Post stop condition duration

Hi
I one to collect 5 seconds of data prior to the start of a test, and then 30 seconds after the end. So I have been using start and stop condition with pre and post logging options. For the start condition, with 5 seconds pre condition every thing is fine, however the post stop condition of 30 sec does not occur and logging stops as soon as the stop condition occurs. Screenshot of the start/stop condition page are attached with a copy of the project.
Has any one any experience of this, what am I doing wrong? Have I misunderstood the way this should work?
thanks
Mark
Attachments:
Start stop conditions.doc ‏320 KB
F139 1lc3p3t4t v2.seproj ‏296 KB

Hi James
Thanks for looking at this, sorry for the delay in replying.
I have reattached the project file and a data set. I've been messing around with the settings, but still no joy. In the current project I am asking for 30s of data after the stop condition occurs but it still is not happening. In Data View for 'P Red' the stop condiditon occurs as specified when the pressure goes below 1 bar, and then logging ceases a couple of seconds after that. In the meta data for the logs it specifies the start and stop conditions, and it also specifies that I want 5 s pre start, however there is no mention of my post stop requirements
Does the 30s I specified really mean 30 seconds after the stop event, it wouldn't be something like stop after 30s or at the stop condition, which ever is longer? Is it possible for you to look at the code or the logic in the programming of this feature?
thanks
Mark
Attachments:
F139 1lc3p3t4t v2.seproj ‏288 KB
23092011_113247.zip ‏161 KB

Similar Messages

How to block post price conditions in purchase order

I need to block post price conditions in the purchase order, after doing MIGO.
The problem is that somtimes buyers people go to the purachse order with ME22N, even if MIGO has already been made for this purachse order. They change The amount of certain price conditions in some or all the posts of the purchase. when people of accounting receive the invoice, there are problems of price differences.
i need help to do it
Thank you in advance for your help

The system will not allow to change the price once goods receipt takes place on that particular order. It happens only when we reverse the reciepts and make the po open. In such case the persons can change with ME22N. Its simple that only authorised user to have this transaction code and other users should not have this transaction code authorization.

How to block post price conditions in purchase order after doing MIGO

I need to block post price conditions in the purchase order, after doing MIGO.
The problem is that somtimes buyers people go to the purachse order with ME22N, even if MIGO has already been made for this purachse order. They change The amount of certain price conditions in some or all the posts of the purchase. when people of accounting receive the invoice, there are problems of price differences.
i need help to do it
Thank you in advance for your help

The system will not allow to change the price once goods receipt takes place on that particular order. It happens only when we reverse the reciepts and make the po open. In such case the persons can change with ME22N. Its simple that only authorised user to have this transaction code and other users should not have this transaction code authorization.

Services are in stop condition

Hi,
We installed Dev & Quality systems for PI/XI-7.0 on same host,
We are taking central SLD on Dev for Quality system,
We are following note-940309,regarding this note we have to change the client for the following services 1) AI_DIRECTORY_<sid> 2) AI_RUNTIME_<SID> 3) LCRSAPRFC_<SID> 4) SAPSLDAPI_<SID>, after changing the client-100,these services are in stop condition,
which Gateway number we have to give either DEV & Quality System,
what else we have to change
when we are execute tcode SXMB_IFR on Quality system it is pointing to DEV system,
regards,
haribabu

Hi,
We installed Dev & Quality systems for PI/XI-7.0 on same host,
We are taking central SLD on Dev for Quality system,
We are following note-940309,regarding this note we have to change the client for the following services 1) AI_DIRECTORY_<sid> 2) AI_RUNTIME_<SID> 3) LCRSAPRFC_<SID> 4) SAPSLDAPI_<SID>, after changing the client-100,these services are in stop condition,
which Gateway number we have to give either DEV & Quality System,
what else we have to change
when we are execute tcode SXMB_IFR on Quality system it is pointing to DEV system,
regards,
haribabu

PCA Manual Posting - Stopping posting to certain account

Dear experts,
How can I stop usage of a certain account for manual PCA postings thru 9KE0. This is only for manual, the other transactions should be able to post. Any inputs, highly appreciated.
Thanks

Andreas,
I did the following steps:
Defined the validation in Transaction GGB0 ->Special Purpose Ledger-->Line item level i.e. Call-up point 4.
Then I assigned the validation to a company code in transaction: GCVV (IMG Path: Financial Accounting>Special Purpose Ledger>Basic Settings>Validation>Maintain Local Validation)
The transaction you mentioned, GCVX is for assigning substitutions.
Pls let me know if i took correct steps.
Andreas,
I figured it out. Actually I was using GLU1-ACCOUNT instead of GLU1-RACCT. My question is solved.
Regards,
Edited by: Vishal Thakur on Jan 12, 2008 1:13 PM

Recording stopped mas duration for the file has been reached

Has anyone else seen this message, "Recording stopped because the maximum duration for the file has been reached" this is happening on 10.6.2 server and client all updates applied. The File from podcast capture is not saved, it just disappears We are using a Hitachi camera. Any ideas?

