Premiere CS4 question from dummy

I searched and can't find the answer so any help would be appreciated.
My workspace in Premiere is all messed up and I cannot figure out why. I would like to reset to the default settings which are all I use however I can't find this function. The "reset workspace" does nothing. I can't stand this "save settings on exit" thing where if you move a panel it stays that way.
I do not know what the name of the panel is where you drop your video into (that goes in the bottom left corner) where you do your effects and stuff. I can't find anything on the web that tells you the names of the panels or how to get it back to the factory setting and of course the book tells me nothing. It can't be this hard to find out what should be a simple thign.  I've tried everything in the Windows menu but none of them appears to be that panel. What is it called or how do I get the program to go back to the regular facotry default which is all I want. Thanks for any assistance.

Here you will find all the names of the panels and more.
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/PremierePro/4.0/WS4C20B718-E29E-41ee-B3D0-0CD37A1D94F7.html

Similar Messages

  • Premiere CS4 Crashes From Photoshop?

    Hi,
    I have a few photoshop files in my Premiere Pro CS4 timeline. If I open the photoshop file from Premiere, and then change and save the file in Photoshop, Premiere Pro will become unresponsive ("Not Responding", I'm on Windows 7), and I'll have to force quit Premiere.
    Is there a way to make it stop crashing? If it's any help, I've already figured out that it will only crash if the file is in the timeline.
    Thanks,
    --Saib

    I think it is better to do your photo editing/sizing before you bring the picture into Premiere
    Photo Scaling for Video http://forums.adobe.com/thread/450798
    -Too Large May = Crash http://forums.adobe.com/thread/879967
    -And another crash report http://forums.adobe.com/thread/973935

  • Premiere Cs4 handle CPU...performance...and idiot questions

    Ok, i tried to read as much as i could, performance threads about Premiere Cs4...but couldn't help it.
    So i upgraded to Production Premium Cs4 before 2 weeks...
    I've noticed all the problems that were mentioned...what i can't understand is the LOW PERFOMANCE in export or preview
    my system runs a QUAD 6600 with 8gbs RAM, NVIDIA 8800GT and XP64...
    after effects runs fine in almost maximum CPU (if you adjust it in preferences), but premiere (that means and ABOBE MEDIA encoder) exports in 5-20% of the CPU...if you try to encode with TMPGEnc processes go much faster and cpu is quite high...
    question 1) (yes i know i am dumb...)
    exporting speed has to do with footage, type of media that is being exporting and GPU??????
    2)is my system, just not enough???
    3)Premiere CS4 cannot handle multicore anyway...and every user here has the same problems??????
    Sometimes...i think that i will do BAD things in my PC when PREMIERE is SO SLOW and i am in such hurry...Someone...coould answer? before i start taking drugs????????????????
    A Straight answer 1) ,2) ,3) would be really nice for my emotional condition...

    Roger thank you very much!
    It is now starting to make sense. I have only run it once and not tried any other tricks yet (like trying to use the Source from the RAID array rather than from the C: drive)
    Now rather than taking 130 seconds for encoding it is down to 25 seconds versus 8 seconds for CS3. I suspect that at least some of that is because they are using the C: drive for the source.
    MPEG encoding has also a major improvement by using the rendered preview files and as matter of fact it reduced the MPEG encoding time from 75 seconds (CS3) to 57 seconds (CS4)! Maybe we will have to go back to suggesting rendering the timeline before any encoding.
    One other plus for CS4 is that the rendering is much smarter in that any duplicate segments are rendered only one time.
    Why do they hide these menus with such tiny hard to find icons? I had a similar problem finding a playback option for my second monitor.

  • Premiere CS4. Video-individual images freeze. abrupt change from frame to frame.

    Hi
    I'm working with Adobe Premiere CS4... windows XP prof SP3 4GB RAM. ATI Radeon 38XX Graphic
    my problem is as following: working window: the projection of individual frames in a movie doesn't run smoothly, the change from frame  to frame is abrupt, almost robotic...it also freezes occasionally .. sound is fine though.
    I've reinstalled all recent graphic and sound drivers and also latest updates but the problem is still there...
    Please advice A:S:A:P
    Thanks,
    Elena

    Work through all of the steps (ideas) listed at http://ppro.wikia.com/wiki/Troubleshooting
    If your problem isn't fixed after you follow all of the steps, report back with ALL OF THE DETAILS asked for in the FINALLY section, the questions at the end of the troubleshooting link... most especially the codec used... see Question 1
    Read Harm on drive setup http://forums.adobe.com/thread/662972?tstart=0
    - click the embedded picture in Harm's message to enlarge to reading size

  • Adobe soundbooth cs4 hangs when called from premiere cs4 in windows 7 64 bit

    Whenever I try to edit a soundfile from within premiere cs4 Soundbooth starts and then hangs on my Windows 7 Pro 64-bit machine; works fine in XP pro.

