Possible router problem

Hi all
I have a Netgear DG834G wireless router and iam not sure if i have a problem with it. I have a 8mb BB line. When I log in to the router it tells me I have a downstream speed of 5400 kbps which I think is quite good the upstream speed is 448 kbps which again I think is normal. For the last few days safari seems to be working slow as in loading pages ect. I have tried a BB speed test and it tells me my conection speed is only 1500 kbps. so what gives. It looks to me that the problem is with the router as iam getting high speed at the router but a slower speed at my mac. It makes no difference if i connect wireless or with an ethernet cable. I have checked all my settings and they are all ok. So any ideas I dont mind buying a new router if thats the problem but I dont want to throw it away if its ok. Prehaps someone could advise me of a good router to buy.
Thanks Rob
Powermac 2.7   Mac OS X (10.4.8)  

Don't junk the router. Speak to your ISP as a first step. Send him your test results as attachments, but ensure they have been derived from a router connection direct into the BT Master Socket. Try both the socket on the front of the box and then into the socket behind the removeable lower section of the Master Socket, that is where the "BT Domain" starts. Use BTs speed test page.
What the router says is the connection speed (what I assume is the meaning of your first refernce to speed) is a sort of theoretical maximum speed derived from a sort of test that does not exactly replicate normal data transfer usage.
The actual data transfer speed would vary from that according to the number of spiders in the junction boxes and other transient variables and there is also a matter of contention.
The ISP can only grouse to BT if there is such a deficiency that they can argue an actual FAULT that BT could correct. They probaly would try but could not force the issue.
If there is a fault other than as above it is that ISPs speak about speeds such as 8MBPS that no one has ever got. You might try a "Trading Standards Complaint" along those lines. The ISPs will say that they only promise speeds of "UP TO 8MBPS" and that means anything from one bit per second to 8MBPS unless you could get a court to say otherwise.
The Netgear router will not be at fault.

Similar Messages

  • Not seeing comcast speed bump possible router problem

    I got a letter in the mail this week about the speed bump from 50 to 75 Mbps and to just power cycle equipment and done Ran a few speed tests and average  51 down /11 up I power cycled my modem and router and PC again and had the same results. I did some googling and did not find anything related to my problem. I found something about slower speeds over wireless and some settings to change, but I m going over the wire. I still made the changes to see if they would help, disablling (Home Network Defender) and noticed no change with that. I master reset my router and no change. I directly connect to the modem and ran a speed test and was seeing 83 down /11 up. So this has me thinking time to buy a new router. Current hardware setupModem:TM702GRouter: WRT610N V1 

    I should have been more clear on my first post. I did end up using that as troubleshooting method the same day I made the post. I removed the router from the mix and was seeing the bumped up speed  of 83 down and 12 up. So I unplugged the modem for 2 minutes no battery came with this modem since Comcast wanted extra for it which is lame, but I have Tripp Lite Smart 1500 lcdt. Plugged the modem back in and let it fully power up and finish booting up where all the green lights were solid, plugged up the router and waited a few minutes for it to wake up, then did a speed test and was back down to 51 down and 11 up.  So currently I'm just running a direct connection to the modem with no router.

  • TV Guide fails - router problem?

    When the guide failed on our main TV is the family room, I tried trouble-shooting it -- no luck.  Then I "chatted" online with Verizon's "Raul" for two hours, trying everything he asked, including swapping the box with the one in the bedroom -- Raul thought it was the biox and gave me an 800 number to call to get a swap in boxes.  However, before the weekend is over, all but one TV has the same problem.  Right now, we get the guide on one TV and no guide on four TVs.
    I've worked on this all day so far today.  Verizon's In-Home Agent reports that none of the TVs have connectivity with the router.  So I've concentrated on that, I've unplugged the router and the boxes, reset the router, accessed the router's control panel to see it seems to be working well.  The only thing I can see wrong is this:  The router's "WAN Ethernet" light stays dark, though its "WAN Coax" light stays lit.  I wonder if this could be the problem; and, if so, how could I fix that?
    One thing worries me about a router problem, though: Why would I still have the guide on one of the six TVs?
    Anyone have a clue if I'm on the right track?
    Thanks,
    George

