Post Your's 3DMark 2001 scores HERE

I would like to verify my 3DMark 2001 SE (v.330). Post your's results with complete system description (drivers versions, ram timings, overclock settings (if any), ect.)
Here is my Baby:
- Athlon 3200 (2210 MHz - NC core, no OC)
- MSI K8N NEO Platinum (1.4 bios)
- 2x 512Mb PC3200 Kingston ValueRam (KVR400X64C2.5/512) at 2.5-3-8-3-1T (stock speeds)
- MSI 6800GT (stock speed)
- WD Caviar 80GB SATA 8Mb cache
- Tagan Tg-480 (480W)
- SB Audigy 2 ZS
- Other standar stuff
My 3D 2k1 score: 21435 (with above system&settings, all stock)
Run at:
- Win XP + SP2
- Dx: 9.0c
- ForceWare: 66.70
NOW YOUR'S RESULTS...

MSI K8N Neo Platinum (1.5b2 beta BIOS)
Athlon 64 3000+ @ 2.4GHz (10 x 240)
Radeon 9800 Pro @ 450/375
2x512MB Crucial PC3200 @ 240MHz @ 3-3-3-8 1T
Catalyst 4.9
Score: 23,077
URL: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8134558

Similar Messages

Post Your's 3DMark 2k1 scores HERE

I would like to verify my 3DMark 2001 SE (v.330). Post your's results with complete system description (drivers versions, ram timings, overclock settings (if any), ect.)
Here is my Baby:
- Athlon 3200 (2210 MHz - NC core, no OC)
- MSI K8N NEO Platinum (1.4 bios)
- 2x 512Mb PC3200 Kingston ValueRam (KVR400X64C2.5/512) at 2.5-3-8-3-1T (stock speeds)
- MSI 6800GT (stock speed)
- WD Caviar 80GB SATA 8Mb cache
- Tagan Tg-480 (480W)
- SB Audigy 2 ZS
- Other standar stuff
My 3D 2k1 score: 21435 (with above system&settings, all stock)
Run at:
- Win XP + SP2
- Dx: 9.0c
- ForceWare: 66.70
NOW YOUR'S RESULTS...

Here is mine using the system in my sig.........
3dmark01 score.....24,552
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8165419
DX9c
66.81 nvidia drivers
XP Pro with SP2

PoSt YoUr 3D mArK ´03 sCoRe HeRe

I´m sorry guys, but before I posted a bechmark test with the video card overclocked (my brother´s fault ), but now everything is ok, ALL the hardware at stock config. Here´s a new COMPLETE test:

Quote
Originally posted by Deathstalker
Devil,
If you do a seach of these forums, you will find plenty of 3DMark2001 and 3DMark2003 Benchark threads in this forum if you just use the Forum's Seach Utility.
Screenies do nothing for me. Anyone can make one of those with Photoshop. Post a link to Futuremark's Compare in ORB.
Take Care,
Richard
LOL, It´s real. Didn´t know the real power of this video card, don´t you?
Then, I will post my score in future mark to demostrate that´s true.

Extremely dissapointing 3DMark 2001 score

I just built my dream system consisting of a 3ghz 800fsb P4, 875P-Neo LSR, and 512x2 Kingston DDR400 CL2.5. I am running a MSI GF4ti 4200 VTD 8X video card. So I get everything up and running, and I bench it with 3DMark 2001 se to start... and the final score was 9450 marks ;( with no antialiasing or anisotropic filtering at a 1024 by 768 resolution/85hz refresh rate. Even when I overclock my video card to ti4400 speeds I still can't break the 10,000 mark. This is the second system I have built and the last was a 1.3 t-bird system. I am only getting about 1200 marks higher than my old 1.3 athlon system. Am I missing something here? From what I have seen on the various forums and published benchmarks I should be getting in the 12-13,000 range easy at stock speeds. What do you guys think could be the inhibiting factors? I don't know much about tweaking, so any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. I also read that for stock un-overclocked systems, the Neo mobo prefers CL 3 ram instead of CL 2.5 ram, could this cause that much of a decrease in performance? Sorry for such helpless newbie questions, but I guess that is what I am . Just to reiterate, I am not looking to overclock at this point, I just want everything to run optimum at stock settings.

