Position Hierarchy Diagram

Dear All
We are upgrading from Oracle 11.0.3 to R12. The Organization Diagram is working fine.But the Position Hierarchy Diagram is empty. The position hierarchy is set properly.
In the Job window nothing is updated in front end, but there are 32 records in per_jobs table. Because of this, In assignment window job LOV is empty and in the position table job is empty.
Is this could be a reason of the position hierarchy diagram empty.
Thanks in advance
Regards
Nakshathra

-- Diagrammer Window shows Blank, even if the Position Heriarchy set correctly----
Hi,
Currently we have a SR(TAR) pending from oracle regarding the same issue as we have upgraded from 11.5.10.2 Family pack k rollup 1 to Family Pack K rollup 2.
Oracle has identified this as a bug and assigned to their development team.
Regards,
Naga

Similar Messages

  • Orgchart 3.0 doesn't show position hierarchy/detail due to (error) message?

    Hi all,
    at the moment we're implementing orgchart 3.0 (Product Version:7.0 Build Version:0700038500)
    When using the wizard for setting the position view and details under organizational unit it provides the following
    message/warning on the "profile"step as shown in the below link.
    http://dc459.4shared.com/img/EW1Zf8-Y/s7/0.7417648190801285/screencap.PNG
    This results in missing details for positions when publishing the build.
    All the transports (ABAP and add on package have been imported and all included tables, views fm's are available.
    Included an error log which is related to this issue?
    697. 29 nov 2011 15:45:20 ERROR com.nakisa.Logger - com.nakisa.integration.sap.BuildingBlocks : while trying to invoke the method org.w3c.dom.Node.getNodeType() of an object loaded from local variable 'node'
    698. 29 nov 2011 15:45:20 ERROR com.nakisa.Logger - java.lang.NullPointerException: while trying to invoke the method org.w3c.dom.Node.getNodeType() of an object loaded from local variable 'node'
    699. 29 nov 2011 15:45:20 ERROR com.nakisa.Logger - Nakisa.SAP.SAPProcessor.BAPI_Hroci : while trying to invoke the method com.nakisa.framework.data.DataTable.select(java.lang.String) of an object loaded from local variable '<6>'
    700. 29 nov 2011 15:45:20 ERROR com.nakisa.Logger - java.lang.NullPointerException: while trying to invoke the method com.nakisa.framework.data.DataTable.select(java.lang.String) of an object loaded from local variable '<6>'
    The orgchart can be accessed and a structure is show on O level
    but when trying to get in depth on position hierarchy we dont see any details or structure.
    Any idea what might be the problem/issue and how to solve this?
    Thanks in advance
    Carlos

    Luke,
    thanks for your helpful and quick response.
    Still have some additional questions/queries:-) as this is the first time we
    try to implement orgchart.
    So if I'm correct we need to undeploy the current SMP build of Nakisa 3.0
    and deploy the latest build with SP2?
    Or can we just deploy the latest build on our NWCE without any issues?
    Regarding the 3.0 SP2 is this included in the latest build or do we need to download thisseperate from the SMP?
    Can we resuse the current orgchart config builds in the latest build or is it advisable to configure
    orgchart with a clean build?
    Thanks in advance
    Regards,
    Carlos
    Hi Carlos,
    You are using the SMP build which contains quite a few bugs. I highly recommend that you contact SAP Support for the latest version and I strongly recommend that you implement 3.0 SP2 (the build you have deployed is 3.0 without any SPs). SAP Support will supply the latest version of the build upon request.
    Best regards,
    Luke

  • How to use position hierarchy for approval in custom workflow ?

    Dear All,
    I have created a custom workflow which fires when ever a new supplier site is created.
    Now I want to add approval hierarchy in this flow. For that I want to use Position Hierarchy.
    I have not find useful resources for doing that. Can you please help me?
    Regards,
    Rubayat

    Hi;
    Please review:
    How to Create a New Position Hierarchy [ID 437489.1]
    Adding Positions to a Hierarchy from Another Business Group [ID 356127.1]
    How To Determine Position Controlled Organizations In The Hierarchy? [ID 549628.1]
    How Does One Create and/or Update Position and Position Hierarchy in HR Using an API? [ID 736443.1]
    Using AME, How To Create Approval Routing To a Certain Position In HR Position Hierarchy [ID 1501433.1]
    Regard
    Helios

  • Images not appearing in Nakisa Org Hierarchy or Position Hierarchy

    Hi,
    I have configured Nakisa Org Structure to show photos of a few employees. The photos have been saved in the images/Portraits folder and are of the same size as the rest of the photos in this area. I have also pointed Nakisa Images to this folder in the Application wide setting. Also, I have used the Details Designer in OrgChart--> Position and edited the Images section to point to EmpDetails2 --> Personnel Number. I have also ensured that the photos have been saved as Personnel Number.jpg. Also, in the Position Hierarchy, I have done a similar mapping.
    However, the photos are still not appearing despite having published the Org Chart several times.
    I would really aprpeciate a quick response from you.
    Thanks,
    Vibhu