    Yes, sounds like a router problem.
    The STB has to download the program guide via the router. Each box should download 10 days worth of programing. So when the router goes out it could take as much as 10 days before the guide disappears. So the one box that still has the guide, was the last one to update and had more guide data stored than the others. It will go as well just given time.
    If you have rebooted and reset the router, then the problem is either you have a bad router or possibly a bad splitter. Either way, you need to call tech support so they can get a tech out.
    ====================================================================================
    Error exists between keyboard and chair.

  • Another routing problem

    I just replaced a FreeBSD box with Solaris 10 x86 U5.
    I want my Windows boxes to reach internet thru Solaris. At the moment windows clients are able to ping both NICs on the Solaris. However, they can not ping default gateway of Solaris box. There is no problem on Solaris. I can reach internet without any problem.
    Before posting, I used routeadm and (1) I enabled only ipv4-forwarding (did not work), (2) I enabled only ipv4-routing (did not work), (3) I enabled both ipv4-forwarding & ipv4-routing (did not help)
    I also read about 5 pages of similar routing problems in forums. No clear solution is provided in any of them. I am posting this with the hope to find a solution.
    Some information about my network is as follows:
    bash-3.00# ifconfig -a
    lo0: flags=2001000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL> mtu 8232 index 1
    inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
    bge0: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2
    inet 192.168.2.2 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.2.255
    ether 0:1c:c4:31:5:fd
    e1000g0: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 3
    inet 192.168.1.3 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255
    ether 0:1b:21:15:15:29
    bash-3.00#
    bash-3.00# netstat -rn
    Routing Table: IPv4
    Destination Gateway Flags Ref Use Interface
    default 192.168.2.1 UG 1 15658
    192.168.1.0 192.168.1.3 U 1 177 e1000g0
    192.168.2.0 192.168.2.2 U 1 8 bge0
    127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 4 58 lo0
    bash-3.00#
    bash-3.00# routeadm
    Configuration Current Current
    Option Configuration System State
    IPv4 routing disabled disabled
    IPv6 routing disabled disabled
    IPv4 forwarding disabled disabled
    IPv6 forwarding disabled disabled
    Routing services "route:default ripng:default"
    Routing daemons:
    STATE FMRI
    disabled svc:/network/routing/legacy-routing:ipv4
    disabled svc:/network/routing/legacy-routing:ipv6
    disabled svc:/network/routing/ndp:default
    disabled svc:/network/routing/zebra:quagga
    disabled svc:/network/routing/rip:quagga
    disabled svc:/network/routing/ripng:default
    disabled svc:/network/routing/ripng:quagga
    disabled svc:/network/routing/ospf:quagga
    disabled svc:/network/routing/ospf6:quagga
    disabled svc:/network/routing/bgp:quagga
    disabled svc:/network/routing/rdisc:default
    disabled svc:/network/routing/route:default
    bash-3.00#
    bash-3.00# ndd -get /dev/ip ip_forwarding
    0
    bash-3.00#

    kucukoglu wrote:
    I just replaced a FreeBSD box with Solaris 10 x86 U5.
    I want my Windows boxes to reach internet thru Solaris. At the moment windows clients are able to ping both NICs on the Solaris. However, they can not ping default gateway of Solaris box. There is no problem on Solaris. I can reach internet without any problem.Does the outside world know how to route to the clients behind Solaris? I'll bet they do not.
    If that's true, then routing/forwarding isn't useful. You'll have to set up the Solaris box as a NAT gateway instead. Ipfilter can do that. There are several cookbooks for it.
    Before posting, I used routeadm and (1) I enabled only ipv4-forwarding (did not work), (2) I enabled only ipv4-routing (did not work), (3) I enabled both ipv4-forwarding & ipv4-routing (did not help)
    I also read about 5 pages of similar routing problems in forums. No clear solution is provided in any of them. I am posting this with the hope to find a solution.Your solution is fine for outbound packets (the clients use Solaris as a gateway and then it forwards them on to the internet). But for the return packet, that's not possible. There's no route published.
    Darren

