Posting block

Hi all,
how can i block a customer to post the billing document to realise to accounting

Hi
Maintain some incomplete data for that customer(dont maintain Account assignment grp for that customer) then when you save the billing document for that customer also it wont be forwarded to FI as accounting error will be coming .
If your want to block then block the billing documents for that customer when you create a sales order then manually maintain billing block and then billing cant be done , later on you can release the billing block of that customer and then do billing for that customer
Regards
Srinath

Similar Messages

Why can not freeze book inventory Storage location and Posting block?

Hello,
I tried to freeze book inventory storage location and posting block at storage location level in SAP.
1) OMBP -> "Freeze book inventory storage' is checked at that storage location.
2) MI01 -> the 'Posting Block' and 'Freeze book inventory' in the Physical Inventory Document is checked.
3) Post the Physical Inventory Document by using MI02.
But, I am still able to post inventory movement at that storage location after executing the above.
(I run MB1C with movement type 501 at that location.
I input the material number which are in the created Physical Inventory document.
The posted manterial document is created after I run MB1C.
The document date and the posting date in MB1C are the same date of Physical Inventoery Document.
I can see this material inventory movement from MB51!! )
My question is: Why SAP is allowed to execute the inventory movement after the 'freeze book inventory storage location' and 'Posting block' are checked at OMBP and MI01 ?
Any idea?
Help me, thank you.
Regards,
Sylvia Chen

Problem solved. Thank you for all help!!

F110 - Error Msg "No payment due to delete flag or posting block"

When I use F110 To auto payment a AP open item, the system show the message "Vendor <Vendor Code> <Company Code>: No payment due to delete flag or posting block" in job log.
The AP open item information :
amount 480.
bline date : 2008/09/29
payment term : immediate payment
due date : 2008/09/29
vendor payment method : E
D : expense 480
C : AP - <Vendor Code> 480
The parameter in F110 :
run date : 2008/11/10
indentification : TEST
Parameter :
posting date 2008/11/10
docs entered up to 2008/11/10
company codes : <Company Code>
pmt meths : E
next p/date : 2008/11/11
vendor codes : <Vendor Code>
I don't understand the mean of "Vendor <Vendor Code> <Company Code>: No payment due to delete flag or posting block", how should I payment this AP open Item by F110.
Best regards,

Hi Eric,
Seems like your vendor has been blocked at company code level for any further posting. Try and check with transaction code FK05 or XK05.
If it's blocked then just unblocked it and then try run your payment run.
Cheers
Samir

FRM-40737 How can I execute a query in a post block ?

Hi,
I have two blocks based on the same table. Then it is not a 'real' master detail case. The first block contains two fields who are the values in the where clause of the second block. In which trigger or where do I place the EXECUTE-QUERY ? I can't place it in the post-block because post-block don't accept EXECUTE-QUERY and I dont want to use a timer because it bring me some troubles.
Than'k you !

I have two blocks based on the same table. Then it is not a 'real' master detail case. You can easily create a master-detail here, if your data model allows it. A table can have a foreign key relation to itself. E.g. emp.manager_id if the fk to emp.empno.

Posting block Question in How to handle inventory management scenarios

Hi all - I have a question in document
"How to...Handle Inventory Management Scenarios in BW"
can anyone please tell me what a posting block is in this document...
also I did not understood what a Validity table is?
thanks,
Sabrina.

Hi Sabrina!
A 'posting block' period is something that now you are facing in inventory management, but you have to consider it in ALL logistic cockpit flows (what you can see in LBWE).
This requirement can be easily explained in this way: as you know, to fill a setup table you have to activate the extract structure of the datasource for which you want to run the setup job (otherwise the system says that no active extract structure exists, do you remember ?); but, by doing so with the posting operations open (in other words, users can create new document or change the existing ones), you run the risk that these records are automatically included in the extraction queue (or in SM13 if you are using unserialized method) AND also collected in setup table ! And you will have the same records with the initial load (from setup table) and then the same from delta load (from the queue): a nice data duplication.
To avoid this situation, a "posting block" (or a "free-posting period" or a "downtime") is requested. No one can post new document during your setup job...
Hope now is clearer...
Bye,
Roberto

Minimize posting block time

Hi Gurus,
we are using inventory management in BW 3.5 , the data is loaded from SAP R/3 . for every maintenance operation in data sources (2LIS_03_Bf, ...) or upgrade, we have to do initialization in the R/3 side that means blocking all stock movements during the initialization (~ 8 Hours!) this situation is very inconvenient for the users.
have you any solution to minimize the posting block time?
thank you.

