PR & PO comparision report
Hi All,
I need a report for comparison of PR qty & price with the PO qty & price.
Here i want to compare at service line level.
1. Is there any standard report is there
2. Any function module is there to get all POs with reference to PR.
Regards
Sangram
Hi,
Please check whether the following documents are useful to you,
Regards,
Subha
If found useful, grant me points
Most projects use materials, either valuated or non-valuated. The project information system includes a number of reports you can use to obtain information on, for example, what materials have been used, where, and when.
Features
The project information system includes the following reports on materials:
Material Components
Stock/Requirements
Missing Parts
Pegged Requirements
Order Report
Reservations
Planned Orders
Outline Agreements
Valuated Project Stock
Purchase Requisitions/Purchase Orders
For Project
For Account Assignment
To run them, go to the Project System part of the Easy Access menu and choose Information System ® Material. Then select the report you want.
Similar Messages
-
Price comparision report through transaction ME49
Hi Exports,
I am new in abap report enhancement. I am working as a implementation project, here i have add some more fields and generate report.
Report details:
Transaction ME49-- Price Comparision report
Here i have add one Remarks fields related to Vendor and report will be generated and remarks values will display .
Please helps me and guide me how to do this tasks.
If you have code for this , please send me this mail id: [email protected]
Advance thanks you.
Regards,
JnanaIf you are goint with user exit check
USER EXIT
http://www.sap-img.com/abap/a-short-tutorial-on-user-exits.htm
http://www.sap-img.com/abap/what-is-user-exits.htm
http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/eac/knowledgebaseAnswer/0,295199,sid63_gci982756,00.html
Transaction Code - ME49 Price Comparison List
Exit Name Description
LMEDR001 Enhancements to print program
LMELA002 Adopt batch no. from shipping notification when posting a GR
LMELA010 Inbound shipping notification: Transfer item data from IDOC
LMEQR001 User exit for source determination
LMEXF001 Conditions in Purchasing Documents Without Invoice Receipt
LWSUS001 Customer-Specific Source Determination in Retail
M06B0001 Role determination for purchase requisition release
M06B0002 Changes to comm. structure for purchase requisition release
M06B0003 Number range and document number
M06B0004 Number range and document number
M06B0005 Changes to comm. structure for overall release of requisn.
M06E0004 Changes to communication structure for release purch. doc.
M06E0005 Role determination for release of purchasing documents
ME590001 Grouping of requsitions for PO split in ME59
MEETA001 Define schedule line type (backlog, immed. req., preview)
MEFLD004 Determine earliest delivery date f. check w. GR (only PO)
MELAB001 Gen. forecast delivery schedules: Transfer schedule implem.
MEQUERY1 Enhancement to Document Overview ME21N/ME51N
MEVME001 WE default quantity calc. and over/ underdelivery tolerance
MM06E001 User exits for EDI inbound and outbound purchasing documents
MM06E003 Number range and document number
MM06E004 Control import data screens in purchase order
MM06E005 Customer fields in purchasing document
MM06E007 Change document for requisitions upon conversion into PO
MM06E008 Monitoring of contr. target value in case of release orders
MM06E009 Relevant texts for "Texts exist" indicator
MM06E010 Field selection for vendor address
MMAL0001 ALE source list distribution: Outbound processing
MMAL0002 ALE source list distribution: Inbound processing
MMAL0003 ALE purcasing info record distribution: Outbound processing
MMAL0004 ALE purchasing info record distribution: Inbound processing
MMDA0001 Default delivery addresses
MMFAB001 User exit for generation of release order
MRFLB001 Control Items for Contract Release Order
AMPL0001 User subscreen for additional data on AMPL
No of Exits: 35
Rewards if useful...............
Minal -
Comparision Report between instances
Pls help on how to generate comparision report between instances. We are on 11.5.10 and i have observed that comparision report takes input which is the extract from the same instance. In 11.5.10, is it possible to compare setup data of source and target instances.
Thanks,
ShilpaHi Shilpa,
No, not at all. It does not matter where the extract had come from. Primary/Secondary Data Source LOV would show all the extracts irrespective of the instance.
