Posted size wrong for 64-bit 9201 Solaris SPARC

The size of the files posted at...
http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/oracle9i/htdocs/sol64soft.html
...appear to be incorrect. Please download these files yourself, verify the correct size, and make any needed corrections to the OTN page. Thanks.

It's all in the Oracle documentation:
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/install.112/e47805/toc.htm
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/install.112/e41962/toc.htm
Also take a look at the cluvfy utility:
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/rac.112/e16794/cvu.htm#CWADD1100

Similar Messages

  • Advantage for Linux64-bit Versus Solaris-x86_64 OS in RAC

    Hi,
    Could someone has any comparison document btw Linux-64 bit (RHEL OR Oracle) and Solaris x86_64 operating system for RAC environment?
    I am looking for advantages, disadvantages, performance issues, installation issues, reliability issues, and oracle road map etc.,
    Really appreciate your help!!!!!
    thanks
    rk

    I'd think that comparison is a bit biased though having used both Solaris (x86, x64 and SPARC) and Linux, I'd give the edge to Solaris SPARC over its other incarnations and Linux in any case.
    The reason for using Solaris x86/x64 (for the company I worked for at the time at least) is, as usual, hardware pricing. The x86 hardware is far cheaper than SPARC hardware, but my management did not trust/like Linux hence we used Solaris x86/x64 for the OS. The team lead was a Solaris guy all his life and had previous issues with Linux so I couldn't blame him, as well as, the shop was already Sun so we already had their support and the official Linux support was spotting at the time.
    I don't like Solaris unless it is SPARC though, the other incarnations for me have issues and the Oracle support is lacking. The Oracle releases are WELL behind any other OS release, most likely because Solx64/86 does not have a large enough user base and hence requests.

  • Serious bug for 8.1.7 solaris Sparc download file

    I have downloaded the 8.1.7 solaris.cpio.gz file from the OTN page. I found a serious bug from the OUI program,that is when
    I run the "runInstaller" command ,It apperrs that ./runInstaller : syntax error in line 1 unexpected "(".
    Did anyone find this ? This is a seious problem for this install program , hope OTN to explain this situation. Thanks a lot!!

    If you go to http://metalink.oracle.com, patches & updates is one of the options in the navigation bar.
    Justin

  • Link to downoad the OBIEE software for Sun Solaris sparc 64 bit

    Guys,
    Help me out to know from where i can get software of OBIIEE(Siebel) for installation on Sun Solaris sparc 64 bit.? Its's urgent
    reards
    Prashant

    Such specific software is not available on OTN, you have to contact an Oracle sales representative.
    Werner

  • Question for using ORACLE with SOLARIS

    Hi Experts,
    I have worked Oracle with Linux in one of my projects 2yrs back and i was just a developer, used to write SQL Query, Creating Table and Objects.
    Now i got a question from TL which is
    Tell me about consequences for using Oracle with Solaris?
    I am not worked ORACLE with SOLARIS, Can some one give me the answer for this question with
    1. Difference between ORACLE with LINUX and ORACLE with SOLARIS.
    2. Advantages and Disadvantages Between ORACLE with LINUX and ORACLE with SOLARIS.
    Thanks,
    MuraliDharan V

    Hi MuraliDharan V,
    It would had been better if you had searched first;
    Here is one
    Advantage for Linux64-bit Versus Solaris-x86_64 OS in RAC
    And beside that your question is incomplete:
    -What Oracle? Database, etc
    -Which Version? 9i, 10g, etc
    Aside from that a simple search on google might have answered your question as well.
    But I think there is some new trend of dumping questions here before searching.
    Ex Senior DBA

