Price conditions in Shceduling Agreement

Hi All,
I have one query:
How to make the price conditions greyed out in Shceduling Agreement of document type LP?
I even tried out making the price and price unit field display in the field selection but was of no use.
Any help highly appreciated..
Regards,
Abhijit

Hi
Try it out in SPRO- Material amnagement- Purchasing- Scheduling agreement - Define screen layout at document level.
Then select PT0L and change the price into dispaly.
It will work
Regards,
Raman

Similar Messages

Update price condition in scheduling agreement (ME32L)

Hi,
I have to update scheduling agrrement (ME32L).
The input data that i would like to update are price amount, validity start date and valdity end date.
Is there any function or bapi which can be used to update.
Any help in this would be highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Mandeep

hi
did you update the conditions and validity period of scheduling agreement? If yes then plz send me the details of parameters
ITEM_COND_VALIDITY           =
ITEM_COND_VALIDITYX         =
ITEM_CONDITION                  =
ITEM_CONDITIONX                =
I am also facing the same issue.
waiting for your reply.

Price Conditions for Long Term Agreement

Hi,
i need to extract the price conditions from long term agreements. For what i can understand i have to access the KONH table with a Varkey = EBELN&EBELP of the contract, and then see conditions on KONP and KONM tables. One thing I can't understand is how a record in KONH is marked for deletion. If I create another record with same validity period for same item. the other one is superceeded as if it was cancelled. Is there any other table with header condition master data?
Furthermore, why the system lets me insert a new item with gross price, with same condition of an existing one, without having to flag for deletion the other. It seems that i can insert all the gross price (PB00) positions i want, and the last one i inserted is considered.
Someone has any clue?
thanks

Loquat - That's not a good analogy. Let me help you with your bank analogy:
* You pay your mortgage payment on time faithfully for 24.5 years, and you want to REFINANCE your mortgage with your existing bank; however, your existing bank wants to charge you closing costs on your new loan AND a termination fee for the old loan.
* HOWEVER, to solicit new business, your bank is telling other customers that they will pay the termination fees on their old mortgages if they do their refinance with the bank. So why would the bank pay to get someone else's customer but not pay the same (OR EVEN MUCH LESS) to retain the customer that they already have?
* By the way, thanks for the banking analogy. As a 20+ year banker, I can tell you that a bank would never treat new, unproven customers better than their existing, long-time customers.
Thanks all for the lively debate, but nobody has been able to tell me how Verizon is better off by taking $130 now and letting $7,000 go to someone else. That would be the equivalent of a 1.8% discount to make an existing customer feel like Verizon values their business. But they would gladly give $600 ($150 per phone) to a new customer for bringing them the same business.
Loquat - by the way, that is not a "Special Privilege"! That is the same privilege that they are offering to others that are not current customers!! How is that "special privilege"? And yes, it does sound fair.

Valuation Price error in Scheduling Agreement

Hello Experts,
I am getting inflated valuation while doing MIGO for delivery schedule.
It always comes as more than price of material in scheduling agreement and varies from 1.5 times to 4 times.
Example
Material Moving Average price: 3
stock : 0
Purchase price: 3.05
QTY RECEIVED 100
Value of goods at the time of MIGO has 4.27 price
I can give few more data
Pr. Date Cat: 5
Condition type is not group condition
Moving average price changes to 4.27.
This moving average price comes down to 3.05 once I do MIRO. But my , point is, why we getting inflated valuation at the time of GR.
Please let me know if anybody has come across such issue
Thanks and Regards
Gyanesh Kumar Jha

Allen
please check the details
Mater stock zero at the time of creation
mov avg price 1 at the time of creation
val class: 3000, price control V,
scheduling agreement net price: 1.28(1.5 with tax)
mat doc              mat no          mvt    date                qty   unit   value       Sch Agmt       item no
5000002301     409031796     103     15.03.2011     100     EA     0.00             7500000075     1
5000002302     409031796     105     15.03.2011     100     EA     256.41     7500000075     1
Let me know if you can find any details out of this.
Thanks and Regards
Gyanesh Kumar Jha

Price update in Scheduling Agreement

Dear Gurus,
I am seeking valuable suggestions reg the price update in scheduling agreement.
I am aware of the fact the the same can be done in the below mentioned ways-
1) Manually
2) Through condition records
I would be seeking the best possible option to the update the price in scheduling agreements, options would be
1) Manually @ item level
2) Changing condition records ( VK12) with same validity period
3) Changing condition records ( Vk12) with new validity period ( closing the old validity period)
This is because to avoid any inconsistency in the future.
Regards,
Ajit