I hope that you question is all about when you do not have mapping between source and target instances, how do I compare setups? Yes, it is possible.
Download the Extract from target instance and upload it to source instance. Now, you can find the extract in the Primary/Secondary Data Source LOV. -
Hi Experts,
I have created Sales report with Calendar Date prompt (Default date is between 08/01/2010 and 08/15/2010)
My requirement is, in Dashboard I need to place Sales Comparison Report below the Sales report but the Data should be Exact one year before of Default date (i.e.) date is between 08/01/2009 and 08/15/2009)
<font color=red>Note :</font> When I change the date range in prompt the data should change in both Sales report and Sales Comparison report.
Columns are used in report - Center | S.Code | P.Code | Agency | Sum(G.Calls) | Sum(N.Calls) | Sum(Ord.Calls) | Sum(Revenue)
How can I achieve the above.
Thanks,
Balaa...Hello,
you can create a sub report for your second report and have a sstart date and end date column which will give you an year ago dates.
And in your comparision report use the sub report to filter(advanced filter--> based on another report feature)
thanks,
deep -
Hi All,
I am developing a Cost comparision report. I need to display the last manufaturing cost of particular material. Could you please let me know any function module or the relevant tables for this?
Thanks
RakeshHi
Try this BAPI.
BAPI_MATERIAL_GET_DETAIL
Regards,
Abdul -
Hi ! Needed your kind help in running comparision reports in finance module...
I tried runing the balance sheet comparion between two companies being in same server and having same chart of accounts.
when trying to choose other company it is throwing error 'Wrong user name and password' even if the pwds are given correctly..
have any one opened the comparision report?
Kindly help..
Thanks,:0)[Hai Check this SAP notes|https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/smb_searchnotes/display.htm?note_langu=E¬e_numm=0001244096]
-
How to create comparision report's in BEX
Hi
how to create comparision report via BEX
I have object like
TICKERNAME,ROBOTNAME1,ROBOT PARAMETERS1,SALES,PROFIT
vs
TICKERNAME,ROBOTNAME2,ROBOT PARAMETERS2,SALES,PROFIT
-janaHi,
i guess you are trying to compare sales & profit between ROBOTNAME1and ROBOTNAME2, in this case create rectricted key figures (RKF) for ROBOTNAME1 and ROBOTNAME2 and compare RKFs with formula (RKF1 - RKF2)
hope it helps -
Hi All,
Any one Have bom comparision Report to cmpare more than two bom at time because
in statard report(cs14) we compare only two bom at time.
Please send me any report if avialable
Thanks & Regards
ManishHope it will help you.
Reward if help.
REPORT ZMULTIBOM NO STANDARD PAGE HEADING LINE-SIZE 195
LINE-COUNT 60(2) MESSAGE-ID Z1.
TABLES: MBEW, "Material Valuation
MSLB, "Special stocks with vendor
MARA, "Material Master
MAKT, "Material Descriptions
MARD, "Material Master: Storage Location/Batch Segment
MAST, "BOM Header
STKO, "BOM Detail
STPO, "Bom Components
STAS. "BOM Alternative
Text Elements
Plant
SELECT-OPTIONS: S_WERKS FOR MAST-WERKS DEFAULT 'CA',
Material
S_MATNR FOR MAST-MATNR,
Material Type
S_MTART FOR MARA-MTART.
Base Quantity
PARAMETERS: S_BASE TYPE I DEFAULT '1'.
Display up to Level
PARAMETERS: S_LVL TYPE I DEFAULT '99'.
SELECTION-SCREEN SKIP.
Include Vendor Stock
PARAMETERS: X_MSLB AS CHECKBOX.
DATA: W_MATNR LIKE MAPL-MATNR.
