Port Forwarding Rule Added Via UPnP

14:24:13, 27 May.
(2110048.260000) Port forwarding rule added via UPnP. protocol: UDP, external ports: any->57902, internal ports: 57902, internal client: 192.168.1.65
14:23:34, 27 May.
(2110008.940000) Port forwarding rule added via UPnP. protocol: UDP, external ports: any->57902, internal ports: 57902, internal client: 192.168.1.65
14:22:53, 27 May.
(2109967.800000) Port forwarding rule added via UPnP. protocol: UDP, external ports: any->57902, internal ports: 57902, internal client: 192.168.1.65
14:22:10, 27 May.
(2109925.160000) Port forwarding rule added via UPnP. protocol: UDP, external ports: any->57902, internal ports: 57902, internal client: 192.168.1.65
14:21:37, 27 May.
(2109892.130000) Port forwarding rule added via UPnP. protocol: UDP, external ports: any->57902, internal ports: 57902, internal client: 192.168.1.65
14:21:06, 27 May.
(2109861.170000) Port forwarding rule added via UPnP. protocol: UDP, external ports: any->57902, internal ports: 57902, internal client: 192.168.1.65
14:20:26, 27 May.
(2109820.740000) Port forwarding rule added via UPnP. protocol: UDP, external ports: any->57902, internal ports: 57902, internal client: 192.168.1.65
Hi guys, would anyone be able to tell me what the above messages in my HH3's log mean? My connection has been fine but I would like to know why this is happening every few seconds.
At first I thought it was because of a certain program I was using but it happens even when this program isn't running so I just don't know!! Any help is appreciated.
EDIT: So I'm guessing it's something to do with having UPnP turned on. The reason I'm asking is because I've seen other people's logs and they aren't filled with this message.

Thanks, TommyBobbins.
I will turn off UPnP and see what happens.
I checked the logs again my computer has a lease of 192.168.1.64 - this IP address is also showing the same error in the logs. I suspect the other IP address, ending in 65 is my Dad's computer. He uses Windows and I use Mac.
I'll keep you posted.
EDIT: Just turned off UPnP and that was OK. I checked a program called uTorrent and it says the incoming TCP port (54488) is working.....I find this strange as I have portforwarding turned off... :s
Any ideas?
EDIT AGAIN:
Just wanted to add this in:
18:54:38, 27 May.
(2126273.250000) Port forwarding rule added via UPnP. protocol: UDP, external ports: any->52503, internal ports: 52503, internal client: 192.168.1.65
18:53:53, 27 May.
(2126228.130000) Port forwarding rule added via UPnP. protocol: UDP, external ports: any->52503, internal ports: 52503, internal client: 192.168.1.65
18:53:20, 27 May.
(2126194.690000) Port forwarding rule added via UPnP. protocol: UDP, external ports: any->52503, internal ports: 52503, internal client: 192.168.1.65
20:34:34, 27 May.
(2132268.320000) Port forwarding rule added via UPnP. protocol: UDP, external ports: any->54488, internal ports: 54488, internal client: 192.168.1.64
20:34:31, 27 May.
(2132266.240000) Port forwarding rule deleted via UPnP. protocol: UDP, external ports: any->54488, internal ports: 54488, internal client: 192.168.1.64
20:34:29, 27 May.
(2132264.190000) Port forwarding rule added via UPnP. protocol: TCP, external ports: any->54488, internal ports: 54488, internal client: 192.168.1.64
20:34:27, 27 May.
(2132262.050000) Port forwarding rule deleted via UPnP. protocol: TCP, external ports: any->54488, internal ports: 54488, internal client: 192.168.1.64
As you can see it happens on different ports and UDP and TCP ports....
Hasn't happened in the 20mins or so I've had UPnP turned off. Still, I am curious as to what causes this.

Similar Messages

Port Forwarding Rules

I had to do a factory reset on my MI424WR router while trying to get a security DVR accessable from the outside. I noticed that I have far fewer port forwarding rules now than before the reset. Does anyone have a list of rules I "should" have. Or maybe a config file I can load?
The issues now are that I lose connectivity with the net after the router runs for a couple hours. I also lose the ability to log into the router. Resetting the router clears it for a while, but then it dies again.

