Posting In COPA PSG

The scenario is that I have a promotion bill say for 5000. This is related to one vendor.The promotion is for 3 materials. 5 customers consume this materal.When posting to vendor Account through FB60, Profitability Segment (PSG) will be selected , the problem is that in PSG there is no lines for group of material or group of customers, there is for cusomer (without range) or product. How to distribute 5000 for 3 materials and 5 customers?

Hi Ahmed
Top down is the ideal option for this.. But, it is not user friendly....
Initially, you will have to post it to a higher level characteristic,say, Customer Group.. Then you will have to distribute it down the level....
thats the reason I did not recommend it... May be you can try KE28 once and see if it is easier for you
Regards
Ajay M

Similar Messages

Gr and ir post to copa

hi,
1) for item base on standard price, price difference during GR or IR will post to copa. does it mean if GR price difference is 10 and IR the price difference -2, then the total difference in copa is 8?
2) for item base on map, how does the difference flow to copa? the changes in stock account how to flow to copa?
3) for item base on standard price, after miro posting, why no profitability analysis in accounting doc.
4) for item base on map, after miro posting, i do not see profitability analysis in accounting document. why?
thanks

Hi,
for clarification of my understanding.
1) only price difference flow to copa which is due to deviation in standard price, correct?
2) changes in stock account for map product due to price variance, not flow to copa, correct?
3) if no variance in either price difference for standard price or changes in stock account for map, then no document posted to copa, correct?
thanks

Do not want to Post to COPA

Can someone please explain the value flow between FI/SD and COPA?
We want to stop certain type of Misc. Debit Memos from posting to COPA. A manual pricing condition is mapped to a COPA value field. The GL account used for posting this kind of Debit memos (the GL account assigned to Account Key in VKOA) is already removed from the cost element group which was assigned to PA transfer structure frm FI.
Does anyone have some idea what other settings we need to be change so the Debit Memo does not do a posting to COPA. Is the posting happening due to the mapping of Manual Pricing condition to the COPA value field? Do we need to remove it to stop the posting to COPA?
We are on ECC 6.0. Does the posting go to COPA at the time of Sales Order creation or Billing document creation?

Hi,
You need to delete mapping of Manual Pricing condition to the COPA value field as that is also one of the main component through which value flows from SD to COPA.
But I am agree that if you don't consider your some of the debit memos to flow to COPA, then you will not be in a position to get clear picture in COPA as per your FI P&L. Actually your FI and COPA P&L (Generally you develop in COPA as per your required structure of P&L) will not be tallied.
Pls consider the same before removing the same assignement from PA transfer structure and assignment from COPA value field to SD condition type.
Thanks & Regards,
Taral Patel

Sales Office information not posted to COPA.

Dear Experts,
We have created a new distribution channel in our system. When we post invoices using the new distribution channel the sales office information is not getting posted to COPA.
Is their any missing configuration for this issue or any thing else.
Pls help to solve this out and how to correct the already posted information. For those, the sales office information is not avaliable in the COPA and those information are not picking up to the reports.
How to corrct this.
Many thanks in advance.
best Regards
Thanura

Hi,
yes, SALES OFFICE characteritc is activated.
Other distribution channals we are having, sales office information get posted to COPA. the issue we are facing is for the newly created one.
Best Regards,
Thanura

Movement type post to COPA or not?

Dear all,
Can any one tell me how to control if a movement type posted to COPA or not?
For example, movement type 201 (GI for cost center) only posted to cost center, movement type 901 (GI scrapping COPA) posting to COPA.
Actually I want to set one movement type for writeoff that posting to Cost Center and COPA.
Is it possible? And how?
Thanks a lot.
Kevin

Hi AP,
Yes, the COPA is active. Actually we already have posting to COPA.
My question is, material document for some movement types can post to COPA, and for other movement types can post to Cost Center.
I would like to know how to config the posting to COPA or Cost Center, and is it possible to post to COPA and Cost Center.
Thanks.

Stock transport order with movement type 643 - post to COPA

Hello SAP gurus,
We use movement type 643 to post good issues for stock transport order (intercompany process). The delivery type is NLCC. We recently implemented account-based COPA. At the time of post goods issue, cost of goods sold should be posted to COPA, but it didn't. Could someone help me figuring out how to push PGI to COPA for stock transport order? Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Cassandra Wong

The reason that PA segment is not populated in the good issue for STO is because the cost element of the COGS account was set to "01" instead of "12". I changed the cost element category and the PA segment is populated correctly.

Post to copa

hi,
1 may i know why price differen in migo or miro can directly post to copa?
2 may i know during migo, what information/data go to CO module?
thanks

1. Price difference in MIGO or MIRO is considered to be a direct cost, hence flows to the COPA
2. Duing MIGO, GR/IR posting is transferred to the COPA

Production Order Variance not posting to COPA

Hi,
I am hoping someone can help.
We settle our production order variances to COPA. - usually without any problem. The production orders settle to both Material (Mat) and PSG
However this month we had a situation where for 2 order there was no settlement to COPA for the variance.
For these 2 production orders there was no settlement rule to PSG in the master data so this obviously explains why it didnt create a settlement document but my dilemma is understanding why there is no PSG settlement rule.
Through testing it appears that the PSG settlement rule is not created at the time of production order creation at all but seems to be automatically created after the execution of KKS2 and CO88.
The 2 orders that I had issue with this month were for a new material and I am able to recreate this probelm for any new Production order against this new material. So I suspect that there is something specific to this material that is prveventing the PSG settlement rule from being created.
But this is where I am stuck! I can't find any setting in material master or other area that would seem to impact this.
Any help appreciated,
Thanks,
Tracee

Hi,
First you can settle these 2 orders individually with using KO88 Transaction code and see if there is any error. Also check the settlement profile of these 2 production orders.there you can check the " variances to costing-based PA" tick is there or not.If tick is not selected there,you can select the check box and run variance calculation (KKS2) and do the settlement for these 2 production orders (KO88).
I hope this wil help you and let me know if you have any queries.
Regards,
Puri.

