Port channel configuration with VMware

Hi everyone, I have dual 6120 interconnects, each of which have two uplink ports. I also have two Catalyst 4900M switches to uplink to. So I plan to configure both 802.1q and 802.3ad on each of the 6120 uplink pairs. My question relates to the physical cabling, bearing in mind ESX will be running on the blades.
Would you cable both the uplink ports on interconnect 1 to switch 1? Or would you cross-connect them to both switch 1 and switch 2?
As per this article I see ESX does not support splitting a port channel across two switches, but I am unsure how the presence of the 6120s affects this. Can anyone suggest the best way of doing the cabling based on the kit I have? Thanks.
http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?cmd=displayKC&docType=kc&externalId=1001938&sliceId=1&docTypeID=DT_KB_1_1&dialogID=14912551&stateId=1%200%2014916516

Hey Simon, let's address this is two parts because there are two layers: server-bound (ESX-6120) and north-bound (6120-Cat4900).
At the ESX end, use the default srcPort in the vSwitch / port group with both 10GbE uplink ports (vmnic0 and vmnic1) set to active (not active/passive).  There are no loops in this configuration.  On the VNIC (in UCSM) you select trunk port and allow all the VLANs that your vSwitch port groups needs.  If you don't use a VLAN for the Service Console/ESXi Management, then make sure you set Native to the correct VLAN in the VNIC to allow untagged traffic down the right path.
At the 6120 you can't explicitly configure a trunk for border ports, they are already set so and when you add VLANs they are added to every border port trunk configuration.  You, of course, need to make sure the Cat4900 ports at the other end of the cable have the same trunkport VLAN configuration.
So in summary - set VLANs in vSwitch port groups, VNIC in UCSM and northbound switch. 
Now when it comes to port channels, you can only configure two or more border ports as a port channel if they are cabled to the same Cat4900.  If you had Nexus 5k/7k northbound then you could use vPC on them to allow "mesh" cabling (ie. one 6120 connects to both Nexus switches).  But as you aren't using Nexus you will end up with a configuration as Jeremy explained:
ESX --> vSwitch0 --> srcPort load balancing --> 2 active uplinks --> many port groups
6120-a --> Cat4900-a
6120-b --> Cat4900-b
However, I would still recommend using a couple of border ports in a port channel on each fabric to each Cat4900 because, if you pull out a cable/lose a port, then when that port is re-enabled the existing live traffic is redistributed whereas without the port channel only new traffic will be spread across both links.
Cheers
Steve
Cisco UCS Team

Similar Messages

  • WAAS Port Channel Configuration

    In the recent weeks we got some reports that CIFS writing performance to NETAPP OnTap 7.3 filer was degraded for WAAS accelerated connections.  NETAPP OnTAP 7.2  and native Microsoft filers were running fine. In our Testlab we could correlate this issue with the port channel setup on  our WAAS devices. With round robin (standard setting) the CIFS writing perforamce was poor. By switching  the port channel loadbalancing to src-dst-ip-port the performance was excellent.
    Is there any known best practices recommendation for port channel configuration on WAAS  devices?
    Many thanks in advance, Peter.

    The best practice depends on your network. Most deployments are fine with the default round robin configuration for port channel on the WAE. But I have encountered some installations where the configuration had to be changed in order to avoid out of order packets causing slow performance (like, if there is a firewall between the WAE and the server).
    Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

