Preference Status of Vendor Declaration

Hi,
On what criteria is the preference status of a material calculated/changed by the system.I can view the status during the vendor declaration as either red/yellow/green.I need to understand what changes to the material cause the change in the status.Can anyone help??

Dear A Pothuneedi,
You would not see a material preference status while creating vendor (XK01). What transaction are you using to create vendor ? I mean in which transaction are you able to see material preference status while declaring vendor ?
The vendor and material combination is used in Inforecord and sourcelist. You have an option in source list to specify a particular vendor as fixed vendor for that particular material.
Hope this will help.
Regards,
Naveen.

Similar Messages

Preference Processing: Not able to see PO in Manage Vendor Declaration

Hello All,
I have completed below activities for Preference Processing
1) Material transferred from Feeder to GTS
2) Material Prices & Procurement indicators transferred to GTS
3) BOM Transferred to GTS
4) Material and all BOM item classified
5) Preference indicators and LTVD details are maintained in Product master in GTS
Now I have create a PO for Raw material and the PO is transferred to GTS but i am not able to see the PO in path /SAPSLL/MENU_LEGAL --> Risk Management --> Preference Processing --> Manage Vendor - Based Vendor Declaration --> Display worklist.
Have i missed any configuration?
Awaiting for positive reply
Thanks & Regards
Rahul

It doesn't sound as much that you missed something as it does you'd done one step too many.
In step 5 where you say you have maintained preference/ltvd status in the MM; that's why you wouldn't be seeing your PO listed under 2014 in pref processing. Since you've already manually maintained it's status, you've basically bypassed the need for that PO this year.
If you change the year in Preference Processing however, you should see your PO listed for the FTO in question for 2015. Without the manually maintained material status in place, this material/vendor combination should be relelvant for request with the year pushed out.
Thanks,

SD- Preference - Request Vendor Declaration

Hi All,
I came across a problem with printing the form: SD_EXPORT_VDFORM (Request Vendor Declaration):
when selecting mutiple suppliers & materials for printing the request, the supplier number (last page)
does variate form the supplier adress on the first & last page. (e.g. Form ist printed for supplier 12345
ABC-Company but the supplier-number printed is 12346 => previous supplier XYZ-Company in the selection list.
I have searched the OSS for relevant notes, but didn´t find any desribing exactly the same problem.
Before raising an Error Report I´d like to give the SDN a try!
Does anybody know how to solve this problem ? Maybe there´s a SAP-Note which I didn´t find?
KRGDS
Joachim
Edited subject so it would format correctly
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Mar 29, 2010 11:13 AM

Dear A Pothuneedi,
You would not see a material preference status while creating vendor (XK01). What transaction are you using to create vendor ? I mean in which transaction are you able to see material preference status while declaring vendor ?
The vendor and material combination is used in Inforecord and sourcelist. You have an option in source list to specify a particular vendor as fixed vendor for that particular material.
Hope this will help.
Regards,
Naveen.

Vendor declaration status in the material master

Hello,
How do I maintain Vendor declaration status in the material master? Currently Vendor declaration status is 'Not maintained' in the material master.
Sincerely,
Ketan

Hi,
From IMG, choose Materials Management>Purchasing>Foreign Trade/Customs>Preference Processing>Maintain Control Data of Vendor Declaration, after that you will find the status in the material master data.
Good luck
Tao

Preference status not changed for the processed products

Hello All,
While Aggregating the vendor declaration, I am getting the message as below
Preference status not changed for the processed products
Could you please help me to resolve this issue.
Thanks & Regards
Rahul

Hello Rahul,
aggregation is not changing status on LTVD. (Possibly LTVD has been already agregated). Newly maintained LTVD is not changing status of the product, its remaining negative whatsoever.
Kr,
Gabriel.

