Post new asset's evaluation group

I need to post another evaluation group for the company's assets, but AFAK, there are only 5 evaluation groups of assets that's displayed in asset's master data --> allocation tab. When I access the display assets transaction (AS03) it seems that the company only use/activate evaluation 1, 2, and 5. How can I activate the other evaluation group (3 & 4), and update their contents as a desired new evaluation group?
Thanks a lot..

Hi,
  Use TRX OAVA  to enter the contents. With TRX OACB you can change the text of the eval grps.
Kind regards

Similar Messages

  • Asset evaluation groups

    Hi,
    I have created the 4-character evaluation group and 8-character evaluation group in OAVA AND OAV8.
    But where to give the Table fields for these group which are to be get select in the Reporting?
    and please confirm configuration in OAVA and OAV8 is enough to use them in Dynamic selection of the Reporting.
    And can i use them in all the asset reporting Tcodes?
    Regards,
    Vidya

    Hi,
    Yes you can get eval groups in report output... 
    1. try creating a sort version OAVI with eval groups,
    2. use this sort version on selection screen of your report, run the report
    3. Change display variant on the report output to include the new fields (eval groups) and save this variant
    4. use sort version and this variant to see eval groups on your report output.
    Thanks,
    Avi

  • Evaluation Group - Asset Accounting

    Dear All
    While creatinig an Asset Master Record, in the Allocations Tab, there is EvaluationGroup1 ,  
    .........Evaluation Group 5 fields.
    Can anyone explain me with an example.
    Thanks and Regards
    Kanwaljit

    Hi,
    Evaluation groups are majorly used for asset reporting purpose.
    These are part of master record. So you can maintain master data information in this field to identify an asset in asset accounting module.
    In our company we are using evaluation group field as sub asset class.
    Ex: For Asset Class Computers Hardware.this asset class will cover so many things like desktop computers, laptop computers, servers, etc.
    If you want a report for asset balances in this asset class, it will give total balance of the asset class. So in this case if you create one evaluation group for each item (desktops, laptops), you that you can get the balances for that particular item.
    Create one sort variant with evaluation group field ORD41/ORD42/ORD43/ORD43/GDLGRP. (TCODE-S_ALR_87009120 - Define Sort Variants)
    use this sort variant while u are running asset balances report (S_ALR_87011964 - Asset Balances by Asset Class)
    so that you will get balances for each type of asset within one particular asset class. (Create output layout according to your requirement for asset balances report)
    Anyway we are using this field as a category of asset under each asset class. according to your requirement you can use this field for other purpose to identify in asset accounting.
    Keep me posted for further clarifications.
    Thanks,
    Srinu

  • Evaluation Groups for a Specific Asset class

    Hi All,
    After creating the new evaluation groups, is there any way out to link those eval goups with the specific asset class. Please let me know if anybody can give more inputs on this.
    Thanks and regards,
    S.Sumana

    Hi Sumana,
    Evalaution groups are defined at client level, but not asset class level.
    For ex: If you have 4 asset classes. (A, B, C, and D)
    There are 4 evaluation group fields are available, so activate Evl Grp field 1 for asset class A in screen layout for asset master data.
    And Evl Grp field 2 for asset class B and so on...
    While creating evlaution groups, there is a field called NO before evl grp key field. There if you mentain 1, then that evel grp will be available to use in EVl Grp 1 field only.
    Ex: 1        ABC    Test Evl grp
    So you can use ABC evel grp in EVal GRp field 1 only
    If you have more asset classes, then you have go with an validation rule in GGB0 in AA master data level.
    Thanks,
    Srinu

  • Asset Evaluation Group Link to Asset Class

    Hi
    I have a requirement of Linking Asset Evalaution Group with Asset Class.
    For Exapmpe;
    Assetc Class is                Vehicle
    Evaluation group 1            Light, Heavy Medium
    Evaluation Group2             Two, Four,
    Etc.
    At the time of Master creation, Under allocation Tab, i am getting all evaluation groups, I mean, in 1st Group i have more than 50 entries.
    Now the requirement is to get the evaluation group based on the Asset class.
    I do understand, evaluation group creation time,. we don't have option to link with Asset Class.
    Also, there is an option to default Evaluation group for Classes.
    But our requirement is to get filter based on Class, so that at the time of mater data creation, to avoid mistakes..
    Can we meet this requirement ??
    Thanks in advance
    Shinas

    Hi Ajay,
    Thanks for the response..
    You are right, Validation is the only Option.
    But i have lots of evaluation group in each category.
    I dont think client is going to accept it...
    how about AIST0002
    Can we do something on this...

