Portal : Relationship between Actions vs. Permission

Hi Experts,
Kindly advise how can we view the relationship between Actions.xml file and
Permission in java.
I cannot find out how it's related.
For example, I would like to know what are those permissions which related to Action "AclSuperUser".
Thank you !
Message was edited by:
Erika Goh

Thank you for your answers.
Vaibhav -
I have checked the "End User" option for Everyone group in producer portal.
How do I assign security zones permission to Everyone group ?
Can you please throw some light in that area.
Dao -
I do not want to use the Guest user any where.
However, internally some how the "Guest" user is being used for communication between producer and consumer.
Also, the Guest user we are talking about is the one on the producer portal (not on consumer)
How can I make use of a different user for FPN purposes and make sure that it has access to all the FPN related services on the producer ?
Once again - to emphasize -
If I assign super admin role to Guest user on producer portal - every thing works fine (RRA and RDL)
If I remove the super admin role to Guest user on producer portal - neither RRA nor RDL will work.
Kindly suggest.
Thank You once again for your time.
-- Raj

Similar Messages

Relationship between Portal and back-end roles in business package

Hi all,
I wonder how technically works on the backend system when I install a BP for SAP EP. Let's say for example that I installed on the portal the business package for SRM. I will have on the Portal some roles configured (buyer, supplier, invoice manager, etc), and some iviews in them organized by pages and workest.
How can I see the relations with those roles and the roles on the SRM backend system? And then: if I modify a standard role on the Portal, adding new functionalites (iviews), I do update the backend role? We are going to implement SSO, and users will be the same on Portal and backend system. But that also means I need to assign users to backend roles on the backend system, isn't it?
I would be glad to you if someone can provide me also a link to a document explaining the relationshipe between backend roles management and portal roles management.
Thanks a lot,
Valentina

To add.. no, you will not update a backend SRM role if you update an iView on the Portal. The Backend roles will always be assigned to the user via PFCG and do not change automatically with the Portal roles.
This help document might help you understand the concept better (Look at the Permissions vs Authorisations section):
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c605c690-0201-0010-e8b5-94677245a46b
Hope this helps. I am sure SAP/SDN library has many such documents that you can read through.
Sudha
Message was edited by:
Sudha Mohan

Getting Error The trust relationship between the primary domain and the trusted domain failed in SharePoint 2010

