Portal not synchronized statements of BW

Hi
Portal integration with BW after the completion of, SAP portal not synchronized statements of BW, as BW update a report after the display of the portal not timely
I think the problem is due to JCO parameter ,The current parameter settings is
Maximal Pool Size:25
Maximum Connections:50
Connection Timeout(msec):60
Maximum Waiting Time(msec):50
How to solve this problem？ Thank you!

Hi,
Can you please explain in detail about the question "Synchronized statement of BW".
Thanks
Nishant

Similar Messages

Cache not synchronized between portal nodes

Hello.
We are having a problem with a service using a cache api (com.sapportals.wcm.util.cache.ICache from bc.sf.service.cache_api.jar). The problem is fairly hard to describe, so bear with me (long description)
Environment (+applications) description:
The portal we have is composed of 4 nodes (2 machines with 2 server nodes each, running ep6 sp2). We are using a service as described above, that basically parses a folder structure from the km repository and puts it into an object and the object into the cache. The objects are modified whenever the folder structure is modified (we have an event listener on a specific folder). Let's call this serviceApp. We have then another application that uses the cached object to display a tree in an iView. Let's call this iViewApp.
Problem description:
Whenever the folder in the km folders is modified, the cached object is modified by the serviceApp. If you are accessing the portal on -say- node1, then the cached object is immediately available to iViewApp. But if you access then the portal from -say- node2 and open the iViewApp, the updated object is not available (an older "version" of the cached object is displayed). The cached object is updated only if modifications in the km folder are performed on node2 (and hence the service instance from node2 rebuild the cached object). So: on node1 the cached object is updated. On node2 it is NOT updated. Also, the modifications performed in the km folders on nodeX are immediately available on nodeX but not on the other nodes (only after some time they become available). Also, modifying km folders on nodeX raises an event (caught by the handler running on nodeX but NOT by the handlers on other nodes). (***) When the modifications in km folders become available on the other nodes (due to synchronization, I reckon), the event handlers do not react (hence, we think an event is not raised).
Question no1:
We have come to the conclusion that maybe the problem is that the caching memory zone is not synchronized between the server nodes. Any ideas how to fix this?
Question no2:
Which api is better to use for caching? The ICache from the bc.sf.service.cache_api.jar or the ICacheService from com.sap.portal.compatibility50.cacheapi.jar? Or maybe another one (we only know of these 2)?
Question no3:
Is the (***) conclusion correct?
Thank you. Sorry again for the long post.

Hi Silviu,
We are facing the same problem with the cached objects across nodes. Would you share any information/solution to resolve this ?
Regards,
Melwyn

Documents remain in "To be synchronized" state

Hi All,
I have created an index and attached a data source to it. This datasource consists of 5 text documents.
When I re-index the datasource, all 5 documents always remain in "To be synchronized" state. Repeated re-indexing is also of no use.
I have flushed the queue a number of times, restarted the portal and trex instance and performed re-indexing. Yet, all these documents do not move from "To be synchronized" state at all.
I am not able to figure out where the problem is.
Any suggestions on this?
Thanks in advance,
Pavithra

Hi All,
We have found the solution. In the Queue parameters, the parameter "Initial Indexing Mode" was set to ON. On resetting it to Off, the documents were optimized and all of them are in OK state.
Hope this answer helps those who might face the same problem.
Regards,
Pavithra

Outlook 14.4.8 not synchronizing with Exchange 2007 anymore (shows "downloading" but no new messages shown in inbox"

