Prevent user from view line item details in KSB1 report

Hi,
how to restricting user from view line item details by double-click on it or highlight an item click on Document?
Regards,
Kelvin

Hi,
This issue got resolved.
SAP suggested to execute the program "FAGL_CORR_0001" for company code wise.
In ECC 5.00 from support pack 10 onwards two new fields has been added to table FAGLFLEXA.  (earlier we are on support pack 9, recently we applied the latest support pack)
If we can execute the above program FAGL_CORR_0001, the two new fields will filled with relevant data and then we can able to use drill down option.
This is for your information.
Message was edited by:
        prasad naga

Similar Messages

  • Is it possible to prevent users from viewing a page in Edit Mode?

    Hello everyone,
    I would like to know if it is possible to prevent users from accessing a portal page in Edit Mode. Currently, the users do not have access to any links that take them to edit mode, but if they add &_mode=16 to the end, they view the page in edit mode. Granted, they don't have permissions to add or edit content, but I would like to keep them from seeing this.
    I am using 9.0.4.1
    Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated!
    Jim

    hi jim,
    you cannot really configure this in portal. if somebody manually appends &_mode=16 we display the default edit mode, but fully enforce security. this means that the user cannot see anything he is not allowed to see: like pending items, hidden, expired or deleted items. as you said he also cannot add, edit or delete any items.
    regards,
    christian

  • CE10 how to prevent user from view hostrical instance

    hi,
    We are currently using CE10. One of our user used search functionality in enterprise to search for reports start with 'employee' and it came  back with all the crystal reports on the server that  started with employees, even the one the user doesn't have access to.  My greatest concern about this is that users can view historical instance and it is sensitive data.  Does anybody know whether or not this is a bug in CE10?  Is there a patch/fix for this?  Is there any configuration change that I can make to
    prevent users from being able search all the reports on the server rather just their own reports?  Any help is greatly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Susan

    hi,
    I have an EVERYONE group with limited access(view object), and EVERYONE group is added to each folder with NO ACCESS.  If I revoke view object(explicitly denied) privilege from EVERYONE group, do I still need to remove EVERYONE group from each folder?  When I'm at folder level in CMC, I see EVERYONE GROUP added, but when I tried to remove the EVERYONE GROUP, the EVERYONE group is not an option for removal.  What am I missing?
    Thanks for your help!
    Regards,
    Susan Johnson

  • Sales Order - Prevent user from creating more that one schedule line

    Hello,
    Is it possible to prevent users from adding lines (rows) in the schedule line tab of VA01/VA02 ? Our requirement is that one item will have one only schedule line, the quantity cannot be split into different dates.
    Regards,
    Joã

    Hi
    There are 2 schedule lines with different dates for a single line item in a sales order because of forward scheduling done by the system
    System does backward scheduling first and if it fails then it does forward scheduling and that is why you find 2 different schedule lines
    In configuration you can restrict the system to do only backward scheduling and stop after that
    I am not infront of SAP now to tell you exactly where is the configuration available
    I think it is  Logistics execution--delivery scheduling
    But This config is definately available in standard system to avoid 2 or more schedule lines for a single line item in a sales order
    But i am not able to understand what is the business logic for such a requirement because i feel it will create a lot of problems
    with this requirement
    Regards
    Raja

