PR not generating for MRP type VB

hi all,
i have bill of material wich contain some raw material. for this raw material i have maintained MRP type VB , along with reorder point and safety stock in material master
but after MRP run, i am not gettting requirenemnt of raw material, if i changed the MRP type to PD , then requirenment (PR) coming for raw material. MRP control parameter are NETCH,1,3,1,1,1
so why i m not geting requirenment with MRP type VB.

hi,
Try in the below way:
Make the Create Preq. indicator as 2 in the planning file...make the delievery schedule as 1(ie. no schedule line)( this would be one of the mistake as you specified as 3)...
Then maintain the source list with the MRP indicator as 1, make the vendor as FIX, Define proper valid dates in it and save...
Now try and revert back...
Hope it helps..
Regards
Priyanka.P

Similar Messages

Schedule Lines not generated for MRP Type PD

HI All,
I have created Schduling Agreement, maintained Source List with MRP Relevant - 2 option and maintained Vendor as Fix, maintained info record.
I have created a material with MRP type as PD and lot size as EX, and strategy group as MTS. Now when i enter requirement through MD61 and do MRP Run through MD02, system is generating PR instead of Del Schdule line inspite of schduling agreement.
But If i change MRP type to VB and maintain reorder point and maintain min lot size, then system generates Del Schdule lines for the same material.
What could be the reason. I want delivery schedules based on MRP Type PD.
Where I am wrong in MRP Views or in any cutomization. It seems that purchasing part is fine since it creats scudles line so no problem in SA or in Source List.
Please help
Regards,
Vikas

I have created Schduling Agreement, maintained Source List with MRP Relevant - 2 option and maintained Vendor as Fix, maintained info record.
I have created a material with MRP type as PD and lot size as EX, and strategy group as MTS. Now when i enter requirement through MD61 and do MRP Run through MD02, system is generating PR instead of Del Schdule line inspite of schduling agreement.
But If i change MRP type to VB and maintain reorder point and maintain min lot size, then system generates Del Schdule lines for the same material.
What could be the reason. I want delivery schedules based on MRP Type PD.
Where I am wrong in MRP Views or in any cutomization. It seems that purchasing part is fine since it creats scudles line so no problem in SA or in Source List.
Hi Vikas,
After being thru with your query,i would like to reply your ultimate question"I want delivery schedules based on MRP Type PD"
Simple answer:put parameter 'delivery schedule line' as '3'(schedule lines in opening period) without simulation mode.
Please make sure you don't make any change with previous settings(custom)
please get it done and revert.
Regards
Chandra

Pur req not generated for MRP element Planned order in stock reqmnts list

Hi SAP Gurus,
I have a problem where in MD04, pur req is not generated for the MRP element Planned order for a future date (about two months from now). Is there a specific reason? why is it not being generated? The MRP type is PD. The procurement type is F - external procurement. Can anybody please help me on this?
Thanks
Anusha

Anusha,
?? Not sure I understand the question. Are you saying MRP is creating planned orders instead of purchase reqs? Or, are you saying that no proposals at all are being created outside of two months? Or, are you saying that the system is creating purchase reqs inside of two months, and planned orders outside of two months?
Regardless, these problems are probably related to your MRP settings. Try the following settings:
NEUPL   Regenerative planning
1       Purchase requisitions
3       Schedule lines
1       MRP list
3       Delete and recreate planning data
2       Lead time scheduling and capacity planning
on your MDBT screen.
Regards,
DB49

