Posting period authorization for previous period for specific users

Hi Experts,
In our company we want to restrict normal users to present period only. (in FI).
we are having now two user groups core and normal. for core group both periods should be open. for normal users only have access for current period.
Please suggest how to achieve this requirement in FI.
Regards,
Vara
Moderator: Use authorizations groups in OB52. Please, search before posting

Hello,
You need to create a single role with whatever transactions you would like the users to proceed.
When you assign the users in the role, you assign for the period you would like. Once that period is over, no use is able to transact with those transaction codes.
Whenever, you make the changes to users in role, you need to do the user comparison, then only the profile get generated in the user masters.
Please discuss this with your security team with your requirement.
Regards,
Ravi

Similar Messages

Stock Posting for Previous Period

Hi all,
In case, there is a need to update stock for previous period (Stock Transactions: Initial Quantities Stock Tracking and Stock Posting /Stock Posting List ) e.g. Update stock at 31/12/08 where there are stock movements within 2009, there is a System Message : Item quantities are not updated for initial entry of stock balances date, Update Now ?Yes , No, Cancel
How we activate this message, in case that does not appear?
Thanks in Advance

Check this WIKI
[How to update stock quantities according to a previous date?|https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=25494266]

Manual postings to PCA for previous periods seems to get posted twice

Dear All,
Actual postings to PCA are performed manually using a custom job from SA38. Postings were made in FI for all previous (closed) periods . After running those jobs for previous periods to transfer those entries, some companies and accounts are showing duplicate amounts or just a balance on comparison ledger and not in base ledger. How to correct this.
Thanks a lot for your help

Hi
You will have to use 9KE0 or a custom job again to rectify this
Ajay M

"lock" values of tax depreciation for previous periods

Hi all,
is it possible to lock calculated values of depreciation for previous periods? We need it for the case when e.g. depreciation key is changed. Then we want preserve the values for previous periods and change only the future values. But please note that we want this for depreciation area, which does not post values to GL.
thanks
Zbynek

Hi,
It did not work for me. I changed the useful life from 30 to 20 yrs and then used menu path Edit/Recalculate values. Then I used the Tx S_ALR_87012936 to display the depreciation values for individual months. But all the values were the same, i.e. the values for previous periods were not kept.
So is there a way to keep these values?
thanks,
Zbynek

Can we run KSU5 - Assessment Cycle execute for previous periods

Dear Gurus,
Can we run KSU5 for previous periods. Means I have not ran from April 2008 onwards. Can I run right for all periods. Any inconsistencies arises for running the KSU5.
Please guide us.
Regards
Srinivas

Hi Srinivas,
You can run the Cycle for previous periods also using KISR transaction code. Here, you can select the processing period (previous period) and posting period (current period) and the Cycle and the Segments.
Note: If you want the postings to happen in the same corresponding processing periods, you need to check those periods to be open and consider other inconsistencies also.
Pls revert back for further assistance...
Srikanth Munnaluri

Stock in Transit quantity by batch for previous period

Hi all,
Is there any way to get the information of stock quantity for stock in transit by batch for previous period?
In standard SAP system, when the stock is issued with reference to STO with movement type 641, the stock will be stored in the system as stock in transit. As the stock is sit at plant level, the standard SAP report does not show what batch was issued.
I have a requirement to display stock value of previous period down to batch level. Hence, SIT of what batch of previous period should also be displayed.
Any idea of how this can done, or any workaround solution?
Thanks.
Tom

MB5T lists the difference between delivery goods issued and goods receipt to your POs, as so called virtual stock in transfer
MB52 lists the stock in transfer that had been done with inventory managment movements and was updated to MARC table.
you have to find the movements (use MB51) that posted the stock that you can see in MB52.
see info in OSS Note 982345 - FAQ: stock overview MMBE

Opening Balances for Previous Periods

Hi Experts,
There is a client requirement of entering opening balances for GL for previous periods before going live.
eg it is required to have OB for 2006,2007 and 2008 before live transactions are entered into the system.
Please enlighten on how to carry out this.
Regards,
Asap

Hi Asap,
You could only have one OB for one account. If those OB for different years are for different accounts, it is ok. Otherwise, you have 2006 OB only. You may create JE to get something like OB for 2007 and 2008.
Thanks,
Gordon

Vendor evaluation report to be run for previous period

Hi,
Is the possible to run the Vendor evaluation report for back date.
i.e. if the period of evaluation is 30 days, can we run the report for previous periods
Regds,
Ritesh

Depending on the library you are using, can you verify whether you can use one of the following variables?
1PERIK
1PERW
5ACPERI
6-PERIK
8WPERIO
All these variables use fiscal periods and not calendar periods, that way you don't have to bother about number of weeks in a period, unless you really need to do the calculation based on number of days in a period.
If your library does not support these variables, then pl copy one of these variables (GS11) with appropriate details into a custom variable and use it in your report.
Let me know.
Regards
Subodh

Costing for previous periods.