Hi,
SharePoint 2010 Backup has been taken from production and restored through Semantic Tool in one of the server.The wepapplication of which the backup was taken is working fine.
But the problem is that the SharePoint is not working correctly.We cannot create any new webapplication ,cannot navigate to the ServiceApplications.aspx page it shows error.Even the Search and UserProfile Services of the existing Web Application is not working.Checking
the SharePoint Logs I found out the below exception
11/30/2011 12:14:53.78 WebAnalyticsService.exe (0x06D4)        0x2D24 SharePoint Foundation         Database
8u1d High    Flushing connection pool 'Data Source=urasvr139;Initial Catalog=SharePoint_Config;Integrated Security=True;Enlist=False;Connect Timeout=15'
11/30/2011 12:14:53.78 WebAnalyticsService.exe (0x06D4)        0x2D24 SharePoint Foundation         Topology
2myf Medium Enabling the configuration filesystem and memory caches.
11/30/2011 12:14:53.79 WebAnalyticsService.exe (0x06D4)        0x12AC SharePoint Foundation         Database
8u1d High    Flushing connection pool 'Data Source=urasvr139;Initial Catalog=SharePoint_Config;Integrated Security=True;Enlist=False;Connect Timeout=15'
11/30/2011 12:14:53.79 WebAnalyticsService.exe (0x06D4)        0x12AC SharePoint Foundation         Topology
2myf Medium Enabling the configuration filesystem and memory caches.
11/30/2011 12:14:55.54 mssearch.exe (0x0864)                   0x2B24 SharePoint Server Search      Propagation Manager
fo2s Medium [3b3-c-0 An] aborting all propagation tasks and propagation-owned transactions after waiting 300 seconds (0 indexes) [indexpropagator.cxx:1607] d:\office\source\search\native\ytrip\tripoli\propagation\indexpropagator.cxx
11/30/2011 12:14:55.99 OWSTIMER.EXE (0x1DF4)                   0x1994 SharePoint Foundation         Topology
75dz High    The SPPersistedObject with
Name User Profile Service Application, Id 9577a6aa-33ec-498e-b198-56651b53bf27, Parent 13e1ef7d-40c2-4bcb-906c-a080866ca9bd failed to initialize with the following error: System.SystemException: The trust relationship between the primary domain and the trusted
domain failed.       at System.Security.Principal.SecurityIdentifier.TranslateToNTAccounts(IdentityReferenceCollection sourceSids, Boolean& someFailed)     at System.Security.Principal.SecurityIdentifier.Translate(IdentityReferenceCollection
sourceSids, Type targetType, Boolean forceSuccess)     at System.Security.Principal.SecurityIdentifier.Translate(Type targetType)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPAce`1.get_PrincipalName()
at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPAcl`1.Add(String princip...
11/30/2011 12:14:55.99* OWSTIMER.EXE (0x1DF4)                   0x1994 SharePoint Foundation         Topology
75dz High    ...alName, String displayName, Byte[] securityIdentifier, T grantRightsMask, T denyRightsMask)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPAcl`1..ctor(String persistedAcl)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPServiceApplication.OnDeserialization()     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPIisWebServiceApplication.OnDeserialization()     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPPersistedObject.Initialize(ISPPersistedStoreProvider
persistedStoreProvider, Guid id, Guid parentId, String name, SPObjectStatus status, Int64 version, XmlDocument state)
11/30/2011 12:14:56.00 OWSTIMER.EXE (0x1DF4)                   0x1994 SharePoint Foundation         Topology
8xqx High    Exception in RefreshCache. Exception message :The trust relationship between the primary domain and the trusted domain failed.
11/30/2011 12:14:56.00 OWSTIMER.EXE (0x1DF4)                   0x1994 SharePoint Foundation         Timer
2n2p Monitorable The following error occured while trying to initialize the timer: System.SystemException: The trust relationship between the primary domain and the trusted domain failed.       at System.Security.Principal.SecurityIdentifier.TranslateToNTAccounts(IdentityReferenceCollection
sourceSids, Boolean& someFailed)     at System.Security.Principal.SecurityIdentifier.Translate(IdentityReferenceCollection sourceSids, Type targetType, Boolean forceSuccess)     at System.Security.Principal.SecurityIdentifier.Translate(Type
targetType)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPAce`1.get_PrincipalName()     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPAcl`1.Add(String principalName, String displayName, Byte[] securityIdentifier, T grantRightsMask,
T denyRightsMask)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administrati...
11/30/2011 12:14:56.00* OWSTIMER.EXE (0x1DF4)                   0x1994 SharePoint Foundation         Timer
2n2p Monitorable ...on.SPAcl`1..ctor(String persistedAcl)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPServiceApplication.OnDeserialization()     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPIisWebServiceApplication.OnDeserialization()
at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPPersistedObject.Initialize(ISPPersistedStoreProvider persistedStoreProvider, Guid id, Guid parentId, String name, SPObjectStatus status, Int64 version, XmlDocument state)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPConfigurationDatabase.GetObject(Guid
id, Guid parentId, Guid type, String name, SPObjectStatus status, Byte[] versionBuffer, String xml)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPConfigurationDatabase.GetObject(SqlDataReader dr)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPConfigurationDatabase.RefreshCache(Int64
currentVe...
Please guide me on the above issue ,this will be of great help
Thanks.

I have same error. Verified for trust , ports , cleaned up cache.. nothing has helped.
The problem is caused by User profile Synch Service:
UserProfileProperty_WCFLogging :: ProfilePropertyService.GetProfileProperties Exception: System.SystemException:
The trust relationship between the primary domain and the trusted domain failed.       at System.Security.Principal.SecurityIdentifier.TranslateToNTAccounts(IdentityReferenceCollection sourceSids,
Boolean& someFailed)     at System.Security.Principal.SecurityIdentifier.Translate(IdentityReferenceCollection sourceSids, Type targetType, Boolean forceSuccess)     at System.Security.Principal.SecurityIdentifier.Translate(Type
targetType)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPAce`1.get_PrincipalName()     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPAcl`1.Add(String principalName, String displayName, SPIdentifierType identifierType, Byte[]
identifier, T grantRightsMask, T denyRigh...
08/23/2014 13:00:20.96*        w3wp.exe (0x2204)
        0x293C        SharePoint Portal Server              User Profiles
        eh0u        Unexpected        ...tsMask)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPAcl`1..ctor(String persistedAcl)
at Microsoft.Office.Server.Administration.UserProfileApplication.get_SerializedAdministratorAcl()     at Microsoft.Office.Server.Administration.UserProfileApplication.GetProperties()     at Microsoft.Office.Server.UserProfiles.ProfilePropertyService.GetProfileProperties()
Please let me know if you any solution found for this?
Regards,
Kunal