Schedule lines not generated after MRP run

Dear All,
I am trying to create Schedule lines through MRP run , but instead system creates MRP element PRqRel and its PurRqs when i check in MD04 , the following are the prerequisite i done before MRP run , but still Schedule lines are not generating.
1.activated checkbox source list in material master.,Procurement type is F, MRP type PD , lot size MB , marked JIT Scheduling indicator as 1 in Pur view of material master , no MRP group is used in our process.
2.Maintained Inforecord.
3.Maintained source list for the material and marked MRP relevant as 2. Validity also checked.
4. Quota arrangement for this vendor only.
5. Created New scheduling agreement.
6. Material is not sent for subcontracting.
7. Ran MD02 with following parameters ,
Processing key NETCH Net Change in Total Horizon
Create purchase req. 1 Purchase requisitions in opening period
Delivery schedules 3 Schedule lines
Create MRP list 1 MRP list
Planning mode 3 Adapt planning data (normal mode)
Please let me know if i am missing something
Thanks in Advance
Benny

Hi,
Please check the below links...
Schedule Lines not getting created in MRP
Schedule Lines not generated for MRP Type PD
Kuber

MRP is not generating purchase requisitions consistently for MRP type VB

Issue: When executing consumption based MRP in ECC 6.0 using the following parameters; purchase requisitions are not created for all material with stocks below max stock levels. In other words requisitions are created incase of some materials and requisitions are not created for others.
u2022     MRP type VB ( manual reorder point) with reorder point qty
u2022     Lot size HB with Max stock level
u2022     Procurement type F (external procurement).
Additional info: Some of these materials are batch managed and results are inconsistence whether it is batch managed or not.
Regards
Sai

I checked that and planning file entry is created.
Example 1: MRP is not working.
MRP type = VB
Lot size =HB
Procurement type= F
Material # = 1200045
Reorder point =30
Max stock level = 300
Available qty = 139
No PRs are existing before MRP.
MRP is expected to create PR for qty 161 (300-139= 161)
Example 2 : MRP is working.
MRP type = VB
Lot size =HB
Procurement type= F
Material # = 1200052
Reorder point =100
Max stock level = 1000
Available qty = 87
MRP created PR qty of 913 and results are as expected.
MRP is expected to create PR for qty 161 (1000-87= 913
NOTE: I am directly creating Purchase requisitions by selecting creation Purchase Requisitions Indicator =1 during MD01/MD02 trxs . Not creating any planned orders.

Planning File Entry not generated for items releveant to PM

MRP procedure used for material is reorder based planning , in April -09 the stock for this material is consumed and becomes
zero (reorder point is 8 ,Maximum Stock Level is 8 ) and after that in MRP run the requirement is not generated .
But as per the setting of reorder point PR should be initiated.
When checked the MD21 , material is not flagged ,
I want to know the specific reason why only this material is not flagged for MRP run.
What all settings i can check ?
MATERIAL TYPE : YMRO OP Maint/ Repair/OperSup
Lot size : Repl. to max. stock level after cov. req
Procurement type : F

Hi,
Run the reports MDRE & MDAB to ensure the planning file entries are correct.
About your query what might have caused a entry not to be in planning file, well it could be many. So run the above reports & then run MRP & check the results.
Regards,
Vivek

Error M8-688 - Creation of several vendor line items is not possible for document type RN.

Hello All,
We are using the Net Invoice Posting with document type RN(Invoice- Net). We are generating different vendor line items in the accounting document based on the withholding tax codes involved in the invoice posting. When it comes to net invoice posting system is giving an error message M8-688 - Creation of vendor line items is not possible for document type RN. Is there is any way to create multiple vendor items with net invoice posting? Please suggest.
Thanks,
Chandu.

I dont think that there is any way because it is a hardcoded error message.
      IF NOT t003-xnetb IS INITIAL.
        MESSAGE e688 WITH pi_rbkpv-blart.
      ENDIF.
SAP is checking the customizing for net/gross posting per document type in table T003
And if it is set up as net, then it is a hard error.

Accounting document not generating for excise invoice-please help

Dear all ,
my issue is
accounting document not generating for excise invoice
we are creating accounting document in J1iin
with refferance to billing document but the accounting docuemnt is not generating
the accounting document for billing document is generated
so why the accounting document for excise invoice is not genrating its showing the correct amount in BED ,cee and HE Secc.
please help

Dear G. Lakshmipathi,
As uknow i am getting problem when i am creating the debit memo
so is there any specific ETT for debit memo is there .because we are not maintaining delivery type to billing type here in CIN setting
so its not goods removal through sales . so what will be transaction type for this.
how to check the error that why the accounting document is not generated as no error log is also comming.
so please help me in this regards.
Thanks with Regards
Subrat

Credit Management- KRML Output not generated for Sales Order ( v.v.u.)

