Post xp installition issues...

hello. i installed xp pro corp sp2 on my mac book on a 15gb ntfs partition. some question...
i am not able to use the trackpad. i can move the mouse pointer but cant click through it. i am forced to use the button. also, i am not able to right click. the boot camp control panel has no option for the mouse. only for the keyboard.
i can 'read' the xp partition on mac but the mac partition is simply not detected.
in the realtek control panel, when i play the test sounds the right speaker plays more sound that the left. i checked for the balance it is in middle.
how do i set the default os?
i am not able to install sp3. it says i need atleast 4mb free space whereas i have 12gb free space!

AceNeerav:
Thats a lot of questions in one post so I will try and answer as many as I can.
am not able to use the trackpad. i can move the mouse pointer but cant click through it. i am forced to use the button. also, i am not able to right click.
This is normal at this time. The mouse trackpad is somewhat limited at this time when using Windows on a Mac. To *Right Click* simply place TWO fingers on the trackpad and Click on the button.
i can 'read' the xp partition on mac but the mac partition is simply not detected.
This is normal too. OSx partition is HFS+ and therefore will not be read by Windows Operating Systems. There is commercial software available out there that can make this possible and it is called [MacDrive|http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/win/13831] and is available for $49.95.
In the realtek control panel, when i play the test sounds the right speaker plays more sound that the left. i checked for the balance it is in middle.
Right Click on the Sound icon in the system tray and choose properties. Find the settings for Wave files and ensure that the balance is set correctly.
how do i set the default os?
You can do that from either operating system. From OSx choose Preferences and then choose boot camp. There you have an option to setup the default startup disk. From Windows, click on the boot camp icon in the system tray and then set the default startup disk.
i am not able to install sp3. it says i need atleast 4mb free space whereas i have 12gb free space!
This will require some registry work to fix. The solution is posted [Here|http://www.windowsreference.com/general/error-there-is-not-enough-disk-space-wh en-installing-sp3>.
Good Luck.
Axel F.

Similar Messages

Issue while posting using goods issue for delivery type NL

Hello Experts,
I have created an outbound delivery for an intra-company transfer (within same company code) between two plants. The delivery type in NL (replinishment delivery)
When i am trying to post the goods issue from supplying plant, I am getting following error
"Account type K is not defined for document type WL".
Delivery type NL should not be used to issue stock to vendor but I am not issuing it to any external vendor , issuing the stokc only to a receiving plant.
Please help to understand why i am getting this error.
Regards,
Nish.

Hi,
If you are doing an STO Scenario, Check whether you have created the supplying plant as a vendor.
The Vendor Account group should be plants.
Also check whether you have given the plant in the vendor master Purchasing Data - Extras tab in the menu click on add purchasing data & check.
If you haven't assigned this, do the same & create a fresh STO & check.
Hope it will work.
Thanks & Regards,

Posting multiple goods issues against the same delivery

Hello gurus,
We are a fashion apparel company using ECC 6.0 and would like to know if it is possible to post mutliple goods issues against the same delivery?
I will explain the business requirement.
- We create a stock transport order to deliver 400 units of merchandise to on or our retail stores (STO is created and processed to a delivery).
- This information is passed down to our warehouse management system (which is not SAP)
- Our warehouse management system has the ability to split a delivery into multiple shipment when needed. For example, our warehouse may only be able to complete 250 units for our morning shipment and will therefore pick, pack and post this. This will feed back into SAP and process a 641 movement so that the units now show as "in transit". This is needed so that our stores can process the ASN and move the units into their inventory when they receive the merchandise later that day.
- During the afternoon, our warehouse will process the remaining 150 units and will ship this to our store later in the evening or next day.
Currently, we are not able to process another goods issue against a delivery as we close out the delivery during the first goods issue. We would prefer not to have to generate a new delivery for our DC and let them continue to process against the same delivery, but we are unsure how to configure this.
Any help or guideance would be extremely appreciated
Thanks in advance