The rules that should be in the router should be applied by Verizon or added by the router automatically as time goes on. For your case, just re-create your rules and see if anything breaks.
For the router deal, consider disabling services like UPnP, the IGMP gateway, and the Firewall so the router runs in simplest form. Alternatively, see if you can narrow down the disconnects down to a specific device or with bad Coax if you have a coax connection back to the ONT. Failing that, consider asking for a new router from Verizon.
========
The first to bring me 1Gbps Fiber for $30/m wins!

Lync Edge and Proxy server public DNS records port forwarding rules

Hi All
I have question in regards to port forwarding rules for port 443 of simple url.
I have 4 public ip addresses.
1 edge server (4 nics , 3 running with different ip for sip, meet and dialin in DMZ network, 1 connected to internal local network).
1 proxy server (2 nics, 1 running with an ip which is in DMZ same as edge, and 1 connected to internal local network)
1 front end (lync 2013 standard installed.) connected to internal local network
1 office web apps . connected to internal local network
The question is that I am using 3 public ip addresses respectively on public DNS records for sip, meet and dialin(av) and using port 443 which has been set on edge server. So , I can use 3 DMZ network ip address on edge for sip, meet
and dialin (av) port forwarding from 3 public ip addresses as per in Microsoft document.
However, I also have a reverse proxy .Hence, my understanding is all public DNS records except SIP and port 443 should be pointed and port forwarded to reverse proxy ip address which is in DMZ network as it would redirect 443 and 80 to 4443 and 8080 to front
end.
Now the question has been clear, if simple URLs public DNS record and port forwarding rules for port 443 should be pointed to reverse proxy server, why they need to be set on each ip address and port number in Front end server topology to edge server?
If anyone knows, please give a help how to set it correct and what is supposed to be a correct configuration for a topology lync 2013

Hi George
Thanks for your reply. Attached is my topology which could make my it bit clear. You may see the public dns host record from the image. I set sip, meet, dialin , and owa 4 host records. The first 3 records are pointed to lync edge by doing a NAT with port
443 which is the same as per you said. However my understanding is they should be pointed to reverse proxy instead as for instance, I need meet.xxx.com with port 443 to be redirected to port 4443 through reverse proxy server to the front end. So when the external
customers who do not have lync client installed to their machine then we can shoot a lync meeting and send to them via outlook and they just need to click on join lync meeting link in the email to join in such a meeting based on IE. (Is my understanding correct?)
If lync web meeting works like so , then the question is why I need to set three SAME addresses in front end topology builder for edge and make them point to edge server instead?　
１. Access Edge service (SIP.XXX.COM) ---> I understand that it is used for external login lync front end.
2. Webconf edge server(Can I set to meet.xxx.com which is the same as simple URL that points to reverse proxy?) ----> If I can set this address to be the same as simple url address that points to reverse proxy, why should it need to be NATed to edge
instead? TO BE HONEST, if I HAVE tested, if I set this url as sip.xxx.com which means to use a single FQDN and ip address with port 444 and points simple url meet.xxx.com to reverse proxy, it will still work to join lync meeting sent by
outlook.I DO NOT REALLY UNDERSTAND WHAT this URL used for at this stage.
3. AV edge --- same as webconf
Regards
Wen Fei Cao

Two web servers cant use same port forwarding rule???

I have two web servers, each configured to respond to http reqests on port 80. I use NoIP service to map a domain name to my router. I create a port forwarding assignment for Server A by selecting the WebServer rule in the port forwarding rule table. All is fine. For Server B, I select the same Webserver rule and the router says there is a conflict.
I don't understand why. I think the router has enough information to route a http request for Server B by knowing its MAC address, which is different than Server A MAC address.
What am I missing here???
I was able to do this on my previous router with DD-WRT.....
So it would appear the way to resolve this is to assign a different port address to Server B???
grrrrrrrrrr I hate this router

You shouldn't have been able to do that on any router. You have to change the listening port of server 2, to 8080 or something like that, or make one a secure server and run it over 443
That is a known issue with port forwarding
Problem #8:
Same Port in Multiple Rules
There are some routers such as Linksys, D-Link and many others that do not do any checks if a port is already in another port forwarding rule. A port can only be forwarded to one Computer/IP at a time. So when there are multiples of the same port number the port forwarding rule will not work.
Here is an example.
As you can see port 2350 is in 2 rules. The 1st one points to a different IP than that of the 2nd rule. So the router will honor the 1st rule and the 2nd port forwarding rule to port 2350 fails.
By removing the 1st rule the 2nd one will now work.

