Posting error..mid month cost cenre chenged

Hi All
One employee transferred (18.04.2011) mid month. So i have changed position (cost centre also), then employee have one cost centre in 01.04.2011 to 17.04.2011 and from 18.04.2011 onwards in another cost centre. While doing posting (PC00_M99_CIPE) system is showing below error.
u201CBalancing field "Profit Centre" in line item 009 not filledu201D Message no. GLT2201u201D
Here, line item 009 is /559(bank transfer wage type)
Thanks and Regards
Madhu Bijjala

Hello Madhu,
Please check with the Finance team.  Some of the settins related to cost center and profit center needs to be changed.
Check the below thread for your reference.
Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 001 not filled
GLT2201 - Balancing field profit center in line item 001 not filled
Hope this helps.
Best Regards.
Karan.

Similar Messages

  • Costing Sheet Overhead Rate Change Mid Month

    Does SAP Support a mid month overhead rate change in a costing sheet?  I have an overhead rate change effective 5/12/2007, but my PM Order is not recognizing the change unless the Basic Start Date of the order is 6/1/2007.

    hi
    it will not support mid month overhead. it should be either period basis or yearly basis.
    regards,
    siva

  • IT0007 Change Mid Month/Payroll error

    Geeks,
    I have a situation wherein I need to change the WSR of a employee mid- month - which I did thru PA30 by creating a new IT7 with start date as 14 july 2014 (below is the overview screen shot of IT7 after change)
    With Basic as 5000, I ran his payroll from 01-july 2014 to 31-july 2014, but when I look the form, its displaying Basic as 3518 (I haven assigned any unpaid or LOP). Can anybody help me out in knowing wht mistake m I doing?
    regards
    Tahir

    In the IT to or from INP1, I can see that the Partial Period Parameters WageTypes /801, /802, /803 and /806 all total 100% (or 10.000,000), while /804 totals 70.37% and /805 totals 174.19%.
    In the IT from XVAL, it can be seen that all valued WageTypes were done so by using /804.
    I am not familiar with Payroll for India, but here are a two questions :
    1 - If your Payroll Schema includes function PRINT with Par1 = NP and Par2 = PART, check your Partial Period Parameters and try to identify why /804 totals 70.37%. 
    2 - What kind of Absences or Attendances has the employee to justify that ratio?
    You have mentioned that "Basic Salary" WT 1000 has Pr.Cl.10 with value 04, meaning that Partial Period Parameter /804 will be used for the factoring of that WT, and that is what happens. 
    The solution to your problem lies in understanding why the factors /802 and /804 are identical for the first portion of the payroll period but are different for the second part of the period.
    3   /802   01     40 740,74
    3   /802   02     59 259,26
    3   /804   01     40 740,74
    3   /804   02     29 626,63

  • Pension and mid-month hiring

    Dear Experts,
    A person was hired in mid-month, the 15th.
    Payable earnings is 4480
    The schema is referencing the correct wage type /103
    in payroll  the amount  for the pension of 2480.85 x 6.9% = 171.18. But it should be 309.12
    a pcr was created for special cumulations into/103 that reads as follows;
    - 3
        - /103 PF APPL. EARNINGS
              WPALL FRST
              ADDWT *
    There's no other wage type that has that amount. anks
    How do we get teh calculation for the 309.12 to result?
    Many thanks,
    M

    I must forewarn you that I am not familiar with IT0150.
    In your initial post, you had mentioned a pcr as
    - 3      - /103 PF APPL. EARNINGS
              WPALL FRST
              ADDWT *
    This implies that if WT /103 exists in more than one "split", then only it's values (RTE/NUM/AMT) for the first split will be kept in the Input Table, that is if that are all options for the pcr.
    Regarding pcr ZVA1, you should first look into the Input Table that is read by the pcr to check the values of /103 and of /809 (Constant GENAU should have a value of 100,000.00).  As mentioned by Frances, this is a Custom pcr that will prorate the amount paid.  It was created to respond to a requirement, but if I understand you correctly, you would like the payment not to be prorated when the employee is hired in the current month.
    Do you have a WT or a temporary variable that indicates that the employee has been hired in the current month?

