Portuguise sort order in Index

There are one Grouptitle (Â) in the index in FrameMaker, that is do not work properly, when I generate the Index automatically. What I do wrong?
Symbols[\ ];Numerics[0];A;Á;Â;À;Ã;B;C;Ç;D;E;É;Ê;F;G;H;I;Í;J;K;L;M;N;O;Ò;Ó;Ô;Õ;P;Q;R;S;T;U;Ú;Ü;V;W;X ;Y;Z
<$symbols><$numerics><$alphabetics>Aa Áá Ââ Àà Ãã Bb Cc Çç Dd Ee *Éé* *Êê* Ff Gg Hh Ii *Íí* Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo *Òò* *Óó* *Ôô* *Õõ* Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu *Úú* *Üü* Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz

graphisoft,
I assume you have to remove "<$alphabetics>" from your SortOrder paragraph. AFAIK it is either <$alphabetics> or you give the sort order manually. I am confused by the "*Éé*" in your sort order. I assume that each letter is supposed to appear only once within a sort order.
- Michael

Similar Messages

Word-by-word sort order in indexes

Hi again,
I need to change the sort order in my indexes from letter-by-letter to word-by word.
According to the help file,
1. Choose View > Reference Pages, and display the reference page that contains the special text flow for the index.
2. Add a space at the beginning of the IgnoreChars paragraph in the special text flow of the index. (The space cannot be at the end of the paragraph.)
The *IgnoreCharsIOM paragraph in the IOM flow contains "-_–—[»–«»". Try as I might, I cannot add a space at the beginning. If I add a space after the initial dash, then put a dash afterwards, and then get rid of the first dash (to move the space to the beginning) the space gets removed.
I presume I'm misunderstanding the instructions.... Can anyone help?
Thanks
KF

Hi again,
I need to change the sort order in my indexes from letter-by-letter to word-by word.
According to the help file,
1. Choose View > Reference Pages, and display the reference page that contains the special text flow for the index.
2. Add a space at the beginning of the IgnoreChars paragraph in the special text flow of the index. (The space cannot be at the end of the paragraph.)
The *IgnoreCharsIOM paragraph in the IOM flow contains "-_–—[»–«»". Try as I might, I cannot add a space at the beginning. If I add a space after the initial dash, then put a dash afterwards, and then get rid of the first dash (to move the space to the beginning) the space gets removed.
I presume I'm misunderstanding the instructions.... Can anyone help?
Thanks
KF

Index sort order with underscore (_)

Hi.
According to the documentation, the default sort order for indexes is <$symbols><$numbers><$alphabetics> with hyphens, nonbreaking hyphens, en dashes, and em dashes ignored by default. Nothing about underscores, so they should be sorted on first, right? But they are not in my document. Example:
PaymentModule_Order_Head
PaymentModule_OrderPayment_Capture
PaymentModule_Order_Tabs
What I want to see is:
PaymentModule_Order_Head
PaymentModule_Order_Tabs
PaymentModule_OrderPayment_Capture
Is there an easy way to fix this so underscores have precedence over alphabetics? I've tried rearranging the building blocks every which way but nothing seems to work.

> ... going through thousands of index entries and adding the sort order text.
That could be scripted, using dedicated Frame scripting tools, or, with MIF, ordinary text processing tools. Someone may even have done it already.
In MIF, it would "merely" be a matter of first batch converting all:
<MTypeName `Index'>
<MText `what appears in Index'>
pairs to:
<MTypeName `Index'>
<MText `what appears in Index[M00what appears in Index]'>
then hand edit only the Markers of the outliers to change the arbitrary "M00" prefix to whatever is needed to optimize the sort rank.
> FrameMaker is not behaving has doc'd here.
You have documentation for FrameMaker?
Why wasn't I told about this?

How to show the columns (and sequence and sort order) of an INDEX?

