PR05 Cost distribution error

I am doing cost centre assignemnt at the receipt level in PR05. The trip is charged against cost cnetre A.
There are 10 receipts in the trip.
1,2 - charged to cost centre A
3,4 - charged to cost centre B
5,6 - charged to cost centre C
7-10 - explicit cost assignment not defined
When the statement is printed, it displayed Cost Centre C for recipts 7-10.
Ideally it should display Cost centre A for recipts 7-10.
Then I manually assigned the cost centre A to receipts 7-10. Printed report stated displaying correct values for receipts 7-10.
Is this the bug in standard functionality/any SAP note is available? or this is part of standard functionality.

Hi
Normally it will take what ever you assign in the header as default. When you are entering for individual line items different cost centers, it will copy the previous line cost assignment for the next line also and only when it is different, the user can change the cost centers.
Its a standard functionality.
Regards,
Lakshmanan Krishnan

Similar Messages

Error while doing cost distribution

Hi all:
while I am trying to do cost distribution , a message comes that
Cycle DOFF is not valid on 11/01/2008
Message no. GA509
Diagnosis
Cycle DOFF is valid as of the starting date 04/14/2009
System response
This cycle cannot be processed.
Could you please tell me how solve the issue ?
Thank you very much

Hi,
The error is because you have created Cycle DOFF with the starting date 04/14/2009 & you are trying to run the distribution cycle for November 2008.
For which period do you want to run the cycle?
1) If it is for April 2009, then enter the correct period & year when executing the cycle.
2) If it is for November 2008, then you will have to increase the validity of the cycle. I dont think you can change the start date of a cycle. You could however create a new cycle with validity period Nov 2008 to Dec 9999 by copying the cycle DOFF & only changing the start & end date. Then execute this new cycle.
Regards,
Sangeeta

Multiple Account assignment with cost distribution value error

Hello Experts,
We are facing the below issue,
We are trying to create Limit SC with MAA cost center with cost distribution "By Value". we distribute the total value to 5 cost centers. when we try to order the SC, system is not allowing us to order, we got the error message "Multiple account assignment only with percentage less than 100%".
Please advise how to resolve this issue.
Regards,
Santhosh Kumar.G

Hi
Check this OSS notes : 1644804
Regards
G.Ganesh Kumar

Travel Cost Distribution

We are having two company codes here, 1000 and 2000. Employees belong
to either of them. If an employee belongs to company code 1000, and he
makes allocation of his cost 100% to a cost centre that belongs to
company code 2000, we are having no problem in posting of expenses.
This we are handling by maintaining the cost centre belonging to 2000,
in the Infotype 17 of that employee.
However with the same employee belonging to comapny code 1000, if he
does cost allocation 50% to his master cost centre which belongs to
company code 1000 and 50% to a cost centre that belongs to company code
2000, we are facing error in posting.
Is this possible in Travel Management or it
is to be handled in FI module manually . If possible in Travel
Management, please help on achieving this

Hi Friends and Guru's,
I have a smilar issue related to travel management assignment of travel cost to different cost centre and different company code more details as below:
We have two company codes 1000 on one COA1 (Chart of Account) and Controlling area COA1 and another company code is on different COA2(Chart of Account) and Controlling Area COA2 and all employees are created in Company code 1000 and we do not have any employees created in Company Code 2000. Issue is business wants to allocate some travel done on 2000 should go to company code 2000, I have tried to change option in Infotype0017 and tried to play around Infotype 0027 subtype 02 cost distribution option no luck for sucess.
I would like to know your expert advice that do i need to create all employees in Company code 2000 and do i need to re-config Travel management along with GL mapping to 2000 or any substitute way to resolve this issue.
Your inputs much appriciated.
Regards,
Srini

Cost distribution on infotype 15

We have our cost distribution assigned to our positions; we do not use IT0027. In some cases, we want certain types of payments to be posted to a specific cost center and fund. We enter these payments on IT0015. When I try to use the maintain cost assignment on the infotype, I get the following message:
"Account assgn Functional Area is active in HR on 09/06/2009 and must therefore contain a value"
The functional area is also set up on the cost distribution at the position level. What are we missing that is preventing us from using this functionality on IT0015?
Thanks in advance for the guidance!!

Thanks.
The functional areas are defined using transaction PO13, infotype 1018, field FKBER.
I removed the cost distribution on the position and left only the account assignment, IT1008, on the position. I tried entering the cost distribution on IT0015 with and without an IT0027, and I receive the same error message as before.

