PR Value Should come to PO.!!
Hello,
PR Value Should come to PO.
I Know that....the PR Value never copied to PO, bcz in PO the value come from Inforecord.
But scenario is like that..
While Procurement of Capital materials..Boss is giving the Only 2500Rs. We had created the
PR for 2500Rs.
Suppose while creating the PO with ref to PR. system atleast give us the warning or error
message that" the PO value is more than the PR value" then only the user will come to know
PR value is less....
How we will excecute it?
Regards
Sapman man
Hi
If u enter price in PR the same will be coming in to PO.
Just try by doing some setting in SPRO - MM - Purchaing - Env Data - Def Attri System Msg - Sys Msg - In that screen just press F4 in the "Number" column.
In this chk 06 - 456 & 06 - 494 if these 2 suits ur requirement just add the same by new entries in ur earlier screen.
Also u can define it by giving error or warning msg in the same screen
Regards
Ram
Similar Messages
-
Field value should come Automatically
Hi Experts..
I hav a requirement,
In transaction QA32 -> Usage Decision(UD) -> Inspection Lot Tab (Program SAPMQEVA 0102) -> In this screen Storage Location Field (screen field : RQEVA-QLGO_VM01 ) should come Automatically .
Logic :based MATNR value It will Pick the Corresponding LGFSB Value from MARC Table
how to resolve this Issue ??
Pls help me out
Thanks in Advance
SatyaHi
In User Exit QEVA0006 i hav to add the logic...
FM : EXIT_SAPMQEVA_006 .
Include : INCLUDE ZXQEVU07.
can u please help me out in writing code that Include Program ?? What to write in Importing and Exporting Parameters ??
Thanks in Advance
Satya -
Column value should come as comma separated
I have the requirement like this:
Data coming up as( In Deski):
Name ID Sale value Flag
A 1 500 A1
A 1 500 A2
A 1 500 A3
and Required is:
A 1 500 A1,A2,A3
Please suggest any solution.
Thanks in advanceNeha,
Though this requirment is being requested for sometime now but not been addressed; I was able to search and find this for you:-
Lets say we are dealing with only two objects with data as below:-
Date | Code
2/1/09 | 23
2/1/09 | 22
3/1/09 | 22
The two universe objects that are pulled into the query are: [Date] and [Code]
We will create 4 measure object within the report to achieve this:
1. Create an object called Maximum using the function below:
=Max ([Code]) In ([Date])
2. Create a concatenated object called Object 1 using the formula below:
= [Code]" , "Previous(Self)
3. Create another measure object called Object 2 using the formula below:
=[Object 1] Where ([Code]=[Maximum])
4. Finally create an object called Code(s) as below:
=If (IsNull(Previous([Object 2]));Substr([Object 2];1;(Length([Object 2])-3));
(Substr([Object 2];1;(Pos([Object 2];Previous([Object 2]))-4))))
Even when you don't have a measure object it works on characteristics too.
Best Luck!!!
Cheers. -
Sorting: char should come first
Hi
I have a field which has both number and char data types.
SELECT id FROM test1 ORDER BY id
ID
1
5
8
A
D
X
I want that char values should come first and then numeric. This should be in ascending order. Is it possible in a simple way?
Regards,
Danish
Message was edited by:
DanishSQL> select c1 from test
2 order by decode(regexp_replace(c1,'\d+'),null,1,0),c1;
C1
A
O
1
5 -
Re: Whence should come the frameworks?
At 03:44 PM 6/20/98 +0200, Daniel Nguyen wrote (on the polymorphic
polymorphism thread:
Is it a battle between Forte and Sage ?One hopes not, but this reminds me of an interesting question that I would
like to throw out for comment. With any product like Forte, any given
release can only cover so much. Some of what it does not include is core
infrastructure and for that one has simply to work around or wait. But,
there is also a lot which it does not cover which is within the scope of
others to provide. This is particularly apparent in the case of Express
and Conductor where one can clearly extend that which comes from Forte or,
to be more extreme, one can offer an alternative, especially in the case of
Express.
These extensions and alternatives are really a necessary part of getting
work done, but for those with a mind to it, they also present a business
opportunity, either for direct sale to other Forte shops or as a part of
the value-add in a consulting agreement. But, as one moves on to
subsequent releases, there is a natural tension which arises because Forte
is likely to incorporate some of these same extensions into the product.
