PR commitment becomes zero while PO is in hold in EHP4

In ECC6 while PO was in hold mode PR value was not reduced.  But in EHP4 upgradation PR value/ commitment reduced while PO is in Hold.  So the budget is being available to user to create another PR and while going to save the old PO system asked for budget if available budget is less than PO value for which PR already created / linked.
Plz help to stop this PR commitment reduction while PO is in Hold.
Thanx
P K Sahoo

Hi Jurgen,
Yes I am working in a public sector.  The note - 1071578 was already suggested by SAP OSS support team and advised us to run T code-RKANBU01 after that.  The same has been applied but no result is comming up.  Further they have suggested for note 1616873, but the same was not compatable our EHP4, so it has informed to SAP OSS team.
Plz suggest if any other way is open for it.
Thanx.
Sahoo

Similar Messages

  • Value of Manual Pricing Condition is becoming zero while saving.

    My clientu2019s pricing calculation requirement is  complex. Here I am mentioning :-
    We have one pricing condition type YPR4 which is header as well as item condition. Value will come only from condition record . So, we maintained access sequence  in the configuration. Beside this we maintained u2018Manual entries u2018 in the configuration as u2018Not possible to process manuallyu2019. Condition record for this pricing condition type  we maintain for line items.
    We have another  pricing condition type Y255 which is also  Item condition as well as header condition. For this pricing condition  value ( header level) can come from condition records  if record exist , or , if condition record is not there or if user wants, user  can  enter value  in header level of the sales order. For getting this functionality  we maintained access sequence and u2018Manual Entryu2019 in the condition type configuration we have maintained as u2018No Limitationu2019.
    In the line item level Y255 will come only if YPR4 is there for that item. The total value of the Y255 in the header will need to be distributed in the line items accordingly as per existence of YPR4 in the line item.
    Issue:
    Now the issue is that, when  there no condition record for Y255 and when  we are entering the value of Y255 manually in the header, the value of Y255 is becoming zero  when we are moving from one screen to another screen in the same sales order , or when we are saving the sales order..
    Can anybody suggest what we need to do so that manually entered value of   Y255 remains in the sales order after moving to another screen or after saving the sales order ?

    Hi ,
    Please check the pricing routines funcationality which is assigned to both condition types.check the requirement and alt.cal. type routines of Y225 condition , on what basis condition record is updating manully entry as well as picking value from condition  records.

  • Target Cost in the settled process order become zero after cost deletion

    Dear all,
    User has standard cost estimates created in Jan 2010 that valid until the end of 2010 for every material in the system.  user created a process order in April 2010. Target cost of the order was created based on the standard cost estimate and recipes as well as order qty.    The order was also confirmed and settled in April 2010 without problem. 
    However, after I deleted all old costing estimates before I did a costing run for all materials in May 2010, the old order was resettled and all Target cost is removed from the order.  I guess system try to look at April costing estimate but it is not there since it was deleted before I created the new costing estimate in May.  Therefore, all varainces are throwed into remaining variances since the target cost become zero.
    Other than mark the settled order for deletion or keep all old costing estimates,  I am just wondering is anyway in the configuration to prevent the system to recaculate the target cost again for the settlement so I can avoid the problem happens?
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    Target costs are only calculated after goods movements have occured on the order, the Target Costs are then calculated during the Variance calculation.
    Target costs will only be calculated after the first goods receipt has been posted to the order. Also you have to ensure that the information to calculate target costs exists on the system in particular in OKV6.
    This estimation is based on the customizing for the Target cost version in transaction OKV6 as in turn will the "real" calculation of the Target costs via the variance calculation.
    So in OKV6 the Target cost will be based on preliminary costing on the order, an alternative cost estimate or the current standard cost estimate. Importantly if the choosen option is not fulfilled e.g. no current standard cost estimate, the target costs will not be predicted or calculated.
    regards
    Waman

