Port created in Idx1 not reflecting in WE19 (R3 side)

Hii Gurus,
when im doing idoc to file scenario., i have to release the idoc from r3, for that im using tcode we19 testing tool. But the problem is the created receiver port (The port created in IDX1 in pi side) not reflecting R3. I mean I am getting error like " "PORT RFC800 DOESNT EXIT IN THE THE TABLE OF PORT DISCRIPTIONS" when i try to do outbound processing.
RFC800 is the port name which i have created in IDX1 and i have already added the metadata to that port using idx2 tcode.
please help experts,
Regards,
Balaji
Edited by: Balaji Pichaimuthu on Jul 26, 2009 7:43 AM
Edited by: Balaji Pichaimuthu on Jul 26, 2009 7:45 AM

Here is my steps,
In R3 system:
1. RFC destination which points the PI with name is PICLNT001.
2. In we21 . created port (PORT800) in this i gave the RFC destination as PICLNT001.
3. WE20 - Partner Profile -- gave the Logical System name of SAP (APOCLNT800) with type LS.
    in outbound parameter
    Gave the Port name as PORT800 (Which i created in R3).. and gave the message type and Basic type..
    and click the Option "Transfer Immediate"
4.IN BD64 created the distribution model.. and gave source and destination logical systems and message type..
after that goto Environment---> Generate partner profile.. In that gave the Receiver Logical system and model view name.
In PI System.
1. RFC destination which points the R3 , name E63CLNT800.
2 .IDX1 , creating a port name ( RFC800 ) and specify the RFC destination (E63CLNT800),
     Logical system is PICLNT001( PI ). and Client is 001.
    (Note: i had used this port when i done file to idoc scenario.. it was worked fine)
Now the problem
In we19 trying to release a port
in Control Record
Receiver side
port               :RFC800
partner NO   :PICLNT001
part. type     :LS
Sender side
Port              : PORT800
partner NO   :APOCLNT800
part. type     :LS
message type cremas04.
outbound processing
The same error : "PORT RFC800 DOESNT EXIT IN THE THE TABLE OF PORT DISCRIPTIONS"
Did i missing something here?
Please help me.
Regards,
Balaji
Edited by: Balaji Pichaimuthu on Jul 26, 2009 12:04 PM

Similar Messages

Objects created/changes are not reflecting in QA?

Hello All
Already having a Process chain in production which is loading to a cube.Now I made some modifications(Like added 3 infopckages to the existing 5 infopackages,totally 8 infopackages) to that Process Chain in DEV and transported to QA.
In QA if I noticed I can view the new Infopackages which are created/added in Infopackages i.e,in <b>Infosource tab</b> but not in Process chain?and also I can view the old infopackages in process chain in QA?
What will be the problem.Can anyone pl let me know what should I do in order to get this new infopackages in the process chain?
Many Thanks
balaji

hi AHP
thanks for your reply.
Where to check the transport request? is it in SE09?
and in your statements what do u mean by "<b>process chain as starting point</b>" what do u mean by starting point of a process chain?
Many Thanks
balaji

Packages created in the schema are not reflecting in the schema

Dear All,
Please help me regarding the following strange issue:
I am creating a package in my schema and it is not reflecting in any of the user_objects/all_objects views.
Please advice.
Thanks in advance.
Rollerz

If you create any Package, you can select this Package in user_objects.
Try like this
Select * from user_objects where object_type = 'PACKAGE'
you will see all Packages in your Schema
Regards
Arni

Bank account number not reflecting while creating invoice some parties

Hi All,
We are facing following issue while creating invoice's for some particular parties.
Bank account number is not reflecting while creating invoice at invoice work bench from front end. Bank account details are properly attached at party site level.
Kindly guide us regarding this.
Thanks,

Hi Team,
If you are getting XXXX in place of Bank number then the issue is at (Setup > Payment >Payment Adminstrator).
Log into Payments Setup > Shared Setup > System Security Options. Now you will find "External Bank Account Masking Setting" & Number of Digits to Disp . Now provide the numer of digits to display.
Thanks
Vinod K

