PR from MRP should not go to Release

Dear All,
How to control that PR generated from MRP Run should not go to Release Process.
Regards,
Pardeep Mlaik

Hi,
Have a concept always that to keep two document types of PR ieu2026u2026one is document type of manual PR & another document type for MRP PR document type .Now link plant, MRP group & MRP PR document type in OMDT t.code & maintain the MRP group in the MRP 1 view of the material master.
Do not keep value of MRP PR document type in release characteristic of document type of PR. So when you design your release strategy, you would not have option to select MRP PR document type.
Now when system will create MRP PR, you just view the MRP PR with no release TAB.
Regards,
Biju K

Similar Messages

Purchase order printout should not happen without release of PO

I have made all the settings for PO release strategy and printout settings. But printout can be taken even before final release. I checked the settings and this printout should not happen before release. Please help me out.
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
Thank ypu for your reply. PO was not released. Printout wa snot able to be taken in ME9F. But Printout can be taken using Print preview in Tcode ME22N. Can we avoid such printing using Print preview option.
Thank you in advance

Security Deposit Amount from customer should not be deducted

Hi,
client requirement is Security deposit from Dealer(Customer) should not show the balance of amount of Invoice of the Dealer, It should be shown seperately and not show the balance after deducting Security deposit. This security deposit is returnable to Dealer.
So, all the invoice raised to customer and credit memo should be shown different amount without deducting from Secutiy deposits.
For example If Rs. 1lakhs is security deposit
there r 3 invoice of debit against Customer say 60000. In customer line item it should not show the balance of Rs40000. It should show only 3invoice amount of Rs.60000 and it should show seperately Rs.1lakhs.
IS Thereany configuration of this scenerio.
Regards,
Sreekanth

Hello,
This is what expected to do.
That is the reason SAP has provided with two check boxes in FBL5N.
If you select only normal items you will be shown INR +60000
If you select both normal items and special GL items, you will be shown INR 40000- (-10000+60000)
If you select special GL items it will be shown -100000
There is nothing special you are required to do.
Regards,
Ravi

Docuemnts from DMS should not give option to save on to local disk

Dear Experts
Today the business requirement is
"The users who accessing docuemnts from DMS thru Portal -
They should not be able to save the docuemnts to local disk for offline usage."
Can we acheive it.
Our portal is SAP NW2004s on SP14.
Rgds

Hello Srinivas,
I haven't used DMS, however i think restricting this would be a bit difficult.
Regards,
Siddhesh

Project Definition should not change after releasing

Hi SAP Gurus,
Could anyone please throw some light on the method to disable project definiton field from changing after it has been released..

Hi,
Master data lock can be used with reference to the object selected, by going to editstatus-Lock----- master data, by selecting this, all the data (like fields present with respect that object, excluding cost planning, budgeting, account assignment) pertaining to the object will be locked and you wouldn't be able to make changes to those fields.
Now, coming to automating of this lock can be done through using user status, when you set that user status, all the master data will locked.
Regards
Avisek Bhardwaj

My Bionic does not work properly. The phone should not have been released...dead Camels

I took my Bionic back to Verizon yesterday. I am not getting 4G data, and it will not work in the car dock. When I got to the store, I had 4G, and it worked perfectly in the dock, all he did was sit it in. This phone must only work in the store, maybe that is why they released it before it was ready.
The Verizon technician told me that there were problems with the phone, but that the responsibility belonged to Motorola. He said there was going to be an update in November and that I should wait. This concerns me because it means Verizon will pass the buck on this one.
What choice do I have? My return period is way over. I am paying for a service that I don't have yet I can't get out of it. If the phone can't be fixed by a software update, then what? At that point, I will either hope for a class action suite, or cancel my contract and pay $350 so that I can get a decent phone....iPhone from AT&T. That would be cheaper than buying a new phone from Verizon under my current contract. I can't keep a phone that never works.
I think yesterday was like the straw that broke the camel's back for me. I tried for 15 min to get the car dock to work, and nothing would turn it on. That is when I just drove to Verizon. I figured they should see one more unhappy customer in person instead of just online...alas, no one there gave a **bleep** and they are still trying to sell the Bionic to the unsuspecting customer. It should be pulled off of the shelf until it is fixed.
Joey