Publish the port forwarding rules and req. for customers to use the FiOS TV features they pay for!

Please read this thread and vote.
http://forums.verizon.com/t5/Share-Your-Ideas-with-Verizon/Publish-the-port-forwarding-rules-and-req...

Here they are, but - yes it would be great if Verizon published these, or at the very least linked to Actiontec's Website, where they publish the rules as well. or at least sticky some of these instructions here in the forums.
Instructional Video's and step by step detailed instructions for port forwarding
How to enable BASIC Port Forwarding on the MI424WR Verizon FiOS Router (actiontec.com)
How to Configure Advanced Port Forwarding on the MI424WR Verizon FiOS Router  (actiontec.com)
PCWintech's guide to portforwarding for the actiontec MI424WR (Verizon Firmware)
PCWintech's guide to portforwarding for the Westell 327w DSL Modem
PortForward.com
I put my vote in.
EDIT: I Didn't realize you were asking for the port forwarding rules to the features, I should have read better. But yes I agree with that too.

RV180W loses port forwarding rules when switching WAN connections

We have a backup WAN connection in our office, but we switch this connection manually on our RV180W when the primary goes down. Our normal connection is ADSL with PPPoE, and the backup is Cable with DHCP.
However, we also have some port forwarding rules for our VoIP PBX (UDP port 5060) as well as SSH, and these rules seem to stop working completely when we switch our WAN connection to our cable connection. We can still surf the web from our workstations, but our incoming phone calls and SSH connections all cease to work completely. The problem does not persist after we've switched back to our normal ADSL connection.
This behaviour is completely bizarre and suggests that there's some kind of bug in the Cisco RV180W.

helm,
I'm sorry, I wasn't clear which IP address renewal I am speaking about.
I believe that the problem is caused when the router renews the WHS's local IP address (192.168...). My WAN IP address remains unchanged througout the tests I performed and the problems I experienced.
The very act of changing the local clients' lease time in the router's configuration causes the forwarding to be lost immediately. (I am gusessing that when the lease time is changed, the router immediately renews the lease and begins a new countdown.)
(In fact, I might go as far as to say it is a bug in the firmware, but I haven't done enough testing to nail it down.)

Maximum port forwarding rules in RVS4000 ?

Hello,
I'm wondering if there is a maximum number of port forwarding rule in the RVS4000.
I can't find this information in the specs.
Thanks in advance.

great. so the better question is WHY is there a maxium? i need to set up many rules in my SMALL BUSINESS environment. this stupid sh!t is costing me A LOT OF MONEY

Weird conflicts adding port forwarding rules

I've just joined BT and I'm trying to add the portforwarding rules I need and had on my previous router (Thompson 585v7).
I created a ruleset named "eMule (38297)" forwarding TCP 38297 and UDP 16318.
When I go to assign it, I select the rule then my PC and it changes the name to "BT HomeSafe CameraeMule (38297)" and when I click Add it just shows it as "BT HomeSafe Camera". So I checked this rule by going to Add User Defined and selecting Copy an existing rule and then BT HomeSafe Camera and it shows that this is forwarding TCP/UDP 1024 which doesn't conflict with my eMule rule whatsoever.
I have the same problem with a rule to forward TCP/UDP 3071-3072, which the Hub mixes up with PalTalk, which forwards 2090-2091 and 2095 and a rule to forward TCP/UDP 52616 which it mixes up with Rainbow Six, which forwards TCP/UDP 2346. In fact, pretty much any ruleset I've created has this problem when I go to assign it.
So basically it's a big old mess and I wonder if anyone knows how to fix it
Solved!
Go to Solution.

This page may help to sort out your problem.
Port forwarding problems
You need to give your devices static IP addresses, and port forward to the IP address, not the device name.
You should be able to copy an existing assignment, but remember to rename the new application first.
There are some useful help pages here, for BT Broadband customers only, on my personal website.
BT Broadband customers - help with broadband, WiFi, networking, e-mail and phones.