802.1x accounting does not reflect correct port status

Hi,
I've just discovered an issue when trying to use MSFT supplicant and Cisco 802.1x accounting. This makes 802.1x accounting completely unusable.
Facts:
1. MSFT supplicant does not send EAPOL-Logoff messages and there's no way to enable this (btw. Aegis client does not send it either, except when disabling interface).
2. I am doing machine authentication along with domain authentication.
3. Windows XP SP2 is used with EAP registry hacks applied.
4. PEAP/MS-CHAPv2 method is used.
Now when the computer is started it is logged into 802.1x with 'host/machine' account and RADIUS accounting start is sent by the switch. That's fine.
When a user logs on with its 'domain\user' identity, then EAPOL-Start is sent from the host triggering new EAP message exchange and the user is authenticated correctly. However the switch sends Interim Accounting still using 'host/machine' credentials which is obviously wrong.
Even more bizarre accounting happens when the user subsequently logs off from the machine. The EAPOL-Start is sent from the host triggering new authentication process for 'host/machine' identity and the host is authenticated ok. The accounting being sent is:
- first Accounting Stop for 'host/machine' User-Name
- then strange Interim Accounting with most attributes empty or missing
256970: Jul 10 15:56:41.211 MET-DST: RADIUS: authenticator 68 CA 1A 46 85 4F F5 95 - 87 B4 84 61 72 85 42 F3
256971: Jul 10 15:56:41.211 MET-DST: RADIUS: Acct-Session-Id [44] 10 "013F0000"
256972: Jul 10 15:56:41.211 MET-DST: RADIUS: Vendor, Cisco [26] 34
256973: Jul 10 15:56:41.211 MET-DST: RADIUS: Cisco AVpair [1] 28 "connect-progress=Auth Open"
256974: Jul 10 15:56:41.211 MET-DST: RADIUS: Acct-Session-Time [46] 6 0
256975: Jul 10 15:56:41.211 MET-DST: RADIUS: Acct-Input-Octets [42] 6 0
256976: Jul 10 15:56:41.211 MET-DST: RADIUS: Acct-Output-Octets [43] 6 0
256977: Jul 10 15:56:41.211 MET-DST: RADIUS: Acct-Input-Packets [47] 6 0
256978: Jul 10 15:56:41.211 MET-DST: RADIUS: Acct-Output-Packets [48] 6 0
256979: Jul 10 15:56:41.211 MET-DST: RADIUS: Acct-Authentic [45] 6 RADIUS [1]
256980: Jul 10 15:56:41.211 MET-DST: RADIUS: Acct-Status-Type [40] 6 Watchdog [3]
256981: Jul 10 15:56:41.211 MET-DST: RADIUS: Vendor, Cisco [26] 24
256982: Jul 10 15:56:41.211 MET-DST: RADIUS: cisco-nas-port [2] 18 "FastEthernet0/11"
256983: Jul 10 15:56:41.211 MET-DST: RADIUS: NAS-Port [5] 6 50011
256984: Jul 10 15:56:41.211 MET-DST: RADIUS: NAS-Port-Type [61] 6 Eth [15]
256985: Jul 10 15:56:41.211 MET-DST: RADIUS: Class [25] 27
256986: Jul 10 15:56:41.215 MET-DST: RADIUS: 43 41 43 53 3A 30 2F 32 39 32 66 2F 61 38 31 38 [CACS:0/292f/a818]
256987: Jul 10 15:56:41.215 MET-DST: RADIUS: 30 32 38 2F 35 30 30 31 31 [028/50011]
256988: Jul 10 15:56:41.215 MET-DST: RADIUS: Service-Type [6] 6 Framed [2]
256989: Jul 10 15:56:41.215 MET-DST: RADIUS: NAS-IP-Address [4] 6 10.129.128.40
256990: Jul 10 15:56:41.215 MET-DST: RADIUS: Acct-Delay-Time [41] 6 0
256991: Jul 10 15:56:41.239 MET-DST: RADIUS: Received from id 1646/238 10.129.128.38:1813, Accounting-response, len 20
256992: Jul 10 15:56:41.239 MET-DST: RADIUS: authenticator ED 8E 8B 15 28 5F E4 37 - BF A8 F5 9E 10 43 5E A8
So that the accounting sent from the switch does not reflect current status of the authenticated user on a given port.
How to deal with this issue? Any ideas?
thanks,
robert

Does your radius proxy-table is populated wrong for EAP- SIM users ?