E.g., various frameworks have provided security components, but R4 will
have its own security component. Forte is also likely to provide
extensions to Express which are not already in a competing framework and
users of that framework will then not benefit automatically by that
extension unless the framework provider works to include the extension as
well.
My impression, correct or not, is that most framework providers are
offering their products as alternatives to Express and, as such, are
essentially competing with future versions of Express. I.e., in the
current release, one can argue that the competing framework is a better
foundation, but if future versions of Express make substantial strides, as
seems to be the expectation, then the providers of that framework have the
difficult task of making equal or greater strides in order for it to
continue to be the case that their offering is still arguably better.
At least one company, DS Data, has taken the alternate position of layering
their products on Express and Conductor. This would seem to put their
users in a somewhat better growth position since future extensions to
Express should be fairly easily incorporated, either by replacing the
previously external component or simply by being added to what is
available. One might argue that this graceful growth potential has been
achieved at the compromise of having to accept the Express and Conductor
foundations as given, but the importance of this is something we each will
have to judge for ourselves. But, even DS Data has the risk that Express
and/or will advance so rapidly as to take over all of the added features
and functionality now provided by their extensions. Their customers should
be OK since this will simply that the extensions are subsumed into the
core, but it does mean that they either lose a product in the future or
have the challenging task of continuing to stay meaningfully ahead.
It seems clear that the more that comes from Forte itself, the more the
Forte community as a whole benefits so I would hope that no one would
advocate that Forte curtail its framework development in order to leave
that market open for the partners. But, if Forte does proceed agressively
on framework development, then, to some extent, it is competing with
partners that provide frameworks. Moreover, as partners do create core
functionality like frameworks, they are creating things which would benefit
the Forte community as a whole, but they cannot expect the whole community
to purchase their framework. I.e., Company X may have some piece of their
framework which is particularly useful, but Company Y has something else
and neither are integrated with Express which one may have chosen if for no
other reason than to stay in optimal tune with what Forte is doing. As
things stand, unless these pieces can be componentialized and the companies
involved are willing to offer them as such as separate products, the only
way the Express user has of getting this functionality is to develop it
themselves or wait for Forte to add it to Express.
What I would like to ask, then, is what people think of what it is that
Forte could do to make this overall structure work better? Not that I see
it as working badly, especially compared to some other environments that I
have seen, but just that there are some real problems without obvious easy
answers.
=========================================================================
Thomas Mercer-Hursh, Ph.D email: [email protected]
Computing Integrity, Inc. sales: 510-233-9329
550 Casey Drive - Cypress Point support: 510-233-9327
Point Richmond, CA 94801-3751 fax: 510-233-6950
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>Thomas,
I think you have brought up a really good question and one that deserves
some attention by all:
customers, partners and Forte. The advent of third-party tools for the
Forte marketplace is an interesting prospect. If I take my companies
product (SCAFFOLDS), the original impetus for building such a thing, was not
to offer an alternative to Forte Express, but to offer an alternative to
building applications with raw Forte. And as such, we have not targeted,
feature compared or analyzed Forte Express to help build or sell any part of
our product.
I think the reason for this is that many of us in the framework business do
not see ourselves as having a competing product to Forte Express. The
reason for this is that we have taken on applications with our products that
Forte themselves would not pitch Express at. The architectural descriptions
in SCAFFOLDS have been used to do everything from simple to very complex GUI
development to Database persistence or communications to satellites.
Because of this, there is some overlap of functionality, but certainly we
see Forte Express being used for a much more limited class of application.
I would question the assertion that it is good for Forte to build more. I
think Forte, like any company, has a limited amount of engineering muscle.
With this muscle they should be concentrating on their core products that
make the company profitable. If I look at their product line-up, clearly
the Forte Development Tool is the make or break product. They should rely
more on the marketplace to provide solutions for things that are outside of
their core products. I sort of take the opposite tact. It seems clear that
the more a third party marketplace finds outlets for their solutions the
more diverse solutions we are likely find in that marketplace. As an
example, if you look at the Visual Basic marketplace, clearly it is big with
many, many solutions because Microsoft defined some specs for add in
components and let the marketplace provide solutions.
I think Forte could spend more time opening up their tool for additions by
third-party vendors. For example, things like object introspection, an open
repository and dynamically adding widget types would do wonders for the
number and kinds of solutions that would exist in the Forte marketplace
today if this was done a version or two ago. Instead, I think Forte spent
much of their engineering muscle on other kinds of products, like Forte
Express. Whether this strategy will pay of for them remains to be seen, but
certainly if they enter the Java world, they will have to change their
current strategy with regard to support to third-party solutions. The Java
marketplace is very diverse today and Forte will have to allow more
third-party integration to be taken seriously in that market.