This problem has been reported before, here: http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1704655 . For some reason, that thread was marked as "answered", even though it doesn't seem to have actually been answered.
I've just experienced the problem myself. I'm using OS X 10.6.3 with QuickTime Player 10.0 (113), capturing audio and video over FireWire from a PAL VHS deck via a Canopus ADVC-55. I'm using the "High" setting to record in QuickTime Player.
Sometimes I'm able to capture indefinitely long amounts of video; sometimes, though, I get a "Recording stopped because the maximum duration for the file has been reached" error after capturing only a few seconds. This variability occurs not only between VHS tapes; it also can occur when using the same source VHS tape (the same parts of the tape, even!) repeatedly.
Apple, this appears to be a QuickTime bug. Please investigate and fix it!

How to post statistical conditions to accounting ?

Hi SD Gurus
Our client requirement is that the net value is posted to two GL accounts i.e., 10% of net value is to be posted to one GL account and 90% of net value is to be posted to one GL account.
In my pricing procedure net value is determined in 700 STEP so i defined two condition types in 800 and 820 types and had taken the value as 700 step as reference and in the pricing procedure the two condition types r working well but the net value showing double i.e., it was adding the value in 800 step and 820 step with 700 step value. in order to rectify that what configuration steps I have to do.I need the solution very urgent.
When i make the condition types in 800 and 820 steps as statistical, i am unable to post to accounts.
Please suggest.
Cheers,
"CLN"

Dear Chakravarthy
In your Pricing Procedure, insert a field between Steps 700 and 800 and define it as "Sub Total". Against this new step, enter "700" in both "From" and "To" field and try.
Meanwhile, if you want any condition value to be posted to accounting, you have to untick the respective condition types. Then only, it will flow to accounts.
Thanks
G.Lakshmipathi

[865pe neo3-f] POST stops at booting attempt

hi all..i need help with my 865pe neo3-f mobo..1st of all, my specs are:
p4 530 3.0 ghz
1 gb ddr pc 3200 ram
80 gb maxtor pata
80 gigs seagate patd
soundblaster audigy2 platinum
geforce 4 mx 64 mb
500 watt psu
asus cdrw 40x12x32
liteon dvd 16x
if there's any more info needed, just let me know..
problem:
a friend of mine plugged his usb hard drive to my front usb port, the next thing i know, my windows xp freezes..
i reset but the mobo freezes while the d bracket says that it was trying to boot to os (1st led red n the other green) according to the manual..
i've tried booting with only 1 ram stick, video card n cpu but no luck..the mobo still stops when it's trying to boot most of the time..ocassionally i can get all led green but that's like success in every 15+ attempts..
please help me if anyone has a solution for my problem..thank u..

thank u for the reply..i will post the psu spec later...
anyway the mobo's bios has been cleared many times but the problem just won't go away..i've disconnected the usb hdd also..
i can't get by to the bios post screen..the mobo stops at exactly when it's trying to boot (d-led: 1st led red, the rest green)..so in essence, whenever i turned on my pc, it stops when it's trying to boot and restart itself..
by the way, the mobo's bios is the latest v5.3..
i will post the power spec when i get home..thank u so much..

Z77A-GD55 Post Stop Error "CA" (Solved)

Brand new motherboard that I pulled out of the box yesterday to rebuilt my PC. I upgraded the BIOS to the latest version, 1.7. One out of every two to three times when I reboot, the POST process will stop with a blank screen and just the characters "CA" (without the quotes) down in the bottom right hand corner. Anyone know what this stop message/error is?
Here's my machine specs:
Mobo: MSI Z77A-GD55
CPU: Core i5 3570K
Memory: 32 GB G.SKill Ripjaws X Series (4 x 8 GB), DDR3 1600 PC3 12800, F3-12800CL10D-16GBXL
DVD/CD: LG GH22NS70 DVD-RW
OS Drive: 256GB Samsung 830 (MZ-7PC256B/WW | Firmware CXM03B1Q)
Data Drive: Seagate Barracuda 7200 RPM 1 TB Drive (ST31000528AS | CC49 Firmware)
Video Cards: Sapphire Radeon HD 7970 OC 3 GB
Edit: Just as a followup, I did run both the Windows Memory Diagnostics and MemTest86+ overnight last night and it went through 3 full passes on all 32 GB of RAM without any errors, so I don't believe it's a memory issue.

