PowerMac G5 dual core resolution

I'm having problems reaching the native resolution on a 26" Dell W2607C LCD-TV.
Should the factory fitted nvidia 6600LE (PCI Express) be able to support 1366x768 pixels? I've read that the single-link DVI port supports up to 1920x1200.
PowerMac G5 Dual Core 2.0GHz Mac OS X (10.4.3)

been a bit foolish here...
installed switchresx, unable to make custom resolution 1366x768 active. Then realised monitor was connected to DVI-2 so moved it over to DVI-1 and restarted G5. Voila I have a host of new resolutions that fit the bill perfectly.
Just not sure whether it would of worked without switchresx!
Thanks for the advise.

Similar Messages

Which is better for Pro Tools LE-PowerMac G5 Dual-Core 2.3Ghz or Dual 2.7Gh

I'm starting a small recording studio and I own a PowerMac G5 Dual-Core 2.3Ghz with 2GB of RAM and a PowerMac G5 Dual 2.7Ghz with 2GB of RAM. I need to keep one of them to run Pro Tools LE. Both G5's have the same hard drives and similar graphics cards..Does anyone know which would do a better job and if so why ??? Thanks..

Hi popped!
You have posted your inquiry, in the Discussions Forum, that is intended for discourse about the use of Apple Discussions.
You will get more attention to your issue, if you select a more appropriate location from this page Discussions Forum Home.
Perhaps posting in one of the Power Mac G4 & G5 Forums, would generate more interest.
Good Luck!
ali b

Video card upgrade for powermac g5 dual core

will the NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GT Graphics Upgrade Kit for Mac Pro work with a PowerMac G5 Dual Core?

Unfortunately, no. Although both cards are PCI-Express the difference in the card's ROM (the G5 card needs an Open Firmware compatible ROM, whereas the Mac Pro needs an EFI compatible ROM) make them incompatible.
Assuming you currently have the nVidia GeForce 6600, you could upgrade to either the nVidia 7800GT (was originally a build-to-order option) or ATi's X1900GT. Both are available from OWC and are very similar in speed to each other. Both are considerably faster than the 6600.

Powermac G5 Dual Core 2.0 GHZ or Macbook Pro Dual Core 2.0 GHZ

I have a Macbook Pro Dual Core 2.0 GHZ that currently has 1 GB of RAM in it. For the most part it runs fine, but I do come into problems with it sometimes while I'm doing video editing which is my main usage for my computer. I currently run Final Cut Studio 2. Would it be worth it to sell this computer and get a Powermac G5 Dual Core 2.0 GHZ or 2.3 GHZ and upgrade the RAM to 8 GB to help my video editing run smoother? The reason why I am considering this is because I would like a computer that would work better with my video editing at a cost that I can afford. I also would like to have a firewire 800 port for my external hard drives. I rarely use my internal hard drive, so that is no factor in my decision. Currently I cannot afford a new Mac Pro, but will be buying one in about a year. I'm just trying to decide if this would be a good switch for right now. Thanks for your help.
Message was edited by: hb8788
Message was edited by: hb8788

Although I don't own a Mac Pro, rumor has it that they run video chores significantly more efficiently than do the last generation G5's. I bought my 2.3 GHz, w/the 7800 card, for $600, last November on eBay. The case wasn't cosmetically perfect (a rather nasty looking crimp on the front handle) but it has performed well running my video (EyeTV and recording) and academic (I teach math & Mathematica) needs. I picked-up extra memory (it now has 6 Gigs) pretty cheap (around $75, IIRC), from Kingston. I also took the advice of many here and got a WD 640GB HD that made a significant difference in both boot-time and opening applications. However, if you're going to get a new Mac Pro in a year, it's almost like throwing money away - the G5 will probably have its' depreciation rate decrease once the software vendors no longer continue supporting pre-Intel machines. That being said, my G5 is more than sufficient handling my present version of Mathematica - I don't think that paying $3000, or whatever it takes to get a new Mac Pro, would balance the marginal increase of utility I would get using Mathematica. If I were a video guru, I might feel differently. I thought I could give you a definitive yes, buy the G5, because I really love mine. Unless something happens, I plan on having it for at least a few years. At about $250/year, if one figures that I'll have owned it for a total of 3 years, that's less than 70¢/day. But I also value the opinions of many of the posters who have commented on the new machine's speed, compared to the 2.5 GHz Quad, say.

Flash a PC Geforce 8400GS 512MB PowerMac G5 Dual-Core 2GHz?

