Possible Bug in Facebook Upload Program

I have been using Aperture for quite some time now and think that I have found an obscure bug. I took some photos over the weekend and one of them was a picture of an owl. The eyes were red, so I used the red-eye removal feature to correct this problem. I also did some cropping and auto adjusting. I put this photo and several others in an album and uploaded the album to Facebook. Someone commented on my photo and I went to view the comment and noticed that the version on FB had red eyes. I went back and verified that the both the original album and the FB album in Aperture had been corrected. I deleted the photo from FB and uploaded it again...again...it has red eyes. It is really odd, because my other updates seem to be fine.
Any ideas, comments, suggestions?

On the MBP, copying file to desktop and uploading to FB worked fine.
Deleting the photo from FB, removing it from the Aperture FB album, syncing, them moving photo back to album still had red eye.
Removed photo from FB album, synced. Removed ALL adjustments. Did red eye adjustment first, then crop, and other adjustments. Moved photo back to FB album and it works fine.
Tried only red eye adjustment and it appears to be fine. Not sure what was going on, but removing all adjustments seems to have corrected the problem within Aperture. Maybe a wire got crossed somewhere...lol.
Who knows. Odder things have happened.
Again, thanks for your help. I was mostly interested in whether other people were having issues. Most of the time, I would just upload the photos to FB and not look at them unless someone commented. This adjustment was pretty obvious.

Similar Messages

.CSV File upload program in CCM

HI Gurus,
Is there any possibility of calling file upload program from another program which should pick the file stored in server and upload as we do it in manually selecting the supplier and upload the .csv file by specifying the path.Kindly advice.
Thanks and Regards,
Sathya kumar.

Hi
I have not tried this.. But i guess it's possible.
What's your detailed business requirement ?
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

FaceBook Upload Feature uploads video as a photo still

Hi all.
Maybe this has already been widely discussed, but I've only recently upgraded to the latest iPhoto with the direct FaceBook upload button/feature.
When I try to *upload a video clip shot* with my iPhone from my album/events, it *ended up as a photo still* on my FB page. Is this a bug or a restriction?
Thanks and cheers

Dragging the video directly to the Desktop has the same effect.
Correct. That's why I said
Select the video in the iPhoto Window and go File -> Export *Kind: Original* and export to the desktop.
When you import a video iPhoto grabs the first frame as a preview and this goes into the Modified folder inside the Library. So, if you drag it to the desktop that's what you get - this preview. You need to export it.
Regards
TD

Possible bug? formatted number 0 displays as 4,294,967,295

This is really two questions in one. First, I have a routine
that sometimes provides a result of 0, which is *sometimes*
displayed in an AdvancedDataGrid column as 4,294,967,295, which I'm
assuming is somehow a meaningful number (largest int?). Anyway, I
have an ADG with a column defined as:
<mx:AdvancedDataGridColumn headerText="Remaining work"
labelFunction="rem_work_fmt" textAlign="right" />
The labelFunction called is shown below:
private function rem_work_fmt(item:Object,
column:AdvancedDataGridColumn):String
var num:String =
numberFormatter.format(item.get_remaining_work());
trace ("result: " + num);
return num;
The trace output prints: "result: 0" as expected, but the
number displayed in the grid is sometimes 0 and sometimes
4,294,967,295.
More weirdness, this only happens to the last column in the
ADG. I call the same format logic on a different column and have
never seen the wrong result. Also, the same underlying function
"get_remaining_work()" is called elsewhere on the same data and the
result is correctly displayed in a text field as 0.
Second question, I've run into some other possible bugs,
which I haven't reported because I found a work around. How does
one do that in the beta program?

lw1001,
Bugs can be filed in the public bug base at
http://bugs.adobe.com/flex/
You'll need to sign up before you can submit bugs.
Also, if you can attach the bug files to the bug report, it
makes it a lot easier for Adobe to investigate.
Let me know if you have any further questions/problems.
Peter

PA40 employee termination Upload program

hi friends..
i am facing one issue.. plz give me some idea to resolve tis..
Hr module - In TCode pa40 we can terminate a single employee by giving a necessary data..
but my client asking me a upload program to terminate a set of employees..
I tried by recording(SHDB) but its not possible because while terminating a employee it terminate all the infotype maintained for that employee..
Number of infotype maintain for a employee is vary from employee to employee.
is there any standard LSMW- direct input method is available? or any BAPI is available ?
can you throw some light to resolve tis?
thanks in advance..