  • SAP-Basis System: 1 possible network problems detected - check tracefile

    Dear Gurus,
    I am getting this error in syslog in MMC for ECC 6.0 on windows with db2.
    SAP-Basis System: > 1 possible network problems detected - check tracefile and adjust.
    Regards
    Rao.

    hi,
    can you look at this
    [http://sapbasisnotes.blogspot.com/2009/05/sap-startup-problems-in-windows.html]
    Regards,
    Muralidhar

  • Router problems how can I connect direct

    I am continually having router problems from my service provider. How can i connect my printer directly to my computer? Thanks

    Hi,
    You need a printer which supports this first and then use the following instructions:
         http://www8.hp.com/au/en/campaigns/wireless-printing-center/wireless-direct.html
    Regards.
    BH
    **Click the KUDOS thumb up on the left to say 'Thanks'**
    Make it easier for other people to find solutions by marking a Reply 'Accept as Solution' if it solves your problem.

  • Mysterious routing problem / interface determination

    Hi,
    I have a very very strange routing problem with XI.
    A message is sent from R/3 to XI and then send via adapter to an external party. The routing is configured well. But sometimes I have the following problem:
    A message is received by XI (from R/3). The receiver is determinated. Although an interface determination and receiver agreement is configured, the trace shows "no interface determination fpr party xyz and service abc found". The very strange thing is that finally the receiver interface DELINS.DELFOR01 with namespace urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages is set!!
    Finally, the error message is "no receiver agreement found for "... DELINS.DELFOR01, urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages", which is reasonable because this receiver interface has never ever been configured!
    Any idea why the interface determination cannot be found and nevertheless a completely wrong receiver interface is set?
    This error occurs just sometimes for certain partners, but not always with all messages for these partners!
    Help appreciated!
    Christopher

    Hi,
    all routing objects are 100% correct. Particularly the receiver service has definitely no DELINS.DELFOR01 interface, but nevertheless the Integration Runtime tries to send the message to this interface. Another strange thing is that in the trace there is the warning "no interface determination for party xxx and service xxx found".
    By the way: The Receiver Determination was configured to terminate message processing when no receiver can be found.
    CHRIS

  • XML fetch failed -- possibly a problem with AvXml.dll or its permissions

    When attempting to access the Status Monitor I receive the following error message:
    XML fetch failed -- possibly a problem with AvXml.dll or its permissions.
    Check that the "AvXml" virtual directory settings in IIS have proper permissions and allow execute access.
    I've tried all combos of security on the IIS directory. What am I missing?

    Hi Lindborg
    I have that problem with version 4.0 (X), it is due?, As I fix?.
    Unity I have a failover cluster, I have several problems, sometimes not let me delete mailbox, I can retrieve messages.
    thanks for any help you can provide.
    Regard

  • On the continuing saga of third party router problems......

    I got an Apple TV which works great with my wireless Airport WDS, but then I was looking into any problems people could be having with it and ran into this:
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=901401&tstart=0
    Check the third party router problems where Airports worked great.
    Networking is ...networking, but you also get what you pay for.

    Hi mgrant,
    The information at the bottem of the article in in Keith_Beddoe's personal website may help. Link: Using your own router for Infinity
    The MTU Size needs to be set as 1492
    Cheers
    jac_95 | BT.com Help Site | BT Service Status
    Someone Solved Your Question?
    Please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’
    Try a Search
    See if someone in the community had the same problem and how they got it resolved.