  • Support for 8-bit pseudocolor visuals on Solaris 10 u8 Virtualbox guest

    Hello,
    I am running Solaris 10 u8 x86 as a Virtualbox (3.0.8) guest on a WinXP host with a NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500 vcard. I use JDS for the Solaris guest, and only 24-bit truecolor visuals are available for the desktop. I desperately need to run Xnest in 8-bit pseudocolor mode for an application. The video driver supplied with the Vbox Solaris guest additions has limited capability, and I think that until that driver is upgraded, I am out of luck. Does anyone have any different thoughts about that?
    Is there a way to edit xorg.conf to get support for 8-bit pseudocolor overlay graphics? Wouldchanging the video driver in that file from vboxvideo to either VGA or VESA help? Any advice from an X expert would be GREATLY appreciated.
    I've also tried to use svcadm to get the guest to open in 8-bit mode (default depth), but I think that the Vbox video driver (standard and VESA) only support 16- and 32-bit color modes. Is there some other way to get JDS or CDE in the guest to run in 8-bit color?
    Thanks.....

    sparcmaster wrote:
    Regarding expense, I was referring to the dual-headed card you suggested, not Xming.ah. my bad. Though most cards nowadays have dual outputs.
    Here is a Vbox report documenting the whole situation, including Sun's replies regarding DirectColor:
    http://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/4557
    it looks like you guys were talking past each other.
    >
    Note my outputs of xdpyinfo in there: no Pseudocolor visuals in 24-bit mode in the guest (the cause of my problem). My host NVIDIA card has dual DVI outputs, and I have two monitors; are you saying that I set one monitor in Windows to run in 8-bit, and then run Xming on that monitor, and then set up a remote display for my guest, and try and get the guest to display to that remote display? If so, that could be worth a try. If not, maybe I did not fully understand the idea from your first post. I'd rather not have to go out and buy a new dual-headed card unless absolutely necessary.The problem you have is that virtualbox needs a 8 bit display somewhere to send the output to. Send your end display is a windows display in 24 bit mode, it's a lose since windows won't (at least the last time I looked) allow an 8 bit window in a 24 bit desktop. You could try running the main windows display in 8 bit mode and then starting virtual box, but odds of things going in your favor is not great.
    Your new idea of running a vnc server in 8-bit mode within Solaris is very interesting indeed. I am unfamiliar with vnc. I saw this page:
    http://www.softpanorama.org/Xwindows/VNC/vnc_on_solaris.shtml
    It says that VNC comes with Solaris 10 u5, on the companion CD. I assume that u8 has it also.Somewhere along the line, sun began do bundle vnc as a part of solaris proper. It should be in /bin/vncserver.
    I'll look into that. If you know of any other source of info on vnc, please let me know. Thank you VERY MUCH for the suggestion!!!Here's more or less what you should do:
    1) login to your virtual solaris box
    2) Start up a 8 bit vnc server by typing "vncserver -depth 8 :1"
    3) After the setup questions (if I remember, you need to at least set a password), you can connect to the vncserver by
    typing "vncviewer :1" and entring the password.
    You could also get a windows VNC viewer and connect to the solaris vnc server. This may render faster, since you aren't running the vncviewer in a virtual session.
    4) In the vnc viewer display (which may look funny because the default setup is usually a horriffic twm session), start your Xnest.
    If you want cde, edit your .vnc/xstartup to look like:
    #!/bin/sh
    xrdb $HOME/.Xresources
    xsetroot -solid grey
    dtterm -geometry 80x24+10+10 -ls -title "$VNCDESKTOP Desktop" &
    dtwm &
    If you want jds, replace the dttterm/dtwm with gnome-panel.
    -r

  • Where is the 64-bit download for AS oracle_proxy.so for 64-bit Solaris ?

    Hi, Experts,
    This is a cross-posting of
    Where is the 64-bit download for oracle_proxy.so for 64-bit Solaris ?
    (Forum Home » Application Server » Oracle Application Server - General )
    in the download forum.
    Where can I get a 64-bit version of this above file, oracle_proxy.so in downloads ?
    Walter

    Here's a download location:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/DL1577

  • Is /var/ld/64/ld.config installed by Solaris 8 for 64-bit?

    According to the man page of crle command, there is a default configuration file (/var/ld/64/ld.config) for 64-bit objects. But I can not find it.
    I tried to run crle -64 command for processing 64-bit objects, and got failed because of the missing of /var/ld/64/ld.config file.
    I appreciate if anyone can tell me how to solve my problem.

