only one experiencing this. I've made photo books in Aperture for many years now, and I just did our big year-end book for 2014. As always, I'm very impressed by the quality of the printing in the pages of the book. But the photos on the front and back covers (and on the dust-jacket as well) are very flat and muddy. The problem isn't with the digital file of the photo -- the same photos appear on the pages inside the book, and they look good there. My monitor is color-calibrated.
Here's an interesting thing. When the books are printed in New Jersey (or at least the FedEx shipment originates in New Jersey), the covers have the muddiness problem. When the shipments originate in Oregon, the covers look good. Do you think there's a way to request the Oregon printer??

I wasn't able to find any "report a problem" link. Also, in one place on the Apple website it says specifically about print products that "We want you to be satisfied with your product, so send it back if you don't love it." Then in another spot it says "Print products are not returnable." And when I go to my order information, there are no buttons or hyperlinks to click to return it.
As I've mentioned, this has happened a number of times over the years. I may take the books to a nearby Apple Store to see about a return or refund -- and with the demise of Aperture, I may take this opportunity to (reluctantly) look once again into Blurb books and others that I've used sporadically over the years . . . Sigh.
I would GREATLY appreciate hearing if others have had experiences like this or if anyone has any advice for actually contacting a human being at Apple to discuss this. Thank you.

Why do iPhone 4s and 5 take poor quality concert photos?

I can't seem to find a straight answer or any tips for this problem. Hoping someone can hel.
I have an iPhone 4s and my husband has an iPhone 5. Every concert we've been to, we try to get some pictures and they are either all white, over exposed, or out of focus and you can't even tell what you've taken a picture of. Then, once in a while, it autofocuses for a quick second the lighting is correct and image is sharp. But then it goes out of focus again and the next picture turns white and blurry. And it's even worse when you try to zoom in. In fact the zoom takes blurry photos most of the time, whether at a concert or not. But the focus of this question is concert photos. At my most recent concert, I noticed that the person in front of me who had a non-iPhone (looked like a Samsung) was taking beautiful pictures, and she was zooming in and getting close-up shots. Compared to what she had, my iPhone camera was a piece of junk--and it should not be! Is there something we're not doing correctly? Is this just the iPhone has an inferior camera with regard to this kind of lighting? I'm hoping someone can shed some light and advice on this issue.

Thank you, Courcoul. I will check out the Fast Camera and Blux Pro. They could come in handy for other photo-taking activities. However, I'm not sure it's going to solve my white-out-overexposure-blurry problem. Shouldn't we expect Apple's camera to work properly, without any special apps to make it behave for standard type stuff? Especially for the price we pay to own an Apple. It's a drag when you see a Samsung taking good pictures and zooming in without losing focus. I like your advice for other specialized apps, though. Much appreciated. And I will check into them.
If anyone can shed some light (no pun intended) on the over exposure white and out of focus issue with concert photos, I'd love to hear more suggestions. Thanks!!

Poor quality on multiple level video export. What am I doing wrong?

I'm having a problem with exporting a video I've been working on with FCPX.
The output file looks like it's being screened on a venetian blind with very small slats - ie the image appears to be made up a lots of narrow horizontal panels. I also get a kind of striated effect around all the edges (which I managed to eliminate in my latest attempt - see below)
The video looks fine in FCPX - it's only when I export Media that I'm seeing this problem.
The sections that I'm having this issue with consist of a background texture generator in the Timeline, and two layers of video clips above that. The video clips are resized and positioned top left and bottom right of the screen (overlapping in the centre), so that you can see two separate video clips playing over a background. At different points one or other of the clips expands to fill the whole screen.
The clips are variously original clips, compound clips, and a compound clip with slo-mo video in it.
(The reason for doing this is that it's 2 cameras following 2 separate, but simultaneous, processions. Sometimes I cut between them, but I also want to see both processions at the same time during the piece).
I've tried exporting using standard settings, Apple ProRes 244, and h.264, and I've gotten the best result so far by exporting to Compressor and using MPEG2 for DVD settings, with De-interleave turned on and giving it two passes. That got rid of the striations, but i still get the panel effect.
If I export a different section of the video, that only uses 2 layers of video (without the background generator, and with one layer of video in the Timeline), then the resulting export looks ok even with a standard settings Export Media, so I'm assuming that it's something to do with the attempt to give the images a background. This also may not be the best way to go about this, so I'm open to suggestions about _how I should do it!
If more info about how I've set up opacity etc is needed, let me know.
thanks for any help
David
Editing on a Mac Mini with 8mb ram (FCPX runs faster than on my MBPro!); FCPX1.1

I'll just add that I reimported my footage, using the Optimise media settings, and exported a short clip using Export media (ProRes 244) & Compressor (ProRess244 + DeInterleave filter). Neither showed the "venetian blinds" effect, but the first export had loads of fringing, and the second had a lot less, but there was still some visible.
Anyone? Is this a bug or some kind of operator error?
thanks
David

Poor quality / dark photo books?