  • Clearing port channel configurations

    In one of my 6509s I've got a lot of old port channel configs listed that I can't remove. How do I remove them short of clearing the config entirely?
    Here's an example...
    set port channel 3/41-42 64
    set port channel 3/43-44 65
    set port channel 6/47-48 67
    set port channel 3/13-14 68
    set port channel 9/5-6 86
    set port channel 9/9-11 87
    set port channel 2/2 93
    set port channel 7/1-4 100
    set port channel 7/25-28 106
    set port channel 7/37-40 109
    set port channel 7/41-44 110
    set port channel 7/45-48 111
    set port channel 4/5-8 112
    set port lacp-channel 5/22,5/45 126
    set port channel 6/29-30 127
    set port channel 9/13-14 128
    set port channel 9/12 129
    set port channel 9/15-16 161
    set port channel 4/41 537
    set port channel 6/31-32 538
    set port channel 8/1-4 661
    set port channel 9/1-4 665
    set port channel 1/1,2/1 719
    set port channel 8/11-12 720
    set port channel 8/13-16 721
    set port channel 8/9-10 722
    set port channel 8/7-8 723
    set port channel 8/5-6 725
    set port channel 4/9-12 726
    set port channel 3/5-8 731
    set port channel 3/1-4 732
    set port channel 4/1-4 733
    set port channel 9/7-8 734
    set port channel 3/15-16 828
    I can't do a "clear port channel" or anything like that.

    Hi Friend,
    I don't think you can remove this commands from configuration till the time you reuse this ports with etherchannel configuration.
    The best idea will be copy the configuration from switch and paste it on a notepad and delete these lines and copy from notepad again and paste it on switch and I think this will take care of your issue.
    HTH, if yes please rate the post.
    Ankur

  • Port-channel problem with WiSM

    Has anybody met following similar problem:
    I put WiSM into slot 3(also tried slot 6) of 6506(sup720-3B, s72033-adventerprisek9_wan-mz.122-33.SXH.bin), using following command to setup the port-channel:
    interface Port-channel1
    switchport
    switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
    switchport trunk native vlan 5
    switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-1000
    switchport mode trunk
    int range g3/1-4
    switchport
    switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
    switchport trunk native vlan 5
    switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-1000
    switchport mode trunk
    channel-group 1 mode on
    I can use "session slot 3 pro 1" to login to the WiSM, but can't ping WiSM's management IP address from 6506, then I find the port-channel has problem, only G3/1 is up and included in the channel, G3/2-4 are up but line protocol is down, then I found from the log that: "AESUT: %EC-SP-5-CANNOT_BUNDLE2: Gi3/2 is not compatible with Gi3/1 and will be suspended (qos-card type unavailable for Gi3/2 or Gi3/1)". It says those GE port are not compatible for qos-card type, but I checked the configuration, all GE using the same configuration. Don't know why, maybe a bug? Appreciate for any feedback

    I have the same problem, but it has something to do with QoS. When you disable "mls qos" on the switch, the port-channel will function normal again.
    It doesn't help when you configure "mls qos trust dscp" on the port-channel!!!!!

  • Port-channel issue with FI-N7k using rate-mode share

    Hi Dears,
    I'm trying to using port-channel between Fabric Interconnect (FI) and N7K. in N7K use rate-mode share and LACP but the port-channel in N7K was suspended.
    I was trying :
    1. I using non dedicated port in Nexus 7010.
          - rate-mode share
          - channel-group 1 mode active
          - switchport mode trunk
    when i using this option, the port-channel in Nexus 7010 was suspended
    2. I using non dedicated port in Nexus 7010
         - rate-mode share
         - channel group 1 mode on
         - switchport mode trunk
    when i using this option, the port-channel in Nexus 7010 was came up, but in Fabric interconnect was failed.
    3. I using dedicated port in Nexus 7010
         - rate-mode share
         - channel group 1 mode active
         - switchport mode trunk
    when i using this option, the port-channel in Nexus 7010 was suspended
    4. I using dedicated port in Nexus 7010
         - rate-mode dedicated
         - channel group 1 mode active
         - switchport mode trunk
    when i using this option, the port-channel in Nexus 7010 was came up and running well.
    is any other way to configure port-channel in N7K with rate-mode share and LACP ?
    or it's some of limitation in port-channel when using rate-mode share at N7K ?
    nb: fabric interconnect only support LACP and cannot be configurable.
    regards,
    Berwin H

