PR Contract PO not reducing PR commitment amount

Hello,
When we follow best business practices, the PO doesn’t reduce the commitment amount of the PR line item because the link between the PR and PO appears to be missing. We now have a large dollar amount of outstanding contract related PR commitments spanning several fiscal years. Is there a configuration or business process that we missed?
I am the CO person and an issue was recently brought to my attention when a business owner ran standard commitment reports. The business owner found the report was doubling the commitment amounts because the full dollar amount of the purchase request line item and the related purchase order line item were both displayed. Apparently, the PO wasn’t reducing the PR amount. This only seems to be happening with service contract related PR and POs.
The PR line item is created (transaction ME51N and ME52N) with doc type NB and then the contract is referenced to it (ME31K and ME32K). The PO is then created by adopting the contract number (ME33K). Both the PR and the PO are now linked to the contract. We have our commitments activated (OKKP) up to FY 9999 and the PR has been flagged as ‘Affects commitments’ (field XOBLR in table EBAN). As far as I’ve been able to find out, we have been following best business practices when creating our PR and POs when a contract exists.
I appologize if this question should be in the CO or FM area.
Thank you for any replies,

Do you create the PO manually in ME21N and Link the Contract during creation process?
In that process, you are losing the link between the PO and the PR.   Because in the System, your PR although linked to the Contract , has no Followup PO linked to it.   The PO is only linked to the Contract.
The correct Practice would be :
1- Contract Created.
2- PR Created   with the Contract in source assignment (either assigned Manually or via MRP -source list ) .
3- PO created w.r.t The PR . either in ME21N or ME59N ( This   would ensure that your PO is now linked to Both the PR and The Contract and the issue you are facing would no longer arise) .

Similar Messages

Sale order commitment amount not getting reduced

Dear Experts
Once the Sale order is created the SO committment amount gets updated in reports (commitment Vs Actual report) with"Forecast of Revenue" and Amount type 0100 (Original).
But after creation of Billing document (actuals) the same 'Forecast of Revenue' (commitment amount ) is not getting reduced with Amount type (0200). FM document is generated at the time of Billing document generation and the same is showing in reports from Invoice side.
The same cycle is happening in MM i.e, once PR/PO commitment will get reduced after actuals were happened.
Ex:
Ref doc     Item     Val.type text                       Amt type     Payment bdgt
100000     10     Forecast of Revenue     0100          100
20000     2     Invoices                          0100          100
Why SO commitment is not getting reduced in SD module?. Because of this reports are showing wrong.
Kindly suggest.
Thanks in advance
Rao

Dear Mar
Thanks for the support and tried all the possible ways but not able to find out the reaon:
a. FM Accounts assignments (CI, FC,Fund and BP) are same both Sale order and Billing documents.
b. There is no exits are activated.
c. It is happening all the sale orders and the reduction is completly missing.
d. For your reference please find the below commitment and Actuals report (FMRP_RFFMTO10X ).
Ref doc       Val.type text                    Amount type      CI              FC                Amount
100107       Forecast of Revenue              0100           100           ABC                 100
256487       Invoices                                   0100           100           ABC                 100
    Because of this when we check budget report the consumed amount is showing Rs. 200/-
e. And also we don't have any PGI concept, only after Sale order creation direct billing document will be generated.
Kindly suggest is there any configuration missing issue or something else.
Regarads
Rao

The bill document printed from a contract is not displaying the amount at i

When we execute the print layout form a bill document from a contract is not displaying the amount at item level however the total amount of the document is correctly displayed in the button of the document.
Thank you and best regards.

Hi Alberto
please check the field which has been mapped in the SAP Script and the Smart form.
it must be the header amount field. you can replace it with the VBAP_NEtWR or similar fields like kzw1 if you have mapped the sub totla sot get the amount at item levels
thanks
akasha

Down payment reducing the commitment with reference to PO

Dear All,
The budget is 1500 USD. The PO was created with an amount of 1000 USD and kept down payment as 250 USD . So the balance is 500 USD. While making down payment through ME2DP, system will bring FM objects from PO against advance line item. After this step, the commitment will reduce from 1000 USD to 750 USD. If any user enters expenditure directly in FI by using the same budget code, system will allow for the remaining amount 750 USD. When we are doing service entry sheet against this PO for full amount 1000 USD then system is giving error message as budget exceeded by 250 USD. This is due to commitment reduced while making down payment. We used the derivation rule based on transaction type to overwrite the commitment but system is bringing commitment field value from PO at the time of posting.
Please give us the solution to avoid reducing the commitment while making down payment with reference to PO.
Update profile: 000101
Value Type: 61 (Statistical Update)
Regards,
Sree

Hi Sree,
You need to check or Configure Automatic clearing of Down Payments, please check the IMG setting:
Public Sector Management>Funds Management Government>Actual and Commitment Update/Integration>Integration>Configure Automatic Clearing of Down Payments/Down Payment Requests:
Activate check box "DP Clr" down payment clearing during a GR/IR
If this flag is set, the down payment is cleared automatically during the creation of the goods receipt (GR) or invoice receipt (IR), depending on your FM settings.
Regards
Javed

How to reduce the GR amount?