Cost distribution not working for -Ve Transactions

Hi,
We are spliting the cost for an misc transaction. The Splitted cost are got cost distributed. But the Reversal expenditure (-ve Transaction) is not get cost distributed.
The cost distribute flag is enabled for the reversal transaction. but no credit or debit account populated. Please let me know what might be the issue.
Thanks In advance
Thanks
Raj

Check the cost distribution concurrent request's output. It will tell you the reason. It might be an auto-accounting issue too. Post the error code here.
Sathish Raju
www.projectsaccounting.com

Problems with cost distribution "by value"

Hi All,
We have the following problem in cost assignment in shopping cart: We can choose different cost distributions: 1. by percentage; 2. by quantity; 3. by value. When choosing 3 - "by value" and distributing values to different WBS-elements with budget check, system comes up with several error messages saying budget overspend, also we exactly fill in the open budget on theese WBS-elements. The main reason for this seam that our backend system R/3 4.70 just knows the two posibilities 1. - by percentage; 2. by quantity.
Do you guys know a possibility in customizing or elsewhere to deactivare the possibility 3 - by value, since I think back end can not work with this kind of distribution.
Best Regards Thomas

Hi
Do you want to remove the drop down by value in the shoping cart screen ?
BADI - BBP_UI_CONTROL_BADI - method BBP_SC_UI_CTRL field control You may try here
regards
Muthu

Infoset query of vendor payments at the cost distribution level

We would like an infoset query of vendor payments at the cost distribution level of the document. The issue seems to be joining vendor to the document cost distribution lines.
1.) BSAK + BSIK can be combined with an infoset data structure but only contain the vendor line of a document; the cost distribution lines are not in the tables.
2.) BSIS + BSAS can be combined with an infoset data structure but lack vendor data and joins (to a vendor source) are not an option with data structures. Vendor data added with an additional field is too slow to be a primary selection field.
3.) Logical data base KDF in an infoset returns only the vendor line of a document, not the cost distribution lines.
4.) Logical data base BRM in an infoset can have vendor from BSAK/BSIK attached by an additional field but performance is too slow to be useful. Joins are not an option in a logical data base infoset.
5.) Complete data is lacking when table joins between document cost distribution tables and vendor data tables are possible, (SPL actual line item table & BSIP or FMIFIIT & FMIFIHD). BSIP lacks AB documents (reversals). FM tables lack general ledger only documents.
6.) BSAK and BSIK together have complete vendor data but joins of both to a basis table do not work well. Left outer joins are too slow, inner joins won’t work since the tables have mutually exclusive data.
It would be ideal to have vendor in BKPF, like FMIFIHD has, but it isn't a field.
Does anyone know of any other options? I have seen the helpful thread on How to Read BSEG Efficiently

Hi,
This is SAP Business one reporting and printing forum. Please find correct forum and repost above discussion to get quick response.
Please close this thread here with helpful answer.
Thanks & Regards,
Nagarajan

Infoset query of vendor payments at the cost distribution level of the document

We would like an infoset query of vendor payments at the cost distribution level of the document. The issue seems to be joining vendor to the document cost distribution lines.
1.) BSAK + BSIK can be combined with an infoset data structure but only contain the vendor line of a document; the cost distribution lines are not in the tables.
2.) BSIS + BSAS can be combined with an infoset data structure but lack vendor data and joins (to a vendor source) are not an option with data structures. Vendor data added with an additional field is too slow to be a primary selection field.
3.) Logical data base KDF in an infoset returns only the vendor line of a document, not the cost distribution lines.
4.) Logical data base BRM in an infoset can have vendor from BSAK/BSIK attached by an additional field but performance is too slow to be useful. Joins are not an option in a logical data base infoset.
5.) Complete data is lacking when table joins between document cost distribution tables and vendor data tables are possible, (SPL actual line item table & BSIP or FMIFIHD & FMIFIIT). BSIP lacks AB documents (reversals). FM tables lack general ledger only documents.
6.) BSAK and BSIK together have complete vendor data but joins of both to a basis table are not an option. Left outer joins are too slow, inner joins won’t work since the tables have mutually exclusive data.
Does anyone know of any other options?

Hi,
This is SAP Business one reporting and printing forum. Please find correct forum and repost above discussion to get quick response.
Please close this thread here with helpful answer.
Thanks & Regards,
Nagarajan

Refresh problem in Shopping Cart and PO in cost distribution in SRM 7.0

Hi ,
As of now we are working in SRM 7.0. Actually when we are changing the account assignment cateogary from WBS to Asset then the cost distribution need to be changed from Percentage to quantity and vice-versa. But this is not happening .
Can somebody hlp on this if you guys came across such issue.
Regards,
Kalyani

Kalyani
Cost distribution will not change automatically when you change the account assignment category. You will ve to distribute it manually on the same lines as you did for Cost Center earlier
Regards
VIrender Singh

Cost distribution SRM to R/3 - based on VALUE

Hi all,
We are working on SRM 5.0 and R/3 4.7.,ECS
In shopping cart when the cost dsitirbution is sleected as "VALUE",when the corresponding SRM PO replicates to R/3,the cost distribution always changes to percentage/quantity....Why is that R/3 system recognises the cost distribution only for quantity or percentage???
Also we are now upgrading iur R/3 system to ECC 6.0.Is the above issue resolved in ECC or still persists in ECC 6.0 too???
Has anybody encountered the above issue??Please share experiences.

