PR eliminated not return budget for WBS

Hello Guys.
PR even with "deleted" status not return budget for WBS.
In tcode CJ20N the Purchase Requisition has been marked for deletion. The committed amount of the budget not returned to WBS element.
The personnel has some way to find out where did the budgeted value of this eliminated PR?
Have performed CJEN and nothing happened.
Please I need a help in this matter.
Thank you very much
Vitti

Please check the below specified link, which is very much similar to u r requirement
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46C/helpdata/EN/fd/45add69d6411d189b60000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
Regards
Suresh

Similar Messages

Content scope document library does not return result for non farm administrator

Hi
I have a situation where I had to go with a unique permission applied subsite to store 1000 documents in the document library. This site has a set of 50 users. I was able to create content scope and library path for search. It returns results for me(creator/owner/administrator)
however if I add other users as contributor or full permission, even after full crawling it does not return result for others.
I saw some article that security broken site wont be indexed normal way and to include and I did that as well but no result for other users. I always get result.
Please suggest if there are any specific security permissions that I need to include, so the document library target search will return result for others.
Thanks
Shri

Hi Shri,
For administrator search results, it looks like the documents could be crawled and searched.
For other users you grant full control permission on subsite with unique permission where you store 1000 dcouments in document library, please make sure these 50 users have access permission(at least view permission) on documents from the
library, then test again.
Also test if users search on search center site without search scope, see if it's scope issue or search web part issue.
If above doesn't work, please check ULS log for related useful information around the time when users search the documents, there should be more info to verify if issue is related to unique permision.
Thanks,
Daniel Yang
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

CQWP does not return result for a specific query when filtering on a managed metadata field.

