Preformance issues

i've been havin a prob w/my comp and i wanted to see if anyone might know what the hell is going on. the comp keeps freezing for a second or so, randomly, if i'm typing something and it hits my text stops and catches up after a few secs or music will skip, or if i'm playing a game it just freezes for a second
fyi there is no spyware running
it's getting very annoying, i thought it might be a prob with XP so i formatted and reinstalled but it's still acting up. i was thinking it might be the processor? i have a p4 2.4ghz it's usually at about 95 degrees varies +/- about 15 degrees normally i checked with intel and they say that's well within it's operating parameters.
i'm thinking it might be a prob w/the motherboard. any one have any ideas? or maybe a good benchmarking utility?

Hi emissaryhm,
Please give your signature (or computer spec. as shown below) so somebody in this forum can help you (see the Forum Rules)
Good Luck
Casing Tt Xaser III Skull
M/B 865 PE Neo-2 PFS Platinum Edition Bios Ver.3.6
CPU:P4 2.4C (HT enable) and ThermalTake SubZero 4G
(DOT Rank=Commander,Turbo,2395 mHz - 2760 mHz)
Memory: Corsair XMS 3500 2x512 meg (dual-channel dimm 2 and 4)
VGA:ELSA Gladiac 925 Ti4600
HD:2 SATA Maxtor 80gig and 1 ATA Maxtor 80Gig
CD/RW Yamaha and Pioneer DVD
PSU:ThermalTake Silent PurePower 480W (W0010/Black)
+5 V/40 A, +3.3 V/30 A, +12 V/18 A, -5 V/0.3 A, -12 V/0.8 A, +5 VSB/2 A Peak Load 550 W
Window XP PRO SP1
NEC FP2141SB
Microsoft DesktopPro
Sound Blaster Audigy 2 Platinum + Klipsch Promedia 4.1

Similar Messages

Preformance issues when upgrading from dbxml 2.3.8 to 2.4.13

I have recently upgraded my dbxml distribution from 2.3.8 to 2.4.13 (including the latest patch). I have noticed that many of the queries I issue take longer than they used to. Specifically if the query is complex it takes 10 times as long as it did with 2.3.8. Also I have noted a difference in speed between issuing the query via the dbxml shell (query takes ~45 seconds) vs issuing it through a c++ interface (query takes 4+ minutes). The query am issuing is:
for $i in collection('projectDatabase.dbxml')/project
where $i[obsblock/obsblockStatus eq 'INCOMPLETE' and obsblock/receiverBand eq '3MM' and obsblock/remainingTime >= 1.0 and ((obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low <= 2.61799 and obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low >= 0.654498) or (obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high <= 2.61799 and obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high >= 0.654498) or (0.654498 <= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high and 0.654498 >= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low) or ((obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high < obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low) and ((0.654498 <= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high) or (2.61799 <= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high) or (0.654498 >= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low) or (2.61799 >= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low)))) and obsblock/arrayConfiguration eq 'C' and projectID ne'opnt' and projectID ne'rpnt' and projectID ne'tilt' and projectID ne'fringe' and projectID ne'test']
return $i
if I simplify the query by removing references to the obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low and obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high nodes:
for $i in collection('projectDatabase.dbxml')/project
where $i[obsblock/obsblockStatus eq 'INCOMPLETE' and obsblock/receiverBand eq '3MM' and obsblock/remainingTime >= 1.0 and obsblock/arrayConfiguration eq 'C' and projectID ne'opnt' and projectID ne'rpnt' and projectID ne'tilt' and projectID ne'fringe' and projectID ne'test']
return $i
it returns much faster. I am wondering if this is an issue with optimization of the complex query?
The database is fully indexed and was re-indexed when I upgraded to 2.4.13