    1. I'm using Solaris 10 10/08
    2. yes, no probles during sol8 container installation
    3.flar archive is used, creation without any errors
    4.here is the S40_setup_preload script:
    # Tell ld.so.1(1) to LD_PRELOAD the s8_preload library.
    # The crle must be done within the running zone due to differences in the
    # format of ld.config between S8 and S10 and beyond.
    # As part of the p2v module interface there are environment variables set for
    # this script (e.g. FILEDIR - path to brand-specific file repository).
    # See the p2v script for a full list of variables.
    S8_PRELOAD=/.SUNWnative/usr/lib/brand/solaris8/s8_preload.so.1
    S864_PRELOAD=/.SUNWnative/usr/lib/brand/solaris8/64/s8_preload.so.1
    # We have to add the s8_preload library to the secure path or commands
    # that run with setuid privileges (e.g. a shell via "su" from a normal user)
    # will not be allowed to access the library.
    SECURE_DEST=/usr/lib/secure/s8_preload.so.1
    SECURE64_DEST=/usr/lib/secure/64/s8_preload.so.1
    tag="pre_p2v"
    if [ -f $S8_PRELOAD ]; then
    if [ ! -h $SECURE_DEST ]; then
    if [ -f /var/ld/ld.config -a ! -f /var/ld/ld.config.$tag ]; then
    cp -p /var/ld/ld.config /var/ld/ld.config.$tag
    fi
    ln -s $S8_PRELOAD $SECURE_DEST || exit 1
    fi
    crle -c /var/ld/ld.config -u -E LD_PRELOAD=$SECURE_DEST || exit 1
    fi
    if [ -f $S864_PRELOAD ]; then
    if [ ! -h $SECURE64_DEST ]; then
    if [ -f /var/ld/64/ld.config -a \
    ! -f /var/ld/64/ld.config.$tag ]; then
    cp -p /var/ld/64/ld.config /var/ld/64/ld.config.$tag
    fi
    ln -s $S864_PRELOAD $SECURE64_DEST || exit 1
    fi
    crle -64 -c /var/ld/64/ld.config -u -E LD_PRELOAD=$SECURE64_DEST ||
    exit 1
    fi
    We have many Solaris 10 systems here but there is no /var/ld/64/ld.config file there only the empty
    /var/ld/64 Dir exists. I don't know what's the reason why the post install script is using the S40_setup_preload.
    Rainer

  • Display Postscript Toolkit (dpstk library) for 64 bit Solaris

    Does anyone know whether the
    DPS Toolkit (dpstk library) is available for 64 bit Solaris operating systems?

    Thanks for getting me to the troublemaker ArielK. 
    I can confirm disabling APSDaemon.exe, aka, new Apple Push for WiFi Sync and renaming (or deleting if you are more risk oriented) APSDaemon.exe and APSDaemon_main.dll in this folder "C:\Program Files (x86)\Common Files\Apple\Apple Application Support" resolved my issue. 
    Alternatively, another slightly more annoying but less techy workaround for those nervous about changing filenames is to start iTunes in Safe Mode every time.  You must do it via Programs > iTunes > hold down Ctrl-Shift then click iTunes (does not work if you do it by clicking a short cut in programs list or taskbar, whatever...).  Maybe this disables WiFi Sync by default, dunno.  Don't care at this point, but it seemed to work.
    I can live without WiFi Sync for now, but its a nice feature I would really like to use in the future.
    Apple please fix!!!
    Running: Windows 7 Home Premium x64, iTunes 10.5.2.11.

  • Sorry for posting a wrong question Loading multiple files!!

