Port Analizer Port gigabit cisco 7600 SIP-400 SPA-5X1GE-V2

Hi,
I have a Wan LINK  (Layer 3), so I want to check if there are retransmissions in this link.
Do you know if there is a way that a can do SPAN on a GigabitEthernet Port on SPA-5X1GE-V2 (Cisco 7600 Platform)
I tried but i got this error:
R(config)#monitor session 10 source int GigabitEthernet 4/0/0
% Interface(s) Gi4/0/0 not supported as monitor source(s) on this platform
Cisco IOS Software, c7600rsp72043_rp Software (c7600rsp72043_rp-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 15.1(2)S, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
Copyright (c) 1986-2011 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
  4    0  4-subslot SPA Interface Processor-400  7600-SIP-400      
  5    2  Route Switch Processor 720 (Active)    RSP720-3CXL-GE
 4/0 5xGE SPA                    SPA-5X1GE-V2     
thanks for the Help.

Hi,
Does anyone have any suggestions?

Similar Messages

  • PPPoE Cisco 6500 + 7600-SIP-400

    Hello,
    we use a lot of Cisco 6500 switches across our network. I bought one 7600-SIP-400 with one SPA-5X1GE-V2 module.
    Unfortunatelly I have found that there is no command support for PPPoE in my IOS version 12.2 SXI13. 
    Can somebody tell me which IOS version do I have to use to get command support for PPPoE Server?
    Thank you.
    Milan

    "Doesn't have to be a Cisco box. "
    If you're still interested in solving this (or haven't already), you can mail me at [email protected]
    Cheers,
    Anton

  • Can we use SPA-4XOC3-POS-V2 on 7600-SIP-400

    Hi,
    We have ordered 2 x SPA-4XOC3-POS to use on 7604, we have received SPA-4XOC3-POS-V2 from our supplier.
    I know that the SPA-4XOC3-POS-V2 are for the 12000, is there a way to use them on a 7600-SIP-400??
    Any help is appreciated.
    Thank you.
    Hitch

    This SPA is not supported on SIP-400 on 7600s. You need to get a NON V2 SPA.
    Atif

  • (Linecard image not present) at WS-SSC-600 and 7600-SIP-400

    i install two modules WS-SSC-600 and 7600-SIP-400 in slot 5 and 6 in 13-slot chassis and give this output from show power (Linecard image not present)
      for both cards.
    supervisor engine is : VS-S720-10G with sub-module VS-F6K-PFC3CXL and VS-F6K-MSFC3
    IOS : s72033-advipservicesk9-mz.122-33.SXI9
    what that mean and how to fix it ?

    Ok problem solved by upgrade ios to another version but the new image must contains (_wan) in image name for example (
    s72033-advipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-33.SXJ6 ) otherwise the two modules will not powered up.

  • 7600 SIP-400 looped to same 7600

    Hi,
    We are proposing to install SIP-400's into our PE's 7600 (sup32) in order to provide egress traffic shaping and qos for our customers.
    We are proposing to connect the SIP gig interfaces back to another line card on the same device, instead of putting another switch in front of our existing PE. This saves us a switch and lets us take advantage of the port density in our current 7600 PE's (which is why we purchased them in the first place).
    We also plan to utilise the same approach to implement pwe xconnects on the SIP-400 subinterfaces. VLAN uniqueness per port is the key feature of the SIP-400 that facilitates this.
    Has anyone run a similar setup? Any experiences to share?
    I have tested in the lab and can't see any issues so far.
    Does anyone know of a more cost effective qos / shaping solution for Ethernet tails? The SIP or ES20 based solutions seem overpriced for the pretty basic functionality we are after here. Doesn't have to be a Cisco box.
    Kent.

    "Doesn't have to be a Cisco box. "
    If you're still interested in solving this (or haven't already), you can mail me at [email protected]
    Cheers,
    Anton

  • Difference between OSM-2+4GE-WAN+ and 7600-SIP-400

    hy guys,
    If I want to use one of them as uplink, which are better ?