Dear Ajit,
1.Manual entry -
Manual entry will be applicable in only some cases and you cant able to track if some one has changed the price and it is having limitation .
2.through condition records-
where as if you maintain the price through the access sequence and user cant able to change the price manually and for different combination and different material you can maintain different prices .here there is no limitation and you can extend this price for different combination in future .
Based on the above points you take decision.
Regards,
C.B Reddy

User exit for Price Conditions in VA02 (update,insert or delete conditions)

Hi folks. I would like to know if anyone of you has already worked with transaction VA02...I need a user exit, which could be capable to: Erase, Update and Insert new Price Conditions.
Scenario: The user will not enter into the Price Conditions Tab. He will only make some modifications to the document via VA02 and when he saves the document, then the user exit should update, erase or include new conditions based on some logic that the user exit will implement. does anyone know a user exit for this particular case, please !
Thanks in advance.

HI,
Check this.
V60F0001                                SD Billing plan (customer enhancement) diff. to billing plan
V46H0001                                SD Customer functions for resource-related billing
V45W0001                                SD Service Management: Forward Contract Data to Item
V45S0004                                Effectivity type in sales order
V45S0003                                MRP-relevance for incomplete configuration
V45S0001                                Update sales document from configuration
V45P0001                                SD customer function for cross-company code sales
V45L0001                                SD component supplier processing (customer enhancements)
V45E0002                                Data transfer in procurement elements (PRreq., assembly)
V45E0001                                Update the purchase order from the sales order
V45A0004                                Copy packing proposal
V45A0003                                Collector for customer function modulpool MV45A
V45A0002                                Predefine sold-to party in sales document
V45A0001                                Determine alternative materials for product selection
SDTRM001                                Reschedule schedule lines without a new ATP check
Business Add-in
BADI_SD_SCH_GETWAGFZ                    Scheduling Agreement: Read WAGFZ from S073
BADI_SD_V46H0001                        SD Customer functions for resource-related billing
Regards
Rajendra

Revaluation of Price Condition types

Consulting notes 930870 says about revaluation of price. Does anyone know how to implement the revaluation of pricing?
We have
Cond.Type1
Cond.Type1
Sub-Total XXX
Here Cond.Type1 has multiple condition records thru agreements and we are selecting the winning one through the "Alternate Calculation type - XXX" assigned to the line Sub-Total.
for example.
Cond.Type1 = $20 (determined from Agreement 1)
Cond.Type1 = $30 (determined from Agreement 2)
After executing this komp-Netwr is $30.
Now XXX is getting executed and determines $20 as a winning amount. It leaves Cond.type with agreement 1 as is but changes Cond.type1 with agreement 2 to $0, so that Net value is 20. Thils logic just updates the condition value but doesn't change the Netwr value.
Since the Cond.Type with agreement 2 was processed last, NETWR is 30 and this is not current. I want to run a revaluation so that NETWR = 20.
Does anyone know how to do that.
Thanks in Advance,

Hi,
Check in your pricing procedure if you have VOFM subroutines that happens in pricing (base, formulas,...).
Check to the related Note 900089 - Pricing: Processing steps for FORM XKOMV_BEWERTEN. Perhaps one userexit is working.
I hope this helps you
Regards,
Eduardo

Import conditions in Sheduling Agreement

Dear All,
We use Import schema group in Import vendor master so that whenever we create PO automaticlly the conditions are available in PO for CVD and customs so we can enter relavant rate.
but in case of sheduling agreements for same vendor where we enter such % of CVD and customs.
Pl suggest
Regards,
Vimlesh

Hi Vimlesh
I am facing an similar issue, trying to post planned delivery cost for the Import Schedule agreement ( CVD,Customs,etc..). But even though after maintaining supplementary pricing procedure for the gross price condition and maintaining the delivery cost conditions in Schedule agreement, MIRO is not allowed for posting delivery cost for Schedule agreement.
Experts please help!
Regards
Arvind

Price condition update

Hi Experts,
Any ideas how to update prices in scheduling agreements. There is plenty of them. Too much work to do it manually.
Thanks in advance,

Hi Riyaj,
I got SA docs with many items. For some of them price are blank because in the time of creating documents price conditions were unknown.
Now I have to update them from price list (vk12: condition - ZPR0).
I can do it step by step but it takes ages.