  • Basis System: 2 possible network problems detected - check tracefile

    Hi Experts,
    I have installed a a Netweaver 7.01 when i start the server throught MMC
    first the dispatcher show the message as unable to reach teh message server
    but where as message server is running successfully.
    after few seconds it shows the status Stopped
    Below is my trace please help me to solve this issue.
    Thanks,
    Veeru.
    trc file: "dev_disp", trc level: 1, release: "700"
    sysno      00
    sid        NSP
    systemid   560 (PC with Windows NT)
    relno      7000
    patchlevel 0
    patchno    95
    intno      20050900
    make:      multithreaded, ASCII, optimized
    pid        3892
    Wed Jan 14 05:46:37 2009
    kernel runs with dp version 224(ext=109) (@(#) DPLIB-INT-VERSION-224)
    length of sys_adm_ext is 360 bytes
    SWITCH TRC-HIDE on ***
    ***LOG Q00=> DpSapEnvInit, DPStart (00 3892) [dpxxdisp.c   1239]
         shared lib "dw_xml.dll" version 95 successfully loaded
         shared lib "dw_xtc.dll" version 95 successfully loaded
         shared lib "dw_stl.dll" version 95 successfully loaded
         shared lib "dw_gui.dll" version 95 successfully loaded
         shared lib "dw_mdm.dll" version 95 successfully loaded
    rdisp/softcancel_sequence :  -> 0,5,-1
    use internal message server connection to port 3900
    Wed Jan 14 05:46:39 2009
    WARNING => DpNetCheck: NiHostToAddr(www.doesnotexist0121.qqq.nxst) took 2 seconds
    Wed Jan 14 05:46:44 2009
    WARNING => DpNetCheck: NiAddrToHost(1.0.0.0) took 5 seconds
    ***LOG GZZ=> 2 possible network problems detected - check tracefile and adjust the DNS settings [dpxxtool2.c  5355]
    MtxInit: 30000 0 0
    DpSysAdmExtInit: ABAP is active
    DpSysAdmExtInit: VMC (JAVA VM in WP) is not active
    DpIPCInit2: start server >Veeru_NSP_00                            <
    DpShMCreate: sizeof(wp_adm)          6328     (904)
    DpShMCreate: sizeof(tm_adm)          3605136     (17936)
    DpShMCreate: sizeof(wp_ca_adm)          1200     (60)
    DpShMCreate: sizeof(appc_ca_adm)     1200     (60)
    DpCommTableSize: max/headSize/ftSize/tableSize=500/8/528040/528048
    DpShMCreate: sizeof(comm_adm)          528048     (1048)
    DpSlockTableSize: max/headSize/ftSize/fiSize/tableSize=0/0/0/0/0
    DpShMCreate: sizeof(slock_adm)          0     (96)
    DpFileTableSize: max/headSize/ftSize/tableSize=0/0/0/0
    DpShMCreate: sizeof(file_adm)          0     (72)
    DpShMCreate: sizeof(vmc_adm)          0     (1280)
    DpShMCreate: sizeof(wall_adm)          (22440/34344/56/100)
    DpShMCreate: sizeof(gw_adm)     48
    DpShMCreate: SHM_DP_ADM_KEY          (addr: 04ED0040, size: 4205552)
    DpShMCreate: allocated sys_adm at 04ED0040
    DpShMCreate: allocated wp_adm at 04ED1A28
    DpShMCreate: allocated tm_adm_list at 04ED32E0
    DpShMCreate: allocated tm_adm at 04ED3310
    DpShMCreate: allocated wp_ca_adm at 052435A0
    DpShMCreate: allocated appc_ca_adm at 05243A50
    DpShMCreate: allocated comm_adm at 05243F00
    DpShMCreate: system runs without slock table
    DpShMCreate: system runs without file table
    DpShMCreate: allocated vmc_adm_list at 052C4DB0
    DpShMCreate: allocated gw_adm at 052C4DF0
    DpShMCreate: system runs without vmc_adm
    DpShMCreate: allocated ca_info at 052C4E20
    DpShMCreate: allocated wall_adm at 052C4E28
    MBUF state OFF
    DpCommInitTable: init table for 500 entries
    Wed Jan 14 05:46:50 2009
    EmInit: MmSetImplementation( 2 ).
    MM global diagnostic options set: 0
    <ES> client 0 initializing ....
    <ES> InitFreeList
    <ES> block size is 1024 kByte.
    Using implementation view
    <EsNT> Memory Reset disabled as NT default
    ERROR => <EsNT> NTGetBaseAddress failed, no free region [esnti.c      1450]
    Error 15 while initializing OS dependent part.
    ERROR => DpEmInit: EmInit (1) [dpxxdisp.c   9556]
    ERROR => DpMemInit: DpEmInit (-1) [dpxxdisp.c   9485]