  • Information about financial closing in mid-month

    Hello,
    I have a question regarding  financial close. Our fiscal year is a calendar year with one special period configured in the system. For some rare circumstances my company has to do a mid month close in June. So we need to close June by June 15th and from June 15th u2013June 30th, we have  to see Julyu2019s period ( 7th) when we post a document .  Is that possible to do in SAP. Can we change any config in the midst of the year or in a live system.  Is so how.
    Thanks in advance
    Tanya

    Dear Prasobh,
    Thanks for your comments...
    The transactions are perfects! But is there any place where we can check the value summarized and mainly that the quantity of the movement type 262 be excluded of the quantity total like the column "Quantity withdrawn" in process order.
    In the transactions COID, COOISPI and COIO the system shows the individual values by the movement type.
    Eg. In a process order any there are 02 movements types 261 = 110 pc (total=220 pc) and 01 movement type = 262 of the 110 pc. In the COID, COOISPI and COIO the system shows me 330 pc but I would like see 110 pc.
    Best Regards!
    Valdevair

  • New FSV for Mid month Dep Key

    Hi guys,
    I am trying to define new fiscal year version with 24 periods which is required for mid month convention cuz we are using a FSV which starts Dec-Nov and is year dependent.I need little help on how to divided these periods into 24, cuz each time i am getting some errors ,like there are gaps in FSV.The details of our accounting periods are as uder.
    FOR 2009 FSV (DEC-NOV)
    MONTH          DAY              PERIOD         SHIFT
    1     31     2     0
    2     28     3     0
    3     28     4     0
    5     2     5     0
    5     30     6     0
    6     27     7     0
    8     1     8     0
    8     29     9     0
    9     26     10     0
    10     31     11     0
    11     30     12     0
    12     26     1     1 (1 SHOWS 1,2 PERIOD IN 2010)
    12     31     2     +1
    FOR 2010
    MONTH          DAY              PERIOD         SHIFT
    1     30     2     0
    2     27     3     0
    3     27     4     0
    4     29     5     0
    5     29     6     0
    6     26     7     0
    7     31     8     0
    8     28     9     0
    9     25     10     0
    10     30     11     0
    11     30     12     0
    12     25     1     1(1 SHOWS YEAR 2011)
    12     31     2     +1
    So how do I divide these into 24 periods for mid  month calculation.if ANyone could help especially PAULkr or Nathen, I be grateful.
    Thanks
    Shaun

    If your fiscal year starting in Dec, I think you can do the following settings for your 24 period fiscal year
    Month  Day   Period  
    1           15       3
    1            31      4
    2            15       5
    2            28        6
    Continue like this until
    11         15         23
    11         30         24
    12         15         1          +1
    12         31         2          +1
    Paul

  • Fixed Assets Mid-Month rule using non-calendar fiscal months.

    Our fiscal year variant is year dependent with twelve posting periods.  For example, period 11 for fiscal year 2007 is defined as 29-Oct-07 through 25-Nov-07 and period 12 is defined as 26-Nov-07 through 31-Dec-07.
    Fixed Asset depreciation keys MSTL and NA1 use period control 03 (Pro rata at mid-period).  Period control 03 is currently not configured in our SAP development system.  The IMG help text for “Use of Half Months in the Company Code” states that “You cannot use half periods with non-calendar fiscal months”.  
    How do USA companies configure mid-month depreciation keys (like MSTL and NA1) and mid-quarter depreciation keys when they use non-calendar fiscal months?

    Mike,
    Would be helfpul if you can describe how you resolved the above issue
    Thanks.