    HI Mark,
    1. Can you please check your ethernet card ...where this port channel connected..on the server.
        may be there are 2 different card.
    2. from cisco websites:
    Error Message
    Explanation
    This port has different port attributes than other ports within the port channel.
    Recommended Action
    Match the port attributes to that of the port channel.
    Regards
    Please rate if it helps.
    Match the port attributes to that of the port channel.This port has different port attributes than other ports within the port channel.
    EC-5-CANNOT_BUNDLE_LACP: [char] is not compatible with aggregators in
    channel [dec] and cannot attach to them ([char])

  • Port Channel 5548 with 6509

    My company just purchased a Nexus 5548.  I've been fooling around with the configurations and just getting familiar with this equipment.  I've already configured a port channel using 2 10gig ports on our 3850 and its working fine.
    Now, I'm trying to configure a second port channel with our 6509 1gig ports. Ports comes up. But I cannot communicate between these 2 devices.
    Show CDP Neigh shows the other devices. Show Etherchannel summary is blank
    This is the config on the 6509
    interface Port-channel22
     switchport
     switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
     switchport mode trunk
    interface GigabitEthernet9/7
      switchport
     switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
     switchport mode trunk
     channel-group 22 mode on (I also tried using Active and desirable)
    Config on 5548
    Inteface Port-Channel 2
    switchport
     switchport mode trunk
     speed 1000
    interface ethernet1/32
     switchport mode trunk
     speed 1000
     channel-group 22 mode on
    I also have feature Lacp , interface vlan and vlan dot1q tag native enabled
    Any ideas why I cannot communicate between these devices? 

    This is what is showing on the 5548
    2015 Mar 18 08:18:09 DC-5548-01 %ETHPORT-5-SPEED: Interface Ethernet1/32, operat
    ional speed changed to 1 Gbps
    2015 Mar 18 08:18:09 DC-5548-01 %ETHPORT-5-IF_DUPLEX: Interface Ethernet1/32, op
    erational duplex mode changed to Full
    2015 Mar 18 08:18:09 DC-5548-01 %ETHPORT-5-IF_RX_FLOW_CONTROL: Interface Etherne
    t1/32, operational Receive Flow Control state changed to off
    2015 Mar 18 08:18:09 DC-5548-01 %ETHPORT-5-IF_TX_FLOW_CONTROL: Interface Etherne
    t1/32, operational Transmit Flow Control state changed to off
    2015 Mar 18 08:18:09 DC-5548-01 %ETHPORT-5-SPEED: Interface port-channel2, opera
    tional speed changed to 1 Gbps
    2015 Mar 18 08:18:09 DC-5548-01 %ETHPORT-5-IF_DUPLEX: Interface port-channel2, o
    perational duplex mode changed to Full
    2015 Mar 18 08:18:09 DC-5548-01 %ETHPORT-5-IF_RX_FLOW_CONTROL: Interface port-ch
    annel2, operational Receive Flow Control state changed to off
    2015 Mar 18 08:18:09 DC-5548-01 %ETHPORT-5-IF_TX_FLOW_CONTROL: Interface port-ch
    annel2, operational Transmit Flow Control state changed to off
    2015 Mar 18 08:18:09 DC-5548-01 %ETH_PORT_CHANNEL-5-PORT_UP: port-channel2: Ethe
    rnet1/32 is up
    2015 Mar 18 08:18:09 DC-5548-01 %ETH_PORT_CHANNEL-5-FOP_CHANGED: port-channel2:
    first operational port changed from none to Ethernet1/32
    2015 Mar 18 08:18:09 DC-5548-01 %ETHPORT-5-IF_UP: Interface Ethernet1/32 is up i
    n mode trunk
    2015 Mar 18 08:18:09 DC-5548-01 %ETHPORT-5-IF_UP: Interface port-channel2 is up
    in mode trunk
    My 6509 does not show anything. Now when I do  a show etherchannel summary on the 6509, the protocol is lacp.