ASA 5505 how to create a port forwarding rule

ASA 5505 IOS ver 9.2.3
I need to create a firewall rule that will allow internal services to be accessed externally, but using port forwarding. For example I'd like to enable access to our NAS via ftp external on port 1545 and then have the ASA forward the request to the NAS internally on port 21.
I tried these commands but they didn't work:
object network NAS
host 192.168.2.8
nat (inside,outside) static interface service tcp 21 1545
access-list NASFTP-in permit tcp any object NAS eq 1545
conf t
int vlan 2
access-group NASFTP-in permit tcp any object NAS eq 1545
I really appreciate the help everyone.

try this, it worked for me, here is an example of adding a webserver with a ip of 10.10.50.60 and naming it with a object named www-server and forwarding port 80 , the way it works is you need to do three things, u need to "nat it" "foward it" and allow it in "acl"
object network obj-10.10.50.60-1
host 10.10.50.60
nat (inside,outside) static interface service tcp 80 80
object network INSIDE
nat (inside,outside) dynamic interface
object network WWW-SERVER
nat (inside,outside) static interface service tcp 80 80
access-list Outside_access_in extended permit tcp any object WWW-SERVER eq 80
access-group Outside_access_in in interface Outside

How to Port forward your router via browser

I Am having trouble port forwarding 19132 and I tried using airport extreme to port forward but everyTime I connect using my external ip it just fails.
i Have port forwarded the port, and I did it correctly, hence I watched a few videos before and after. so I need to know how to port forward 19132 via browser.
i Learned how to open the the config of the router via browser, or so I thought. I need to allow google access to my network, but I don't know how.
please help.

This is for Apple routers which do not use browser setup.. you must use the airport utility for any setup.
There is particular advice by the section GURU.. Tesserax on how to port forward in apple routers.
Finding the tips is now an exercise though.
AirPort - Port Mapping Basics using AirPort Utility v6.x

Question about editing port forwarding rules on the Actiontec

I notice that it seems to combine all rules entered for a specific internal IP address into a group. unfortunately, I don't see an option to edit the inidividual rules, or delete them. It appears to only allow the deletion of the entire rule group? So do I need to write down each of the rules pointing to a single IP address and then delete the group and enter the rules I want to keep back into the router? Thanks.

Hello,
Do you see an option to edit under advanced filtering? I would like to check into this for you I sent you a DM to start.
Shamika_Vz
Verizon Support
Notice: Content posted by Verizon employees is meant to be informational and does not supersede or change the Verizon Forums User Guidelines or Terms or Service, or your Customer Agreement Terms and Conditions or Plan.

Odd port forwarding messages ?

I'm getting lots and lots of these in my HH3 log - any ideas
11:46:04, 28 Oct.
(707643.010000) Port forwarding rule added via UPnP. protocol: UDP, external ports: any->53759, internal ports: 53759, internal client: 192.168.1.103
11:46:02, 28 Oct.
(707641.000000) Port forwarding rule added via UPnP. protocol: UDP, external ports: any->53759, internal ports: 53759, internal client: 192.168.1.103
11:45:39, 28 Oct.
Host 38:e7:d8:06:83:23 connected to SSID 'BTHub3-CWC8' at 54 Mbps

Hi whoosh,
I used to also get lots of these, mainly from only one laptop. You could check which one by checking the device list to see which one is on 192.168.1.103. You could turn off UPnP, I did - No more events will be logged, without any issues.
-+-No longer a forum member-+-

Remote TC access via port forwarding

I have been trying to setup my network for remote TC access via port forwarding. Here's my setup:
Verizon FiOS router (main router, dhcp & nat) -> connected to TC set in bridge mode with a static IP
I can remotely access the TC using Back to my Mac with no problems, and of course locally on the home network via Wifi.
Since the TC has to connect in bridge mode, port forwarding is done on the FiOS router.
If I set a port forwarding rule in the FiOS router TCP,UDP (any) to port 548, it works. However I want to use a specific connection port
so others can't connect unless they know the forwarded port. BTW, I have remote disk sharing set with Use Device Password.
So here's what works:
FiOS Router (TCP any -> 548, UDP any ->548)
What doesn't work:
FiOS router (TCP 8990 -> 548, UDP 8990 -> 548).
Is there any additional setting required for specific port forwarding to work?