  • Changing Evaluation Group Name for Asset

    Hi All,
    I am trying to change the below screenshot field name from Evaluation Group 2 to Contract Category for Asset Master?
    Kindly advise.
    Regards,
    FJohn

    Re: Asset Master field name change
    Ravi Sankar Venna Nov 8, 2011 2:59 PM (in response to John Peter)
    You can only change the names of evaluation groups
    IMG ==> Financial Accounting ==> Asset Accounting ==> Master Data ==> User Fields ==> Change Key Words in the Evaluation Groups
    You can use customer enhancement AIST0002 in order populate user fields in asset master.
    https://scn.sap.com/message-abuse!input.jspa?objectID=10795474&objectType=2

  • Displaying Evaluation groups field in the asset master data

    Dears,
    The Evaluation group fields in the allocation tab in the asset master data was not displayed in the layout, is there is any harm of displaying it in the production system after 3 years from Go-live.
    i think it should not make any harm, i just want to confirm.
    Regards,
    Ahmed Samir

    Salam Ahmed
    There is no harm.. These fields are used for reportng. They dont impact the process in any way
    Br, Ajay M

  • Can Evaluation Groups In Asset Master Be Set up As Time Dependent Field

    I am just wondering whether evaluation groups can be set up as time dependent and if so, does anyone know how?

    This is not possible.
    The fields from the time dependend tab are stored in a different table with time interfal then the rest from the asset masterdata

  • Post a new asset

    Dear all,
    According to business transaction, I post a new asset:
    1. Post a new asset from AP
    2. Post a new asset by manual
    3. Acquistion from Assets under construction
    Please tell me which transaction I can use to post a new asset though three ways
    Thank in advance
    Minhtb

    Dear Minhtb:
    For posting a new asset
    1 & 2 . First create an a new asset using T.code AS01 and post a new asset using T.code F-90 with vendor.
    If the asset is purchased, MM cycle has to been completed and new asset has to created in AS01.
    From AP, use T.code F-43.
    3. Create the new asset using Asset class:Assets under construction (T.code:AS01) and for  use Capitalization under construction using T.code AIAB & AIBU. For this Configuration has to be competed in Asset Accounting.
    Refer to best pratices in www.help.sap.com.
    Please let me know if you need more information.
    Assign points if useful.
    Regards
    MSReddy

  • Evaluation group issue

    Dear Experts,
    We  have created new Evaluation group in t-code YIDFI_AA0001 (table maintainence) and also in SPRO path Fin Accounting>>Asset Acct>>Master Data>>>User fields>>>Define 4 character evaluatin groups.
    My question here is, does the values maintained in Evaluation group are defaulted in the Asset Master (values like evaluatin group 2 and useful life)??
    Because when we checked one asset, we did not see the new evaluation group and useful life.
    Please explain if we need to manually select the evaluation group in the asset or should it get defaulted.
    Thanks in advance
    Leena...

    Leena-
    The values you maintain in customizing will not default in the master data. In the master data, you will have to select what you want. It works like this. Lets say you have maintained four evaluation groups.
    Evaluation group 1: You maintain some entries for this field like  state abbreviations (MO, IL, CA, AL, NO, FL)
    Evaluation group 2: You maintain some entries for this field like some codes for type of buildings (FBUS - Factory building us, ABUS - Administration building US)
    Evaluation group 3: entries like department codes (ADM - Admin, PRD - Production, etc)
    Now when you create an asset master, you can choose from the entries you maintained in customizing for the respective evaluation group.
    For example, i am planning to purchase an asset for my Missouri office, part of admin building and belongs to production dept.
    So you choose
    Evaluation 1: MO
    Evaluation 2: ABUS
    Evaluation 3: PRD
    So, you will have to maintain them manually when creating master data.
    Hope i have answered your question.
    Shail

  • Post an asset revaluation by ABAWN transaction

    Hi!
    I'd like to post an asset revaluation by ABAWN transaction but error message AAPO106 appears
    "Data inconsistency: mandatory posting depr. area not posted"
    "You tried to post to asset  XXXXXXXX-0 using transaction type ZZ1. According to its Customizing settings, values are required in depreciation area 01, but the current transaction does not supply any values".
    Procedure for System Administration
    Check your Customizing settings to see if transaction type ZZ1 was limited to only certain depreciation areas
    but transaction type ZZ1 is not limited in OAYA transaction
    Could you help me to solve the question?
    Thanks
    Giovanna

    Hi,
    you have to create a transaction type based on transaction type group 89. You find the documentation in the SAP Help Portal for posting new valuation.
    [http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/a7/ed813ee3d32b44e10000000a114084/frameset.htm|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/a7/ed813ee3d32b44e10000000a114084/frameset.htm]
    Regards,
    Markus

  • Need to create Evaluation Group

    Hello Gurus,
    We need to create 2 new evaluation groups.
    The groups to be created are of the format - XX02 and XX13.
    Is OAVA the right T-Code?
    Also how can i test the changes in Q?
    PS - Just starting to understand SAP. So please guide in any way needed for proper questioning/posting next time.
    Thank you!

    Thank you Sitaram,
    I am sure you can help me out with the following query too.
    The client had asked us to create 2 new evaluation groups. And there are 4 possible Evaluation Group Numbers (1-4) under which we can create different evaluation groups.
    So we should be asking the client about the Evaluation Group numbers too? under which they want the new evaluation groups?
    Thanks for the patience!
    Also let me know how i can award points. New to everything

  • Error while creating a new asset in BCC.