Doug,
I've got your container. It's a wholedoc container with document indexes (a lot of them). Here's what I see for query speeds for your large, slow query using the dbxml shell.
Query is:
query "for $i in collection('pdb.dbxml')/project where $i[obsblock/obsblockStatus eq 'INCOMPLETE' and obsblock/receiverBand eq '3MM' and obsblock/remainingTime >= 1.0 and ((obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low <= 2.61799 and obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low >= 0.654498) or (obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high <= 2.61799 and obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high >= 0.654498) or (0.654498 <= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high and 0.654498 >= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low) or ((obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high < obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low) and ((0.654498 <= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high) or (2.61799 <= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high) or (0.654498 >= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low) or (2.61799 >= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low)))) and obsblock/arrayConfiguration eq 'C' and projectID ne'opnt' and projectID ne'rpnt' and projectID ne'tilt' and projectID ne'fringe' and projectID ne'test'] return $i"
2.3.11 -- 2.4 seconds
2.4.13 -- 60 seconds
That is a significant slowdown and it needs further investigation but is almost certainly related to the fact that it is wholedoc storage. The optimizer appears to be choosing unwisely. This will take a few days to work out.
I also changed the container to be node storage with node indexes and the times went to:
2.3.11 -- 13 sec (slower than wholedoc)
2.4.13 -- 40 sec (faster than wholedoc)
I do know why your application is slower than the dbxml shell. There is a new flag that should almost always be used for wholedoc container queries -- DBXML_DOCUMENT_PROJECTION. Add that to you query excecution.
Another thing -- query preparation is a bit slower in 2.4 so you should use prepared queries whenever possible to amortize that cost.
Regards,
George

Preformance issue with JAVAC

I have seen a considerable performance degradation when running multiple instance of javac.
Actually I was running a javac ant task and at the same time I do a build all for the same project (codebase) using eclipse IDE.
It is dead slow; normally it takes 5 min to execute the ant task which is now taking around 1 hr.
Same is the case with eclipse.
Is this a known issue? If not, can someone file a bug with Sun in order to get it fixed?

A slowdown that big is most likely caused by paging. Use the tools for your O/S to see if that's the case. If so close some other apps, have the builds use smaller java heaps, buy more memory, or do just one at a time :-).
-John

ITunes has terrible preformance issues

As iTunes has marched along with its myriad of updates, its performance has progressively gotten worse. It seems every time I upgrade (which is usually unnecessary) iTunes gets slower and slower. When I plug in my iPod it hangs for anywhere between 30-60 seconds. When I open it up after a period of relative disuse, it also takes between 30-60 seconds to react. Searching for things or simply trying to open up a playlist creates unacceptable lag. Resizing the window and accessing the iTunes store also have terrible response times. When I first started using iTunes I never had these problems but now they prevent me from using the program quite often.
iTunes also tends to constantly gobble up memory and disk space as it hangs around. I usually leave iTunes open for several days at a time. (since it takes so long to shut down and start up) But after a week of use, I can usually expect the program to have 150 Mb of memory and anywhere from 150 Mb to 350 Mb of virtual space taken up. This also causes shutdown times that can last up to 5 minutes. It has a memory leak it seems to me that is worse than Firefox.
Should I say screw everything and downgrade to an earlier version? I did this once before but I had unfortunately "upgraded" my iPod's software which realized that iTunes wasn't up to par and gave me an error message. (exactly what was so incompatible between versions is beyond me however)
Any suggestions without upgrading my hardware?
Is live updating a bear for the system to deal with?

I have a very powerful PC and it doesn't make a difference. 7.6 is just a mess. Your choice is to either try and go back to an older version (Best - before 7.5), or try winamp which works pretty good, but isn't as user friendly in it's looks (and no good if you've purchased lots of protected iTunes store product).
I agree in full what you've said - this mess of an "update" has really made me rethink my loyalty to iTunes and Apple products

Fullscreen performance issue on a Netbook: not useable on AtomN270

I have a preformance issue, I have a S10e Netbook, and I tought that the performance should be enough to watch iTunes SD videos. Without going into fullscreen I can see that I am reaching the limits, as soon as I try in fullscreen it is the end. If I watch the same videos in VLC (take one bought on iTunes Plus for instance), there is absolutely no problems, and the CPU still has margin. VLC can even decode videos with 720x480 encoded for AppleTV profile and it plays very fluid. So what is the problem with iTunes ? Why is video playing so sluggish ? Any tipps to make this useable ?