    DP_FATAL_ERROR => DpSapEnvInit: DpMemInit
    DISPATCHER EMERGENCY SHUTDOWN ***
    increase tracelevel of WPs
    NiWait: sleep (10000ms) ...
    NiISelect: timeout 10000ms
    NiISelect: maximum fd=1
    NiISelect: read-mask is NULL
    NiISelect: write-mask is NULL
    Wed Jan 14 05:47:00 2009
    NiISelect: TIMEOUT occured (10000ms)
    dump system status
    Workprocess Table (long)               Tue Jan 13 21:47:00 2009
    ========================
    No Ty. Pid      Status  Cause Start Err Sem CPU    Time  Program  Cl  User         Action                    Table
    ERROR => DpRqTxt: bad rqtype -1 [dpxxrq.c     785]
    0 ?         -1 Free          no      0   0             0                                                             
    ERROR => DpRqTxt: bad rqtype -1 [dpxxrq.c     785]
    1 ?         -1 Free          no      0   0             0                                                             
    ERROR => DpRqTxt: bad rqtype -1 [dpxxrq.c     785]
    2 ?         -1 Free          no      0   0             0                                                             
    ERROR => DpRqTxt: bad rqtype -1 [dpxxrq.c     785]
    3 ?         -1 Free          no      0   0             0                                                             
    ERROR => DpRqTxt: bad rqtype -1 [dpxxrq.c     785]
    4 ?         -1 Free          no      0   0             0                                                             
    ERROR => DpRqTxt: bad rqtype -1 [dpxxrq.c     785]
    5 ?         -1 Free          no      0   0             0                                                             
    ERROR => DpRqTxt: bad rqtype -1 [dpxxrq.c     785]
    6 ?         -1 Free          no      0   0             0                                                             
    Dispatcher Queue Statistics               Tue Jan 13 21:47:00 2009
    ===========================
    --------++++--
    +
    Typ
    now
    high
    max
    writes
    reads
    --------++++--
    +
    NOWP
    0
    0
    2000
    0
    0
    --------++++--
    +
    DIA
    0
    0
    2000
    0
    0
    --------++++--
    +
    UPD
    0
    0
    2000
    0
    0
    --------++++--
    +
    ENQ
    0
    0
    2000
    0
    0
    --------++++--
    +
    BTC
    0
    0
    2000
    0
    0
    --------++++--
    +
    SPO
    0
    0
    2000
    0
    0
    --------++++--
    +
    UP2
    0
    0
    2000
    0
    0
    --------++++--
    +
    max_rq_id          0
    wake_evt_udp_now     0
    wake events           total     0,  udp     0 (  0%),  shm     0 (  0%)
    since last update     total     0,  udp     0 (  0%),  shm     0 (  0%)
    Dump of tm_adm structure:               Tue Jan 13 21:47:00 2009
    =========================
    Term    uid  man user    term   lastop  mod wp  ta   a/i (modes)
    Workprocess Comm. Area Blocks               Tue Jan 13 21:47:00 2009
    =============================
    Slots: 20, Used: 0, Max: 0
    --------++--
    +
    id
    owner
    pid
    eyecatcher
    --------++--
    +
    NiWait: sleep (5000ms) ...
    NiISelect: timeout 5000ms
    NiISelect: maximum fd=1
    NiISelect: read-mask is NULL
    NiISelect: write-mask is NULL
    Wed Jan 14 05:47:05 2009
    NiISelect: TIMEOUT occured (5000ms)
    DpHalt: shutdown server >Veeru_NSP_00                            < (normal)
    DpJ2eeDisableRestart
    Switch off Shared memory profiling
    ShmProtect( 57, 3 )
    ShmProtect(SHM_PROFILE, SHM_PROT_RW
    ShmProtect( 57, 1 )
    ShmProtect(SHM_PROFILE, SHM_PROT_RD
    DpWakeUpWps: wake up all wp's
    Stop work processes
    Terminate gui connections
    wait for end of work processes
    not attached to the message server
    cleanup EM
    EsCleanup ....
    EmCleanup() -> 0
    Es2Cleanup: Cleanup ES2
    Wed Jan 14 05:47:06 2009
    ***LOG Q05=> DpHalt, DPStop ( 3892) [dpxxdisp.c   10333]
    Good Bye .....