    Hi Vibhu,
    Have you checked the XSL files that control the images? I believe they are EmployeePictureXSL.xsl and EmployeePictureCondensedXSL.xsl. You might need to amend them to fit your solution.
    I hope that helps.
    Luke

  • Unable to create position hierarchy in organization model

    I was unable to create position hierarchy in organizational hierarchy. I want to maintain position hierarchy within an organization. But SAP CRM is not allowing that. I was able to create organizational hierarchy. Please let me know, how can I maintain the position hierarchy within the same organization?
    --hari

    Hi hari,
    it is only possible to have a hierarchy with two levels on position level. Therefore you create two positions below your organization (tx ppoma_crm). At one of these positions you set the flag "Head of own organizational unit" at the Basic data tab of the position (To see this, you need to display the Details of the positions at the bottom of the screen). Now you can assign a business partner (or more)  to this position which is (are)  the Head of this unit.
    If you need a more complex hierarchy you have to use organizations to show this.
    Hope it helps!
    Kind regards
    Christian

  • Query for Position Hierarchy

    Hi friends,
    I need urgent help. I have tried that Position Hierarchy query. If i give Bottom position id and Top position id , it should display that particular root only.
    This is my query.
    SELECT posname, subordinate_position_id, parent_position_id
    FROM (
    SELECT SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH (pse.subordinate_position_id, '/') posname,
    pse.subordinate_position_id, parent_position_id
    FROM (SELECT NAME, position_id
    FROM hr_all_positions_f_tl
    WHERE LANGUAGE = USERENV ('LANG')) hap,
    (SELECT NAME, position_id
    FROM hr_all_positions_f_tl
    WHERE LANGUAGE = USERENV ('LANG')) has,
    per_pos_structure_elements pse
    WHERE pse.business_group_id = 0
    AND hap.position_id = pse.parent_position_id
    AND has.position_id = pse.subordinate_position_id
    START WITH pse.parent_position_id = 63--:parent_posid
    CONNECT BY PRIOR pse.subordinate_position_id = pse.parent_position_id
    AND PRIOR pse.pos_structure_version_id = pse.pos_structure_version_id
    WHERE subordinate_position_id = 362--:subposid
    Output coming like this :
    Posname SUBORDINATE_POSITION_ID                 PARENT_POSITION_ID
    /81/55/161/135/188/141/101/362 *362 101*
    It returns one row only
    i need Like this
    subordinate positiond_id Parent_position_id
    362 101
    101 141
    141 188
    188 135
    135 161
    161 55
    55 81
    81 63.
    How to achieve this.. Please help.
    Thanks in advance.
    Kavi

    Try this
    SELECT null posname, subordinate_position_id, parent_position_id, level_num
    FROM (
    SELECT distinct
    --SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH (pse.subordinate_position_id, '/') posname, --uncomment this line if necessary
    level level_num,
    pse.subordinate_position_id, parent_position_id
    FROM (SELECT NAME, position_id
    FROM hr_all_positions_f_tl
    WHERE LANGUAGE = USERENV ('LANG')) hap,
    (SELECT NAME, position_id
    FROM hr_all_positions_f_tl
    WHERE LANGUAGE = USERENV ('LANG')) has,
    per_pos_structure_elements pse
    WHERE pse.business_group_id = 0
    AND hap.position_id = pse.parent_position_id
    AND has.position_id = pse.subordinate_position_id
    START WITH pse.parent_position_id = 63--:parent_posid
    CONNECT BY PRIOR pse.subordinate_position_id = pse.parent_position_id
    AND PRIOR pse.pos_structure_version_id = pse.pos_structure_version_id
    WHERE subordinate_position_id = 362--:subposid
    order by level_numMake sure that the you are using the correct values for the 3 IDs.
    Hope this helps,
    Sandeep Gandhi

  • (urgent) Position Hierarchy and PO approval...

    Hi,
    We have re-engineered the current Position and Job Flexfield set-up, basically an additional segment in the Position FF and hiding a segment in Job FF. Adn the employee will be assigned to a one level high in the organization. So basically, employee will be assigned to a new org as well.
    Due to the changes, all employees will be moved to a new position. Now since client is utilizing the Position Hierarchy, I would like to know if we
    need to approved all the outstanding PO that requires approval, before moving the employees to the new assignment?
    If we dont do that, will there be any implications or will it cause any problems moving forward.
    Another question is, is it necessary to approved all the PO before changing all the employee assignment???
    Your response will be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks..

