Prevent iViews from displaying their own scrollbars

Hi,
does anybody know how to allow vertical scrolling in pages exclusively by using the browser's vertical scrollbar (e.g. as it is realized in the SDN portal) respectively how to prevent iViews from displaying their own scrollbars?
Regards,
Christoph

Hi Christoph,
to turn off scrolling has certainly something to do with setting the height and height-type of an iView. But as discussed in this thread Automatic Height of iView/Page & Footer in Framework page
there is probably a bug in the EP. I have tried some combinations and had no luck either. In the forum thread is some javascript proposed. I haven't had time to check it out. But maybe it is some help to your problem.
regards,
Ulli

Similar Messages

Is there a way to prevent an end-user from changing their own password?

All you guru's out there, I need your help. Is there a way to prevent an end-user from changing their own password? Is there a function or procedure I can create or what?

In this case, you do not want someone (whoever they are DBA etc) to connect as that
particuler user to change the password.Yes, but I wouldn't expect the users to[i] know that password. The connnect would be handled automatically, behind the scenes.
The clear implication of the OP's question and response was that users would not be allowed to change their own passwords. I'm guessing this is in response to a policy that says users mustn't have simple passwords like 123abc or mom. In such a scenario a better approach would be to apply regexp to a user's password to ensure it contains a mix of letters, numbers, punctuation, etc to achieve the desired level of complexity.
So questions, should not be regarded as daft Agreed, but the same is unfortunately not always true of business decisions. As the OP has told us not to ask we cannot know why they want to do this. Personally, I think a user's individual password should always be their responsibility; anything else strikes me as insecure. YMMV.
Cheers, APC

To prevent user from droping his own object .

Dear User
I have a database user like "aaa" in oracle 7.3.4.0.1 database.i do not want user "aaa" to drop his own schema objects like table and any other objects that he is owner.Do i have any system privilege to stop this user from doing so.User should be able to create objects and modify object but not to drop his own objects.For this purpose i have created a database trigger at database level to stop user "aaa" for doing above action.this trigger is giving me error on creation in oracle 7.3.4.0.1 .But when i tried same trigger in oracle 8i and 9i it work well.In oracle 8i and 9i it is preventing user from droping his own objects but i get other errors also along with raised error in trigger which i want to stop .The error which i am raising in trigger is
ORA-20001 INVALID COMMAND BUT OTHER TWO ERRORS THAT R RAISED AUTOMATICALLY ARE
ORA-00604 ERROR OCCURED AT RECURSIVE SQL LEVEL 1
AND
ORA-06512 AT LINE 8
I WANT TO STOP THESE TWO ERRORS .
PLZ HELP ME IN THIS REGARD AS SOON AS POSSBILE .
plz tell me is there any system privilege to stop user from droping his own object or any other way along with trigger at database level.
Thank u.

Hi
DBAs can use PRODUCT_USER_PROFILE (in system schema) to disable certain SQL and SQL*Plus commands in the SQL*Plus environment on a per-user basis. SQL*Plus, not Oracle, enforces this security. DBAs can even restrict access to the GRANT, REVOKE, and SET ROLE commands in order to control users' ability to change their database privileges.
The PRODUCT_USER_PROFILE table enables you to list roles which you do not want users to activate with an application. You can also explicitly disable use of various commands, such as SET ROLE. For example, you could create an entry in the PRODUCT_USER_PROFILE table to:
read more about this at
http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/server.920/a90842/ch10.htm#1005648

How to prevent users to create their own private list ?

Hello,
Is there a way to prevent users to create their own private list ?
Or to perform their own queries ?
Thanks for your help.

Any list or search will always query the database regardless of volume. For example, a user has access to just 1 account record. This record could be one of 10 million other account records. To allow the user to see this record, the entire account pool will be queried. That's where indexes help and queries are really fast.
Turning off search is not the solution. Ensuring queries are optimized is the solution. For example, manager visibility always slows down the search because the nature of a manager visibility search requires compex search patterns. So you could turn off manager visibility for your company and use alternate means like books. Manager visibility search is a feature that's primarily used by small-to-medium-business (SMBs). Large enterprises should never use it.

How do I prevent users from caching their sign in credentials on OWA page

I am using Forms based authentication and want to prevent users from caching their credentials on the OWA page.
Is there an easy way?

Hi,
Forms-based authentication enables a sign-in page for Outlook Web App that uses a cookie to store a user's encrypted sign-in credentials in the Internet browser. So this authentication method will force to cache their credentials in the Internet
browser for some time. The workaround is what Willard Martin suggested.
Refer from
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb430796(v=exchg.141).aspx
Best Regards.