    I discovered the problem only occurs once I try to open an mp3 file in Soundbooth CS4 from within Premiere CS4 and Sounddbooth is not already running.  
    If I open Soundbooth before I try to open an mp3 or any sound file in Soundbooth CS4 from within Premiere CS4 then there are no problems.  So the workaround is easy: start Soundbooth before I try to edit soundfiles form within Premiere.
    Question: are you using 64 bit Windows 7?

  • PREMIERE CS4 browse frame auto skip QUESTION

    RESPECT  TEACHER：
                      FIRST ,SORRY FOR MY POOR ENGLISH。
                      I USED THE EXCELLENT SOFT WARE  PREMIERE IN  COMPANY。LATELY ，COMPANY UPDATE PERMIERE PRO 1.5 TO CS4。
                      NOW，QUESTION CAME。。。 IN THE TIMELINE ,I BROWSE THE VIDEO STUFF。。。THE FRAME AUTO SKIP PROBLEME APPEARED。I  CAPTURED VIDEO IN 1394 AT PAL .NOT IMPORT FROM ANOTHER PLACE。AND THAT I PLAY THE CAPTURED VIDEO IN MANY
    KINDS OF PLAYERS ALL NORMAL。I PUSH → OR← TO BROWSE VIDEO STUFF IN TIMELINE ALL NORMAL。
                      BUT I PUSH  SPACEBAR BUTTON 。。。。THE  FRAME AUTO SKIP PROBLEME APPEARED。。。
                      I FINDED A  APPERANCE。NOT VIDEO STUFF IN TIMELINE ,I  PUSH SPACEBAR BUTTON TO RUN THE TIMELINE. THE FRAME AUTO SKIP PROBLEME YET。。。。
                      MY COMPUTER HARDWARE NO PROBLEME . CPU E7300. HARDDISK 500G,64M. 9600GT。 AND ALL ENCODER ALMOST IN SYSTEM.
                      IN PRO 1.5 TIME.NO THIS PROBLEME.BUT IN CS4.....NIGHTMARE CAME。。。
                      MANY WORK WAIT ME TO FINISH.......THE BOSS VERY GHASTLINESS。I REQUESTED  BUY PREMIERE CS4 FOR THE WORK.....
                      PLEASE HELP ME.
                                                                                                                                                           A POOR FISH。

    ANY FRIENDS NOT SEE THE PROBLEME ? ADOBE ENGINNER HELP ME .

  • Export .avi from Mac Premiere CS4

    I need to export or somehow achieve an end product of an .avi file from my Mac Premiere CS4. Can anyone help?

    Either get a PC for that job or export as MOV and convert to an AVI wrapper.

  • Why no bit-rate control when encoding from Premiere CS4?

    Recently upgraded to CS4 from CS3 on my HP-9300 workstation. When encoding for DVD from the Premiere CS4 timeline I've noticed that there are no options for adjusting bit-rate. This functionality was available for the PC on CS3, why is it missing from CS4? Am I doing something wrong?
    Thanks.
    Spencer

    PC.
    Win 7.
    When you export (File\Export\Multimedia Files) a window appear, and you click on Video (just under your encoding spec.).
    A wider window appears and if you scroll down a bit you'll see your bitrate settings, of course you can modify them.
    Ciao
    Giorgio

  • Why does Premiere CS4 fail to import video files from my Samsung Galaxy Note 3?

    I've acquired a Samsung Galaxy Note 3. It takes supherb HD video 1920x1080. But when I attempt to import the clips in Premiere CS4, I get the unsupported file error message. Am I missing a format spec in my project setup menu list? Or do I have to convert the files before importing and with what?