Hi,
We are facing a serious production issue. We've search the web extensively but to no avail.
Problem:
CQWP does not return result for a specific query when filtering on a managed metadata field.
ULS log:
The Uls logs provides 3 different messages that I could relate to every time the query is executed. The last item(level Medium) is displayed 14 times. For readability I've moved the ULS logs to the bottom of this question.
Query:
The query is as follows:
(I've translated this from dutch so pardon any typo's)
Query: (top selection) Display items from all sites in the site collection
ListType: Documentlibrary
Contenttype:
Items from this group:Custom Document Contenttypes
Items from this content type: Verklaring
Filter: Soort is equal to X
extra info: the field soort (Type) is a managed metadata field that was assigned the value X
Managed Metadata Structure:
-managed metadata service
-Contoso
    -Enterprise Taxonomy (term set)
      -Document (term)
        -Verklaring (term)
          -Soort (term)
            -x (term)
EXTRA INFO:
When I modify the filter to filter on Title the CQWP DOES return the correct document!
When I modify the query settings to search a specific library the CWQP also does return the correct document! (In this case I am filtering on a managed metadata field).
QUESTION:
Why doesn't the CQWP return the document when filtering on a managed metadata field over the entire site collection.
Why does the CQWP return the document when filtering on a managed metadata field over a single library.
(The type of information the CQWP should return (Soort:x) is stored in a dozen document libraries!)
Here are the ULS logs.
Product: Web Content Management
Category Publishing
Level: Monitorable:
CrossListQueryCache::GetSiteData() caught exception (Microsoft.SharePoint.SPException: Kan deze actie niet voltooien. Probeer het opnieuw. ---> System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException (0x80004005): Kan deze actie niet voltooien. Probeer
het opnieuw.     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequestInternalClass.CrossListQuery(String bstrUrl, String bstrXmlWebs, String bstrXmlLists, String bstrXmlQuery, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter pCallback, Object& pvarColumns)
bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequest.CrossListQuery(String bstrUrl, String bstrXmlWebs, String bstrXmlLists, String bstrXmlQuery, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter pCallback, Object& pvarColumns)     --- Einde van intern uitzonderingsstackpad
---     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.SPGlobal.HandleComException(COMException comEx)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequest.CrossListQuery(String bstrUrl, String bstrXmlWebs, String bstrXmlLists, String bstrXmlQuery,
ISP2DSafeArrayWriter pCallback, Object& pvarColumns)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.SPWeb.GetSiteData(SPSiteDataQuery query)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.CachedArea.GetSiteData(SPWeb web, SPSiteDataQuery
siteDataQuery, Boolean useSpQueryOnList)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.CachedArea.GetCrossListQueryResults(SPSiteDataQuery query, SPWeb currentContext, Boolean onlyPopulateCache, Boolean useSpQueryOnList, Int32 lcid)
bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.CrossListQueryCache.GetSiteDataResults(CachedArea cachedArea, SPWeb web, SPSiteDataQuery query, Boolean useSpQueryOnList)) for query: '<ViewFields><FieldRef ID="{fa564e0f-0c70-4ab9-b863-0177e6ddd247}"
Nullable="True" Type="Text"/><FieldRef ID="{94f89715-e097-4e8b-ba79-ea02aa8b7adb}" Nullable="True" Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef ID="{1d22ea11-1e32-424e-89ab-9fedbadb6ce1}" Nullable="True"
Type="Counter"/><FieldRef ID="{28cf69c5-fa48-462a-b5cd-27b6f9d2bd5f}" Nullable="True" Type="DateTime"/><FieldRef ID="{1df5e554-ec7e-46a6-901d-d85a3881cb18}" Nullable="True" Type="User"/><FieldRef
ID="{d31655d1-1d5b-4511-95a1-7a09e9b75bf2}" Nullable="True" Type="User"/><FieldRef ID="{8c06beca-0777-48f7-91c7-6da68bc07b69}" Nullable="True" Type="DateTime"/><FieldRef ID="{30bb605f-5bae-48fe-b4e3-1f81d9772af9}"
Nullable="True" Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef ID="{ba3c27ee-4791-4867-8821-ff99000bac98}" Nullable="True" Type="Text"/><FieldRef ID="{c5c4b81c-f1d9-4b43-a6a2-090df32ebb68}" Nullable="True"
Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef ID="{8fca95c0-9b7d-456f-8dae-b41ee2728b85}" Nullable="True" Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef ID="{39360f11-34cf-4356-9945-25c44e68dade}" Nullable="True" Type="Text"/><FieldRef
ID="{543bc2cf-1f30-488e-8f25-6fe3b689d9ac}" Nullable="True" Type="Image"/><FieldRef ID="{43bdd51b-3c5b-4e78-90a8-fb2087f71e70}" Nullable="True" Type="Number"/><FieldRef ID="{9da97a8a-1da5-4a77-98d3-4bc10456e700}"
Nullable="True" Type="Note"/><FieldRef ID="{aea3cd20-8da0-4cb7-803b-5a33079a0e4d}" Nullable="True" Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef Name="ScopeId" /><FieldRef Name="_Level" /><FieldRef
Name="UniqueId" /><ListProperty Name="DraftVersionVisibility" /></ViewFields><Lists ServerTemplate="101"></Lists><Webs Scope="Recursive" /><RowLimit>45</RowLimit><Query><Where><And><BeginsWith><FieldRef
Name="ContentTypeId" Nullable="True" Type="ContentTypeId"/><Value Type="ContentTypeId">0x010100C5FEE83B67FA6445B0C14AE8B7761BB8011E</Value></BeginsWith><In><FieldRef ID="{aea3cd20-8da0-4cb7-803b-5a33079a0e4d}"
LookupId="TRUE"/><Values><Value Type="Counter">783</Value></Values></In></And></Where><OrderBy><FieldRef ID="{8c06beca-0777-48f7-91c7-6da68bc07b69}" Nullable="True"
Type="DateTime" Ascending="FALSE"/></OrderBy></Query>' at url: /. Titel webonderdeel: Inhoudsquery
Product: Web Content Management
Category Publishing
Level: Warning
Error occured while processing a Content Query Web Part. Performing the following query '<ViewFields><FieldRef ID="{fa564e0f-0c70-4ab9-b863-0177e6ddd247}" Nullable="True" Type="Text"/><FieldRef ID="{94f89715-e097-4e8b-ba79-ea02aa8b7adb}"
Nullable="True" Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef ID="{1d22ea11-1e32-424e-89ab-9fedbadb6ce1}" Nullable="True" Type="Counter"/><FieldRef ID="{28cf69c5-fa48-462a-b5cd-27b6f9d2bd5f}" Nullable="True"
Type="DateTime"/><FieldRef ID="{1df5e554-ec7e-46a6-901d-d85a3881cb18}" Nullable="True" Type="User"/><FieldRef ID="{d31655d1-1d5b-4511-95a1-7a09e9b75bf2}" Nullable="True" Type="User"/><FieldRef
ID="{8c06beca-0777-48f7-91c7-6da68bc07b69}" Nullable="True" Type="DateTime"/><FieldRef ID="{30bb605f-5bae-48fe-b4e3-1f81d9772af9}" Nullable="True" Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef ID="{ba3c27ee-4791-4867-8821-ff99000bac98}"
Nullable="True" Type="Text"/><FieldRef ID="{c5c4b81c-f1d9-4b43-a6a2-090df32ebb68}" Nullable="True" Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef ID="{8fca95c0-9b7d-456f-8dae-b41ee2728b85}" Nullable="True"
Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef ID="{39360f11-34cf-4356-9945-25c44e68dade}" Nullable="True" Type="Text"/><FieldRef ID="{543bc2cf-1f30-488e-8f25-6fe3b689d9ac}" Nullable="True" Type="Image"/><FieldRef
ID="{43bdd51b-3c5b-4e78-90a8-fb2087f71e70}" Nullable="True" Type="Number"/><FieldRef ID="{9da97a8a-1da5-4a77-98d3-4bc10456e700}" Nullable="True" Type="Note"/><FieldRef ID="{aea3cd20-8da0-4cb7-803b-5a33079a0e4d}"
Nullable="True" Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef Name="ScopeId" /><FieldRef Name="_Level" /><FieldRef Name="UniqueId" /><ListProperty Name="DraftVersionVisibility" /></ViewFields><Lists
ServerTemplate="101"></Lists><Webs Scope="Recursive" /><RowLimit>45</RowLimit><Query><Where><And><BeginsWith><FieldRef Name="ContentTypeId" Nullable="True" Type="ContentTypeId"/><Value
Type="ContentTypeId">0x010100C5FEE83B67FA6445B0C14AE8B7761BB8011E</Value></BeginsWith><In><FieldRef ID="{aea3cd20-8da0-4cb7-803b-5a33079a0e4d}" LookupId="TRUE"/><Values><Value Type="Counter">783</Value></Values></In></And></Where><OrderBy><FieldRef
ID="{8c06beca-0777-48f7-91c7-6da68bc07b69}" Nullable="True" Type="DateTime" Ascending="FALSE"/></OrderBy></Query>' generated the following error: Kan deze actie niet voltooien. Probeer het opnieuw.
at the following url: /. Titel webonderdeel: Inhoudsquery
Kan deze actie niet voltooien. Probeer het opnieuw. This is Dutch. It means something like: Cannot complete this action. Please try again.
Product: Web Content Management
Category Publishing
Level: Medium (this message is displayed 14 times)
ConsoleUtilies.GetContextualControlMode had no currentPage so the current SPWebPartManager mode cannot be retrieved.