  • PO line item details from BAPI_PO_GETDETAIL1 and append to BAPI_PO_CHANGE

    Hi,
    The requirement is to get PO line item details from BAPI_PO_GETDETAIL1 and save it in the internal table and append that internal table into  the BAPI_PO_CHANGE.
    But i am getting dump in this program.
    TABLES: ekpo.
    DATA: BEGIN OF po_details.
            INCLUDE STRUCTURE BAPIMEPOITEM. "Include the structure of Dictionary Reference.
    DATA: END OF po_details.
    DATA: BEGIN OF po_details1.
            INCLUDE STRUCTURE BAPIMEPOITEM. "Include the structure of Dictionary Reference.
    data: END OF po_details1.
    DATA: it_po_details LIKE STANDARD TABLE OF po_details,
    wa_po_details like line of it_po_details.
    data: it_po_details1 like standard table of po_details,
    wa_po_details1 like line of it_po_details1.
    PARAMETERS: p_ebeln LIKE ekpo-ebeln DEFAULT '4500000016'.
    CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_PO_GETDETAIL1'
      EXPORTING
        PURCHASEORDER = p_ebeln
      TABLES
        POITEM        = it_po_details.
    loop at it_po_details into po_details.
      read table it_po_details into wa_po_details with key PO_item = p_ebeln.
      move-corresponding po_details to po_details1.
      CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_PO_CHANGE'
        EXPORTING
          PURCHASEORDER = p_ebeln
        TABLES
          POITEM        = it_po_details.
      append po_details to it_po_details1.
      LOOP AT it_po_details1 INTO wa_po_details1.
        WRITE:/ wa_po_details1-PO_item,
           wa_po_details1-MATERIAL,
           wa_po_details1-SHORT_TEXT,
           wa_po_details1-PLANT.
      ENDLOOP.
    endloop.

    HI,
    1st you check for the following following  authorization objects are checked:                                                                               
    M_BEST_BSA (document type in PO)                                                                               
    M_BEST_EKG (purchasing group in PO)                                                                               
    M_BEST_EKO (purchasing organization in PO)                                                                               
    M_BEST_WRK (plant in PO)          
    and to change the PO below is the eg for changing the short text:-
    TABLES: ekpo.
    DATA: BEGIN OF po_details.
            INCLUDE STRUCTURE bapimepoitem. "Include the structure of Dictionary Reference.
    DATA: END OF po_details.
    DATA: BEGIN OF po_details1.
            INCLUDE STRUCTURE bapimepoitem. "Include the structure of Dictionary Reference.
    DATA: END OF po_details1.
    DATA: it_po_details LIKE STANDARD TABLE OF po_details,
    wa_po_details LIKE LINE OF it_po_details.
    DATA: it_po_details1 LIKE STANDARD TABLE OF po_details,
    wa_po_details1 LIKE LINE OF it_po_details1,
    poheader  LIKE  bapimepoheader,
    return  LIKE STANDARD TABLE OF  bapiret2 WITH HEADER LINE,
    poitemx LIKE STANDARD TABLE OF  bapimepoitemx WITH HEADER LINE.
    PARAMETERS: p_ebeln LIKE ekpo-ebeln DEFAULT '5600010646'.
    CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_PO_GETDETAIL1'
      EXPORTING
        purchaseorder = p_ebeln
      IMPORTING
        poheader      = poheader
      TABLES
        poitem        = it_po_details.
    LOOP AT it_po_details INTO po_details.
      READ TABLE it_po_details INTO wa_po_details INDEX 1.
      MOVE-CORRESPONDING po_details TO po_details1.
      MOVE: po_details-po_item TO poitemx-po_item,
            'X' TO poitemx-short_text.
      APPEND poitemx.
      CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_PO_CHANGE'
        EXPORTING
          purchaseorder = p_ebeln
          poheader      = poheader
        TABLES
          return        = return[]
          poitem        = it_po_details[]
          poitemx     =
          poitemx[].
      CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'.
      APPEND po_details TO it_po_details1.
      LOOP AT it_po_details1 INTO wa_po_details1.
        WRITE:/ wa_po_details1-po_item,
        wa_po_details1-material,
        wa_po_details1-short_text,
        wa_po_details1-plant.
      ENDLOOP.
    ENDLOOP.

  • Create a report same as KSB1 and add WBS line item details from CJI3

    Hello Everyone,
    I need to create a report exactly like KSB1 which should have a selection screen exactly like KSB1 but it should also display the WBS line item details from CJI3.
    What is the right way of doing it? Please advice.
    COEP is pretty huge in Production, and we need to fetch data by a specific date in selection screen or a cost center group. This can take a long time to fetch data from the table based on selection screen input. Are there function modules or do we need to use some other tables to fetch data same as COEP?
    Thanks for all your help.
    Regards,
    Shipra.