Ok problem solved. I was reading the various other threads when I came across this one http://www.msi.com.tw/program/service/forum/index.php?threadid=20708&boardid=10&styleid=1&sid=f95e8c77bfed03ad575ae34495cf2b30 After reading this I remembered that I was missing a driver for a similar component, the SM bus controller, what ever that is. My mobo manual didnt have anything written about it that I could see. I new this was an issue that needed to be taken care of but figured a fresh installation of windows would fix that too. Then after the fresh install and the dissapointing scores again I checked my device manager, and sure enough it was an unknown device that needed a driver. So I checked for a driver in the Win XP cd, and then the Neo-LSR cd, and it kept saying, "No suitable drivers could be found". Then I remembered that it was doing this crap with the onboard LAN driver also. So, I took the cd out closed the intall wizard, and put the mobo cd back in and let the disc detector bring up the interface for the drivers and utilities, and sure enough in the driver section of the cd, there was the INF files I needed. I feel like an idiot X( . I just didn't know what it was. Anyway, long story short I am benching around 12,700 and with the video card conservatively oc'd to 275/550 I am hitting 13,500 pts. Thats why I paid to upgrade! Now I just need a beefier video card. Thanx too all for the suggestions

Post 3DMark 01 scores !

I would like to verify my 3DMark 2001 SE (v.330). Post your's results with complete system description (drivers versions, ram timings, overclock settings (if any), ect.)
Here is my Baby:
- Athlon 3200 (2210 MHz - NC core, no OC)
- MSI K8N NEO Platinum (1.4 bios)
- 2x 512Mb PC3200 Kingston ValueRam (KVR400X64C2.5/512) at 2.5-3-8-3-1T (stock speeds)
- MSI 6800GT (stock speed)
- WD Caviar 80GB SATA 8Mb cache
- Tagan Tg-480 (480W)
- SB Audigy 2 ZS
- Other standar stuff
My 3D 2k1 score: 21435 (with above system&settings, all stock)
Run at:
- Win XP + SP2
- Dx: 9.0c
- ForceWare: 66.70
NOW YOUR'S RESULTS...

Quote
Originally posted by stacyanne
3DMark 2001se 13490
seems grim
Everything is stock. Any idea why so low?
Seen similar over here..
Im getting 8400 in 3dMark03 and 15,800 in 3dMark01.
I have a Neo2, A64 3500, Corsair XMS3200C2PT and 6800GT. All at stock.
Fix is next page..
thanx a million Mullins!!
You were right... i had to unistall the GART driver , then unistall the ForceWare 61.77 then reboot and reinstall the GART first followed by the gfx drivers...
... then hey presto the AGPx8 is operational and on a stock 6800GT/3500 system I got
3dMark01 = 22,500
3dMark03 = 11,850

Post Your HDTV display CONFIGURATION HERE.

In order to help others, can those who have full (or close) resolution of your HDTV post your display configuration here?
Please include your television model, OSX version, and list of an additional software/hardware used to get things working.
Thanks.

Toshiba 37WL58, Mac mini 1.5GHz Intel Core Solo, DisplayConfigX (registered), connected with the DVI to VGA adapter.
Verified DisplayConfigX settings:
Monitor Tab:
Refresh: 49.00 - 105.00
Horizontal Frequency: 12.00 - 85.00
Pixel Frequency: 350.00
Aspect Ratio: 4:3
Default Refresh Rate: 60
Resolution Tab:
Horizontal - Vertical
Active Pixel: 1360 - 768
The others are preset, but should read:
Front Porch: 64 - 1
Sync: 144 - 3
Back Porch: 208 - 23
Total: 1776 - 795
The refresh rate should default to 60.003
Afterwards, choose the Widescreen option on the remote.
(Thanks to Andyb2 over at AVForums.com and Mark Parsons1 at Apple Discussions)
Mac mini 1.5GHz Intel Core Solo Mac OS X (10.4.7)

Oracle Config Tools DBCA DBUA NETCA NETMGR -Post your issues here

Hi
This thread is created to collect user experience with Oracle Config tools
DBCA DBUA NETCA NETMGR
You can post your questions,issues and if you come across any bugs you can post here .
This will be taken into consideration and the fix / solution will be given ASAP .
Looking forward for your responses .
Thanks
Kantha