Hi,
while digging through the logging (again) I found some extra logging regarding the same correlation id (see details below).
We have a fairly large term store (4000+ lines).
If somebody has a clue or tip that would greatly appreciated!
03-19-2014 13:49:51.87 w3wp.exe (0x2098) 0x23BC SharePoint Foundation Database fa42 Monitorable A large block of literal text was sent to sql. This can result in blocking in sql and excessive memory use on the front
end. Verify that no binary parameters are being passed as literals, and consider breaking up batches into smaller components. If this request is for a SharePoint list or list item, you may be able to resolve this by reducing the number of fields. 1971313a-6baa-49e9-bace-d024ce67f25c
03-19-2014 13:49:51.87 w3wp.exe (0x2098) 0x23BC SharePoint Foundation Database fa43 High Slow Query Duration: 127.1515 1971313a-6baa-49e9-bace-d024ce67f25c
03-19-2014 13:49:51.87 w3wp.exe (0x2098) 0x23BC SharePoint Foundation Database fa44 High Slow Query StackTrace-Managed:    bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Utilities.SqlSession.OnPostExecuteCommand(SqlCommand command,
SqlQueryData monitoringData)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Utilities.SqlSession.ExecuteReader(SqlCommand command, CommandBehavior behavior, SqlQueryData monitoringData, Boolean retryForDeadLock)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSqlClient.ExecuteQueryInternal(Boolean
retryfordeadlock)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSqlClient.ExecuteQuery(Boolean retryfordeadlock)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequestInternalClass.CrossListQuery(String bstrUrl, String bstrXmlWebs, String
bstrXmlLists, String bstrXmlQuery, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter pCallback, Object& pvarColumns)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequest.CrossListQuery(String bstrUrl, String bstrXmlWebs, String bstrXmlLists, String bstrXmlQuery, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter
pCallback, Object& pvarColumns)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.SPWeb.GetSiteData(SPSiteDataQuery query)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.CachedArea.GetSiteData(SPWeb web, SPSiteDataQuery siteDataQuery, Boolean
useSpQueryOnList)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.CachedArea.GetCrossListQueryResults(SPSiteDataQuery query, SPWeb currentContext, Boolean onlyPopulateCache, Boolean useSpQueryOnList, Int32 lcid)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.CrossListQueryCache.GetSiteDataResults(CachedArea
cachedArea, SPWeb web, SPSiteDataQuery query, Boolean useSpQueryOnList)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.CrossListQueryCache.GetSiteDataResults(CachedArea ca, Boolean useSpQueryOnList)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.CrossListQueryCache.GetSiteDataResults(SPSite
site, String webUrl, Boolean useSpQueryOnList)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.WebControls.ContentByQueryWebPart.IssueQuery()     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.WebControls.ContentByQueryWebPart.GetXPathNavigator(String
viewPath)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.DataFormWebPart.PrepareAndPerformTransform(Boolean bDeferExecuteTransform)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.DataFormWebPart.PerformSelect()
bij Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.DataFormWebPart.DataBind()     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.DataFormWebPart.EnsureDataBound()     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.DataFormWebPart.CreateChildControls()
bij System.Web.UI.Control.EnsureChildControls()     bij System.Web.UI.Control.PreRenderRecursiveInternal()     bij System.Web.UI.Control.PreRenderRecursiveInternal()     bij System.Web.UI.Control.PreRenderRecursiveInternal()
bij System.Web.UI.Control.PreRenderRecursiveInternal()     bij System.Web.UI.Control.PreRenderRecursiveInternal()     bij System.Web.UI.Control.PreRenderRecursiveInternal()     bij System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean
includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint)     bij System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequest(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint)     bij System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequest()
bij System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequest(HttpContext context)     bij ASP.BLANKWEBPARTPAGE_ASPX_1653093133.ProcessRequest(HttpContext context)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.TemplateRedirectionPage.ProcessRequest(HttpContext
context)     bij System.Web.HttpApplication.CallHandlerExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute()     bij System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously)
bij System.Web.HttpApplication.PipelineStepManager.ResumeSteps(Exception error)     bij System.Web.HttpApplication.BeginProcessRequestNotification(HttpContext context, AsyncCallback cb)     bij System.Web.HttpRuntime.ProcessRequestNotificationPrivate(IIS7WorkerRequest
wr, HttpContext context)     bij System.Web.Hosting.PipelineRuntime.ProcessRequestNotificationHelper(IntPtr managedHttpContext, IntPtr nativeRequestContext, IntPtr moduleData, Int32 flags)     bij System.Web.Hosting.PipelineRuntime.ProcessRequestNotification(IntPtr
managedHttpContext, IntPtr nativeRequestContext, IntPtr moduleData, Int32 flags)     bij System.Web.Hosting.PipelineRuntime.ProcessRequestNotificationHelper(IntPtr managedHttpContext, IntPtr nativeRequestContext, IntPtr moduleData, Int32
flags)     bij System.Web.Hosting.PipelineRuntime.ProcessRequestNotification(IntPtr managedHttpContext, IntPtr nativeRequestContext, IntPtr moduleData, Int32 flags) 1971313a-6baa-49e9-bace-d024ce67f25c