DATA: PARENT-MATNR LIKE MAST-MATNR,
CHILD-MATNR LIKE STPO-IDNRK,
CHILD-WERKS LIKE MAST-WERKS,
CHILD-STLAL LIKE MAST-STLAL,
W_MAKTX LIKE MAKT-MAKTX,
W_STD TYPE P DECIMALS 5,
W_MAV TYPE P DECIMALS 5,
W_MENGE TYPE P DECIMALS 3,
W_LEVEL TYPE I,
W_DOT(1),
W_LVL(12),
W_LVL1(12),
W_LVL2(2),
W_COL TYPE I,
W_LFLAG,
W_TTL LIKE MARD-LABST.
DATA: BEGIN OF INT1 OCCURS 50,
LGORT(6),
LABST LIKE MARD-LABST,
END OF INT1.
IF S_BASE EQ 0.
S_BASE = 1.
ENDIF.
append multi level routing
SELECT * FROM MAST WHERE WERKS IN S_WERKS AND
MATNR IN S_MATNR.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM MARA WHERE MATNR = MAST-MATNR AND
MTART IN S_MTART.
IF SY-SUBRC NE 0.
CONTINUE.
ENDIF.
IF MARA-LVORM <> 'X'.
PARENT-MATNR = MAST-MATNR.
CHILD-MATNR = MAST-MATNR.
CHILD-WERKS = MAST-WERKS.
CHILD-STLAL = MAST-STLAL.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM MAKT WHERE MATNR = MAST-MATNR AND
SPRAS = 'E'.
W_MAKTX = MAKT-MAKTX.
REFRESH INT1.
SELECT * FROM MARD WHERE MATNR = MAST-MATNR AND
WERKS = MAST-WERKS AND
LABST NE 0.
MOVE MARD-LGORT TO INT1-LGORT.
MOVE MARD-LABST TO INT1-LABST.
APPEND INT1.
ENDSELECT.
IF X_MSLB EQ 'X'.
SELECT * FROM MSLB WHERE MATNR EQ MAST-MATNR AND
WERKS EQ MAST-WERKS AND
LBLAB NE 0.
MOVE MSLB-LIFNR TO INT1-LGORT.
MOVE MSLB-LBLAB TO INT1-LABST.
APPEND INT1.
ENDSELECT.
ENDIF.
W_LEVEL = 1.
NEW-PAGE.
PERFORM GETCHILD.
ENDIF.
ENDSELECT.
get child parts
FORM GETCHILD.
SELECT * FROM STPO WHERE STLNR = MAST-STLNR
ORDER BY POSNR.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM STKO WHERE STLNR = STPO-STLNR
AND STLAL = MAST-STLAL.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM STAS WHERE STLNR = STPO-STLNR AND
STLKN = STPO-STLKN AND
STLAL = MAST-STLAL.
IF SY-SUBRC EQ 0.
CLEAR: W_DOT, W_LVL, W_LVL1.
PERFORM WRT_DTL.
CHILD-MATNR = STPO-IDNRK.
W_LEVEL = W_LEVEL + 1.
IF W_LEVEL <= S_LVL.
PERFORM SUBCHILD.
ENDIF.
W_LEVEL = W_LEVEL - 1.
ENDIF.
ENDSELECT.
ENDFORM.
get grand children parts
FORM SUBCHILD.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM MAST WHERE MATNR = CHILD-MATNR
AND WERKS = CHILD-WERKS.
IF SY-SUBRC NE 0.
EXIT.
ENDIF.
SELECT * FROM STPO WHERE STLNR = MAST-STLNR
ORDER BY POSNR.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM STKO WHERE STLNR = STPO-STLNR AND
STLAL = MAST-STLAL.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM STAS WHERE STLNR = STPO-STLNR AND
STLKN = STPO-STLKN AND
STLAL = STKO-STLAL.
IF SY-SUBRC EQ 0.
W_DOT = '.'.
PERFORM WRT_DTL.
CHILD-MATNR = STPO-IDNRK.
W_LEVEL = W_LEVEL + 1.
IF W_LEVEL <= S_LVL.
PERFORM SUBCHILD.
ENDIF.
W_LEVEL = W_LEVEL - 1.
SHIFT W_LVL.
ENDIF.
ENDSELECT.
ENDFORM.
TOP-OF-PAGE.