<u>Credit Management - Credit control check at Sales order Level</u>
While saving the Sales order,which failed the Credit check ( As per Automatic Credit Check Settings), there is no output generated for output type KRML, for Partner Fn KB/KM. Normally,If credit check is NOK, then while saving the sales order, an internal mail is sent to the SAP office inbox of the Credit representative ( KB/KM). There is option for an external send also. The problem faced by us is that, the mail is not going in SAP Office inbox in quality server , it is going in developement server.We checked in table NAST that the Output for KRML (o/p type) is not generated. Kindly suggest what could be the reason.
Regards
Sunil Kumar

Dear Mr. Gauravjit,
Thank you for your valuable reply.
At the Extra-Output-Header-edit-goto-det analysis ,system give message as KRML o/p is not generated since Requirement 009 is not being fulfilled. But we checked the VBUK-CMGST = B is satisfied. Still the o/p not generated!
Also , in VV11 we maintained the Cond Records. Still the o/p is not coming.
The output is coming in Devlopment , but in Quality the output is not coming.
Can anybody please help !
P.S. I am colleague of Mr. Sunil Kumar, and reply on behalf of him.
With Best Regards,
Kaustuv

TimeStream Error (not generated for year 1970)

Dear Experts ,
I am facing a problem with Time Stream .... When i try to open a Planning Book i am receiving the following message:
Timestream (TS ZBRSNP_ZF ) not generated for year 1970
Message no. T9507
Diagnosis
The date is outside the periods maintained in the factory or planning calendar (timestreams).
System Response
The error causes a system crash.
Procedure
a) Regenerate the timestream as far in the future (or possibly the past) as possible
or
b) Use the report ZZTSTRDELE to delete the runtime objects of the timestreams, if changes have been made to Customizing settings. For more information, see SAP Note 169885.
It starts happen after i included Initial Column at Planning Book .... The Factory Calendar that i am using starts on 2006 and ends on 2020 .... The timestream i am using is looking for 2 years in the past and 9 years in the future.
*The message above says that it is necessary to execute report ZZTSTRDELE but i am having some problems while donwloading SAP note. It is possible do delete it manually? exist another way to fix this issue?
Please i hope someone can help me as soon as possible ....
My Best Regards
Mauricio Filho

Hi Sunitha,
We have same type of problem now, could you plz adivise me how to fix this error and where we need to configure to overcome this error.
Thanks in advance
Sreeenivasu