Has anyone a trick or can just confirm that it is the way it is ?

Snap crackle pop issue....fixed - audigy 2 plat/

My first post, Hope the title doesn't mislead/anger anyone, but i truly believe these solutions
are uni'versal and can be applied with just about everyone.
My card is almost 5 years old now or so... I've seen the frustration on this board about this
nasty issue.... i felt SO bad for some of you guys that i just had to sign up and share my
knowledge (or lack of!) for the multiple, possible 'fixes' to this. its not entirely CREATIVE's
fault and there is ways to fix it, you just need a bit of Patience and the willingness to learn
a bit more about your hardware if you arent too savy with tweaking it. this might of all been
said before, but i really hope this helps some of you.
Lets get the blahblahblah's outta the way just to be safe, shall we? Obviously, make sure your
card isn't sharing an IRQ with a cd/dvd device, or any kind of hardware that transfers a lot of
data constantly or uses a lot of power like a hard-dri've, maybe even certain gpu's. In my case,
my bottom PCI-slot (3/3) only shares an irq with a USB port and as corny as it sounds it did
improve the issue (i disabled that USB, but that isn't necessary its overkill/fail-safe
precaution, probably doesn't even help at all, paranoia setting). download Si-Software Sandra to
see exactly what belongs to where and what irq is being shared with what. Also before i forget,
clean out your dri'ves with bleach/acid/napalm with a program such as Drivercleaner, just to be
safe, right?
If you have anything on your Motherboard that's VIA/raid related, its imperati've you upgrade the
drivers for it, it could very well be your single solution, for example the latest via_hyperion
pro_v5a.zip did it for me and my particular setup just recently after a small hardware upgrade.
this fixed the MAJORITY of the pops in several different machines with these motherboards as well
i might add. Also make sure the Cable is newer than 2 years old, dirty worn cables can
cripple/weird out any piece of hardware, that goes for HD's, CD roms, ...anything that uses
IDE/serial cables etc. lots of people toss their dvd/cd roms out thinking they've used its
life-span, when a brand new ide cable is all it really needed. but... this VIA/raid driver
problem seems to be a pretty common fix in my experiences.
Gamers who suffer from "sudden" or "random" pops here and there while gaming......... with time
will notice this occurs usually when the HD is seeking a lot of info and is under a decent amount
of stress, OBLIVION is a good example of the HD being as important as ram/cpu/gpu IMO. that's
why....... "it seems to do it more (pops/cracks) with certain games than others". ACOUSTIC
MANAGEMENT is Often to blame for this in My opinion, and some maxtor dri'ves come with this
enabled from the factory (why, why why?!! ...die die die!!!). Imagine setting the In-game HD
cache setting Tweak for obilivion enabled to , + Acoustic managementenabled....it turns
preformance into a bloody mess, and will (possibly, most likely?) crack annoyingly often whenever
a new area is being loaded and sufficient data is being called, not to mention make a less
experienced gamer think his machine is completely screwed for no reason. Acousitc Mangemtn
enabled on a hard-dri've can be suicidal for certain games and will almost guarantee preformance
issues, cracks, burns, bruises, broken bones, stab wounds.....and most likely the lovely POPS...