Hi Deva,
I am facing the same issue. Did you ever get a solution to this problem??
Thanks
Shane

IPhoto 09 facebook uploader application generic error

when I hit the facebook uploader button on the bottom of the screen the pop down that says "do you want to set up iphoto to publish to facebook?" appears and I click the "setup" button and a second popup appears with a login page, I input my facebook email/username and my password and hit login...
then it loads a page that reads, "An error may have occurred as part of the login process. You can close this window and try returning to the application, though it may ask you to login again. This is likely due to a bug in the application."
I've tried repairing my keychain, blocking and then unblocking the app via facebook, nuking various plist files. I haven't found a solution and haven't seen mention of a similar problem on the web. HELP!

Sounds like a temporary FaceBook issue to me with several totally new reports popping up all at once - try again later - or in the morning
LN

Moving Master Images after Facebook Upload

I'm using a fully updated version of Aperture 3 and ran into a problem today moving master images that I have not experienced before. My normal workflow is to batch import images from my camera every few days in one large import, so I often have multiple subjects in every batch. For my 9 months with the program I have always downloaded everything into a temporary holding project I literally call "Hold". When I get the time to do a detailed review, I then delete what I don't want and move (drag) the master images I want to keep from "Hold" into other subject-matter-unique projects across the library. This works for me and has worked flawlessly until today when I downloaded about 20 images. What I did differently today was I took things out of my usual order and decided to quickly upload 3 of the images from the "Hold" folder to Facebook using the Aperture Uploader. The upload went fine, as it has in the past, but the problem surfaced when I then tried to move all the master images out of "Hold" to my permanent library file (project) structure. The 17 images (which were not uploaded to Facebook) moved out to their new projects just fine, as always, but the 3 masters which were the source for the Facebook upload will not allow themselves to be moved out of "Hold". When I drag them to the intended project, Aperture copies them into that project, but the original stays in "Hold." Of course, if I try to then delete what is in "Hold" (with a copy safely filed away elsewhere in the Library) I get the warning that I am attempting to delete a master upon which other versions are dependent (to include "Facebook albums" it says), and all will be deleted.
My take on this is the Facebook upload from "Hold", and the resulting versions created in the Facebook album (far bottom entries on the Library listing), now make "Hold" a permanent home for those associated master images. Is there some way to get around this and actually move the master images to where I want them to be AND to de-clutter the "Hold" folder? Or does this mean any use of Aperture's very handy (at least to date) Facebook uploader permanently glues a master to whatever project it was in when it was uploaded, never to fully and completely move again? Thanks.

I just made a test of this, and can confirm the apparent behavior. However, I examined the Masters folder in the Package of the Library (and I have a Managed Library) and I believe there may be some referencing between Projects taking place. The same appears to result where you have created a slideshow. In the Facebook album and in the Slideshow album, the file info reports the master file name -- in my case the xxxx.NEF file, which clearly none of them really are, but rather some version.
I will try to do a more precise test where I can measure the size of the Masters folder to see if the "Move" adds to its size by an amount equal to the size of the Master file.
Interesting!
Ernie
Message was edited by: Ernie Stamper

File upload program by jsf

I am doing one file upload program using
<af:inputFile label="File to Upload" columns="90"
value="#{FileProcessor.uploadedFile}"/>
component..
in Jdeveloper 11g i am getting the correct result,
but when i'm tryin to run it in Jdeveloper jdevstudio10131 it is giving this error.
java.io.EOFException: Per-request disk space limits exceeded. at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.webapp.UploadedFileImpl.loadFile(UploadedFileImpl.java:187) at
i want this file upload application to run in ecplise..but there it is not working..do i need so some to import some jar files??
tomat 5.0 i'm using there..
Or is there any otherway to upload file using jsf component which should work in eclipse-tomcat enviornment also..
please help
thanks

Mr BalusC,
Yes Iam talking about a custom made upload component. The fileupload tutorials u send are good but my requirement is not meeting them. Among my requirements one is mutilple file uploads in the single view page. This is possible at present with my custom upload componet. Only if the problem gets solved. Any way once again please think on my problem and give your solution on it.
Here is my problem:
The problem is I have to access the components from view page which this kind of requirement possible in jsp by request parsing which results the key value pairs of the form components. This same thing/way I should get in backing bean from JSF view page.
The solution I want may like as follows.
Note this code is incorrect and wrong but for to understand my requirement.
someobject.getComponentIdValue("clientID"); which returns a string value as d:\images\Tutle.jpg
The clientID is upload file component' Id . In the request it may be the key associated with value as file complete path. By this kind of way my upload filter is able to get the orignal file. Ok i need this in my backing bean to get the orignal filename to insert into the database. Please for this give the solution or reply.many thanx,
vijaycanaan.