Hi Experts,
Is there any way to do the costing run for previous periods.
I would like to do std. cost estimation for 5th period, but now we are in 6th period.
System giving message as cost estimation can't be saved for past period.
CK075: Planning date is in the past -> cost estimate cannot be saved
SKS

Dear Seshagiri,
It's the standard SAP'e bahaviour and there is no meaning in costing for a past date.
Also in my understanding
1.If your Costing Run date is some future date ,but the Costing Date from,Qty Structure Date,Valuation
date is on system's date,then the system will allow to release the cost and the same can be checked
under Planned Price,Standard price under Current Column in Costing 2 view.
2.If your costing run date is current date & the valuation,Qty structure date is some future date,then the
system will not allow you to release the cost.
check and revert back.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

Authorization for gl account to specific user

Dear SAP Experts,
Cash GL Account-accounting to be authorized to specific User ID.
In breaf:
while post the document in cash gl account, they need to give authorization cash gl account wise per each user ID.
pls advice me...
Thanks in advance
venkat reddy

my client want give the authorization for gl account to specific user ids..
ex: let say chash gl account 410000.. we want to give the authorization to post in 410000 to user id 254109 only not fot all..
please give the solution..
regards
venkat reddy

Current period load and previous period load

Hi
when I look into some cube, its loading the full load data for Previous period as well as Current period.
the next day we r deleting the both over laping request and loading the same current and previous load .
could any one explain why this selection in infopackage in full loading.
why dont't we load with last posting period / Fiscal year selection into infopackage selection for full load.
Thanks
Ram
Message was edited by:
ram

Is the datasource is non delta enabled ?
If yes , den Full load is done always using the Overlapping Request Deletion in the Infopackage or DTP in BI 7.0 - so as to make all data available .
If ur willing to change the dates in the Infopackage filter daily ( u can rite some routine though ) den u can do that but if u want to automate all this process u go with Overlapping feature.

Current period time vs previous period time

Hi All,
I have to create a report which compare the sales period time..
for example variable 0calmonth period 0108 - 0208
product | current period 0108 / 0208 | previous period 0107 / 0207   | current - previous
TV        |      1000                              |            500                            |   500
Audio    |      100                               |             300                            | -200
its work great
but when I add 0calmonth in column query
product | current period 0108 - 0208 | previous period 0107 - 0207   | current - previous
0107
0207
0108
0208
0107
0207
0108
0208
0107
0207
0108
0208
TV           |     0   |     0 | 800   | 200     | 300    |   200 |    0      |    0    |   -300 |   -200 | 800    | 200   |
Audio    |     0   |     0 | 70   |     30     | 150    |   150 |    0      |    0    |   -150 |   -150 | 70      |    30   |
This is not what i want.
I want this.
product | current period 0108 - 0208 | previous period 0107 - 0207   | current - previous
0108
0208
0107
0207
0108-0107
0208-0207
TV        |   800                     | 200     | 300                           |   200   |   500           | 0              |
Audio    |    70                     |     30     | 150                          |   150    |   -80           |   -120         |
How do that?