Outlook 14.4.8 on iMAC Retina and Yosemite 10.10.2 is not synchronizing with Exchange 2007 anymore (shows "downloading" but no new messages shown in inbox".
Accessing Mails with Webbrowser and from Windows Outlook is working correctly.
All Macs (also the ones with OS 10.6.8) do not anymore show any new messages in inbox.
Restarted Server, tried to disable autodiscover on macs and deleting/adding account and repairing database does not fix the problem. Also restarted server several times.
We have the same problem on 2 imacs retina with yosemite and on 2 mac pro with 10.6.8 and different office 2011 versions.
i tried to configure the exchange account in apple mail on yosemite and it also states "connected" and does list some folders but no new mails are getting in.
Windows clients and outlook on them works and syncs fine, and also when connecting via webbrowser at owa it must be a mac-specific/webdav issue.
exchange 2007 Sp3 Version 8.3 (bild 83.6) and Update Rollup 15 for sp3 (automatic updates "HIGH" for server and clients)
there is one update popping up again and again even after everytime successull installation: Windows Mlicious Software Removal Tool x64 - October 2010.
i tried to configure a new user with empty mailbox and configured it with microsoft mail (mac - yosemite) as exchange and was able to send a mail from there (even if quite delayed).
but there are not coming in any mails.
same exchange accounts triggered by imap do work and also via owa.
Exchange Accounts in Outlook for MAC and also in Mail (Yosemite) do show the folder structures but there is no mails showing up. I can send mails from the exchange accounts created but they seem to be processed with a delay of like 15minutes and outlook
is giving error "end of file reached" but messages are send after some time.
Does seem like EWS is extremely slow, to slow perhaps to sync and therefore ending in timeout.
Also i cannot reach the server from externally over ssl https 443. if testing port 443 of exchange from outside the port seems closed even firewall settings of sbs 2008 and sonicwall ports are correctly open.
could it be there is something in regarding webdav which is very slow and leading to timeouts ?
in application log i do have the following two information events every few minute:
The Exchange Web Services started successfully. Event ID 1
and
Process STORE.EXE (PID=3688). Exchange Active Directory Provider has discovered the following servers with the following characteristics:
(Server name | Roles | Enabled | Reachability | Synchronized | GC capable | PDC | SACL right | Critical Data | Netlogon | OS Version)
In-site:
SERVER.org.local CDG 1 7 7 1 0 1 1 7 1
Out-of-site:
Errors in Application log:
The Open Procedure for service "BITS" in DLL "C:\Windows\system32\bitsperf.dll" failed. Performance data for this service will not be available. The first four bytes (DWORD) of the Data section
The entry <C:\WSUS\WSUSCONTENT\CONTENTFOLDERACLSCHECK.TXT> in the hash map cannot be updated.
An exception Microsoft.Exchange.Data.Storage.ConversionFailedException occurred while converting message Imap4Message 69447
Also outlook 2011 clients are asked by time to time to reenter pwds and errors like "connection is closed. 13"
Faulting application taskeng.exe, version 6.0.6002.18342, time stamp 0x4cd34898, faulting module ntdll.dll, version 6.0.6002.18881, time stamp 0x51da3d16, exception code 0xc000071b, fault offset 0x0000000000082445, process id 0x3288
Certificate Services Client Provider pautoenr.dll raised an exception. Exception code 3221225477.
Backup Exec:
FULL_BACKUP -- The job failed with the following error: A failure occurred querying the Writer status.
Volume Shadow Copy Service error: A critical component required by the Volume Shadow Copy service is not registered. This might happened if an error occurred during Windows setup or during installation of a Shadow Copy provider. The
error returned from CoCreateInstance
Exchange VSS Writer (instance 2d932ef8-6319-4ab8-a45f-1242480b44ad:15) failed with error code 1295 when processing the backup completion event.

Hi,
Since Outlook running on Windows works well, it seems an issue on the Mac side. I suggest ask Mac for help so that you can get more professional suggestions.
More information for your reference:
Please try to verify whether there is any expired certificate from the computer personal store.
If it is the case, please remove them.
Thanks
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]
Mavis Huang
TechNet Community Support

Failed over to a Aysnc Replica and now previous primary replica(Now Secondary) is in NOT SYNC state

Hello All,
Here is my situation :
3 Nodes in an AG configuration, and its a multi-site cluster. Sync commit between 2 nodes in one DC and Async commit to a node in the DR DC.
AG is failed over to the Async Replica which is the DR site and all the databases comes up fine and application also can connect using the listener.
When checked the state of secondary databases, its in NOT SYNC mode. Data is suspended automatically. I can resume data movement to fix the problem, but was curious why this will be in NOT SYNC mode?
Thanks in advance.
Thank you,
Anup
<div> Anup | Database Consultant Blog: <a href="www.sqlsailor.com/">www.sqlsailor.com</a> Twitter: <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/AnupWarrier"> Follow me !</a>
 Please use Mark as Answer if my post solved your problem and use Vote As Helpful if a post was useful. </div>