    Codec & Format information, read both links in reply #1 http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1270588
    Report back with the codec details of your file, use the programs below... A screen shot works well to SHOW people what you are doing
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/592070?tstart=30 for screen shot instructions
    Find file information for PC/Mac http://mediaarea.net/en/MediaInfo/Download

  • Premiere CS4 - Encoding with AME ridiculously slow

    Hello there.
    After having read many threads on various forums, I have not come to a single hint as to why AME is encoding any type of video materal extremely slow. I'm sorry if this question has been asked many times on this forum, but maybe someone has come up with a working solution?
    My computer specifications are:
    Windows Vista 32bit (yes I know, upgrade is needed)
    Intel Quad Core Q9000 @ 2 GHz
    4 GB RAM
    Nvidia GeForce 9700M GT - 512mb
    500GB sATA HDD @ 5400 rpm
    This is a notebook. I use Premiere CS4 and AME4 with the most current updates (v4.1)
    Here is what I usually do:
    I export my project media from Premier to AME with the appropriate format and encoder settings, close Premiere and kill all background tasks. My RAM usage is now at around 1.4 GB (out of 3 GB!).
    In this case, I'd use the built-in MPEG2 codec with PAL settings (720x576 - 25i - 8Mbit/sec), the source file is in MPEG4 @ 20Mbit and 10 minutes long. I started the encoding process and it was slowing down from 10 minutes initially to a frustrating render time of 60 minutes. Why?
    I have used VirtualDub and TMPGEnc, both achieved, compared to AME, incredibly low render times, a bit higher than double realtime. When I use AME the same way, as encoder for an avi file only and not a Premiere project, it is losing by 6-7 times of the other programs render time.
    Second scenario:
    I have 20 seconds uncompressed avi material (600Mbit/sec) and like to convert it to MPEG4 with AME. MPEG4 settings are at 50Mbit, I-frames only, 50fps and progressive. I started the encoding again and at first, AME was rushing through 1/4th of the progress bar in 5 seconds, and then slowing down to an overall encoding time of 50 (!) minutes and it ended about 52 minutes later.
    During this rendering I had the windows resourcemonitor (of the taskmanager) open and checked the access rate to my hard disk. For the entire duration of 50 minutes, AME read between 50 megabyte and 125 megabyte per second on the hard disk. The file itself was less than 2 GB large - what on earth could it read? Also, my RAM usage came close to 2,8 GB but never reached 3 GB or higher.
    Does anyone have an idea or is it just that freeware programs are superior to a costly AME?

    I have already run that test about 4 hours prior to writing this thread. Now I'm not at this computer, but from top of my head the results were:
    Total 180 (about)
    Export Avi 38 (not entirely certain, could be up to 10 higher)
    Encode MPEG 90 (not entirely certain, could be 20 lower or higher)
    Render Time 7 (the only number I recall correctly)
    I'm well aware my hard disk isn't fast - but why should VirtualDub be able to encode a 2gb uncompressed avi clip with a duration of 20 seconds to DivX in about a 1/3rd real time/8fps (using 50mbit, i-frames and 50fps and amazing quality) while AME takes 50 minutes (1/200th realtime) for the same file with the integrated MPEG4 encoder?
    Now, I know that those are different codecs, yet their data reduction works on a similar base. From my point of view, there's not much that could explain such a high discrepancy of performance on the hardware side, other than AME just does not like my computer configuration. I know my computer is very capable to perform way better than that, just with about any other program but AME, and that is a royal pain.
    Unfortunately, I am unable to install a second HDD in this notebook, because it is full. I do know it could perform better using a secondary HDD, but I have also encoded files with Adobe Premiere CS3, and that performed way better than CS4 on the same computer.

  • What's hardware should upgrade for Using Premiere CS4 to editing (AVCHD)m2ts file?

