Poor quality when visio obejcts are embeded into word

hi,
when i embed a visio object into a word doc and then link this word doc to a robohelp most of the graphics done in visio look terrible in the html or flash help (very low resolution) and i can't find out how to fox this (if i do exactly the same in component one doc-to-help it all looks just perfect)
is there a way to somehow change settings how vector objects which are embedded in word are beeing converted?
-> please note that neither converting my visio objects into images manuelly is NOT a solution since it kills the dynamic of the document, nor can i add graphic files to my robohelp project manually - all editing must be done solely in word in our case

Hi there
To my knowledge, DocToHelp is Word based, no? I see you posted this to the RoboHelp HTML forum. (I can't believe I'm even suggesting this, but here goes.) Have you tried using RoboHelp for Word? If not, perhaps it's worth trying.
On the up side, it may convert just as you would hope and things will work dandy. On the down side, there isn't all that much of a user base for RoboHelp for Word. I'm not sure if any training exists for it as well.
Cheers... Rick
Helpful and Handy Links
RoboHelp Wish Form/Bug Reporting Form
Begin learning RoboHelp HTML 7 or 8 within the day - $24.95!
Adobe Certified RoboHelp HTML Training
SorcerStone Blog
RoboHelp eBooks

Similar Messages

  • Poor Image quality of photos that are loaded into imovie 09 for slideshows

    I've been scouring through the topics on the subject and cannot seem to find a definitive answer. I use imovie primarily to make photo slideshows mainly for my wedding photography. imovie HD (the 06 version) was/is fantastic. imovie 09 however seems to have a problem coping with the images that are imported. The issue lies with colours, particulary where a smooth colour gradient occurs, also too it seems to struggle with blacks on occassion. It is as if imovie 09 doesn't have enough colours and this 'gradation' is clearly evident on a number of pictures used. All my images a hi res jpeg, some converted from RAW.
    In iphoto, photoshop, finder, bridge etc they are 100% fine but the moment they are either dragged from a folder into IM09, or imported via the menu the issue occurs. I have burn't a DVD with these slideshows and the DVD shows the same problem. There must be a problem when the image is brought into IM09 initially, perhaps the downsizing process is too much resulting in a super compressed image, hence this messy colour gradation.
    I've even exported to a quicktime movie and they are 100% clean images, but I, prefer the ease of adding music and other features in imovie.
    Something is not right and it's a pain. imovie HD 06 is so much better at handling this, I'm not sure what apple have done here. This problem was presented a week after I had my mac book pro 13" at the Australian PMA back in July. Apple guys acknowledged the problem and even used my 'clean images' on several of their macs to confirm a software issue, they said they would pass it up the line but nothing in terms of software updaes have fixed the issue. I'm sure others have encountered the problem. Any suggestions? Help appreciated.

    Yup, you are not the only one, its sooo easy to demonstrate. Take any nice photo with some dark gradients, resize to HD resolution, import and export as HD.

  • Very poor quality when exporting slideshow

    I am using a Canon 5D, and when I view the images in Full screen. They are gorgeous. I created a slideshow. When I play the slideshow in Aperture - again they are gorgeous and crisp, however when I export these images to a Quicktime movie they look blurry - almost like they were taken with a regular point and shoot.
    I have selected Export > HD 720p
    I understand that slideshows are generated from previews, so I went to Aperture > Preferences > Previews and selected Photo Preview > Don't limit & for Photo Preview Quality I selected 12 (high).
    I kept the 2 selections that were there on default selected (these are: new projects automatically generate previews, and use embedded JPEG from camera whenever possible)
    Then I selected all of the images in the slideshow, and when I right clicked and selected "Update Previews" I received the message saying that the previews were already up to date. I exported the slideshow - and the quality was still poor.
    I then tried to update the previews from the items in the individual libraries themselves instead of selecting the images in the Slideshow (hoping that would make a difference), and tried to update the previews. But I got the same error.
    What am I missing? Why am I seeing excellent quality when I preview the slideshow when I click the Full Screen play button - but when I export it to 720p HD it looks horrendous.
    Please help!