hi,
Thank you Dhanya, so if i get it right it's possible to have zero down time during setup and initialization with this method :
1. delete data in infoprividers in BW
2. Delete setup tables and delta queues in R/3.
2. Run init from BW with no data transfer (supposition: this will setup delta queues).
3. Run setup tables filling in R/3 (supposition: all documents posted while this operation is going on will be stored in delta queues)
4. Run full repair load in BW
5. Run delta load in BW.
is this right?
how about compression with and without marker update mentioned here? [https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f83be790-0201-0010-4fb0-98bd7c01e328|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f83be790-0201-0010-4fb0-98bd7c01e328]
we are using first scenario : Inventory management with non-cumulative key figures.
Thank you.

Posting block check in MI31 transaction

Hi,
I have done following steps -
1. Create inv document using MI31 with posting block check box selected. Step OK.
2. Doing 311 using MB1B - System prevents me from doing this movement. Step OK
3. Doing MI04 Step OK
4. Again doing 311 using MB1B - System prevents me from doing this movement, but with only one material.
If I am trying with other material, after MI04, I am able to do movement type 311 move using MB1B.
What is that it prevent me from doing 311 activity will that material after MI04?
Any input is appreciated,
Regards,
Dipak

not fully correct. the posting block is erased whenever you enter a count, it does not matter if your count matches with the book quantity or not.
The purpose of the posting block is to prevent entering movements in SAP while a phyiscal inventory is active. This is only one side of the medal. The other side is your organisation of a physical inventory. Here you have to take the same measures, you need to prevent people from moving materials until you have finished your count.
Once you enter the count, then SAP is just certain that the count has finished and the block is no longer needed.
If you counted correctly, then you will not move more than you counted, hence you will not have any issue if you post the difference some days later.

Posting block and Marked for Deletion

Hi All,
My clients wants to know the vendors who are either marked for deletion or blocked for posting when was the date for the block or marking it for deletion and the person responsible.
Though i can see that one by one through Vendor master but i need to give this in report format.
Even with Fk04 i am not able to make out.Can you please help me out.Bit urgent

Hi,
You can check old value and new value by using table CDPOS.
If you want to know the time and person responsible by using table CDHDR
In table, put table name LFA1/LFB1 and required field like for field SPERR (LFB1) is for posting block for selected company code and field SPERR (LFA1) is for posting block for all company codes.
If you want to know it for specific vendor, then given vendor number in Object value or leave it blank for all items.
Hope it will be useful.
Regards,
Vinod

How to set posting block in BIlling Doc type configuration

Hi All,
Can anybody tell me, How to set posting block in BIlling Doc type configuration.I need to do this to seperate billing creation from from FI/CO posting in my company.
We right now run have the batch jobs which run VF06 & VFX3.
Appreciate any input or suggestions.
Regards,
Vinay

Hi
If you want to check the Manual posting blocks you can configure them through FI/CO. Once you have configured the blocks with reasons it will automatically block for the payments.
goto SPRO-> Financial accounting->Account receivable & Payable ->Business Transactions-> Out going Payments-> Manual outgoing Payments-> Check payment block reason.
Cheers

Posting Block issue

Hi Gurus..
In Billing Document Type thers a check box for in General Control for Posting Block.
My Question is do we have to put the tick for Credit memo request.Coz in my organization some of the billing type which is std invoice has been block for posting which i need to remove.But what i can see is that thers a tick box for Credit memo billing type.
Is it standard process for credit memo. or shud i remove the tick ?
Thanks in Advance.
Shri

Dear Shri,
NO you should not remove the Posting Block Tick in Credit Memo.
Yes is a SAP Standard recomendation & the policy accepted by most of the companies to put Posting Blocks in Credit Memos.
Because Credit Memo is a direct reversal of Customer Debit is reduces Company's Account Receivables.
Thus it is always advisable that a Credit Memo should have a posting block & a seniour person (other than the person who creates the Credit Memo) should remove the block & post the Credit Memo to accounts after checking the same...
Hope this helps...
Thanks,
Jignesh Mehta

Agency Business : Creating a VBD with Posting block manual condition

Dear developers,
I have a question regarding Agency Business.
First of all I would like to introduce my problem :
1. Posting block option set for my payment type;
2. Created a VBD with a manual condition which creates a balance when releasing to accounting;
My question is :
Should the system behave in the same way and releases the document to accounting on both scenarios below?
Scenario 1
1. Run transaction WZR2
2. Inform the document number (without opening the document)
3. On the initial screen of transaction WZR2(without opening the document) click on button "Release to Accounting"
Scenario 2
1. Run transaction WZR2
2. Inform the document number
3. Press Enter to open the document
3. After have opened the document click on button save.