    What's hardware or software should upgrade for Using Premiere CS4 to editing (AVCHD)m2ts file?
    1st question: when i try to do editing by using Premiere CS4 AVCHD sequence timeline, the edting monitor seems not smooth (like wearing goggles) & delay, and when i use AME to encode m2ts file (which not yet edit) to AVI file (about 1 hour), it take 2h 13min to finish, is it normal?
    2nd question: i use mpeg2 HD 1440 file to do eding, the edting monitor also not very smooth but better than using m2ts file, after editing done, i try to encode these mpeg2 HD 1440 file (which edited about long 1 hr) to a New file mpeg2 1440 X 1080i HQ or even mpeg2 Pal DV HQ file, the encoding was not runthe encoding after wait for half an hour. How many hours it take usually????
    3rd question: i use m2ts file video file to export as a Bitmap, 1 frame 1 picture bitmap, it take long time too, about 1 or 2min to finish encoding, if i export more than 1 picture, it take even more time, i have experienced it, 3 or 4 pictures need about 10 or 15 min to finish encoding. i used to using mpeg2 HD 1440 file (which edited file) to export frame as picture, it not run the encoding at all. WHY ????
    i'm new in Premiere CS4,so i got many question about Premiere CS4, usually i use Premiere Pro 1.5 version
    my computer is: Intel (R) Core (TM) 2 Duo CPU
                             E7400 @ 2.80 GHz
                             2.80 GHz, 2.00 GB RAM
                             Graphic Card: ATI Radeon X1650 series
                            2 Hard Disks in my computer (C Drive is 300 GB (not sata) , D Drive is 500 GB sata)
    4th Question: Premiere CS5 & Premiere CS4 which one is better ???
    5th Question: What's different ATI Radeon and NVIDIA Card, which is better, which u suggest to. What is different Graphic Card and Video Card ?? Should i install HD Video Card ????

    I don't think a core-2 will work very well with AVCHD... you need at least an Intel i7 920... or whatever is current
    My CS5/AVCHD 1st Impressions http://forums.adobe.com/thread/652694?tstart=0 includes a link to the computer I built... since the GTX 285 is no longer sold, I would now go with a GTX 460 or whatever is the current "best bang for the buck" - AND I would buy 4Gig-by-3Sticks memory to be able to expand from 12Gig to 24Gig if needed
    For my home hobbyist, family movies (which means that I am not trying to recreate Star Wars with video effects or many layers) AVCHD editing is "as smooth as spreading warm butter on hot toast" (also the MP4 video from wife's Flip camera)
    My 3 hard drives are configured as...
    1 - 320G WD Win7 and all programs
    2 - 320G WD Win7 swap file and PPro projects
    3 - 1T WD all video files... read and write

  • Best Video Card for non 3d/compositing work in Premiere CS4?

    Hi all, I'm looking to optimize my system where I can to speed up the editing process. I edit 1080p footage from the Canon 5D MKII (h.264 MOV files)using half-res h.264 proxies, but CS4 seems to hang a lot in the timeline view and clips just disappear and instead show green. I'm switching to half-res MPEG-2 (.m2v) proxies now and so far that problem seems to have gone away (still testing), but when timeline display quality is at "High Quality" (vs. automatic) there's still some chop during slow pans (not seen with "Automatic" or "Draft Quality").
    Anyway, I'm looking for the weakest point in my system and suspect the video card. My system is an 2.66 i7 processor, 6GB 1333 ram, 1x160GB sata II HD (OS/Apps), 3x1TB SATA II RAID 0 (paging file, data), and an $80 ATI 4650 512 MB video card running Vista 64.
    So all that said, what's the best general graphics card for editing HD video in Premiere CS4? I don't care about 3d or compositing at this stage, just basic editing of unrendered (timeline playback) HD video, maybe sometimes 1-3 HD layers, some basic color correction effects (b+w, contrast, etc), dissolves, text overlay, some clip speed manipulation.
    Many seem to recommend the Nvidia quadro cards, but I haven't found any information to suggest they help with anything other than 3D/compositing, which I don't need (and therefore don't need to pay the premium).
    There's also the Nvidia CX card, but it's main feature is touted as encoding h.264, whereas I could care less about that and ideally need decoding of h.264 in the timeline to be better. I haven't seen any great reviews on this card of heard of average user testimonials, probably because it's $2k and it mainly marketed as "zoom more fluidly in photoshop, export h.264 4x faster", which seem like minor issues vs. "better realtime playback of HD video".
    I sort of rambled, but if any informed CS4 users can help answer the question regarding the best video card for general CS4 editing use (not 3d/compositing stuff) I'd love to get more insight.

