Ports blocked on the 1230's?

Please forgive me if this is posted in the wrong section, i am new to cisco products. I have a cisco 1230 wireless g AP that i have just configured with the basic settings, but its blocking some ports.
my basic network consists of a speedstream 4100 dsl modem with the ap plugged directly into it. ive talked with the telco about unblocking ports, however, they insist they are not blocking any ports what so ever. but when i try to connect through the ap to play a few games online, its showing the ports are blocked.
is there a setting or something im missing inside of the ap to prevent them from blocking the ports?
thank you for your kind advice!
James

sadly i dont have one, but i do have an allied telesysn hub i could put between them.
i have a cisco 837 id love to get programmed and installed instead of this dsl modem i have, but im afraid the 837 is way over my head! :(.
i will try putting the hub between the two and see if that improves. thank you for your reply! :)

Similar Messages

  • Some ports  randomly get blocked and the external program is unable to rece

    We have configured few ports to send out Idocs using TRFC mechanism. Initially all the ports are working fine and the external program  is able to receive Idocs from all the ports. However after sometime, some ports  randomly get blocked and the external program is unable to receive Idocs from these ports. If the SAP instance is restarted, we see that all ports work fine for a certain period but the same issue appears again after sometime.
    This behaviour is observed in case of TRFC calls but not for normal RFC calls.
    RFC Connections,partner profiles,ports,distribution model - these all are working fine.
    Your help will be appreciated.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Madhav

    Hi,
    The host serevr details may be changed. Please check with the respective team for the proper host details.
    Check this link. It may help:
    Re: Regarding Providing FTP connection from R/3
    Regards,
    Swarna Munukoti
    Edited by: Swarna Munukoti on Oct 16, 2009 8:17 AM

  • How do you create/add additional LAN IP blocks to the Westell A90-9100?

    I have a Linksys at home and the double NAT is killing me.  I'd prefer to add another IP block to the ethernet interface of the Westell, but it is not as cut and dry as the Linksys router I have.  Is there a way to do this, or am I stuck with the typical port-forwarding configs?  The devices I seem to have minor issues with are the media hub and the UMI telepresence.  They are functional, but some of the features are not working.  If there was only one device setup for NAT while routing IP addresses to the linksys that would work for me.
    Westell = 192.168.1.1
    Linksys E4200 = WAN: 192.168.1.254 and LAN 192.168.11.1 (NAT Enabled)
    I'd like to add a static route from the Westell to the Linksys and remove the NAT on the Linksys, but when I did so, all traffic was blocked at the Westell.  I tried RIP, but that did nothing for me.
    I'd prefer not to convert the E4200 into a switch due to the extra features on it like the USB port for an external drive.
    Any suggestions?
    Thanks

    I agree with the last suggestion. There's no need to have port forwarding rules in both the westell and linksys . So kill your port forwarding rules you made for.the linksys in the westell , assign the linksys a static ip and then dump it in the dmz. Then let the linksys handle all the port forwarding and additional ip blocks or VLANS

  • MiniDisplay Port and Thunderbolt - the same??

    I am looking for a cable to connect my Dell 19inch Monitor..
    I did use an Apple adaptor to DVI and a DVI cable to my Monitor from my i7 Apple Macbook Pro with Thunderbolt, but suddenly this has stopped working and the Monitor isn't recognised?
    I am now looking for a single cable which maybe easier but have been told by different sites and eBay sellers that Thunderbolt and MiniDisplay Port are the same and others that its NOT the same??!?
    My DVI cable had 2 sets of 9 pins in 2 blocks inside the cable end, was this a contributing factor? Do I need a DVI end cable (going into the Monitor) with a full set of pins on the end?
    As mentioned this DID work and when I use the same DVI cable to connect the same Monitor to a PC it works fine?
    I'm still guessing that it maybe the Apple Adaptor, but if i bought a brand new cable like this, maybe this should correct it - I just need to know if I should buy a "MiniDisplay Port" connector or "Thunderbolt" connector?
    http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=261009051009&ssPageName=ADM E:X:RTQ:GB:1123
    Thanks for any help

    The physical port is the same but the function is different and the same.
    The port on your mac can do both thunderbolt connections and mini displayport connections. But on older system with that same port they can only do the displayport part.
    As to why your monitor stopped being seen well that is just one of the apple mac os x glitches. For some reason apple really has not figured out how to do external monitors very well let alone dual monitors.
    Try shutting down completely, powering off. Then restart with the external monitor and tb to dvi adapter disconnected. Then connect the adapter and then the monitor. If that still doesn't work then you may have a bad adapter or a bad cable.