Hi
I assume you have info record maintained for the vendor material plant combination form where PB00 price is picked.
I do not think you can add the manual condition during ME_PO_CREATE_1.
I assume that the manual condition will be given on the custom program selection screen which in turn call the PO create BAPI.
With this assumption, I would suggest to Post the PO create BAPI & then call the PO change BAPI to add the manual condition in the same custom program.
Hope this helps.
Thanx
PP

Mass Vendor Deletion and posting Block unblock.

Hi All,
I have done the mass deletion flag and posting block of vendors ate P.org and Co.code level through t.code-XK99.
I want to retrive my changes and vendor shuold active again instead of populating a warning message.I am aware of T.Code-XK05 but i tried it through T.Code-XK99 however i am not able to unblock those vendors.
could anyone let me know were i am ,missing.
Regards,
Gaurav Surana

Transaction MASS > LFA1 is same as in XK99
XK99 should work in your case. Please check that you are selecting the correct table and fields to be changed in this XK99 transaction.
Are you also getting any error message during the saving in XK99?
Regards,
SDNer

Future Posting Block for Inventory document

Hi Friends,
My client want to create a PID (Physical Inventory doc) to day with planned count date next week and posting block checked.
But, they does not want to block it to post till the begining of planned count date. Practically, they want the posting block to be effective on Planned count date.
Can it be??
Appreciate your help in advance.
Regards,
Dev.

Hi,
Please read SAP online help:
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/4d/2b8d3943ad11d189410000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
Here you can see that transaction MI32 can be used to set posting block in mass.
When count date comes:
- user can set the block via MI32 in mass
- in advance you can schedule ba background job for MI32 in order to set the posting block
I wouldn't go to development...if it is not necessary...
(my opinion)
Regards,
Csaba
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Feb 26, 2010 10:43 PM

Default check on the 'Posting block' check box in the Physical Inventory

I am looking for a default check on the 'Posting block' check box in the Physical Inventory document for T-code MI01 or MI31. Can anyone help in this?

Thanks for your reply. Can you send me the detail process how to do it through Transaction Variant.
Regards,
Tt

Posting block Vs Freezing Book Inventory

Hi all.,
During PI count, there is an option to Block the Material. In this scenario, there can be no movement of material either GI or GR, right?
In freeze book inventory as well, "we can freeze the book inventory balance in the
physical inventory document. This is to prevent the book inventory balance, which is relevant for physical inventory, from being changed by any movements". So the terms of Movement should mean either GR or GI, right?
Now, how similar or different are these two conditions during PI?
Appreciate all the help
Thanks

Hi Mahesh,
With regard to posting block...you have understood correctly. The indicator is set for the affected stocks in each case (storage location stock, batch stock, or special stock) for all associated stock types and is not cancelled until the count results are posted. The indicator remains in the physical document header even if the stock is unblocked through the posting of inventory differences. It then only indicates that a posting block was set for the documents. The blocking indicator can be set in one of two ways:
(a) Directly upon entry of the physical inventory document (if the count is to take place immediately)
(b) Shortly before the count (if the count is to take place later)
With regard to Freeze the book inventory, at the time of PI, when you enable this indicator, system take snap shot of Quantity and Value in internal tables. That means, you can't hold or stop your business operation during this process. This indicator has the effect that the current book inventory balance is recorded in the physical inventory document. The system compares the counted stock with the frozen book inventory balance to determine any inventory differences.
Bye,
Muralidhara

Posting Block in applications

Hi guys,
how to create posting blocks other than lockin users out and selection restrictions in inventory, sd, and other applications.
Blocking Orders say in oli7bw doesnt really post new
documents right, whats the relevancy of it.
Your help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks.

if your delta is initialized and a doc is changed then yes you will capture the change
the point is that you could end with double extraction: once with your init and once because y doc has been changed...
so the procedure should be:
1. init your delta
2. right after start your SETUP with blocking documents
<at this stage, user will only be able to create NEW documents which you will capture with your delta>
3. at the end of the SETUP the docs will be released and any change will be captured as well
This ensure procedure enable you to fill the init table and avoid duplicate information extracted to BW.
hope this clears your doubts
Olivier.
Message was edited by:
Olivier Cora

Posting block

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for