How to create the relationship between ESSBASE 11 and DM in OBIEE11

Hi Experts,
I have one requirement that there is one property table named 'Store Master' in DW,and it contains a lot of attribute, such as Open Date, Close Date, IS 24 Hour etc.
But another data source is essbase and based on this source, I create all reports.
In ESSBASE, it has one dimension and hierarchy Location, and it has four level, Country(L1),Region (L2),Province(L3),Store(L4)
So I want to know how to create the relationship between Location (ESSBASE) and Store Master (DM).
I try to create one relationship in physical layer between Gen4,Location and Store, then drag the open date and close date into Location Dimension in BMM,then Presentation Layer.
When I drag column 'Open Date' ,'Gen4,Location ' and 'Sales' into reports, it will generate the following error message:
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 43119] Query Failed: [nQSError: 14020] None of the fact tables are compatible with the query request Dim Region.Store Open Date. (HY000)
However, when I remove the column 'Open Date'. it will be ok.
So what I missing the steps? Please help me. Thanks.

>
'2. Now, pull the 'Store' column from relational DB onto the Gen5, Location column from Essbase. This action now creates, two logical sources for your 'Store' column.'
If the length from different data source is not same,such as 1001(DM),L_1001(ESSBASE), can I drag the 'Store' column from relational DB onto the Gen5, Location column from Essbase?
I think it does not work.Right?Hi,
I am not sure if you are talking about the length(as in varchar(128)) of the member value being different in different sources, or the member itself is different in both the sources.
I am still assuming, that you are referring to the members not same in both the sources.If it is, the whole concept of federation is based on conforming dimensions. So, it needs that the same dimension information is present in both the sources and then only, you know we can analyze the numbers based on this dimension. So, either the dimension being different in both sources, or the members not present in both the dimensions might lead to incorrect numbers.
So I select Store Attributes in relation DB and Location in ESSBASE in physical layer, then create the physical join, such as right("Hour Sales"."H_Sales".""."H_Sales"."Gen6,Location",4) = "Authorization".""."EDW"."T_EDW_MDM_STORE"."US_CODE", then drag the OPEN_DATE and CLOSE_DATE in relation DB to Location in ESSBASE in BMM,finially drag them into presentation layer.We create physical layer relationships, to send over the same relation to the underlying database during querying. So, creating a physical relationship between essbase cube and relation database would not help here.
When you set up this federation, BI Server sends individual queries to each source and maps the conforming dimension members internally.
Hope I was clear, and this helps.
Thank you,
Dhar

How to create the relationship between ESSBASE 11 and DM in OBIEE 11G?

Hi Experts,
I have one requirement that there is one property table named 'Store Master' in DW,and it contains a lot of attribute, such as Open Date, Close Date, IS 24 Hour etc.
But another data source is essbase and based on this source, I create all reports.
In ESSBASE, it has one dimension and hierarchy Location, and it has four level, Country(L1),Region (L2),Province(L3),Store(L4)
So I want to know how to create the relationship between Location (ESSBASE) and Store Master (DM).
I try to create one relationship in physical layer between Gen4,Location and Store, then drag the open date and close date into Location Dimension in BMM,then Presentation Layer.
When I drag column 'Open Date' ,'Gen4,Location ' and 'Sales' into reports, it will generate the following error message:
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 43119] Query Failed: [nQSError: 14020] None of the fact tables are compatible with the query request Dim Region.Store Open Date. (HY000)
However, when I remove the column 'Open Date'. it will be ok
So what I missing the steps? Please help me. Thanks.

>
'2. Now, pull the 'Store' column from relational DB onto the Gen5, Location column from Essbase. This action now creates, two logical sources for your 'Store' column.'
If the length from different data source is not same,such as 1001(DM),L_1001(ESSBASE), can I drag the 'Store' column from relational DB onto the Gen5, Location column from Essbase?
I think it does not work.Right?Hi,
I am not sure if you are talking about the length(as in varchar(128)) of the member value being different in different sources, or the member itself is different in both the sources.
I am still assuming, that you are referring to the members not same in both the sources.If it is, the whole concept of federation is based on conforming dimensions. So, it needs that the same dimension information is present in both the sources and then only, you know we can analyze the numbers based on this dimension. So, either the dimension being different in both sources, or the members not present in both the dimensions might lead to incorrect numbers.
So I select Store Attributes in relation DB and Location in ESSBASE in physical layer, then create the physical join, such as right("Hour Sales"."H_Sales".""."H_Sales"."Gen6,Location",4) = "Authorization".""."EDW"."T_EDW_MDM_STORE"."US_CODE", then drag the OPEN_DATE and CLOSE_DATE in relation DB to Location in ESSBASE in BMM,finially drag them into presentation layer.We create physical layer relationships, to send over the same relation to the underlying database during querying. So, creating a physical relationship between essbase cube and relation database would not help here.
When you set up this federation, BI Server sends individual queries to each source and maps the conforming dimension members internally.
Hope I was clear, and this helps.
Thank you,
Dhar