Hello Anup,
The reason this happens is because of the forced failover needed to be used when moving to an Async replica. It will cause all other replicas to become suspended due to the fact that it is never known if data loss will occur or not.
It might not make sense right now, but think about a situation where the databases are not synchronized and failover is forced (it has to work in all situations). There may be a good bit of data on the primary replica that has not yet made it (or partially)
to the async secondary. It wouldn't make sense to negotiate the primary back down (after all, it's the async one) and undo valid transactions. It also allows for a database snapshot or other method to be done on the old sync primary which could be used for
DR purposes to get those valid transactions and data out.
BOL Doc:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh213151.aspx#ForcedFailover
Sean Gallardy | Blog |
Twitter

Synchronized statements and deadlock

I've been reading on the tutorial about synchronized statements:
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/essential/concurrency/locksync.html
...and I don't understand when it says, about the following example:
    public void addName(String name) {
        synchronized(this) {
            lastName = name;
            nameCount++;
        nameList.add(name);
    }"In this example, the addName method needs to synchronize changes to lastName and nameCount, but also needs to avoid synchronizing invocations of other objects' methods. (Invoking other objects' methods from synchronized code can create problems that are described in the section on Liveness.) "
Why do I need to avoid synchronizing invocations of nameList object? When thread1 gets an instrinsic lock to the instance of this class, does it also get a lock on the nameList object?
I suppose they're saying that I should avoid synchronizing invocations of nameList object to avoid deadlock, but I can't see how a deadlock would occur here.
I've read about deadlock but the example on the tutorial seams a different case to me because that example puts to objects crossing data between each other.
Another doubt is: in the deadlock example, which is found here
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/essential/concurrency/deadlock.html
thread1 invokes synchronized method "bow" on object alphonse, while thread2 invokes that same method on object gaston. Does this garantee that the methods will not interleave? Doesn't it have to be the same object being used on both threads?
Quoting the same tutorial: "It is not possible for two invocations of synchronized methods on the same object to interleave."
Help appreciated on clarifying this.

>
If you use the first bit of code and make another block to synchronize on nameList then you could have another method that synchronizes inside on nameList and that could deadlock if it also needs to synchronize on this.
I'm still confused. If I had in MyClass
public void addName(String name) {
    synchronized(this) {
        lastName = name;
        nameCount++;
        nameList.add(name);
}which I understand is equivalent to
public void synchronize addName(String name) {
        lastName = name;
        nameCount++;
        nameList.add(name);
}and then I had
public void removeName(String name) {
    synchronized(this) {
        lastName = null;
        nameCount--;
        nameList.remove(name);
}then when thread1 invoked myClass.addName(someString) would acquire a lock on myClass and thread2, invoking myClass.removeName(someString) would have to wait for thread1 to conclude. It doesn't seam to be nothing wrong on this to me...
Please help.

Calendar not synchronizing with Exchange server

2 weeks after upgrading to OS X 10.9.4 Calendar is not synchronizing with our university Exchange server. Problem is with 2 different computers, iMAC and MacBook Air (both with ethernet and wifi)). Mail is working/synchronizing fine. Outlook calendar (on both same Macs and Parallels PC) is synchronizing fine. iCLOUD events are shown.
Noticed that it is a one-way problem- not downloading/synchronizing from the server but events entered on both problematic Calenders are found in Outlook (and of course in the OutlookWebApplication). Practically I can't work anymore with Calendar.
Tried to delete Caches - didn't help. Tried to restore old preferences- didn't help. Any help? Thanks!!

+1
Still happens with 10.6.2.
It clearly states in mail help that this should happen -- yet it does not.
Anyone?
Apple?
s

SQL2012 SP2 CU1 Availability Group database not synchronizing after applying February Microsoft patches

Hi,
We are starting our monthly patching and have a situation with SQL2012 SP2 CU1 Availability Groups databases not synchronizing after patching the secondary replica. This seems a little like
http://support2.microsoft.com/kb/3033492/en-us which was for CU3 and CU4 builds. The dashboard on the Primary shows the secondary as not synchronizing. The errorlogs on both nodes show the connection
has recovered but the dashboard shows critical errors. This is running on Windows 2012.
Thanks
Chris