Price increase despite 12months agreed charges

Negotiated prices for package deal (Landline, anytime add-on, broadband etc) for a 12 months period commencing 08/11.
Received quote in writing confirming that prices will last for 12 months. In December 2011 all prices were increased disregarding our agreement. Our demands for a credit for the difference have been refused quoting paragraph 50 of the bt terms & conditions.
How can it be that bt can increase prices despite a firm agreement, in writing, confirming the validity of prices for a 12months period?
In a recent letter bt explained the necessity to increase prices due to market pressures yet at the same time we were able to negotiate even better terms than in August 2011 !?
We have been loyal bt customers for many years and were under the impression that once you negotiate a package they will honour it.
Has anybody else had this experience? Any advice would be appreciated before we take it further.

Thank you, Ectophile, for your comment.
We are satisfied with the service bt offers and would not want to change unless we feel we are being taken for a ride and/or not respected as a loyal customer.
As a Guru, (who should know, I presume) can you explain the absurdity of this situation?:
One negotiates prices , bt comfirms these prices, declares them valid for 12 months, increases prices 4 months later, explains them with market pressures, refuses a refund but offers even better rates than previously.
I would expect, based on this "system", we will get an increase in January, again ignoring our "negotiated prices", our demand for a credit/refund will be refused, quoting paragraph 50, and we will then be offered even better prices the next time round

Price condition equal to VPRS cost of goods

I have a senario ,which we will create sales orders for customers with sales price equals to the MAP(moving average price) at the time when the SO being input .And the sales price in sales orders should be copy to the billing whether the MAP has changed or not .
Now I have set up an pricing procedure ,which use VPRS as the sales price condition type ,but here comes another question when I create billing according to the delivery . When I create the billing document ,the net value is defferent with the net value of the sales order ,because the MAP has changed during the goods issue.
Is there any idea that can make sure the sale price equals to the MAP , and the billing net value is same as sales order net value?
can you give me some advice ? thanks for you help！

Hi,
The pricing type (Copy control) is an extremely important field. It is worthwhile keeping this entry
in mind when creating your pricing condition types. As a rule of thumb, you should
have all item categories for a particular sales document with the same settings.
Generally, you may use pricing type B (carry out new pricing), G (copy pricing
elements unchanged and redetermine taxes), or C (copy manual pricing elements
and redetermine the others).
When using condition B all manual pricing condition types are lost.
If you want to copy the sales order to the invoice without changing the sales order
conditions, use pricing rule G. This will copy the pricing conditions from the order into the
invoice without changing them, but will redetermine the taxes.
Regards...
SBC

How to update multiple Price conditions in FM CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN

Hi All,
      need to update multiple price conditions in a contract Thru FM CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN.
please see the piece of code that am using...
am able to update single price condition...but not able to populate 2 or more .......i,e..ADD A Condition
i,e...DATA : ls_cond TYPE prct_cond_external_input,
       lt_cond TYPE prct_cond_external_input_t.
DATA : ls_con TYPE PRCT_COND_DU,
       lt_con TYPE PRCT_COND_DU_TAB.
Create Condition Type
*ls_con-KNUMV = lv_header_guid.
*ls_con-KPOSN = lv_item_guid.
ls_con-stunr = '134'.
IF Y EQ 1.
ls_con-ZAEHK = '001'.
ELSE.
   ls_con-ZAEHK = '002'.
*ENDIF.
*ls_con-kschl = 'ZFP1'.
**ls_cond-waers = 'CNY'.
*ls_con-kbetr = '0.00'.
*ls_con-kpein = '1'.
ls_cond-kschl = 'ZFP1'.
ls_cond-waers = 'CNY'.
ls_cond-kbetr = '0'.
ls_cond-kpein = '1'.
ls_cond-knumh = lv_item_guid .
CLEAR ls_Price_doc.
ls_Price_doc-ref_guid = lv_item_guid.
ls_Price_doc-ref_kind = 'A'.
IF Y EQ 1.
ls_Price_doc-ref_handle = '000000001'.
ELSE.
ls_Price_doc-ref_handle = '000000002'.
ENDIF.
*ls_price_doc-PRIC_COND[] = lt_cond[].
*INSERT ls_con into table ls_price_doc-PRIC_COND.
INSERT ls_cond into table ls_price_doc-COND_ADD.
INSERT ls_price_doc INTO TABLE lt_price_doc.
ls_input_fields-ref_guid    = lv_item_guid.
ls_input_field_names-fieldname = 'KNUMH'.
INSERT ls_input_fields INTO TABLE lt_input_fields.
ls_input_field_names-fieldname = 'KPOSN'.
INSERT ls_input_fields INTO TABLE lt_input_fields.
ls_input_field_names-fieldname = 'KSCHL'.
INSERT ls_input_fields INTO TABLE lt_input_fields.
ls_input_field_names-fieldname = 'KPEIN'.
INSERT ls_input_fields INTO TABLE lt_input_fields.
ls_input_field_names-fieldname = 'STUNR'.
INSERT ls_input_fields INTO TABLE lt_input_fields.
ls_input_field_names-fieldname = 'ZAEHK'.
INSERT ls_input_fields INTO TABLE lt_input_fields.
ls_input_field_names-fieldname = 'WAERS'.
INSERT ls_input_fields INTO TABLE lt_input_fields.
ls_input_field_names-fieldname = 'KBETR'.
INSERT ls_input_fields INTO TABLE lt_input_fields.
CLEAR ls_input_fields.
Ls_input_fields-ref_guid    = lv_item_guid.
ls_input_fields-ref_kind    = 'B'.
ls_input_fields-objectname = 'PRIDOC'.
*ls_input_fields-logical_key = '0001'.
ls_input_fields-field_names = lt_input_field_names.
INSERT ls_input_fields INTO TABLE lt_input_fields.
CLEAR ls_input_fields.
CLEAR ls_Price_agreement.
Clear ls_cond.
I kept this under code. loop, for item records.....
Though the internal table lt_price_doc. is holding all the records, it is updating only one record. can you any one pls guide me ,