How to prevent LOV from displaying duplicates

Hi all. I'm using JDev 10.1.3. I have a af:selectOneChoice component which is used to set search criteria. There are a few records with duplicate values. Is there a way for me to prevent the LOV from displaying duplicate values? thanks in advance.
<af:selectOneChoice
     value="#{bindings.UserAckAnnualBalancesView1EdcDescription.inputValue}"
        label="EDC Description"
        valueChangeListener="#{backingExecuteBtn.alterEdcDescSearchVal}">
        <f:selectItems value="#{bindings.UserAckAnnualBalancesView1EdcDescription.items}"/>
</af:selectOneChoice>

John. I assume that you are suggesting that I do a SELECT DISTINCT. If so, then no I cannot change the underlying query. I want all the records, what I am actually looking for is a way to filter the items in the LOV.

GPO: CD and DVD: Deny write access prevents user from using their USB Pen drive, but other users or ok

My Users have secure pen drives that launch a CDROM partition with a secure logon app that decrypts the main USB mass storage element of the pen drive on successful logon. The problem I have is that users who install the usb pen drive cannot then
initialize the CDROM launcher app to input their password to access the mass storage element of the pen drive making it useless.
However, any other user that has the same type of pen drive who then plugs it in to the endpoint that already has the drivers installed is able to access their own pen drive or the other users pen drive (providing the know the password).
So I've isolated the problem being down to the presence of the GPO setting stated above on the Removable Storage Access Policy, and by not having this policy in place when a user installs the pen drive they have no issues, but I can't find a way to clean
up a user who is already broken even if I remove the GPO from that user, delete their local profile so that they logon as a new user (no roaming or other data) and use a variety of utilities such as USBOblivion to clear out the registry and file system of
the USB device and installation. When the original user logs back on and then installs the usb pen drive again they have the same issue, but no other users do. I have the same issue if I try this with an alternative user or admin as the first user after the
'clean up'. Everyone else can use the pen drive except the user that originally installed it when the GPO was in place.
If I move the user to a new endpoint or rebuild their endpoint then they have no problem being the installer of the usb pen drive and then using it since the GPO was removed, so what I need to know is what is it about the USB install and the GPO that
is tattooing in Windows somewhere and how do I remove it?

Hi,
In my opinion, this is probably not Windows GPO problem. To confirm the suppose, you can follow the path below to check GPO settings if there is any change after the software installed.
Computer Configuration\Administrative Templates\System\Removable Storage Access
User Configuration\Administrative Templates\System\Removable Storage Access
These two policy manage system and current user Removable Storage access.
If there is no change with these policy, it would be better to contact the manufacture of the driver for further assistance.
Roger Lu
TechNet Community Support

[E2013][C#] How to prevent user from updating its own events on Exchange

Hi everybody,
I hope you can help me. I have a system based on Exchange / Outlook 2013, and I would like to put on user's calendar some events that they can't delete nor update. I have tried to create appointments using
Exchange EWS with an administrator account, but the problem is that those events can be deleted or updated by users. This is because the events are on user's own calendar, so usually user can update them.
How can I have "some" events to be readonly for a user, but must be visibile in its own calendar? (No other calendar overlay). Is there a way to throw an exception or something similar on Exchange Server when a user modify those events
(some custom property must identify them, of course)? I have looked at transport agents, but I haven't found any example for managing calendar items server side.
I cannot use only an Outlook plugin because users could connect to exchange with smartphone, and they could update appointments from there. I have to prevent updating (from Outlook and from smartphone, basically from everywhere except for
an administrator user) for some events (programmatically created by EWS, for example) which are in user's calendar. Can you help me?
Thanks,
Antonio

Hi Antonio,
bad news for you: It's impossible. A User always has full control over all items in his or her mailbox (including his calendar), no matter what you do.
If it's important enough to you, you can write a service that monitors all those specific appointments and undos all changes the user applies to them (it won't keep the user from changing the Appointment, but it will not have effect for long. Your users
may feel a bit upset about that though).
Cheers,
Fred
There's no place like 127.0.0.1

How to Restrict Subscriber from displaying his own Stream?

How to pass opponent UserID to Subscriber ???
private function displayExistingStreams():void
{     var publishers:Object = _streamManager.getStreamsOfType(StreamManager.CAMERA_STREAM);
    //status_txt.text += "displayExistingStreams";
    for (var publisherID:String in publishers) {
        if (publisherID !=_userManager.myUserID) {
            setUpSubscriber(publisherID);
protected function setUpSubscriber(p_publisherID:String):void {
    currentSubscriber = new WebcamSubscriber();
    currentSubscriber.displayUserBars=true;
    currentSubscriber.connectSession = cSession ;
    currentSubscriber.subscribe();
     // publisherIDs used for restricting the list of publishers     that this subscriber should display videos for.
    currentSubscriber.publisherIDs = [p_publisherID];

Hi ,
You need to loop over userIDs from userManager.userCollection and get all userIDs and set webcamSubscriber.publisherIDs to all IDs except your own. And you need to update this everytime an user enters or leaves the room ( by listening to UserEvent.USER_CREATE and UserEvent.USER_REMOVE from UserManager, if you want to dynamically maintain this publisherIDs list)
I have replied this in other forum messages earlier.
Hope this helps
Thanks
Hironmay Basu