Purchase order and vendor declaration work list problem

Now, I'm testing GTS 8.0 for FTA related things.
In the proceeding the test, I stuck in a problem.
After making purchase order with order type NB, the system should make the worklist for the long-vendor declaration.
But it dosen't make the worklist after creating of PO.
But it make the worklist after Goods Receipts.
I made related configurations with it.
1. Activate Transfer of Purchasing Documents ( MM0A ).
2. Configure Control Setting for Document Transfer.
In the second transaction, I selected the Application Level MM0A and make document type FNB(Standard PO).
And I checked all the check boxes including Generate Worklist of Vendor-Based Long-Term Vendor Declarations.
I did the same configurations with MM0C.
I searched in every direction, but I fail to get the reason.
Thank you for the reading.
Best Regards,
Jong Hwan.

I have checked I have already assigned the Partner Scheme to the PO type.
And, In the first transaction you wrote above(/SAPSLL/PREF_AGR_R3), I got a message.
Please check the following items:.
check activity 03 of legal regulation , "Preference tariff processing"
Simulation Run - No Database Changes
And in the second transaction, No data was found for the selection creteria.
Thank you.
Best Regards,
Jong Hwan.
Edited by: JONG HWAN PARK on Mar 18, 2011 8:33 AM

Really urgent: help in making report for status of vendor payement

Hi,
I am making a report in which i have to display the status of vendor whether it is paid or not?
Till now i am able to have knowledge that when we do MIGO there are the Financial Documents form there i get the account no.. whichit is stored in the BKPF table. From there we have the account no... and after that there are 4 tables into which i have to look after the tables i.e. BSAS,BSIK,BSIS, n BSAK.
Plzz tell me how should i make a report as the Acount no.. have to move among these tables to get the status of it pament.
plzz provide me some guidelines for making a report for it as help will be deifnately rewarded.
Edited by: abaper2008 on May 21, 2008 6:52 AM

Hi,
Hi,
I making a report in which i have to display the vendor payment is done or not?
Curently i am using the 4 tables of Financial :-
BSAK,BSIS,BSIK AND BSAS which gives the status of vendor whether it is paid or not . 1 thing i observed that data compared wit htew MKPF table among these tables(BSAS,BSIK N BSAK) is not coming right as i am taking common field XBLNR among them all .
One more thing i observed that BLART is getting changed in each table.
for instance,
if the BLART is WE for material document and i am taking XBLNR filed from this table MKPF and den looking XBLNR in BKPF where the entry consist of BLART - RE n WE and finally when i look up in the BSAK table the field consist of RE .
How can i see that it is being paid or not the BLART is keep on changing.
Plzz proivde me guidelines as how to rectify the problem?
Edited by: abaper2008 on May 21, 2008 9:03 AM

Definition of parked status in vendor line item display

Hi All,
What is the definition of parked status in vendor line item display?
Thanks
Pauline

Hi,
1.Please check the WHT config has been done properly.
2.Check the vendor master and varify tax fields are filled up.
Regards

Field Status for Vendor Line item or Customer line item

Hi
Can i need to check the Field status for Vendor or Customer Line item when i use the transaction codes F-43 or F-22. This is very urgent.
Regards

Hi Vinay,
You cannot check the Field Status directly when posting a document. The Field Status is controlled by the Field Status group. This is controlled at 3 levels, the company code level, G/L Master level and at the Posting key level. Field status at the posting key level overwrites other groups. It is basically to control which fiedls need to be supressed, which are required and which are optional.
In FS00 under the create/bank/interest tab you will find the field group. Check the Recon account assigned to your vendor/customer master and check the field status in FS00.
Regards
Sridhar

System Preferences status icons not showing in the Menubar.

After upgradind to Mavericks some System Preferences status icons stopped being shown in the Menubar.
Anyone experiencing the same?Can someone help with a tip for restoring the Menubar as it was in ML?

Open System Prefs...
Some but not all will have an option to show in the menu bar.
For third party apps, check in the app prefs and see if it has 'show in menu bar'.

Idoc Status 51 - Vendor not defined in company code

Hi All
I'm having an error when performing intercompany stock transfer. The system creates an idoc but unable to post the subsequent document due to the error " VENDOR NOT DEFINED IN COMPANY CODE XXXX"- Status 51. I have checked over and over ahain but everything looks ok. Could sme1 let me know what I could be missing please
Thanks a lot
Edited by: Joe Ujoh on Jul 22, 2008 5:27 PM

Hi Joe,
You said you checked everything again and again and is OK; to start with, does the vendor exist in CoCd - pl. check using T code XK03 and see if you have anything in Company Code data.