Mark Perreira
Sage IT Partners.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[<a href="mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]]On</a> Behalf Of Thomas Mercer-Hursh,
Ph.D.
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 1998 11:19 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Whence should come the frameworks?
At 03:44 PM 6/20/98 +0200, Daniel Nguyen wrote (on the polymorphic
polymorphism thread:
Is it a battle between Forte and Sage ?One hopes not, but this reminds me of an interesting question that I would
like to throw out for comment. With any product like Forte, any given
release can only cover so much. Some of what it does not include is core
infrastructure and for that one has simply to work around or wait. But,
there is also a lot which it does not cover which is within the scope of
others to provide. This is particularly apparent in the case of Express
and Conductor where one can clearly extend that which comes from Forte or,
to be more extreme, one can offer an alternative, especially in
the case of
Express.
These extensions and alternatives are really a necessary part of getting
work done, but for those with a mind to it, they also present a business
opportunity, either for direct sale to other Forte shops or as a part of
the value-add in a consulting agreement. But, as one moves on to
subsequent releases, there is a natural tension which arises because Forte
is likely to incorporate some of these same extensions into the product.
E.g., various frameworks have provided security components, but R4 will
have its own security component. Forte is also likely to provide
extensions to Express which are not already in a competing framework and
users of that framework will then not benefit automatically by that
extension unless the framework provider works to include the extension as
well.
My impression, correct or not, is that most framework providers are
offering their products as alternatives to Express and, as such, are
essentially competing with future versions of Express. I.e., in the
current release, one can argue that the competing framework is a better
foundation, but if future versions of Express make substantial strides, as
seems to be the expectation, then the providers of that framework have the
difficult task of making equal or greater strides in order for it to
continue to be the case that their offering is still arguably better.
At least one company, DS Data, has taken the alternate position
of layering
their products on Express and Conductor. This would seem to put their
users in a somewhat better growth position since future extensions to
Express should be fairly easily incorporated, either by replacing the
previously external component or simply by being added to what is
available. One might argue that this graceful growth potential has been
achieved at the compromise of having to accept the Express and Conductor
foundations as given, but the importance of this is something we each will
have to judge for ourselves. But, even DS Data has the risk that Express
and/or will advance so rapidly as to take over all of the added features
and functionality now provided by their extensions. Their
customers should
be OK since this will simply that the extensions are subsumed into the
core, but it does mean that they either lose a product in the future or
have the challenging task of continuing to stay meaningfully ahead.
It seems clear that the more that comes from Forte itself, the more the
Forte community as a whole benefits so I would hope that no one would
advocate that Forte curtail its framework development in order to leave
that market open for the partners. But, if Forte does proceed agressively
on framework development, then, to some extent, it is competing with
partners that provide frameworks. Moreover, as partners do create core
functionality like frameworks, they are creating things which
would benefit
the Forte community as a whole, but they cannot expect the whole community
to purchase their framework. I.e., Company X may have some piece of their
framework which is particularly useful, but Company Y has something else
and neither are integrated with Express which one may have chosen
if for no
other reason than to stay in optimal tune with what Forte is doing. As
things stand, unless these pieces can be componentialized and the
companies
involved are willing to offer them as such as separate products, the only
way the Express user has of getting this functionality is to develop it
themselves or wait for Forte to add it to Express.
What I would like to ask, then, is what people think of what it is that
Forte could do to make this overall structure work better? Not that I see
it as working badly, especially compared to some other environments that I
have seen, but just that there are some real problems without obvious easy
answers.
=========================================================================
Thomas Mercer-Hursh, Ph.D email: [email protected]
Computing Integrity, Inc. sales: 510-233-9329
550 Casey Drive - Cypress Point support: 510-233-9327
Point Richmond, CA 94801-3751 fax: 510-233-6950
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
"http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>
>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
"http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>> -
INR should come on the top , not in every row...
Dear Experts,
I am facing an onother issue. The issue seems very simple but a m nt able to solve it.
In service report ,
Net Income
540,000.00 INR
243,000.00 INR
But in Sales Report,
Net Sales
INR
3,718,710.31
16,057,490.72
In above service report the data should come like the Sales Report. I am able to change it only for my system, but i am not able to do it Globally.