Hi,
I have a Sun SPARC box . There are 7 instances 2 in 9.2.0.8 and 5 in 10.2.0.1 upgraded earlier than my joining. I want to upgrade one of the 9.2.0.8 databases.
The database to upgarde is up and running and can be connected through listener.
I login as the owner of ora10g and start dbua. It shows me all the 7 databases but when I select the database to upgrade it throws the following info :
[b]The Upgrade Assistant Failed in bringing up the database xxxx. Oracle Home /oracle/9.2.0.8 obtained from /etc/oratab was used to connect to the database. Either the database is not running from Oracle Home /oracle/9.2.0.8 or correct Initialization pfile was not found.
It then asks for pfile. -----------------------------------
The database is up and running.The Oracle home is also correct in Oratab file.
I checked the sqls.log file
It has info like
set heading off
set pagesize 0
set feedback off
set linesize 2048
set sqlprompt 'SQL_ENGINE_END_OF_SQL'
show sqlprompt
set sqlprompt 'SQL>'
set sqlprompt 'SQL>';
set heading off
set pagesize 0
set feedback off
set linesize 2048
set sqlprompt 'SQL_ENGINE_END_OF_SQL'
show sqlprompt
set sqlprompt 'SQL>'
connect /****** as SYSDBA
select count(*) from v$instance;
set heading off
set pagesize 0
set feedback off
set linesize 2048
set sqlprompt 'SQL_ENGINE_END_OF_SQL'
show sqlprompt
set sqlprompt 'SQL>'
Please help on this issue . Y cant the DBUA see that database is up?

Kt600 delta post your gripes here!

Major gripes with this board :-
1.why should i have to spend another £50 - £80 on a top of the range psu
just to run a £55 motherboard ?
The amount of people on this forum who have had to upgrade their psu just
to get this board up and running is unbelievable
2. heat :- this board runs a good 10 - 15 degrees higher than its nforce 2
counterparts ! so you have to go out and buy uprated cooling to
get a stable system
never mind trying to clock it
kt6 chipset :-this is the most unstable board i have ever fitted costing more in the long run to get it all up and running than any other ive built
shall stick to the nf2 in future
feel free to post your moans

1: The heat on the cpu, increased ALOT from my old KT400, very strange. It vas before, 39-40 (Idle) now its 45-46, much more I think, maybe there is something wrong with the sensor, or the KT400 had a 'good n' sweet days' sensor.
Well, that would be everything I think.
I ran my XP2500+ at 3200+ yesterday, and it was very stable, but I had to increase my TwinMOS PC2700 memory to 3v to have them in 400 mode. And even then I had to remove Ultra mode and everything else fast, that made the computer slower, atlest in 3dmark, then default clock on everything So I will just get better mem and then I will go 3200+ everyday, I hope, if there wont be a problem with the heat.
Using a open window, and a Cooler Master Aero 7 LITE at 45% speed, I suppose I can increase the speed if I want to clock but Its very loud then. I think, as I said that there might be some error with the sensor, cause the window was open, and the computer was just under it and totaly open, no plates or sidepanels or something, also it was -3C outside (sweden). The old motherboard (K4v) got much colder.
EDIT: I have a Q-TEC 550W (you say they suck, not mine ) and I still got very good voltage even when Im in so extreme overclock (to me that is extreme )

Post your questions about #BlackBerry10 here!

Hey everyone,
What a week last week! I think I'm finally starting to settle down after all the excitement with our global launch events last week.
If you're getting a BlackBerry 10 device soon, take a look at these tips on the BlackBerry Help Blog to help you set up your email, contacts, calendar and social networks: http://helpblog.blackberry.com/2013/01/blackberry-10-add-email-contacts/
Have other questions about BlackBerry 10? Our community can answer pretty much anything, just post your question below!
Remember, if you have a BlackBerry 10 device and need support, check out the BlackBerry 10 Support boards on the main page of the community.
^Bo
Come follow your BlackBerry Technical Team on twitter! @BlackBerryHelp
Be sure to click Likes for those who have helped you.Click Accept as Solution for posts that have solved your issue(s)!

sanjithb wrote:
Why is the bis being stopped and not unlimited in south africa. Especially on the Z10.
the BIS is not stopped. BIS is still required for OS7 and previous.
the Z10 does not need a specific BIS plan, which is generally considered a very good improvement.
The search box on top-right of this page is your true friend, and the public Knowledge Base too:

Post your photo's here

post your photo's of your ipod with cases on or any other picture you like.

Why don't you?

GF4MX440-T8X(8890) 3D Mark 2001 Score

Purchased GF4-MX440 based card based on Tom's Hardware's VGA performance chart(s).
3D Mark 2001 score for a card based on this chipset should be around 5600. However, I am only getting 3600, which a lot less than I was expecting.
(My other computer has a GF2MX200 based card and the numbers 3D Mark 2001 reports 2300 is consistant with Tom's numbers.)
FIC AT31, AMD AthlonXP 1900+, 1 stick of 256MB DDRAM, XP Home.