Connection has no password, -jdbc.xml file not generated for connection

Hi,
I'm migrating a jdev 10g web application (with EJB) to 11g, i did the automatic migration tool offred by 11g, i'm using the integrated weblogic server but it seems there is a *-jdbc.xml file missed, and it must be generated, this is the log file of the start of server :
IntegratedWebLogicServer started.
[Running application SAB_ADMIN on Server Instance IntegratedWebLogicServer...]
[09:14:15 AM] ---- Deployment started. ----
[09:14:15 AM] Target platform is (Weblogic 10.3).
[09:14:18 AM] Retrieving existing application information
[09:14:19 AM] Running dependency analysis...
[09:14:19 AM] Deploying 4 profiles...
[09:14:21 AM] Wrote Web Application Module to C:\Users\Moshe\AppData\Roaming\JDeveloper\system11.1.1.3.37.56.60\o.j2ee\drs\SAB_ADMIN\ViewControllerWebApp.war
[09:14:21 AM] Wrote Web Application Module to C:\Users\Moshe\AppData\Roaming\JDeveloper\system11.1.1.3.37.56.60\o.j2ee\drs\SAB_ADMIN\ModelWebApp.war
[09:14:25 AM] Wrote EJB Module to C:\Users\Moshe\AppData\Roaming\JDeveloper\system11.1.1.3.37.56.60\o.j2ee\drs\SAB_ADMIN\ModelEJB.jar
[09:14:25 AM] WARNING: Connection DBConnectionSAB has no password. DBConnectionSAB-jdbc.xml file not generated for connection DBConnectionSAB.
[09:14:26 AM] Wrote Enterprise Application Module to C:\Users\Moshe\AppData\Roaming\JDeveloper\system11.1.1.3.37.56.60\o.j2ee\drs\SAB_ADMIN
[09:14:26 AM] Deploying Application...
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:28.065--ServerSession(40464643)--property eclipselink.jdbc.user is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.user should be used instead.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:28.299--ServerSession(40464643)--property eclipselink.jdbc.driver is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.driver should be used instead.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:28.299--ServerSession(40464643)--property eclipselink.jdbc.url is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.url should be used instead.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:28.299--ServerSession(40464643)--property eclipselink.jdbc.password is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.password should be used instead.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Warning> <EJB> <BEA-012035> <The Remote interface method: 'public abstract java.lang.Object oracle.user.Session_user.mergeEntity(java.lang.Object)' in EJB 'SessionEJB' contains a parameter of type: 'java.lang.Object' which is not Serializable. Though the EJB 'SessionEJB' has call-by-reference set to false, this parameter is not Serializable and hence will be passed by reference. A parameter can be passed using call-by-value only if the parameter type is Serializable.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Warning> <EJB> <BEA-012035> <The Remote interface method: 'public abstract java.lang.Object oracle.user.Session_user.persistEntity(java.lang.Object)' in EJB 'SessionEJB' contains a parameter of type: 'java.lang.Object' which is not Serializable. Though the EJB 'SessionEJB' has call-by-reference set to false, this parameter is not Serializable and hence will be passed by reference. A parameter can be passed using call-by-value only if the parameter type is Serializable.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Warning> <EJB> <BEA-012035> <The Remote interface method: 'public abstract java.lang.Object oracle.bouton.Session_bouton.mergeEntity(java.lang.Object)' in EJB 'Session_bouton' contains a parameter of type: 'java.lang.Object' which is not Serializable. Though the EJB 'Session_bouton' has call-by-reference set to false, this parameter is not Serializable and hence will be passed by reference. A parameter can be passed using call-by-value only if the parameter type is Serializable.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Warning> <EJB> <BEA-012035> <The Remote interface method: 'public abstract java.lang.Object oracle.bouton.Session_bouton.persistEntity(java.lang.Object)' in EJB 'Session_bouton' contains a parameter of type: 'java.lang.Object' which is not Serializable. Though the EJB 'Session_bouton' has call-by-reference set to false, this parameter is not Serializable and hence will be passed by reference. A parameter can be passed using call-by-value only if the parameter type is Serializable.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Warning> <EJB> <BEA-012035> <The Remote interface method: 'public abstract java.lang.Object oracle.operation.Session_operation.mergeEntity(java.lang.Object)' in EJB 'Session_operation' contains a parameter of type: 'java.lang.Object' which is not Serializable. Though the EJB 'Session_operation' has call-by-reference set to false, this parameter is not Serializable and hence will be passed by reference. A parameter can be passed using call-by-value only if the parameter type is Serializable.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Warning> <EJB> <BEA-012035> <The Remote interface method: 'public abstract java.lang.Object oracle.operation.Session_operation.persistEntity(java.lang.Object)' in EJB 'Session_operation' contains a parameter of type: 'java.lang.Object' which is not Serializable. Though the EJB 'Session_operation' has call-by-reference set to false, this parameter is not Serializable and hence will be passed by reference. A parameter can be passed using call-by-value only if the parameter type is Serializable.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:29.656--ServerSession(42285779)--property eclipselink.jdbc.user is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.user should be used instead.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:29.656--ServerSession(42285779)--property eclipselink.jdbc.driver is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.driver should be used instead.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:29.656--ServerSession(42285779)--property eclipselink.jdbc.url is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.url should be used instead.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:29.656--ServerSession(42285779)--property eclipselink.jdbc.password is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.password should be used instead.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Error> <HTTP> <BEA-101371> <There was a failure when processing annotations for application C:\Users\Moshe\AppData\Roaming\JDeveloper\system11.1.1.3.37.56.60\o.j2ee\drs\SAB_ADMIN\ModelWebApp.war. Please make sure that the annotations are valid. The error is oracle.adf.view.faces.webapp.ResourceServlet>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Error> <Deployer> <BEA-149265> <Failure occurred in the execution of deployment request with ID '1287044066833' for task '0'. Error is: 'weblogic.application.ModuleException: Failed to load webapp: 'SAB_CRUD-Model-context-root''
weblogic.application.ModuleException: Failed to load webapp: 'SAB_CRUD-Model-context-root'
     at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppModule.prepare(WebAppModule.java:404)
     at weblogic.application.internal.flow.ScopedModuleDriver.prepare(ScopedModuleDriver.java:180)
     at weblogic.application.internal.flow.ModuleListenerInvoker.prepare(ModuleListenerInvoker.java:199)
     at weblogic.application.internal.flow.DeploymentCallbackFlow$1.next(DeploymentCallbackFlow.java:508)
     at weblogic.application.utils.StateMachineDriver.nextState(StateMachineDriver.java:41)
     Truncated. see log file for complete stacktrace
Caused By: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: oracle.adf.view.faces.webapp.ResourceServlet
     at weblogic.utils.classloaders.GenericClassLoader.findLocalClass(GenericClassLoader.java:280)
     at weblogic.utils.classloaders.GenericClassLoader.findClass(GenericClassLoader.java:253)
     at weblogic.utils.classloaders.ChangeAwareClassLoader.findClass(ChangeAwareClassLoader.java:56)
     at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:303)
     at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:248)
     Truncated. see log file for complete stacktrace