    Depending on your current and future requirements the decision for SIP-400 or OSM-GEWAN needs to be taken.
    As they both are different product sets meant to cater to different set of business requirements.
    SIP-400
    a) Provides you with capability to aggregate different flavours of
    OC12,OC48 and other WAN and GE Interfaces as well as use them for uplink,
    b) Supports VPLS
    c) Supports MQC with conventional QOS.
    d) Supports ATM Cell Relay.
    e) Occupies 1 slot space
    OSM-GEWAN.
    a) Provides only Gigabit aggregation and uplink.
    b) Supports VPLS.
    c) Doesnt support ATM Cell Relay.
    d) Supports MQC and conventional QOS.
    e) Occupies 1 slot space,
    Above are some difference in summary.
    But if you requirement is to have only Gig aggregation and Gig uplinks then OSM
    by far is a good choice. But if you have your aggregation done, and are looking for WAN aggregation with Enchanced features like conventional QOS and VPLS, Cell Relay etc, with the option if choosing the media types for your aggregation, then SIP-400 is vis-a-vis a good choice.
    This comparision doesnt take into consideration the throughput performance of both categories vis-a-vis.
    HTH-Cheers,
    Swaroop

  • SIP-400 SPA-2X1GE

    Does SPA interface (SPA-2X1GE) support DWDM SFP? What is maximum number of SPA-2x1GE in one SIP-400 module? Does OSM-4G and 7600-ES20 module support DWDM SFP. What is difference between those cards if we talk about this card as core-facing card, and which card is best solution for core-facing.

    Cisco XR 12000 Series SPA Interface Processor 10G 12000-SIP-600 support DWDM.
    SPA-2X1GE
    SPA-1XOC12-ATM
    SPA-8XCHT1/E1

  • M-CMTS with SIP-600 SPA

    Dear all,
    I have a few question regarding M-CMTS with SIP-600 SPA.
    - Scenario 1: I have a uBR10012 with linecard MG20X20V(0 DS, 20 US lic) + SIP 600 and i want to use M-CMTS with  SIP-600 connect to RFGW1/RFGW10. Is that possible to do like this?
    -Scenario 2: I have a uBR10012 with line card MG3GX60V (72DS, 60 US) + SIP 600, also have a RFGW1 with 98 DS, so I still have 16 DS available, can i use SIP-600 connect to that RFGW1 do use those available DS?
    I need some help/advice about those situations, please help me.

    Hello,
    Yes, it should.
    You could check Table 4-9 VPLS Feature Compatibility by SIP and SPA Combination:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/shared_port_adapters/configuration/7600series/76cfgsip.html#wp1270728
    There are some restricition about H-VPLS on c7600/SIP, like it could be seen at the "VPLS Configuration Guidelines"
    section of above link. But they are generic for SIP-600 itself:
    – H-VPLS with Q-in-Q edge—Requires a Cisco 7600 SIP-600 in the uplink, and any LAN port or Cisco 7600 SIP-600 on the downlink.
    - H-VPLS with MPLS edge requires either an OSM module, Cisco 7600 SIP-600, or Cisco 7600 SIP-400 in both the downlink (facing UPE) and uplink (MPLS core).
    As for SPAs - restriction is about H-VPLS and FastEthernet one:
    "Note: H-VPLS is not available on Fast Ethernet SPAs"
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/shared_port_adapters/configuration/7600series/76cfgeth.html#wp1196808
    Thanks,
    Sergey

  • 7600 SSC-400 / SSC-600 Design Limitation

    Hello,
    I want to know if there is any way we can overcome the restrictions on these cards, resulting in reload when an SSO happens on a Catalyst 6500 switch.
    Is there any new or upcoming model of SSC cards which will be SSO aware ?
    Restrictions:
    >VSPA state information is not maintained between the active and standby supervisor engine during normal operation. During a supervisor engine switchover in an SSO environment, the VSPA will reboot.
    >The Cisco 7600 SSC-400 is not Route Processor Redundancy Plus (RPR+) or Stateful Switchover (SSO) aware. As a result, the Cisco 7600 SSC-400 will reset if RPR+ or SSO is configured.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/shared_port_adapters/configuration/7600series/76ovwvpn.html#wp1108766
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/services_modules/vspa/configuration/guide/ivmovw.html#wp1051863
    Regards,
    Akhtar

    Hello,
    You will need both. The 7600-SSC-400 is the carrier module of the SPA-IPSec-2G.
    There is more information on this via the following link:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/shared_port_adapters/configuration/6500series/76ovwvpn.html
    Warm Regards,
    Rose

  • Can I run a cat5 cable to a 4 port hub from a cisco router then connect one of the hub's output ports to an airport express to 'extend' my wireless range?