    Hai ,
             Please go throuth the note  325546  , u need to implement the customer exit  COOMEP01 .
    regards,
    K.Vinay kumar

  • Report to get Asset Line item details & user id details

    HI All,
    Is there any report to get Asset No, Assets line item details & user Id details.
    Thanks in advance.
    Ava

    Hi,
    which user ID? User created? User last changed?
    You can enhance any standard report with individual fields, see WIKI entry [Include additional fields in Standard Fixed Asset ALV reports|https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPFI/IncludeownfieldsinFI-AAstandardALV] and/or SAP note 335065.
    User who created the asset is field ANLAV-ERNAM.
    Regards,
    Markus

  • Is it possible to prevent users from using the ''Purge'' option from the ''Recover deleted items'' in Office 365?

    Hi,
    After speaking with a Microsoft engineer over the phone, I've been told that there is no way to prevent users to go to their OWA and manually Purge specific items from the ''Recover deleted items''. The Microsoft tech told us to place the desired mailboxes
    on a litigation-hold and that all data will be recoverable... but only from the time you place the mailbox onto Litigation-Hold and previous items, which doesn't take effect for new-coming emails. 
    1- From what I understand, any new items coming in the mailbox after the Litigation-Hold is put in place will still be ''purgeable'', right?
    2- Is there a way (PowerShell, Security group, etc.) that can prevent a user from using the Purge option?
    We are very surprised that there is absolutely no thread that talks about this issue, which in our opinion, is a major legal and security flaw from Office 365. This is a main concern for us to actually go with Office365. For instance, this means that at
    any given time, if a user exchanges emails with a competitor, they can manually purge emails sent and receive as soon as it is sent/received, even after Litigation-Hold is in place.
    Thank you for your reply and let us know if you have more questions.
    Normand Bessette, IT support technician, Newad Media

    Thank you for the reply.
    Is there still a way to prevent users from using the Purge option, like with a Powershell script to disable Purge?

  • Prevent user from update view  object

    Hi all is there is any way to prevent user from update view object at runtime, but if he have a privilege to Update he can update.
    i put all user privilege in a variable in session, but how to use it to prevent user from update .
    or ho w to make updateable view just for create or insert data not update it;
    thnx in advise

    Hi Mohammed,
    > tow view object bad way it means to page (as i think project 50 page mean to create 100 page )??
    Untill the Question is clear Answer will not be clear U never mentioned the Quantum of Pages u gng to work in POST....
    > disable commit button but if user have privilege to insert a new record ??
    Did u think this statement means something.. A user who has no privilege to commit the data wht is the purpose of giving privilege to add the data?????????
    > if i disable table or form and user try to create new record is new fields will be enabled or will be as previous row.
    This too i cant understand?? the user doesnt have access why should he need to create row.. u can disable the Create button too.....
    > by the way is there is any way to catch Sql Statement that will be committed when user press commit .
    While user press commit and u gng to call the ApplicationModule Commit so u can have a hold on doDML() method of the corresponding entity else if u gng to insert though a procedure or function
    U can restrict the same before u calling the same.......
    Regards,
    Suganth.G

  • Reporting line item detail from smartview

    Hi All
    We have several line item detail accounts set-up - can you drill down into this information in smartview?
    Many thanks for any thoughts / suggestions

    Hi,
    According to Smartview documentation, this is possible only if using Planning. Impossible to get line items when working on Financial Management.
    Hope it helps,
    Lionel.