Hi RJ,
First of all sorry to write such a lengthy reply,In one line if i want to summerize then it is not possible with standard SAP however we can achieve this by writing some piece of code in both the system
AS - IS
               Business process
          From business process point of view you are right that once the pick & pack is in process it is not advisable to create a new delivery document for balance quantity and share the same with WMS as then they have to create a new document in WMS and start picking based on that rather then the old delivery document number. if i am in your position then i can give a thought like this
e.g.
Delivery                                                  - 100 Unit
Shipment confirmation from WMS            -   60 Unit
Change in delievry quanity / Pick qty        -   60 Unit
Invoice from SAP                                    -   60 Unit
Second confirmation from WMS                          -   40 Unit
Change in the existing delivery quantity                -   Now here we have two option either
1) Change the delivery quantity / Pick qty to (60+40) =100 or
2) Remove the 60 and update 40 as delivery and pick quantity
Pros & Cons
if you will select option 1 then furhter invoice will happen for 100 unit which is incorrect as physically you are shipping only 40 unit
if you are selecting option 2 then the document flow is incorrect as you don't have history(in SAP) for the 60 unit which was shipped earlier
Solution ::
so in my opinion the best option is to create a seperate delivery document (store the old delviery number in one of the field of the new delivery and pass the same to custom segment of the IDoc) transmit the IDoc to WMS write the validation logic in WMS
Find the record with old deliver number in the WMS system, check the status whether it is active or inactive
if it is acitive Validate the Material + qty with the WMS record(Material + balance quantity) if both are same then pass the new deliery number to custom field of the WMS table
At the time of confirming back to the SAP, Write a piece of code in SAP that if the incoming idoc custom field(new delivery number) field is populated then ignore the orignal document number and post the document using the new delivery document number
Hope this help

BAPI to post a Goods issue with relation to Sales Order?

Hi Everyone,
After creating a delivery order, I need a BAPI to automatically post a goods issue for this DO.
I tried using BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE but it returns the message 'Goods Movement not possible with mvmt type 601'.
Any advice?
Best Regards,
Junwen

Hi John,
My data are as follows:
GOODSMVT HEADER:
PSTNG_DATE: 30.09.2004
DOC_DATE: 30.09.2004
REF_DOC_NO: had tried 1014000359 or empty
GOODSMVT_CODE: 03
GOODSMVT_ITEM:
MATERIAL: HP0121002
PLAN: 1010
STGE: 10FG
BATCH: BATCH1
MOV: 601
CUSTOMER: 180017
ENTRY_QNT: 1
ENT_UOM: PC
ENT_UOM_ISO: PC
DELIV_NUMB: 1014000359
DELIV_ITEM: 000001
From your feedback, it is possible to use the BAPI to create a goods issue for movement type 601?
Best Regards,
Junwen

Post a good issue against an outbound delivery with movement type 601 K

Hello,
according to my business scenario I need to manage the stock of different vendors into the client's location (plant) at storage location level and I need to post the good issue against an outbound delivery to decrease the stock level.
Since the owner of the goods isn't my client the item is managed only at quantity level (not value) so I'm not interesed in the accounting document.
To do it I'm using the functionality related to the vendor consignment stock but I'm not able to post the good issue against an outbound delivery using the movemement type 601 and the special stock indicator equal to K.
In particular I've tried in two different ways:
- setup the consignment stock indicator (= K) into the sales item category, but when I post the goods issue the system is not able to find out the right vendor
- to create a stock determination rule instead of the setting previous described, but the system display an error message (Fld selectn for mvmt type 601 / acct L534200770 differs for Cost center (010) ) even if the accouting is not relevant in my scenario
Can you suggest me how the system has to be setup in order to cover my requirements?
Thanks in advance,
Alessandro

Hi,
Please clarrify which material type you are using in this scenario? I suggest you to use material type UNBW (no value updation will be there) and create a material master. Use special stock indicator K. Proceed with 601K to do GI. Hope it works. Thanking you.