the nasty loud firecracker ones...it can be so bad to the point where many of us will not even
play anymore out of frustration, especially for you audiophiles... leaving us angry and desperate
for a fix. Acoustic management CRIPPLES performance and destroys seek-time, that i AM sure of,
so fix it anyway for your own good, unless you don't care for performance. Please, get rid of
this nasty, possibly/commonly built in feature that turns a 7200rpm dri've into a 5400rpm (ouch),
make SURE this is disabled for you maxtor/seagate HD owners who play games or just want better
performance period. You'll have to google those instructions, I wouldnt dare say more.
On a separate machine, "tad in" and "cd audio" had to be muted to stop a lot of it, as well as EAX
effects (i know you love eax, but its worth the sacrifice) slider turned DOWN to 0% even when disabled.
this may not be necessary for everyone, but a lot of us suffer from those soft "echoey crackles"
and its a quick fix. im sure you've all read this "solution" 5 billion times, but it doesnt hurt
to put it out there. that, or dxdiag or control panel audio properties the slider to Standard acceleration, better to lose eax IMO.
there is no support or guarantee with this patch, and it supposedly doesn't support/work properly
with XP Servicepack 2, however this worked on my dads machine and a friends' as well. GOOGLE
"down vlatency", (not "download" vlatency) and click on the "georgebreese.com" link and try his
vlatency_v020_beta2.exe. this simply overrides some BIOS settings that many of us cant access
easily or at all, and boosts IDE latency and on a lot of different PC setups and gives more
juice to the PCI bus by editing how much the CPU will control the pci bus for, or something like
that. point is, its a redbull for your PC's pci related bandwidth/juice management and it cant
hurt to try (lets hope not j/k).
i don't recommend messing with IRQ assignments in bios or pci latency utilities unless you really
know what you're doing and consider yourself a power user, just a personal opinion, 32 is fine
and a lot of people end up regretting messing with these settings.
there is also the "turbo off" setting (think there's a "patch" for that registry setting too),
but i seriously doubt it will resolve a users problem who suffers Heavily from this syndrome, but
i guess you could try it.
Last but not least, another "ghetto" fix that could improve your issue is killing your CMSS
feature. i have no idea why that setting always acts up (at least for my machine it does) and
causes rice crispies to go off.
Its 2am on a Friday, I've been writing for a while, and i really don't know if i was clear enough
with what i said, but no way im going back to read/correct cause ill be here forever. if you've all tried this before with no luck, sorry. i'm just trying to help if
i can, and if 2 single words out of this post can even spark an idea to help fix somebodies rig, its worth it, right?
Remember to never trust anyone with anything (especially advice) or put your hopes and dreams
into a randomer's advice (such as mine!), keep in mind I'm just an average guy with no
qualifications or credentials that could be wrong about EVERY single thing i just said, i could
be completely out of my mind for all we know, listening to me could very well make your PC
explode and set your house on fire....be warned!! haha that's my surgeon generals warning for ya. GOOD NIGHT and good luck!