    Sorry for posting a wrong question Loading multiple files!!
    As per my understanding 
    Sorry for posting a wrong question Loading multiple files!!
    As per my understanding only a standard Dat file can be compared with one single dat file.Because Eacg dat file will be containing its own values. So multiple files cannot be compared.
    Am assuming dat files containing time(s) and acceleration values(g). G value for each file differs.
    Thanku!!
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Hi Rash.patel,
    I'm still not sure I follow you.  When you say "Dat" file, do you mean the DIAdem 8.x standard file with the *.dat header and usuall a *.r64 binary file or two that it references, or do you mean some other specific data file with the extension *.dat or do you just mean a generic data file?
    DIAdem can certainly load multiple files into the Data Portal at the same time, so you must be referring to either a limitation of the "*.Dat" file you're talking about or correcting yourself that all the data you want to compare turns out to be in one "Dat" file.
    Brad Turpin
    DIAdem Product Support Engineer
    National Instruments

  • Tuxedo 8.0 32-bit on Solaris 8 64-bit ( boot-mode)

    Hi:
    i have questions :
    I have Tuxedo 8.0 32-bit product, i'll need run on solaris 8
    ( 64-bit boot-mode ) .
    Is there Problems wiht that???
    My hardware is :
    Sun Microsystems sun4u
    Sun Enterprise 420R (2 X UltraSPARC-II 450MHz)
    System clock frequency: 113 MHz
    Memory size: 2048 Megabytes
    ========================= CPUs =========================
    Run Ecache CPU CPU
    Brd CPU Module MHz MB Impl. Mask
    0 1 1 450 4.0 US-II 10.0
    0 2 2 450 4.0 US-II 10.0
    mymachine#isainfo -v
    64-bit sparcv9 applications
    32-bit sparc applications
    thanks ...
    Alex ...

    Hi Anthony :
    Do you know something about performace between
    Tuxedo 32-bit and Tuxedo 64-bit ?
    Thanks ...
    Alex ...
    Do you working in Bea or other Enterprise ??
    "Anthony Fryer" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    Hi Alex, we are also using tuxedo 32-bit on Solaris 64-bit operating
    system. There
    is no problem doing this as your solaris version supports both 32 bit
    and 64 bit
    programs. The things to watch out for are when you are building a tuxedo
    application,
    you have to make sure that all the libraries you link with are also 32
    bit libraries,
    including oracle. We ran into build problems when some libraries were
    32 bit
    and others were 64 bit.
    There's good information about 32bit v 64bit on solaris at the following
    web site...
    http://docs.sun.com/?p=/doc/806-6543/6jffrdmee&a=view
    I personally would use 64bit if possible, but it's no big deal to build
    32 bit
    applications because my tuxedo application does not need a 64bit address
    space
    and is not computationally heavy. Most of the CPU takes place in the
    database,
    which in our case is Oracle, and which happens to be 64bit anyway. So
    it's not
    a bad thing to build a 32 bit tuxedo application that runs on a 64 bit
    operating
    system, for most types of tuxedo applications.
    "alex fuentes" <[email protected]> wrote:
    Hi again :
    you link show that :
    Sun Solaris 8 tuxedo v8.0 Native 64-bit version - SPARC
    Sun Solaris 8 SPARC X *(using 2.7 32-bit binaries)
    32-bit on 64-bit OS supported
    Then Tuxedo 8.0 32.bit ruuning on Solaris 8 64-bit. OK
    there is support from Bea . Is that is correct ???
    I'll need used Tuxedo 64-bit ,you could benefit in performance.
    Thanks Thanks ...
    Alex ..
    Scott Orshan <[email protected]> wrote:
    If the platform list shows that a 32-bit build is certified on a 64bit
    OS, then you can run it there.
    If you want an actual 64 bit build, it is because you want the big
    address space, longer longs in FML, and everything else you get from
    64
    bits.
    If you want to have an application span Solaris and Digital UNIX, which
    is always 64 bit, you might want both to be 64 bits so that you do
    not
    lose any data in the conversion.
    On HP, you can't link 32-bit Tuxedo with another product that is 64-bit
    (Oracle for example). You might need a 64 bit Tuxedo in order to work
    with other products.
         Scott Orshan
    alex fuentes wrote:
    HI :
    I have Tuxedo 8.0 32-bit for solaris, my questions is :
    Is there problems whith Tuxedo 8.0 32-bit running on Solaris 8 alsorunning 64-bit
    ( boot-mode )?
    there is a Tuxedo 8.0 64-bit Why ??
    Which different between Tuxedo 8.0 32-bit and 64-bit ??
    Thanks ....
    Alex ..