Bulk editor is not returning values for default properties

..even though the content nodes have a value for this property. CQ version is 5.5.
I need to export a report of all user generated content from /content/usergenerated/content/<sitename>/en. This is the root path.
The query parameter I have specified is "type:Rating". By default the "sling:resourceType" is selected. No other custom properties are specified in the interface.
The search returns the nodes of this type, but the results do not return a value for the "sling:resourceType" for these nodes.

It should work. Might be you do not have data. Is the results shown as zero records?

ALUI Gateway Not Returning Scripts for Subset of Users

We have a problem where the ALUI gateway is not returning some .NET scripts for a subset of users. We have the ALUI 6.5 portal and our using the .NET accelerator 3.1.
The situation is that this subset of users request one of our portal pages via https, which then reaches through our firewall to our remote server which is running the .NET portlet. The .NET page is served and returned to the users correctly and quickly, but this particular subset of users do not see the result rendered in their browsers for about 3 minutes. A view html source in the browser, as well as tools like Fiddler, show the page is indeed in the browser, but it is stuck trying to request some .NET scripts, and only displays the page when those requests timeout.
The .NET scripts that are problems are both WebResource.axd and ScriptResource.axd, which in some cases are in our .NET portlets because of the .NET framework itself, but in other cases they are there only because of the ALUI portal itself, when it munges the .NET portlet to handle multiple server forms and validators and such. These .axd scripts are gatewayed so that the client browser requests them through the ALUI gateway, which in turn requests them through our firewall to our remote server -- which always serves these scripts correctly and quickly according to the IIS logs. The problem seems to lie in the ALUI gateway, as it is receiving these scripts correctly and quickly, but it is not returning them to this subset of users. Instead the ALUI gateway seems to be processing for about 3 minutes, and eventually returns an html error page, which of course the client never sees since it is expecting javascript, but we can capture the error page via Fiddler and its just telling us there was a timeout -- the client browser just notes that there is a javascript error.
The really bizarre part is that this only happens for a subset of users, which amounts to about 20% of our users. There are 2 things that delineate these users that we have found so far. First, these users have email addresses that are 27 - 30 characters long, and the email address is our login id. Note that both shorter and longer email addresses are OK, so there is not some limit to email addresses like this might sound like at first. Secondly, these users have to be in a particular branch of our ldap store, which means they are replicated across to the portal in a particular group. We can move these "bad" users into another branch of our ldap store and once they are replicated to the portal then they work fine, and then if we move them back they return to not working. We cannot find any other difference in our ldap branches or in the corresponding ALUI groups, plus its only the ones in that particular branch with the email lengths in that very specific range.
The gatewayed requests for these scripts vary by user since the PTARGS in the gatewayed request include the integer userid, but that does not seem to matter because we can have a "good" user successfully request the script with a "bad" user's id, and we can have a "bad" user fail to successfully request the script with a "good" user's id. That seems to point to maybe the authentication cookie being the differentiating factor that determines whether or not a gatewayed request for one of these script files will succeed or fail. So far we have only seen the problem with these particular .net axd scripts, but that may simply be because we don't have many, if any, other scripts or resources that need to be gatewayed since we usually put resources on our imageserver -- these being different because .NET and/or the ALUI portal puts these references in there for us whether we like it or not. Long-term we can re-architect our .NET portlets to not get have these axd scripts, although as mentioned earlier, we also see the ALUI portal put these axd scripts in our portlets as part of their munging process -- so that is not in our control completely. We do need to test if this subset of users can successfully request other gatewayed resources or not -- this is actually the first time I thought of that test case, so all I can say right now is its axd scripts that we know are problems, but it may or may not be a bigger problem.
One last comment, as we appear to have found a work-around, but it does not make sense at all, and its not our preferred solution, so we still very much believe there is a problem elsewhere -- most likely in the ALUI gateway, but possibly somehow related to authentication that we do not understand. Our work-around that so far seems to work is to make our remote server be accessed via https instead of http -- which matches the way the client browsers call our portal (https). Again that first doesn't make sense, since this is only a problem for a small subset of users -- obviously calling our remote server via http works successfully for all other users, so its not just is a simple case that we must match protocols or it won't work. We also use http successfully for our calls to the remote server for portlets that are Java, although its possible that they don't have any gatewayed resources. But we also would just prefer to not use https for our internal calls in our own network as there is no need for the extra overhead -- and by the way our dev and qa environments do use http even for these .NET portlets and do not have the same problem. What's different in our production environment? The only things that should be different are that we have multiple portal servers and multiple remote servers that are load balanced (not sure that's the right term for how the remote servers are combined) -- and of course we have a firewall between them that does not exist in dev or qa.
So we would very much appreciate any thoughts on this, whether you've seen something like it before, or just have some additional insight into the gateway and/or authentication process that seems to be the issue.
Thanks, Paul Wilson

We've ran into this problem when using the Microsoft ReportViewer control. In our case, we found that the portal gateway malformed the urls containing webresource.axd, so the browser was unable to get the correct address to the files. Note that there are usually multiple links to the axd files, they return different resources depending on the query string they get.
To solve the problem, we ended up with a bit of a hack solution, but it works well. We extracted the resources we needed from the ReportViewer control's assembly using Reflector, and then published them on the image server. The next piece was to override the Render method of the page that hosted the control. In our custom version of Render, we parsed the html of the page, and replaced the contents of the src= elements with pt:images// links. These processed just fine in the portal's transformer, and our resources started showing up.
Our Render looks something like the following code sample. The "HACKReportViewerControlPortalImageGatewayFix" class has all of the code to do the parsing. In this case, it is specific to the report viewer, because it has some special considerations for parsing the urls. My bet if that your code will be quite custom as well. Therefore, I've not included this piece of code. The important piece below is the invocation of MyBase.Render, which tells the page to render all of it's contents. Once that method is done, all of the HTML for the page is in the writer. The ModifyImageTags method then parses the html, doing the necessary replacements. Finally, the modified html is written to the page's writer, so it can be output following the normal .net processes. Also note that when parsing for urls to replace, don't do all of them, just look for the ones containing axd.
(VB.NET)
Protected Overrides Sub Render(ByVal writer As System.Web.UI.HtmlTextWriter)
          Dim fixer As New HACKReportViewerControlPortalImageGatewayFix
          MyBase.Render(fixer.GetWriter)
          writer.Write(fixer.ModifyImageTags())
End Sub
This works great for images. However, if you are dealing with javascripts, I'm not sure if this will work for you - as some .NET controls send different scripts depending on the browser. For example, in IE, you get more buttons on the toolbar for the ReportViewer, so you get more javascript too. When using FF, you get less buttons, and less script. We didn't have a problem with the scripts, so we haven't needed to solve this one.
As for timing, this type of solution doesn't take much to put together. You are really just doing some string parsing and replacements. If you are a regex ninja, it's probably even easier. We had our solution working in a day or two.
An added benefit to this solution is that you are putting less bytes through the portal's gateway, and sending that traffic to the image server instead.