    PO Approval workflow is highly sensitive to changes while workflows are in progress. Remember workflow is versioned, so if you make changes to the workflow itself, then in progress workflows will still execute using the workflow definition at the time it started. Changing the user name is one no-no while that user has a PO Approval related to them in progress.
    However saying that, its tough to answer your question without knowing more detail of the changes. If the original approval related data structures remain in place and you haven't changed the workflow definition, then the in process workflows may be okay to complete assuming the new positions the employees are moved to still allow the "Find Approver" function to execute correctly... not sure about the organization part...
    As always, try it out in your test environment!
    Regards,
    Gareth

  • APPROVALS IN POSITION HIERARCHY IN HRSS

    Buddies,
    Assume:
    A and B are the two managers having same designations (Manager purchase)
    C and D are the two employee have same designation (purchase supervisor)
    Purchase supervisor are reporting to purchase manager.
    We are using positon hierarchy for approvals in HRSS
    leave of absence requests generated by C and D will go to only manager or will be going to both manager. What will be the approval process when their are more than one persons at same desigation.
    Please help

    You can create approval group as you want. But looks like even though you are using Position Hierarchy positions are not single incumbent. So if you send approval to position id or person occupying the position that would not be correct. So I think you may have to use supervisor hierarchy as well in this case to send the approval to the appropriate person.
    Let us know the detailed requirements.

  • Position Hierarchy in AME

    Dear All,
    I am new to AME. Can you please share the detail steps for using Position Hierarchy in AME. I understand approval limits are not honoured in AME.
    We have a requirement that based on requistion type (regular, contract, Service) the approval should follow a different heirarchy and should have approval limits based on Positions . We enabled a DFF on requistion headers to determine the Req type.
    Can we achieve this in AME.
    KR,
    Srikanth

    Dear All,
    I am new to AME. Can you please share the detail steps for using Position Hierarchy in AME. I understand approval limits are not honoured in AME.
    We have a requirement that based on requistion type (regular, contract, Service) the approval should follow a different heirarchy and should have approval limits based on Positions . We enabled a DFF on requistion headers to determine the Req type.
    Can we achieve this in AME.
    KR,
    Srikanth

  • Position Hierarchy - Employee Supervisor Change

    Hello,
    We have few of our Operating Units setup with Position Hierarchy Approval method for Purchasing documents. We want to change this to Employee-Supervisor Relationship due to change in some of the global policies.
    Would like to know what are the implications & what are the things to be taken care.
    Thanks,
    Shilpa

    You will find that emp. Supervisor hierarchy (ESH) is simpler to setup and understand. But it has less functionality.
    e.g. In PBH (position based hierarchy), you can submit PO's using different paths if necessary. But in ESH, the po always will go to the supervisor and his supervisor etc.
    To implement your change
    1) Go to the define employees screen (in the purchasing module if you use Shared HR or in the HRMS module if you use full HRMS). Enter the supervisor name for all employees that will submit /approve PO.
    2) Purchasing > setup > organizations > financial options > Human resources tab > uncheck "Use approval hierarchies" checkbox
    3) You can end-date existing hierarchies.
    4) You don't have to run Fill employee hierarchy program anymore.
    5) When a person leaves or there is a reorg, make sure you update the supervisor name for the employees.
    6) You need to continue to maintain approval groups and assignments as before.
    Hope this answers your question,
    Sandeep Gandhi

  • Position Hierarchy Based on secondary assignments.

    Hi,
    We have created a position hierarchy. While defining the hierarchy, for a position, which is secondary assignment for a person, is visible.
    However, when we create PO and forward to, the person whose secondary position is in hierarchy, is not coming in forward to list.
    If we include primary assignment position in hierarchy, than the person is available in the forward to list.
    Is there any sort of security of data working behind?
    Abdul Wahid
    http://iwidi.org

    I understand, what you are looking forward is an Enhancement request
    Have a look at the below ER
    1351979: APPROVAL WORKFLOW TO ALLOW SECONDARY ASSIGNMENT IN POSITION HIERARCHY
    Purchasing only uses the primary assignments for the purchasing functions.
    To use the Position Hierarchy, it must be setup on the employee's primary
    assignment.

  • Query regarding the Position Hierarchy.