  • Oracle 9i 32 bit in Solaris 9 64 bits

    can anyone tell me what is the Maximum SGA size i can set for Oracle database 9i 32 bit running in Solaris 9 64 bits?
    Oracle version : Oracle Enterprise Edition 9.2.0.1 32-bits
    OS: Solaris 9 64 bits.
    16GB RAM

    user4738409 wrote:
    can anyone tell me what is the Maximum SGA size i can set for Oracle database 9i 32 bit running in Solaris 9 64 bits?
    Oracle version : Oracle Enterprise Edition 9.2.0.1 32-bits
    OS: Solaris 9 64 bits.
    16GB RAMrefer:http://www.dbmonster.com/Uwe/Forum.aspx/oracle-server/8028/Max-SGA-size-for-32-bit-9-2-0-6-on-Solaris
    this may help you,
    regards,

  • Which path of AddOnInstallAPI_x64.dll for 64 bit of SAP B1 9.0?

    Hi Everybody,
    Can u explain which path of AddOnInstallAPI_x64.dll for 64 bit of SAP B1 9.0 Version?
    Please share the download path for AddOnInstallAPI_x64.dll for 64 bit of SAP B1 9.0 Version.
    When am creating ARD fie for 64 bit of SAP B1 9.0 , By Right Click on the Project Properties-->compile-->Advanced Compile Options-->X64.
    Once created ARD file, then i opened "C:\Users\User1\Desktop\ARDFile\ARDname\ARDname\ARDname\AddOnRegDataGenFile"
    While double click on the "windows Batch file"(AddOnRegDataGen), it automatically generates ARD file and EXE File.
    In ARD file, Edit the ARD file--> Change the Platform "N" to "X". whereas EXE file could not change the 64 bit.
    Hence the error shows in SAP b1 "Addon exception or "Incorrect string format".
    Please fix this issue ASAP.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Bowya S S

    hi have a look below posts..
    While running Addon in server I am getting Error...
    in this post see only last reply only
    how to prepare  ard  for 64  bit os...
    How to make a ARD File
    If it is wrong wait for expert suggestion...

  • File size limit for webdav upload

    Dear Experts,
    we set up what we thought to be a restriction of the file size allowed for upload. We did this in the portal via
    System administration --> system configuration --> Knowledge Management --> Protocols --> WebDav --> Max WebDAV request size: 15728640 bytes.
    We would have expected that to not allow us uploading any files larger than 15 MB. Turns out we were wrong and it does not work. Here is a http-trace of an upload of a 21 MB file.
    Note the content length in the outbound message is 21832627.
    ========= Outbound Message =========
    PUT /irj/go/km/docs/documents/LSO/WBT/Academy_test_area/upload/secondUpload/SCORM%5B1%5D.2004.3ED.DocSuite.zip/SCORM%5B1%5D.2004.3ED.DocSuite.zip HTTP/1.1
    Host: ****hostname****:443
    Connection: TE
    TE: trailers, deflate, gzip, compress
    User-Agent: UCI DAV Explorer/0.91 RPT-HTTPClient/0.3-3E
    Translate: f
    Cookie: j_authscheme=basicauthentication; saplb_*=(J2EE405983900)405983952; JSESSIONID=(J2EE405983900)ID1262004252DB00846306331792142983End
    Cookie2: $Version="1"
    Authorization: Basic NDkwNjIyNzE6TGVybnRlNzg=
    Accept-Encoding: deflate, gzip, x-gzip, compress, x-compress
    Content-type: application/zip
    Content-length: 21832627
    **** Lots of Content ****
    * 21 MB of bits and bytes
    **** / Lots of Content
    ========= Inbound Message =========
    HTTP/1.1 201 Created
    Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:39:07 GMT
    Server: SAP J2EE Engine/7.01
    Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
    Cache-Control: no-cache
    Vary: accept-encoding,accept-language,cookie,translate
    ETag: "1589137901012"
    Last-Modified: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:39:15 GMT
    Content-Length: 0
    Via: 1.1 ****hostname****:443
    Would anyone know any other way of preventing the upload of large files via a webDAV client?
    Thank you very much.
    Regards
    Michael