  • Changing Plan Mid-month "pro-rated" unclear and deceptive practice. C.S. offers no help

    I recently found myself having to up my plan minutes for a family emergency. I went online and checked my usage I was at 394 minutes out of a 450 minute plan, so I elected to switch to the 900 plan minute for the month, ancipating I would go over in the next week. I was given options to back date it  or start on that day, as I had clearly not gone over my alloted minutes, I chose to start it as of that day.
    My Bill came and I received 69 dollars in minute overages. How was this explained, that by prorating the bill, they divide the cylcel in half, not only by "dollars" which seemed to be the explantion I received online, but by minutes. SO my minute alotment of 450 was reduced to 240 for those two weeks I oriignally had 450 minutes in. They billed as if that was my allowance therefore saying I now went over my plan by 154 minute which I was billed to the tune of 69.00 dollars, plus the addition of the monthly increase in plan.
    My question to any logical rational intelligent person would be, why would someone choose to up there minute plan, before they went over, just to then be charged for minutes they would not have been had they not upped there plan to the next level. This defies common sense and any explanation would as well.
    Customer service sadly would not even hear or understand this, only to say this is a valid "cost" and I should have read the "disclosure" statement or called if I had questions and not use online services. I asked both the operator and a supervisor for the terms of the disclosure agrement and neither could tell me what it said. However in reading  billing question answers they respond "For example, if you changed rate plans during the middle of your billing cycle, your statement should contain a charge for the old rate plan (according to the number of days in your cycle that you were on the old rate plan) and the new rate plan. " yes that makes sense but no where does it say your minutes may be reduced up until this point and you may occur additional charges not already used. by ironically "increasing your minute plan".
    I am waiting for a manager to return my call,  As a long time customer of verizon whom have promoted them and the new iphone all over facebook and such to my friends I am very discouraged by this practice, and the lack of resolve.

    Mike I appreciate that at least you are familiar with what the disclosure statement says, despite othert reps not being able to recite it. However the term "may" be in inself is Misleading, if "airtime" is  prorated the statement should read "YOUR airtime MINUTES will be prorated and reduced to this point, possibly resulting in overages and additional charges" The wording is intentionally misleading. If it weren't MIke, why would anyone KNowingly select an option that would then cause them to  owe an additional 69.00 dollars they didnt owe at the time, when UPPING their PLAN?
    The fact that Customer Service Can't see that as a very real possiblity and just is dissmisive saying You should have read the disclosure statement., and it is a valid charge tells, me they run into this frequently and they have a script to read from to cover themselves, leaving the HUman Element out of the equation. It is sad enough I had to Up my plan only temporarily while dealing with a tragic family situation, to add insult to injury. To me the term "may" be prorated and "may" result in additional overages meant, that if I had gone over my minutes prior to the change I would be charged, because MIKE that is COMMON SENSE. and a REASONABLE person May think that. Cutomer Service Reps could at least acknowledge that as a very real Understanding of how that line could be interupted, and that a reasonable person would not otherwise increase their plan only to be charge for something they would not have otherwise been charged.
    I am almost positive in the Future this wording will be Changed after the continued Myriad of complaints. From what I already understand the new "changing minutes and not plan" option already has changed it. SO why not make things right for long time loyal customers now. I actually want to reduce my plan back down now as it was a temporary emergency however I DONT dare do it mid month again, SO I will wait another 2 weeks and pay even more.
    This is NOT ME and my misunderstanding, just googling the topic comes up with tons and tons of complaints, articles written on the topic and so fourth. I have been waiting days for someone as promised to call me back as well and that hasnt happened. I have talked to so many friends about this many verizon customers and all say this can't be right, because it DOESNT MAKE SENSE, despite it being "valid" as you say.

  • Mid Month Close - Financial Close

    Hello
    I would like to ask the experts on the activities we need to perform for a mid-month close during a fiscal year (A month which is not a normal fiscal month end) . For example, if a company is being sold in the middle of the month and they need to generate the financial statements as of that date (sales, expenses, margins etc) what all do we need to do. What are the limitations ?
    Please share your experiences. List of activities and steps that need to be done would be really appreciated.
    Thank you for your time.