Hi,
I think there is a way to do this, take normally first 4 fields, product | current period 0108 - 0208 | previous period 0107 - 0207 | current - previous
Then remove 0CALMONTH from columns and after that create a RKF by new selection, using sales Keyfig. with 0CALMONTH resticted to the value 0108, and next take a new selection and restrict the same with 0208.
Similarly restrict for remaining months also (0107 0207 0108-0107 0208-0207 ) so that it can be arranged in the order u want.
Hope this helps.
Rgs,
I.R.K

Updates for previously paid for apps that address stability issues, bug fixes, other improvements that a customer is entitled to

Why is the policy of Apple to prohibit customers from downloading FREE updates for previously paid for apps that address stability issues, bug fixes and other improvements that a customer is entitled to because the customer does not currently have a credit card on file that they can verify has an available balance??? I can understand it even for free apps or apps on sale or because most of those apps depend on in-app purchases but COME ON. Where is the ethics in that policy? Where is the consumer protection? Especially considering the ONLY marketplace to receive these third party products is through apple. INSANE.
Wasted another 3 or 4 hours today trying to find a solution. I am unable to provide alternative payment method and money is tight for next 2 weeks but this is temporary. It's not as if I will never be purchasing more apps and apple products in the future. I have been a loyal apple customer since the days when Power!ac 9500 retailed for $8,000.00. Another words for a very long time.
Anyone else find this to be a legitimate issue?

I am all for any instance where I am asked to verify my account or Apple ID. The issue is that I am being denied delivery of a beneficial update of a premium, already paid for app... Because I am (at the moment) maxxed out with my credit card I have associated with my Apple ID.
There are four different (full version) paid for apps that just all released major updates. The third party developers offer the updates for free to customers who have purchased the full version of the app and the update includes stability improvements, iOS 7 comparability, bug fixes and expanded functionality.
These are not apps that, in total, cost over $100... And that I use every day.
Never had an issue with being required to verify my account or Apple ID.

GR IR clearance for previous periods

HI,
Our client is trying to clear GR IR Account via F.13. The OB74 settings was configured as WAERS (Currency )as Criteria 1 and PRCTR (Profit Center) as Criteria 2 for the Account Type u201CSu201D. Because of this setting the GR IR account got wrongly cleared from the year 2007. Now we are changing the setting in OB74 to ZUONR (Assignment ) as Criteria 1 and VBUND (Trading Partner) as Criteria 2 for the Account type u201CSu201D. I have also ensured that the GR IR GL account has u201C014u201D Sort Key in FS00.
Now the solution for the issue is to reverse all the cleared documents which got cleared wrongly in the previous periods and to run F.13 in the current period. My query is - is it possible to reverse the cleared documents as there might be PO and GRs archived. Will the archived documents/POs/Grs effect the clearing in the current year. Please suggest.
Regards,
S.Sumana.

Hi,
I do not think you really need to reverse any documents. You just need to reset the clearing between GR and IR document using t-code FBRA.
Th system will give you errors if you try to reset archived documents. In that case you can talkk to the basis person and check if he can selectively reload the archived tables. However I think it is not advisable to change anything on closed Financial Years as the accounts are already audited and resetting even the clearing will have impact on provisons made for pending GRs.
Or the other option would be to post new entries for the Opening GRs and IRs in current year. The business and auditors will have to take a decision how they want to offset these new postings.
In any case if GRIR clearing took place incorrectly in previous year, the provisioning would have gone wrong, so the offset can be given to the same provisioning account.
Hope this helps.
Thanks and Regards,
Uma

Query for Previous Period Accumulated Dep

Can someone suggest me the best way to query the previous period accumulated depreciation for an asset.
I am facing with every way I have tried.
1st Way = Current Accumulated - Current Month Deprn (FA_DEPRN_SUMMARY). But in case of retired assets, the Current Accumulated becomes 0. So, this wudnt be a correct value to display.
2nd Way = Going back one period and taking the Accumulated Depreciation value. This is very problematic in queries. I got error for some dumb scenario I didnt test in the query. Apparently if there are more than 2 rows in FA_DEPRN_DETAIL, then 2 records will return instead of one.
Can someone help me out.
Regards

Hi,
Check why the amounts in accum dep is calculating less amounts?
If your dep key and dep rates are correct, then there is no problem with the dep calculations.
Still if you feel that, a particular asset is to be depreciated more than the planned dep, you must perform a unplanned dep postings with Tcode ABAA
Before doing this you must have been done the config for the unplanned dep via the below tcodes.
OABU, and AO95.
Then try to post run planned dep with ABAA now, since this will only create an internal asset accounting document for the date 31.03.2009.
So if you run the dep run for the 12 period (if you follow apr-mar) with repeat option and by selecting list assets and execute it.
Here you see an separate dep doc will be generated for unplanned dep for your asset.
hope this might help you.
Thanks,
Srinu

Posting period authorization for previous period for specific users

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for