Don't see CA in the list, but lets start with the memory since you have so much.
Start by doing a full cmos clear.
Then set the dramv to 1.65
Command Rate: 2t
Then retest.
If ok, enable xmp and retest.
If the problem persists, update to the beta bios w/ the forum flash tool. Use option 1 and point it at the entire compressed archive. This will flash the ME extension as well. Once the flash is complete, you will need to re-install the Management Engine drivers in windows.
>>Beta BIOSes<<
>>Use the MSI HQ Forum USB flasher<<

Posting in Condition types

Dear Sirs,
I have created two discount condition types in
PO. My requirement is to block entry in
one while there is an entry in other condition
type.
Pl. explain me if it is possible.
Thanking you
With regrds
Mrinmoy Chakraborty

u mena to sa that user should not be able to mention any value for that condition type in po
go to tcode m/06 and there select the condition type row and click the detail button and put the restriction value for the manual changes in your condition typ
or make that condition type as statstical

Do{}while stopping condition

Hi,
I am having trouble with my stopping statement! I want all the items to evaluate to true before it stops:
do{...}while(px!=x && py!=y && entryDir!=S)
I am tracing around the outline of a character, the trouble is as soon as it get to the top of the letter and the entryDir changes it stops...
So it should stop when px = x, py = y and the entry direction into the starting pixel (x,y) was S (south).
Thanks, Ron
Message was edited by:
cake

Here is the rest of the code, just to make sure...
public void getMooreBlob(int x, int y){
     char N='N', E='E', S='S', W='W';
     int px=x, py=y, nextMove=1;
     downSampleLeft = downSampleRight = x;
     downSampleTop = downSampleBottom = y;
     System.out.println("left="+x+"right="+x+"top="+y+"bottom="+y);
     //I am always going to be entering from the south to start, scanning down
     char entryDir = S;
     do{
     //pixel positions relative to p
          switch (nextMove)
               //move1
               case 1:
                    if(loadImg.getRGB((px+1),(py-1))!=-1){
                         entryDir='E';
                         px=px+1; py=py-1;
                         setP(px, py);
                         nextMove=7;
                         break;
               //move2
               case 2:
                    if(loadImg.getRGB((px+1),py)!=-1){
                         entryDir='S';
                         px=px+1; py=py;
                         setP(px, py);
                         nextMove=1;
                         break;
               //move3
               case 3:
                    if(loadImg.getRGB((px+1),(py+1))!=-1){
                         entryDir='S';
                         px=px+1;py=py+1;
                         setP(px, py);
                         nextMove=1;
                         break;
               //move4
               case 4:
                    if(loadImg.getRGB(px,(py+1))!=-1){
                         entryDir='W';
                         px=px;py=py+1;
                         setP(px, py);
                         nextMove=3;
                         break;
               //move5
               case 5:
                    if(loadImg.getRGB((px-1),(py+1))!=-1){
                         entryDir='W';
                         px=px-1;py=py+1;
                         setP(px, py);
                         nextMove=3;
                         break;
               //move6
               case 6:
                    if(loadImg.getRGB((px-1),py)!=-1){
                         entryDir='N';
                         px=px-1;py=py;
                         setP(px, py);
                         nextMove=5;
                         break;
               //move7
               case 7:
                    if(loadImg.getRGB((px-1),(py-1))!=-1){
                         entryDir='N';
                         px=px-1;py=py-1;
                         setP(px, py);
                         nextMove=5;
                         break;
               //move8
               case 8:
                    if(loadImg.getRGB(px,(py-1))!=-1){
                         entryDir='E';
                         px=px;py=py-1;
                         setP(px, py);
                         nextMove=7;
                         break;
               default:
                    nextMove++;
                    if(nextMove==9)nextMove=1;
                    break;
     }while(px!=x && py!=y && entryDir!=S);
}