Possible Bug: Migrating 6.1 to 7.0 - Uninstall of 6.1 removes 7.0 services

This is a report of a possible bug. We are migrating from 6.1 to 7.0u2. On our Admin Node, we finished migrating multiple instances from 6.1 to 7.0 so we went uninstalled the 6.1 server components. This uninstall process removed the 7.0u2 services though not the instances from the Admin Node. The configuration folders in the 7.0 folder were not removed so we were able to delete then redeploy the instance. Note that the service name in 6.1 was the same as the service name in 7.0 (e.g. https-xyz). However, we had already used the 6.1 Administration Server to remove each individual 6.1 server prior to migrating the configuration to 7.0.

sriram.natarajan wrote:
hi
what do you mean by "removed the services" but not the instances ? The uninstaller for the "Sun ONE" web server removed the Windows Services for the multiple instances that I created for the "Sun Java System" web server.
If I am not mistaken, you probably didn't completely go through the migration log to make sure that what is migrated and what is not. please note that as part of migration all static content files and some other data files are not migrated. you are required to look into the migration log and make sure that you manually move those files into 7.0 location once the automated migration completes successfully. so, if you removed the 6.0 without migrating those static files , then you might see a whole bunch of 404 and other weird errors. Static content files have nothing to do with what I'm talking about. I had a 6.1 installation with a number of "servers" (what 7.0 calls instances). In order to migrate and keep the same service name (e.g. https-xyz), I had to first make a copy of the https-xyz configuration directory, use the 6.1 admin to remove the https-xyz (this would remove the https-xyz service), recopy the https-xyz configuration directory to the 6.1 install directory, then proceed with the automated migration.
for more information, on what is migrated and what not, please refer to
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/820-2201/gbhfb?l=en&a=view
also ,please refer to the next link on the above pages related to 'files requiring manual migration'Once all my 6.1 instance migrations were complete and all that was left running from 6.1 was the Administration Server, I used the "Add/Remove Programs" control panel to uninstall the "Sun ONE Web Server 6.1" program. This uninstall process removed the Windows services created for the "Sun Java System" web server but did not remove the instances from the "Configuration Store" for the new web server.
Unfortunately, the bug that I am reporting above has nothing to do with "a whole bunch of 404 and other weird errors. "

Fail safe logic needed for purchase order upload program

Hello all,
i am working on creating PO's by reading data from a text file. I need to implement fail safe logic in it, which is to make sure this program uploads all the records in the text file successfully. For example, i have 1000 records in my text file and while running the upload program if the program times out while creating the 500th PO or if SAP is down at that time, then we have 499 PO's created and 501 yet to be created. But if we run the same program again, we will generate duplicate PO's for 499 again. I want to avoid this kind of problem.
How do i implement this idea?
Kindly guide me on this.
Thanks.

Ok ..
Then I would suggest you use Application Log to keep the success and error messages of PO processing.
You can check trsnaction SLG0 and create your own application log object.
Then you need to use FMs BAL_LOG_* to crate and add messages to it.
This way you will have a facility to check as which of your records are converted to PO for a run.
In case SAP gets down in between , still you can find the details using Xn SLG1 and then accordingly remove the records from your file which are already converted to PO.
Thanks,
Ram

Existing Function modules or Standard upload Programs

Hi,
Can any one tell, Are there any Function modules or Standard upload programs exists for following transactions:
Creating production version(C223)
Creating Master recipe(C201)
Creation Apportionment Structure(C202)
Creation BOM Allocation(CS08)
(This all tcodes comes under Production planning.)
Thanks in advance.

Hi Vanitha,
Check this
for C223
CM_FV_PROD_VERS_MAINTAIN
CM_FV_PROD_VERS_SAVE
CM_FV_PROD_VERS_SAVE_ALL
CY01_ORDER_MODIFY_PROD_VERSION
For C201
C2_CU_RECIPE_EXCLUDE_CREATE
CONTROL_RECIPE_CREATE
For C202
APPOINTMENT_GRP_CREATE
APPOINTMENT_CREATE
APPOINTMENT_GENERATE
APPOINTMENT_GENERATE_2
For CS08
CSAP_MAT_BOM_ALLOC_CREATE
Hope it helps...
Lokesh
pls. reward appropriate points
Message was edited by: Lokesh Aggarwal

I found the solution to a Mavericks bug on the Mail program. How can I share it? Several of my mail boxes stopped functioning properly when I updated to Mavericks. After long hours, I discovered that if I change the name of the mailbox, the content works.

I found the solution to a Mavericks bug on the Mail program. How can I share it? Several of my mail boxes stopped functioning properly when I updated to Mavericks. The title of the mails stored in the mailbox appear, but the content was unavailable.
After 4 long hours at the phone with the Apple staff unable to help me, I discovered that if I change the name of the mailbox, the contents of the mails stored there become available.
Please, make this solution available to other people!