    Getting below errors while creating a new asset(catalog/category) through BCC. I have imported the required data from CIM and install.bat from BIZUI.
    /atg/dynamo/servlet/sessiontracking/GenericSessionManager/KDzDSgGcJTS9nwvGpkr9wpyz4nnGKWPYs4QFFJ87Q1BjrTSd4JTG!1759330809!1386235100684
    atg.web.viewmapping.ItemMappingException: Invalid Mapping Mode: AssetManager.default
    [Flex Messaging] 12/05/2013 14:50:45.486 [ERROR] [Message.Remoting] Error processing remote invocation: atg.flex.service.RemoteOperationException: java.lang.NullPointerException
    Kindly suggest...

    As u imported data from CIM for production and publishing(assuming u imported for both), There is no need to run BIZUI.bat mannually, CIM runs this.
    Coming to ur error:
    From the logs  it seems that following mapMode is missing, It's OOTB and should have been loaded while Viewmapping repository data load.
    <add-item item-descriptor="mapMode" id="AmMmDef">
      <set-property name="name"><![CDATA[AssetManager.default]]></set-property>
    </add-item>
    I think there must have been problems during CIM data for publishing environment loading and because of that viemmapping is not loaded properly.
    Refer to this post for initial data load : Re: ATG ENVIRONMENT SETUP ISSUE
    Let us know if u didn't load publishing using CIM, there is some manual work required to load some repository.
    Thanks,
    Nitin.

  • Impairment in new asset fixed (FI-AA)

    We are implementing SAP ECC 6.0  and IFRS scenario. We want posting impairment in a new asset, ABZU Transaction (write-up), in IFRS 60 valuation area. This posting doesnu2019t work because ABZU transaction required accumulate amortization.
    How can we posting impairment in new asset.
    Which transaction type we must be used?
    Net book value positive in area 60 at fiscal year start
    Message no. AA647
    Asset affected: 000600300021-0001

    Dear Sider,
    Transaction ABZU is used normally when you forgot to capitalize an asset in a fiscal year that is now closed. Also, there can be a case where depreciation you calculated in the past were too high. You must now correct this error using a write-up in the current fiscal year.
    In your case, an impairment has to result in reduction in the book value of the asset and not a write-up.
    The impairment can be done using Unplanned depreciation or Manual depreciation.
    Once you enter the Unplanned depreciation, it will get posted after you do a regular AFAB depreciation run.
    Hope it solves your issue.
    Assign points, if useful

  • Transfer of existing assets to new asset class

    Hello Experts,
    We are working in a one-year old implementation of SAP ECC 6.0. A need has raised which is forcing us to transfer an asset with some Depreciation areas (we are currently working with ten areas between Real Depreciation Areas and Derived Depreciation Areas) to a new asset belonging to a new asset class with fewer areas.
    We created the new Asset Class and tested in the quality environment using transaction ABUMN. An example was transferring an asset with two months of depreciation already posted and transferring this one to the new asset at the beginning of the next month.
    The main issue is that we desire that the original asset keeps posting depreciation for the areas that are not transferred. Unfortunately, in our tests in the quality environment we have not accomplished this, what the system does is transfer the values to the new asset and then when you run transaction AFAB the new asset does post depreciation in the fewer areas that the Asset Class it is assigned to has but the original asset does not post any depreciation in any area.
    We tried maintaining the Transaction Types for Transfers that were used by the system by deselecting the 'Deactivate fixed asset' but it did not work and then we tried creating our own Transaction Types but this also was of no use.
    Hope you can shed some light into the issue!

    Dear Sankar,
    Thanks for such a quick reply. I have already considered that (SAP forcing you to transfer the whole asset) as a possibility. Unfortunately, as I have already mentioned here at our implementation we need something like this to happen.
    Let me elaborate. For the fiscal Depreciation Areas we are required to keep the original information on the asset so that the depreciation that is calculated does not change but conversely for the other areas we desire to change the depreciation that is calculated and posted (for example, some assets will suffer a change in the useful life others might merge into one big asset, etc.) but what we definitely need is to keep the original information in the fiscal areas so we can keep reporting that and therefore can keep paying the correct amount to our local tax authorities.
    As I mentioned before I have already considered that as an option. So what we thought was duplicating the assets (through a mass charge of all our assets with the current values), then transferring the 'clones' to assets with fewer Depreciation Areas (we will eliminate the Fiscal Areas since this new assets will be only useful for the non-fiscal depreciation calculation which is the one that will change).
    To sum up: the clones will not generate depreciation because when transferred they will be worthless. The assets they were transferred to will generate the non fiscal depreciation.
    And finally on the original assets we will deactivate the non-fiscal Depreciation Areas so that these assets continue to calculate the fiscal depreciation.
    I would really appreciate your opinion on this strategy or if you think it is a bad or incorrect strategy I would appreciate even more an advise on this matter.
    PS. a little doubt now also strikes me: what is the "Deactivate Fixed Asset" in the Transaction Type definition for?

Maybe you are looking for