Why between for date is not returning data for this query ?

Hello,
i have a table with this structure and i am writing this query for fetching some rows based on some condition , but this query is not returning any data . Can you please tell why ?
ID     DT
003     11/8/2011
002     10/8/2011
001     9/8/2011
And the query is :
SELECT * FROM TABLE_NAME WHERE DT BETWEEN TO_DATE('08/08/2011','dd/mm/yyyy') AND TO_DATE('12/08/2011','dd/mm/yyyy');
Edited by: bootstrap on Aug 13, 2011 7:10 AM

>
>
but what is the problem with that, why that date is not matched when i am providing the date format ?Which part don't you understand? You did not use TO_DATE while inserting data and default date format was mm/dd/yyyy, right? Same default date format is used if you issue:
SELECT * FROM TABLE_NAME Your original post states the above select returns:
ID     DT
003     11/8/2011
002     10/8/2011
001     9/8/2011So dates you inserted are November 8, 2011, October 8 2011 and September 8 2011. Now TO_DATE('08/08/2011','dd/mm/yyyy') is August 8 2011 and TO_DATE('12/08/2011','dd/mm/yyyy') is August 12 2011. So obviously:
SELECT * FROM TABLE_NAME WHERE DT BETWEEN TO_DATE('08/08/2011','dd/mm/yyyy') AND TO_DATE('12/08/2011','dd/mm/yyyy');will not return any rows. Bottome line - never write code that uses implicit date conversions since your code becomes client NLS settings dependent and might work for one client and fail or produce wrong results for other client.
SY.

Sp_sproc_columns not returning row for "@RETURN_VALUE"

Hello folks...
I have published a CLR stored procedure to replace a "normally created" stored procedure.
If I execute "sp_sproc_columns" for the CLR procedure, it does not return a row for "@RETURN_VALUE".
If I execute "sp_sproc_columns" for any normally created stored procedures, there is a row for "@RETURN_VALUE".
Code used: exec sp_sproc_columns N'PROC_NAME_HERE',@ODBCVer=3
For backwards compatibility issues, I need the "@RETURN_VALUE" row to be returned for all CLR Stored procedures.
My CLR stored procedure executes no problem when manually run. It looks like this:
[Microsoft.SqlServer.Server.SqlProcedure]
public static SqlInt32 proc_CreateNewFile(out String filename)
return 0;
I have tried changing the data type so INT is returned, but no luck either.
SQL Server 2014 is the version being used.
Thanks!

And as a workaround you might call a TSQL wrapper proc instead of calling the CLR proc directly.
David
David http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dbrowne/

MapViewer.getGeneratedImaegURL() does not return https for SSL mapviewers

We've setup a SSL mapviewer with an https:// URI but MapViewer.getGeneratedMapImageURL returns http://uri:7002 instead of https://uri:7002
This is easy enough to fix by testing if the getServiceURL starts with "https" and testing the start of getGeneratedMapURL and then replacing the "http:" with "https:" but it's a bug so we're reporting it here.
Thanks, Mark

Hi Mark,
thanks for your note. We will look it.
Joao

Maintaining Budgets for WBS element.

Hi all,
My operating concern currency is USD while my company code currency is CAD.
When I am assigning budgets t my WBS element using tcode CJ30, it displaying the currency as USD. However, I want it to be displayed as CAD.
What needs to be done for this?

Hi,
You can enter the budget either in controlling area currency, object currency or transaction currency. You can define your WBS to be managed in CAD, and set the profile to object currency (OPS9), for example.
Regards,
Eli

GetResourceObjects not returning groupType for AD Group

Hi Everyone. I'm getting the following error when I try to return group details on a search from IDM.
"The number of values returned from the search search did not match the number of attributes requested"
I'm using the getResourceObjects formutil method with the following searchAttrsToGet
<list>
<s>CN</s>
<s>distinguishedName</s>
<s>groupType</s>
</list>
If I remove the <s>groupType</s> from the list everything works fine. My search criteria is:
<concat>
<s>(&(objectClass=group)(distinguishedName=</s>
<ref>groupDN</ref>
<s>))</s>
</concat>
Any ideas?