You have found the the way to share it. Include your problem and its solution in a forum post in the Mavericks forums. Then mark you own post with a green solved star.
Note. You won't get any points for that; points are only awarded where you mark someone else's post as either helpful or solved.

Is it possible for students to upload documents in Captivate?

Is it possible for students to upload documents into captivate?

Hi there
If you mean that students would be interacting with what Captivate produces, there is nothing that would allow that out of the box. But Captivate does interface with JavaScript and it does have the Web Object available, so I'm pretty sure some clever folks can create code that would open a portal that would allow uploading documents to a server.
Cheers... Rick

When my iPod Touch is connected to my Mac, and I select Update to update the software of my iPod Touch, I get a message saying that my iTunes software is current, but it will not update my iPod Touch software. Is there a bug in the iPod program?

When my iPod Touch is connected to my Mac, and I select Update to update the software of my iPod Touch, I get a message saying that my iTunes software is current, but it will not update my iPod Touch software. Is there a bug in the iPod program?

If you have the first gen ipod touch as your information shows, then you would have to buy a software update:
Purchasing iOS 3.1 Software Update for iPod touch (1st generation)

Possible Bug In Apex 4.0.2

Hi Everyone.
I would like to report what I think is a bug in Apex 4.0.2.
If you go to my workspace on apex.oracle.com:
Workspace = EEG
Username = [email protected]
Password = galaxy (all lowercase)
Run the application: 37796 - Elie_Various_Goodies [no credentials are required]
This app was imported from my 4.0.1 workspace at my job. On the page I created two Date Picker items, P1_BEGIN_DATE and P1_END_DATE. I set them up so that whenever a user selects a begin date, a dynamic action "MANAGE_DATES" fires and automatically sets P1_END_DATE to this selected begin date value. Now when a user goes to select an end date, the displayed calendar starts at the previously selected begin date rather than the default of "Today".
All of this worked fine on my office (4.0.1) workspace. However, after exporting this app and then importing onto apex.oracle.com, none of this functionality would work. Even worse, whenever I try to select a begin date or even an end date, the selected dates never make it into the date picker fields. Displaying the "Session" window shows these fields as empty.
It was only after I copied the two date picker fields and also re-created my dynamic action (P1_BEGIN_DATE2, P1_END_DATE2, MANAGE_DATES) did my functionality return.
This behavior is quite strange. I can only think this is some sort of bug attributed to the export/import process when exporting a 4.0.1 app into a 4.0.2 workspace. I am not sure if this bizarre behavior happens with non-date picker items. Nor am I sure if this beavior would be repeated if I export/import from 4.0.2 into the another 4.0.2 environment.
Another strange thing I noticed. If I change my date picker items to be "date picker (classic)" type items, the dynamic action does not work at all. This is true in both 4.0.2 and 4.0.1. I'm not sure if this a bug or not. It could be that the classic date picker is just not "javascript" enabled so to speak. If that is true, then it would have been nice if the docs would have warned us about this.
Has anyone else seen this behavior?
Thank you.
Elie

Hi Joel.
First let me thank you for the warning about allowing "everyone" access to my workspace.
You're correct, of course. Anyone could destroy anything within my workspace. I guess I was too trusting especially as I have seen many posts on the Forum where others have given access to their workspace so that responders can offer help. I really should be more discreet about this. Again, thank you. Needless to say, I have changed my password.
With respect to the possible bug, the MANAGE_DATES dynamic action is intended to be a submit page because that is the only way I can see to get BOTH the P1_END_DATE date picker item as well as the end date textual field to be assigned the selected P1_BEGIN_DATE. I tried to use a dynamic action in which javascript sets the value of the end date textual field to the selected P1_BEGIN_DATE value. This works without the need to submit the page. Unfortunately, this does not cause the P1_END_DATE date picker item to default to this value. Instead, the default remains at today's date. This is why I finally resorted to a dynamic action that submits the page whenever a new value is selected (that is, a "change" event) from the P1_BEGIN_DATE date picker item.
All of this works in my office 4.0.1 environment. However, I was puzzled when this fails under 4.0.2 on the hosted web site at apex.oracle.com. This is why I posted a "possible" bug in 4.0.2.
I hope this all makes sense.
One more thing, as already mentioned in my original post, this "defaulting a date picker" functionality does NOT work at all for the "classic" date picker items in both 4.0.1 nor in 4.0.2. I realize one can implement this functionality (I' guessing) my using, say, a "onChange" javascript call to submit the page. It's just funny that the "classic" date picker items are not acted upon by the dynamic action MANAGE_DATES that submits the page.
Thank you.
Elie

Possible Bug in Facebook Upload Program

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for