Hold on there, you start talking "word problems" with hoses and trains leaving the station and my eyes glaze right over
What I was going on was your statement about "...how could 128 vs 245....Soyo (Via chip?) vs. ECS (SIS chip)....." make a 10-15% difference.....
and your "signiture," which says your GF4MX440 is on the ECS board with a Duron.......
System1: FIC AT31, AMD AlthonXP 1900+, ELSA GF2MX200, 256MB DDR, WinXP
System2: ECS K7S5A, Duron 1.3, MSI GF4MX440-T8X, 196MB SDR, Win98SE
System3: ECS K7S5A, Duron 1.1, CreativeLabs TNT2 Ultra, 128MB SDR, Win98SE
.......I failed to see that you seem to be saying here:
"The fact that I was getting essentually the same 3D Mark 2001 score (3700) on XP1900+/256-2100DDR and Duron1.3/196-133SDR systems........."
........that you did take the card and move it to 2 different machines and run the benchmark.......
.....so, yes, I agree with you, it would seem that the card is the limiting factor....at least between those two motherboard/CPU combos you tested in.
So the next thing to look at, I think, would be the original Tom's test....what were the conditions of that test? For instance, was the score of 5000 while running in "AGP8x" mode?
Your statement..........".....The nature of a video benchmark is to minimize the effect of overall system performance has, and maximize (measure) pure video rendering performance....." is not exactly true.....
.....It only minimizes the performance effects caused by the system.....when all cards are tested in the same system. If you do not have EXACTLY the same system-setup, you will not get the same results.
That's why Tom's (and all the others) specify exactly what the "Test Setup" was, right down to the brand and CAS-value of the RAM.
In your statement....."What is important (or essential) is that the overall system performance be adequate to feed the video card with data so as not to starve the video card of test data...." seems to assume that there is a simple threshold you can cross (in CPU power maybe?) where anything above some Ghz number automatically excuses the overall system configuration from being considered as a possible cause of a performance bottleneck.
But I'm mostly arguing a principle here, that we not too hastily excuse our systems from examination.
But maybe it really is your card that's at fault? What about the "SE" version of the MX440? I saw someone here mention they had unintensionally purchased the "SE" version on a card....which I had not heard of.....so I went and looked into it....
The "SE" version of the MX440 was designed with the same idea as the "m64" version of the TNT2.....instead of the TNT2's full 128-bit memory architecture, the "m64" was designed as an economy model with a 64-bit memory achitecture, which sliced into it's performance very noticably.
nVidia has done the same thing with the "SE" version of their GeForce4 MX440, cutting the MX440's 256-bit memory architecture down to a 128-bit.
The guy I saw here on this forum mentioning he had bought one accidentally, was talking about an MSI card too, ....I don't remember for sure, but I think he said it did NOT state this on the box, but the driver identified the chip on his card to be the "SE" version.
Could that be what's going on?
Stenn

K7n2 delta beeps during 3dmark 2001 se 330 benchmark

hi,
i was just wondering about what happened with my k7n2 delta ilsr. i tried to run the 3dmark 2001 se 330 benchmark. i selected all the tests. everthing works fine until the part where the "nature" test comes. the graphics began to skip a lot and there are short beeps that sound at random points during the test. the beeps only sound during the nature test and the succeding tests...
my psu is a 475 watt psu. all my voltage levels are fine under bios and are within 3% (all of them). my video card is a ti4200 128mb (4x) variety. i already turned fast write off, video bios cache off, 8x off, and the aperture size is 128.
my os is windows xp pro sp1. all my drivers are updated using live update utility including the bios. my graphics card driver is also an updated one...
i already tried doing things under a single channel mode and dual channel mode i still get the same results.
did anyone have any experience like this? please help me... thanks

Quote
Originally posted by Wonkanoby
run prime 95 as well and speedfan see how hot it gets
the temperature that i get from speed fan is 50°C (considering that i live in a tropical country - my room temp is 33°C)
but here comes the problem... i only managed to run prime 95 for around 1 minute then everthing is locked up!!!
i was just wondering. my processor must only have a 1733Mhz clock speed, but wcpuid and memtest shows up as 1.734mhz
does it mean there is something wrong with some hardware???