Lydia,
I am referring to MS15-009 to MS15-017 that came out on Tuesday. These are the only patches we have applied. On our two node Availability Group setup we had the patches applied to the secondary node and then it was restarted. It came up fine and SQL is running
as expected.
This is from the primary node errorlog:-
AlwaysOn Availability Groups connection with secondary database terminated for primary database 'XXX_DEVL' on the availability replica with Replica ID: {e6468c4d-9431-4052-88c0-07d3b3eb428c}. This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
A connection for availability group 'YYYYY50_AG' from availability replica 'YYYYY50AV' with id [0E53235A-0FBB-4E18-8C40-A0D72F30C36A] to 'YYYYY50BV' with id [E6468C4D-9431-4052-88C0-07D3B3EB428C] has been successfully established. This is an
informational message only. No user action is required.
AlwaysOn Availability Groups connection with secondary database established for primary database 'XXX_DEVL' on the availability replica with Replica ID: {e6468c4d-9431-4052-88c0-07d3b3eb428c}. This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
On the secondary node errorlog:-
Skipping the default startup of database 'XXX_DEVL' because the database belongs to an availability group (Group ID: 65541). The database will be started by the availability group. This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
The state of the local availability replica in availability group 'YYYYY50_AG' has changed from 'RESOLVING_NORMAL' to 'SECONDARY_NORMAL'. The replica state changed because of either a startup, a failover, a communication issue, or a cluster error. For more
information, see the availability group dashboard, SQL Server error log, Windows Server Failover Cluster management console or Windows Server Failover Cluster log.
AlwaysOn Availability Groups data movement for database 'XXX_DEVL' has been suspended for the following reason: "system" (Source ID 5; Source string: 'SUSPEND_FROM_RESTART'). To resume data movement on the database, you will need to resume the
database manually. For information about how to resume an availability database, see SQL Server Books Online.
Nonqualified transactions are being rolled back in database XXX_DEVL for an AlwaysOn Availability Groups state change. Estimated rollback completion: 100%. This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
AlwaysOn Availability Groups connection with primary database terminated for secondary database 'XXX_DEVL' on the availability replica with Replica ID: {0e53235a-0fbb-4e18-8c40-a0d72f30c36a}. This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
Now I see the suspend message. Running the select on sys.dm_exec_requests there are NO DB_STARTUP ones on either node or blocking.
Next action is probably to have the patches removed from the secondary node and see if all is well and then try patch one by one to see which one causes the issue.
Chris

Problem changing VISA synchronous state

This seems to be a bug. Can I get a CAR number for this?
http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW/Changing-VISA-Synchronous-state/m-p/2358338#M735511
Trying to change VISA read/write synchronous state.
LabVIEW Help says to right click on the node and select the mode you want (Synchronous I/O Mode).
I right click on it, See that "Synchronous" is checked, and because it is easier or built into my mouse memory I just re-assert the click on and choose "Synchronous", except that when I do that, it changes it to Asynchronous. It behaves as if any choosing of the Synchronous I/O Mode just toggles the state, instead of actually setting the state to what you chose.
This does not seem logical to me. Am I doing this right, or is there some other problem going on here?

Hi Warren,
I looked at the issue you have described and filed a CAR. The CAR number is 399613.
Regards,
Arham H
Applications Engineer
National Instruments

Changing VISA Synchronous state

Trying to change VISA read/write synchronous state.
LabVIEW Help says to right click on the node and select the mode you want (Synchronous I/O Mode).
I right click on it, See that "Synchronous" is checked, and because it is easier or built into my mouse memory I just re-assert the click on and choose "Synchronous", except that when I do that, it changes it to Asynchronous. It behaves as if any choosing of the Synchronous I/O Mode just toggles the state, instead of actually setting the state to what you chose.
This does not seem logical to me. Am I doing this right, or is there some other problem going on here?