I have made the PO say for Qty1 for amount 1000 in FEB'09.
I made the GR for Qty 1 & amount 1000 in Feb'09
Vendor given us the invoice reduce price for amount 500..Accounts dept book the IR & release the check. then period has been rolled off. Now how can we make the GR amount to 500?
Pl advice..

Quantity variances occur if the vendor:
Sends a partial invoice for one or more deliveries
In this case, the system expects to receive more invoices (or return deliveries).
Sends an invoice for a delivery that the goods receipt has not yet been posted for.
In this case, the system expects further goods receipts (or credit memos).
Special circumstances exist for goods-receipt based invoice verification:
If goods-receipt based Invoice Verification has been defined for an order item and the goods receipt has not yet been posted, the system does not allow you to post the invoice.
If goods-receipt based invoice verification has been defined for a purchase order item, a goods receipt has been posted, and an invoice is now entered for a larger quantity, the standard system is configured to display a warning message. This enables you to post a quantity larger than that received at the time of invoice receipt even when goods-receipt based invoice verification is active

Table size not reducing after delete

The table size in dba_segments is not reducing after we delete the data from the table. How can i regain the space after deleting the data from a table.
Regards,
Natesh

I think when you do DELETE it removes the data but
it's not releasing any used space and it's still
marked as used space. I think reorganizing would help
to compress and pack all block and relase any unused
space in blocks. Why do you think that? Deleting data will create space that can be reused by subsequent insert/ update operations. It is not going to release space back to the tablespace to make it available for inserts into other tables in the tablespace, but that's not generally an issue unless you are permanently decreasing the size of a table, which is pretty rare.
Would you also please explain about different about
LOB and LONG ? or point me to any link which explain
baout it.From the Oracle Concepts manual's section on the LONG data type
"Note:
Do not create tables with LONG columns. Use LOB columns (CLOB, NCLOB) instead. LONG columns are supported only for backward compatibility.
Oracle also recommends that you convert existing LONG columns to LOB columns. LOB columns are subject to far fewer restrictions than LONG columns. Further, LOB functionality is enhanced in every release, whereas LONG functionality has been static for several releases."
LONG was a very badly implemented solution to storing large amounts of data. LOBs are a much, much better designed solution-- you should always be using LOBs.
Justin

How to Reduce BED Payable amount

Dear All,,
Kindly tel how to reduce BED Payble amount.
But I tried in J1IH AND J1IS but i am not able to reduce BED Paybale amount.And i passed Jv for that Gl account it only decrease Gl balance but not Decrease J2IUN balance.
Kindly suggest me how to come out of this
Thanks and Regards
Girish.

Dear,
In J2IU you have to utilize BED payable against the BED recoverable. Then net amount is paid in following steps,
Step 1. FB50, create document for payment of excise duty.
Step 2. Create TR6 challan through J1IH using above generated document number.
Regards,
Chintan Joshi.

My daughter wants to remove herself from our plan and use a different cell provider. However, our contract is not yet up, what is the penalty for removing her early?

My daughter wants to remove herself from our plan and use a different cell provider. However, our contract is not yet up, what is the penalty for removing her early?

For contacts started before November 14, 2014, the ETF is $350 minus $10 per month of the contract term completed for smartphones. For other ddv6,it is $175 minus $5 per month of the contract term completed. You will need to call customer service at 1-800-922-0204 or *611 to find out the ETF amount for contracts started on and after November 14, 2014.

Material not reduced

Dear all,
The BOM for a certain material do not reduce the raw material even when its receipted. This has been happening for a while now.
Please advice how do I fix this or is there any other way to resolve this?
Thanks

I think the issue is with my planning strategy.
Whenever I receipt material in SAP, it the system is not reduced, it still shows the same amount of material.
if item A is 90 and I receipt it, it will show 90 still even after receioted.
Hope this is clear if not please advice

CPF contribution is not deducting on AWS amount for retried employee.

Hi,
Issue reported: - CPF contribution is not deducting on AWS amount for retried employee.
fyi -even though employee is separated his bonus will be paid in month of December
I have checked the AWS wage type, the culmination class 3 is checked, as it is an addition wage type. And its 0185 and 0186 is not delimited also.
How can I found out the root cause?
Regards
Thomas
Edited by: Thomas Padiyara on Dec 9, 2010 2:49 AM

Patch updates issue.