WRITE:/ SY-DATUM,SY-UZEIT,
85 'ABC PTE LTD',
182 'Page', SY-PAGNO.
WRITE: / SY-REPID,
75 'BOM STRUCTURE (WITH LOCATION BALANCES)',
182 SY-UNAME.
SKIP.
CLEAR W_LFLAG.
WRITE:/ 'Material No.:', PARENT-MATNR,
60 'Plant :', MAST-WERKS.
W_COL = 90.
CLEAR W_TTL.
LOOP AT INT1.
IF W_COL > 195.
IF W_LFLAG IS INITIAL.
WRITE:/ 'Description :', W_MAKTX,
60 'Base Qty :', S_BASE LEFT-JUSTIFIED.
W_LFLAG = 'X'.
W_COL = 90.
ELSE.
W_COL = 90.
SKIP.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
WRITE AT W_COL 'Loc :'.
W_COL = W_COL + 6.
WRITE AT W_COL INT1-LGORT.
W_COL = W_COL + 7.
WRITE AT W_COL(12) INT1-LABST LEFT-JUSTIFIED.
W_COL = W_COL + 16.
W_TTL = W_TTL + INT1-LABST.
ENDLOOP.
IF W_LFLAG IS INITIAL.
WRITE:/ 'Description :', W_MAKTX,
60 'Base Qty :', S_BASE LEFT-JUSTIFIED,
90 'Total :', W_TTL LEFT-JUSTIFIED.
ELSE.
WRITE AT W_COL 'Total :'.
W_COL = W_COL + 8.
WRITE AT W_COL W_TTL LEFT-JUSTIFIED.
ENDIF.
SKIP.
ULINE.
WRITE: /001 'Level',
011 'Item',
017 'Component',
037 'Description',
079 ' Per',
089 'UOM',
094 ' Std Price',
106 'Moving Avg',
119 'Location',
128 ' Balance',
139 'Location',
148 ' Balance',
159 'Location',
168 ' Balance',
179 'Total Quantity'.
ULINE.
FORM WRT_DTL.
CLEAR: MAKT-MAKTX, W_MAV, W_STD.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM MAKT WHERE MATNR = STPO-IDNRK AND
SPRAS = 'E'.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM MBEW WHERE MATNR = STPO-IDNRK AND
BWKEY = MAST-WERKS.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
W_MAV = MBEW-VERPR / MBEW-PEINH.
W_STD = MBEW-STPRS / MBEW-PEINH.
ENDIF.
W_MENGE = ( STPO-MENGE / STKO-BMENG ) * S_BASE.
W_LVL2 = W_LEVEL.
CONCATENATE W_DOT W_LVL INTO W_LVL.
CONCATENATE W_LVL W_LVL2 INTO W_LVL1.
WRITE: /001 W_LVL1,
011 STPO-POSNR,
017 STPO-IDNRK,
037 MAKT-MAKTX,
079(8) W_MENGE,
089 STPO-MEINS,
094(10) W_STD,
106(10) W_MAV.
W_COL = 119.
CLEAR W_TTL.
SELECT * FROM MARD WHERE MATNR = STPO-IDNRK AND
WERKS = MAST-WERKS AND
LABST NE 0.
IF W_COL > 166.
W_COL = 119.
WRITE AT /W_COL ' '.
ENDIF.
WRITE AT W_COL MARD-LGORT.
W_COL = W_COL + 5.
WRITE AT W_COL(13) MARD-LABST.
W_COL = W_COL + 15.
W_TTL = W_TTL + MARD-LABST.
ENDSELECT.
IF X_MSLB EQ 'X'.
SELECT * FROM MSLB WHERE MATNR = STPO-IDNRK AND
WERKS = MAST-WERKS AND
LBLAB NE 0.
IF W_COL > 166.
W_COL = 119.
WRITE AT /W_COL ' '.
ENDIF.
WRITE AT W_COL(6) MSLB-LIFNR.
W_COL = W_COL + 6.
WRITE AT W_COL(12) MSLB-LBLAB.