This example works fine for me. Modify it according to your needs...
Price
              IF it_item-value IS NOT INITIAL.
                ls_cond-kschl = 'PR00'. " add price
                ls_cond-kbetr = it_item-value.
                ls_cond-waers = st_head-currency.
                INSERT ls_cond INTO TABLE ls_pridoc_com-cond_add.
                index_2 = 1.
                CLEAR: ls_cond.
              ENDIF.
Discount
              IF it_item-discount IS NOT INITIAL.
                ls_cond-kschl = 'ZPPP'. " add discount
                wa_procent_calc = it_item-discount * 10.
                ls_cond-kbetr = wa_procent_calc."it_item-discount.
                ls_cond-waers = '%'."st_head-currency.
                INSERT ls_cond INTO TABLE ls_pridoc_com-cond_add.
                index_2 = 1.
                CLEAR: ls_cond, wa_procent_calc.
              ENDIF.
              IF index_2 = 1.
                ls_pridoc_com-ref_handle = counter.
                ls_pridoc_com-ref_kind = 'B'.
                INSERT ls_pridoc_com INTO TABLE gt_pridoc_com.
                CLEAR: index_2,ls_pridoc_com.
              ENDIF.

Report to check price condition

Hi All,
Is it possible to check existing price conditions on all customers to make sure we have a valid price (i.e no ZERO price) in any condition, any report or fuction to help me do the above.
Thanks in advance.

Try pricing report V/LD. Copy the output to excel and customer masters to excel and then do a V Lookup in excel.
Regards,
GSL.

Price conditions on Sales Orders via EDI

Hi,
I need to know if there is a way to bring prices over on the IDOC while posting a sales order via EDI. I have a situation where the price does not have to be determined based on condition records setup within SAP but rather update the price sent on the IDOC itself.
Thanks
MR

Hi,
Let the inbound Idoc have the price field and the price of the material. And keep the price condition type open/manual entry allowed. Once this is done the system will not do it from the condition record and will populate the data that is there in the Idoc.
Hope this helps.
Kind Regards
Chakradhar

Price conditions from Info Record to PO

Hi,
While creating PO, Price conditions flow from Purch.info record.
My requirement is => In the Item detail Conditions Tab, the price should not be available for editing (i.e.it should be in display mode) at end user level. If we need to modify the Amount against any condition it should be done only in info record only.
How to address this requirement.
Regards,
Baskar

Hi,
1. Go to SPRO > MM > Purchasing > Authorization Management > Define Function Authorizations for Buyers > Function Authorizations: Purchase Order > Here "New Entries" and define Function Authorization Key as "01" and give description.
OR use T. Code - OMET
Here under "General parameters" subscreen,
Activate "Display conditions" indicator and assign Field selection as "$DE1", do not select "Enter conditions"
In "Possible ref. objects", select "W/o reference" otherwise reference documents (for e.g. PR, RFQ, etc...) for PO creation will become mandatory.
2. Now go to SU01 > Enter User ID > Parameters Tab > Here for Parameter ID EFB i.e. Function Authorization: Purchase Order, maintain value "01" and check in PO field selection will get applied for that user.
Now check in PO, Conditions will become in display mode.

Price conditions in Shceduling Agreement

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for