Hi - I am having the same problem, however I am trying to retrieve the member object. In my case, I need to use the "getResourceObjects" method, as when I use "getResourceObject" I am unable to view the members' DN ( only saMAccountName is returned).
Any ideas on how I can work around this? It appears that the getResourceObjects method fails on some groups but not on others.

ACE snmpwalk not return values for CISCO-SLB-MIB

Hi everyone,
I need some help with snmp for the ACE. I am unable to get any results when running an snmpwalk for the object slbVServerClientByteCounts.
In fact, I get no results for anything related to CISCO-SLB-MIB. I can run an snmp translate against this mib and I am able to get the OIDs but when I run an snmpwalk against the ACE I get nothing for this mibs. I do however get results for the mibs: SNMPv2-SMI, IF-MIB, IP-MIB etc..etc..
My main goal is to get the traffic going to the virtual server vip and then graph it. I need to use the CISCO-SLB-MIB to do this.
Can someone please help? I will try and answer your questions to the best of my knowledge.
Thank you.

Ok I fully understand. I have verified that I have only one context (Admin).
Would you be able to explain why I am able to see some oid data and nothing for others? Your results for oid slbVServerClientByteCounts is exactly what I am looking for.
This is what I have:
snmpwalk -v 2c -c xxxxx 172.16.14.100 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.161.1.4.2.1
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.2.1.39 = STRING: "Port80"
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.2.1.40 = STRING: "Port100"
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.2.1.41 = STRING: "Port1010"
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.2.1.42 = STRING: "Port21"
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.2.1.43 = STRING: "Port444"
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.3.1.39 = STRING: "test"
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.3.1.40 = STRING: "test"
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.3.1.41 = STRING: "test"
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.3.1.42 = STRING: "test"
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.3.1.43 = STRING: "test"
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.4.1.39 = INTEGER: 2
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.4.1.40 = INTEGER: 2
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.4.1.41 = INTEGER: 2
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.4.1.42 = INTEGER: 1
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.4.1.43 = INTEGER: 1
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.5.1.39 = STRING: "Operational"
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.5.1.40 = STRING: "Operational"
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.5.1.41 = STRING: "Operational"
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.5.1.42 = STRING: "No Active serverfarm(s) in Policy"
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.5.1.43 = STRING: "No Active serverfarm(s) in Policy"
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.6.1.39 = Gauge32: 134
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.6.1.40 = Gauge32: 25
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.6.1.41 = Gauge32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.6.1.42 = Gauge32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.7.1.39 = Counter32: 510534985
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.7.1.40 = Counter32: 26901235
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.7.1.41 = Counter32: 86784
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.7.1.42 = Counter32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.7.1.43 = Counter32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.8.1.39 = Counter32: 128982
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.8.1.40 = Counter32: 3167
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.8.1.41 = Counter32: 7
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.8.1.42 = Counter32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.8.1.43 = Counter32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.9.1.39 = Counter32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.9.1.40 = Counter32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.9.1.41 = Counter32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.9.1.42 = Counter32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.9.1.43 = Counter32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.10.1.39 = Counter32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.10.1.40 = Counter32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.10.1.41 = Counter32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.10.1.42 = Counter32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.10.1.43 = Counter32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.11.1.39 = Counter64: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.11.1.40 = Counter64: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.11.1.41 = Counter64: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.11.1.42 = Counter64: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.11.1.43 = Counter64: 0

Function Module to obtain Initial Budget and Available Budget of WBS

Hi,
I need to calculate the value for Initial and Available budget for WBS which comes in the report S_ALR_87013558 or S_ALR_87013648.
Is there any FM to calculate for the particular WBS.
Thanks

Hi,
Try using KBPR_READ_DATA function module.
Regards,
Eli

Find an item not returning results in SharePoint calendar list

Environment: SharePoint 2013 upgraded to SP1. We have 1000s of team sites that have been upgraded from 2010 to 2013. In the lists in these sites, quite often I encounter that
Find an item does not return results for certain fields other than the title field. For example, we have a calendar list which has a Single Line of Text field. I can not get meaningful results searching on
this field. I have tried this, no luck:
http://www.enjoysharepoint.com/Articles/Details/sharepoint-2013-find-an-item-search-box-does-not-return-20956.aspx
Search service crawls incremental every hour. I hope this does not need a full crawl.
Thanks, Soumya | MCITP, SharePoint 2010

Thanks Ganesh. All these settings are as you recommended it to be. Nonetheless I double checked and here are the results:
Ensure in the Search Service Application that the Web Application is included in the Content Source under SharePoint Start Addresses.
Yes. Please remember we are getting search results. To be specific we are not getting Find items in the list to be returning accurate results.
Make sure that the address in Alternate access mappings default text box is same as the start crawl address in the search service application.
Yes.
List Setting - Allow items from this list to appear in search results? yes
Ensured
set “Require content approval for submitted item?” to “No”.
It is set to "No". However, will it not work for approved contents also?
Thanks, Soumya | MCITP, SharePoint 2010

Oracle XML functions return tags for null columns.