Quota arrangement - winning contract is not auto assign in SC

My Problem: Winning contract is not auto assign to Shopping cart
I created a Quota Arrangement (QA). It contains 2
contracts, for example in line item 1, contain Contract with Supplier
'A', with target percentage of 60%. In line item 2, contain Contract with
Supplier 'B', with target percentage of 40%. I did not specify any quotabase quantity.
For your info, the contract for Supplier 'A" is a Purchasing Contract,
with target value of 80 (currency Malaysian Ringgit). Contract for
Supplier 'B' has target value of 20 (currency Malaysian Ringgit). When Icreate a Shopping Cart, with quantity 5 (each-EA) and price per unit is
2
(Malaysian Ringgit), total is MYR10. When I go to Source of Supply tab,
the system showed 2 suppliers from the 2 contracts. It did not
automatically assigned to the winning contract. We still have to choose
which contract to be assigned. I created another SC after that until theContract exceeded quantity, but the system does not proposed winning
contract automatically. Please help.
Cheers
AIN

yes, the contract have company code

Planned ind.requirement is not reduced during processing of the goods issue

Hello to all,
I am facing a problem.
We are using make to stock production with strategy 10 (LSF).
On 1.12.2006 the ind.requirement (LSF) is entered for week 4.2007 (I see that from schedule line history) for the material A.
In the system at that time there were a sales order which needed that material A in exact quantity the LSF was. The GI of the delivery were on 13.01.2007.
The LSF still exist in the system and it can be seen in MD04.
Before running every MRP, a planning scenario is being created and run. From MS04 I can see that the LSF exists since then in all scenarios except from 3.
The schedule line history of the LSF has only its creation (1.12.2006).
Can you please explain to me the following:
1. why in the first place the LSF did not reduce after the GI of delivery?
2. the LSF does not exist in olny 3 scenarios. how it could disappear (delete) and appear (create) again without history displays that changes?
3. If I delete the LSF I think I will not have a problem. Correct?
Thank you in advance for your help.
IX

Hi Ismini,
For the first question, there could be several reasons, like for example, 13.1 is not week 4. So if the consumption parameters did not allow forward for at least around 7-10 days (to get to the date of the first day in week 4), then consumtion didn't take place. Another reason could be that you defined planning strategy 10 for the material AFTER the sales order was already created.
Point 2: I really don't know he details of these LTP scenarios that you mention.
Point 3: if it really is from 2007 I think that you can delete the PIR without fear.
Regards,
Mario

Table space not reduce after delete in oracle 11G

Hi Team,
I have a DB 11.1.0.7 on unix.
I have execute delete tables on tablespace, but this not reduce.
Thanks

935299 wrote:
What segment space management type is defined for the tablespace in question?
MANUAL
Then you should check out the documentation some more.
But even if you shrink the table segement what is that going to do for the data file size?
I don't undertand you.
ThanksYour thread is titled "Table space not reduce after delete in oracle 11G" which implies to me that you are interested in reducing the size of a tablespace (which really means reducing the size of the underlying datafile(s)).
So, if you shrink the size of the sys.aud$ table, will that cause the datafile(s) to become smaller? Will it accomplish your goal? What else, if anything, needs to happen?

Table space not reduce after delete in oracle 10g

Hi..
Based on my system, i have found that my oracle table space did not reduce after the deletion query. Why ?.. Could somebody help me. As your info, I am using oracle 10g.
Thank you,
Baharin

After Delete the table space will not be set free. high water mark will not be reset. to regain the space you need to recognize the objects from which you deleted the data. This can be done in many ways.
1) Move the objects.
Alter table temp move --> optionally tablespace clause can be used. After this you need to rebuild table indexes.
2) With 10g table can be shrinked or reorganize to free the space.
alter table mytable enable row movement;
alter table mytable shrink space;
3) Export/Import
export the objects and drop and recreate with import.

Contract item not appearing in Shopping cart sourcing

Hi Team,
I created a contract from External Catalog that has Description and Product Category, but no product ID for the item selected.
Now, I created a Shopping cart from the same catalog. I need this Contract to appear in the Sourcing area of the shopping cart, but since there is no product Id, the contract is not appearing.
How can I resolve this. This works perfect if I create a Contract for item with Product ID.
Please help.

Hi,
In your case, Vendor Product Number (Supplier Parts Number) is required.
Please make sure that Vendor Product Number is in catalog and contract.
Regards,
Masa

PR Contract PO not reducing PR commitment amount

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for