Here's the link to the download:
http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/audioupdate2007001.html
Mac Pro 3.0 Mac OS X (10.4.10) 4GB RAM

WRT160N wont' recognize modem and other issues

To prevent a wall of text from being even taller, here are the three topographies presented in some crude visuals:
Default, Option "A"
Better, Option "B"
Optimal, Option "C"
On second thought those images are pretty tall. That totally backfired. Enjoy the art.
Option A is the default as the installation disk would have me do. I will not work. All connection indicator lights are green (or blue in the 160N's case) for the internet connection's path. The 160N will not recognize the modem and the DHCP will not work. Yes, I went into the 192.168.1.1 control panel stuff. It's set to have the internet picked up by DHCP, and under the info tab I kept trying the drop ip and renew ip buttons. Always at 0.0.0.0. During the autosetup installation, it told me it could not detect my internet and all the connection lights showed a working connection. Using the EasyLink GUI, it could not autoresolve the issue or recognize my Westell 2110 modem it was trying to talk to. I reset the power (waiting 15 seconds before plugging it back in) on each device in every order and combination possible. I've tried different cables. Nothing works. It just won't talk with my Westell 2110.
Option B I would prefer over A as I could set up better protection from the internet. It would also solve the problem of my router and modem hating each other. It will not work. My computer refuses to find which connection is the internet when I have more than one active. The windows network wizard utility does not resolve this (yes, I set it to "this computer is a gateway" and selected the modem connection as the internet and the 160N as the connection to the rest of the LAN. Still doesn't work right). I can't seem to find anything for a setting to designate a connection as THE internet connection for Windows XP, and activating connections in different orders or reorganizing them on the CP list does nothing. It sill tries to use the 160N which has no net connection or there's some kind of address conflict when I'm 95% certain both of them are set to different addresses, as I trust what the CP connection status panel says. I've never had this problem at wired LANs. It's never happend with Adhoc either.
Option C is the optimal setup. It will not work. My Xbox 360 suffered severe hardware failure when I booted it up before even connecting anything. It was working perfectly just an hour before. I'm kind of ticked off at the universe right now. Ignoring that setback, I bought the 160N on a gamble. Either it was the V1, DD-WRT supported, or V2, DD-WRT WIP. It's a V2 which means I'll have to wait. I know that the DD-WRT frimware supports using a wireless router essentially as a wireless dongle that's cheaper than the official Xbox 360 dongle and was told it could simultaniously serve as a range extending router for the rest of my home network too. Two birds in one stone, saving me about 80$. Is it possible with the official 160N firmware to do this? Would I suffer any severe network preformance issues streaming the net across an extra dongle as compared to the default topography that goes directly to/from the 160N? All wireless adaptors in my network are 802.11N compatible.
I am uncertain on the SSID settings. I shut SSID broadcast off in the 160N control panel, but I can still pick it up on my wireless adaptors. I was told I could just shutoff the broadcast, and then someone would have to know the network was there and know the SSID to find it rather than it automatically pop up in the availible networks list. It still comes up automatically, just without a name. How do I make it "invisible"? Or was my friend who told me this just messing with me?
All my attempts to resolve issues were done at first on the revision 11 firmware, and then on the revision 8. Neither work. I have already read I should use OpenDNS with revision 8. Should I just return this router and pick up a classic WRT54G off craigslist for like 30$?
Thanks to anyone who can help.
Message Edited by Crackpot on 04-01-2009 01:07 AM

First of all who is your ISP ( Cable or DSL ).If you are trying to configure your router using the Setup disk, its better you configure it manually.
Click Here to configure your router with Cable ISP.
Click Here to configure your router with DSL ISP.

Regarding SD_ORDER_CREATE, performance issue.

Hi All,
I have a requirment where in I need to simulate the sales order based on customer and material combinations and get the pricing related data to send it across to the customers.
I am using 'SD_ORDER_CREATE' or 'PRICING' function module to get the simulated prices.
However in my case program might get run for 17000 customers and each customer needs be simulated against 60 materials. This is causing the preformance issues.
basically we can not read the database tables for the prices, becasue simulation would be give us the exact pricing infomration. Hence use of function modules is must.
Can anyone tell me the better solutions to improve the performance.
Regards,
Sanjay

Please provide an updated status if a solution was found. I encountered the same concern while running ORDER_CREATE_WWW. I tried to use the SALEORDER_SIMULATE but it did not have all the fields required for my pricing determination.
Why would the SIMULATION work better than the ORDERCREATE BAPIs?

[KDE4] Compositing issue. Screen meshed up

I've got a problem.
When KDE4 compositon is turned on and video in full screen is playing, if something pops up (PSI popup, or OSD from other programs) the screen becames messed for a second. Random fragments of images. THe same effect when KDE splash screen is active.
Turning off compositing helps.
Nvidia GF 9400. Tried other drivers - doesn't help. KDEmod 4.2.2-1
Is there any solution except turning the composition off?
Last edited by vit (2009-05-02 04:58:45)

I've encountered this problem alot of times. I've always though it was due to a preformance issue since I use the open Source Drivers. Do you use the propietary or the open source drivers. Also, as far as I know turning effects off is the only way.
You should try to use the shourcut provided to do this(Ctrl + Alt + F12), makes it alot faster.

Boot Windows 7 Off of External SSD?