  • Port-channel configuration 3560X and 2960S

    Hello,
    I am trying to connect a 2960 swith to 3560X using port channel. I have configred the switches with the following configratuion and connected them with straight ethernet cable, the link came up and then it went int err-disable state. I re-enabled the links and connected them using one cross over cable it connected and remained connected for a whole day in my lab. When I shut down both switches and took them the server room and connected both ports using cross over cable it came up and then went into err-disable state. Bellow is my configuration, can you please point out to me what I am missing: (no VTP domain configured on any of the switches)
    ------------------2960 configuration----------------------
    interface Port-channel1
    switchport trunk native vlan 999
    switchport mode trunk
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/51
    switchport trunk native vlan 999
    switchport mode trunk
    channel-group 1 mode on
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/52
    switchport trunk native vlan 999
    switchport mode trunk
    channel-group 1 mode on
    ------------------3560X configuration-------------------------------
    interface Port-channel1
    switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
    switchport trunk native vlan 999
    switchport mode trunk
    interface GigabitEthernet0/23
    switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
    switchport trunk native vlan 999
    switchport mode trunk
    channel-group 1 mode
    interface GigabitEthernet0/24
    switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
    switchport trunk native vlan 999
    switchport mode trunk
    channel-group 1 mode on
    Thank you.

    Hi,
    Your condig looks good and straightthrough cable should work just fine.  Can you do the following:
    take the interfaces out of the portchannel
    shut the portchannel
    shut the interfaces
    add the interfaces to the portchannel
    "no sh" the PO and test again?
    This should bring up the interface and the portchannel
    HTH

  • SG300 Port-Channel Configuration

    We have an SG300 52P and a SG300 28P that we need to LAG/Trunk together, but have had a hell of a time doing it.  Both switches are updated to 1.3.0.62.  The 52 port switch is configured in layer 3, the 28 port switch in layer 2.  All connectivity that is directly connected to the 52 port works as intended, but no traffic on the 28 port over the port channel to VLANs outside the native VLAN are working.  Strangely too, it is possible to ping the 28 port from a serial connection on the 52 port on the native vlan address, but cannot access the management interface over ethernet.  The last 4 ports of each switch are part of the port channel.
    Here are the two configurations:
    52 Port:
    vlan database
    vlan 2,4,6,8,10,100
    ip dhcp relay address 10.0.4.10
    ip dhcp relay address 10.0.4.14
    ip dhcp relay enable
    ip name-server  10.0.4.10 10.0.4.14
    hostname CORE-SW1
    ip ssh server
    ip ssh pubkey-auth
    snmp-server server
    snmp-server community public ro 10.0.4.5 view Default
    interface vlan 1
    Name ReserverdDefault
    ip address 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0
    no ip address dhcp
    interface vlan 2
    ip address 10.0.2.1 255.255.255.0
    ip dhcp relay enable
    interface vlan 4
    ip address 10.0.4.1 255.255.255.0
    ip dhcp relay enable
    interface vlan 6
    ip address 10.0.6.1 255.255.255.0
    ip dhcp relay enable
    interface vlan 8
    ip address 10.0.8.1 255.255.255.0
    ip dhcp relay enable
    interface vlan 10
    ip address 10.0.10.1 255.255.255.0
    ip dhcp relay enable
    interface vlan 100
    name Network
    ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
    ip dhcp relay enable
    interface gigabitethernet1
    switchport mode access
    switchport access vlan 100
    interface gigabitethernet2
    switchport mode access
    switchport access vlan 100
    (all ports between are configured like ports 1 & 2)
    interface gigabitethernet49
    channel-group 1 mode on
    interface gigabitethernet50
    channel-group 1 mode on
    interface gigabitethernet51
    channel-group 1 mode on
    interface gigabitethernet52
    channel-group 1 mode on
    interface Port-channel1
    description CORELINK
    speed 1000
    no negotiation
    switchport trunk allowed vlan add 2,4,6,8,10
    switchport trunk native vlan 100
    ip default-gateway 10.0.0.254
    28 Port:
    vlan database
    vlan 2,4,6,8,10,100
    ip dhcp relay address 10.0.4.10
    ip dhcp relay address 10.0.4.14
    ip dhcp relay enable
    ip name-server  10.0.4.10 10.0.4.14
    hostname ACC-SW1
    ip ssh server
    ip ssh pubkey-auth
    snmp-server server
    snmp-server community public ro 10.0.4.5 view Default
    interface vlan 1
    Name ReserverdDefault
    no ip address dhcp
    interface vlan 2
    ip dhcp relay enable
    interface vlan 4
    ip dhcp relay enable
    interface vlan 6
    ip dhcp relay enable
    interface vlan 8
    ip dhcp relay enable
    interface vlan 10
    ip dhcp relay enable
    interface vlan 100
    name Network
    ip address 10.0.0.2 255.255.255.0
    ip dhcp relay enable
    interface gigabitethernet1
    switchport mode access
    switchport access vlan 100
    interface gigabitethernet2
    switchport mode access
    switchport access vlan 100
    (all ports between are configured like ports 1 & 2)
    interface gigabitethernet25
    channel-group 1 mode on
    interface gigabitethernet26
    channel-group 1 mode on
    interface gigabitethernet27
    channel-group 1 mode on
    interface gigabitethernet28
    channel-group 1 mode on
    interface Port-channel1
    description CORELINK
    speed 1000
    no negotiation
    switchport trunk allowed vlan add 2,4,6,8,10
    switchport trunk native vlan 100
    Thank you in advance for any assistance that you can provide, I have been tearing my hair out on this
    -Drew       