Ok so today I picked up a PowerMac G5 off craigslist (2GHz Dual Core 512MB ram [added 4GB i removed from PC ) so its sitting at 4.5GB of DDR2,). guy thought it was broken and gave it to me for 30 bucks. i put a new battery in it, along with pressing the button next to the PCI-E slots. cleaned it out, and fired it up. came right up. reinstalled Leopard and might i say it FLIES. (im coming from a hackintosh, and already LOVING this).
only problem is the video card is a joke. I have my old Geforce 8400GS 512MB sitting around not being used. I wonder if I would be able to flash it with the G5 rom so I can use it on here? I have googled, and I came up with nothing. thanks for any help!
nick

We see a lot of people here say their "Mac Pro G5" or G5 Mac Pro" and "well they both LOOK the same on the outside!"
Open Firmware was the heart of Power architecture for 1997? until the switch to Intel architecture that was begun even earlier but under wraps.
PCs use BIOS, you won't find EFI or now UEFI, and Apple takes a standard but proprietary implementation.
Which is why you can't even get basic video out except with branded cards that have $100+ premium.
Because Apple used an 8800GT, there were some flashed PC cards, and as long as it was based on the same reference (G92?) and had a large enough ROM, there were some. $200 for flashed 8800GTs on ebay though dried up, too many problems it seems with solder joints and quality as well as over 3 yrs since manufactured.
Even the ATI 1900XT used in some PCI Express G5s was/is different than the ATI X1900 used in early Mac Pro ($449, $250 extra when BTO) even though 1900 and 1950s for PC were out, were half the price, they could not be cross-flashed. There were some PC cards that were to work in Mac Pro, but limited.
Shame that ATI 5770 or 6750 ($170) PC cards can't be used, even if only half the VRAM could be seen.

POwerMac G5 Dual Core vs Dual Processor

Am thinking about upgrading my G4 computers and going to the G5 Powermac. More than likely a dual processor or dual core. What is the difference between the dual processor and dual core? Is there any difference between these re: efficiency and how they work overall?

A "dual processor" refers to two physically distinct and separate chips. A "dual-core" refers to 2 processors on a single chip, often sharing certain resources (eg cache, memory, etc).
As far as I know, the only dual processor G5 Apple currently offers, is the Quad, or 2 dual-cores. The 2 GHz & 2.3 GHz machines, have only a single chip with dual-cores (2 processors on each chip), to the best of my knowledge.
To the best of my knowledge, having separate chips is better whenever possible, than multiple-cores (processors) on a single chip, because multiple cores have to share resources.
However, if you can only have a single chip, multiple-cores (2 processors) are advantages. It won't double your productivity, but should give it least a 40-60% boost. This assumes that the specific software you are running, takes advantage of multiple cores. A lot of software does not take advantage of multiple cores, and having a multiple-core machine is a waste.

Boot up intermittent on PowerMac G5 Dual-Core

I have an older G5 PowerMac Dual 2.0 10.4x and just recently it will not start up. I get an apple on screen and no spinning loading icon below it then the fans start to ramp up. I end up having to do a power down with the power button. Other times the computer starts up just fine. I've zapped the PRAM and failed to start from a 10.3 install disc in which it just hangs when using either the "c" key or selecting the CD as a startup disc in the preferences.
Anyone out there have similar experiences? And what possible solutions?
Thanks for the input.

Might be time to replace the PRAM Battery, 4 years is close to their lifespan, far less if ever without AC power, & can cause strange startup problems...
See which one your G5 has...
http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Newer%20Technology/CR2032/
http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Newer%20Technology/BAA36VPRAM/
Another problem is the lead free solder...
If you're sure the RAM is good, try the Hair Dryer trick...
http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=13240047#13240047
https://discussions.apple.com/message/15223603#15223603
https://discussions.apple.com/message/15499912#15499912
https://discussions.apple.com/message/15613068#15613068
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/3270112
https://discussions.apple.com/message/16053892#16053892
No power light at all...
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/3692775?tstart=0
It can show on any G5, and even many other computers & electronic devices of the period.
http://www.macintouch.com/reliability/pmg5.html
http://lowendmac.com/ppc/power-macintosh-g5.html
And see this last one in particular...
https://discussions.apple.com/message/16781690#16781690
Heat gun better...
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/3916312?tstart=0

1 To (2x500 Go) inside PowerMac G5 Dual-Core: RAID 0 ?

Hy,
I would like to know if I must formate my hards disks (2x500 Go) in RAID 0. Which are the advantages of RAID 0 for Final Cut Pro ? Really faster and powerful ? Separate the capture scratch and render files on two differents disks accelerates really the performances of CPF ?
Thank in advance.