Error when posting an goods issue of movement type 501: order not contain

I tried to post an goods issue of movment type 501 to a stock transport order. But I get the error as below.
Document 4500000130 does not contain any selectable items
Message no. M7 064
Diagnosis
The document or item entered cannot be adopted.
Possible reasons for this are:
The document items have already been processed
(Suggest zero lines indicator set?).
the document items have been deleted or are blocked.
the document items have been created for a different plant.
(for reservations only) movements are not yet allowed for the reservation items.
(for reservations only) the document items are retrograde components of the order. These are posted using the order confirmations.
The document is an R/2 document.
Procedure
Make sure your entries are correct.
If the system has already processed the total quantity, you can set the Suggest zero lines indicator. The system will suggest the quantity zero for the items that have already been processed.
If you have entered a particular item, cancel the item. If you do not enter an item, the system searches all of the open items in the document.
If the document is a purchase order, production order or a reservation, you can enter search criteria in the dialog box.
You access the dialog box by choosing the menu option Enter with reference on the initial screen.
If the document is an R/2 document, you have to cancel it manually by entering the reversal movement type.
How can I proceed to post?
Thanks,
Eda

Hi
Go to T.code MB1A, enter the required movement type, Plant and storage location and then click,
The push button of Reservation on the tool bar for refereing the reservation or
The push button of order on the tool bar for refereing the Production order.
Cheers
Kris

How to get material's last posting date of issuing to production order?

Hi,
In my scenario, I need to get material's last posting date of issuing to production order (e.g. mov. typ. 261).
I tried to select the material documents whose movement type is 261, and restrict the posting date from month to month each time, until the first material document is selected.
But this method seems quite inefficient.
What kind of algorithm is more effient to do this?
Thanks
Wesley

Hi,
select max( budat )
from mkpf
into gv_budat
where mblnr in ( select mblnr
                     from aufm
                    where aufnr = gv_aufnr "(Prod. Order)
                        and matnr = gv_matnr "(Issued Material)
                        and bwart = '261' ).
Edited by: Azeem Ahmed Matte on Mar 12, 2010 12:33 PM

Error in posting a goods issue

Hi everyone,
We're encountering an issue with posting. When trying to post a goods issue from a delivery via VL02N, an error message is displayed : "The document does not contain any item.". although it does contain items.
Do you have an idea of why thie error would appear ?
Thanks in advance.

Hello,
Can you check whether
1. you have picked the item,if not then pick the material and goto Edit>Confirm pick order>All items, or
2. activated warehouse management. if yes then you need to create a transfer order with reference to that delivery.
Hope it helps.
Regards,
Priyanka

Posting a "goods issue" msg NR751

Hi All,
posting a goods issue, sap gives me the message NR751...
But the number range has been created ...
I can't post the goods issue
Could anyone help me?
thanks
Gandalf

Ciao Gandalf, ( e' sempre un piacere incontrare un fan del signore degli anelli)
the error NR751 have 3 variables
-> For object &1 &2, number range interval &3 does not exist
Please, go to transaction SNRO and enter RF_BELEG (I suppose this is the object in the error) in the 'Object' field.
In the menu path press Go To -> Number Ranges.
Enter the relevant Company Code. Do you have an entry here for the interval &3?
Mauro

Post a goods issue

Hi Everyone,
After creating a delivery order, I need a BAPI to automatically post a goods issue for this DO.
I tried using BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE . I haven't errors but the Goods issue has not been posted for the delivery.
Any advice?
Best Regards,
Nadia

One way is possible, but it has also negative aspects:
You can set back the current period to a required period. There is a init repor in the customizing of MM. I would set the current one back to june, so you could post im may.
After done this, the normal period report for setting the next month can be run.
But: doing this, current values and the last period are at least the same. You loose one historical period....
I would try this in a test system.
Regards
Uwe Werner

Is it possible to post a good issue movement before post the good receipt m

Is it possible to post a good issue movement before post the good receipt movement for the same material, into the same period?
We try to explain better, today we've done a test:
Step 1 :   We have created a material, wich material type is HAWA, with price control V, and 1 euro for 1 ST.
Step 2 :   We have post a good receipt movement, 561 of this material with 1000 ST of stock, and on posting date: 05.05.2011.
Step 3 :   Then, we have post a good issue movement, 562 of the same material, with 500 ST of stock, on posting date: 01.05.2011 ( so that, the posting date of the 562 is before from the posting date of 561).
And it has worked, so that on trx "mb51" for this material we saw:
PLANT1-----STO1---- 562----- Mat. Doc.101.05.2011--
500-   ST
PLANT1-----STO1---561Mat. Doc.205.05.2011--
1000 ST
And with "fbl3n" for this G/L account , the same situation:
G/LAccount1--DocumentNo101.05.2011--99--
500- EUR
G/LAccount1--DocumentNo205.05.2011--89--
1000 EUR
We don't like this fact, someone knows how is it possible? The negative stocks aren't flagged!!!!
Edited by: Ariana Serrano Aguila on May 5, 2011 5:50 PM