    The LAG is back up and working on native VLAN 100, but I am still not able to pass other vlan traffic from the L2 to L3 switch.  The switch also took out my switchport trunk native vlan 100 configs on both switches when they were connected.  After I manually put the configuration back the switches were able to communicate.  Here is the current port channel and LAG configurations:
    52:
    interface gigabitethernet51
    description "LAG 3"
    channel-group 1 mode on
    no macro auto smartport
    interface gigabitethernet52
    description "LAG 4"
    channel-group 1 mode on
    no macro auto smartport
    interface Port-channel1
    negotiation 1000f
    description CORELINK
    spanning-tree link-type point-to-point
    switchport trunk allowed vlan add 2,4,10,14
    switchport trunk native vlan 100
    macro description switch
    !next command is internal.
    macro auto smartport dynamic_type switch
    28:
    interface gigabitethernet27
    description "LAG 3"
    channel-group 1 mode on
    interface gigabitethernet28
    description "LAG 4"
    channel-group 1 mode on
    interface Port-channel1
    negotiation 1000f
    description CORELINK
    spanning-tree link-type point-to-point
    switchport trunk allowed vlan add 2,4,10,14
    switchport trunk native vlan 100
    macro description switch
    !next command is internal.
    macro auto smartport dynamic_type switch
    When I try to ping 10.0.4.1 from the 28 port, here is the output:
    Pinging 10.0.4.1 with 18 bytes of data:
    PING: net-unreachable
    PING: net-unreachable
    PING: net-unreachable
    PING: net-unreachable
    ----10.0.4.1 PING Statistics----
    4 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
    Thank you again for any assistance you can provide.
    -Drew

  • ASA5550 port channel configuration ERROR: nameif not allowed on empty etherchannel interface