techwhiz wrote:
Verizon and Motorola didn't have the time to test the Bionic.
They were too busy working on the Razr and screwing us.
PRE-ORDER YOUR DROID RAZR TOMORROW 10.27 8AM EDT
Introducing DROID RAZR by Motorola.
The ultimate power of DROID. The legendary edge of RAZR. Combined to form the world's thinnest 4G LTE smartphone.
• Android 2.3 Gingerbread OS
• Dual-core 1.2 GHz processor
• KEVLAR® strong back plate, Gorilla® Glass face
• 7.1 mm thin with big 4.3 inch Super AMOLED Advanced display
My Bionic did it again. It is not recognizing the car dock, and it is not getting data connection. I sat in a La Madelains for 15 min hoping for data. Then, when I drove home, I tried the car dock...nothing. This is basically a little 3G tablet with WiFi and a phone. I can do most of that better with my iPad.
Joey

ITunes 11 should not have been released with this extreme a bug.

When I plug in my iPad, and try to add content from the TV Shows section, you cannot scroll past the fist 10 shows. It just sticks. When you use the arrow keys, it goes off the page, so you can't see which show you are on, and even though the episode list shows on the right for which ever show you are on (thought you cant see it),but then the title is off the screen.
This is HUGE and way beyond something Apple should have caught. I am a huge apple fan, but totally disgusted at the moment. Are other people experiencing this issue?

ALL - I tried what you are suggesting, and it "technically" works, but you still end up bouncing back and forth from the left side of the page (where the TV series are) to the right side of the page (where the episodes are). It is completely annoying...
Apple, if you are listening, you should be able to scroll WITHIN THE BOX on the left, and then see the episodes on the right.
I appreciate the suggestions, at least it is a work around, but not at all what one would expect from a new release.
NOTE TO APPLE:
I bought into your marketing, have purchased huge amounts of content, so dont penalize me for it by making me jump up and down my screen like a Jack-in-the-box whenever I want to add content to my iPhone or iPad.

Quantity from PR should not rounded off in PO

Hi Friends,
If suppose PR quantity is 1.65 SFT. While adopting data from PR, system is showing 1SFT in PO.But I want it to be 1.65 ASFT only. So please suggest, what customizations I have to do?...
Regards,
Edited by: k prasanna on Mar 5, 2009 4:19 AM

Hi,
I have maintained EX as lotsize for PD items and HB as lotsize for VB items. other than this I have not maintained any rounding off in MRP Screens. Please suggest, what else fields I have to check?
Regards,..
Edited by: k prasanna on Mar 17, 2009 6:42 PM

Schedule lines should not change 3 weeks time from MRP date

Hi
Is there any specific customisation required to get following results in case of schedule lines.
1) MRP should not change/adjust the already send delivery schedule lines which are lying within 3 weeks time from MRP date
2) System should not allow to book the GRN unless the messages / print out has been generated from the system in case of scheduling agreement.
Thanking you
Shantakumar
09944009752

Hi,
There are 2 possibilities:
1. use MRP fixing using planning time fences, this is done by putting the relevant settings in the MRP1 view of the material master
2. use the firming options of the scheduling agreement, these are set per material number that is entered in the scheduling agreement.
The GR can only be posted for schedule lines that have been processed aka output generated.
Regards,

New release strategy should not trgger for PO released with old Rel Strategy

Hi All,
Please suggest. Po has been fully released with Release Strtgy V1 XX. Now I m replacing release strategy XX with ZZ. If I change any po which has old rel str XX , system will reset new release strategy as in config changeability indicator 4 maintained.
But requirement is if there is any change or value decreasing in fully released Pos with old strategy it should not retrigger new release strategy. If value Increases then New strategy should retrigger.
Please help me on this.
regards,
Rohit

HI Rohit
A reset of the release strategy only takes place if
       - the changeability of the release indicator is set to '4' in
          case of a purchase requisition and '4' or '6' in case of
          another purchasing document (purchase order, request for
          quotation, contract, scheduling agreement),
       - the document is still subject to the previous release
          strategy,
       - the new TOTAL NET ORDER VALUE is higher than the old one.
The most important thing to consider in to avoid changes to release strategy customizing once the release strategy is used.
The commom steps are:
1- make sure all of the old POs should have been released.
2- don't delete/change the original release strategy. create a new release strategy with copy function, then the old release strategy will not be replaced.
3- if you delete the original release strategy and add a new release strategy which the characteristics in classification is same as old release strategy then the PO (have been approved) will be replaced with the new release strategy.
Kind regards,
Lorraine

MRP Generated PR should not be converted into PO before release date.