I see what you're saying. Any click on either of the two pull-rights toggles the current selection.
I will agree that the semantics of the menu could be better, but as a practical matter it's below my threshold
The icon changes to include the watchface glyph when the node is set to asynch, so I only right-click on it when I want to change it. And it's waaay better than back in the days of yore, when it was a global app preference (syncVISA=TRUE, IIRC).
Dave
David Boyd
Sr. Test Engineer
Philips Respironics
Certified LabVIEW Developer

WSUS not Synchronizing MS11-025

A vulnerability scan revealed that several Windows 7 machines on my network needed security update MS11-025 (Visual C++ Redistributable). In my case we are:
1. WSUS is setup to synchronize Windows updates
2. None of these machines are running Visual Studio (ie only the VC++ redistributable is installed)
3. WSUS does not show any patches for the security update MS11-025 unless the Visual Studio 2008 is synchronized.
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/a1086629-e9c4-4d1d-92b8-e4a236b0c0b8/bulletin-ms11025-updates-2538243-2538242-not-listed-in-wsus?forum=winserverwsus
Unfortunately even if Visual Studio 2008 is selected for synchronization the MS11-025 security update that WSUS imports not the one applicable to a Windows 7 only install of Visual C++.
Why is this happening? What is the solution and if an update does not appear in WSUS after synchronization is it possible to manually import it and select applicable machines for install?

but the VC++ redistributable can exist without Visual Studio.
Yes, it can; which has absolutely nothing to do with how you get the udpate package(s) synchronized into your WSUS Server.
Your list of patches specifically states that the redist is found in Visual Studio.
No. What it says is that you must have the appropriate Visual Studio PRODUCT CATEGORY selected for synchronization in order to get those updates.
I had a server 2008 R2 OS that needed the update according to Nessus and I manually confirmed that Nessus was correct. This is the patch/update
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=26368. It is meant for the standalone VC++ redistributable without an installation of Visual Studio.
Great! In order to get the Microsoft Visual C++ 2008 Service Pack 1 Security Update,
you must be synchronizing the Visual Studio product category that provides that security update. That product category (as noted above, in both your original post, as well as my reply) is
Visual Studio 2008.
This update does not synchronize in WSUS. I had to apply it manually. In fact I believe this update is not detected by the Windows Update agent because I had to apply it manually to machines that were updating directly from Mircrosoft.
The WUAgent can only "detect" updates that have been synchronized to the WSUS Server. If you have not synchronized the update, the WUAgent can't tell you squat about the need, or lack thereof, for that update (until you go to Microsoft Update) -- at which point
the WUAgent now has access to ALL product categories and ALL update classifications and what you've synced (or not) to the WSUS server is totally irrelevant.
Without Nessus I would not have known that this component was out of date.
This is a great testimony to why an independent security vulnerability scanner should always be used:
Because you cannot possibly know about missing updates if the updates aren't on the WSUS server in the first place.
Lawrence Garvin, M.S., MCSA, MCITP:EA, MCDBA
SolarWinds Head Geek
Microsoft MVP - Software Packaging, Deployment & Servicing (2005-2014)
My MVP Profile: http://mvp.microsoft.com/en-us/mvp/Lawrence%20R%20Garvin-32101
http://www.solarwinds.com/gotmicrosoft
The views expressed on this post are mine and do not necessarily reflect the views of SolarWinds.