    Hi All,
    I am having problem when configure port channel on asa5550 
    IOS ver asa914-k8.bin also in ver 9.02   and 8.47.
    Please let me know how can I solve this problem.
    UK-LON-FW(config)# int port-channel 3
    UK-LON-FW(config-if)# vlan 245
                           ^
    ERROR: % Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
    UK-LON-FW(config-if)# nameif secure
    ERROR: nameif not allowed on empty etherchannel interface.
    UK-LON-FW(config-if)#
    here is my interfaces configuration:
    interface GigabitEthernet0/0
    description fw1:G0/0 to uk-lon-gw1:e1/8 fw2:G0/0 to uk-lon-gw2:e1/9 outside zone
    channel-group 1 mode on
    no nameif
    no security-level
    no ip address
    interface GigabitEthernet0/1
    description fw1:G0/1 to uk-lon-gw2:e1/8 fw2:G0/1 to uk-lon-gw1:e1/9 outside zone
    channel-group 1 mode on
    no nameif
    no security-level
    no ip address
    interface GigabitEthernet0/2
    description fw1:G0/2 to uk-lon-sw1a:1 fw2:G0/2 to uk-lon-sw1a:2 dmz
    channel-group 2 mode on
    no nameif
    no security-level
    no ip address
    interface GigabitEthernet0/3
    description fw1:G0/3 to uk-lon-sw1b: fw2:G0/3 to uk-lon-sw1b:2 dmz
    channel-group 2 mode on
    no nameif   
    no security-level
    no ip address
    interface Management0/0
    management-only
    nameif management
    security-level 0
    ip address 10.10.51.18 255.255.254.0
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0
    description fw1:G1/0 to uk-lon-sw1a:3 fw2:G1/0 to uk-lon-sw1a:4 secure zone
    no nameif
    no security-level
    no ip address
    interface GigabitEthernet1/1
    description fw1:G1/1 to uk-lon-sw1b:3 fw2:G1/1 to uk-lon-sw1b:4 secure zone
    no nameif
    no security-level
    no ip address
    interface GigabitEthernet1/2
    description LAN Failover Interface
    no nameif   
    no security-level
    no ip address
    interface GigabitEthernet1/3
    description STATE Failover Interface
    no nameif
    no security-level
    no ip address
    interface Port-channel1
    description outside zone
    no nameif
    no security-level
    no ip address
    interface Port-channel1.5
    description outside zone Bundle FW:G0/0-G0/1 connect to GW1:e1/8-GW2:e1/8
    vlan 5
    nameif outside
    security-level 0
    ip address 216.239.105.5 255.255.255.128 standby 216.239.105.6
    interface Port-channel2
    description dmz Bunlde uk-lon-fw:G0/2-3 to sw1a:1-2 sw1b:1-2
    no nameif
    no security-level
    no ip address
    interface Port-channel2.105
    description dmz
    vlan 105
    nameif dmz
    security-level 50
    ip address 216.239.105.193 255.255.255.192 standby 216.239.105.194
    interface Port-channel3
    description secure zone Bunlde uk-lon-fw:G1/0-1 to sw1a:3-3 sw1b:3-4
    no nameif
    security-level 100
    ip address 10.254.105.1 255.255.255.0 standby 10.254.105.2
    UK-LON-FW(config-if)# 

    Hi Marvin,
    Thank you for your answer.  I did everything but it did not work. Turn out it is a bug ver 8.45 will let you created the sub logical interface but actually it did not work right.  Verson 9.x  doesn't let you create more than 2 port channel (limitation of ASA5550 hardware).
    https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCtq62715/?reffering_site=dumpcr 
    Also, you can see the 8.4 release notes were you can see that it is not supported:
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/asa84/release/notes/asarn84.html#pgfId-522232
    Interface Features
    EtherChannel support (ASA 5510 and higher)
    You can configure up to 48 802.3ad EtherChannels of eight active interfaces each.
    Note You cannot use interfaces on the 4GE SSM, including the integrated 4GE SSM in slot 1 on the ASA 5550, as part of an EtherChannel.
    We introduced the following commands: channel-group , lacp port-priority , interface port-channel , lacp max-bundle , port-channel min-bundle , port-channel load-balance , lacp system-priority , clear lacp counters , show lacp , show port-channel .

  • Catalyst 3750G and WLC 440x - Port Channel - Configuration - Best Pactice

    What is the best practice to use when configuring port channel between Catalystr 3750G switch stack and WLC 4402 / 4404 Wireless Lan Controllers:
    a) Negotiate to LACP
    b) Negotiate to PAgP
    or
    c) Hard-code to Port Channel without any negotiation.
    Any pointers to any useful links - much appreciated and configuration example as well.