I am currently writing a SOAP Message base on a SQL statement formatted as XML. However, I am having problems with Oracle XML functions not returning tags for null columns as seen in my example below. Is the a way to get Oracle XML functions to return empty tags for null column?
CREATE TABLE FOREXAMPLE_TABLE (COLUMN_1 VARCHAR2 (4000),
COLUMN_2 VARCHAR2 (4000),
COLUMN_3 VARCHAR2 (4000));
INSERT INTO FOREXAMPLE_TABLE (COLUMN_2)
VALUES ('This column is not null');
COMMIT;
SELECT XMLELEMENT ( "soap:Envelope",
XMLATTRIBUTES ( 'http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/' AS "xmlns:soap"),
XMLELEMENT ( "soap:Body",
XMLATTRIBUTES ( 'http://Custom_Column/types/' AS "xmlns:ns1"),
XMLELEMENT ( "ns1:New_Instance",
XMLELEMENT ( "ns1:Input_XMLDoc",
XMLFOREST(fe.COLUMN_1 as "Column_1",
fe.COLUMN_2 as "Column_2",
fe.COLUMN_3 as "Column_3"))))) as xml
FROM FOREXAMPLE_TABLE fe
The results returned from the select statement.
<soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<soap:Body xmlns:ns1="http://Custom_Column/types/"><ns1:New_Instance>
<ns1:Input_XMLDoc><Column_2>This column is not null</Column_2>
</ns1:Input_XMLDoc></ns1:New_Instance></soap:Body></soap:Envelope>
The desired results for the select statement.
<soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<soap:Body xmlns:ns1="http://Custom_Column/types/"><ns1:New_Instance>
<ns1:Input_XMLDoc><Column_1></Column_1>
<Column_2>This column is not null</Column_2><Column_3></Column_3>
</ns1:Input_XMLDoc></ns1:New_Instance></soap:Body></soap:Envelope>
jeeman

An alternative may be be to use xmlconcat instead of xmlforest:
Time Start: 30.06.2007 18:52:41
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
michaels> select xmlelement
          ("soap:Envelope",
           xmlattributes
                  ('http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/' as "xmlns:soap"),
           xmlelement
                ("soap:Body",
                 xmlattributes ('http://Custom_Column/types/' as "xmlns:ns1"),
                 xmlelement ("ns1:New_Instance",
                             xmlelement ("ns1:Input_XMLDoc",
                                         xmlconcat (xmlelement("Column_1", fe.column_1),
                                                    xmlelement("Column_2", fe.column_2),
                                                    xmlelement("Column_3", fe.column_3)
          ).extract('.').getstringval() as xml
from (select null column_1, 'This column is not null' column_2,
               null column_3
          from dual) fe
XML
<soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<soap:Body xmlns:ns1="http://Custom_Column/types/">
    <ns1:New_Instance>
      <ns1:Input_XMLDoc>
        <Column_1/>
        <Column_2>This column is not null</Column_2>
        <Column_3/>
      </ns1:Input_XMLDoc>
    </ns1:New_Instance>
</soap:Body>
</soap:Envelope>

Do not want Budget check & Commitment value for purchase Requisition

Hi Experts,
I hope you all are doing well.
My client's requirement is that at the time of Creation of Purchase Requisition there should be no budget check against WBS element and also Commitment value should not be for Purchase Requisition.
Please suggest.
Thanks & Regards

Hi Gokul,
Thanks for ur quick reply.
I have done changes in tolerence limit (activated it for PO only).
Now i created 1 Project PR of more than value of budget (system didnt check the Budget against WBS) but when i am trying to create PO with reference to same PR, system is giving error of budget. That is OK for me.
Now my requirement is to not take PR value as commitment in my reports, i want only PO value in Commitment column of repport.
I have read all 3 notes suggested by you. Can u tell me whcih one should i implement to stop PR value as commitment in reports.
Thanks & Regards

PR eliminated not return budget for WBS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for