W_COL = W_COL + 14.
W_TTL = W_TTL + MSLB-LBLAB.
ENDSELECT.
ENDIF.
WRITE AT 179(15) W_TTL.
ENDFORM. -
Actual-Actual comparision report but for arbitrary period
Hi.
Is it possible to create report in Report Painter "Actual-Actual comparision" but for any arbitrary period selected on the first selection screen?
In standard we have report for quarterly comparision but the periods are fixed.
How can I have 2 arbitrary period for comparision?
Thanks in advance.Hi
I can give you some pointers...
Go to GRR3 - Copy the report 1SIP-001 under Library 1VK
Copy the Actual Column in that report to another column and delete the Plan column
remove the Field GJAHR (Fiscal Year) & PERIOD from Edit > General data selections
Include these 2 fields in the 2 Columns... Specify a variable for both of them and the variables must be diff in each column
while executing your report, you can enter the desired period
br, Ajay M -
Project wise cost comparision report
Hi Gurus,
Is there any report which include different cost i.e Budgeted value, actual value, actual revenue for projects (all wbs) executed in perticular time period.
If i want to customize report which table and field required for the same pls provide me details for that.
Regards
VJHi
Check CN41 report with project definition- execute it - then press F5 (or click choose fields) - to choose actual value, budget and other plan costs. Alternatively check S_alr_87013542 report also.
thanks -
Projrct wise different cost comparision report
Hi Gurus,
Is there any report which include different cost i.e Budgeted value, actual value, actual revenue for projects (all wbs) executed in perticular time period.
If i want to customize report which table and field required for the same pls provide me details for that.
Regards
VJ
Edited by: vrunda on May 26, 2009 1:29 PMHi,
check following reports
S_ALR_87013557 - Budget/Actual/Variance
S_ALR_87013564 - Plan Revenue/Actual Revanue/Variance
CJI3 - Actual Costs/Revenues
tables
RPSCO Project Info Database (cost, revenues)
BPGE Budget: Overall Values
BPJA Budget: Annual Values
Regards,
Sandeep -
Report for actual/planed sales
hi everyone,
I am ravi working as sap bw consultant
can any one explain the step by step procedure to create a report to get
actual/planed sales per month and per year.
And also some real time errors and how to rectify them. please
help me in this regard.
Thanks all,
raviHai,
Ravi,
You create one cube for plan data and create another cube for actual data.
Create a multiprovider and give comparision report. this is betterway.
Or you can also load actual and plan data in one cube but you need to maintain one character like version to seperate atual and plan data.(OR)
Create a basic cube and transaction cube.Go to the transaaction cube Rght click on the cube select the Switch on the traction cube you get 2 radio buttons where u can load and planning on the cube .When u select on planing u can't load the data but wen u select the Load Radio button u load the data and compare with basic cube.To be presice it is the concept of BPS(Business Planning Simulation) part of SEM.
Thanks,
Subramanyeswar rao -
Problem while running the Profit center Plan/Actual Report in Background
Hi
While executing the T.Code s_alr_87009722 (Profit Centre plan/Actual Comparision Report) on fourground it is giving all the profit centers/groups in the particular profit center group. But when i run the same report in back ground mode it is picking only the last profit center in that group. Please help me regarding the same.
Regards
Suryahi prakash ramu,
even it is not working. it is directly talking me to spool request..
i think it is not possible, while ur running the report in background.,
any how if possible could u pls send me the code...
thanks
ramu -
Log file sync top event during performance test -av 36ms
Hi,
During the performance test for our product before deployment into product i see "log file sync" on top with Avg wait (ms) being 36 which i feel is too high.
Avg
wait % DB
Event Waits Time(s) (ms) time Wait Class
log file sync 208,327 7,406 36 46.6 Commit
direct path write 646,833 3,604 6 22.7 User I/O
DB CPU 1,599 10.1
direct path read temp 1,321,596 619 0 3.9 User I/O
log buffer space 4,161 558 134 3.5 ConfiguratAlthough testers are not complaining about the performance of the appplication , we ,DBAs, are expected to be proactive about the any bad signals from DB.