Hi
I created a photo book for a Christmas present and ordered 2 copies for over £50.
I hadn't ordered one for years and that one was superb but these are awful. Pics were shot with an ESO 400D and they look great on (calibrated) iMac and Formac screens but the books all look really under exposed. Backgrounds for example, which contains plant life etc have more or less just come out black.
What should I do ? (I know it's a little late after ordering them but have been busy) - should I send them back to be reprinted ?
thanks
Roger

Roger:
What is the color profile of those photos? Are they the Adobe RGB?
You might be able to get some compensation from apple. Contact them via the following link and explain in detail the issue. Waiting this long may work against you however but it's worth a try: http://www.apple.com/support/photoservices/returns/
TIP: For insurance against the iPhoto database corruption that many users have experienced I recommend making a backup copy of the Library6.iPhoto database file and keep it current. If problems crop up where iPhoto suddenly can't see any photos or thinks there are no photos in the library, replacing the working Library6.iPhoto file with the backup will often get the library back. By keeping it current I mean backup after each import and/or any serious editing or work on books, slideshows, calendars, cards, etc. That insures that if a problem pops up and you do need to replace the database file, you'll retain all those efforts. It doesn't take long to make the backup and it's good insurance.
I've created an Automator workflow application (requires Tiger), iPhoto dB File Backup, that will copy the selected Library6.iPhoto file from your iPhoto Library folder to the Pictures folder, replacing any previous version of it. It's compatible with iPhoto 08 libraries and Leopard. iPhoto does not have to be closed to run the application, just idle. You can download it at Toad's Cellar. Be sure to read the Read Me pdf file.

Poor quality save for web exports

It doesn't matter whether i'm exporting from Ai or Ps or whether it's CS6 or CC. I have changed the raster settings in Ai and i've also tried all optimization options with all different export file types (jpg, png, gif) at all different quality settings. It doesn't matter if I start with an ai, eps, pdf, png... the export result is always poor quality.
I have tried exporting at 300ppi and that does fix the quality issue and bloats the file size, but this way (the export route) is so time consuming since you have to resize your artwork each time as well as the artboard so that it doesn't cut off pixels. Save for web never used to have these quality issues and it also never used to cut off pixels around the edges. These workarounds prove very time consuming and produce file sizes that are not ideal.
When i first noticed this issue I was using Mavericks with CS6 and since am using Yosemite and Creative Cloud.
Steps to reproduce:
1. Create any bitmap or vector graphic in Ai or Ps, It doesn't matter whether you convert text to outlines or not
2. Save for web
3. View image in any application or browser to see poor quality and pixel trimming. Others running the same version and system are not having this issue, but I have checked many forums and found many others that do have this same issue but can't seem to find a solution.
Results:stair stepping, degradation, pixel trimming, general poor image quality
Expected results: Previously the save for web feature allowed for a decent quality image

Not an Illustrator expert at all, but did you align your art work with the pixel grid? If you didn't, there can be results as you describe them. As I said, I am not an expert, but online searching for the subject may help.

Photo-JPEG / Compressor 4

How do I create 8-bit, Photo-JPEG QuickTime movie clips in Compressor 4? Does not seem to be among the built-in codec options.

Make a custom setting. Choose Quick Time Movie for Format. In Video, change the QT Settings which opens up the QT dialogue. In the Compressor drop-down, choose Photo JPEG.
Russ

Why would I want to change JPEG quality of photos when exporting them from iPhoto?

Why would I want to change JPEG quality of photos when exporting them from iPhoto? Changing the quality of the print changes the size of the saved file and thus impacts the speed at which it is moved on the internet. But other than size of the file, what is the advantage of changing the quality?

I have no idea why you would want to do anything
Some people want lower quality to reduce file size for different reasons
It is an option - if you do pot want to do that do not use that option
LN

QuickTime exports: poor quality result

This ties in with troubles I've been having with EyeTV exporting in bad quality. Since it uses the QuickTime exporter, I've narrowed my problem to QuickTime giving very bad quality exports. I know it is definitely QuickTime and not my settings, since I use the exact same settings in VisualHub and it converts the file beautifully.
This is become more of an issue because I was wanting to export has H.264 directly from Final Cut Pro, but since it too uses the QuickTime export it provides me with very poor clarity.
My system details:
Mac OS X 10.5.4, QuickTime 7.5.
I have Flip4Mac and Perian codecs installed for QuickTime. What is the issue here?

It's just a normal computer monitor. But the thing is if I a-b the exported video compared to the video before it was ever dropped into final cut pro, there is an obvious difference. So, I didn't think the monitor was an issue although I am sure it doesn't help. But, in the end the videos I do end up getting converted to flash and put on the website. Perhaps I should deinterlace?
G5 Mac OS X (10.4.9) Panasonic PV-GS300 3CCD

Poor Quality of Photo JPEG Quicktime Export PPro CS4

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for