    Hello Rahul,
    I thought of sharing some inputs on this scenario, from an old friend.
    Some aspects/limitations which could be highlighted:
    1. Splitting the period into two periods.
    2. Depreciation Posting would be calculated for the entire month. 15 days depreciation will have to be adjusted manually.
    3. How the Business manages the balance carry forward for the respective month, is another challenge.
    4. Google for sap msg fgv618
    Hope this is helpful.
    Regards,
    Avinash

  • Non operating expenses can only be posted to non operating cost centers

    Hi ,
    Where do we defien the relation/validation " Non operating expenses can only be posted to non operating cost centers" in SPRO ? Is it a part of configuration or validation ?
    Regards,
    Pradeepa

    Hi,
    In my knowledge, it is not configuration issue. Write validation for this. At the time of posting of Non operating expenses, you have to select non operating cost centers. If  you select other cost center system will prompt error message according to your validation.
    Thanks
    Chandra

  • Pension issue Mid Month Leaving

    Dear All,
    As per rule sustem should deduct mid month joining/leaving/absences or transfer scenarios, the Pension/PF Basis will be correspondingly prorated. But our system is not doing this. In RT table i have found 3FC Pension Basis for Er c 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00.
    Employee leaving date is 14.04.2010. system is picking pension amout as 541. Last year it was coming right.
    Please suggest.
    Ashwani

    Dear Jayanti,
    We required prorata basis pension in case of left employees and system is not doing this. This is the issue. As per our PF experts Pension amount should come on prorata basis for left employees in case they left mid of month.System is doing prorata basis last year but from this year it is deducting 541. I am giving two RT cases of different years.
    RT table for year 2010. DOL 26.04.2010
    /111 EPF Basis              01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00 
    /139 VPF Basis              01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00 
    /3F1 Ee PF contribution     01/2010                    0.00           1,050.00 
    /3F3 Er PF contribution     01/2010                    0.00             509.00 
    /3F5 Ee Mon PF contribution 01/2010                    0.00           1,050.00 
    /3F6 Ee Ann PF contribution 01/2010                    0.00          12,600.00 
    /3F9 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,00 01/2010                    0.00              96.25 
    /3FA PF basis for Ee contri 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00 
    /3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00 
    /3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00 
    /3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00 
    /3F4 Er Pension contributio 01/2010                    0.00             541.00
    /3FC Pension Basis for Er c 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00
    /3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
    /3FC Pension Basis for Er c 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00
    /3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
    /3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00
    /3R3 Metro HRA Basis Amount 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
    1BAS Basic Salary           01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
    RT table for year 2009. DOL 27.10.2009
                                                                                    /111 EPF Basis              07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13
    /139 VPF Basis              07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13
    /3F1 Ee PF contribution     07/2009                    0.00           1,082.00
    /3F3 Er PF contribution     07/2009                    0.00             628.00
    /3F5 Ee Mon PF contribution 07/2009                    0.00           1,082.00
    /3F6 Ee Ann PF contribution 07/2009                    0.00           8,822.00
    /3F9 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,00 07/2009                    0.00              99.18
    /3FA PF basis for Ee contri 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
    /3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
    /3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
    /3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           5,452.00
    /3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00 
    /3FC Pension Basis for Er c 07/2009                    0.00           5,452.00 
    /3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00 
    /3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           5,452.00 
    /3R4 Non-metro HRA Basis Am 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13 
    1BAS Basic Salary           07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13 
    Now please suggest what to do. where is the problem  ? If have also checked EXIT_HINCALC0_002 but nothing written in it.
    With Regards
    Ashwani

  • Asset Accounting - Mid month Convention

    Hi,
    I have a problem in Asset Accouting for configuring a mid-month convention (and mid-quarter), settings. I activated the use of half-month in my company code (value 15), and defined Calender assignment for my Fiscal year variant, for Period control 03. The depreciation start date is correctly calculated for the tax depreciation area (period control 03). But, for my book and group depreciation area (period control 01 - 1st of acquisition month), the system also calculating 15/mm.
    For Book Depreciation area I need to calculate depreciation for the entire period in which Asset is acquired (period Control 01) Currently If I acuire the asset before 15th of month its calculating depreciation for entire month and If I acquire the asset after 15th of month its calculating only for half month.
    Is there a way to have mid-month calculation only applying to specific depreciation area ? Did i miss something in the customizing or do I have to change the period control 01 to force the start date at the first of the current month ?
    If you require any futher info to provide input on this issue, Please let me know.
    Thanks in advance to everyone who could help me.