Slave instance can not synchronized with the master for a long time

Hi,
Slave instance can not synchronized with the master for a long time, and the gap of LSNs between slave and master are more and more larger. The transfer bytes per second between master and slave is 118MB/s , upper limit to the ethernet card. Why???
ENVIRONMENT:
1. A network program which we called mcdb is based on BDB 4.8.30. It is used to accept get/set requests and then query data from bdb or save data to bdb.
2. mcdb implements replication with bdb replication manager api. The default start replication policy is DB_REP_ELECTION, rep ack policy is DB_REPMGR_ACKS_ONE_PEER and rep priority is 100.
3. The bdb data files, bdb log files, region files and rep files are all in the same home directory.
4. There are two instances of the mcdb are separately on two standalone servers which has no other programs. These two instances are in one replication group which can elect a master automatically.
5. The master instance is online, which has lots of requests (get, set, delete).
ACTIONS:
1. Start two mcdb instances on two servers and the two instance make a replication group. Slave has already synchronized with the master.
2. Stop the slave for a long time (more than 20 hours).
3. Start the slave instance to synchronize data with master.
RESULT:
1. the gap of LSNs between slave and master are more and more larger.
2. db_stat of master and slave:
master db_stat:
467170     Number of PERM messages not acknowledged
9245     Number of messages queued due to network delay
172415     Number of messages discarded due to queue length
25880     Number of existing connections dropped
3407     Number of failed new connection attempts
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
DB_REPMGR site information:
10.67.15.146 (eid: 0, port: 30011)
Environment configured as a replication master
331726/3574994     Next LSN to be used
0/0     Not waiting for any missed log records
328872/466092     Maximum permanent LSN
0     Next page number expected
0     Not waiting for any missed pages
0     Number of duplicate master conditions originally detected at this site
2147M     Current environment ID (2147483647)
100     Current environment priority
49     Current generation number
50     Election generation number for the current or next election
2323     Number of duplicate log records received
0     Number of log records currently queued
6768     Maximum number of log records ever queued at once
55284     Total number of log records queued
120M     Number of log records received and appended to the log (120475988)
111     Number of log records missed and requested
2147M     Current master ID (2147483647)
2     Number of times the master has changed
0     Number of messages received with a bad generation number
8505306     Number of messages received and processed
12     Number of messages ignored due to pending recovery
471869     Number of failed message sends
12M     Number of messages sent (12959945)
0     Number of new site messages received
1     Number of environments believed to be in the replication group
990543     Transmission limited
0     Number of outdated conditions detected
0     Number of duplicate page records received
0     Number of page records received and added to databases
0     Number of page records missed and requested
Startup complete
6244678     Number of transactions applied
0     Number of startsync messages delayed
1     Number of elections held
1     Number of elections won
No election in progress
0.057097     Duration of last election (seconds)
8944103     Number of bulk buffer sends triggered by full buffer
0     Number of single records exceeding bulk buffer size
5273M     Number of records added to a bulk buffer (5273592170)
10M     Number of bulk buffers sent (10490865)
0     Number of re-request messages received
0     Number of request messages this client failed to process
0     Number of request messages received by this client
slave db_stat:
0     Number of PERM messages not acknowledged
0     Number of messages queued due to network delay
0     Number of messages discarded due to queue length
1454     Number of existing connections dropped
0     Number of failed new connection attempts
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
DB_REPMGR site information:
10.67.15.147 (eid: 0, port: 30011)
Environment configured as a replication client
329544/2916048     Next LSN expected
330433/2013808     LSN of first log record we have after missed log records
329543/5500501     Maximum permanent LSN
0     Next page number expected
0     Not waiting for any missed pages
0     Number of duplicate master conditions originally detected at this site
2147M     Current environment ID (2147483647)
100     Current environment priority
49     Current generation number
50     Election generation number for the current or next election
5256M     Number of duplicate log records received (5256599432)
3925284     Number of log records currently queued
3925285     Maximum number of log records ever queued at once
4880561     Total number of log records queued
3578038     Number of log records received and appended to the log
1912297     Number of log records missed and requested
0     Current master ID
1     Number of times the master has changed
0     Number of messages received with a bad generation number
12M     Number of messages received and processed (12980442)
2     Number of messages ignored due to pending recovery
0     Number of failed message sends
1912307     Number of messages sent
0     Number of new site messages received
0     Number of environments believed to be in the replication group
0     Transmission limited
0     Number of outdated conditions detected
0     Number of duplicate page records received
0     Number of page records received and added to databases
0     Number of page records missed and requested
Startup incomplete
110568     Number of transactions applied
80     Number of startsync messages delayed
0     Number of elections held
0     Number of elections won
No election in progress
0     Number of bulk buffer sends triggered by full buffer
0     Number of single records exceeding bulk buffer size
0     Number of records added to a bulk buffer
0     Number of bulk buffers sent
0     Number of re-request messages received
0     Number of request messages this client failed to process
0     Number of request messages received by this client
Edited by: 899585 on 2013-1-4 下午10:54
Edited by: 899585 on 2013-1-4 下午10:55

Hi,
Unfortunately, this issue is beyond the level of what is supported over the forum. Performance related issues are extremely complex and require an in-depth understanding of your environment and dedicated support. In a generic sense, you can look at this as a basic queueing problem. You have a server that went down and work is still coming in. When the server gets started it is possible that it may never catch up depending on new work coming in and the rate at processing the old work.
So what would you do in this case --- one thing would be to reduce the new work coming in. In HA terms this would be slowing the master down and you can increase DB_REP_ACK_TIMEOUT for this. Another thing you could do is add fresh servers to help reduce the workload. In HA terms, this would be the equivalent of restarting the client and give it a fresh look at everything. Another thing you could do is replan the system and load balance. In HA terms, it would mean something like take a hot backup of the master and reinit a client from scratch.
If you are interested in getting a dedicated support person working on this concern, please let me know and we can move forward down that path. Just respond to the thread with your email address and I will get in contact with you so we can pursue that approach.
thanks
mike

