Power Saver Problems M30-344 (CPU only uses 600MHz)

Hi!
In my m30-344 are changed mainboard and display.
At this time i can't use the full 1.5ghz of the cpu!
In the Power Saver Profile i can choose only the cpu-rate 1-3! I have now de-installed this tool and reinstalled the version by the net. But i can only use 600mhz!
What can i do?
[Edited by: admin on 07-May-05 08:18]

Hi
Just need a little more help on this! I rang up pc world today and they had no idea what i was on about with the micro code. The guy kept saying its because i have no prossessor intensive apps running so it would run at 600mhz, he also said that cpuz is probably reporting the wrong cpu speed.
I know this cannot be the case as in the bios it is set to high which will mean it will run at 1600mhz all the time and not drop to 600mhz. I also ran a game in the background, while raring a 600mb file with 6 ie windows open to no avail just to proove to him that it wasnt goin to 1600! :-)
But he still didnt understand! So i need some light shed on what this micro code buisiness is all about because i have to explain to them exactly what the problem is. I need some info on this by tuesday so i can send it off with the laptop! Any help kindly recieved!
Regards
maki43

Similar Messages

  • NB205-N210 Power Saver Problem

    Hi!
    Im haveing an error during install of the Power Saver software.
    I have Win XP SP3 (Hungarian) and when I try to install the software, it gives me this message:
    "1628: script based installation unsuccessful"
    I read after this, and they say that "Idriver.exe" makes the error, I tryed to disable it but I cant,
    Anyone can help me finding out how to install this vital part of software to my netbook, with out it the batter last only for about 3-4 hour (insted of 7-9)?
    Thank you very much in foreward!

    Microsofts Knowledge base suggests:
    Method 10
    If you get the message error "Error 1628: Failed to complete script based install"
    And followed the instruction above and it didnt resolve the problem and you just create fresh
    installation packet by using InstallShiled tool, please disable "Cache installation on local machine"
    option during the installation packet create process.
    Link http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555175
    So maybe it has something to do with temporary files.
    Go into c:\documents and settings\[your name]\Local Settings\Temp
    and delete all the files in there (close all other programs first, or do it in Safe Mode).
    Also try disabling your Antivirus software. They can sometimes block installations.

  • N96 V30.033 Power Saver Problems

    Hi there,
    I've just recently updated my N96 to V30.033 and now the power saver does not seem to work properly.
    I have an .swf animation set in the Power Saver options (power save timeout set to 30 secs). After 30 secs when it tries to go into power save, the animation comes up briefly, and then comes out of power save (back to the standby screen. or whatever screen you had open last).
    It will just keep doing this in a loop.
    It used to work on the last firmware, any ideas?
    The only way to stop this is not to use an animation.
    Thanks.

    Binx:This is definitly one of the problems comin directly from the firmware, because it used to work for me before as well and now all of a sudden with this **bleep** firmware, we are back to triangle of worst firmwares (V10, V11, V30)............
    Nokia N96-1 (RM-247)
    Firmware version: 30.033
    Made in Finland

  • Nokia 5300 - Power Saver Problems

    Hi!
    I have a 5300 and sometimes my Power Saver mode does not work.
    I'm sorry but I coudn't figure out the problem reprodution steps yet. All I can tell is that from a certain point beyond the power saver does not appear although it is activated. One way to correct this is to turn the phone off then on.
    Is Nokia aware of this problem?
    I found a similar post about another model, the suggested explanation resided on the operator's firmware, but in 5300's case the firmware is Nokia original...
    Thank's.