    As long as the depreciation keys are different between the depreciation areas you should be able to have one calculating at mid-month and the other at full month, respectively. 
    Just a thought: Go into transaction "OAVH" and make sure that the periods are assigned correctly for your Period Control "1".  It should have one line item with a "0" in the month and day field and the period field should be 'blank'.
    If the Period Control is correct, you should try creating a custom Period Control that defines each period as the last day of the month.
    Hope this helps,
    Chad

  • PF- Mid month employees

    Hi all,
    I am facing some issue in the provident fund for the Mid month joined employees. As per the client requirement, SAP is not calculating. I need your help in this.
    For all the employees we are maintaining the IT 0587 has whichever is less.
    I go through some of the threads, still now I am not able to put condition in the PCR.
    Ex: Employee hired in the month of april 15.04.2014 his Basic salary is 10,000 rps.  When I run the payroll basic salary is prorated with the amount 5333.33 for 16 days in the april month. But, PF should calculate based on the amount 5333.33 but in the output it is showing as 416.
    Actually, PF should deduct 640 rps but it is showing 416 rps. 224 rps different amount is coming. How to resolve this one.
    Regards,
    Vijay Kumar

    Hi,
    When employee joins in the middle of the month The provident fund will prorate on Rs 6500 according to PF Act and standard rule that was defined in SAP as per act. You cannot change the rule that has defined in standard.  The user exist cannot be the right solution for this. The user exist which are there it will not override the standard functionality. The best way is to go according to Act that was defined in SAP.
    Incase if you want Rs 780 to be deducted for the first month for mid month joinee employees This can be done by manually inputting the data in additional payment wage type There are several ways to adjust the amount. You can either create a PF Adjustment wage type in additional payment for mid joinee employees to adjust the amount.

  • Income tax issue for mid month joinees

    Issue 2:
    For New (mid month) joinee at the first month gross salary is calculated based on the earned salary amount *12 months (or no. of remaining months for financial yr end), but in my client income tax deducted based on the actual salary (not earned salary) from the first month onwards.
    For example :
    Employee X,
    Joined date 15.08.2011,
    Actual salary = 1,00,000 INR.  Earned salary for 15 days = 50,000 INR.
    While Start Payroll for the period 5th (August) 2011. The WT /416 Gross salary = 4,00,000 (50000*8). Based on this gross salary income tax calculated, But I want to calculated the gross at first month (august 2011) based on follows,
    Gross salary : August month earned salary = 50,000 + Actual salary per month =1,00,000*7 =7,00,000.
    Gross salary = 7,50,000 INR.
    Please give me some solution
    Thanks and regards
    Mohan .V

    Hi Param Dayal,
    New issues rise Now....
    For New (mid month) joinee at the first month Exemption U/S 10 is calculated based on the Conveyance Allowance amount *12 months (or no. of remaining months for financial yr end), but in my client income tax Exemption U/S 10 based on the actual salary (not earned salary) from the first month onwards.
    For example :
    Employee X,
    Joined date 15.08.2011,
    Conveyance Allowance = 800 INR. Earned Conveyance Allowance for 15 days = 400 INR.
    While Start Payroll for the period 5th (August) 2011. The WT /130 Exemption U/S 10 = 3,200 (400*8). Based on this Conveyance Allowance The Exemption U/S 10 calculated, But I want to calculated the Exemption U/S 10 at first month (august 2011) based on follows,
    August month earned Conveyance Allowance = 400 INR + Actual Conveyance Allowance per month =800*7 =5,600.
    Exemption U/S 10 = 6,000 INR.
    Please give me some solution
    Thanks and regards
    Mohan .V
    Edited by: mohantamilan on Sep 26, 2011 2:52 PM

  • Mid-Month Calculations

    I am bringing a fixed asset system online in SAP and during the legacy conversion it was realized that the test system is not calculating the depreciation using a mid month convention.  That being said looking at the configuration the company code was setup in 2005 and is in production and is productive (since 2005).  So it appears that this setting is global and SAP will not allow me to change these settings to allow mid month calculations.  Is this correct? anyone ran across the same issue.

    Hi
    please read the note 2993 and 39416!
    Best Regards,
    Blaz

Maybe you are looking for