This is the content of my web.xml file where i found the markup <servlet> and i tried to run without the first one but the error still like it was :
<servlet>
<servlet-name>Faces Servlet</servlet-name>
<servlet-class>javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet</servlet-class>
<load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup>
</servlet>
<servlet>
<servlet-name>resources</servlet-name>
<servlet-class>oracle.adf.view.faces.webapp.ResourceServlet</servlet-class>
</servlet>
<servlet>
<servlet-name>resources</servlet-name>
<servlet-class>org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.webapp.ResourceServlet</servlet-class>
</servlet>
<servlet>
<description>Web Service MyConnexionServiceSoapHttpPort</description>
<display-name>Web Service MyConnexionServiceSoapHttpPort</display-name>
<servlet-name>MyConnexionServiceSoapHttpPort</servlet-name>
<servlet-class>oracle.controll.ConnexionBaseDeDonnees</servlet-class>
<load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup>
</servlet>
<servlet>
<servlet-name>ResultatRequetePort</servlet-name>
<servlet-class>oracle.controll.ResultatRequete</servlet-class>
<load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup>
</servlet>
<servlet-mapping>
<servlet-name>Faces Servlet</servlet-name>
<url-pattern>/faces/*</url-pattern>
</servlet-mapping>
<servlet-mapping>
<servlet-name>resources</servlet-name>
<url-pattern>/adf/*</url-pattern>
</servlet-mapping>
<servlet-mapping>
<servlet-name>MyConnexionServiceSoapHttpPort</servlet-name>
<url-pattern>MyConnexionServiceSoapHttpPort</url-pattern>
</servlet-mapping>
<servlet-mapping>
<servlet-name>ResultatRequetePort</servlet-name>
<url-pattern>/ResultatRequetePort</url-pattern>
</servlet-mapping>
Thanks...