    I also tried formatting my memory card... that did not worrk either

  • Power Saver Problem

    Recently when I start my computer, I get a message fatal error power saver.  Any idea how I fix that?   Thanks

    Which computer? There is a label on the bottom?
    What do you mean by "turns off"? One of these?
       Hibernate VS Sleep VS Shut-Down
    -Jerry

  • Problem with Textfield autocomplete -- only uses the INSTR function

    Hi dev team,
    I use the new APEX "textfield autocomplete" item type and got a really damn problem with it.
    I have a table with an index on the same column which I want to search with the autocomplete field.
    Index:
    CREATE BITMAP INDEX TEST.GEO_DATA_IDX1 ON TEST.GEO_DATA (postcode)
    NOLOGGING TABLESPACE TS_INDEX;Select which is automatically generated by APEX 4:
    SELECT   a.*
      FROM   (  SELECT   DISTINCT postcode AS RV
                  FROM   TEST.GEO_DATA
                 WHERE   country_id = :P1_COUNTRY
              ORDER BY   1) a
    WHERE   INSTR ("RV", :p$_search_string) > 0 AND ROWNUM <= :p$_max_rows;
    -- plan
    Plan
    SELECT STATEMENT  ALL_ROWSCost: 4,308  Bytes: 45,31  Cardinality: 1,97            
         2 SORT UNIQUE  Cost: 4,307  Bytes: 45,31  Cardinality: 1,97       
              1 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE #TABLE# Cost: 4,306  Bytes: 47,311  Cardinality: 2,057  In APEX 3 I used the addon from Tyler Muth with my own Select:
    SELECT   DISTINCT
                postcode AS DV,
                postcode AS RV
         FROM   TEST.GEO_DATA
         WHERE   country_id = L_COUNTRY
         AND    postcode like l_search||'%'
         ORDER BY 1
    -- Plan
    SELECT STATEMENT  ALL_ROWSCost: 840  Bytes: 152,867  Cardinality: 13,897                                
         8 SORT ORDER BY  Cost: 840  Bytes: 152,867  Cardinality: 13,897                           
              7 HASH UNIQUE  Cost: 838  Bytes: 152,867  Cardinality: 13,897                      
                   6 VIEW VIEW index$_join$_001 Cost: 836  Bytes: 232,111  Cardinality: 21,101                 
                        5 HASH JOIN            
                             2 BITMAP CONVERSION TO ROWIDS  Cost: 31  Bytes: 232,111  Cardinality: 21,101       
                                  1 BITMAP INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX (BITMAP) #INDEX#
                             4 BITMAP CONVERSION TO ROWIDS  Cost: 45  Bytes: 232,111  Cardinality: 21,101       
                                  3 BITMAP INDEX SINGLE VALUE INDEX (BITMAP) #INDEX#Is there a chance getting my INDEX used by the new APEX item? I guess not. But I still want to ask before I rebuild everything. :)
    Best regards,
    Tobias

    Hi Tobias,
    I assume you are currently using "Contains & Case Sensitive" for the "Search" attribute. Have you already tried out "Exact & Case Sensitive"? Because that will internally use the LIKE operator as your original query does and because the % is at the end it should enable the use of an index. But it might still not work, because the ORDER BY might be executed at a different time than in your original example, but it's worth a try.
    Regards
    Patrick
    My Blog: http://www.inside-oracle-apex.com
    APEX 4.0 Plug-Ins: http://apex.oracle.com/plugins
    Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/patrickwolf

  • Problem with hierachy aggregation, only using last child to populate parent

    The following is a report that is dynamically generated:
    ACCOUNT         Cash
    2003 JAN          978,940
    2003 FEB          1,141,812
    2003 MAR          1,435,928
    2003 Q1          1,435,928
    2003 APR          1,663,463
    2003 MAY          1,740,351
    2003 JUN          1,758,067
    2003 Q2          1,758,067
    2003 JUL          2,124,283
    2003 AUG          2,022,984
    2003 SEP          2,470,520
    2003 Q3          2,470,520
    2003 OCT          1,522,778
    2003 NOV          1,550,067
    2003 DEC          2,741,664
    2003 Q4          2,741,664
    2003 TOTAL          2,741,664
    You can see that for some reason the hierachy is not adding correctly, as it is solely taking the last month of the quarter and saying that it is the quarter's numbers. And taking the last quarter's numbers and saying that it is the year's.
    I've also verified that it only occurs on asset and liability type accounts and not income and expense type accounts.
    How is this occuring? 
    Thanks,
    Michelle

