POR (BUS2209) in SRM 5.0 (Extended Classic scenario)

Hi Experts,
I configured the BUS2209 transaction type (Purchase Order Response) and it is working fine in SRM 5.0 -> i am able to create POR for a PO. But when i check the PO in ECC, the "Delivery Date" field updated with the confirmed date from POR in SRM.
In this flow I would like to have an "AB - Order Acknowledgmenet" in ECC PO at "Confirmations" tab and I don't want the system to update the original "Delivery Date" in ECC PO.
Is there any standard solution for my problem or I should consider a development here?
Thanks in advance for your help!
Best Regards,
Attila

Hi Manjunath,
The functionality of POR is fine in SRM. Our requirement is when a POR is generated in SRM and the information is sent to ECC (to update the PO) we do not want the system to update the "Delivery Date" field in the ECC PO automaticaly. In this case we would like the system to create one line in the "Confirmations" tab in ECC PO, because in this case we can monitor the delay between the expected delivery date and the confirmed delivery date (we have some reports in ECC which should consider the data from ECC -> when the confirmation is done directly in ECC that's fine...but now we have to figure out this "problem")
Thanks for your help!
Regards,
Attila

Similar Messages

  • Use of Purchase info records in SRM SC in Extended Classic scenario

    Hi All,
    We have implemented SRM 7.13 with Extended classic scenario. If we have Purchase info record in SAP ECC for the material, it gets populated in SRM SC in Source of supply Tab but the price of Purchase info record does not get updated in the SC line item.
    Can anyone let me know which configurations is required to fetch the Purchase info record price or we need to have a customization to achieve this.
    Thanks,
    Ankur

    HI Ankur
    when you say the price did not get updated did you check the sequence which is used for price determination ?
    1. User entry
    2. Contracts
    3.  Info record
    If still you think it is an issue please check the report  EBP_GET_BACKEND_PRICES and let me know if your problem gets fixed?
    Regards
    Vinita

  • P-card  process available for SRM 5.0 extended classic scenario

    Hello,
    I didn't find the information, so I'm posting this message.
    Is  the p-card functionality available for the extended classic scenario in SRM 5.0 ?

    Hi,
    Use of Procurement Cards are supported in Extended calssic scenario from SRM 2007 ..onwards
    HTH
    Rajesh

  • SRM with PPS = Extended Classic Scenario

    Does SRM Procurement for Public Sector (PPS) require Extended Classic Scenario? If so, could some one refer me to an official documentation that states such? Thanks.

    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/SRM/PPS-ProcurementforPublicSector-+enhancements
    PPS is only possible by ECS only.
    Muthu

  • Service base IV flag need to be set for SRM PO u2013 SRM 7.0 Extended classic

    Hello
    We are on  SRM 7.0  Extended classic scenario -  business have following requirement  with Service PO
    Invoice need to be posted with reference to conformation (SES) u2013 While creating a service PO  when user maintain  GR required  flag ,  u201CConfirmation-Based Invoice Verificationu201D flag get automatically set  but when PO replicated in ECC, it has  only GR base IV  flag ticked and not the Service base IV  which is required  from Invoicing perspective
    On SRM PO unlike ECC PO  there is only provision to maintained GR base IV and not SR base IV. So how can we achieve this
    Can we do it via BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI.   
    Note : SR base IV  flag cannot be maintained in Vendor master in ECC  because of  business constrain  so it has to be pass from SRM PO only

    Hello,
    Make some tests using R/3 BAdI BBP_PO_INBOUND_BADI.
    Nevertheless, only BBP_MAP_BEFORE_BAPI method has field SRV_BASED_IV in changing parameter BAPI_POITEM.
    Regards.
    Laurent.

  • Extended Classic Scenario Pricing issue, can I over come by using SRM-MDM?.

    Hi SRM GURU'S,
    I am using  ECC 6.0, SRM 5.5, SUS, LAC, cFolders and SRM-MDM with Extended Classic Scenario.
    My Question is : In case of Extended classic scenario, there is issue with Pricing and conditions. Is there any possibility to overcome this issue by using SRM-MDM. Or do I have to go for IPC. My client has not brought IPC. I have to cover Pricing with the above components.
    Anyone suggest me, how to proceed.  Thanks in Advance. Awaiting for quick response.
    Thanks & Regards,
    John.

    Hi Masa,
    We can maintain Price and conditions as a record in CCM for Particular Material or Vendor. When you add that record to shopping cart it will update. I mean, If the provision is available in MDM, I don't want to use the Two components for same functionality.
    If I use IPC, Is there separate license for that. What else need to be updated to use IPC (Patches etc).
    If you have IPC configuration material, could you please share with me? How to bridge the SRM Conditions and ECC Conditions?
    Please clearly give me details.  I really appreciate you.
    Regards,
    John.