    FTF you need to hold down the alt key when selecting the images and choose generate preview. The update preview option maintains previous settings. Using alt/option creates a new preview.
    Second HD720p is still significantly below the resolution of your display so the images will look softer.
    But try the previews first and post back.
    M.

  • Master file is poor quality when played in QT

    I have a 45 minute documentary that was ingested as native into FCPX from a Sony XDCAM, compressed in compressor using mpeg-2 for DVDSP.
    All this worked fine.
    My question is about the master file. It is 422 (same as source)and Linear PCM. Playback in QT is pretty poor quality.
    I optimized (as I was working in proxy) before creating the master file.
    My question is, is this normal or did I choose the wrong settings? 
    Thanks
    Sandy

    What are the complete specs of the original media besides XDCAM?
    compressed in compressor using mpeg-2 for DVDSP.
    It is 422 (same as source)and Linear PCM.
    I don't believe this is correct. If it's compressed for DVDSP it's going to the DVD standard and is no longer 422. The audio is separate and is normally compressed to an AC3 Dolby Digital file.
    I optimized (as I was working in proxy)
    Did you switch back to original/optimized before you exported, or did you export the proxy version?

  • Poor quality when rendering CC Particle Systems II

    Hi Guys.
    I'm getting strange render results when I render out CC Particle Systems II cubes and tetrahedrons.
    I have the particles cascading out towards the viewer and they look great when I preview render in AFX but when I do a full render to H.264 mp4 they start really crisp and clear then turn in to a really pixelated mess as the render continues. It's odd. I tried rendering through Adobe media encoder but it's the same. I also tried just rendering the particle part of the comp and it does the same thing. Am I missing some settings?
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks

    Without seeing it in motion, it sounds like normal issues you would experience with an interframe compression scheme like H.264
    H.264 works on the principle of a few full frames scattered among a bunch of incomplete frames with interpolated data. Your first frame would be a keyframe with full data and that middle frame would be one that's incomplete. The reason it looks worse when the particles are on the screen is that there's also a lot more data happening. In the rest of your project, the compression is barely noticeable. This is an issue any time you are trying to design for broadcast or the web. Heck, you can even see this kind of artifacting in major releases. See, for example, the Planet Earth Blu-ray in any of the shots involving a massive flock of birds. You can see compression artifacts despite the pristine quality you would expect from them. There's only so much data you can squeeze out of a frame (to make it easily playable) before certain artifacts will creep in.
    You can either redesign to make it less likely to have artifacts when compressed or you can rest assured that most normal people won't even notice something like this as it flies past them on the screen.
    Now, this is all assuming your particles are moving quickly. If it looks like that with slow, smooth motion, something else may be wrong.

  • Poor Quality When Imported From FCP

    Hello I have been having issues when importing a QT files into After Effects. When exported from FCP and imported into After Effects the footage loses significant quality, maybe a little interlaced. Ive checked and double checked fields, Im exporting in animation. Ive done both QT movie and QT conversion with the same result. Also it happens with files exported from FCP from other computers. Ive checked export settings & coposition settings. Any Ideas?
    Thanks

    bogiesan wrote:
    -DWS- wrote:
    Thanks. That is what makes the most sense to me. How do I elect how After Effects interprets the footage? I went to preferences but couldn't find anything that fixed the problem there.
    See the help system for Interpret Footage.
    It's a right-click dropdown form the project pane. Select a footage item, Interpret Footage.
    Thank you Lower Fields first was selected