    Hi Michelle,
    The data that you attached is totally correct from an accounting perspective. Since BPC is used mainly by finance people, it follows this perspective.
    Let me try to explain why this is correct;
    There is one big difference between balancesheet accounts (AST/LEQ in BPC) and profit and loss accounts (INC/EXP);
    Balance sheet accounts are always referring to a Period End closing amount which should always be the same for the total year, Q4 and the last month of a year (as shown in your example).
    Profit and loss accounts on the other hand should only show the amount that are posted to these accounts for the selected period, so the total year should be added up from jan-dec, and Q4 should be an adding up of oct-dec, etc.
    Periodic values (this period -/- previous period) for balancesheet accounts are only relevant for Cash-flow calculations and some movements that need to be reported on a periodic bases (ie Investments). Cash-flow is mostly calculated into a seperate account tree, Periodic investments, when a seperate subtable dimension (type s) is used, can standardly not directly be reported in Excel, but can be calculated in Excel by retrieving this period, the previous period and than calculate the difference for these two. Another solution might be to use a custom measure to do the trick.
    Hope this helps,
    Alwin

  • Early 2013 15" rMBP (LG) Screen and Power Save Problems

    OK, so the first frustration is that I have this new 15" rMBP set to never sleep while on power.  I routinely come back to it, only to find that I am logged out and all of my apps have been closed.  Very annoying.  But now also this:
    Only way to solve is to close lid and re-open or reboot.  Do you bright folks think this is firmware/software related or is it because I lost the lottery and got an LG screen?

    When you say NEW what do you mean by that? If it is older then a couple of weeks it really isn't NEW, at least the way I think (New is I bought it yesterday to several days ago). If it is less then 14 days old take it back and return it for a full refund. Apple has a 14 day No Questions Ask Return Policy for Full Refund. Then buy another that may work correctly.
    If older then 2 weeks then the only thing you can do it take it to Apple and have them fix it, if possible, or replace it with one that works correctly.

  • Toshiba Power saver may be the problem

    My Satellite A665-S6050 has had all of the symptoms you read about in these forums;
    crash, freeze, hung, locked, BSOD, Windows crash errors, etc.
      I bought the laptop new a couple years ago and both love it and hate it when it exhibits
    its freezing behavior. This is the intel I-3, 4 GB ram, Windows 7(64 bit) version. Really nice
    when it's running normally.
      I have watched and read through hundreds of posts throughout these forums since my purchase.
    I have never sent the laptop back to Toshiba. Primarily because I've been able to force power off
    then on, go to safe mode, schedule a disk scan on the next power up, reboots normally and I'm good
    for who knows how long.
      Following suggestions you can read in these forums, I have upgraded the Intel HD graphics display driver.
    I install Windows updates every time they come available(auto update is enabled). I've updated the
    Toshiba bios. I've updated Firefox every time it is available(my favorite browser). Updated java and
    flash(again automatic updates). Some user settings that I've changed; I've disabled sleep mode(set it
    to 'never' under 'advanced power settings) in every power scheme I have. I only use 'High Performance'
    power scheme(plan). I have the setting for turning off the hard drive set to 'never'. My rational for doing
    this is there is just too much going on under Windows 7, all the time. You never know what's running in the
    background. Many times as the laptop freezes and or Windows tries it's best to recover, I get a strong feeling
    that the hard drive has shut off! Especially, when Windows is trying to save a dump but can't because it can't
    access hd0(hard drive)(I have to force power cycle off/on to recover).
      This brings me to my current state of this troubleshooting saga. The last time the laptop froze, I was watching
    streaming video in one Firefox window and had a slide show playing in another Firefox window(2 windows, not
    2 tabs). Then in the lower right corner I get the Toshiba power saver notification that it is shutting down the
    optical drive. It goes away on it's own in about 10 seconds. But immediately everything gets real slow until every
    freezes. Windows tries to save a dump but can't. Windows tries to reboot itself but can't. Shows me a screen to
    modify the boot list because the hd0 is not available. So, as so many times before I have to hold the power
    button down for force power off. Wait a few, then power on, do my thing with safe mode, check disk, etc.
    Power up and boots normally. Runs great for who knows how long. Right now as I type this, I have a audio CD
    in my optical drive with Windows Media player set to 'replay' continuously. This I hope will prevent the 'Toshiba
    power saver' from getting triggered because the optical drive is not idle and therefore won't shut off the hard
    drive too! I have no idea how I can prove that 'Toshiba Power saver' is causing these freezes, crashes, lock ups,
    etc. But at least if I can keep the optical drive in use and therefore prevent the 'power saver' from kicking in
    maybe I can eliminate that as a possible cause of the freezes.
      I am really disappointed to read so many Toshiba owners sending their computers to Toshiba service
    hoping and praying for resolution but getting no satisfaction in the end. I love my Toshiba and I'll keep it.
    I am a recreational user. Don't need to save power. When I use my computer, I want it to function as
    powerful as possible until I intentionally perform a normal Windows shutdown.
      My employer supplies me with a laptop (different brand). It has Intel I-5 chip, 3 GB ram Win XP Pro..
    I run that computer full speed 9 -10 hours a day and I may have to reboot maybe once every other week.
    Not bad considering the abuse I put it through. I would hate to have to rely on this Toshiba for work. I
    don't think it could stay fully operational for that period of time.
      Please Toshiba, tell me how I can help with the troubleshooting of this seriously pervasive problem on
    so many of your computers. Is there an event log I can provide? Windows dump files(when they do get
    saved)?  Help me help you resolve this problem and satisfy hundreds of your customers.
    Thank you in advance for your time.
    Doug