I would go with an external SATA enclosure for video. You would notice a huge improvement with 4 or more drives in a RAID 0 for some good action.
Look into Firmtek and Sonnet for their products, they're both really nice. If you're looking to just start out with a 2-drive array look into the Firmtek products, they're affordable and very reliable.
I wouldn't stripe a RAID 0 in the G5 since you need one of those bays to boot with. You can always add an internal drive bracket for additional drives but that has its disadvantages as well.
Good luck.

1 To inside my PowerMac G5 Dual-Core: RAID 0 or not ?

Hello,
I would like to know if I owe formate my hards disks (2x500 Go) in RAID 0. Which are the advantages of RAID 0 for Final Cut Pro ? Really faster and powerful ? Moreover separate the capture scratch and render files on two differents disks accelerates really the performances of CPF ?
Thank in advance.

I have a 2 drive RAID 0 and actually startup off it as well use it for most of my editing. It works very well. I'm using 2 Western Digital 400GB SATA RAID Specific drives (Western Digital RE and Maxtor Maxline 3 drives are designed for RAIDs). The resulting volume is 800GB. My benchmarking utilities place the array's performance at almost exactly 2x the speed of one drive -- about 100MB/s. You will need a 3rd drive with OSX on it to create the volume, however once you've created it, you can just run the OSX installer as normal.
One negative aspect: If one of the drives fails, you will lose a all the data from both drives. With a 1 drive setup, you will only lose only the data on that particular drive, preserving the other drive. Consider a backup solution if you're serious about your work.
Another thing: The drive should be the same size and preferrably the same brand and model if you want to avoid problems.

PCIe Slot Speeds - G5 Dual Core 2.0

Hi Gang
I've been in touch with FirmTek support about a possible conflict - irregularity with regard to a SeriTek/2ME4-E installed in slot number 3.
They're claiming;
"The PowerMac G5 Dual Core PCIe slots 2 and 3 share bandwidth. If you install a fast card in slot 3 and a slower FireWire/USB card in slot 2, the bandwidth of both slots is reduced to the speed of the slowest card. This improper configuration could easily cause the issues you are experiencing."
Unless I'm missing something, according to this diagram, I believe slots 2 & 4 share the same bandwidth? Or it would appear that the MIDDLE PCIe slot is the faster of the two others - yes?
http://www.locationstudio.net/PCIe%20Speeds%20G5%20Dual%20Core.jpg
And here's what I have installed;
http://www.locationstudio.net/Slot-3-PCLe.jpg
I'm still leaning on replacing the SeriTek/2ME4-E with a Multi-Port FW800 card, since my other drives are all connected via FW800. Can't take the chance of having additional data corrupted or deleted.
Thanx for your thoughts
Mike

Another consideration:
The Firmtek controller can accommodate (max with no allowance for overhead) 384 MB/s bandwidth, but a FW800 controller can only accommodate max with no allowance for overhead) 98 MB/s.
As well, with a bit of research on the HyperTransport link which connects the Mid Bridge to the North bridge, I found an interesting comment in a HyperTransport Technology Consortium document which suggests that I/O devices of high latencies (slow) can have a dramatically adverse effect on the overall performance of the bus
A problem relative to...the presence in a system of a very slow I/O device that is the target of posted requests. This situation can cause other registers in the system to experience *large and unpredictable latencies*.
This seems to support the, albeit poorly phrased, claim by Firmtek that the combination of the devices may be the source of the issue.
This is interesting stuff (says the geek in me). More reading.......
Further reading of this document continues to peak my interest and provide further support to the claim from the Firmtek rep:
http://www.hypertransport.org/docs/twgdocs/HTC20031125-0035-0009.pdf
A Ha! Firmtek specs stipulate that the card is PCIe 4x:
http://www.firmtek.com/seritek/seritek-2me4-e/spec/
If I suggested otherwise, my apologies!
Message was edited by: japamac
Message was edited by: japamac

Mac Mini Dual Core vs PowerMac DP G4

I am considering purchasing a Mac Mini Dual Core to replace my PowerMac DP 1.25Ghz G4 . I'm worried whether I will be happy , and if it will be faster than my G4. The app's I run most are univeral binary or will be soon , so I'm thinking , yes. But I would feel more comfortable if I could get some solid input from some power Mac user's experienced or knowledgeable with the new Mac Mini
PowerMac DP 1.25 Ghz , 1.5GB RAM Mac OS X (10.4.5) Dual 80GB Seagate Barracuda drives

I can't imagine that an Intel Mac mini would ever be "faster" than a dual-processor G4 tower for most operations. The comparisons that Apple advertises, like "4X faster" are all against single-processor PowerPC Macs. Mac OS X does a good job at managing dual PowerPC processors.
Although the new Intel Mac mini now has a faster system bus, you're MUCH more limited by the use of portable-size hard drives (for example, your PowerMac probably has over a 100GB drive to start with and could have 500GB without much cost). If you want to max-out the RAM on the new Intel Mac mini to 2GB, it will cost you $300 more. So, a 1.66GHz Core Duo Mac mini with a 120GB hard drive and 2GB of RAM is $1,224.00 (US). If I were you, I would, without question, keep the PowerMac and invest in a newer Super Drive and/or hard drive(s) before giving it up.
-Doug

Using FCP 4.5HD and a PowerMac dual/dual core model ...