    Answer is 'C'... channel-mode on
    Configuring Neighbor Devices to Support LAG
    The controller's neighbor devices must also be properly configured to support LAG.
    •Each neighbor port to which the controller is connected should be configured as follows:
    interface GigabitEthernet
    switchport
    channel-group mode on
    no shutdown
    •The port channel on the neighbor switch should be configured as follows:
    interface port-channel
    switchport
    switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
    switchport trunk native vlan
    switchport trunk allowed vlan
    switchport mode trunk
    no shutdown
    Here is a link that explains it. Hope this answers your question:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/controller/4.2/configuration/guide/c42mint.html#wp1116136
    Here is a Best Practice doc:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk722/tk809/technologies_tech_note09186a0080810880.shtml

  • How to find out that which port is configured with modem?

    Can some one please shed some light on this..

    try sending 'ATZ' to each port in turn until you get 'OK' back

  • How to configure a port channel with VLAN trunking (and make it work..)

    We're trying to configure a port channel group with trunked ports to connect a NetApp HA pair. We want to create two data LIFs and connect them to the switch stack.  We are trying to create 2 data lifs, one for cifs and one for nfs that are on different vlans.
    We want the same ports to be able to allow multiple vlans to communicate. (trunked)
    These data lifs should be able to fail over to different nodes in the HA pair and still be able to communicate on the network.
    What this means is that we have to connect 4 ports each for each node in the NetApp HA Pair to the switches and create a port channel of some type that allows for trunked vlans. When we configure the ports, the configuration is as follows (below):
    We are only able to configure an IP on one of the vlans.
    When we configure an IP from another vlan for the data lif, it does not respond to a ping.
    Does anyone have any idea what I'm doing wrong on the Cisco switch?
    interface GigabitEthernet4/0/12
    description Netapp2-e0a
    switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
    switchport trunk allowed vlan 10,20,511,519
    channel-protocol lacp
    channel-group 20 mode active
    end
    interface GigabitEthernet4/0/13
    description Netapp2-e0c
    switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
    switchport trunk allowed vlan 10,20,511,519
    channel-protocol lacp
    channel-group 20 mode active
    end
    interface GigabitEthernet6/0/12
    description Netapp2-e0b
    switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
    switchport trunk allowed vlan 10,20,511,519
    channel-protocol lacp
    channel-group 20 mode active
    end
    interface GigabitEthernet6/0/13
    description Netapp2-e0d
    switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
    switchport trunk allowed vlan 10,20,511,519
    channel-protocol lacp
    channel-group 20 mode active
    end
    interface Port-channel20
    description Netapp2-NFS
    switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
    switchport trunk allowed vlan 10,20,511,519
    spanning-tree portfast
    spanning-tree bpduguard enable
    end

    Our problem was fixed by the storage people.  They changed the server end to trunk, and the encapsulation / etherchannel.
    I like all the suggestions, and they probably helped out with the configuration getting this to work.
    Thanks!
    interface Port-channel20
    description Netapp2-NFS
    switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
    switchport trunk allowed vlan 10,20,511,519
    switchport mode trunk
    interface GigabitEthernet4/0/12
    switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
    switchport trunk allowed vlan 10,20,511,519
    switchport mode trunk
    channel-protocol lacp
    channel-group 20 mode active
    interface GigabitEthernet4/0/13
    switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
    switchport trunk allowed vlan 10,20,511,519
    switchport mode trunk
    channel-protocol lacp
    channel-group 20 mode active
    interface GigabitEthernet6/0/12
    switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
    switchport trunk allowed vlan 10,20,511,519
    switchport mode trunk
    channel-protocol lacp
    channel-group 20 mode active
    interface GigabitEthernet6/0/13
    switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
    switchport trunk allowed vlan 10,20,511,519
    switchport mode trunk
    channel-protocol lacp
    channel-group 20 mode active

  • Configuring port-channel on N7K

    Hi there,
    I am trying to build a port-channel from N7K-01 to N7K-02 using a breakout cables (40G interface from N7K-01 to 4x10G interfaces on N7K-02). it didn't work
    is this require a special configuration??? because I have done port-channel configuration between two 40G interfaces and it works.
    appreciate your valuable support if possible to share the needed configuration to accomplish this.
    thanks,
    regards,
    Haitham.