    Jerry,
      It happened again this afternoon. This is the first time my system froze since the last time
    I reported here in the forum. And just like I reported earlier, Toshiba Power Saver turned off
    the optical drive power, I saw the pop-up in the lower right corner to notify me of the event.
    I had Toshiba 'PC Health Monitor' running and minimized. I clicked on the icon to restore it
    to the desktop. It displayed as expected. The hard drive graphic looked normal and spinning
    as usual. I clicked on the graphic of the spinning hard drive and expected 'Power Options' to
    display. Instead my desktop went away(all icons, system tray, system notification area, launch
    pad, etc), everything gone. The graphic of the spinning hard drive stopped spinning. I tried a
    CTL+ALT+DEL and got a new pop-up from Windows that it couldn't respond and I had 2 options;
    press ESC or hold the power button down to force power and a shutdown. Which is what I eventually
    did.
      Powered up, went to safe mode, scheduled disk check on the next restart. Disk check runs and
    finds no problem. System runs normally again.
      As far as finding these events in the Windows logs using 'Event viewer', is not going to help.
    I know exactly what time this all took place. I just can't find any event log showing that it took
    place. There's a small gap in the time stamps just before the event until a few minutes after the
    event. Then I see a mixture of 'errors' and 'information' events after the power on and restart
    but nothing specifically addressing the hard drive before the restart.
    I see an event log; "Previous shutdown was not expected". I'm sure that's not what your asking
    to see.  I don't know if it would be possible to trace the 'Toshiba Power Saver' but that may be
    the only way I could prove my point that it is shutting off power to both the optical drive and
    the hard drive at the same time.
    Is there a way to disable or remove Toshiba Power Saver without causing a more serious problem?
    Thank you in advance for your time and expertise.
    Doug.

  • Pages '09 only uses one processor core?

    Hello,
    some days ago i had to open a document containing nearly 2.000 pages. Don't ask why.
    Working with this document was quite complicated because Pages was responding very slowly. I used the activity monitor to see what was going on and i recognized that Pages only uses one core of my eight core MacPro.
    I tested iWork on my iMac and MacBook Pro (both DualCores) as well: same problem.
    Does iWork only use one processor core?
    Kind regards,
    roman

    How much memory do you have in your system? I'll bet if you check activity monitor (applications/utilities) and go to system memory tab therein you will see lots of page outs. This happens with huge docs and little memory as the doc is being swapped between active operating memory and the hard disk The only way to solve this problem is to get more memory (not storage) in your system. For a 2,000 page doc you're going to need lots and lots and lots of extra gigs of memory. By the way - how big is the too big file of yours?
    Number of processor cores isn't going to solve the issue if you have pageouts. It is a system memory/size of document issue and completely unrelated to how many processor cores you are using.