Output to input mapping between actions in Guided Procdure

Hi,
i had requirement to create process i.e. user request for group access to manager this one developed in Web dynpro.
I can able create initial screen in process i.e. display available groups in portal using table in this user can select required groups and click submit then request pass to manager for approval but i'm unable pass whatever groups selected by user to manager view means i didn't no how to map parameters user request view to manager approval view and also tell me once pass parameters to input of manager view how to read the list of input (here selected groups by user).
Please give me if u have any example url to explaining about mapping between list of output to list of input between actions of wd gp process.
reagrds,
Nari.

It is better to avoid more customization from maintainability point of view, if possible . Meaning I would try to make standard map as much as possible(less customization, no custom functoids, less customized xslt etc). Since your source xml format and
destination root is known, I can see your destination format is also known. Hence, you can copy the same schema format from source into destination with the root which you are referring as one element rather than just creating one element, To avoid all drawing
all lines manually, you can use "mass copy" functoid
to recursively copy all data in an input instance message, to arbitrary depth, that corresponds to a specified node in the source schema to the position in an output instance message that is specified by the output link. also refer
anytype with masscopy.
If you are just searching for a solution to pass raw xml, then I would go with your second approach already. You can also pass the output to external assembly to allow more flexibility in terms of coding if needed.
Please mark it as Answer if this answers your question
Thanks.
Mo
The contents I write here is my personal views, not the view of my employer and anyone else.

Display of relationships between nodes of multiple trees

Hello,
I am trying to develop a gui to display the relationship between multiple trees.
Tree1:------|---------------Tree2:----------------|--------Tree3:
------------|-------------------------------------|--------------
Root -------|----------------Root-----------------|--------Root
---Leaf1----|--------------------Node1------------|-----------LeafA
---Leaf2----|-----------------------Leaf11--------|-----------LeafB
---Leaf3----|-----------------------Leaf12--------|-----------LeafC
---Leaf4----|--------------------Node2
------------|-----------------------Leaf21
------------|-----------------------Leaf22
(The hyphens do not signifiy relationships, they are put there because the
preview takes away the blanks. The | characters are intended to act as separators
between adjacent trees.)
All the trees are scrollable and have been added to three different scrollpanes
and are displayed on a window. The relationships can only be between leaves
of the trees.
The only way I can figure out to show such relationships is by drawing lines
e.g. a line from Tree1.Leaf1 to Tree2.Leaf21 etc. Users may define relationships
by drawing lines from one tree node to another by dragging the mouse.
The lines may criss cross and there might be a lot of lines etc.
I would like to know about alternative ways to show such relationships on the
screen in a neater way.
I would also like a way to make lines "full fledged objects" e.g. they will get mouse
events such that actions can be triggered by double clicking or right clicking on a
line.
I would appreciate your help in this very much.
Best Regards,
Sandeepan

Joop Eggen and deriderj, thank you for your replies.
However, the JGraph framework is available only on Jsdk 1.4 and not on Jsdk 1.3.
I saw an item in the FAQ about the possibility of porting JGraph to 1.3 but there were
no links on the site for this.
I need to use Jsdk 1.3 as Jsdk1.4 is unsuported by the vendor of one of the tools that I need
to use and they do not have any plans to support 1.4 in the near future.
I would appreciate the forum's help in pointing out JGraph like functionality in Jsdk1.3 via some other API or maybe knowledge about whether someone has ported JGraph to Jsdk 1.3
Regards,
Sandeepan

What is the difference between Action & Workflow?