Preventing images from displaying in email messages

New to Mac. Not a month yet. In the process of getting set up on my machine somewhere back there it took a picture of me and put it in my entry in the Addressbook. Now when I send mail my address includes the picture.
I don't want the picture. I've tried to delete it from the Addressbook without success.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,

EricWeir wrote:
New to Mac. Not a month yet. In the process of getting set up on my machine somewhere back there it took a picture of me and put it in my entry in the Addressbook. Now when I send mail my address includes the picture.
no it doesn't. that picture is for local display only. it's not sent with your emails. You can edit/change the picture in your address book entry or in system preferences->accounts.
I don't want the picture. I've tried to delete it from the Addressbook without success.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,

Extra monitor w/laptop in office, when out of office how do I prevent Firefox from displaying on the non-existant 2nd screen?

When I am out of my office using my laptop, upon launching Firefox, it displays all of the tabs from the previous session on the non-existent extra monitor which is set up as a screen extention for when I am in my office. All of the other programs that I park on the extra monitor (Outlook for example) display on the laptop's screen when the extra monitor is not attached. Is this a bug? Or, must I not save my open tabs when exiting Firefox if I am going to use the laptop w/o the monitor?

Thanks for your suggestion. I sort of came to that conclusion as I was typing the original question. However if there is anyone out there who has a solution that is not dependent on my remembering to do something before I exit Firefox, it will be welcomed.

Is there a way to prevent photos from displaying larger than resolution allows?

When I display a small photo (e.g. 2"x3") on the iMac, the photo is dispalyed that size. However, on the iPad, the photo is enlarged to the full screen size and it is so pixellated that it is garbage. I have been pasting the small photo into a larger background with Photoshop (since I don't see a way to do it with Photoshop) so it displays the right size, but there must be a better way.

None that I know of. 1024×1024 is the smallest size that will allow the image to be displayed without upsizing on the display.
 Cheers, Tom

How can I prevent firefox from displaying an overall black page after I request a topic search in the google/firefox search box? Not able to see results

I loaded Mozilla v31 on my PC laptop which uses Windows XP operating system with all current updates. When I click on my internet icon, it leads me to the Mozilla page with a Google search bar. Once I type a topic in and click for the search to begin, the Firefox page turns all black and I am not able to see any results or action being taken. I click on the back arrow and enter a new topic, and click on search button, it repeats the same behavior and the Firefox page turns black. Essentially Mozilla Firefox is not a usable browser unless I can fix it. Help!

When this happens, has the address bar changed to a google.com address or is it still blank?
Some graphical glitches are caused by an incompatibility between Firefox and your graphics card drivers. The standard workaround for bypassing this is to disable Firefox from using hardware acceleration. You can make that change here:
"3-bar" menu button (or Tools menu) > Options > Advanced
On the "General" mini-tab, uncheck the box for "Use hardware acceleration when available"
That will take effect the next time you exit Firefox and start it up again.
More generally:
When you have a problem with one particular site, a good "first thing to try" is clearing your Firefox cache and deleting your saved cookies for the site.
(1) Bypass Firefox's Cache
Use Ctrl+Shift+r to reload the page fresh from the server.
Alternately, you also can clear Firefox's cache completely using:
"3-bar" menu button (or Tools menu) > Options > Advanced
On the Network mini-tab > Cached Web Content : "Clear Now"
If you have a large hard drive, this might take a few minutes.
(2) Remove the site's cookies (save any pending work first). While viewing a page on the site, try either:
* right-click and choose View Page Info > Security > "View Cookies"
* (menu bar) Tools > Page Info > Security > "View Cookies"
In the dialog that opens, you can remove the site's cookies individually.
Then try reloading the page. Does that help?

Is there a way to prevent users from editing their sent items in Outlook 2007, 2010, or 2013?

Just as the title states. Any help would be great thanks.

No. If they own the mailbox, they have full access.
If you are looking to preserve messages, look at journaling or retention policies if this is Exchange.
Twitter!:
Please Note: My Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied.

How do i prevent mozilla from displaying "authentification required" for every page? I am running windows xp on a windows server 2003 network

it only happens once when I use the browser for the first time after logging in with the administrator account

I have heard of this situation before, but, like most Apple Mail problems, it is a problem on the recipient's side. There should be no reason that a recipient can't save an inline image from an e-mail message. For years, Apple has bent over backwards to construct messages that PC clients will be able to view. Obviously there are limits as to what they will do.
If you want to follow the standard procedure and hack up your e-mail for the benefit of others who refuse to upgrade, you can try Attachment Tamer. You could also try Microsoft Outlook. This won't change the underlying problem. It will just make it Microsoft's problem to deal with.

Prevent iViews from displaying their own scrollbars

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for