  • Adobe Media Encoder only using single core of CPU (core parking has already been disabled and did not solve the problem)

    I only edit videos every few months and the last time I edited a video was around 6-9 months ago.  At that time, I noticed AME was only using a single core of the CPU and contacted Adobe who instructed me to disable core parking, which worked.  After disabling core parking AME used 100% of all 12 logical cores to process the video and all was good.  Then last week, I decided to edit another video and noticed AME was very slow and checked and it was again only using a single core to process the video, but core parking is still turned off.  By slow I mean that a 10 minute video with the lens distortion correction preset and one video transition effect is estimated to take nearly 3 hours to complete.  For comparison, the GoPro software processed the same clip with the same effects in 20 minutes.  Also, through troubleshooting with Adobe over the last few days, I have also tried downloading previous versions of the software but the prior versions have the same issue.
    The video I'm trying to edit was shot on a GoPro Hero 4 Black with 1080p Wide at 60 frames per second.  The default video format for GoPro is .mp4.   The output settings I'm using when I export from Premiere Pro to AME are H.264 with the YouTube 1080p HD.
    My system:
    ASUSSabertooth X79
    Intel core i7 4930k (6 physical cores, 12 logical cores)
    16GB DDR3 Quad channel RAM
    Samsung 830 SSD 128GB
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 (not CUDA compatible, I know)
    Please ask if you need any additional information to help solve this problem.

    This has been driving me CRAZY... so going over the message boards from 2 to 5 am this morning I found the best explanation I have seen.   The problem is that Adobe Creative Cloud is NOT "Processor Group Aware".  Windows parses any more than 36 cores into "Processor Groups" and while the Pro version of Windows 7 & 8 can handle 256 threads they have to spread them across multiple processor groups.
    Simple Version:  AREA | How many cores does 3ds Max support?
    Microsoft's Explanation:  Processor Groups (Windows)
    Clearly, this is an Adobe Problem... If any engineers are reading this PLEASE review the below and incorporate it into your next build of Creative Cloud!!!
    https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/dn653313%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
    Again, I bought a VERY expensive machine based on your white paper that recommended Dual Xeon Workstations.  Please, Please Give us the product you PROMISED!!!
    Michael

  • IMovie only using 50% CPU power

    Hi,
    When I export my project in iMovie my CPU usage holds at 50%. I accept this does mean I can do other things but would like the export to go faster.
    Is this usual for iMovie to only use 50% CPU (and only about 1gb of RAM (of 8gb)) or do I need to do something?
    New to Macs so any help appreciated.
    dcbevan