    Client Version:R12.1.3
    We are setting up Position Hierarchy.
    Have a query in the setup.
    We have a position called Clerk--Number of Holders---2
    Clerk --Holder 1 is reporting to Manager 1
    Clerk Holder2 is reporting to Manager 2.
    When we are trying to set the Hierarchy.
    It is taking both the holders in consideration.
    Request to assist.
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    Srini

    914612 wrote:
    Dear user13056460,
    your query is very obvious you have a position type pooled and two employees are assigned to this position where in the hierarchy it shows two holder, if you want my opinion let each clerk have his own unique position as Clerk LA and CLerk DC by this you will not go through the headache of having two hierarchies and if youre having two hierarchies you need also to enable the document type (can change approval path option) the workflow engine by your scenario will get lost because two individuals have the same position so it will go to only one, options youre having
    1- let the postion with a two holder but enable the users to select approval path and employee while submiting PO's
    2- give each clerk a unique position name which is easier.
    Let me know if you have any more inquiries
    Regards
    Ammar M. GhazalehAmmar,
    That is what we have the requirment..
    I tried changing the existing hierarchy..but it is not working..
    For 2 clerks here..we created say 100.Purchase Clerk as Job and position as 200.Purchase clerk
    for the second clerk it has same job as 100.Purchase Clerk as Job and position as 200.Purchase clerk1
    (we changed a bit)
    one clerk reports to one manager..and the manager reports to dept head.
    one clerk reports to dept head..
    so while in hierarchy dept has total 3 sub ordinates and when we drill down manager has 1 sub ordinates..
    which makes sense...
    i created approval groups also...and assignments too..
    but when the newly created clerk logins and when he forwards documents..he is not seeing the default heiarchy..we have set this up in documents types..
    and the second old clerk he is seeing this when he is forwading documents for approval..
    where did i miss the setup?
    Please Advise
    Thanks
    Mahendra
    Edited by: 843237 on Feb 16, 2012 4:24 PM

  • Position Hierarchy Vs Organization Hierarchy

    Hi
    Our organization is position driven organization. I want to know what are the main advantages and disadvantages for Position Hierarchy and Organization Hierarchy.
    Because on top the hierarchies we will create security profiles.
    Can I have any document where I can find the comparison between both of these hierarchies.
    Thanks
    Gaurav

    No, the supervisor hierarchy is constructed simply by specifying supervisors on assignments.
    Added complexity can be added to the supervisor hierarchy in a multi assignment environment; you can then specify a 'supevisory assignment' as well but that is rare.
    It sounds like you will be invariable be drawn into using Positions. Having a 1-1 relationship between positions and employees is not unusual but be warned it can be extremely time consuming to maintain. I have been to organizations where position maintenance is virtually a full time job for a member of staff.
    If you are using Appraisals, definitely make use of the supervisor hierarchy, it is hard enough to implement correctly as it is without making it harder and trying to use the position hierarchy.
    You should be able to use the supervisor hierarchy for the OTL and iRec approval processes too but I'm happy to defer to other experts on the forum for those.

  • Position hierarchy behavior

    Hi,
    We have a problem with position hierarchy in OBIA we note that SIL related make only INSERT operation instead of UPDATE, our source system is Siebel financial services and when we make a change in Siebel we don’t get that this change is reflected in OBI. Somebody knows something about this behavior?
    Regards
    Carlos

    Hi,
    The only way i can think of is having an custom workflow for the Budget approvals. After creating the workflow lets say 'XYZ', you need to start the workflow 'XYZ' instead of 'PABUDWF'(the standard one) in the pa_client_extn_budget_wf (budget workflow client extension) package,procedure start_budget_wf.
    Hope this helps !
    Thanks,
    Sathish
    www.projectsaccounting.com

  • Position Hierarchy in Projects

    Hi ,
    Can we use Position Hierarchy concept of Purchasing for the Approval of Budgets ..??
    Can that Hierarchy can be used for Budget Approval in Projects ?

    Hi,
    The only way i can think of is having an custom workflow for the Budget approvals. After creating the workflow lets say 'XYZ', you need to start the workflow 'XYZ' instead of 'PABUDWF'(the standard one) in the pa_client_extn_budget_wf (budget workflow client extension) package,procedure start_budget_wf.
    Hope this helps !
    Thanks,
    Sathish
    www.projectsaccounting.com

Maybe you are looking for

  • After 10.5.5 update, MacBook Pro LCD not working.

    After I updated to 10.5.5 my MacBook Pro worked fine, until I put it to sleep. Now, the screen won't come back on even after restarting and removing the battery. Also, I can't even get an external monitor to work. I can hear the volume idicator sound

  • How to connect my videotron email

    good morning, I have the new ipad, I am unable to install my emails from videotron.ca. Help!

  • Black screen after transferring data to new Mac

    I just migrated data to my new Mac from my old one using the Migration Assistant. The old Mac indicated the transfer was complete, but I can only see a black screen on the new Mac, even after turning it on and off.

  • Sidecar XMP file question.

    Greetings all,<br />              I have some questions regarding XMP sidecar files; I am creating a complete API to access and create metadata, including XMP (I'm not basing myself on any SDK). <br /><br />1. A sidecar xmp file must have an extensio

  • Surround Sound now overwhelms other sounds after latest update

    My surround sound was incredible! But now after the latest updates, I can hardly hear the actors speaking due to the surround sound being so loud. How can I fix this? Or how can I "undo" the update? I have a Carbon X1 Solved! Go to Solution.