In the report , Net Income --> Right click --> properties --> Display --> Display scaling factors for key figures..
In such a way I am getting the value like ,
Net Income
INR
540,000.00
243,000.00
But the problem is , its not applicable for the global users.
Please put some light .
Thanks,
SanjanaHi Chandu,
If I change in the following way :
In the report , Net Income --> Right click --> properties --> Display --> Display scaling factors for key figures..
For that time I am able to see the report like
Net Income
INR
540,000.00
243,000.00
But If I start after putting transaction RRMX , then its showing like ,
Net Income
540,000.00 INR
243,000.00 INR
This means its not getting stored . What should I do ?
Please put some light .
Thanks,
Sanjana -
Updated record should come in txt file
Hi Friends,
My requirements like this way, any changes make in mara, mard, mbew, makt, vbak, vbap, vbrk and abrp table. that newly created data should come in .txt file of application server.
I have already developed a program for that. it is downloading data in every 3 hours slots. it is running in background. whatever changes made during these hours it will download.
now, my requirement has been changed, instance data should come in .txt file of app server. e.g. when newly created record save in database table, same time that record should come in .txt file with proper format.
is it possible? please let me know.
Thanks in advance,
ParagHi Parag,
To obtain changes you know you can get the details from the tables CDHDR and CDPOS.
Also you have questions about performance and so. SO here are some details.
- When you flag a data element for change document (is checked) it is ONLY a marker that allows for registration of this field's changes into CDHDR and CDPOS. The actual control is done on datafile level in its technical settings (Transaction SE11 with datafile name and then push button "Technical Settings" or CtrlShiftF9). Herein you will find a flag "Log data changes".
Within the CDHDR file and CDPOS file a field OBJECTCLAS is used. Only for existing OBJECTCLAS values the changes are logged.
- Now obvious this is the trick for standard SAP (as Subramanian has already pointed out you can find "OBJECTCLAS" values with transaction SCDO). If you want to know on how to create your own "OBJECTCLAS" values with working logging on your own designed fields follow Subramanian suggestion and read the documentation.
Now to your questions:
You gave some tables you need to track changes (and now also for initial creation) like MARA, MARD, MAKT and others.
To get changes for these tables use the following "OBJECTCLAS" values:
- MATERIAL (Tables MARA, MARC, MARD, MBEW, MFHM, MLGN, MLGT, MPGD, MPOP and MVKE). By-the-way, this object will be replaced by MATERIAL_N (available from release 4.6x).
- VERKBELEG (Tables VBAK, VBAP, VBEP, VBKD, VBLB, VBPA, VBPA2 and VBUK).
To collect changes (suggested by Andreas) you could use function module CHANGEDOCUMENT_READ. This is very usefull if also archiving is active for the objects you need to track changes for and your changes are scattered through time, but for your problem it is better to approach the log data directly.
1. First select the main change documents from CDHDR table for a given "OBJECTCLAS" and "OBJECTID". Here you can use additional filtering on DATE (field UDATE) and TIME (field (UTIME). Even filtering on a specific transaction is possible (field TCODE).
This gives you a number of change documents (field CHANGENR).
2a. Secondly select the specific field changes from table CDPOS by using the found fields from CDHDR and additionally fill TABNAME with the specific table and if required FNAME with the specific field name. 2b. Since in your case the values will not be known, you need to track changes, you have to be very carefull in your selections. If you track the object MATERIAL or MATERIAL_N, you best loop over the MARA table and for each MATNR fill the OBJECTID field of CDHDR with this MATNR value.
3. In order to find NEWLY created items you need to check the CHANGE_IND flag. When 'I' it is an new insert, when 'U' it is an update. Now this rule applies ONLY to key fields, since SAP first creates the key record (CHANGE_IND = 'I') and then the other fields (CHANGE_IND = 'U').
Finally the warning given by Andreas (runtime increases - you MUST select with OBJECTCLAS and OBJECTID) is very important. Not supplying OBJECTID will have a very heavy impact on the runtime.
Hope this gives you some clues on how to approach your problem.
Regards,
Rob. -
Purchase Org, Company code bydefault should come
Hi Friends,
Here the client wants the company code and purchasing Organisation should be bydefault at the time of PO/PR creation stage. Here we have 4 company codes and 4 purchasing organisations available in the server. For a specific company code, the users demand that for them their Company code and Purchasing Organization should come as bydefault when they create PO or PR.