I am not able to figure out why "log file sync" is having such slow response.
Below is the snapshot from the load profile.
Snap Id Snap Time Sessions Curs/Sess
Begin Snap: 108127 16-May-13 20:15:22 105 6.5
End Snap: 108140 16-May-13 23:30:29 156 8.9
Elapsed: 195.11 (mins)
DB Time: 265.09 (mins)
Cache Sizes Begin End
~~~~~~~~~~~ ---------- ----------
Buffer Cache: 1,168M 1,136M Std Block Size: 8K
Shared Pool Size: 1,120M 1,168M Log Buffer: 16,640K
Load Profile Per Second Per Transaction Per Exec Per Call
~~~~~~~~~~~~ --------------- --------------- ---------- ----------
DB Time(s): 1.4 0.1 0.02 0.01
DB CPU(s): 0.1 0.0 0.00 0.00
Redo size: 607,512.1 33,092.1
Logical reads: 3,900.4 212.5
Block changes: 1,381.4 75.3
Physical reads: 134.5 7.3
Physical writes: 134.0 7.3
User calls: 145.5 7.9
Parses: 24.6 1.3
Hard parses: 7.9 0.4
W/A MB processed: 915,418.7 49,864.2
Logons: 0.1 0.0
Executes: 85.2 4.6
Rollbacks: 0.0 0.0
Transactions: 18.4Some of the top background wait events:
^LBackground Wait Events DB/Inst: Snaps: 108127-108140
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
-> Only events with Total Wait Time (s) >= .001 are shown
-> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
Avg
%Time Total Wait wait Waits % bg
Event Waits -outs Time (s) (ms) /txn time
log file parallel write 208,563 0 2,528 12 1.0 66.4
db file parallel write 4,264 0 785 184 0.0 20.6
Backup: sbtbackup 1 0 516 516177 0.0 13.6
control file parallel writ 4,436 0 97 22 0.0 2.6
log file sequential read 6,922 0 95 14 0.0 2.5
Log archive I/O 6,820 0 48 7 0.0 1.3
os thread startup 432 0 26 60 0.0 .7
Backup: sbtclose2 1 0 10 10094 0.0 .3
db file sequential read 2,585 0 8 3 0.0 .2
db file single write 560 0 3 6 0.0 .1
log file sync 28 0 1 53 0.0 .0
control file sequential re 36,326 0 1 0 0.2 .0
log file switch completion 4 0 1 207 0.0 .0
buffer busy waits 5 0 1 116 0.0 .0
LGWR wait for redo copy 924 0 1 1 0.0 .0
log file single write 56 0 1 9 0.0 .0
Backup: sbtinfo2 1 0 1 500 0.0 .0During a previous perf test , things didnt look this bad for "log file sync. Few sections from the comparision report(awrddprt.sql)
{code}
Workload Comparison
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1st Per Sec 2nd Per Sec %Diff 1st Per Txn 2nd Per Txn %Diff
DB time: 0.78 1.36 74.36 0.02 0.07 250.00
CPU time: 0.18 0.14 -22.22 0.00 0.01 100.00
Redo size: 573,678.11 607,512.05 5.90 15,101.84 33,092.08 119.13
Logical reads: 4,374.04 3,900.38 -10.83 115.14 212.46 84.52
Block changes: 1,593.38 1,381.41 -13.30 41.95 75.25 79.38
Physical reads: 76.44 134.54 76.01 2.01 7.33 264.68
Physical writes: 110.43 134.00 21.34 2.91 7.30 150.86
User calls: 197.62 145.46 -26.39 5.20 7.92 52.31
Parses: 7.28 24.55 237.23 0.19 1.34 605.26
Hard parses: 0.00 7.88 100.00 0.00 0.43 100.00
Sorts: 3.88 4.90 26.29 0.10 0.27 170.00
Logons: 0.09 0.08 -11.11 0.00 0.00 0.00
Executes: 126.69 85.19 -32.76 3.34 4.64 38.92
Transactions: 37.99 18.36 -51.67
First Second Diff
1st 2nd
Event Wait Class Waits Time(s) Avg Time(ms) %DB time Event Wait Class Waits Time(s) Avg Time
(ms) %DB time
SQL*Net more data from client Network 2,133,486 1,270.7 0.6 61.24 log file sync Commit 208,355 7,407.6
35.6 46.57
CPU time N/A 487.1 N/A 23.48 direct path write User I/O 646,849 3,604.7
5.6 22.66
log file sync Commit 99,459 129.5 1.3 6.24 log file parallel write System I/O 208,564 2,528.4
12.1 15.90
log file parallel write System I/O 100,732 126.6 1.3 6.10 CPU time N/A 1,599.3