I have created a user in oracle BPM but it is not reflected in system-jazn-data.xml file and I am unable to authenticate that user to create context as needed in workflow client

I have created a user in oracle BPM but it is not reflected in system-jazn-data.xml file and I am unable to authenticate that user to create context as needed in workflow client

weblogic credentials are different.
and using thode credentials I am able to login to weblogic server
the users I am talking about is the process users defined in realm.
in realm those users are defined as Default authenticator and OID authenticator.
and I am trying to authenticate one of those users defined in realm using java api so that I an access a process defined In Oracle BPM 11g

Local formula created in web analyzer not reflected in bex analyzer.

Hello all,
I had created a Local formula in the web analyzer and saved the query as a view. Now, when I open the same view in
bex analyzer then I cannot find the local formula column; i.e. it is not reflected in the bex analyzer.
Is this an error or this is not possible?
Thanks in advance,
Sandy.

Hello Sandy,
If you create the formulo at the web analyzer you will not be able to see it at the bex analyzer. Only if you create at the query designer, so you will be able to see it at the web and bex analyzer.
Thanks,
Diego Ferrary

Data type change made to schema.xml of comments list which is part of blog site template is not reflecting in the existing site but working fine when new site is created.

Hi,
I have created a blog site with the available site template few days back. Now we have the requirement of having the attachments in the body of the comments section.
So, I updated the schema.xml of the comments list available under ../templates/blog/lists/comments/schema.xml to have rich text for the Body field.
With this change, I created a new site and it was working fine. Change is reflected in the new blog site.
However, this particular change is not reflected in the existing blog site. Any changes made to the schema.xml is not effecting the old blog site.
Can anyone suggest what can be done for the change to be reflected in the old blog site?
Thanks in Advance,
Regards, Keerthi Suryadevara

Hi,
According to your post, my understanding is that you wanted to add attachments in the body of the comments section.
You can add the the Code inside the Default list pages. For more information, you can refer to:
Enable Attachment in SharePoint Blog post list and display the list Attachments
In addition, you can add an enhanced rich text field to the comment list and remove the body field. Then you can insert files into comments, too.
Here is a similar thread for your reference:
http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/77194/how-to-add-attachments-for-comments-list-in-sharepoint-blog-2010
Best Regards,
Linda Li
Linda Li
TechNet Community Support

Excise rates not reflecting in PO based on values entered in newly created condition table in TAXINN.

Dear SAP Gurus,
I have created a new condition table using t.code m/03 by taking a copy of existing standard condition table. I have assigned the newly created condition table to access sequence. After assignment of condition table i have entered the relevant excise rates in excise condition types using the newly created key combination through t.code FV12. When i enter the Tax Code in PO, excise duty rates are not reflecting in PO. When i am entering the excise rates in any other standard key combination, excise rates are reflecting in PO.
Following are the fields in newly created key combination (Condition Table)
1) Country
2) Plant
3) Control Code
4) Tax Code
Kindly help me in resolving the issue.
Regards,
Vinay

HI,
Check whether you have maintained the rates for the new tax code in FV11 also whether you have assigned the tax code to the company code ?
Compare the tax code which is working in PO with the one which is not & find out if there is any difference.
If you want to post the tax values to the new G/L in OB40 then maintain the same settings for the tax code which is working in PO.
Thanks & Regards,

Message sent from RWB but not reflected in SXMB_MONI

Hello Experts,
I have a SOAP - RFC synchronous scenario. I am sending a message from RWB to PI system.It shows message sent in RWB and the message details are reflected in the RWB->message monitoring ->Adapter Engine as 'Successfull'. But no in RWB->message monitoring->Integration Engine.
The message does not reflect in SXMB_MONI either. All other scenarios are working fine except this.
Also on checking the status of Sender communication channels in RWB it shows 'yellow' with reason channel may be inactive or unitialised. Whereas i have checked the communiaction channels in ID, their status is Active.
Kindly advice a solution.
Thanks in advance,
Elizabeth.