  • Moving average price has become Zero

    Hi,
    Can you please help us , if you have any ...this kind of situation in your projects.
    Scenerio:
    We are using Workflow mechanism for creation material in Master data client
    01. After creation of Material, it will go for approval (to six departments in SAP Itself ) and after their approvals,it will be moved to "Book of Records"( to Transactional client)
    02.If the requester is submit the Material for approvals, it will create IDOC and will be moved to "Book of Records"( to Transactional client).
    03.If any error is there in the Material views, IDOC will be failed in Outbond system( Transactional client)
    in this case.We use BD10 to move the changes manually.
    Problem is,
    01.We moved manually 10 materials on 29/10/2008 through BD10 to Transactional client .in this case, we observed that, the moving average price(VERPR) ,Commercial price 2 (BWPH1),and Moving average price (if the price control is S) (SALKV) has become Zero.
    Why ?
    Why this 3 fields become Zero ?
    Is there any link between these fields and How ?
    Note: Price control "S" is maintained to the above all the materials.
    Can any body help us to find out the reason ?
    *What is the solution to find the Moving average price now and to update as on date ?
    Is there any field , we can see the Moving average price in backend ?*
    Your help will be highly appreciated.

    Thanks for your answers, But..
    There is a problem that we are supporting to China and they have a local ledger and they will calculate the actual costing based on tha moving price.Now these 10 Materials are Finished goods and are available in 30 plants each.
    Taking the MAP from the each plant and calucating it ... is very problem and headache Job .
    My question is ....
    How it got deleted and why ?
    Is there any relation between these three fileds ?
    Easiest way of collecting the MAP ?
    Any thought  will get the appreciation..
    Thanks
    Raju

  • Moving average price  has become Zero in Material Master

    Hi,
    Can you please help us , if you have any ...this kind of situation in your projects.
    Scenerio:
    We are using Workflow mechanism for creation material in Master data client
    01. After creation of Material, it will go for approval (to six departments in SAP Itself ) and after their approvals,it will be moved to "Book of Records"( to Transactional client)
    02.If the requester is submit the Material for approvals, it will create IDOC and will be moved to "Book of Records"( to Transactional client).
    03.If any error is there in the Material views, IDOC will be failed in Outbond system( Transactional client)
    in this case.We use BD10 to move the changes manually.
    Problem is,
    01.We moved manually 10 materials on 29/10/2008 through BD10 to Transactional client .in this case, we observed that, the moving average price(VERPR) ,Commercial price 2 (BWPH1),and Moving average price (if the price control is S) (SALKV) has become Zero.
    Why ?
    Why this 3 fields become Zero ?
    Is there any link between these fields and How ?
    Note: Price control "S" is maintained to the above all the materials.
    Can any body help us to find out the reason ?
    *What is the solution to find the Moving average price now and to update as on date ?
    Is there any field , we can see the Moving average price in backend ?*
    Your help will be highly appreciated.

    Normally when you create a new material, you need to provide the price manually for the first time. Now since you said your price control is "S". Otherwise your IDoc should have a price for the Standard price when it is "S" and Moving Average price when it is "V".
    It can be ZERO if you intend to create and release a std cost esatimte (For internally produced materials).

  • Net Value in sales order becomes zero after changing the employ responsible in Web UI

    Hi All,
    We are in CRM 7.0 with EHP1, when we change employ responsible in the sales order and save, Net value is becoming zeroes.
    This is effecting most of the transactions. There is no custom development, every thing is standard.
    Could any one suggest me this.
    Thanks.
    Best regards,
    Hari

    Hi Raj,
    Thanks you for your reply.
    Could you please let me know where I can see this combinations in configuration. Actually this is happening for standard transactions also.
    I checked customer pricing proc for that BP and Document Pricing proc for that T type. They are maintained for the specific salea area.
    Regards,
    Hari

  • Why does Firefox on my Windows 7 PC hang (become unresponsive) while it waits for most pages to load or run scripts?