I'm currently using a PowerMac dual 2.0 Mac and am running FCP 4.5HD without any problems ... PERIOD! However, I'm now considering a move to the next level of Power Macintosh (the dual/dual core model that's currently available on the Apple Web Store) and just wanted to ask has anyone had any problems with the newer systems running the older version of FCP 4.5HD? Not to sure I want to fork over those big bucks to upgrade to FCP 5 unless it's necessary.
Thanks for any input on this matter.
G5 PowerMac Dual 2.0 Mac OS X (10.4.3)

Thanks for your input ... looks like I'll be moving up to FCP5.0 a bit quicker than planned. Hacks of anything always come back to bit me ... AT THE MOST STRESSFUL TIMES! ... and since I'm into wedding video development on a full time basis ... I don't need anymore STRESS.
Thanks again for your help.

Final Cut Pro 4 won't work on new Dual Core PowerMac

Hi, I was lucky enough to win Final Cut Pro 4 & DVD Studio Pro 2 in a competition nearly 2 years ago and was really looking forward to using them when I eventually could afford a more Powerful Mac.
My new Dual Core 2Ghz PowerMac arrived the other day and after installing then clicking on Final Cut Pro 4 I get the message-
Configuration error.
'This software requires certain hardware or software which is missing'
AGP Graphics Card.
Does this mean I have to buy another Graphics card?
I have a NVIDIA GeForce 6600 256MB SDRAM Graphics card with my Dual Core 2Ghz PowerMac.
Thanks.

No, you don't need to by another graphics card.
A quick search turned up these 2 links:
http://discussions.info.apple.com/.68be1a60
http://discussions.info.apple.com/.68bcdaab
You will find your answer in those 2 threads.

Anyone using a PowerMac Dual Core?

I just purchased the FCS and love it...however am finding my rig a bit out-dated. I currently use my PowerMac Dual G4 for my editing setup. I was noticing that you can get a Dual Core 2ghz G5 on Amazon for about $1800 new (after $200 rebate). Figuring that I could use that saved money for a couple gigs of RAM, does anyone have reccomendations as far as perfomance goes? I know that the quad is the ultimate right now - but don't think I can swing $3000 (before the monitor) Any advice is appreciated.
Thanks!

The dual core will perform about 30% faster than your G5 iMac in Final Cut. Certain things will be identical to the iMac.
If you think this is significantly faster than the G4, then you have your answer.
Barefeats.com has some good Final Cut Pro benchmarks of the various new macs. If the iMovie benchmarks posted there are any measure, once a universal version of FCP is available, the new Intel Duo machines will rock at least as fast as the best dual core G5's.
I personally would wait for Intel-based quad workstations, or get an iMac Duo if you need something quickly. Apple will be doing all they can over the next 2 years to optimize their code for the Intel chips in ways we've never seen before. I doubt that G5 acceleration will be a high priority for the company and the GPU's on the new Duos out-power the wimpy graphics chips in the Dual G5's. Just my opinion.

Refurbished 13.3-inch MacBook Air 1.8GHz dual-core Intel Core i5 Originally released June 2012 13.3-inch (diagonal) LED-backlit glossy widescreen display, 1440-by-900 resolution 4GB memory 256GB flash storage 720p FaceTime HD camera Intel HD Graphics 4

Is $1019 a good price?

Can you tell me why you don't think its a good buy? Someone bought it that must have thought it was a good buy? You?!!!
I had a macbook pro, spilled an entire latte on it. Cannot afford to drop another 1500 on a new one. I understand the air is a great machine. And for someone that is hard on equipment (aside from liquid!) with no moving parts its a better option. This one is priced at $929 - good?
Refurbished 13.3-inch MacBook Air 1.3GHz dual-core Intel Core i5
Originally released June 2013
13.3-inch (diagonal) LED-backlit glossy widescreen display, 1440-by-900 resolution
4GB memory
128GB flash storage
720p FaceTime HD camera
Intel HD Graphics 5000

PowerMac G5 dual core resolution

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for