    Hi,
    when I do it directly between cisco ASR9k, the 10g interfaces are up with lights but 40G side is red not up.
    between cisco N7Ks, no lights from both sides. between N7Ks cable is going to patch-panel and then to other nexus.
    thanks,

  • Do I configure spanning-tree port type ed trunk on LACP port-channels

    Hello,
    Can't seem to see a clear answer and wondering if something could offer some advice please?
    We are using LACP aggregation across all our 10 gig attached servers and also trunking them.  We're running a VPC pair of 5596 Nexus.
    For a standard trunk port I always add the spanning-tree port type edge trunk to the interface config.
    However I think I should be adding this to the overiding port-channel config.  At present a colleague has configured the VPC below omitting the spanning-tree port type config.
    interface port-channel100
      description a-server
      switchport mode trunk
      switchport trunk allowed vlan 100
      vpc 100
    The port member configs are these which do contain the spanning tree port type:
    interface Ethernet1/1
      description a-server(1)
      switchport mode trunk
      switchport trunk allowed vlan 100
      spanning-tree port type edge trunk
      channel-group 100 mode active
    I always try to keep the overiding port channel config the same as its members and obviously for most config, you can't have disparate configs anyway.
    However for the spanning tree config the NexOS allows you to have the members with spanning tree port types and not have to reflect that in the port-channel.
    However I have this issue with STP:
    Switch1# show spanning-tree interface po100
    Vlan             Role Sts Cost      Prio.Nbr Type
    VLAN0100         Desg BKN*200       128.4996 (vPC) Network P2p *BA_Inc
    Is this due to the inconsistency with my port channel to member configs?
    Any advice would be gratefully accepted.
    Thanks!

    Hi Paul, there are some parameters you can define on individual ports and there are some of them that will be inherited from the port-channel configuration no matter what has been configured under the infidividual ports. Spanning-tree configuration is one of the inherited ones. As soon as the port joins into a port-channel, it will start to use spanning-tree settings under the port-channel. When it leaves the channel, then it can continue to use the individual configuration.
    There is a nice summary here under NX-OS Interface Conf Guide > Port-Channel Conf:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/datacenter/sw/6_x/nx-os/interfaces/configuration/guide/if_portchannel.html#wp1798338
    Evren

  • Possible to use inline mode with Port Channel

    Hi,
    Just wondering if anyone has used inline mode with Port Channel configuration placing WAE device between router and switch. Any tips or gotcahs to be concerned about. We currently have inline mode running at this location but site would want redudancy built in through port channel.
    kind regards,
    Nigel

    Hi Nigel,
    This is not supported :
    Taken from here :
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/app_ntwk_services/waas/waas/v531/command/reference/cmdr/glob_cfg.html#wp1532575
    Best regards
    Finn Poulsen

Maybe you are looking for

  • Client does not have permission to send as this sender

    We have a CRM web application hosted on a server. When a user launches the site, the site provides facility to the customer to send the query into the system using the email. The website provides the filed for the customer to enter customer’s email I

  • IPad 2 will not turn on after Update 6.1

    I've read a number of discussions on the issue, but have yet to find a solution. I am using an iPad 2 (version A1395). I tried updating to iOS 6.1 over WiFi. It seemed to download well enough, but when it got to the installation, it kind of fried my

  • IPDS install error on a port other than 389

    Hi I need to install iPDS on a port other than 389. During installation, when I give a different port and try to install, during the post-installation phase, I get error that the configuration information could not be updated and installation fails.

  • Asset value date in Internal order settlement ko88

    Hi. I have posted some expenses to the internal order. I m trying to settle it to AUC with tcode KO88. In the selection screen of ko88 i gave asset value date as 15.07.2011 but system is posting with month end date only as 31.07.2011. I read the sap

  • Is it possible to only submit/email a one page form embedded in a large document?

    Hello. I have a catalogue with numerous product enquiry forms embedded (designed in ID CS6). When one submits an enquiry form, the entire massive pdf is put into an email for sending. Is it possible to define that only the form page is emailed? Thank