N/A 10.06
SQL*Net more data to client Network 451,810 103.1 0.2 4.97 db file parallel write System I/O 4,264 784.7 1
84.0 4.93
-direct path write User I/O 121,044 52.5 0.4 2.53 -SQL*Net more data from client Network 7,407,435 279.7
0.0 1.76
-db file parallel write System I/O 986 22.8 23.1 1.10 -SQL*Net more data to client Network 2,714,916 64.6
0.0 0.41
{code}
*To sum it sup:
1. Why is the IO response getting such an hit during the new perf test? Please suggest*
2. Does the number of DB writer impact "log file sync" wait event? We have only one DB writer as the number of cpu on the host is only 4
{code}
select *from v$version;
BANNER
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64bit Production
PL/SQL Release 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
CORE 11.1.0.7.0 Production
TNS for HPUX: Version 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
{code}
Please let me know if you would like to see any other stats.
Edited by: Kunwar on May 18, 2013 2:20 PM1. A snapshot interval of 3 hours always generates meaningless results
Below are some details from the 1 hour interval AWR report.
Platform CPUs Cores Sockets Memory(GB)
HP-UX IA (64-bit) 4 4 3 31.95
Snap Id Snap Time Sessions Curs/Sess
Begin Snap: 108129 16-May-13 20:45:32 140 8.0
End Snap: 108133 16-May-13 21:45:53 150 8.8
Elapsed: 60.35 (mins)
DB Time: 140.49 (mins)
Cache Sizes Begin End
~~~~~~~~~~~ ---------- ----------
Buffer Cache: 1,168M 1,168M Std Block Size: 8K
Shared Pool Size: 1,120M 1,120M Log Buffer: 16,640K
Load Profile Per Second Per Transaction Per Exec Per Call
~~~~~~~~~~~~ --------------- --------------- ---------- ----------
DB Time(s): 2.3 0.1 0.03 0.01
DB CPU(s): 0.1 0.0 0.00 0.00
Redo size: 719,553.5 34,374.6
Logical reads: 4,017.4 191.9
Block changes: 1,521.1 72.7
Physical reads: 136.9 6.5
Physical writes: 158.3 7.6
User calls: 167.0 8.0
Parses: 25.8 1.2
Hard parses: 8.9 0.4
W/A MB processed: 406,220.0 19,406.0
Logons: 0.1 0.0
Executes: 88.4 4.2
Rollbacks: 0.0 0.0
Transactions: 20.9
Top 5 Timed Foreground Events
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Avg
wait % DB
Event Waits Time(s) (ms) time Wait Class
log file sync 73,761 6,740 91 80.0 Commit
log buffer space 3,581 541 151 6.4 Configurat
DB CPU 348 4.1
direct path write 238,962 241 1 2.9 User I/O
direct path read temp 487,874 174 0 2.1 User I/O
Background Wait Events DB/Inst: Snaps: 108129-108133
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
-> Only events with Total Wait Time (s) >= .001 are shown
-> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
Avg
%Time Total Wait wait Waits % bg
Event Waits -outs Time (s) (ms) /txn time
log file parallel write 61,049 0 1,891 31 0.8 87.8
db file parallel write 1,590 0 251 158 0.0 11.6
control file parallel writ 1,372 0 56 41 0.0 2.6
log file sequential read 2,473 0 50 20 0.0 2.3
Log archive I/O 2,436 0 20 8 0.0 .9
os thread startup 135 0 8 60 0.0 .4
db file sequential read 668 0 4 6 0.0 .2
db file single write 200 0 2 9 0.0 .1
log file sync 8 0 1 152 0.0 .1
log file single write 20 0 0 21 0.0 .0
control file sequential re 11,218 0 0 0 0.1 .0
buffer busy waits 2 0 0 161 0.0 .0
direct path write 6 0 0 37 0.0 .0
LGWR wait for redo copy 380 0 0 0 0.0 .0
log buffer space 1 0 0 89 0.0 .0
latch: cache buffers lru c 3 0 0 1 0.0 .0 2 The log file sync is a result of commit --> you are committing too often, maybe even every individual record.