Assume I have an INDEX for an existing TABLE.
How can I find out the columns covered by this INDEX (and the sequence and sort order)?
Which table contains this information?
all_indexes does not.
Peter

user559463 wrote:
Assume I have an INDEX for an existing TABLE.
How can I find out the columns covered by this INDEX (and the sequence and sort order)?
Which table contains this information?
all_indexes does not.
Peter--
select table_name, index_name, column_name, column_position
from user_ind_columns
order by table_name, index_name, column_position;

Russian and English combined Index Group Title and sort order

How should I create the combined index Group Title and sort order in Russian and Greek documentations?

The final product one Russian manual which contains some English Index marker ...
And what is the problem?
You can control the sorting by placing a [...] tag in the Marker Text, such as:
[Сплайн] Spline
The term(s) in the brackets are used only for sort. What appears in the Index is the following text.
Or you can just edit the Marker Text.
But it sounds like there might be more than one question here, re: Group Titles.

Site Index Tree (SIP) portlet / sort order of entries

How can I change the (alphabetical) sort order in the site index portlet to something else?
Thanks,
Frank

Unfortunatelly, it does not work.
What happens instead?
Let's check some background information:
What version of Frame, on what operating system ?
(there's some chance of Unicode issues here)
This document is a book ?
The body files of this book were created in the same version of Frame you are using to update it ?
This book has an separate index file xyzzyIX.fm ?
This file is generated (book menu, Edit > Update Book) ?
The content and formatting of this index is correct other than sort order ?

Sorting Order for SAP Tables in DB2 database

Dear Experts -
ISSUE: When an ABAP program selects data from the DB into an internal
table, it is changing the way the data is sorted. In other words, the
internal table data is in a different sort order than what is in the
DB. It is not working this way in all other non-production systems
(DEV, QAS, SAX, etc).
Temporary solution for the programs that have been identified as
impacted: Use the ABAP Command 'sort' on the internal table.
Permanent solution needed : Since it is impossible to identify all
of the programs that will be impacted, we need PRD to work like DEV,
QAS, SAX, etc. when selecting data into internal tables. The data
should be in the same order as it is in the DB (sorted by the key).
ADDITIONAL INFO: DB2 storage disks crashed a day before. H/W team recovered everything. We are facing this only after the recovery.
Thanks,
Dinesh

can you please check in your code if the sql that is being sent has an order by clause .
Please let us know the SQL statements that is basically used to fill up the internal table.
When data is fetched from the database, it is not sorted always. Probably you had a clustered index on the tables and the clustering is not there now.
Edited by: Ratnajit Dey on Dec 16, 2011 1:56 PM

Accessing the records in ascending order using index hint

I am getting a problem in selecting the rows using the index hint which in i want to query in the ascending order.
for eg.
select /*+ index(temp_itr_header,tmp_itrhdr_1#IDX2) */ person_id
from temp_itr_header

Oracle knows that it doesn't have to resort data if it accessed individual rows from an index with the same sort order. In other words, adding the ORDER BY clause need not cause Oracle to do any extra work. Adding the ORDER BY does guarantee that the results will be sorted and will tend to cause Oracle to use the index, assuming it can avoid the sort that way. If you don't have an ORDER BY, Oracle is free to return rows in whatever order it would like regardless of your hint.
If you want to use the index hint, the syntax is
SELECT /*+ INDEX(temp_itr_header <<index name>>) */Note that you do not want to have a comma in your hint. Of course, if your statistics are accurate, you shouldn't need to resort to a hint here-- the CBO should pick the most efficient path.
Justin
Distributed Database Consulting, Inc.
http://www.ddbcinc.com/askDDBC

How to change the sort order of complex table in drop down

Hi Team,
I have a complex table which is working but the sort order i want in a different way. How can i change?
Regards,
Gupta

Gupta,
My screen field definitions are as follows:
1. Location
2. Partner
--In my previous reply, the first screen shot is without any parent index. So it is giving all values in alphabetical order only.
--After that I created parent index for partner with location, So the partner values are depend on location chosen.
In my TEST1:
--I just selected "Andhra pradesh" as location, In partner field drop down it is showing "Ragava" "Suman" "Sunitha" only.
--Because these are only the values belong to "andhra pradesh" location and these are coming in alphabetical order only.
TEST2:
--Here I selected "Gujrat" as location, In partner field drop down it is showing "Avinash" "Mohan" "Suman" which are belong to "Gujrat" location, These are also in alphabetical order only.
Hope this clears now. Still any query please post.
Thanks,
Swaroopa.