  • Internal mic poor quality when recording in iMovie

    I noticed exceptionally poor quality of internal mic when recording acoustic guitar piece on iMovie, with the built in iSight camera. Technically, the sound is called "Phasing" - it sounds like a slow 'whoosh' over all of the audio.
    After investigation, I have found the cause to be the Ambient Noise Reduction algorithm added by Apple.
    To remove this - go to:
    System Preferences
    Sound
    Input
    *uncheck* 'use ambient noise reduction'
    Problem solved....
    Now my question - does anyone know how to use the iSight (built in) and simultaneously and synchronously record audio using an External Mic - eg the Blue "Snowball" - which is a USB mic.
    In theory, the mic should plug in and then show up as an external device, but when I select iSight camera as my video source - the Powerbook automatically assumes that I want to use the internal mic as my audio source.
    Have tried to go to Sys Prefs and change 'Input' to USB - but no option to do so
    All help appreciated
    SK

    Hi thanks for the response
    unfortunately, it's got nothing to do with MIDI (which is just a series of controller information)
    The Blue 'Snowball' External mic is essentially a 'USB Device' and should be recognised as such by the Mac. The data will come in as 16bit, 44.1khz AES bit stream and then be assigned a destination.
    The problem is that iMovie does NOT allow me to separate the iSight camera from recording with 'internal mic'
    I want a way of finding how to seperate them - and then assign the USB mic to be associated with the iSight camera - giving me iMovie/iSight videos - with PROFESSIONAL sound
    sorry if i didn't make this clear
    thanks again
    sk

  • Very poor quality when viewing DVD on TV

    Hello,
    I have searched this forum high and low, but every response I have tried to this issue does not seem to work. If anyone can help, it would be greatly appreciated. I am using FCS2 on a new 8-core Intel Mac Pro desktop. All of the footage is shot on High Def AVCHD Cameras and ripped from Log and Transfer in FCP. My video is about 1 hour, 5 minutes. The problem I have is that the quality looks great in the MOV file export, but when I burn it to a DVD, it looks like garbage. It's all grainy and the quality a really poor. Here is my workflow:
    1) Video is created in Final Cut Pro (no chapters at this point), its all 1 video
    2) Video is exported using Quicktime. I use the selected settings, and uncheck Recompress All Frames, and select use chapter markers
    3) I compress the video for SD DVD in Compressor, using 120min Best Quality DVD, default settings with this option.
    4) I put the audio and video file in my assets for DVD Studio Pro, then Drag them onto the video. I removed the menu item, and changed the video to "play first". I then click Format/Burn.
    The DVD formats and burns, and it plays fine. But the quality *****. The raw MOV file looks great. It's clearly interlaced yet at the time of export from FCP, but I am assuming that is normal. Any ideas, or am I doing anything wrong?
    Thanks,
    Brandon
    Message was edited by: Brandon Rohde

    Brandon,
    I suspect we are missing a few factors in your situation. Let me ask a few questions and make a suggestion or two so we can figure this thing out.
    1) What is the make and model of your TV?
    2) Are you telling DVD Studio Pro that the movie you've converted to SD is anamorphic?
    3) You did tell Compressor you wanted the SD movie to be 16:9, didn't you?
    4) To help troubleshoot, try this: In FCP, mark In to Out around a ten second portion of the Timeline, and go to File > Export > QuickTime Movie. Make it self contained but do not re-compress all frames.
    5) Quit FCP, open DVDSP and change the Preferences in DVDSP to create an HD DVD title. Import the QT Movie you exported from FCP, drop it into a vidoe track, make it a First Play on the disc and Format it onto your hard drive. Play it in DVD Player and tell us how it looks.
    6) If it looks fine, burn it to a DVD disc and play it in your Apple computer. How does it look?
    7) Now create a new project in DVDSP, make it a SD DVD project, import the same QT Movie you exported from FCP. Drop it into a video track, make it First Play on the disc, and Format it. Play it in DVD Player. How does it look?
    8) Then burn it to a DVD and play it on your Apple computer. How does it look?
    9) Now, play it in an external DVD player on am SD television. How does it look?
    Please do all that, then reply back to this thread with the answers to all of these questions. I think we'll be closer to resolving the problem after that.
    Do not reformat your hard drive or reinstall your OS yet. It is far too soon for that over-reaction. Maybe later, but I seriously doubt that will help anything.