Hi,
Your message processed from sender adapter. But seems there is some problem in reaching IE. Check out your wsdl file. check when define a web service, have u given right url. Is it like this
http://[server]:[port]/XISOAPAdapter/MessageServlet?channel=:[sender communication channel service]:[sender communication channel name]
and also make sure whether you given the right http port name, sender business system name , sender message interface in the following step of define web service. and the port name is important you can fine http port for your PI server by going to SMICM tcode. in that press shift + F1
You altova xmlspy software for testing purpose. You can download free 30 day trial version from altova website. once you installed in it.
Go to xmlspy software. the menu you can find a "SOAP". underthis menu you can find create soap request. select that it will ask the wsdl file. give the wsdl file which you are created in define web service step. after that in xmlspy
menu->soap->send request to server. then it ill ask user name and password to connect with the PI server. then you will get the rfc response if u successfully connected with PI sever.
for more details,
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/weblogs;jsessionid=(J2EE3417200)ID1437447550DB12110496670821140257End?blog=/pub/wlg/4550
but in this website they didnt use xmlspy some other third party software. good luck
Regards,
Balaji

Free goods not reflecting in PO from Info Record

Hi,
My requirement is , when ever i order 100 qty from a vendor 10 qty should be delivered free of cost.
I am trying to maintain Info record for the same..
Now when i created PO for the same...I entered 100 qty..it is not reflecting 10 qty in another line in PO..
Where i am wrong?
Uts

HI,
Have maintained the values in
*Spro-Purchasing-Discount in kind-Define & assign discount in kind schema-Maintain free goods schema*
It will be available in standard SAP if not do the following configuration
Here
Usage -N
Application -M
create procedure NR0001
In control data
step-10
Cond Type-NR00
Then save.
Next
Define free good schema
Here assign ur schema grp of vendor
Then assign the procedure created previously (i-e) NR001 & THEN SAVE.
The above configuration is very important for the free goods scenario to work.
Then go to MM and in purchasing view and give the value 2.
Then in MBN1 create the condition record for the IR -0.
Then create the PO it will work definetly.
9884057038
murugan
Edited by: Murugan mgl on Jun 17, 2009 6:58 AM
Edited by: Murugan mgl on Jun 17, 2009 6:59 AM

ER Contribution for Pension not Reflecting in Payroll.

Hi Experts,
I have an issue in Pension ER contribution in Payroll.
We have created a function to calculate the ER contribution and incorporated in Schema (INT). while running the payroll
ER contribution is not reflecting Payroll.
Note: We are passing the calculated result to WT0902 Pension ER contribution in RT directly by referring structure PC207.
Correct me if this is the rite approach.
Regards
Raj

Hi,
Insted of going through SCHEMA please configure this table in simple way and check whether your client need is getting fullfilled if it is for indian payroll.
V_T7INF1,V_T7INF5,V_T7INF5,V_T7INF3
Go to pa30 and choose infotype 0587 and fill the details and for pension you can either give percentage or the fixed amount and run the payroll
Thanks
Vibin

2LIS_02_ITM deleted line items are not reflected in BW

Hi,
Our current Data flow 2LIS_02_ITM-->DSO-->CUBE.
I am analyzing a Invoice, When it is created 01.04.2014 it has got 10 Line Items and all the data is load to BW,Invoice with 10 Line items.
In ECC I can now see the same Invoice only got 5 line items and from change log I can see 5 line items are deleted on 15.04.2014.These changes are not reflected in BW.In BW invoice data still shows 10 line items.
If I perform setup table job and ECC RSA3 for that invoice I am getting only 5.
I believe it’s something to do with 0RECORDMODE,Can you please let me know how to fix this in BW.
Thanks

Yes this is a known behavior in case of deltas.
For Deleted line items Rocancel field will have an entry with R.
To handle this you need to map ROCANCEL field in Technical group of transformation (Between Datasource to DSO) with 0Recordmode.
Once you will do that then after activating the data in DSO it will nullify the records and deleted order or item will not appear.
Regards,
AL