    Hi Eric,
    Actually in my NSP_DVEBMS00_VEERU thePHYS_MEMSIZE  is set to 128
    So.....
    Do i need to change in the here below file.....:
    If yes wht shall i change it to ?
    Template for ABAP SID_INSTANCE_HOST
    SAPSYSTEMNAME = NSP
    SAPGLOBALHOST = Veeru
    SAPSYSTEM = 00
    INSTANCE_NAME = DVEBMGS00
    DIR_EXECUTABLE = C:\SAP\NSP\SYS\exe\run
    DIR_CT_RUN = C:\SAP\NSP\SYS\exe\run
    Instance runs without sapmnt saploc shares
    DIR_INSTANCE = C:\SAP\NSP\DVEBMGS00
    DIR_INSTALL = C:\SAP\NSP\SYS
    DIR_HOME = $(DIR_INSTANCE)\work
    DIR_GLOBAL = C:\SAP\NSP\SYS\global
    PHYS_MEMSIZE = 128
    rdisp/wp_no_dia = 3
    rdisp/wp_no_btc = 1
    icm/server_port_0 = PROT=HTTP,PORT=80$$
    SAP Messaging Service parameters are set in the DEFAULT.PFL
    ms/server_port_0 = PROT=HTTP,PORT=81$$
    rdisp/wp_no_enq = 1
    rdisp/wp_no_vb = 1
    rdisp/wp_no_spo = 1
    rdisp/enqname = Veeru_NSP_00
    rdisp/myname = Veeru_NSP_00
    abap/buffersize = 100000
    alert/MONI_SEGM_SIZE = 0
    enque/table_size = 2000
    rspo/local_print/method = 2
    rsdb/ntab/entrycount = 5000
    rsdb/ntab/ftabsize = 3000
    rsdb/ntab/sntabsize = 100
    rsdb/ntab/irbdsize = 1000
    rsdb/cua/buffersize = 500
    rsdb/obj/buffersize = 2048
    rsdb/obj/max_objects = 500
    rsdb/otr/buffersize_kb = 1000
    rsts/ccc/cachesize = 6000000
    rtbb/buffer_length = 500
    rtbb/max_tables = 50
    sap/bufdir_entries = 200
    zcsa/installed_languages = ED
    zcsa/presentation_buffer_area = 350000
    zcsa/calendar_area = 300000
    zcsa/table_buffer_area = 3000000
    zcsa/db_max_buftab = 500
    ztta/roll_area = 1000000
    ztta/diag_area = 128000
    ztta/dynpro_area = 150000
    ztta/cua_area = 250000
    rdisp/PG_SHM = 100
    rdisp/ROLL_SHM = 100
    rdisp/autoabaptime = 0
    rdisp/bufrefmode = sendoff,exeoff
    rdisp/wp_ca_blk_no = 20
    rdisp/appc_ca_blk_no = 20
    rdisp/max_wprun_time = 300
    icm/min_threads = 5
    icm/max_threads = 10
    icm/max_conn = 20
    icm/host_name_full = localhost
    mpi/total_size_MB = 10
    auth/new_buffering = 1
    sapgui/user_scripting = TRUE
    ssf/name = SAPSECULIB
    ssf/ssfapi_lib = $(DIR_CT_RUN)\sapsecu.dll
    sec/libsapsecu = $(DIR_CT_RUN)\sapsecu.dll
    login/create_sso2_ticket = 2
    login/accept_sso2_ticket = 1
    login/ticket_only_to_host = 1
    rsdb/dbid = NSP
    dbs/ada/schema = SAPNSP