hi,
What is the difference between Action & Workflow?
regards,
babu

Hi,
Actions
Actions are important for maintaining and improving business relationships. You can schedule and start predefined processes with the Actions component by means of user-definable conditions from transaction and marketing objects.
You can tailor the type and time of actions to the requirements of your customers and the processes in your company. This component enables you to match your service, sales and distribution management, and your campaign management even more closely to customer needs, and, simultaneously, to automate them
In simple words Actions are automatic actions that are configured to occur in business transactions (activity, sales order, quotation etc.) as a result of particular condition like change of status to let us say "in process" from "open".
Workflow:
The automation of a business process, in whole or part, during which documents, information or tasks are passed from one participant* to another for action, according to a set of procedural rules.
*participant = resource (human or machine)
SAP Business Workflow is the R/3 tool for handling the process automation within R/3 or between R/3 systems and other systems involved in the business process. It is flexible enough to handle ad hoc processes such as the circulation of an electronic document. It is robust enough to handle mission critical process in the production system such as the creation of a material master.
The different R/3 applications supply standard workflows for the commonly occurring processes. Once these workflow templates are activated, they are ready for immediate use. A complete set of workflow tools, including the workflow editor and workflow generation wizard, are provided to enhance these standard workflows or create new workflows. These tools are complemented with transactions for monitoring, tracking and the statistical analysis of the processes.
Because the business process often does not step at the R/3 boundary, various interfaces and third party tools are available for extending the process across systems.

Relationship between groups and their members in LDAP directory missing

I use SAP EP 6 SPS14 with one LDAP Server as data source using this flat LDAP structure:
dn: dc=example,dc=com
objectClass: dcObject
objectClass: organization
dc: example
o: example.com
dn: ou=user,dc=example,dc=com
objectClass: organizationalUnit
description: All Users
ou: user
dn: cn=Max Mustermann,ou=user,dc=example,dc=com
objectClass: inetOrgPerson
objectClass: organizationalPerson
objectClass: person
objectClass: top
cn: Max Mustermann
givenName: Max
sn: Mustermann
uid: 0001
userPassword:: bWF4
dn: cn=Max Meier,ou=user,dc=example,dc=com
objectClass: inetOrgPerson
objectClass: organizationalPerson
objectClass: person
objectClass: top
cn: Max Meier
givenName: Max
sn: Meier
uid: 0002
userPassword:: bWF4
dn: ou=groups,dc=example,dc=com
objectClass: organizationalUnit
description: All Groups
ou: groups
dn: cn=internal,ou=groups,dc=example,dc=com
objectClass: groupOfNames
objectClass: top
cn: internal
member: uid=0001,ou=user,dc=example,dc=com
dn: cn=external,ou=groups,dc=example,dc=com
objectClass: groupOfNames
objectClass: top
cn: external
member: cn=Max Meier,ou=user,dc=example,dc=com
The private section of the LDAP entry in the dataSourceConfiguration.xml looks like:
<privateSection>
 <ume.ldap.access.server_type>openLDAP</ume.ldap.access.server_type>
 <ume.ldap.access.context_factory>com.sun.jndi.ldap.LdapCtxFactory</ume.ldap.access.context_factory>
 <ume.ldap.access.authentication>simple</ume.ldap.access.authentication>
 <ume.ldap.access.flat_group_hierachy>true</ume.ldap.access.flat_group_hierachy>
 <ume.ldap.access.user_as_account>true</ume.ldap.access.user_as_account>
 <ume.ldap.access.dynamic_groups>false</ume.ldap.access.dynamic_groups>
 <ume.ldap.access.ssl_socket_factory>com.sap.security.core.server.https.SecureConnectionFactory</ume.ldap.access.ssl_socket_factory>
 <ume.ldap.access.objectclass.user>inetOrgPerson</ume.ldap.access.objectclass.user>
 <ume.ldap.access.objectclass.uacc>inetOrgPerson</ume.ldap.access.objectclass.uacc>
 <ume.ldap.access.objectclass.grup>groupofnames</ume.ldap.access.objectclass.grup>
 <ume.ldap.access.naming_attribute.user>cn</ume.ldap.access.naming_attribute.user>
 <ume.ldap.access.auxiliary_naming_attribute.user>uid</ume.ldap.access.auxiliary_naming_attribute.user>
 <ume.ldap.access.naming_attribute.uacc>cn</ume.ldap.access.naming_attribute.uacc>
 <ume.ldap.access.auxiliary_naming_attribute.uacc>uid</ume.ldap.access.auxiliary_naming_attribute.uacc>
 <ume.ldap.access.naming_attribute.grup>cn</ume.ldap.access.naming_attribute.grup>
</privateSection>
The pointers in the portal are:
User Path: ou=user,dc=example,dc=com
Group Path: ou=groups,dc=example,dc=com
If I log in as SuperUser, all users and all groups of the LDAP directory are there and I could log on as one of the LDAP provided users. But the relationship between the users and the groups, defined in the member of the objectClass groupOfNames, is missing.
Whats wrong???
Message was edited by: Holger Wohlhüter