Hi,
Though sap allows like this ,, the document created will be with the date of the actual posting system date. If you look into the MSEG table you will get to know this.
In theory .. this kind of practice should not be allowed .
since this is a 562 which is a individual entry may be system would have allowed.you try a 102 .
Regards,

Is it possible to post a good issue movement before post the good receipt

Is it possible to post a good issue movement before post the good receipt movement for the same material, into the same period?
We try to explain better, today we've done a test:
Step 1 :   We have created a material, wich material type is HAWA, with price control V, and 1 euro for 1 ST.
Step 2 :   We have post a good receipt movement, 561 of this material with 1000 ST of stock, and on posting date: 05.05.2011.
Step 3 :   Then, we have post a good issue movement, 562 of the same material, with 500 ST of stock, on posting date: 01.05.2011 ( so that, the posting date of the 562 is before from the posting date of 561).
And it has worked, so that on trx "mb51" for this material we saw:
PLANT1           STO1         562           Mat. Doc.1           01.05.2011            500- ST
PLANT1           STO1         561           Mat. Doc.2           05.05.2011           1000 ST
And with "fbl3n" for this G/L account , the same situation:
G/LAccount1            DocumentNo1            01.05.2011        99            500- EUR
G/LAccount1            DocumentNo2            05.05.2011        89            1000 EUR
We don't like this fact, someone knows how is it possible? The negative stocks aren't flagged!!!!
Edited by: Ariana Serrano Aguila on May 5, 2011 5:50 PM

SAP only checks if there is enough quantity in the period (month), it does not check if there is enough stock at date level.
there is no stock stored in any table for a given date. SAP would need to run the logic of MB5B to calculate the stock at a certain date, this would cause tremendous performance issues.
you either have to do this calculation yourself in a user exit, or you better train your users.

Post Dated Cheques Issues

Dear All
How to activate SAP_ICC_THAILAND option for other than thailand. Our requirement is post dated cheques processing for AR that similar to Thailand.
If we create special GL accounts for PDCs and how to post when due.
Thanks in advance
Madhawa

Dear All,
Received inputs for the required queries. However, issue is answered.
1. Promise-to-Pay : Only one comment can be given for Sales Bill, if there are several Post dated Cheques / Issues for Single transaction.
Soln : In this situation consolidated value and last date of the PDC (Postdated cheque) has to maintain in SAP.
2. Cancellation of 'Promise-to-Pay' is not possible.
Soln : You cannot cancel the Promise to pay but you can always withdraw the same if status is open
3. When & How does the 'Promise-to-Pay' get Broken.
Soln: If customer fails to pay by promised date system will automatically update as Broken in status column.
4. Details required for Column Broken & Distribution.
Soln: Distribution functionality provided by SAP to select multiple Invoices of the Customer and maintain the Promise to pay value Invoice wise rather than doing one by one.
Thanks to my friend Mr. Srikanthraj Jois.
Thanks n regards,
Vijayashree

How to amend a do an post a goods issue by using BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CONFIRM