From line item text field in Fi not posted to COPA characteristic field?

How do you create the link from the Line item Text field in FI to a characteristic field in COPA?
I tried to create a characteristic field Text. from the domain VBELN in COPA.
Although I can post from CRM the contract number to the Line itemText field in FI posting,
I can't get this contract number to post to a characteristic field in COPA.
Thanks,
Sony

program a bdc to tcode fb09
A.

No update for MFBF posting in COPA

Hi,
For all posting under transaction MFBF, no document has been updated in profitability segment(COPA).All FI - COPA differences have been poted manually in COPA.I have checked that Cost Element which has defined in OKB9 as aprofitability segment is ticked and that cost element has defined in COPA derivation rule with plant combination as well as that cost element is maped in KEI2.
Can anybody help us for solving that issue.
Thanks in advance.
Prabal

Hi Prabal da
Welcome to SDN!
If you are talking about consumption postings generated from back flushing from MFBF - Then the CO object is the Prod order or Cost Collector in such cases
Since, CO Object is already found, OKB9 does not work in this
Check your Prod order or Cost collector... The GI postings would already be lying there
If I have not understood your case properly, do let me know
br, Ajay M

Posting on COPA through BAPI

Dear Experts,
want to transfer some value in copa at the time of interface (Revenue and Cost booking).
financial data will be transferred from interface to SAP system.
Which bapi i will use in order to post data in COPA.FI is using standard bapi_ACC_doc_post but data will post only FI not CO.
valuable suggestion required on the same.
regards
RK

Hi,
For posting directly in CO-PA use BAPI_COPAACTUALS_POSTCOSTDATA. Otherwise, for the whole FI flow, you should use regular BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST (VALUEFIELD parameter for CO-PA).
Regards,
Eli

Billling Type RE credits posted to COPA

Hi,
The condition type that has been assigned to the billing type RE is associated with a balance sheet GAL account. We are not expecting to post this to CPA. The condition type not assigned to the CPA value field. Can some one explain the reason for posting this to CPA report.
Thanks,

Can you please provide more clarity to your questions regarding the followings?
1. Why the Condition for Returns is assigned to Balance Sheet Account? It should be a P&L account since this is revenue return.
2. Balance sheet accounts are NOT created with cost element,which is a prerequisite to flow in to COPA.
if you could provide more clarity, i could be able to advice you more precisely.

Incorrect VPRS posting in COPA which needs reversing

Hi all,
there is a issue on COPA:
In my pricing procedure, the cost is calculated twice. VPRS and FOC. In the order it appears correctly for both conditions but when the document is billed it misses the cost on VPRS and display O as inactive. But the FOC has the cost. In order to correct this I used OSS note 15462, and changed the calculation to 900 from 700 in VPRS.
The problem I am having is, this will resolve all the douments created going forward after the change is made but how can i correct the billing documents which are identified with incorrect postings to COPA. Coz ideally i need to reverse the incorrect ones and then post them with the correct posting. For which i think i need some user-exit... which I am not sure of.
i am new to COPA, have not much idea. Please help me how to solve this issue? and what are the other info required to solve this issue?
Thanks,
Jasmeet

You can try to use program RKERV002 (transaction KE4S) to re-transfer SD billing documents to CO-PA. Just select a range of billing docs or select by creation date equal to dates that were prior to your configuration change. Be sure to set the radio button option for reversal of line items to cancel the original posting and repost the new values in CO-PA.
Best Regards,
Jeffrey Holdeman
Enterprise Performance Management RIG
SAP BusinessObjects

SD order and data posting to COPA

Hi all,
hen saving an SD-order i have to (under any circumstances) change the product hierachy posted from SD to COPA structures.
Can anyone tell me at least where is the posting of the data to COPA in programs such MV45AF...?

Thank you Kshamata
the program flow don't activate this exit.
Anyway, I found other exits that are activated on billing document save (the ones in enhancement COPA005). I still cannot find a way to force a new value in the product hierarchy before it's saved in COPA.
Thank you by now.
Orazio

Post implementation COPA Issue - Variances not setteled for process orders

Hi Experts,
The client implemented COPA in the FY 2011. There were many process orders existing in the system prior to implementation of COPA. Now the client trying to archive the old process order and trying to set deletion flag and system throwing error message u2018variances were not calculated fullyu2019.
But client saying orders were settled and no variances existing prior to COPA implementation.
My queries are:
1. The orders are created prior to COPA Implementation and they were settled as well long back. After COPA implementation why system calculating variances once again.
2. How can I check whether the variances got settled for the process order? Please give me the report or transaction code?
3. Can I settle the variances to COPA Transfer structure now for the orders which were created before COPA Implementation and what will be the impact?
Regards
Sri laxmi

Hi Sri,
It should be settle the process orders before COPA implementations and find below my answers point by point.
1.System will not calculate again variance, once you settle the process orders, you can close the orders, so it will improve the system efficiency and system will those orders in future to calculate the variances.
2.are u try to close the order, if it is settle the order, system will allow to close the order or vice-versa.(T.code-ask PP consultants).
3.i have mentioned clearly, previous reply,it should not be open orders.
please let me know any further information is required.
thanks and regards
nagaraju sami

Posting In COPA PSG

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for