Meanwhile I changed the GroupOfNames to GroupOfUniqueNames in the LDAP structure and solved the problem. I had to add this line: <physicalAttribute name="null"/> in the User mappings.
<nameSpace name="com.sap.security.core.usermanagement.relation">
 <attributes>
 <attribute name="PRINCIPAL_RELATION_PARENT_ATTRIBUTE">
 <physicalAttribute name="*null*"></physicalAttribute>
 </attribute>
 </attributes>
</nameSpace>
Message was edited by: Holger Wohlhüter

Error while adding a used relationship between the New DC and the Web DC

Hi Gurus
We are getting the Error in NWDS while Adding a used relationship between the New DC and the Web DC.
Steps what we are Done
1. Create the custom project from inactiveDC's
2.creating the project for the component crm/b2b in SHRAPP_1
3.After that we changed the application.xml and given the contect path.
4.Then we tried to add Dependency to the custom create DC we are getting the error saying that illegal deppendency : the compartment sap.com_CUSTCRMPRJ_1 of DC sap.com/home/b2b_xyz(sap.com.CUSTCRMPRJ_1) must explicitly use compartment sap.com_SAP-SHRWEB_1 of DC sap.com/crm/isa/ like that it was throwing the error.
so, we skip this step and tried to create the build then it is saying that build is failed..
Please help us in this regard.
Awaiting for ur quick response...
Regards
Satish

Hi
Please Ignore my above message.
Thanks for ur Response.
After ur valuble inputs we have added the required dependencies and sucessfully created the projects, then building of the projects was also sucessfully done and EAR file was created.
We need to deploy this EAR file in CRM Application Server by using the interface NWDI.
For Deploying the EAR into NWDI, we need to check-in the activites what i have created for EAR. once i check-in the activites ,the NWDI will deploy the EAR into CRM Application Server.
In the Activity Log we are able to check the Activities as Suceeded but the Deployment column is not showing any status.
When i right click on my activity Id the deployment summery is also disabled.
So finally my Question is that where can i get the deployment log file, and where can i check the deployment status for my application..
Any pointers in this regard would be of great help..
Awaiting for ur valuble Responses..
Regards
Satish