    Can I run a cat5 cable to a 4 port hub from a cisco router then connect one of the hub's output ports to an airport express to 'extend' my wireless range?
    Flow would be
    Cable modem---->cisco e2000 wifi router (This is broadcasting wifi but not strong enough)---->4 port hub ---->airport express (to extend the wifi in another part of house)
    thanks!

    Yes, you can do this as you stated. In essence you will want to configure both routers for roaming network. Please check out the following Apple Support article that describes this type of network. Although this article uses two or more AirPorts, it can be done with just about any manufacturer's router.

  • SPA scale options on SIP-400

    Hi All,
    Are there any scalability limitations on 7600 with a SIP-400 module?
    Specifically looking for pointers in identifying the maximum number of 1xGig ports supported per SIP-400 on a 7600 router.
    Thanks
    ~sultan

    Hi Jerry,
    Thanks for your response.
    I am looking for a 'matrix' that gives me various combinations I can stick in, though you mention that each bay can support upto 2x1G or 5x1G, that is not the case.
    When I try to stick in 3 nos. of 2x1G V2 SPA I get a message something like capacity exhausted/expended etc... and the SPA goes 'down'. In addition there are loads of other SIP/SPA incompatibilities... I wonder how difficult it would have been to make a single SIP capable of having ALL the available SPAs in any combination... but then this is Cisco :-)
    I have also spoken to TAC, but the response was limited to 'Please check the product specifications'.
    Thanks
    ~sultan

  • Cannot configure service-policy on SIP-400

    I have cisco 7606 with SIP-400 on slot1 , and I try to apply service-policy output on the interface pos1/1/0, after enter the command, the system
    generate the error "queue-limit is invalid command w/o other queueing feature".
    Why I cannot apply the service-policy?

    Thanks Marcio.
    I have added failover details to the client's tnsnames file (see below), but still i get the '500 - The Network Adapter could not establish the connection' error:
    TESTDB =
    (DESCRIPTION =
    (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = lontestdb01-vip)(PORT = 1526))
    (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = lontestdb02-vip)(PORT = 1526))
    (LOAD_BALANCE = TRUE)
    (FAILOVER = TRUE)
    (CONNECT_DATA =
    (SERVER = DEDICATED)
    (SERVICE_NAME = ESTDB)
    (FAILOVER_MODE =
    (BACKUP=lontestdb02-vip)
    (TYPE=select)
    (METHOD=preconnect)
    (RETRIES=180)
    (DELAY=5)
    Bal - the output of crs_stat -t is as follows (please note the listener on node 1 is intentionally down)
    -bash-3.00$ crs_stat -t
    Name Type Target State Host
    ora....B1.inst application ONLINE ONLINE lonestdb01
    ora....B2.inst application ONLINE ONLINE lonestdb02
    ora....DB1.srv application ONLINE ONLINE lonestdb01
    ora....DB2.srv application ONLINE ONLINE lonestdb02
    ora....BOTH.cs application ONLINE ONLINE lonestdb01
    ora....DB1.srv application ONLINE ONLINE lonestdb02
    ora....LIVE.cs application ONLINE ONLINE lonestdb01
    ora....DB2.srv application ONLINE ONLINE lonestdb02
    ora....NDBY.cs application ONLINE ONLINE lonestdb02
    ora.ESTDB.db application ONLINE ONLINE lonestdb02
    ora....01.lsnr application OFFLINE OFFLINE
    ora....b01.gsd application ONLINE ONLINE lonestdb01
    ora....b01.ons application ONLINE ONLINE lonestdb01
    ora....b01.vip application ONLINE ONLINE lonestdb01
    ora....02.lsnr application ONLINE ONLINE lonestdb02
    ora....b02.gsd application ONLINE ONLINE lonestdb02
    ora....b02.ons application ONLINE ONLINE lonestdb02
    ora....b02.vip application ONLINE ONLINE lonestdb02
    Many thanks to everyone that's helped so far
    Rup