  • SRM 7 : Vendor record replication in backend with Extended Classic Scenario

    Hello,
    We are implementing SRM 7 with Extended Classic Scenario and Supplier Self-registration.
    Can you explain what is to be configured to get the new vendors replicated to the backend?
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    It is possible to transfer suppliers to ERP system, if you use 'Supplier registration with ERP' scenario. After registration and acceptance, newly registered suppliers would appear on supplier monitor from where you can transfer them to backend system.
    Check the below link for more details:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/cf/35074152aff323e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
    Regards,
    Sanjeev

  • Extended Classic Scenario - Can Purchase Requsition be created in R/3?

    Hi SRM Gurus,
    In Extended Classic Scenario, Is it possible to have Purchase Req to be created in the backend?
    Technically whether it is possible or not? Functionally, there is no such need, I agree.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Ramkumar

    Hi
    Please confirm what sceanrio in SRM are you planning for ?
    I have not tried this. In Extended Classic Scenario, using BADI " BBP_TARGET_OBJTYPE"    -> I guess, it's possible, but not sure. Try it out. 
    Purchase Order (PO) will be created in the R/3 system using the BADI -  BBP_TARGET_OBJTYPE. Please read the standard documentation of this BADI, before implementing the same.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • PO approval process in ECC for extended classic scenario

    Hi All,
    At this moment we are using SAP ECC for procure to pay process. In the existing system set up, our ECC purchase order goes for approval via SAP enterprise portal(EP). We are planing to implement SRM 7.0 Extended classic scenario, so that user can take the advantage of creating PO in their web portal. We don't want to disturb our existing ECC PO approval process at this point of time.  
    So our requirement is :
    User will create PO in SRM. Same PO will replicated in ECC and the PO will goes for approval in in ECC and the PO output will generate in ECC. Can it me possible in extended classic scenario ?
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Jennifer
    Edited by: Jennifer Batty on Aug 8, 2011 5:08 PM

    Hi Jennifer,
    Since SRM PO will be leading PO in extended classic scenario, why donot you design the process controlled workflow in line with the existing release strategy that you are using for ECC PO?
    Thanks and regards,
    Ranjan
    Ranjan Sutradhar

  • GR based IV check box suppressed - Extended Classic Scenario

    Hello Folks,
    How are you doing today ?
    We are working in SRM 5.0 Extended Classic scenario.
    When created the Local PO in SRM with GR Based IV Check box active, the
    follow-on back-end Purchase order is generated without this flag. In
    other terms, system is creating the follow-on ECC PO without GR Based
    IV check box active. As a result, we are unable to run the ERS cycle.
    Back-end system in above scenario is ECC 6.0. And vendor settings are
    maintained with GR based IV flag on in both ECC and SRM.
    Kindly advice.
    Thank you for your assistance !

    Hi Ravi and Yann,
    Thank you for your inputs. OSS note-956083 can not be applied in my case due to the hight system version (patch level 550).
    I have already raised this issue to SAP, but in the lack of proper infrastrucure SAP can not access the system. (BASIS guys are still struggling with it)
    Well...let me give you recap-
    We have not activated nor implemented any BAdi so far (Vanila SRM 5.0 EC scenario) PO creation for goods is working fine and as desired. But when it come across with PO with limit item or services, system throws an error as -
    "PO 5100000263: Service-based invoice verif. requires GR "NO" or G R-based invoice verif."
    Would deeply appreciate if you guys can share insight on this issue.
    Thank you for your assistance!

  • POR transferred into MM(Backend) system in Extended Classic Scenario

    I am working on standard EBP-SUS Extended Classic Scenario. We have SRM Server 7.0 SP9 
    As we are successfully send PO from EBP to SUS.
    Issue : On working to Purchase Order Response,i am getting POR sent by SUS to EBP but we are not getting it replicated to MM.
    Our Concerns about is it need extra configuration required or need to have apply some note to getting replicated POR in MM from EBP or have to configure some XI Scenario to replicate POR from SRM EBP to MM.
    As we know that Extended Classic Scenario supports till Purchase Order Response still we are not getting Purchase Order Response in MM.
    Please tell us, Provided Solution will  be really appreaciated.
    Thanks.
    Regards,
    Pawan Keshwani

    hi,
    Pls see the foll notes:
    Note 576349 - Terms of payment in the ECS
    Note 541934 - Modification note: Copying base date from T052
    Note 953999 - ECS: Terms of Payment values not in PO header
    <b>Note 940453 - Backend payment term data not updated in the extended PO
    Note 945018 - Incoterms data not transferred to the back end</b>
    BR,
    Disha.
    Pls reward points for useful answers.