Share Point 2013 MP for SCOM 2007 R2 - Not Monitored State

Hi All,
I have imported SharePoint 2013 MP in SCOM 2007 R2 and the sharepoint farm group is in "not monitored" state, moreover only one computer name out of all sharepoint farm servers is being populated in unidentified machines (rest are not being
shown anywhere in Microsoft SharePoint folder).
I have followed all the steps as per installation guide of sharepoint 2013 (foundation & Server) MP. Configured run as account has the farm admin rights.
Please help as it seems discovery is not working properly.
Regards,
Prabh.

Hi,
Hope the below blog be helpful:
Configuring the SharePoint 2013 Management Pack
http://blogs.technet.com/b/kevinholman/archive/2013/05/14/configuring-the-sharepoint-2013-management-pack.aspx
Please go through it.
Regards,
Yan Li
Regards, Yan Li

Sold to party refernce data not synchroning properly

Hi Guys,
Today I came across a new issue...
In CRM order we have External reference to sold to party. Here we enter PO number at header level and it will synchronize to R/3.with out any problem.
But when I try to change the PO Number in R/3 order at header level, that value is not synchronizing with CRM header level,
Only for Billed Itemu2019s PO number is getting changed for remaining items it remains unchanged.
Is it standard behavior of system or is there anything we need to change?
Please help me on this,
Thanks & Regards,
Shaik

Hi Shaik,
Please check the filters in SALESDOCUMENT middleware adapter object in CRM. If proper filters are not in place, it will not send the changes from ECC to CRM.
//Bhanu

Javascript not working with 'Display as Text (does not saves state)'

Hi,
We have these following items in P3 of our application,
P3_EDIT_ACCOUNT Display as Text (saves state)
P3_USEFUL_LINKS Display as Text (saves state)
P3_LAST_APPROVED Display as Text (saves state)
P3_ARCHIVES Display as Text (saves state)
And we are initializing these items in a pl/sql process under 'Page Rendering'
For example,
:P3_ARCHIVES := 'Archives</a><td> ';
When our environment was upgraded from HTMLDB1.5 to HTMLDB2.0,
instead of displaying the proper value of :P3_ARCHIVES,
it was displaying the tags,
i.e. instead of displaying 'Archives', it was displaying the whole
'Archives</a><td> '
So, when we changed all items to 'Display as Text (does not saves state)' and it was working.
But then we have another problem,
We render the rest of the same page with another pl/sql block,
Here is a portion from that pl/sql for your reference,
htp.p('
<script>
//Script to check the status change.
//The script source is rendered through PL/SQL.
function checkStatus()
var promptStr = someString;
if(ans.toUpperCase() == "AMBER" || ans.toUpperCase() == "RED")
 var cnfm = confirm(promptStr);
 if(cnfm)
 do something....
</script>
htp.print('
<td width="5%" bgcolor="#ebebc5" height="19" align="middle" >
<input TYPE="radio" name="'||l_g_fnumber||'" value="GREEN"');
IF l_allow_update THEN
 htp.print(' onClick="checkStatus()"');
ELSE
htp.print(' disabled onmousedown="return false;"');
 do something....
Now the issue is , when we changed all items to 'Display as Text (does not saves state)', the checkStatus() function is not getting called in the onClick
event of the radio button and hence the confirm window for the call to
confirm(promptStr) is not coming up.
But if we revert back the items to 'Display as Text (saves state)',
the checkStatus() javascript function is getting called properly but html tags are displayed against the items instead of the proper value (as mentioned in ********)
Please do let us know a possible solution to this issue.
Thanks & Regards-
Rupak

Thanks Varad for your response.
This is the error i am getting.
1 error has occurred
PLSQL anonymous block source type can be used ONLY with Display Text (based on PLSQL) item type.
yes i am using in the source..
I also tried with the PL/SQL Expression of FUNCTION in this case it is executing the query but once i run the page ora- 06550 error occured.
Thanks
AT
Edited by: ranu on Jan 8, 2009 2:51 PM

Portal not synchronized statements of BW

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for