    Hi
    As I get it - Doesn't iMovie take full use of multiple core processors. Not even Pro
    applications does this to 100%
    BUT
    RAM - iMovie or FinalCut are not that RAM hungry - 1 to 2 GB would be OK
    Free Space on Start-up hard disk - VERY IMPORTANT
    • 25Gb my minimum for iDVD
    • 10Gb my minimum for iMovie
    • 5Gb and iMovie runs slow and instable
    • <1Gb and iMovie might not run OK at all
    Other applications running in paralell - results in bad performances
    • Energy Saver
    • Do not spinn down hard disks
    • Use of USB/USB2 external hard disks = Slow and bad performances especially when getting full
    FireWire or internal e-Sata performs best.
    • Screen savers - may be (by directing it to an empty folder - I got the feeling of slight increase
    in performances)
    My list on howto speed up iDVD Slightly - might also applie on iMovie.
    *Speed up iDVD*
    To speed up iDVD
    TO GET IT TO WORK SLIGHTLY FASTER
    • Minimum of 25Gb free space on Start-Up hard disk - if less than 5Gb slow and unstable - less than 1Gb might even not start.
    • Choise of encoding method will give very different productions speeds. On my d-G5 2GHz
    *Professional Quality (movies + menus up to 120 min.)* - BEST
    Takes about 2 x times the other ones - but if quality is of essence
    (Quality might be as good as or even better for movies under 60 minutes - by using Best Performances BUT not for movies up to 120 minutes)
    2 hour movie + menu = about 4 hours to encode at it’s best on my system
    *Best Performances (movies + menus less than 60 min.)* - High quality on final DVD
    1 hour including menu = about 1 hour to encode
    *High Quality* (in iDVD08 or 09) / Best Quality (in iDVD6) *(movies + menus up to 120 min.)* - slightly lower quality than above
    2 hours including menu = about 2 hour to encode
    • Use an as simple DVD-menu possibly without any animation at all. This reduces processing speed dramatically. I use ”Old Theme - and Brushed Metal” and animation turned off.
    • An as fast Mac and as many cores/CPUs possibly. My PowerMac G5 has two CPUs and iDVD uses about 120% = use more than only one CPU/Core. How many it can address I don’t know (anyone ? )
    • If possibly - Use two internally e-Sata drives - Drive access takes a great deal of time
    else FW-800 or FW-400 or USB2 or network storage (slowest and near to useless)
    to work on one (internal, boot, Mac OS, Start-up hard disk - will be BAD - and slow
    Normally my d-G5 2GHz takes about 2 x movie material when iDVD and Mac OS on one internal HD and material is on the other internal one.
    Now with material on an external USB2-drive and an external Lacie FW-400 as Start-up drive material of about 1.5h will need about 4-6 hours to get encoded and burned to DVD.
    Choise and use of hard disks is essential.
    • I guess that a Solid State Disks might improve speed
    • No other programs running in BackGround eg EnergySaver, Internet, AirPort, Bluetooth etc.
    • Don’t let HD spinn down or be turned off (in EnergySave)
    • Move hard disks that are not to be used to Trash - To be disconnected/turned off
    • Goto Spotlight and set the rest of them under Integrity (not to be scanned)
    • Set screensaver to a folder without any photo - then make an active corner (up right for me) and set
    pointer to this - turns on screen saver - to show that it has nothing to show
    • If Mac with only place for one internal hard disk. Then I would try to use an external FW (Mac OS Extended) one as Start-Up hard disk and store material on the internal one.
    eg iMac or ProBook or alike.
    from Karsten -
    • I assume that resolution and codec of source is another factor ... scaling (e.g. 1280x720 to 720x576 = that is an 'un-even' calculation). or, a difference in speed reg. to h264, dv-stream or aic as input ....
    Yours Bengt W

  • Satellite M30: Power Saver options missing after motherboard replacement

    Hi all,
    I've just received my laptop back from the service center, and unsurprisingly they stuffed up a feature that used to exist!
    I had taken my laptop (M30 1.7GHz Special Edition) to the repair center for a defect and they informed me that the motherboard needed to be replaced. I received the laptop back a couple of days ago and I immediately noticed the laptop getting overheated, the fan did not turn on as frequently as it used to when setting the profile to "Full Power".
    After hours of investigation, I noticed that a few options that used to exist in the Toshiba Power Saver does NOT exist anymore. Thus, I feel my laptop is running as in battery optimised even though it's set to full power.
    As I said, the fan is not turning on as frequently, leading to the laptop getting overheated. While the fan used to be almost constantly ON on full power prior to the replacement of the motherboard.
    Here's how the power saver used to look like "prior" to taking the laptop to the repair center:
    http://www.foxpop.com/imre/2006/toshibatecram3review/toshibapowersaver1.gif
    And here's how the power saver looks like now, after the replacement of the motherboard:
    http://www.ixbt.com/portopc/toshiba-satellite/power.png
    with the CPU processing speed maximum of 3, instead of 4.
    Notice how I'm now missing the "CPU control method" option, and I'm unable to set the processing speed to more than level 3!
    The cooling method does not seem maximum performance to me either, due to the symptoms I mentioned above.
    Any idea on why that might have happend? Please note that I used the system recovery CD and returned everything to the factory settings, still no luck. I'm sick and tired of going back to their lousy repair center. If someone can point out the problem I will be very grateful.
    P.S. I'm using version 7 of the power saver, BIOS verion 1.4 (original)
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi
    I wonder why you did not contact the service guys again.
    After the reparation everything should works fine and if the notebook does not run properly you should immediately report it! In my opinion its a warranty claim.
    However, in my knowledge after the motherboard replacement the micro code on the board must be updated therewith the CPU could run with full performance.
    What CPU speed appears in the windows system?
    Im not 100% sure if the missing microcode update is responsible for your problem but I would recommend asking the ASP for opinion.