So I currently have a Macbook Pro Retina (mid 2012) with 500gb of SSD. I have it split (320gb mac/180 win) because I use it for Final Cut Pro editing on the mac side and Steam/PC Gaming on the Windows side. I am considering purchasing a Transcend Jet Drive Updgrade kit to swap out my internal drive to a 960gb.
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00JKCHMP0/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_nS_ttl?_encoding=UTF8&coli d=1TN78YRCF5IMH&coliid=I3005EZ5353XU2&psc=1
I am thinking about leaving the 960gb internal as a solely Mac formatted drive and taking the leftover 500gb SSD and Transcend Casing and making it solely a Windows formatted drive. Theoretically this would mean I have a portable Windows machine, whenever I plug in the small casing via USB 3.0. This has raised some questions though...
Can you boot Windows form a USB 3.0 Externall SSD?
Will there be speed or preformance issues, specifically if I plan on gaming on the windows drive, or will it be as fast as it is usually when playing on the internal drive?

M. Video Productions wrote:
<snip>
Can you boot Windows form a USB 3.0 Externall SSD?
<snip>
No

Video shocks in full screen & freeze of finder when coping

Hi,
The last few weeks a have two problems with my "new" mac book pro (reatina).
1. When I play video's online (youtube or other provider) the play normaly in small screen but start shocking/flashin in full screen mode. It is not a preformance issue, i check the activity log, their is no heavy load active. I have the problem in Safari and in chrome and with multiple video platforms.
2. The other problem is that my finder completely freezes when i copy large files from my hard drive to a USB stick op my time capsule networkdisk. Finder will continue coping but i can not do anything in finder, i only get the "beachball" and have to wait till it is complete.
Anyone tips how to fix this?

It is possible that the white dot problem could be related to one of the sensors on the camera. The sensor(s), some cameras have one and some have three, record the information for the pixel. I know of one case where the videographer was videoing ballet dancers with a black background and noted a few white dots and that was the problem. If over time it repeats and maybe some more start to show up then that could be the cause.
The camera failure could be caused due to heat or doing a lot of recording with the gain turned up.
I'm not saying that is the problem, only that it is one possibility. Why it "disappeared" the way it did is puzzling.

Please advise on SELECT --- CORRESPONDING ...

TYPES: BEGIN OF ty_data,
       Field1 like table-field1,
       Field2 like table-field2,
       Field3 like table-field3,
            end of ty_data.
DATA: t_data TYPE TABLE OF ty_data.
SELECT field2 field3
        INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE t_data
        FROM table
                    WHERE a <> ''
                      AND b = 'CO'
                      AND c = '01'.
While I use the above SELECT statement I do not get any data in my internal table . All the columns are blanks though it shows that there are 1000 records .
SELECT field2 field3
        INTO TABLE t_data
        FROM table
                    WHERE a <> ''
                      AND b = 'CO'
                      AND c = '01'.
When I use the one above I get the data for all the 1000 records but they are not populated in the right column in the internal table .
Please advise where I am going wrong .
Also After I get all the data for field2 and field3 . I need to loop again at t_data and create a relationship between field2 and field3 which is going to be field1 = zzzz.
Please advise .
Thank you,

Do not use Corresponding field statement ( It has Preformance issue ).
First Declare your Internal Table like :
Structure
TYPES: BEGIN OF ty_data,
Field2 like table-field2,
Field3 like table-field3,
end of ty_data.
Internal Table
DATA: t_data TYPE TABLE OF ty_data.
Work Area
Data : wa_data like line of t_data.
Structure
TYPES: BEGIN OF ty_data1,
Field1 like table-field1,
end of ty_data1.
Internal Table
DATA: t_data1 TYPE TABLE OF ty_data1.
Work Area
Data : wa_data1 like line of t_data1.
Start-of-selection.
SELECT field2 field3
INTO TABLE t_data
FROM table
WHERE a <> ''
AND b = 'CO'
AND c = '01'.
Now loop your internal table
Loop at t_data into wa_data.
     Do the your comparision
    And modify the data into one more internal table
T_data1 has value now.
Endloop.
Reward Points if it is helpful
Thanks
Seshu

Standard programs for deletion of transaction data over BAPIs

Hello Experts,
What are the pros and cons of using SAP standard programs like /sapapo/rlcdelete etc. over the SAP provided BAPIs (e.g. BAPI_PIRSRVAPS_DELMULTI in case of PIRs). What would be called as best approach when run in regular background jobs for a large number of SKUs.