Frustrated and seeking help with a custom sort order...

I created a family photo album and arranged all of the pictures in a specific order and sync'd them with my iPad, unfortunately the pictures do not stay in the custom sequence.
I tried Batch renaming with a Custom Name and Index, but the renaming is applied to the pictures based on the date they were created and not by the way I have arranged them.
Is there a solution to my problem?
TIA

I flagged fifty photos and from that selection I created an album. I went to the album and dragged the photos in to the order I wanted them to appear after selecting Manual. Each time I now choose the manual option it arranges the photos into the sequence I created.
The problem I'm having is that when I synchronize my iPad with iTunes the photos revert back to their original sort order, which is the default date they were brought in to Aperture.
As I said, I tried to give them new names and index numbers using a batch command AFTER I arranged them manually, which works, however the names are assigned to the photos sequentially starting with oldest photos and not to photos as I have arranged them.
Honestly, it would be easier for me to create a slideshow using the timeline in FCP, but a video is not what I'm after.
I hope I have answered your questions.
TIA

Specifying alphabetic sort order for other languages.

The alphabetic sort order differs slightly for other languages then the English one. I rewrite the alphabetics in the special text flow of the Reference Page of the index file, regenerate the index file, but the result is wrong. The special Group Title characters for greek, hungarian, czech, russian etc. languages are combined among latin Group Title characters.
We work in FM 8 to create 3000 pages technical documentation in 14 languages. The output will be pdf file and help system. Our main problem now the index Group Titles sort order. Could you help me to solve this problem?
Thank you so much
Eva

Michael,
Thank you so much for your answer. It works great. I have a promlem only one letter, which is in the Czech alphabetics: "Ch". This letter would be after the "H". I have edited the sort order like this:
Symbols[\ ];Numerics[0];A;B;C;Č;D;E;F;G;H;Chch;I;J;K;L;M;N;O;P;Q;R;Ř;S;Š;T;U;Ú;V;W;X;Y;Z
<$symbols><$numerics>Aa Bb Cc *Čč* Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Chch Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Řř Ss Šš Tt Uu Úú Vv Ww Xx Zz
The result in the generated index is, that the index entries beginning with Ch comes on below "C" and the GroupTitle "Ch" is disappearing. Take a look at the result in the generated index file, what I am talking about:

Sort order for Simplified Chinese (pinyin)

FrameMaker 10 (Windows)
It seems that if I specify the sort order for Simplified Chinese (pinyin) on the reference page,
index entries that start with "i" and "v" are not shown under their corresponding group titles.
(I assume that this may be due to the fact that pinyin words never start with these letters.)
If I have an entry that starts with an English word like "IP," it appears under the "J" group.
I want the entry to appear under the "I" group. How can I do this?
I have the IX reference page set up as follows:
GroupTitlesIX paragraph
Symbols[\];Numerics[0];A;B;C;D;E;F;G;H;I;J;K;L;M;N;O;P;Q;R;S;T;U;V;W;X;Y;Z;
SortOrderIX paragraph
<$symbols><$numerics><$alphabetics><$pinyin>
I've also tried:
SortOrderIX paragraph
<$symbols><$numerics><$pinyin>
Thanks in advance.
Tak Osato

I sort of found a workaround, but it may lead to other problems, so use it at your own risk.
It also requires a bit of work.
The idea is to use the sort order for Japanese by specifying the following in the IX reference page.
Symbols[\ ];数字[0];A;B;C;D;E;F;G;H;I;J;K;L;M;N;O;P;Q;R;S;T;U;V;W;X;Y;Z;あ;い;う;え;お;か;き;く;け;こ;さ;し;す;せ;そ ;た;ち;つ;て;と;な;に;ぬ;ね;の;は;ひ;ふ;へ;ほ;ま;み;む;め;も;や;ゆ;よ;ら;り;る;れ;ろ;わ;ん;[　]
<$symbols><$numerics><$alphabetics><$kana>
Then, you need to capitalize the first letter in the bracket used for sorting for every index entry.
Example:
Instead of
画面[hua4mian4]
specify
画面[Hua4mian4]
Now, I'm wondering if there is a way to do a search and replace on all index entries to capitalize the first letter...