  • List of ports for all the WCI services

    I'm trying to figure out why collab cant talk to the CNS, and I see in the log:
    "Attempting to connect to teh notification server at host=blah (udp heartbeat port=28282 ..."
    aarg. where is the configuraiton for this? can't find it anywhere.
    Has anyone created a complete list of source - destination ports for all the new components?
    I"m going to start writing them down here:
    http://wiki.oracle.com/page/Webcenter+Interaction+Deployment

    Hi Joel,
    I have had a similar problem before but I am not sure if it is related to this, if you take a look inside the PTHOME/settings/configuration.xml file you will find some extra parameters which are not listed in the configuration manager for collab.
    I suggest trying some of these settings to see if they coincide with your issue. The problem I had before was when a port that was not even listed in the config manager was blocked by my firewall.

  • IPhone tethering to get around port blocking

    Hello all. My company/institution blocks imap port 993 so that email is not stored locally on company computers. (I find this unreasonable but it is their choice). However, sometimes I bring my laptop from home and wish to access my mail using Mac Mail. I can do so using my iPhone as a modem, however the sweet solution would be:
    - use company network for all requests except imap
    - use the iphone when accessing imap and other blocked ports
    This way i would not chew up my monthly data usage on the iphone, but be able to access blocked ports. Is there a good solution to do this other than manually connecting disconnecting the internet connections i.e. keep both lines open.
    Thank you.
    Message was edited by: patchling

    Well:
    a. It is my laptop
    b. I would not be using their network for downloading the imap data
    c. I would not be downloading the data onto their computers
    The policy is there to prevent imap downloading onto company computers, or more specifically through their network. As an unfortunate side-effect it prevents my computer from accessing imap email via the network. I am, however, allowed to hook up my lap top to the network.
    I would not be doing anything on their network. This is not a question of how to bypass their port blocking using funky ssh tunnels or the like. The question is how to run two internet connections at the one time (if possible), using one for the bulk of internet traffic and the other for connections disallowed by the first.
    The last paragraph of your response was useful and so I thank you for that. The 1st paragraph has nothing to do with what I am asking.

  • Port blocked prevents app from working

    Dear all,
    Although I don't even have ipfilters support compiled into my kernel, external attempts to connect to my tcp port 4662 fail. This happens although (locally) nmap shows it to be open:
    # nmap -sT -P0 -p 1-65535 localhost
    Starting nmap 3.81 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2005-05-03 23:40 EDT
    Interesting ports on thinkpad (127.0.0.1):
    (The 65533 ports scanned but not shown below are in state: closed)
    PORT     STATE SERVICE
    4662/tcp open  unknown
    6000/tcp open  X11
    Nmap finished: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 2.805 seconds
    However, it is impossible to connect from the internet to this port. Eg, I've used
    http://www.amule.org/testport.php?tcpport=4662
    and it always answers that the port is inacessible.
    Do you have any idea why this port might not be accessible on my machine? I am a residential cable customer, so I'm not behind a firewall.
    Thanks for any clue,
    Mack

    Actually a cable modem, acts as a router, as long as it has DHCP service in it, and im pretty sure its in NAT mode (so if you connect a switch to it, you can access internet from multiple PCs)...
    Arch has no port blocking per default that im aware of.
    EDIT:
    Also, as you see with nmap the port is open in your computer, but you cant reach it from internet because when you are behind a NAT you have to forward that port in the router/cablemodem/dslmodem to your PC IP and port. This was what i was talking in my first post. (Im quite sure about the cablemodem being in NAT mode and causing this problem, but i could be wrong, in my case, this was the problem (though i have DSL)).