Please advice how to do the settings so that the users should not select these 2 fields at the time of PO/PR creation.
Thanks & Regards
SatyaHello Satyabrata,
In ME21n/ME51n goto Personal settings tab in that choose Default Values where we can enter CoCode, Purch.Org, & Purch group & save it.
So whenever PO or PR is created the default values will be what we entered in the personal settings.
I think this will be helpful if so pls reward.
Rgds,
Bala. -
Hi
I hv a PR with Matl.. In the PR they hv specified a price for the PR.. (in valuation filed)
Am creating a PO with ref to PR and i need the PR value should want to come to PO automatically..
Whr can i set this?
VijayHi,
1. Go to SPRO > MM > Purchasing > Authorization Management > Define Function Authorizations for Buyers > Function Authorizations: Purchase Order > Here "New Entries" and define Function Authorization Key as "01" and give description.
OR use T. Code - OMET
Here under "General parameters" subscreen, cctivate "Adopt PO Price" indicator and select "Enter conditions"
In "Possible ref. objects", select "W/o reference" otherwise reference documents (for e.g. PR, RFQ, etc...) for PO creation will become mandatory.
2. Now go to SU01 > Enter User ID > Parameters Tab > Here for Parameter ID EFB i.e. Function Authorization: Purchase Order, maintain value "01" and check in PO, PR will become mandatory for that user.
3. Now during creation of PR in ME51N, under "Valuation" Tab, you will get option for PO Price Adoption as Net or Gross. Select as per your requirement and it will copy Price to PO. -
In report value are comming but itz a old one but we required new one
hello expert ,
I am developing a report related to payroll , one field desiznation of employee field value are comming but itz a old one . ie if any employee got promotion , it dosn't showing updated field . i checked pa30 for this employee . there is two designation one is old one and another is new one . so itz pic the value old one
Thanks
AdityaHi,
When you are capturing the designation from the table , you should always check for begda and endda in the table , Also if you pick the record where begda = '99991231' then , I think you can able to pickup the latest record having current designation details
Hope this will help you.
Rani -
The value should be set for Base image URL and Image file directory
Hi experts
Now customer has the following issue.
XML Publisher concurrent request, using RTF layout template with LOGO, does not generate the LOGO for Excel output.
but in output formats PDF, it is shown normally.
from the debug log, we can found the following error message
======
[051812_054716051][][ERROR] Could not create an image. Set html-image-dir and html-image-base-uri correctly.
======
so I tell the customer to do the following action plan.
1. in XML Publisher Administrator resp > Administration expand the HTML Output section.
2a. enter a value for 'Base image URI'
2b. enter a value for 'Image file directory'
Customer set the value as following and retest this issue,but he found the issue is not solved.
Base image URI: /u01/r12/ebssnd/apps/apps_st/comn/java/classes/oracle/apps/media/XXSLI_SONY_LIFE_LOGO.gif
Image file directory: /u01/r12/ebssnd/apps/apps_st/comn/java/classes/oracle/apps/media
I verified 'Base image URI' and 'Image file directory' settings:
1) Change output type to HTML.
2) Click the Preview.
but the image is correctly displayed on HTML, so I think the issue is caused by user's uncorrectly setting of the base image URL and/or image file directory
but could anyone give me some advice on which value should be set for Base image URL and Image file directory
Regards
shuangfeiFirst thing to do is to edit the post and use some tags to format the code as it is unreadable and too much!
Read the FAQ (https://forums.oracle.com/forums/help.jspa) to find out how to do this.
Next we need to know the jdev version you are using!
As the code is generated I would first try to generate it again after the db change.
Timo -
TANN item quantity should come in grey mode in sales order
Hi,
Requirement is in a sales order for TANN item category the quantity should come in non editable (GREY) mode.For this as per my search in Google and forums i got the suggestion to use the "USEREXIT_FIELD_MODIFICATION in MV45AFZZ".But my technical (ABAP) is required more clarity about doing this. Can anybody suggest me in detail how to give logic for him?
For few cases For one sales organisation and for few distribution channels only this quantity should come in grey mode.
Suggest me how to achieve this.hi
in the user exit perform lyk this
loop at screen
if screen name = 'tann'
if field contains value .
screen-input = '0'
modify scrren.
endif.
endif.
endloop.
thanks
chaitanya. -
JMOD condition type value should be always rounded up instead of commercial
Hi Helpers,
I need one clarification from you all based on your expertise,
1. JMOD condition type value should be always rounded up instead of commercial.
2. i have been already made rounding up in the condition type JMOD in the transaction V/06. but unfortunatly not working.