    Firefox hangs (becomes unresponsive) when accessing many sites including Gmail. Eventually, when hung, Firefox will throw up a window saying "WARNING: A script has become unresponsive" or, in the case of Gmail, the page itself will say "Some Gmail features have failed to load due to an internet connectivity problem."
    IE8 and Google Chrome are working normally. I've tried Firefox in safe mode, re-installing and even running Firefox portable from a USB thumb drive. Each time with the same result—Firefox hangs or becomes unresponsive while it waits for most pages to load or run scripts.
    #### PC Workstation Environment ####
    Firefox 13.0.1
    Windows 7
    Symantec Endpoint Protection 11.0.6200.754
    --

    Your problem sounds like the one that a co-worker and I started to have about the same time. Check your Symantec client management control log. You might see a line like the following.
    Date and Time Severity Level Action Test / Production Description API Class Rule Caller Process ID Caller Process Parameter User
    2012-07-30 10:48:09 AM 15 Block Production Unauthorized NT call rejected by protection driver. System Built-in rule 1608 FlashplayerPlu FuncID-B6H, R... None
    At first we thought that it was a Javascript problem until we noticed this log. The key words are 'Block' and 'FlashPlayerPlu'. This problem recently started for us, perhaps with a software push 1-2 weeks ago. Internet Explorer does not hang when accessing pages with Flash.
    The Flash page does eventually load after a long time. However, since the whole browser hangs for a while, for the most part having the Flash plugin enabled makes Firefox unusable if accessing pages with Flash.
    Disabling the Flash plugin solves the hanging problem, but I do not know what is causing the problem, nor do I know when a combination of Windows 7, Flash, and Symantec will work. Your later version of Symantec shows that we might have the problem for a while, but I do not know what customization CSC did with Symantec. My coworker did run a complete virus scan, uncovering nothing. Another co-worker is running Windows XP. She does not have the problem, but I do not know what other versions of software she is running.
    Symantec Endpoint Protection version 11.0.6100.645
    Flash version 11.3.300.268
    Firefox version 14.0.1
    Windows 7 32-bit service pack 1

  • Actual quantity in service tab page becoming zero after updation

    Dear friends,
    We updated validity start date, end date in header and the field "form.val.2" in service tab page in item details of a service line item(item category D) in a Purchase order using the function module 'BAPI_PO_CHANGE'. After updation we observed the actual quantity (which denotes the total GR qty) becoming zero, making the PO completely open and allowing creation of service entry sheet for full quantity. This happend for so many POs. Now we want to correct the actual quantity. But as it is in display mode it now become difficult to change the actual quantity through any function module.
    Seeking for a genuine solution about how to correct the actual quantity.
    Regds
    Amitava

    hi
    check this sap note 938498 BAPI_PO_CHANGE: Reference update for a service item

  • Confirmed quantity becomes zero in process order

    What scenario did the confirmed quantity becomes 0 (zero) even though it has value upon the creation of the process order.
    You can see the confirmed quantity on the material list of the process order. The RESB table for the component becomes zero. But how it was become zero was the very big question.
    Thanks

    please run CORT, put your oder number and have a look WHO and WHEN confirmed zero
    also rum MB23 for your reservation, goto header and get the details

  • Arp entries becoming zero

    Hi,
    We have Sun 1280 servers running in our lab. We observe that sometime arp entries for some interfaces become zero suddenly.
    Here is the warning we observe in /var/adm/messages :-
    09:53:50 ca-a ip: [ID 903730 kern.warning] WARNING: IP: Hardware address '00:00:00:00:00:00' trying to be our address 024.094.103.069!
    14:32:17 ca-a ip: [ID 903730 kern.warning] WARNING: IP: Hardware address '08:00:20:ad:37:18' trying to be our address 024.094.103.068!
    Any help ?
    Thanks
    Akhil Jain

    Hello,
    the default ARP timeout on the MSFC is 14400 seconds, or 4 hours. The CAM (MAC address table) default timeout is 300 seconds.
    You actually might want to set the CAM agingtime to 4 hours as well, in order to avoid possible IP unicast traffic flooding...
    HTH,
    GP