  • E2000 + WAG160N routing problem?

    Hi all,
    I have a new E2000 router with address 192.168.0.1 connected to a WAG160N Modem router with address 192.168.1.1
    and several computers at each router.  All have DHCP activated and wifi active and working.
    The cascading connection between both devices seems working well only in one direction.
    All seems ok as I can access to internet from any computer. Also, computers connected to E2000 have accces 
    to computers on WAG160N modem BUT computers connected at modem do NOT have access to computer at router.
    In fact from a computer connected to the E2000 I can configure the web interface of the E2000 and also the WAG160N
    but from a computers connected at WAG160N I have access only to this interface but not to the E2000 interface.
    I don't know if could be a routing problem. Any help will be appreciated.
    Thanks in advance,
    Marti

    The E2000 is configured to do NAT and thus protects the LAN from the internet side. If it was easily accessible your WAG LAN would be easily accessible from the internet.
    You want to set up the E2000 as simple access point:
    Unplug the E2000 from the WAG160N and open the web interface of the E2000 from a computer wired to the E2000.
    On the main setup page
    1. change the internet connection type to Automatic/DHCP (in case you have changed it).
    2. change the LAN IP address from 192.168.0.1 to 192.168.1.2.
    3. Disable the DHCP server.
    4. Save settings.
    Unplug the computer.
    Now wire one of the numbered LAN ports of the E2000 to the WAG160N. Don't use the internet port on the E2000.
    That's the best setup you can do with your two routers... The E2000 is only used as simple access point and ethernet switch.

  • I want all possible router & switch system error messages

    I want to research about system message classication topic
    so I want all possible router & switch system error messages
    Could you send it me?
    Kind regards.
    -- Meta --

    Dear Grace
    Are you using EOIO for this scenatrio.
    In this case you have to cancel/delete the first message which is in holding state.
    If you are not using EOIO and still the messages are in holding state then the receiver system must accept the message (in your cae the DB)
    Regards
    Sourabh

  • Possible routing loop?

    i get these messages from our edge wae device, they have various host ip's not sure what to make of it. there is no routing loop unless waas/wae is doing something that i am not aware of to cause that to happen. wae is in a seperate net from the users and the router. we are running 4.0.17 and wccpV2, the prepositioning and and cifs functions seem to be performing as advertised, print services are being phased out and moved back to core as we cannot seem to find a good driver set for the various printers at the site, but it seems unlikely that would be the issue anyway.
    any ideas appreciated.
    Message #1: [2008-05-23 15:27:10,101][ WARN] - Host 172.84.12.245:139 was not discovered, bypass period: 0 sec, number of events: 76, reason: possible routing loop
    Randy

    172.84.12.245 is indeed a branch host pc, is there a way to make this stop or is it just telling me that an unregistered server at the core is talking to a client at the branch ?
    Thanks
    RR