I am curious as to if you got this resolved. When we upgraded, I was hoping that we would finally get to use distribute by value between SRM and SAP without it converting over to percentages. I have worked with OSS and the discussion forum to come up with a resolution but no luck yet.

Valuation with material cost estimate: error with product

Hi Experts,
Message no. KE350, Valuation with material cost estimate: error with product "2286940000". Please suggest me to resolve this issue.
Points will be provided for good solution.
Regards,
Jay

Hi Jaya
This means that your customization is wrong then...
In KE4J or KEPC you have assigned costing keys to your material types or some other combination... You should have done this config in a way that costing key is not called for in the case of non valuated materials...
In Ke40 you have defined costing key where in you have specified "Issue error msg if no cost estimate found".. This costing key is assigned in KE4J or KEPC in a way that it is getting called even in case of non valuated materials...
Do you have a separate mat type for non valuated material? If yes, remove this mat type from KE4J/KEPC..
If you dont have separate mat type i.e. in the same mat type if you have both valuated and non valuated, then you have a problem.. You would get stuck in that case
Regards
Ajay M

Valuation with material cost estimate: error with product "117122"

Hi people,
We have the error:
=====================
Valuation with material cost estimate: error with product "117122"
Diagnosis
In Profitability Analysis (CO-PA), the system tried to valuate a line item using the current standard cost estimate.
In order to determine the current plan period, the system needs to read the valuation segment of the material master.
The system has found that the current plan period is not filled forproduct "117122" in plant "UBE1".
We have the follow configuration in trans.: KE40:
. Determine material cost estimate
   . Transf. Standard Cost Estimate
. Costing Variant
. Control Data for Standard Cost Estimate
   . Period Indicator = "Current Standard Cost Estimate acc. to entry in mat master
. Addiitonal data CO-PC
    . Transfer cost estimate in controlling area currency "activated"
We think the reason about our error is because the field above is activated and some configuration more is necessary for this case. For examplo: Trans.: OKYW and this one was not configurated yet.
Do you know what happend?
If we need to configure some transation, or sonly process the cost estimate?
Thanks,
Rosana.

Hello Guido
Thank you very much for your return.
It is happenning in a Client that some people are doing the configuration.
Before we didin't have in KE40, the fiel "Transfer cost estimate in controlling area currency" activated.
And now, the people activate that in this new Client and I don't know the impact about that.
I think we have to make the configuration in OKYW.
The other transation you told me, we don't have any information.
Could you tell me some other idea what happend?
Message error is just "Message no. KE350"
Abou claculate the cost:
It was calculated by trans.: CK11N for future planning and the real wasn't not possible to release because this material already have moviments.
Could you tell us is there is some thing more to do?
Thanks,
Rosana.

Valuation with material cost estimate: error with product " 200038 "

Hi,
I am getting an error:
Valuation with material cost estimate: error with product " 200038 " (Message KE350).
Kindly assist on the same?

If this material is mto material go to t.code KE40 and maintain define access to standard cost estimate define cost key with
"Transfer sales orde cost estimatex".
If it is mts material define costing key with Transfer std cost estimate and in costing data
costing variant : ppc1
costing verstion: 1
period indicator: Release std cost estimate matching with goods issue or material costing matching posting date.
This will resolve ur problem.

Cost distribution in Extended classic scenario

Hi All,
We are in SRM 4.0 using extended classic scenario.
When we create a purchase order with cost distribution, it gets copied to backend system. But the partial invoice field in backend PO is always having the value "Distribution in sequence".
In configuration for account assignment category, it has been defaulted to "Distribute proportionately".
When we checked with SAP they told that for SRM POs it will always be distribute in sequence. It has to be distributed while posting MIRO. This value is hardcoded in SRM PO transfer program. It is very strange and moreover this is a essential functionality which needs to be in SRM.
Any one using extended classic scenario, could you please tell me how you are handling multiple account assignments?
Please help me.
Thanks,
Arun

Friends,
If you are using cost distributions in extended classic scenario, then could you please check and let me know the value that you are getting in the "Partial Invoice" field in Account assignment tab of backend PO.
Please help.
Thanks,
Arun

PR05 Cost distribution error

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for