1-to-1 Relationship Between UI and subVI Data Cluster

Discussion continued from here.
In summary:
JackDunaway wrote:
Yes,
I can see clear benefits in implementing this Idea - that is, if your
underlying datatype elements have a 1:1 relationship with the UI
elements.
I will
illustrate this point by showing some potential flaws in your example:
"Profile Running" and "Profile Complete" are mutually exclusive, no?
Wouldn't it be better to have a single enum named "Profile" with three
elements "Idle, Running, and Complete" for the underlying datatype?
Having two mutually exclusive pieces of data in an underlying datatype
is among my favorite of code smell indicators.
Also, the underlying datatype probably only needs "Forward Miles" and
"Reverse Miles" since "Total Miles" is derived. Exclude "Total Miles"
from the underlying cluster and just show the sum for display.
Another
argument against using a 1:1 relationship: the customer now wants to
multiply speed by -1 if Direction==Reverse and not show the Direction
enum on the UI. The data source (the VI that generates the data) would
need to be updated using your 1:1 relationship. Using underlying data
different from the display data, only the data client (the UI front
panel) needs to change. I would be much more inclined to service the UI
FP for a cosmetic upgrade rather than tracing the data source back
through the HMI framework, through TCP, back to the RT, back to FPGA...
Basically...
I question a perfectly overlapped Venn Diagram where the set of data
shown to the user equals the dataset used for underlying data
processing/messaging/storing. The underlying datatype should be as
stripped and streamlined as possible, while the display datatype can
inherit all the flair and post-processing that Upper Management wants to
see in a UI.
LabBEAN wrote:
<JackDunaway wrote
I will illustrate this point by showing some potential flaws in your example...
<LabBEAN response
The data you see maps directly to tags on the PLC.
<JackDunaway wrote
Yes, I can see clear benefits in implementing this Idea - that is, if your underlying datatype elements have a 1:1 relationship with the UI elements.
<LabBEAN response
JackDunaway wrote:
This is a good indicator that we're both aware at this point that I'm
missing something... in all seriousness, could you reply to the 1:1
argument? I really want to understand this Idea and learn how/if I need
to apply it to my own style (our last back-and-forth turned out to be an enlightening and introspective exercise for me).
***EDIT: By all means, please start a discussion on the LabVIEW board so we're not hindered by the Exchange's interface. ***
My long delayed response:
The indicators you see map to tags on the PLC. That is, we were connecting through OPC to an application on a PLC that was written ~15 years ago. I have a VI where I read a bunch of SVs (Shared Variables). Each SV is bound through OPC to a PLC tag. In the interest of disclosure, two 16-bit tags are required to represent each 32-bit mileage number. In the same subVI, I read each set of mileage tags, convert, and feed my subVI cluster indicator. The same is true for wheel size: three bits get converted to the enum. Regardless, though, I have one subVI that reads SVs and outputs the same "underlying data" cluster that is seen on the UI. The UI has a "Faults" cluster full of fault Booleans that follows the same logic. When the user configures a profile of steps, they do so via an array of "step" clusters (although the cluster look is hidden for aesthetics). It's the same thing as above except we write tags instead of reading them.
In my case, each set of 16-bit tags is worthless as two 16-bit numbers. They are only useful as a 32-bit mileage, so I don't pass around the raw 16-bit data. The same is true for the wheel size bits. My software can just as easily (in fact, more easily) operate on the enum. So, the underlying cluster from the subVI is programmatically useful and applicable to the UI. I would guess that the same is true for a lot of RT applications, where the read VI can have some intelligence to process the data into useful / applicable clusters.
There are going to be cases where "Upper Management" would like to see "flair and post-processing" as you say. Your speed illustration is a good example of this. There are also instances where the cluster works fine on the UI the way it is (like this one and many others that we've seen).
<JackDunaway wrote
"Profile Running" and "Profile Complete" are mutually exclusive, no?
Wouldn't it be better to have a single enum named "Profile" with three
elements "Idle, Running, and Complete" for the underlying datatype?
<LabBEAN response
Did you mean "not" mutually exclusive? We combined 3 "dependent" (not mutually exclusive) Booleans into an enum for Wheel Size, as I mentioned above. Not sure now why we went the other way with these two (this was 2 years ago). In any event, with regard to UI representation, I still pass a cluster out of my read-raw-data-and-process-into-cluster subVI up to the applicable queued state machines and to the UI.
<JackDunaway wrote
Having two mutually exclusive pieces of data in an underlying datatype
is among my favorite of code smell indicators.
<LabBEAN response
Working with applications written in ladder logic, it is not uncommon to see separate Booleans that indicate the same condition. This seems to be especially true when safety is a concern. That is, ladder Coil A ON and Coil B OFF == switch open. Coil A OFF and Coil B ON == switch closed. If you ever read OPC tags from Coil A and Coil B and the two are the same, you know the ladder is in transition (hasn't updated the tags). Throw that point out and read again.
I, too, appreciate our back-and-forths. Good discussion.
Certified LabVIEW Architect
Wait for Flag / Set Flag
Separate Views from Implementation for Strict Type Defs

Thanks for replying, Jason. Let me see if I can craft a coherent response after getting back up to speed...
(...later)
OK, let's go. I'm going to fully agree with you that LabVIEW imposes a strange constraint unique from most other languages where a Typedef defines two things: the underlying data structure, and also the view. A Strict Typedef should be more accurately deemed the Datatype-View-Definition, and a Typedef would be more accurately called the Datatype-Definition-and-View-Suggestion. And to be clear, there are two types of views: the programmer's view (a SubVI look and feel) and the UI view (what the user and Upper Management sees). (Finally, I admit I'm ignorant whether view or View is more a more appropriate term)
Linking the programmer's view to the datatype is perfectly fine with me, and based on your original Idea I think we both agree that's OK. I think we run into a disagreement where you have loosely tied the concept of "Strict TD" to "UI View".
Historically, I have used Strict Typedefs for the programmer's view (SubVIs), since I like to maintain a "functional UI" at the SubVI level. I don't use type definitions on User Interfaces - only Controls. That's the reason your Idea does not appeal to me, but perhaps if your Idea were implemented, it would appeal to me since View and Implementation would be divorced as separate entities within the Type Definition. (Does that classify as a Catch-22?) So, you're Idea is fundamentally suggesting that Type Definition .ctl files should be more accurately called "a container that holds both a Type Definition and any number of View Definitions as well".
Fundamentally, I think I finally understand the gist of your Idea: "let's ditch this weird constraint where View and Datatype are inextricably defined together in one file", and for that, I'll give Kudos to the original Idea. I got really tied up with the example you used to present the Idea, and plus I'm still learning a lot.
Additional thoughts:
This Idea reminds me of another: Tag XControl as Class View
We've still got some arguing to do on a 1:1 relationship between underlying datatype and UI presentation, so put your mean face back on:
Since our last conversation, interestingly, I have been on an anti-Typedef kick altogether. Why don't you drop some feedback on my attempt at a completely typedef-free UI framework?
a.lia-user-name-link[href="/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/88938"] {color: black;} a.lia-user-name-link[href="/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/88938"]:after {content: '';} .jrd-sig {height: 80px; overflow: visible;} .jrd-sig-deploy {float:left; opacity:0.2;} .jrd-sig-img {float:right; opacity:0.2;} .jrd-sig-img:hover {opacity:0.8;} .jrd-sig-deploy:hover {opacity:0.8;}