  • Poor quality when importing from sony dcr-sr58

    Dear All
    I've got a sony dcr-sr58e video camera, and for ages the quality has been poor, once i've, a) imported the footage from the camera into imovie then b) from there to idvd then c) watching it back on a tv
    I thought it was just me being fussy, but friends and colleagues have noticed that its quality is comparable with an old vhs video camera!
    I put all the settings to the max (high quality etc....)on the camera but to no effect, and have checked the settings on imovie
    The sony support have stated that its probably a problem with imovie (which it doesn't seem to be)
    Fot the record i'm running OSX 10.6.8  with imovie version 9.0.4
    If anyone else has had a similar problem and solve dit i'd be very grateful to hear
    Thanks
    Kelly

    Hello kellyfromkenley, Depending on how you move the video or share the video from iMovie to iDVD it can make a big difference. One way is to go to the Share Menu > Share to iDVD. But the better is to Share to Media Browser instead. Try this:
    Go back to iMovie and open your Project in Project Library.
    Go to Share Menu > Share to Media Browser
    Choose the Large size and let it run until it finishes
    Quit iMovie and open iDVD.
    In iDVD click on the Media Button, then click on the Movies button and look for your project under the iMovie star icon in the Media Browser itself.
    Drag that project icon into the iDVD project window and burn another disk
    I think you'll see an increase in the visual quality using this method.
    The reason this has an effect on the visual quality is there's a whole different set of operations performed on the video when you first Share to Media Browser. The side effect of those changes in steps is a much better looking DVD from your iMovie project.

  • Poor quality when using headphone jack as a 'line o

    I have a Creative Zen microphoto, and am very disappointed with the audio quality achieved when I plug it into my car stereo, and into the stereo in my home. For both I am using the headphone socket as a line output and am turning up the volume.For the car I am using a Sony cassette adapter (costing approx ?5) to feed into the stereo. At home, I am using a mini jack to phono connector (costing approx ?8) to feed into the aux line input on the stereo.
    It is alarming how good a CD sounds on the stereo, compared to a very high quality WMA file on the Zen plaid through the stereo line input.
    Do I need much higher quality connecting cables - or is the Zen known to be weak when its output is amplified through other hifi equipment via the headphone output?

    Its funny, because i'm doing the EXACT same thing with mine... i have one headphone to rca cord and one cassete adapter cord but to tell you the truth it always sounds good on anything i play it through, but i noticed that if you are using the standard headphones that come with the player, and you have changed your eq, well then you have to mess with your eq for when you plug it into a higher quality output device (such as a large stereo) because whatever your plugging it into has its own eq as well, and i noticed at one point the eq on the player and the eq on the stereo were contrasting terribly, and all you have to do is adjust... also, keep the volume on the player at about 5-20... any louder and it usually creates fuzz, so just turn up the other device you have it plugged into...
    hope i could help

  • Poor quality when uploaded to youtube, etc.

    My iMovie videos look great on my monitor. However when I upload them to video sites like Youtube, Google videos, Viddler, etc, the resulting video quality is very poor. I've submitted them as .avi, mp4, quicktime. Doesn't make any difference; they all turn out looking bad.
    Is there a way to correct this?

    Is there a way to correct this?
    Not totally. You may, however, be able to improve the quality but, in the end, you are simply limited to the quality that is compatible with the rather low data rates used by such sites when they convert your files to FLV for display. Basically, you are submitting a file from iMovie '08 as either a "Mobile" (a 480 width clip targeted at 1.0 Mbps) or "Medium" (640 width clip at 1.7 Mbps) and YouTube scales it down to a 320 width clip with a total data rate between 0.10 Mbps and 0.35 Mbps which is probably selected automatically depending on the actual length and quality of your submission.
    I'm not a YouTube user, but my general advice would be to keep your submissions short to maximize "headroom" during the conversion process. (I.e., don't submit a max duration or high data rate clip since it simply means that YouTube will have to discard a higher percentage of your data during the transcoding process to Sorenson H.264/MP3 making the visual differences between your submitted source file and the FLV file even more obvious to your eyes.)
    Also, here is an article you might find interesting to read: Encoding for YouTube Using Compressor
    My personal advice would be to upload files in a better quality compression format to a personal web site if you really want to control the quality of your output display.