  • Work Order to cost center settlement with line item detail

    Iu2019m having difficulty finding a method to settle from a work order to a cost center with line item detail.  When an order is settled with KO88 or KO8G the total value for that work order/cost element combination is combined and posted to the cost center as a lump sum with the description of CTR\######.  Users would like to see the individual values that posted to the work order in a cost center report such as  KSB1.
    I donu2019t see anything in the settlement rule, settlement profile or allocation structure that will allow line item settlement from work order to cost center.     Is line item settlement possible when settling to a cost center?   Is there an alternate way to see these expenses as line items in KSB1?
    Thanks,
    Jeff

    Thanks Christian,
    We've defined an allocation structure that we use for Project System and Work Order settlement and have Receiver Categories established as FXA, CTR and WBS with "by Cost Element"  checked.  Work order costs do settle to the cost center entered in the settlement rule, the problem is it combines all items values as a single amount when posting to the cost center.
    For example:  
    expenses post to the work order under cost element 500000 for $500, $200, $300 and cost element 600000 for $250 and $250.  The settlement rule says to settle to cost center 170000.  When the settlement takes place cost center 170000 is debited $1000 to cost element 500000 and $500 to cost element 600000.  We would prefer to see individual posting of $500, $200, $300 to 500000  and $250, $250 to 600000.
    Thanks,
    Jeff

  • Customize Line Items Details Loading for Multiload TEXT-Based

    Hi all,
    has anybody customized HFM adapter to enable line item details loading for Text-based multiload files?
    Is it possible?
    Thanks

    But then we wouldn't have one text multiload file but several text files that will be converted into several .dat files to be loaded into HFM.
    Our current problem is that we have a multiload text file (we can convert from the Multiload Excel) but this file contains line item details. We want to keep the performance of loading only one .Dat file, but also load line item details.
    What about if the user split the multiload files into two:
    * Excel Multiload just with Line Item accounts (there are not so much)
    * Text Multiload for standard accounts
    This would be a nice solution as well? If they are happy....
    Thanks

  • Report Painter - Totals are different on face of report & line item details

    Hello,
    We have a report designed in report painter. Thye lIbrary table is GLPCT.
    When we run the report system gives e.g. 100 $ on face of report. However when we double click on that line to get a line item details reoprt the value is different. It is either less or more than the amount diaplayed on initial report.
    Please can you suggest what coule be the probable reason for this anamoly.
    Thaks & Regards
    Shreenath

    Hi Sreenath,
    when you double-click on a line you are jumping to another report.
    The report you are jumping to has either been defined as a linked report by you, or it has been copied from an original SAP-report if you started the creation of your report by copying a standard SAP report.
    The sending report tries to pass on all the selections for the cell you double-click to the line-item report. For standard SAP reports it is guaranteed that this should work and the line item report gives the sames results as the report you are calling it from.
    For self-defined reports, this may not always work. I have had problems especially when calling line-item reports from sum-lines of my self-defined report. The reason was that the selections could not be passed on properly.
    Example:
    line 1: selection on account X and profit center A
    line 2: selection on account Y and profit center B
    line 3: sum of line 1 and line 2
    Now, when I double-click on a cell of line 3 and jump to line items, it passes on the selection idependently, i.e.
    accounts: X, Y
    profit center: A, B
    the line item report now gives me all values for all combinations of accounts X and Y and profit centers A and B.
    It does not take into account the combined selections in my original report.

  • Copying g/l balance and line items details

    What is the best way to copy  account balance and the line item details from one G/L account to another one.
    Thanks

    Hi
    The best way to upload GL open items and GL balance is via FB01.
    Good Luck
    Hari

  • Create a report same as KSB1 and add WBS line item details in the output

    Hello Everyone,
    I need to create a report exactly like KSB1 which should have a selection screen exactly like KSB1 but it should also display the WBS line item details from CJI3.
    What is the right way of doing it? Please advice.
    COEP is pretty huge in Production, and we need to fetch data by a specific date in selection screen or a cost center group. This can take a long time to fetch data from the table based on selection screen input. Are there function modules or do we need to use some other tables to fetch data same as COEP?
    Thanks for all your help.
    Regards,
    Shipra.
    Moderator message - Cross post locked
    Edited by: Rob Burbank on May 28, 2009 10:54 AM

    Hai ,
             Please go throuth the note  325546  , u need to implement the customer exit  COOMEP01 .
    regards,
    K.Vinay kumar

Maybe you are looking for