    So in Media Encoder CS4, I tried encoding one of the clips that plays back the least smooth in the Premiere timeline (a slow pan across intricate patterns on a sand dune in death valley) to the following:
    Format: P2 Movie, Preset: DVCPRO HD 720P 30
    (this was the only format in media encoder that mentions DVCPRO HD)
    I noticed when trying to customize the setting, that there is no 30 fps option, just 23.976, 29.97, and 59.94. I just went with 29.97 as that was the closest to the 30 fps of the source MK II footage. The width and height were also unajustable at 960x720 for the DVCPRO HD format.
    Playing the output in the timeline view of Premiere was comparable in smoothness to the m2v file. I looked at my resource monitor during playback looking for bottlenecks, and the CPU does seem to spike at 100% initially when playing this clip back. I reverted to the m2v version and also saw the same CPU spike. I also reverted back to the down-res'd mp4 version, same spike. Moving display quality down to draft does allow for smooth playback here.
    So I guess there's something about this clip that is CPU intensive to play back in the timeline in any of these formats. The original 1080p version plays back perfectly in both quicktime and VLC player.
    Anyway, for now I think I'm content with using the m2v proxies as a big chunk of the clips are fairly smooth, and using a reduced quality display mode for clips that don't play as smoothly is accpeptable for now. At least so far I'm not seeing the hanging/video not displaying (and instead showing a green screen) that I was with the mp4 proxies.
    If anyone has any other suggestions as to how to get smoother timeline playback for these proxies (or the original h.264 .MOV files), however, whether it be a hardware upgrade (e.g. better video card) or a different proxy codec, I'd love to hear them and give it a shot.

  • Premiere CS4 vs Full HD YouTube (BEST quality) settings?

    Windows Vista Premium (32-bit)
    Adobe Premiere Pro CS4 (Version 4.2)
    Hello. I have a problem. I've been using this settings to save my work for youtube:
    http://img52.imageshack.us/img52/6816/settingsr.png
    Now, here is a quality that I get with it:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2teDL4MPS_8
    I've been playing around with the settings and somehow today I saved this file:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMBixEnweWQ
    I have no idea what I've changed, but the quality difference is significant!!!
    I know the text is a little tiny bit smaller in the better quality one and it was move a couple of pixels, but that's not the point. I am 100% sure it has to do something with the settings.
    Here are properties for both files:
    http://img821.imageshack.us/img821/9373/propertiesz.png
    It is kind off strange because a "Good Quality.mp4" files has a better quality over "Bad Quality.mp4" yet it has a smaller Size as well as Data rate and Total bitrate (highlighted in red)
    I've even tried doing this hoping it would increase the quality. Maybe it did, but not significantly. Not nearly as good as the "Good Quality.mp4"
    http://img831.imageshack.us/img831/4366/settings2.png
    Here is a GSpot screen shot as well:
    http://img689.imageshack.us/img689/7506/gspot.png
    What could be an issue? Can you guys help me work my settings in Adobe Premiere CS4? It is one of those situations where I don't care about files size... I want to quality and I wanted it the finest.
    Thanks... All help is greatly appreciated...