  • Windows XP Mode (Virtual PC) only uses half a CPU core/thread.

    Not only does windows xp mode not support multiple cores, to me it looks like it only uses half a core/thread.
    I noticed this because I just setup windows xp mode (virtual pc) on my computer.  I updated it, joined it to our domain and then installed our legacy ERP software.  This ERP software was designed and programmed to run on windows 98 or 2000, I can't
    remember right now, but its hardware requirements are very low.  This software runs very slows in the virtual pc, with the processor being the problem.  
    Matching the processor spike on the virtual pc using both performance monitor and task manager I compared it to task manager running on the host (my windows 7 machine).  The spikes in cpu matched one of the threads on my i7 processor (I use threads
    because an i7 has 8 threads but only 4 cores).  To my surprise when the CPU reached near 100% on the virtual PC the same spike on the host was only about 50% of the cpu thread.
    The host has a i7 950, 3.07GHz processor.  So this means that the virtual pc can only use up to 1.5GHz.  I have not run into the problem reported in other posts on this forum where the CPU is always at 50% or 100% on the virtual PC because when
    their is no activity the CPU drops to 10% or less and stays there.
    I will now have to use vmplayer, problem is having enough xp licenses for all users.
    Was anyone else aware of this?

    You can't use a half a thread.  Windows VPC uses one core at 3.07GHz, there's no halving the speed of the CPU. 
    The only way WVPC would use a lower clock speed is if there is power management throttling the CPU speed down.  Do you have a power management setting throttling your CPU?  Are you sure the problem is the CPU and not disk or network related? 
    Task manager on the host is not a very accurate way to determine CPU usage of the VM.
    If you have the correct version of Windows 7 (Pro or higher) there are no issues with XP Mode licenses, you get one license included with Windows 7.  There's no restriction requiring you to use XP Mode with Windows VPC, it will work under 3rd party
    virtualization solutions.

  • N79 Power Saver Theme Problem

    I bought an N79 just last mounth.
    it's a sweet phone but i have an small problem.;
    when i choose a theme for power saver (Date, text, slide show , ....) it have been shown for only 2 seconds and disappear and screen goes to BLACK.
    even i choose longest time for power Saver but it did not work.
    anyone has problem like this? any idea?
    Does NOKIA fix this problem in new firmware?
    how can i report this BUG to NOKIA?
    thanks
    Nokia N79 4GB
    SW Version: 32.001 RM-348 MEA

    I really doubt this is a deliberate design. Most other Nokia phones have the same "power saver" which pops up when the phone is idle, and all of them - even current ones - are set up so that:
    1) The power saver appears after its timeout
    2) The backlight switches off after its own, independent timeout
    3) The power saver remains shown regardless of the phone's current state
    Why would the Power Saver have its own timeout and selection of Power Saver screens designed to show you the date and time, if it can only be shown for 2 seconds? I'm disappointed that Nokia support is disregarding this issue, but I assume it's more out of ignorance and a stock response than any insight into their plans for future firmware updates. Is there a "bug report" page or something we can use to ensure it's properly logged and not just dismissed?
    Help I'm trapped in a sig factory.

Maybe you are looking for