  • Mass Contract Update - Item price become zero after Tax Code change

    HI Guru,
    I have issue on the contract net price which become zero after change in Tax code of item.
    Took the opportunity to update contracts to reflect the changing VAT code (from V0 to V1 for some items) from the Trx code: MEMASSCONTRACT. However, having run the transactions (ME33K) above the contracts are now displaying zero prices on the Item Overview.  The conditions are all correct (PB00) and the follow on purchase orders seem to be picking up the correct prices but we need to resolve the issue of zero prices on the item overview. 
    Please help me in this why it is happening like this? & what is the solution for it.
    Thanks in advance
    Praveen Katageri

    Hi,
    If pricing picking , just check  validity period ( Valid from & Valid to) in  condition of the  Info record.Also check any scale is used & price active or not in condition of Info record.
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Condition Base value becomes Zero

    Hi all,
    we created one routine to restrict usage of some condition types for Purchase  Order . These are manual condition types .
    Created one Rotuine in VOFM --Pricing.Wrote code in FORM KOBED_904 perform.Assigned routine in the M/08 Tcode for those condition types and in routine logic restricting condition types based on sy-subrc value.
    when i enter another manual condition type in header for which the routine is not assigned the condition base value of the condition type to which the routine as assigned becomes zero. hence the condition value also becomes zero.
    if i enters same in item level it is working fine.
    Regards,
    Ajay

    Hi,
    If u didnt assign routine also please check the sy subrc inside the routine and come  out.
    Regards,
    Nandha

  • Reduce PO commitment to Zero

    Hi,
    We Have limit PO with Multiple account assignment in SRM.
    The issue with commitment distribution for all the account assignment. when i post service entry sheet the value is posting for only first one cost centre/Order but not all.
    So in the purchase order for the remaining account assignment commitment remain left.
    We have implemented SAP Note 1165524, Now it is working fine for New PO's in SRM.
    But commitment for old Purchase order is still left, please help to reduce commitment to zero.
    Reagrds,
    JM

    Resolved

  • Making existing frequency become zero frequency

    Hye. Help me, I got a probem on making the existing frequency from read from measurement data become zero. Is that possible?
    Because the data should have 0Hz of its frequency. For now it have around 0.05Hz, so i want it to become 0. I has attach my snippet here. Thanks.
    Best regards,
    Fatin.

    I recommend a simple software debounce.  it has been very effective in the past.
    any equipment that vibrates and product spurious edges on a tach or encoder.
    see attached.  it is a modified version of one from NI  set n= 5 0r 10 for your case and see how it works
    Stu McFarlane
    Viewpoint Systems, Inc.
    Attachments:
    debounce.png ‏21 KB

  • IC elimination : closing balance become zero

    Hi BPC masters,
    I currently have an issue with the Intercompany Elimination (automatic adjustment) :
    When I run an IC elimination for 2014.12, all my data in the closing balance become zero. I do not know if the "force closing" in the business rule is related but I did not flag anything (see below).
    Even worse, we tried it first in DEV where this issue did not appear but in QUAL, it just started.
    As far as I know by reading forums, here are the following information :
    I have the flow type OPENING and CLOSING.
    The Destination audit in the business rule is IC. Nothing else was added.
    The method-based multiplier is simple (see below).
    Audittrail for IC is set as DATASOURCE_TYPE = A, IS_CONSO = Y and IS_TRANS = Y.
    Audittrail for Input is set as DATESOURCE_TYPE = I, IS_CONSO = Y, IS_TRANS = Y, IC_ORIGINE = Y and COPY_OPENING = Y.
    My logic script is the basic one with the currency conversion and consolidation (see below).
    So, is there anything wrong with my settings ? Is there any other information that you require to find a solution ? What can I do to avoid the closing balance to become zero ?
    Thank you in advance,
    Dat

    Hi,
    Please check Note No. : [1171183|https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1odSZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=1171183] and run the query mentioned in the Note.
    If the query has result, you need to log a support ticket to SAP in order to get the issue investigated.
    Regards,
    Jitin
    SAP Business One Forum Team

Maybe you are looking for