  • Cisco 7600 MPLS and set Qos group

    Hi, i'm am trying to use to following class-maps and policy maps on a Cisco 7600. The same maps have been used on both 3700 series and 7200 series. However when i try to apply IP_TO_MPLS_OUT and MPLS_TO_IP_IN on the 7600 (with SUP32 and 48 port gigabit blade) i get a message on the console
    "set qos group" not supported.
    I used the QoS group to carry the MPLS EXP value (as label would is popped) and this works well.
    How can i get the QoS group to work on the 7600, if not is there a valid workaround?
    Many thanks for your help.
    policy-map IP_TO_MPLS_OUT
    class qosgrp5
    set mpls experimental topmost 5
    priority percent 10
    class qosgrp4
    bandwidth remaining percent 50
    set mpls experimental topmost 4
    class qosgrp2
    bandwidth remaining percent 20
    set mpls experimental topmost 2
    class class-default
    bandwidth remaining percent 30
    random-detect
    set mpls experimental topmost 1
    policy-map CE_OUT
    class qosgrp5
    set ip precedence 5
    class qosgrp4
    set ip precedence 4
    class qosgrp2
    set ip precedence 2
    policy-map MPLS_TO_IP_IN
    class MPLS_EXP5
    set qos-group 5
    class MPLS_EXP4
    set qos-group 4
    class MPLS_EXP2
    set qos-group 2

    Hi,
    I'm not aware that you can use qos groups on c7600 (LAN ports ?).
    For the MPLS_TO_IP direction you can use 'mpls propagate-cos' on the egress interface as workaround. This rewrites the egress IP ToS with the internal DSCP (which is inferred from the topmost MPLS label).
    For the IP_TO_MPLS direction you could just match on the original DSCP ?
    cheers,
    Stefan

  • Configuring SYNCE/PTP on Cisco 7600 and Cisco MWR for NSN NodeB

    Hi to All,
    I would to ask for support on how i can establish the PTP between Cisco MWR 2941-DC and a NSN NodeB. The Cisco MWR is connected to a Cisco 7600 with SPA-2X1GE-SYNCE where the SSU/OSN clock is connected on the BITS ports. Hope you can assist me with the configurations.
    Thanks,
    Eugene

    Dear Genedeath,
      I have noticed that you posted this message since last year ..... have you ever been able to solve the case??
    I had a glance to the diagram and it looks quite similar to my case.
    I need to configure a Cisco MWR2941 for the very first time  in order to support SyncE for packet Abis between a NSN FlexyBSC and a NSN BTS.
    BTS---------------Gig x/y MWR Gig x/x-----------------------FlexyBSC
    I guess the source clock would be provided by BSC...
    Can you support me according to your experience ??
    thanks and regards!
    Mauro

  • Cisco 7600 Series Ethernet Services cards types & queue values

    Hello,
    There is different types for the Cisco 7600 Series Ethernet Services cards.
    ( More expensive cards with high queue values and less expensive cards with
    low queue values.)
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps368/data_sheet_c78-549419.html
    Hardware queues
    ES Plus XT 40G line cards
    • 128,000 ingress queues
    • 256,000 egress queues
    ES Plus XT 20G line cards
    *• 64,000 ingress queues*
    • 128,000 egress queues
    Hierarchical QoS (H-QoS)
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps368/data_sheet_c78-570730.html
    Hardware queues
    Cisco 7600 Series ES Plus Transport 40G and 20G Line Cards
    *Supporting up to 16 level 4 queues per physical port*
    Hierarchical QoS (H-QoS)
    Low queue cards have got only 4 queues per physical port. High queue cards
    have got minimum 64.000 queue. This is very huge difference.  In what kind
    of scenario do we have to use the High queue cards ? Could you give some
    examples please ?  Kind Regards.
    Burak

    HI Burak,
    Each time you configure a class with bandwidth allocation or shaping,.. a queue will be used so if you use such card to provide QoS for a lot of subscribers sharing the same interface, you will need a lot of them !!
    HTH
    Laurent.

Maybe you are looking for