Low 3DMark 2003 Score

Hi all.
I've had my system now for a few weeks and finally got around to seeing what the 3DMark 2003 score is.... now on Tomshardware, similary systems get scores of around 6000. My latest score was 3006, which seems way too slow.
Here is the 3DMark 2003 Breakdown:
GT1 - 119.5fps
GT2 - 14.4fps
GT3 - 13.8fps
GT4 - 24.6fps
CPU Score - 684
CPU Test 1 - 79.5fps
CPU Test 2 - 11.6fps
My system is as follows:
AMD Athlon 64 3000+ (200Mhz FSB)
MSI Neo K8T800 with latest BIOS (using Via 4.51 drivers)
Hercules Radeon 9800Pro 128Mb (using Catalyst 3.10 Drivers)
DX9.0b
Windows XP Pro (32Bit) SP1
2 x Corsair 512Mb 3200 DDR CAS 2.5N (single channel)
No additional Cards (I used onboard LAN, Soundcard, etc).
I'm thinking that I haven't set something right up in the BIOS, but I can't think for the life of me what it would be. I've used the MSI Update tool to get the latest drivers for everything (as of 13th January 2004).
Any ideas?
Many Thanks
Steven

Thanks - when I get back home tonight (at work at the moment). I'll post my BIOS and CPU-Z settings.
The only problem I had during the installation of Windows was the order of installing the drivers - I would get video card problems if I installed VIA Chipset drivers THEN ATI Catalyst (ie Black screen), but no problems if I installed the ATI Catalyst THEN VIA Chipset.
I've also found I get major problems if I have Fast Writes Installed.
The AGP Aperature is set to 64Mb.
Power Supply is 400 Watt
I'm very impressed with the fast responses in this forum, btw! Thanks

Getting an error prompt "the facebook server has returned an unknown error and is not able to fulfill your request. (2001)"

Hi. I need help regarding facebook for blackberry. I cannot post any status update, i keep on receiving an error prompt "the facebook server has returned an unknown error and is not able to fulfill your request. (2001)". it has been like this for the past 3 days. I already did the hard reboot many times, re-send service book though i do'nt think it's needed, and tried uninstalling and reinstalling the facebook application too but still getting the same error everytime i try to post a status update. I can comment to messages on my wall and other profiles, the news feed is updating in time too, i can also log-in and out to facebook with no problem, as well as other applications on my phone like foursquare, BBm, ubersocial, BB protect, BB app world, etc, are all working perfectly fine. And now I don't know what seems to be the problem.
I've already contacted my network provider and told me that the error i'm getting is beyond their scope.
Is anybody having the same problem as mine?
Can someone in BB support team help me regarding this issue and tell me what should I do?
Thank you in advance.

I got the same issue !! Since I've updated my Facebook app 2 or 3 week ago !
I can not update my status and check-in ! It gives me "the facebook server has returned an unknown error and is not able to fulfill your request. (2001) "
I can upload photo, put comment on people, like people status/picture. The news feed update perfectly !
I also tryied to uninstall reinstall the app, reboot etc etc ! I still can't update my status !!!! I've installed 3.0.0.17 this morning and the issue is still there...
I've remarked one thing... On my facebook under "privacy setting/the Apps, Games and Websites" I used to have a "blackberry app" installed. It's not there anymore and I didn't remove it.
I don't know how to reinstall it...

Best export settings? Post your tips!

I have been using iMovie for a long time. I have messed with settings quite a bit but the files always come out huge. I have seen other people's QT movies with great image quality for small file size. I have no idea how they do it.
My best experience in iMovie is to use the CD-ROM setting for export. This gives it the window size that I want, with a small file size, while maintaining pretty good image quality.
I'm talking about custom settings here. I need something other than the pre-made settings. There are so many custom options, but they're all way over my head. My goal is to use something other than h264, but keep the CD-ROM quality and size.
Does anyone have any good custom settings they recommend for getting a good balance of dimensions, image quality, and file size?
If so, post your tips! Let us know your favorite export settings!
--Timothy

The export settings are determined by the way the file is to be viewed.
"Local" files (those on CD's or fast networks) can be much larger in file size because bandwidth isn't much of an issue. Sent to iDVD and they make great videos that can only play in DVD players or software.
"Web" based files are a new can of worms because each persons opinion of "good" and also "small" file size differ so much.
Best advice anyone can give you is for you to make your own sample export "tests":
Take a minute sample (a part that has high action and motion) and choose the "Expert Settings" to send the file to QuickTime.
Try various video codecs and adjust the data and frame rate to raise or reduce file size.
Try AAC audio (very popular audio format) but set the frequency to "half" of CD quality (22050 Hz). This will be half as large in file size.
If your camera didn't record in stereo (most don't) set the file to mono and you reduce the file size in half again.
Compression is nearly an art form and the options in the expert settings can be a bit confusing.

Post Your's 3DMark 2001 scores HERE

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for