How to hint hash join order on indexes ?

Hi,
in my 9.2.0.8 DB I've got query like this:
SELECT COUNT (agreementno) cnt
FROM followup
WHERE agreementno = :v001 AND actioncode = :v002 AND resultcode = :v003;
Plan
SELECT STATEMENT CHOOSECost: 11 Bytes: 18 Cardinality: 1
     5 SORT AGGREGATE Bytes: 18 Cardinality: 1
          4 VIEW index$_join$_001 Cost: 11 Bytes: 18 Cardinality: 1
               3 HASH JOIN Bytes: 18 Cardinality: 1
                    1 INDEX RANGE SCAN NON-UNIQUE IDX_FOLLOWUP06 Cost: 13 Bytes: 18 Cardinality: 1
                    2 INDEX RANGE SCAN UNIQUE PK_FOLLOWUP Cost: 13 Bytes: 18 Cardinality: 1 I need to change join order of indexes, so the proble one would be PK_FOLLOWUP .
Of course the best plan is index range scan on pk but during to hight CF Oracle is combining 2 indexes .
Regards.
Greg

Hmm sorry for red-herring.
I guess you could also consider hand-coding the index join, something like:
SELECT /*+ ORDERED USE_HASH (b) */
       COUNT (a.empno)
FROM (SELECT e.empno
       FROM emp e
       WHERE e.empno > 7000) a,
      (SELECT e.empno
       FROM emp e
       WHERE e.ename LIKE 'S%') b
WHERE a.ROWID = b.ROWID;or...
WITH e AS
     (SELECT e.empno, e.ename
        FROM emp e)
SELECT /*+ ORDERED USE_HASH (b) */
       COUNT (a.empno)
FROM   e a, e b
WHERE b.ename LIKE 'S%'
AND    a.empno > 7000
AND    a.ROWID = b.ROWID;

Are the database tables stored in a sorted order?

Hi-
Are the records in a databse table stored in a sorted order based on key fields??
Thanks.
Ramesh.

A,
Unfortunately, this is not a clearly or fully explained concept in the BC400 class.
As stated in the course text, the ITAB will have the "order" of the DB table.
This may or may not be in actual key order. It depends on whether or not the primary key index is ALWAYS kept up to date / ordered by your DBAs.
This is rarely done as it is very "expensive" to the system... vitually impossible to be truthful.
Because of this, you can never GUARANTEE in a Production system that all records are stored in a primary key order. To guarantee ordering, you must FORCE the system to order the result set through:
ORDER BY
or
SORT after the database retrieval is completed and the result set is returned to the App server

Comm: file 1 is not in sorted order?

For example:
==> Tidying install...
-> Removing doc files...
-> Purging unwanted files...
-> Compressing man and info pages...
-> Removing libtool files...
-> Removing empty directories...
==> Creating package...
-> Generating .PKGINFO file...
-> Adding install file...
-> Compressing package...
==> Leaving fakeroot environment.
==> Finished making: linux-BFS 3.2.5-100 (Mon Feb 6 21:11:21 PST 2012)
comm: file 1 is not in sorted order
comm: file 2 is not in sorted order
comm: file 1 is not in sorted order
comm: file 2 is not in sorted order
==> ERROR: An unknown error has occurred. Exiting...
==> Removing installed dependencies...
Have seen the comm: error a few times lately. Apps appear to install without issue, what is the comm referencing?

See e.g. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pa … base_group
Both inputs have to be sorted before feeding them to comm:
comm -23 <(pacman -Qeq|sort) ...
and not just
comm -23 <(pacman -Qeq) ...

Portuguise sort order in Index

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for