  • Windows Server 2008 R2 ( USB Port Block)

    Dear Team,
    I need to create a policy to restrict the USB port for every domain user.
    Please guide in this regards,
    Regards, Ravi Kumar

    Hi ,
    You can create a group Policy say "USB port blocking" in your domain and this Policy will apply your domain all domain users will not able to access any removal drive. Open GPMC console then user configuration then administrative templates then
    system then removable storage access then select all removable storage access and enable it. Then go to command prompt and type gpupdate /force. 

  • E4200 - SIP ports blocked to/from Linksys SPA2102 VoIP ATA

    The E4200 seems to block UDP ports to/from a Linksys SPA2102 ATA VoIP adapter.  I tried enabling SIP ALG and still lost dial tone by morning. I tried looking at the Admin logs to see which inbound / outbound ports are being blocked but the log functions on this router only seems to display outbound information with no specifics as to what ports or protocols are being blocked by the E4200.
    Does anyone on this forum know what configurations to change on the E4200 to allow the transparent operation of the SPA2102 VoIP ATA behind it?
    Any hope Cisco will fix the log functions to display useable and meaningful information needed to setup Application specific configurations?

     macthelion,
    All new Small Business discussions (which includes the adapter you mentioned) have migrated to the Cisco Small Business Support Community.
    All existing Small Business discussions have been archived here for
    reference.  We have made these changes to best serve all Cisco customers
    now and in the future. 
    Please visit the Cisco Small Business Support Community Welcome Page created specifically for Linksys and Linksys by Cisco community members.
    Thank you!

  • Wrt54gs port blocking

    my wrt54gs is blocking ports and idk how to stop it.
    I can't connect to ftp
    I can't connect to sites using abnormal ports such as 8008.
    (surprised how many sites use different ports)
    wireless or wired.
    If i reboot the router it lets me get to them for the first like 15 seconds then its blocked again....
    I even placed my computer in the DMZ
    I even factory reset
    I even upgraded the firmware

    Another thing to check would be the firewall software running on your computer.   I have had problems where when you let the  subscription to updates expire, the firewall software reverts to a very locked down state.
    Out of the box, a WRT blocks almost nothing.  If you had configured it to do some port blocking, you would know about it.
    And just to eliminate the stupid stuff -- be sure the cable/DSL modem is plugged into the "Internet" port and not one of the numbered LAN ports.

  • Port Blocked on Structural Exception

    Hi All,
    I am facing one issue in which Inbound Port for auto imports is getting blocked.
    Error message in the logs is "CR: 0x80010000 Out of Memory".
    Can anyone please throw some light regarding this message and let me know what this means?
    This is a Verbose message and setting 0x800 is used for keeping track of ImportX.
    Then why is the port blocked on Structural Exception?
    Thank You.

    Hi Ankush,
    It seems there is a high load on MDS causing the first error.
    Try connecting through IM manually for the same record.
    Also,if there is high data influx it is advisable to optimise port and MDIS parameters accordingly.
    I did not get what is your second question but if you are asking why does the port block on structural Exception,then thats a setting which you can or not.But i have seen having exceptions in StrucX badly affects import process.
    Also error  0x800 is also related to server being very busy,that may be the case here.
    Thanks,
    Ravi

  • Port block on comcast firewall

    I am trying to connect to tcp 32400, it is blocked on the WAN side, can you please open this port for me, also i may need other ports as well, can you open all port except for typical vunerability ports. 

    sd2013 wrote:
    Listed/published comcast blocked ports does not seems true story. I have Pfsense router/firewall and my modem is in bridge mode and i have configured port forwarding on my router but it is blocked by the comcast fireway gateway it seems like it. My port in question is tcp 32400. So for i am failed to talk to support personal Comcast who really understand my issue.
    There are a couple of possibilities...
    If the gateway is bridged properly, then it should act as a bridge, with no firewall active, so all traffic should be passed to your router WAN interface, with the exception of that listed on the 'blocked ports' site. Those ports are blocked within the Comcast network so inbound traffic on the blocked ports should never even reach your modem. The problem with the Comcast gateways is that while they are supposed to go into bridge mode, we have seen enough reports of strange behavior with a variety of functions, that it is possible that full bridge functionality doesn't work properly. There are a lot of reports of issues with port forwarding while they are in gateway mode, so it's possible bridge mode doesn't really 'bridge'.
    How are you testing your port forwarding? Does the pfSense router support NAT loopback? If not, you cannot test connections to external sockets from within your own LAN.