Thanks for explanation. +Actually my question is WHY is it so slow (avg wait of 91ms)+3 Your IO subsystem hosting the online redo log files can be a limiting factor.
We don't know anything about your online redo log configuration
Below is my redo log configuration.
GROUP# STATUS TYPE MEMBER IS_
1 ONLINE /oradata/fs01/PERFDB1/redo_1a.log NO
1 ONLINE /oradata/fs02/PERFDB1/redo_1b.log NO
2 ONLINE /oradata/fs01/PERFDB1/redo_2a.log NO
2 ONLINE /oradata/fs02/PERFDB1/redo_2b.log NO
3 ONLINE /oradata/fs01/PERFDB1/redo_3a.log NO
3 ONLINE /oradata/fs02/PERFDB1/redo_3b.log NO
6 rows selected.
04:13:14 perf_monitor@PERFDB1> col FIRST_CHANGE# for 999999999999999999
04:13:26 perf_monitor@PERFDB1> select *from v$log;
GROUP# THREAD# SEQUENCE# BYTES MEMBERS ARC STATUS FIRST_CHANGE# FIRST_TIME
1 1 40689 524288000 2 YES INACTIVE 13026185905545 18-MAY-13 01:00
2 1 40690 524288000 2 YES INACTIVE 13026185931010 18-MAY-13 03:32
3 1 40691 524288000 2 NO CURRENT 13026185933550 18-MAY-13 04:00Edited by: Kunwar on May 18, 2013 2:46 PM -
Display of characters in list restricted
In my vendor comparision report i want to display my vendor details side by side so i want to draw a very biig line .actually im copying standard program of me49 and trying to change it .in tht im trying to draw a a line of 300 char in normal programs its accepting line uline at / (300).but in this program b4 drawing a line im assigning length = 300. uline at / (300) even then its drawing a line of 144. is tht program having any restriction of characters diaplaying on list or wat to do for this.
Edited by: ashwini gangam on Sep 17, 2009 12:12 PMAshwini,
I think you've posted this into the wrong forum!
-Anil
Maybe you are looking for
-
How to Get xml Attribute value from a given xpath
i'm building an xml from 3 columns a,b,c using 'SELECT EXTRACT (XMLELEMENT ("ROOT",.........)' and my xml looks something like this <ROOT> <categories> <catogory value="col a value" display="true"/> <catogory value="col b value" display="false"/> <ca
-
Hi All, Can someone let me know the whole process of FI Configurations? (till AR/AP configuration) (with all the Tcodes) Points will be awarded, accordingly. Thanks & Regards Neeraj Manocha
-
Hi We've been struggling with this issue for a while and were wondering if anyone has had similar exp's. reading this group and other weblogic ones I see that entity bean instance counts have been(sic) causing problems however we are having similar p
-
@Interceptors annotations don't work in method defined in generic classes
Hello, I try to port a JBoss application to Weblogic 10.3 but I have a problem: I have a generic dao which is inherited in a hundred of EJB3 session stateless. @Interceptors defined in methods in this abstract class are not called while it works very
-
Touch Screen Or Software Problum
I have had my iPhone for 2 weeks and have had no issues.... until last night. When its in stand by i hit the button and i slide to unlock - 50% of the time i get a black screen with no icons or i get the icons but when i touch the screen i get nothin