You're my hero!
I also have my TC in Bridge Mode to my Verizon FIOS Router. I used to be able to access my TC remotely, but since I upgraded my router (MI424WR GigE), I had forgotten some port forwarding rules I must have established in my old router. Once I re-created these two port forwarding rules (just like yours), I can remote access my TC (with TC password) again.
In addition, I have a static host name aliased to my dynamic IP address through dyndns.org (I have the free version, which I don't think is available anymore, but there are other free providers out there) for easier remote access.
Regarding, Secure Share Disks: with TC password vs a disk password. Is one more secure than the other?
Thanks!

Re: port forwarding bt hub 3 via homeplugs

Hi I have set up portforwarding on my router and says open on my Xbox one but when I do online check it's says closed wich is giveing me lag on games like (fifa 14) I have tryed everything but there is 1 more thing I think may be causeing it I use homeplugs and they are connected through 1 main source I was wondering do you have to portforward the homeplugs and always use ip adress

To this date, I've never seen a game which requires ports to be open.
Let me explain briefly how port forwarding works:
After defining a port-forwarding rule, this tells your router which device to send incoming packets on those port(s)
You would only need to set up a rule if an external service needed to connect to an application via that port when there was no ongoing connection
Games do not require ports to be forwarded because they open connections to the multiplayer servers/voice servers and all communication between the game and the external server is via that connection
If a service required port forwarding, it would not 'lag' without it, it would simply not work. The data could not be passed to the service if it was a requirement.
If you are indeed experiencing lag due to a poor internet connection to your Xbox, follow these steps:
Restart your Home Hub and check if the connection improves
Ensure your Homeplugs are not connected to extensions, they are connected to wall sockets
Ensure the cable going between your Hub and the Homeplug is connected to the 'GBit' port on the Hub (should improve bandwidth)
Remove any port forwarding rules you have made in an attempt to fix this issue
If possible, try using a wireless connection or try wiring the Xbox directly to the router
If the connection issues occur across multiple devices, please provide details.
Thanks!
┌──────────────────────────────────────┐
To say thanks for this post, please click the star on the left
If not, please accept my apologies, hope I can help next time
└──────────────────────────────────────┘

Bit Torrent port forwarding issue and DNS resoluti...

Good morning comunity!
Something odd has happened and I was hoping for some further guidance as I'm not sure what my next steps are.
Background
I have uTorrent running on a a machine that accesses a private RSS feed of torrents I am watching. The client sees a new file posting and automaticlly downloads the .torrent file then proceeds to download the main file itself.
When I had BT installed back on 23 Decemeber I set up port forwarding to this machine, using a static IP, and there were no connection issues.
What has happened
The previous evening as I was going to bed I checked the machine and the active torrents and all my files were sitting at 0 connections for connected seeds & peers. Meaning that uTorrent wasn't able to see anyone to conenct to.
My Troubleshooting
After seeing the above I began checking my connections and set up on the router as well as the machine. uTorrent has within its preferences a port checking utility for its assinged port and that was showing no open connection. I then logged in to my HH4 and verifed my port forwarding rules: nothing had changed there.
I removed and re-added the rules, turned off UPNP as well as turned it on with no success. And during the process of adding the rule back into the system I recieved an error stating that the port was already assigned even though at that moment there were no active assignments. So I changed port numbers and the issue went away.
I then went to chack the private torrent site and the page would not display. Then went to Down For Everyone Or Just Me to check the site as well and it was reported as being up. I loaded my VPN connection to bypass BT's network and I was able to visit the site. Logged back out and did a trace and the trace reported to route to the site. Changed my DNS to Google's DNS setting and was able to access the site.
Where I am now
My torrent machine is now running via the VPN but it's not the best connection in the world as changing the DNS there did not resolve the torrent connection issue.
Does anyone, especially you folkd familar with BT and their practices, have reccomendations as to what to try next or what the issue may be?

A lot of torrent sites are starting to be blocked. Its possible the site in question is being blocked by BT(They have no choice in this as its being forced onto them by a court order same for most of the other big ISPs). If its being blocked you would still be able to access via a VPN so long as thats not being blocked too. In terms of what you can do about it not much other than keep using the VPN.

Port Forwarding Rule Added Via UPnP

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for