  • Route problem

    Hi all,  I am new to this forum and also new to Archlinux. I have been using SuSE for 4 years and learned how to use that gui. I never learned the grassroot of linux though. I completed the install on my TPad 600e without any problem at all. I am using a old orinoco gold that has been my standby forever. I have googled and searched this forum for several hours and tried all the suggestions I came across. My problem seems to be the same as many others have had. I had originally thought it was a route problem, but the output or netstat -nr is exactly the same as the output on my SuSE computer. I am not good with words, but let me try a description.
    I cannot connect to my home lan at all. I have assigned a static ip and the output of iwconfig verifies that it is correct as I have assigned. When I try to ping my router the system returns the famous "Destination Host Unreachable" As mentioned I have tried to setup my default gateway and it is identical to the the output from my SuSE computer. When I try a dhcp setup and do a network restart the restart always fails. I have gone over and over my conf files looking for a fatfinger mistake but all looks exactly the way the examples I have searched up and I cannot see any typos. I would like to get this figured out for myself but I am out of clues on where to look and would appreciate new ideas.
    It is as if there is a firewall in place, but this is a straight from the CD basic install to which I have installe the network section.
    I really need to be pointed in a new direction.
    David

    ralvez wrote:Here ... my IP is 192.168.1.21 try to reach me 
    Gotcha!
    PING 192.168.1.21 (192.168.1.21) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 192.168.1.21: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=5.21 ms
    64 bytes from 192.168.1.21: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=3.62 ms
    64 bytes from 192.168.1.21: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=7.20 ms
    64 bytes from 192.168.1.21: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=4.03 ms
    64 bytes from 192.168.1.21: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=5.38 ms
    64 bytes from 192.168.1.21: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=5.31 ms
    64 bytes from 192.168.1.21: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=5.33 ms
    64 bytes from 192.168.1.21: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=5.31 ms
    64 bytes from 192.168.1.21: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=4.83 ms
    64 bytes from 192.168.1.21: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=4.84 ms
    64 bytes from 192.168.1.21: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=4.12 ms
    64 bytes from 192.168.1.21: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=8.28 ms
    64 bytes from 192.168.1.21: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=5.25 ms
    64 bytes from 192.168.1.21: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=5.24 ms
    64 bytes from 192.168.1.21: icmp_seq=15 ttl=64 time=4.21 ms
    64 bytes from 192.168.1.21: icmp_seq=16 ttl=64 time=5.20 ms
    64 bytes from 192.168.1.21: icmp_seq=17 ttl=64 time=4.19 ms
    64 bytes from 192.168.1.21: icmp_seq=18 ttl=64 time=6.17 ms
    --- 192.168.1.21 ping statistics ---
    18 packets transmitted, 18 received, 0% packet loss, time 17096ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 3.624/5.212/8.288/1.101 ms
    OK - fun's over. Spotslayer, can you post the output of ifconfig and iwconfig? (and don't mind ralvez - hide anything you want )

  • Possible conflict/problem if using edk 5.2.0 with plumtree portal 5-0-3 and collaboration v4.0.1?

    Hi,
    We are using plumtree portal v5-0-3 and collaboration v-4.0.1. I have to create a portlet where users can use it to submit a request for a collaboration project to be created. Searching through Plumtree Developer Center, there are documents that show me how to create a collaboration project using edk library. The edk that comes with plumtree portal v5-0-3 doesn't contain the api(s) that I need (for example, com.plumtree.remote.prc.collaboration.project.*). However, the edk 5.2.0 does contain these api(s).
    Are there any possible conflicts/problems if I use the edk 5.2.0 with our existing plumtree portal v5-0-3 and collaboration v4.0.1? If there are, is there any other way that I could get to these api(s) somehow to create collaboration projects?
    Thank you in advance for helping!

    Thank you so much for responding so quickly!
    Is there any api or way that I could use to create a collaboration project without using the Project Explorer? In our scenario, after a user uses the portlet that I describe earlier in the original disscussion message to request the creation of a project, an admin will take a look at the request and click a button to have the project created. This button will somehow trigger some scripts or codes instead of the admin using the Project Explorer to create the project.
    Thanks again for your help!

Maybe you are looking for