Credit check not reflecting in sales order level

Hi,Experts,
I have configured a dynamic credit check,but even if the credit limit for the customer is crossed,still it is not reflecting in the sales document level,and allows me to create the sales order.please guide me as where should I check the error in the system,
Thanks in advance,
A.Chakraborty

yes it is active for order type,and active for item category,as well as the dynamic credit check setting that is the combination of
risk categoryccaccgrp(for sales order) ,is also done,still when the sales order is created,and even though the credit limit has crossed it is not throwing any message ,which is supposed to appear in the sales order,when we are going to save...
please revert bach to me,to guide me about any further areas i need to explore within the particular area so far as the setting is concerned.
Many thanks,
Anshuman

Tree table is not reflecting the updated model data changes at the front end

I have two tables ,
1) Provider table(tree table) 2)member table
I have implemented drag and drop functionality using jQuery UI on both tables.
In my scenario when I drag a member from the member table and drop it on the Provider table and also when I delete an assigned member from the provider table I will update the data fetched from odata model and again I will call the method which binds the data to the provider table so that the table will reflect the changes.
here is the code,
on drop:
$("#Provider tbody tr").droppable({
drop: function(event){
oController.AssignMember(oProviderId, oMemberId)
}).disableSelection();
Assign member function: here am updating the model.
AssignMember : function(oProviderId, oMemberId){
var oModel = new sap.ui.model.odata.ODataModel("../../../services/provider.xsodata/", true);
var oParameters = {};
oParameters.PROVIDER_ID = oProviderId;
oParameters.MEMBER_ID = oMemberId;
oParameters.CREATED_ON = new Date();
oModel.setHeaders({"content-type" : "application/json;charset=utf-8"});
oModel.create( "/PROVIDERMEMBERS", oParameters, null, function() {
var oController = sap.ui.controller("adsm.provider.member_assignment_view");
oController.GetProviderData();
},function(jqXHR) {
var errorMessage = jqXHR.response.body;
var jsondata = JSON.parse(errorMessage);
sap.ui.commons.MessageBox.alert(jsondata.error.message.value);
GetProviderData function: here i bind the data to the table
GetProviderData: function(){
var oModel = new sap.ui.model.odata.ODataModel("../../../services/provider.xsodata/", true);
var Context = "/PROVIDERS?expand=ASSIGNEDMEMBERS&$select=NAME,ID,ASSIGNEDMEMBERS/NAME,ASSIGNEDMEMBERS/ID,ASSIGNEDMEMBERS/PROVIDER_ID";
var oTable = sap.ui.getCore().byId("tblProviders");
oModel.read(Context, null, null, true, onSuccess, onError);
function onSuccess(oEventdata){
var outputJson = {};
var p = 0;
var r = {};
if (oEventdata) {
r = oEventdata;
try {
if (oEventdata.d){
r = oEventdata.d;
} catch(e){
//alert('oEventdata.d failed');
try {
if (oEventdata.d.results){
r = oEventdata.d.results;
} catch(e){
//alert('oEventdata.d.results failed');
try {
if (oEventdata.results){
r = oEventdata.results;
} catch(e){
//alert('oEventdata.results failed');
$.each(r, function(i, j) {
outputJson[p] = {};
outputJson[p]["NAME"] = j.NAME;
outputJson[p]["ID"] = j.ID;
outputJson[p]["PROVIDER_ID"] = j.ID;
outputJson[p]["DELETE"] = 0;
var m = 0;
if (j.ASSIGNEDMEMBERS.results.length > 0) {
$.each(j.ASSIGNEDMEMBERS.results, function(a,b) {
outputJson[p][m] = { NAME: b.NAME,
ID : b.ID,
PROVIDER_ID: b.PROVIDER_ID,
DELETE: 1};
m++;
p++;
var oModel = new sap.ui.model.json.JSONModel();
oModel.setData(outputJson);
oTable.setModel(oModel);
function onError(oEvent){
console.log("Error on Provider Members");
oTable.bindRows({
path:"/"
Its working fine in chrome but in IE the model data gets updated but the table is not reflecting the changes at front end.Can anyone suggest me a possible solution to fix this?
Please have a look at the attached screen shots.
Best regards,
Amala Suganya.

Hi Amala,
I think this will help you:
Disabling Cache for CRUD/FI OData scenarios for a UI5 Application on Internet Explorer
Kind regards,
RW

Port created in Idx1 not reflecting in WE19 (R3 side)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for