  • Poor quality when reducing size of raster layer

    When reducing the size of an image layer, I am seeing very different quality between regular raster layers and smart object layers.
    See this image for an example:
    Both versions of the image were resized after duplicating the same source layer.
    They were then resized to 20% of their original size.
    In the top example, the layer was resized immediately after being duplicated.
    In the bottom example the layer was converted to a smart object before resizing.
    You will notice that the top version of the image has considerably more artifacting than the bottom.
    The quality of the raster layer size reduction also seems to have degraded since CS5.
    I am using the bicubic setting in Preferences > General > Image Interpolation.
    Switching that option around has made very little difference.
    Does anyone have any insight into this?
    Are others seeing the same phenomenon?
    Thanks

    In CS6, like CS5, the resampling method when transforming a Smart Object is that which is defined in Preferences > General. However, unlike CS5, CS6 has an independent resampling control in the Options bar when a raster layer is being transformed. Looks like you had Nearest Neighbour selected there.

  • Very poor quality when importing a video done with CAMSTUDIO

    Hi,
    I am using a video done in camstudio. THe source video is perfect, very sharp all excellent.
    when i bring it into Priemiere CS4, the quality ebcomes horrible making it almost unviewable (for annoying)
    you cans ee here the final result (horrible)
    http://vimeo.com/13357742
    while the original result was awesome....
    The video captures in Camstudio was full screen, the Premiere Settings where set at DV, Widescreen...but trying other settings didn't help either
    Some help please
    thank you

    What frame rate did you use for the screen cap?
    What frame rate did you use to process the .camrec files?
    What format and codec did you use to process the .camrec files?
    Do you need to show the whole screen for the whole video?  If so, you need a Pr sequence that matches the frame size of your screen cap.  If you want to zoom in to highlight certain areas of the screen, then you need a smaller frame size for your Pr sequence, but it still should have the same aspect ratio of the original capture.
    Finally, your screen cap is progressive.  Make sure your Pr sequence is set to No Fields.
    -Jeff

  • Poor quality when exporting Explain Everything Video

    Hi There,
    I've created some videos in using the "Explain Everything" App on my iPad. When I save the videos to my iPad camera roll and play them back they look fantastic.  When I emailed the videos to myself and opened them up in my MacBook, the quality is quite poor (blurry).  The same thing was true when I tried to open the emailed file back onto the same iPad it was originally created on.
    I'm hoping to be able to take these good quality videos and insert them into Final Cut Pro.
    Does anyone know why this might be happening?

    I know nothing about it, but is any help available here?

  • Why poor quality when I export in HD?

    I've shot some video on a Panaonic HDC-HS9, imported in original quality, edited it up, and want to export it in HD quality, for later use on DVD and YouTube HD.
    When I export it using the standard setting HD 1080x720 (in the export movie... option), the quality is pretty poor, nowhere near HD standard, although the original footage is crystal clear.
    Am I importing wrongly? Exporting wrongly?
    The exported files are about 100MB per minute, so should look very sharp on my MacBook screen, rather than fuzzy.

    I'm kind of a novice at this stuff, but if you select "Export using QuickTime..." instead of "Export Movie...", you have a lot more options to choose from. In particular, you can choose a 1920 x1080 resolution, which should improve the quality of your movie (but it will take about 4x longer to export and the file will be about 3x bigger). There are a lot of other choices as well... wish I knew what they all meant!

Maybe you are looking for