Lines are not generated for holidays and sundays

Hi
creating a sale order shcedule lines are not generated for sunday for a particular plant .
Schedule lines are generated for subsequent monday only.
the plant calander is also correct
with regards
partha

Hi
I would really double check the factory calendar ans the of the plant and sales organisation
regards,
Sidi

Excise Accounting document not generated for Imported Asset GR

Dear all,
Excise accounting document is not generated for imported asset goods receipt(MIGO)
but "C" Register part 2 no. is generated,usual accounting document is generated for GR,
Asset is Dr to GR/IR
Process is
1. Create asset purchase order with acct. assignment "A",
2. Customs miro based on p.o.
3. Do GR with excise
4. Post invoice for orginal vendor.
What will be cause of this problem ?
How to solve this issue ?

The above issue may be due to Accout assignmnet -A . Check your accout assignment in spro -mm-purchasing -accout assignment - Asset A - GR Non valuated has Ticked on . If it is ticked on - No Fi entry will happen at the Time of GR .
The reason being , if an FI entry happen for the first time , asset is capitalised . To avoid this GR is made in ur config as this .
rewdzzzz is full if correct
Edited by: manu m on Apr 24, 2010 11:11 AM

Accounting document not generating for excise invoice.

Dear all ,
my issue is
accounting document not generating for excise invoice
we are creating accounting document in J1iin
with refferance to billing document but the accounting docuemnt is not generating
the accounting document for billing document is generated
so why the accounting document for excise invoice is not genrating its showing the correct amount in BED ,cee and HE Secc.
please help
regards
Subrat

IMG -> In Logistics u2013 General -> Tax on Goods Movement -> India -> Account Determination -> Specify Excise Accounts per Excise Transaction
Check if the following is maintained or not
DLFC       CR Credit      PLAAED PLA AED account
DLFC       CR Credit      PLAAT1 PLA AT1 Account
DLFC       CR Credit      PLABED PLA BED account
DLFC       CR Credit      PLACESS PLA cess account
DLFC       CR Credit      PLAECS PLA ECS Account
DLFC       CR Credit      PLASED PLA SED account
DLFC       CR Credit      RG23AED RG 23 AED account
DLFC       CR Credit      RG23AT1 RG 23 AT1 Account
DLFC       CR Credit      RG23BED RG 23 BED account
DLFC       CR Credit      RG23ECS RG 23 ECS Account
DLFC       CR Credit      RG23SED RG 23 SED account
DLFC       DR Debit       MSUSP CENVAT suspense account
Also IMG -> In Logistics u2013 General -> Tax on Goods Movement -> India -> Account Determination -> Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction
Check if for all Excise group u2013 DLFC u2013 Company Code combination GLs are maintained or not (especially in production client)

Period 001/2010 is not open for account type S and G/L 799999

Hi friends
I am in SD. I am trying to create stock for newly created material, movement type 561. system give error Period 001/2010 is not open for account type S and G/L 799999.
I use the T. Code OB52, i am confuse which combination i.e. variant, A, from Account, To Account, from per. 1 Year, To period, Year, from per. 2 year, To Period, Year, I should choose, can some one send me detail reply and solution which may display after this t. code OB52. I also have questin which movement type i should use.
Using T.Code MMPV, i have created new period (from company code 1000, To Company code 1000, period 01, Fiscal Year 1020.
I was reading previous solution, one of them was i should close period 2009. I tried to do this using using MMPV, i entered fiscal year 2009. Error display The specified year 2009 is not the current calender year.
Thanks
Raj

Hi
Hope you are doing this in test server
If this is a real time issue this needs to be addressed by a FI consultant
First see for your company code what is the posting period varient maintained in OBY6
Say if it is 1000
Then in OB52
Maintain a setting like this
1000-S-BLANK-ZZZZZZZZZZ-1--2010122010-13--201016--2010
Then save it
This is for Account type S that is GL accounts
Preferably maintain the same for A, + , D, K, M, V
Regards
Raja

PR not generating for MRP type VB

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for