    Hi,
    I'm back...made dinner and took a break...
    I hope you bear with me on this as I really would like to see you get good results...and there's no reason why a title couldnt be loaded up to youtube with good results..
    First off, a rule of thumb about video editing is this...
    1) project settings match the source footage.
    That's something it took me a while to learn but I finally did ( from people helping me here in fact ).
    Another sorta general rule is that what you export would be about the same as your project settings ( same frame rate, same type of video (interleaved or progressive), same aspect ratio ( 4:3 or 16:9 ) and so on.  The biggest difference in exporting is the type of delivery format ( mpeg 2 for DVD or mpeg 4 for web and that sort of thing...which means the codec you choose for export will be related to the final product usage.
    Also, and this happens a lot....you can downsize the video to a smaller size...like go from HD to SD for a DVD instead of Blue Ray.  Orrrrr, downsize video to play on a hand held device ( ipod ) etc.
    Sooo, basically what you first do generally is create a project that matches your source footage.  In the case of DV NTSC it would look something like this:
    720x480, 29.97 fps ( which is how 30fps interleaved works because of a timing mark in the frame - when to start the next field scan --so its not exactly 30fps ) --- aspect ratio 4:3, interleaved, bottom field first , and so on.
    As you can see from the general "specs" most of the important and outstanding things about the video in that format of describing it, most people will talk about their video source specs the same sorta way.
    Like, 1920x1080 24p ( means HD progressive 24 FPS - the "P" after 24 means progressive )
    The best results for export usually follow the source and project specs very closely.  You CAN make an interleaved video progressive, but you have to half the size ( frame dimensions ) to do that and make it look good, because when you go to progressive you lose one field....lose half the resolution..
    So lets say I start a project that is DV NTSC like you did...and made a title...
    That is going to be 720x480 29.97 fps interleaved ( or progressive ) 4:3 aspect ratio OR 16:9.  If interleaved it will be bottom field first, if progressive it will be NO FIELDS.  The pixel aspect ratio is weird and depends on whether it is 4:3 or 16:9 and if I remember right neither one is square pixel.  Sooo, this gives you the general idea what the project settings can be.
    You could tell us exactly what your project settings are ( since theres no source video no need to worry about that for now ...can deal with that when you do get some video ....for now we can just get it exported well for the title )
    Your project settings will tell us what would be BEST for exporting for YouTube...but I would bet that if you match DV NTSC with the YouTube preset to export DV NTSC as Ann mentioned earlier you would get GREAT results !
    The problem so far has been trying to UPSCALE to HD from SD.  That's why it has been geting blurry.
    Now, just so you know....you can make a brand new project that is in fact HD ...and do a title and then export THAT to youtube also...as HD, without losing any quality also....but you need to set the project settings for HD first.
    I hope this helps a little and sorry my head was spinning around earlier ...please don't hesitate to ask more questions...OK ?
    ps... because you are only dealing with a title ( which is a bit different than actual video ) you may in fact get decent results upscaling to HD from SD...but you really shouldn't get used to doing that ...as you can just as easily create the HD project, make the title and use the YouTube preset Ann gave you...and it will be beautiful !

  • Premiere CS4 Quick render

    Windows 7 Ultimate
    Premiere CS4
    Ram 6MB
    Working with 1920x1080 footage
    Gentlemen !
    I am working on a 5 mnis song , each time I send it to AME to render or export to AME it takes atleast 5 to 6 hours to render, Obviuosly I try to stay native with my output file, but sometimes I choose DV NTSC for the output file.
    My question is, is there any way to choose a different format for output file, that would take less time to render ? I mean just to check my colors and effects and etc.
    What i mean by that is ,my system is not that powerful to handle HD footage very well, so I have to render my footage so I can check all effects and etc.

    About if I change the output file's size to a smaller size ?
    the prob with that is that you're still dealing with your original asset(s) ( video) and now compressing it and downscaling it etc, and the program has to work pretty hard to do all those calculations and make the product...( like h264 or wmv or whatever )
    so its still the same problem re: strain on your computer stuff and time involved....plus you wont know for sure if that "translation" is gonna be as good product re: transistions etc...
    lets say you have effects that need the program to "tween" frames..create frames in between your original frames...well....in the math etc and compression algorithyms ( sp? ) that makes that happen from one codec to another is different...and maybe your "color" and overall quality wont give you an " honest" translation compared to if you just export for your final product ( the high res ). Plus, to do the downscaling and so on is actually MORE of a strain on resources maybe...its not a given that by making it smaller it is gonna take less time to export...might take LONGER
    know what I mean?  it might be close and good enough for what you want to do with your particular output...but I wouldnt trust it myself if I had to give it to someone and stand by it ...
    so youre stuck with long exports is what it sounds like, and thank goodness you can even get THAT done !

  • Is the Minnetonka ac3 5.1 surcode in Premiere CS4?

    Hello,
    Is the Minnetonka ac3 5.1 surcode in Premiere CS4?
    I just loaded Premiere CS4 on a new Vista Ultimate machine that has never had my older versions on Premiere on it, then I loaded up my old CS3 projects with 5.1 audio and I dont have the encoder as an available option. My older Win XP Pro machine with Premiere versions 1.5, 2 and CS3 all have the surcode available.
    I purchased the Minnetonka 5.1 surcode sometime ago with my Premiere 1.5.
    Do I need to install some older version of Premiere on my new machine in order to have surcode available?
    thanks,
    Don

    >I'm getting sort of a run around from Adobe support.
    What did they say?
    >I purchased the Minnetonka 5.1 surcode
    Have you checked with Minnetonka?
    Cheers
    Eddie
    PremiereProPedia   (
    RSS feed)
    - Over 300 frequently answered questions
    - Over 250 free tutorials
    - Maintained by editors like
    you
    Forum FAQ

Maybe you are looking for