Vendor Master: Field Status madatory donu00B4t work

Hello my friends!!!
I have a problem whit a fields status in vendor master to account group.
I make the field status as mandatory "bank details" to the account group of vendors. This field has several fields within itself.
When I run the t.code MK01, only some fields ask for obligatory and another no. to me. It allows me to happen of screen without completing all the fields.
Why don´t work this check??'
So that it does not work correctly? somebody knows like doing so that it works? Is something this bad one in customizing?
thanks
Regards

If you have made the req entry for the account group and you are using same accoutn group then it should work.
The bank detials is suppressed for MK01 so it will not work
make reqd for MK01 in OMSX tcode

PIR Tariff Preference data update using BAPI/FM

Hi Experts,
I have a business requirement to update the "Vendor Declaration" data in the PIR.
Change PIR (ME12) -- > Extras --> Tariff Preference
We want to update the following fields from a ABAP program.
LFEI-WERKS
LFEI-GZOLX
LFEI-PRENE
LFEI-PRENG
Can you please suggest any standard BAPI/ Function Module to update the same,
Regards
Gobinathan G

batch input RM06IBI0 can be used to update those fields

ECATT QTP Integration Error - "No Vendor specified".

Hi
Currently we faced one problem that when we try to call QTP tool in one eCATT script GUI by Click "Script" button at the top of the UI.
Error Msg is shown as "No Vendor is specified" at the bottom of the status bar.
For the eCATT QTP Integration pre-condition Check, we already added the QTP as the third party tool in Table " ECCUST_ET".
and also For the corresponding eCATT script, We also selected the QTP as the third party tool from the drop down list when try to create the eCATT script at the first time.
So could anyone here help about how to resolve the u201CNo Vendor is specifiedu201D error?
Total new for me about the eCATT.
Thanks a lot.

Refer SAP Note 794343 - Request Vendor Declaration: no data for plant specification
Symptom - If you request a vendor declaration and do not specify a plant as selection option, no list is output. The system issues error message EI452 "No data was selected".
Reason and Prerequisites - This is caused by a program error.
OR
Refer SAP Note 197043 - Mandatory entry vendor on goods movement overview
Symptom - When components are confirmed with special stock indicators K, L, M, O or P, the vendor has to be specified.Since the system automatically finds the vendor during the goods movement, however, a specification is not necessary in the confirmation. Nevertheless, you must make an entry on the goods movement overview as soon as you modify the material.
Cause and prerequisites -The entry is only forced for a blank field.The field is only blank if the vendor was not already specified in the order (detail material).
OR
Refer SAP Note 169621 - Program termination during goods movement
Hope it can assist you.
Thanks & Regards
JP

Preference Processing (Origin) for Europe

Hi,
We are in a process of implementing the Preference Processing functionality in the standard SAP system for Europe. I need your help and suggestion by way of any guide which expalins step wise configuration and master data maintenance and how to execute transactions eg.exploding a BoM for In-house manufactured products and when Aggregating Vendor Declaration Indicators for traded goods.
The scenario here is we have a few of suppliers for a Material XYZ which is a Trading material and a couple of the supplier is within Europe and we have a Long term Supplier Declaration for Preference Origin from these Suppliers. Now when creating a PO after maintaining the PIR for such Vendor and material how will the system ensure that whether the material procured from the EU Vendor is eligible for Preferential processing. Also when I create a SO for the same material how the system identifies if the material was procured within Europe from the preferred vendors or it has been procured from 3rd coutries. When testing we found that the system does not check the details but only checks for the MAPE table in the Material Master.
We need an step by step guide apart from SAP documentation SD-FT-PRE.
Regards,
Sumit

With the standard configuration from SD part, I dont think, this requirement can be achieved, as system needs to check the origin of the vendors which is MM side.
You have to try with sale order exits like USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE in the program MV45AFZZ where the coding should be in such a way that whenever a sale order is created for such materials, it should first validate the field BESKZ from MARC table followed by Purchasing tables like EKES, EKPO etc., to validate the vendor code.
G. Lakshmipathi

Preference Status of Vendor Declaration

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for