  • Port Blocker..Help

    Dear All,
    i'm new in socket programming and i want to block my browser to browse for the internet, but i still want my antivirus ability to auto update their virus database..and i think i just block the port 80 for the www..my question is:
    1. is this the right forum for me to ask a question and discuss about this port blocker?
    2. what should i do to make this port blocker program?

    1. is this the right forumNo. Locking this thread.

  • This message has been blocked because the HELO/EHLO domain is invalid

    Hi friends,
     We are using cisco ironport c170. Today we cannot send email for particular email id(domain). the error msg as below,
    Diagnostic information for administrators:
    Generating server: sgm.svc.com.sg
    [email protected]
    [182.**.**.51] #<[182.**.**.51] #5.0.0 smtp; 5.1.0 - Unknown address error 554-'5.7.1 [SPAM] This message
    has been blocked because the HELO/EHLO domain is invalid.' (delivery attempts: 0)> #SMTP#
    Original message headers:
    X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,682,1389715200";
    d="scan'208,217";a="3362301"
    Received: from abcct01.abc.com ([10.**.**.33]) by
    sgm.svc.com.sg with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 19 Mar 2014 11:17:45 +0800
    Received: from abcMB01.abc.com ([fe80::99bb:22a0:nnaa:25cc]) by
    abcCT01.abc.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 19 Mar
    2014 11:18:13 +0800
    From: "test" <[email protected]>
    To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
    Subject: Testing Email
    Thread-Topic: Testing Email
    Thread-Index: Ac9DIdjTsP9HUS2QTF6cZp6PKztE8g==
    Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 03:18:12 +0000
    Message-ID: <[email protected]>
    Accept-Language: en-US
    Content-Language: en-US
    X-MS-Has-Attach:
    X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
    x-originating-ip: [10.**.**.210]
    Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
    boundary="_000_1329D1768D6FBE4A90657F034B26A7E217D7ADD5abcMB01_"
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Thank you.

    The HELO/EHLO domain that your Cisco IronPort Email Security Appliance (ESA) uses is based on the hostname you configure for your delivery interface under Network -> IP Interfaces.  Please ensure that a valid hostname is configured.  This hostname should match the rDNS records for the public IP address used by your ESA.
    Once addressed - you should be able to take the domain in question, and attempt to telnet port 25, and attempt the standard SMTP testing...
    $ telnet mail.test.com 25
    Trying XYZ.XY.124.XX...
    Connected to mail.test.com.
    Escape character is '^]'.
    220 mail.test.com ESMTP
    helo foo.com
    250 mail.test.com
    mail from: [email protected]
    250 sender <[email protected]> ok
    rcpt to: [email protected]
    250 recipient <[email protected]> ok
    data
    354 go ahead
    Subject: Test
    TESTING
    250 ok:  Message 8102 accepted
    I hope this helps!
    -Robert
    (*If you have received the answer to your original question, and found this helpful/correct - please mark the question as answered, and be sure to leave a rating to reflect!)

  • Carrier grade nat - static port block allocation.

    Hello,
    Is it possible to configure nat (cgn) on ASR 1k to permit the same private address always  get the same port block allocation from the same public address? With that You dont need nat logging.
    regards

    ADAM619,
    At the moment we're unable to answer these questions.  When we have more information we will provide it here in the forums, and make it available at www.verizon.com.  Thanks for your patience during this transition. ~Ian
    Ian_VZ
    Verizon Support
    Notice: Content posted by Verizon employees is meant to be informational and does not supersede or change the Verizon Forums User Guidelines or Terms or Service, or your Customer Agreement Terms and Conditions or Plan.

Maybe you are looking for