3. after that we found that there is configuration change in spro (company code setting in the indai taxation-CIN) in the Logistic general> tax on goods movement>india> basic setting> company code setting for the commercialrounding, but the same is already ennabled with SD rounding IND.
Need your expertise on this.How shall we make it round up always for JMOD condition value. below is an example for your further analysis.
Example: if values UTXJ is : 8,913.40 and JMOD will be calculated based on UTXJ as 10% thats is 891.34.
Actually this should be 892 as per the requiremen.tI just recently rolled off a project in Europe that had an issue similar to this. We were having rounding issues as a result of % discounts.
However, we did come up with a solution that is provided by SAP.
Please review OSS note 80183 on SAP rounding and the solutions provided within the note.
I hope this helps.
Kind Regards,
Jason -
How input fields should come one below other
Hi,
I want to create an application in webdynpro.My requirement is to develop a personal detail form like name date of berth qualification, date of joining etc. So for that I need to create several input field,LABEL and at last one button (GO).so, please explain the property and related values by which the input fields should come one below other. Like in first line name second line date of berth input field should come.
Thanks
Kundan.Hi Kundan,
In Webdynpro we have four layouts beased on our requirement we used that layouts.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/50568365-ba9e-2b10-1188-a612a20edf31
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/30291df2-b980-2a10-0884-839c4f7f147e
Thanks,
Tulasi Palnati -
Modification date should come on PO Print out
Hi,
I want to show the Modification Dates on PO Print out.. means whenever we change in the PO, that modification date should show in the PO Printout. Is there any idea for do it...
NOTE: - Please note that I m using the copy of Standard Script MEDRUCK.
Regards,Hi,
Now in my PO printout, last date of changed PO is coming... i write a PERFORM in script with subroutine.
But i want all the modified dated...means whenever the PO has been changed, all dates should come on printout.
Please help me...My code is:----
FORM f_convert_changed TABLES in_par STRUCTURE itcsy
out_par STRUCTURE itcsy.
READ TABLE in_par WITH KEY c_ebeln_ekpo.
CHECK sy-subrc = 0.
l_ebeln = in_par-value.
SELECT udate
INTO date_c
FROM cdhdr
WHERE objectclas = 'EINKBELEG'
AND objectid = l_ebeln
AND tcode NOT LIKE 'ME21%'.
a = date_c+0(4).
b = date_c+4(2).
f = date_c+6(2).
CONCATENATE f b a INTO date_ch SEPARATED BY '.'.
READ TABLE out_par WITH KEY 'DATE_CH'.
CHECK sy-subrc = 0.
out_par-value = date_ch.
MODIFY out_par INDEX sy-tabix.
ENDSELECT.
ENDFORM. "f_convert_DATE
and PERFORM in Script is:----
/:DEFINE &DATE_CH&
/:PERFORM F_CONVERT_CHANGED IN PROGRAM ZPO_MEDRUCK1
/:USING &CDHDR-OBJECTCLAS&
/:USING &EKPO-EBELN&
/:CHANGING &DATE_CH&
/:ENDPERFORM
I1Changed Date : &DATE_CH&
Thanks...
Maybe you are looking for
-
NetBeans problem: Issue with servlets and Chinese character encoding
Java Version: JDK1.5.0_01, JRE1.5.0_01 (International version) Netbeans Version: Netbeans IDE 4.0 OS: Windows XP Personal Edition Dear Sirs, First at all thanks for reading this post. I am having the following issue. I am creating an application usin
-
So I bought this iPhone 5 probably a year ago now, and I want to exchange it for a new iPhone 5, or if possible an iPhone 5s (if they don't have iPhone 5 anymore), idk. EITHER WAY, I've read in the web a little about this and apparently I can't do it
-
Error message when importing?? help!!!!
the past three times i've imported pictures to my iphoto i get this error message: "The following images could not be imported - they may be an unrecognized file type or the file may not contain vaild data /private/var/tmp/folders.501/TemporaryItems/
-
Hi Friends I have database x , i created database y, how to export the all from database x and how to import to database y.
-
On a Macbook Pro Retina, I am trying to capture video with Premiere Pro from my Canon Vixia HG20. The camera takes a USB-Mini5b and the computer takes a USB-A (computer has inputs for USB 3.0, and Apple Thunderbolt). In the Premiere capture window,