Hi Ankit,
As per me it should be performed by the using report if it is there like /SAPAPO/RLCDELETE as it is standard program and tested program provided by SAP. BAPI may create preformance issue.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Speed up your Booklet 3G the right way

I bought this booklet and was not impressed at all with the preformance issues. After a little work, here are some things that helped speed the machine up.
ReadyBoost; I got an 8gb SD card, used the disk utility to reformat the card to NTFS from FAT32, and dedicated the entire 8gb to use with the ready boost feature.
Windows home premium upgrade; this one is personal, but I think that microsoft made win 7 starter slower than the other win 7 products. It is my observation only, but hey take it for what its worth. the upgrade was an additional $80.
my GeekBench Score is 867 with the upgrades, it was 754 before.
I also tweaked the startup programs and services using msconfig. I got rid of everything except the core services, or anything necessary for the laptop to start-up correctly.
I use chrome for my browser, and it seems to be the fastest for me.
Lastly, I changed a few of the animation features in the advanced display settings menu.
So the little laptop now works 3 times better in my own tests. For example, Before the upgrades it took 2 minutes to start up to the desktop from completely off. Now i can cycle thru a restart with several programs running back to the home screen in the same 2 minutes.
my "always running" program list...
-Outlook 2010 Beta
-Skype (rwhamm4 if you wanna talk about tech)
-Google Maps (if you didnt know your GPS works in google maps. Just push the hardly visible little circle just above the street view man on top of the zoom slider. When on, the circle turns blue. It wont follow your position, but its better than OVI Maps).
If anyone has any information to help speed up the booklet, please let me know, Im sure all of us would like it.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

bdish wrote:
I want my booklet to run faster as well. What is Aero or Aero Peek and Snap? Do I need it? Is there anything else I could turn off or uninstall (something I decide I don't need)?
Also- I swear the rep - actually 2 reps at local Best Buy said that the Booklet was expandable to 2G!!!
they lied!
best buy is big-box retail outlet, not a specialized location for that type of knowledge.
actually, you bought it at best buy and the wireless section you bought it from is a co-owned/joint business with best buy and carphone warehouse out of UK.
most of those guys dont even know that thier brochures for thier unlocked handsets they sell are incorrect with the phone stats that are listed. so dont expect them to know much about the booklet 3g unless they are a true ub er geek....which most all of them are not.
the memory is not upgradeable on this unit, but the hdd can be swapped very easily to a ssd which will speed up your unit enough to make it so that you cannot even use the ready boost becuase it does no good and you can run the win7 pro with everything running normally (aero and all other programs) and it works fine, even on the 1gb. still cannot compare to the power you may have with a desktop, but a smokin' little netbook.

Can I use same result set for two queries?

Hi,
Can I use the same result set for two queries?
For example:
ResultSet rs = null;
rs = ps.executeQuery(query1);
while (rs.next()) {
rs = ps.executeQuery(query2);
while (rs.next()) {
Is it OK to use? or Is there any preformance issues?
Appreciate your help.
Thanks in advance.
Prasad Vagolu

Sure. You have a variable of ResultSet type. First you create a ResultSet and assign it to that variable. Then later you create another ResultSet and assign it to that same variable. Assigning an object reference to a variable takes essentially no time, and at any rate it isn't any faster to assign it to a different variable. Also, no matter whether you use one variable or two, you are still creating two ResultSets.
However, you really should be closing your ResultSets after you finish using them. That's nothing to do with the assigning-to-a-variable question.

Preformance issues

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for