Extending DataFinder to include Non-Data Entries and Relationships Between Entries

I am trying to create custom data centralization and management software for our lab with DataFinder Toolkit. In addition to storing data from data acquisitions, I want to be able to store additional information with the data such as images, pdf files, word documents that can be easily accessed after finding the data. My current idea is to handle external files by storing the filepath in a property of an object vs trying to store the data itself in the datafinder database. My code would know how to open these files so the user can see them with external software or a custom labview app.
I also want to be able to store non-data objects such as an object that describes a piece of test equipment or a sample through properties and external files. Images and documents are again important here. And then create relationships through unique barcoded IDs that are a property in the datafinder entry. So not only could I look at the data, I could find information about the samples and lab equipment. Or anything else we think needs to be saved.
The code I am writing around DataFinder would be in charge of maintaining the unique IDs and know how the relationships between those IDs work to generate the proper queries. Like a 'Get Test Equipment Used' button next to a search result.
For the external non-data objects I was going to use Labview code to create a file with all the information about the object (unique ID, properties and external file paths) and create a plug-in so the datafinder will index the file and make it searchable.
Does this seem reasonable? I like the idea of working with one system and having everything update based on adding, deleting and modifying files in a folder. Also, I like the idea of not splitting the data management up into multiple technologies and having to make those work together.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

From the description, you've given the system seems plausible. The non-data elements you discussed when broken down are just additional data to associate with an object. Storing file paths seems plausible as done in the community example below:
Execute String/Numeric Querry Using Data Finder Toolkit
https://decibel.ni.com/content/docs/DOC-10631
Regards,
Isaac S.
Regards,
Isaac S.
Applications Engineer
National Instruments

Relationship between unknown SAP-TABLES

Hi Folks,
Lets take a scenario of populating an ouput internal table with fields from 4 unknown sap tables(relation between the tables is unknown). How can we check the relationship between those tables to populate the internal table..? What are the possible ways to check the relationship between tables..?
Can u please help me on this.
Thanks n regards,
ram.

Hi Ram,
 I tried the following method to find relation between tables and i think it is quite useful. I hope this will be of some use to you.
-> Goto SE11 and display one of the tables.
-> Click on the Graphic icon on the toolbar or use shortcut ctrlshiftF11
-> It displays all the related tables by foreign key and even gives you all check tables involved. If the list is a long one, you can even use Find option to check if the other tables you are trying to find relation with, exist in the screen.
 Hope this Helps!! Do get back!!
Regards,
Naveenan.

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN VBAK/VBAP AND V46R_HEAD TABLE

Hi,
can you please tell me that is there any relationship between VBAK and V46R_HEAD TABLE or VBAP and V46R_HEAD TABLE table.
where V46R_HEAD TABLE is a structure and i want to display sme fields of vbak and some of V46R_HEAD and some of VBAP.
I got the relation between VBAK and VBAP ie. the field VBELN. But i am not getting the relation with V46R_HEAD sturcture.
Please help me to solve this problem.

Hi,
the field vbeln is present in V46R_HEAD also.
Please check it!! Please do a CTR+F and look for VBELN.
Regards.

Relationship Between ECC Customers (Contact Persons) and CRM BP

Hello,
I am new to middleware and need some help with the relationship between ECC customers/contact persons and CRM business partners.
We are transferring via bdoc this information from ECC to CRM.
Which bdoc types are used when transferring customers/contact persons? I believe it is BUPA_MAIN but am not too sure. How is the relationship between customer its contact person transferred? Is this done through BUPA_REL? I looked at the segment fields in SBDM but am not too sure how to understand the relationship...
Thanks for the help!
Regards,
Tiffanie

Thanks! With the initial load, how do I check what fields are being passed in the bdocs?
I tried to look for customer_main, customer_rel in SBDM and couldn't find it. Instead I used BUPA_MAIN and found some segments but couldn't find all the data that was being transferred (e.g. customer name, address, etc...) Where do I find all the fields contained in the bdoc?
I see them in SMW01 when I view the bdoc contents but can not find the actual structure (data fields) that are being brought in from ECC.
Thanks!
Tiffanie

Portal : Relationship between Actions vs. Permission

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for