MIGO - Accounting - Condition type for Mark up posting to Inventory account

Hi All,
We have a requirement for posting intercompany Stock transfer between Company A and B, and the transfer price will be Moving Average Price (say $ 100) + Mark up (say 25% i.e., 25) of supplying plant.
Created a new PO pricing procedure, and created a new Accrual condition type ZMRK for markup and made it statistical posting. Also in the pricing procedure the Condition type we assigned an Account key ZM1 and Accrual Key ZMA. we tried posting the Goods receipts in the receiving Company B, and it is posting the following entry :
Invetory A/C                 DR         125               (note: Account key ZM1 was not considered for debit account for markup)
GR/IR     A/C                          CR      100
Markup Accrual   A/C             CR        25
REQUIREMENT: Our requirement is that the Mark-UP condition should not hit Inventory Account and should be debited to I/C Mark Up account (assigned to Account key ZM1) and entry should be as below:
Inventory A/C           DR         100
Markup A/C            DR           25
GR/IR     A/C                  CR            125 (accrual is not required, if we can include the markup into GR/IR account)
OR
Inventory A/C        DR       100
Markup      A/C        DR         25
GR/IR         A/C               CR       100
Markup Accrual A/C       CR         25
NOTE: The Material is maintained as Moving Average Price and we dont want to add the Mark Up cost into the MAP of the receiving plant.
Please check and let me know if there is a way to do a condition type in PO pricing procedure to solve the issue of not hitting the inventory posting for condition record or any other way to handle this requirement.
Thanks in advance,
Surya

If you dont want the mark up to come in invoice separately, why do you want it to hit a GR / IR account? ( in short why use del cost condition )
If hitting gr / ir is not a requirement and you just need to acrue it, try the following
PB00 to take 100
create 2 conditions one positve and one negative ( accrual, without condition category ) to take the value 10
the + and - will cancel in the inventory account; you can accrue to different accrual accounts

Post Goods Receipt(PGI) with custom condition types on purchase order(PO)

Hi all,
I am trying to post goods receipt with custom conditions on the PO. One of the custom conditions is freight (delivery cost). The value on this condition will post to a different G/L account (freight provision account, rather than GR/IR).
My problem is, when posting this GR, the cost center assigned in the PO under 'account assignment' is not used for posting the custom condition, which I really need it to happen.
Simply put, I want all postings from this PO inherit values in 'account assignment'.
I have been looking into configurations in automatic posting and condition types, but I still have no clue where I can make it happen. Do I have to use BADI?
Thanks.

Delivey cost condition will be posted to accrual accounts not to the cost center.

MM Pricing procedure - Condition type post to different GL account in MAP

Hi All,
We have a requirement for posting intercompany Stock transfer between Company A and B, and the transfer price will be Moving Average Price (say $ 100) + Mark up (say 25% i.e., 25) of supplying plant.
Created a new PO pricing procedure, and created a new Accrual condition type ZMRK for markup and made it statistical posting. Also in the pricing procedure the Condition type we assigned an Account key ZM1 and Accrual Key ZMA. we tried posting the Goods receipts in the receiving Company B, and it is posting the following entry :
Invetory A/C DR 125 (note: Account key ZM1 was not considered for debit account for markup)
GR/IR A/C CR 100
Markup Accrual A/C CR 25
REQUIREMENT: Our requirement is that the Mark-UP condition should not hit Inventory Account and should be debited to I/C Mark Up account (assigned to Account key ZM1) and entry should be as below:
Inventory A/C DR 100
Markup A/C DR 25
GR/IR A/C CR 125 (accrual is not required, if we can include the markup into GR/IR account)
OR
Inventory A/C DR 100
Markup A/C DR 25
GR/IR A/C CR 100
Markup Accrual A/C CR 25
NOTE: The Material is maintained as Moving Average Price and we dont want to add the Mark Up cost into the MAP of the receiving plant.
Please check and let me know if there is a way to do a condition type in PO pricing procedure to solve the issue of not hitting the inventory posting for condition record or any other way to handle this requirement.
Thanks in advance,
Surya

Hey surya,
I am also facing the same issue. Can you pls let me know whether you achieved this using any standard configuration.

Posting condition type as noted item through RERAPP

HI Experts
I want to post a condition type as a noted item through RERAPP.
Can this be done. I see that there is only a provision for advance payment. My requirement is that the condition should be posted as a noted item which will then be used as a reference for incoming payment in Finance.
Awaiting your expert opinion.
Regards
n_nn
Edited by: n_nn on Oct 8, 2009 2:52 PM

Hi,
it is not possible to post noted items with RERAPP.
Regards, Franz

Post stop condition duration

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for