  • SRM 7.0 extended classic - attachments to backend

    Hi,
    We are in SRM 7.0 and have a requirement to store SRM attachments in the backend ERP.
    This is for the extended scenario going through Badi BBP_ECS_PO_OUT.
    Has anyone got a solution for moving the attachments to the backend?
    Kind regards,
    Alexander

    Hi,
    The purchase order in the Extended Classic Scenario is transferred to the backend system with different Function Modules. The
    attachment transfer logic was only implemented in the Classic Scenario.
    One reason for this decision was, that the leading Purchase Order in the extended classic scenario is the local one, and in the local purchase order the attachments are available.
    At the moment it is not planned to support the attachment transfer in the Extended Classic Scenario. The transfer of attachments to backend PO is developed only for Classic Scenario.
    I am sorry that this is not the result that you wanted. This also explains why in the ECS PO transfer BADI BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI does not have the parameters for attachments where as the Classic PO transfer
    BADI does (BBP_CREATE_BE_PO_NEW).
    We have some notes related to SC and POR reporting issues when transferring attachments to ECC side, but ther are related to Classic scenario:
    1400088: SC attachments transferred to ECC PR are lost on EHP upgrade
    1413792  Attachment deleted after changing purchase order
    Ihope this information help you to understand this issue,
    Kind Regards,
    Rafael Rhoden

  • PO text transfer to Back-end in case of Extended Classic Scenario in SRM 4.

    Dear experts,
    My system is in SRM 4.0 in Extended Classic Scenario. We use in the PO internal note text and vendor But thses texts are not transfered to Back-end.
    Is it normal?
    Do I need to customize something?
    Can it be achieved by BADi? How then?
    OR is it only possible from SRM 5.0?
    Thanks in advance
    RD

    Yes you can do this. Implement BADI BBP_CREATE_BE_PO_NEW, Refer parameter IS_SC_DOCUMENT>LONGTEXT,  and CS_PO_DOCUMENT>IT_PO_ITEM_TEXT. Map the exact text-id of the R/3.
    Note: if this BADI is not present, use BBP_CREATE_PO_BACK
    Regards, IA

  • SRM: Extended Classic scenario: Request your help.

    Hi Guru's,
    We are implementing the EXTENDED CLASSIC SCENARIO in our project. kindly request your help.
    in our project the SRM box is :  G3OSBSR102.
    R/3 backend Box is :   RCHSBR3142.
    Now when i create a shopping cart it should create the Purchase order In SRM( G3OSBSR102) and also copy the created purcahse order in teh backend system : RCHSBR3142.
    The issue here is which Logical system should be populated in the field at item level when creating the shopping cart :BE_LOG_SYSTEM.
    1) In this field: BE_LOG_SYSTEM.
    If i populate the SRM local: G3OSBSR102., then it will consider the Business object type as : BUS2201and creates the local Po but while transfering this local created document(PO) to R/3 system is loosing the Logical system at the item level of the PO.
    If i populate this field at the item level via DEBUGG mode then system is sucessfull in transferring the document to R/3.
    2)  In this field: BE_LOG_SYSTEM.
    If i populate the SRM local: RCHSBR3142, then it will consider the Business object type as : BUS2012 and creates the purchase order in R/3 system and will not create teh local purchase order.
    Kindly request your help for any further settings if i did miss.Appreciate your help in this regards.
    Many Thanks,
    Prasad NN.

    Dear Prasad,
    To work on Extended Classic Scenario, you just have to maintain the following configuration in SPRO:
    >SAP Supplier Relationship Management
    >SRM Server
      >Cross-Application Basic Settings
       >Activate Extended Classic Scenario
    Check the flag "Extended Classic Scenario Active".
    You dont have to manipulate "BE_LOG_SYSTEM" field to choose your scenario.
    Regards
    Thiago Salvador

  • SRM Extended Classic Scenario

    HI,
    Please let me know in the extended classic scenario when the PO is created in SRM does the same PO  number gets created in the backend system.Also is the PO created in the Backend system can be opened in transaction ME21N or it can be viewed only in ME22N transaction.
    Thanks,
    Manu

    While configuring consultant has to maintain the same number range in both systems. This way the PO number created in SRM system remains the same as in backend ECC system.
    This PO is only readable in backend system. Only ME23.. transactions can be used to view this. If user is allowed to modiify this PO in backend system it will lead to inconsistency between the systems.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Mac Mini unable to connect to wireless

    Hello there, I have a 1.66ghz Mac Mini with OSX 10.4.11 I am trying to connect to my wireless router but am having some difficulty. The Airport can see my router in the menu, and when I enter the password, it processes for about 30 seconds then says

  • Directory ORACLE_HOME doesn't exist. in Database Upgrade 11.2.0.2

    Hi all, I am following the below document for database upgrade on EBS 12.1.3 database from 11.1.0.7 to 11.2.0.2. "Interoperability Notes EBS R12 with Database 11gR2 [ID 1058763.1]" We have completed upto 6.     Install Oracle Database 11g Products fr

  • I recently lost my Ipod touch which my email is linked to.

    So yesterday at work (which is freight company) I lost my Ipod touch 4thGen. I have my email linked to it and get emails from clients and other personal stuff. If I change my pass on my yahoo account would it ask to sing in  on my lost Ipod?

  • Limit items in SC

    Hi, What are limit items and can we create a shopping cart for limit item in SRM. I guess Po can be created for the same. Please advise. Thanks, Manu

  • Cannot associate: No matching privacy setting

    I am trying to create a wireless bridge with 2 1200 AP. The "Client" is giving me this error message: Interface Dot11Radio0, cannot associate: No matching privacy setting (from 001b.d5c8.ce80) This is the master config: version 12.3 no service pad se