    Hi Michael,
    This cannot be possible in portal but you can upload the max size file through portal drive or webdev . Through portal drive you can upload 50mb or any format file size you can upload through portal but portal you cannot upload you can get the message of file uploading failure or connectivity issues like these messgae appears at every interval so go through the portal drive or webdev.
    But best option for uploading huge file size is Portal drive. This will helpful for you.
    Regards
    RS

  • Size limit for flar file with Sol 10 WANBOOT

    There seems to be some kind of a size limit for flash archive files used by wanboot. When I try to wanboot jumpstart, I get the following:
    Processing profile
    - Opening Flash archive
    ERROR: HTTP server returned an invalid archive file size: <-1256985017> bytes
    ERROR: Invalid HTTP headers were returned from the server
    ERROR: Flash installation failed
    Solaris installation program exited.
    The flash archive is about 3GB. I'm doing the WANBOOT using the "boot cdrom" work-around, because the V100 I'm jumpstarting doesn't support the newer OBP parameters.
    If create a new smaller flash archive like so:
    mv sol10.flar sol10.flar.old
    dd if=sol10.flar.old of=sol10.flar bs=1024K count=1024
    cutting the flar down to 1GB. Then I do the wanboot. I don't get the error, and the jumpstart proceeds. Of course it would eventually have a problem when the cpio file reached premature end.
    So is there a prescribed limit to flars with WANBOOT. I'm assuming it's 2GB, but if so, why?
    No I haven't tried creating a compressed flar: that's next.
    Thanks,
    Chip Bennett
    Laurus Technologies, Inc.
    Itasca, IL

    nope, 64-bit apache2.2 and still the same error:
    Processing profile
    - Opening Flash archive
    HTTP server returned an invalid archive file size:
    <-2116410290> bytes
    ERROR: Invalid HTTP headers were returned from the
    server
    ERROR: Flash installation failed
    Solaris installation program exited.
    apache log:
    192.168.224.112 - - [06/Jul/2006:20:52:45 +0200]
    "HEAD /flash/archives/pt_sol_10_oem.flar HTTP/1.1"
    200 -
    192.168.224.112 - - [06/Jul/2006:20:52:45 +0200] "GET
    /cgi-bin/bootlog-cgi?%3Ctime%3E+wanboot_client+ident:+
    %5BID+380565+user.panic%5D+HTTP+server+returned+an+inv
    alid+archive+file+size:+%3C-2116410290%3E+bytes
    HTTP/1.1" 200 32
    192.168.224.112 - - [06/Jul/2006:20:52:45 +0200] "GET
    /cgi-bin/bootlog-cgi?%3Ctime%3E+wanboot_client+ident:+
    %5BID+592631+user.panic%5D+Invalid+HTTP+headers+were+r
    eturned+from+the+server HTTP/1.1" 200 32
    192.168.224.112 - - [06/Jul/2006:20:52:45 +0200] "GET
    /cgi-bin/bootlog-cgi?%3Ctime%3E+wanboot_client+ident:+
    %5BID+915281+user.panic%5D+Flash+installation+failed
    HTTP/1.1" 200 32
    Any help would be much appreciated.hi. i spent a long time on this issue...and got it working reliably for more than 10 gb flars.
    there are two issues- 1) apache must be 64 bit capable, and 2) you need the latest wanboot miniroot, for solaris 9 and one for solaris 10. i worked for a different division of a major car company based in stuttgart (take a guess) than i do now, and we eventually received the support we needed from sun, through the early release program. i do not know any details about if, how, or when those miniroots are otherwise available. at some point, i can only assume they will be generally available to all, if not already.
    if someone knows more about this availability issue, i would also be interested in this issue.
    thanks, dls

Maybe you are looking for