Gurus,
In MRP generated PR system defines a release date for the PR(date by which the PR should get converted into PO).My requirement is system sholud not allow me to convert that PR into PO before that Release date.
MRP generated PR are not subjected to Release strategy.
Is their any Configuration,User Exit for it.
SN

Hello Sanjay,
please try setting up an error from OMCQ t-code.
If this not helps then please contact your abaper, I m sure he will find out a way out of this.
Hope this helps..
Robin

Process order should not take part in MRP run

Hello Colleagues
I looking for a way how to exclude not released process orders (we have PP-PI) from MD04 report. Not released process order should not take part in MRP run. I was trying to do it using OPJJ for availability check 02 and checking rule PP but I was not able to get result. Could you please help, probably there are other settings?
Best Regards
Eduard

Hi,
Settings in OPJJ will take effect only when you create or release process orders.
As a work around you can try to exclude process order is
1. Create a Storage location and make it not relevant for MRP-OMIR
2. In Material master for the material in MRP assign storage location MRP as 1 (exclude storage location stock)
3. Create the process order, in the GR tab enter the storage location (not MRP relevant)
In the MRP run it will not take the process order into account.
After releasing change the storage location to the normal sotrage location.
In this process flow, the control is with the storage location.
Check it in your sandbox.
Thanks,
JK

Scheduling Agreement -Schedule line should not pass the requirement to MRP

Hi Friends!
As we all know the scheduling agreements is outline agreement with future schedule lines, with this system will pass the requirements to MRP for the schedule line which is even after 5 years, so my requirement is if the schedule line date is above 15 days from the current date then requirement should not pass to MRP.
solution which we gave is, SA initially will determine the schedule line category as CN (which will not transfer the requirement) and a batch job program will run daily and it will check for each schedule line if any of the schedule is with in the 15 days from the current date then it will change the schedule line category from CN to CP.
Now the problem is , by using Batch Job which program I have to call to change the schedule line category?????
1. we tried BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE but when we are changing the CN to CP it is not performing ATP where as if we do manually it is performing.
2. we tried BDC but here also we facing some strange problem i.e. while recording the ATP screen is not populating where it is coming while doing manual.
Can someone let me know which one program we should call in Batch job to do this change.
Regards
Nath

Hi nath,
i also failed in changing shedule line category in userexit and in BAPI.
in one case, i succeded in doing it with a bdc after MV45AFZZ / userexit_save just bevore the datas are reset but after the commit-work is processed.
the other possibility is, to change the accepted amount in userexit RV03VFZZ / USEREXIT_AVAILABILITY_OUT.
3. possibility is, to block the order with a delivery - block , same as the credit-control-block. This block can be set in MV45AFZZ or perhaps in BAPI too.
hans

Without standard release confirmation should not allow in process order

Our clients need is that without standard release confirmation should not allow in process order.
We are using CORK,cor6 and MB31 My need is to apply user exit in all cases.
I got input from sdn User exit:-PPCO0006 Function module Exit_SAPLCOZF_003
INCLUDE ZXCO1U06
I need to activate this only during confirmation.ie confirmation to be avoided if cost is not released.
Regards,
Pert

Hi,
You are right. For preventing confirmation in case std cost estimate release is not available you need to do enhancement. You can check for following exit along with exit which you mentioned in your post :
Enhancement CONFPI05
EXIT_SAPLCORF_405 - Process Ord. Conf.: Cust.-Specific Enhancements when Saving
INCLUDE ZXCOFU10
Check either of the enhancements which may fulfill your business requirement.
Regards,
Tejas

PO should not go for approval if it is from a contract

Dear Gurus,
This company wants to approve the contract but the POs created from that contract should not go for approval again. Please give an idea to achieve this requirement?
Thanks,
Chameendri

Hi,
We need to define Contract under characteristics of PO approval process goto SPRO > Materials Management > Purchase Order > Release Procedure fro Purchase Orders > Edit Class
Enter Class : for example POREL , class type 032 > Char tab
Enter POCONTRACT under characteristics
Enter Contract Number under description
Enter CHAR under Data Type
Enter 10 under No.of characters and 0 under decimal places
Then go to PO release strategy > Classification
Enter Contract Number under characteristic Description and Value leave it blank
this is what we did in our company and it is working fine.
POs created with referece to approved contract is not triggering to approval process again.
I dont know whether you are still waiting for the answer.
Please try and let us know the results, if it works.
Thanks.
Udaya

PR from MRP should not go to Release

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for