Dear All,
As advised in this forum ,I want to used BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CONFIRM_DEC to amend my DO and post a goods issue. However, I keep getting error message "error in document 80000970 item 000010 (quantity consistency check)"
code:
DATA:
W_HEADER_DATA LIKE BAPIOBDLVHDRCON,
W_HEADER_CONTROL LIKE BAPIOBDLVHDRCTRLCON,
DELIVERY_NUM LIKE BAPIOBDLVHDRCON-DELIV_NUMB,
W_ITEM_DATA LIKE BAPIOBDLVITEMCON,
I_ITEM_DATA LIKE BAPIOBDLVITEMCON OCCURS 0,
I_RETURN LIKE BAPIRET2 OCCURS 0.
DATA :
W_RETURN LIKE BAPIRET2,
L_RETURN LIKE SY-SUBRC.
PERFORM OUTBOUND_DELIVERY
CHANGING
    L_RETURN.
FORM OUTBOUND_DELIVERY
CHANGING
        L_OUT_RETURN   LIKE SY-SUBRC.
DATA:
V_LOGSTR(128)    TYPE C.                       "LOG ÄÚÈÝ
DELIVERY_NUM = '80000970'.    "DO NUMBER
"HEAD DATA PART
W_HEADER_DATA-DELIV_NUMB = '80000970'.
W_HEADER_DATA-GROSS_WT = 240.
W_HEADER_DATA-NET_WEIGHT = 240 .
W_HEADER_DATA-UNIT_OF_WT = 'G'.
"HEAD DATA CONTROL PART
W_HEADER_CONTROL-DELIV_NUMB = '80000970'.
W_HEADER_CONTROL-GROSS_WT_FLG = 'X'.
W_HEADER_CONTROL-NET_WT_FLG = 'X'.
W_HEADER_CONTROL-VOLUME_FLG = 'X'.
W_HEADER_CONTROL-POST_GI_FLG = 'X'.
"ITEM DATA PART
CLEAR W_ITEM_DATA.
W_ITEM_DATA-DELIV_NUMB = '80000970'.
W_ITEM_DATA-DELIV_ITEM = '000010'.
W_ITEM_DATA-MATERIAL = '0015223'.
W_ITEM_DATA-BATCH = '20040202'.
W_ITEM_DATA-DLV_QTY = 1.
W_ITEM_DATA-SALES_UNIT = 'CAR'.
APPEND W_ITEM_DATA TO I_ITEM_DATA.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CONFIRM_DEC'
EXPORTING
    HEADER_DATA                = W_HEADER_DATA
    HEADER_CONTROL             = W_HEADER_CONTROL
    DELIVERY                   = DELIVERY_NUM
TABLES
HEADER_DEADLINES           =
    ITEM_DATA                  = I_ITEM_DATA
    RETURN                     = I_RETURN
LOOP AT I_RETURN INTO W_RETURN.
    IF W_RETURN-TYPE = 'E'.
      L_OUT_RETURN = 4.
      MESSAGE   ID     W_RETURN-ID
                TYPE   W_RETURN-TYPE
                NUMBER W_RETURN-NUMBER
                WITH   W_RETURN-MESSAGE_V1
                       W_RETURN-MESSAGE_V2
                       W_RETURN-MESSAGE_V3
                       W_RETURN-MESSAGE_V4
                INTO   V_LOGSTR.
      WRITE :/ V_LOGSTR.
    ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
ENDFORM.
Does anybody have a hint to the cause of the error message?
There's no problem to do a goods issue manually in VL02n for the delivery.
Best Regards,
ERIC XU

Hi Lin,
   he has changed the commit value to 'X' in DEBUG mode.
If you just want to test it in se37, you have to keep a break point in the WS_DELIVERY_UPDATE_2 fm, and give the value of COMMIT = 'X' in debugging.
If you want to do the same in a program, you have to cal the fm: bapi_transaction_commit after the call to the BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CONFIRM_DEC bapi.
Regards,
ravi

I've read others' posts on this issue and still need an answer that works. Safari keeps dropping wireless; no issues on a Dell laptop with XP in same room. Cleared cache, etc. - any other ideas?

I've read others' posts on this issue and still don't have an answer that works! Safari keeps dropping wireless connection every 5 - 10 minutes (it's gotten progressively worse over the last month). My husband, sitting 10 ft across from me, has no issues on a Dell laptop with XP so doesn't appear to be the router or ISP. Safari v5.0.6 Mac OS 10.5.8. Cleared cache, tried kill commands in Terminal, restarts, etc. Only restarting seems to keep it at bay for a period, but then it will start again. Any other ideas?

You posted a question about a problem connecting a Mac to a wireless router. You have an old Dell laptop that works well with that router.
I pointed you to a brief discussion with another poster who had a problem connecting a Mac to a wireless router. He had an old Dell laptop that worked well with that router. I suggested he upgrade the router firmware. He upgraded it, and the problem was solved. Another poster in that thread did the same thing, and his problem was also solved. Within the last day or two, I made the same suggestion to a third poster in another thread, and his problem was solved too.
Conclusion: Upgrading the router firmware helps sometimes.
If I understand your response, you think that checking for a firmware update isn't even worth a try. Am I missing something?

Post xp installition issues...

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for