Price estimation for Enterprise Edition

hello,
i'm working in multimedia agency in Switzerland.
my company is interested in having the Adobe Digital Publishing Suite in Enterprise Edition.
we have 5-6 clients who wants to publish magazine on media tablets,
Could you give me more information about the price & the process.
Or an estimation of the price.
Thanks !

For Switzerland the Adobe Partner handling licensing is:
Switzerland
Topix
Tel: +41 71 313 80 40
[email protected]
www.topix.ch
you can find an entire list http://www.adobe.com/products/digitalpublishingsuite/partners.html
Currently you can only produce content in which your company owns. Adobe has hinted they are working on a "multi-client" Agency model to be released in the near future. Contact the Adobe partner above and they should be able to give you up to date information and a price quote.
Best Regards
David

Similar Messages

Difference between Enterprise Edition and Standard Edition for Oracle RAC

Hi,
In our current setup we have RAC on standard edition and client is now planning to go for Enterprise Edition but not yet decide because of cost.
Is there any difference between Grid Infrastructure 11gR3 Enterprise edition and Standard Edition ?
They told me to first install Enterprise Edition and then will move to Standard Edition if they can't get the EE license so in that case do i have to re-install Grid infrastructure for standard edition?
Regards,
Chirag

994551 wrote:
Hi,
In our current setup we have RAC on standard edition and client is now planning to go for Enterprise Edition but not yet decide because of cost.
Is there any difference between Grid Infrastructure 11gR3 Enterprise edition and Standard Edition ?
They told me to first install Enterprise Edition and then will move to Standard Edition if they can't get the EE license so in that case do i have to re-install Grid infrastructure for standard edition?Hi,
There is no "Grid Infrastructure 11gR3 Enterprise edition and Standard Edition", is only Grid Infrastructure 11gR2.
About Oracle Clusterware (Grid Infrastructure) licensing.
At least one of the servers in the cluster is licensed for Oracle Database (SE1, SE, or EE)
A cluster is defined to include all the machines that share the same Oracle Cluster Registry (OCR) and Voting Disk.
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/license.112/e10594/editions.htm#CJAHFHBJ
About Database licensing.
http://www.oracle.com/us/products/database/enterprise-edition/comparisons/index.html
Note : Oracle Real Application Clusters (Oracle RAC), is an option to Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition and included with Oracle Database 11g Standard Edition (on clusters with a maximum of 4 sockets).
If you move to Oracle EE you must purchase a separate licence to use RAC option
About Installation:
Nothing changes on your current setup of Grid Infrastructure 11.2
Just install a new fresh installation of Oracle Database (On current clusterware) chosing E.E during Install. Configure the database/services to start from this new ORACLE HOME. Nothing change on Database all previous backup and features used still unchanged. Using this new Oracle Home new features are enabled to be used by your databases.
About Downgrade:
Step by Step Procedure to Convert from Enterprise Edition to Standard Edition [ID 465189.1]

Customer Entitlement for Small Publisher - Can't Afford Enterprise Edition

We have an iPad app produced with Adobe DPS but we want to offer the app to our paid print subscribers at no additional charge.
We understand that the Enterprise Edition of DPS offers this functionality. But we're a small nonprofit magazine with a low circulation, and the license fee for Enterprise Edition is a complete nonstarter. We have no need for any of the other Enterprise Edition functionality besides customer entitlement.
Does anyone have any idea of how we could accomplish what we want to do without buying Enterprise Edition?
Tom Baker
Publisher
Commonweal
www.commonwealmagazine.org

If you have a single-folio app with a small set of customers, you might consider sending promo codes to your most loyal customers. Apple allows 50 promo codes for each release of the app. Promo codes work only for apps, not for in-app purchases.

Upgrade BizTalk 2013 Standard Edition to Enterprise edition

Hi All,
I wanted to upgrade from BizTalk 2013 Standard Edition to BizTalk 2013 Enterprise edition. Could you please let me know the steps that I need to follow or the point me to any related documentation.
Thanks and Regards,
Ujjwal
-Ujjwal

Back-up of databases
BizTalk application.
Backup the binding, parties, policies, vocabularies.
BTSNTSVC.config file.
Backup the Enterprise Single Sign-On secret
This would help you if in case of any rollback
When run the installation package for
Enterprise edition, the install will detect
the exiting version and guide you to upgrade. The install will also ensure the
installed BizTalk application is not be affected.
Use the back-ups if anything goes wrong.
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

High Availability Options Without Enterprise Edition

I think I've found the answer to this already but I just wanted to confirm that I'm getting this right. In SQL Server 2012, is there no way to implement a high-availability solution which doesn't require shared storage or use of a deprecated feature without
having Enterprise Edition?
At the moment we have databases hosted on a primary server running Windows Server 2012 Standard and SQL Server 2012 Standard. We have a second, identical server, and the databases are mirrored between the two servers using Database Mirroring.
This works perfectly and meets all of our requirements. The only possible problem is that we're looking at storing documents using FILESTREAM, which isn't available in Mirrored databases.
From what I've read, Database Mirroring is deprecated in SQL Server 2012. High Availability Groups, which sound great, are only available in the Enterprise Edition. This feels like a real kick in the teeth from Microsoft. We're stuck
with either using a deprecated feature (Mirroring), which is only postponing the problem until the end of 2012's life cycle, or laying out significant amounts of money (in the tens of thousands of pounds GBP) to upgrade to Enterprise Edition, which we just
don't have the budget for.
Why couldn't Microsoft continue to offer a high availability option for businesses without deep pockets? Do I have any options I'm not thinking of? Shared storage is not an option (too costly, single point of failure, geographically separated
datacentres).

Thanks for all the feedback.
I was forgetting that even data stored as FILESTREAM would need to be backed up using SQL backups, so I guess that's an issue either way, thank for reminding me, Sebastian.
Geoff, I agree that replication isn't a viable HA solution. FCI has lots going for it, but from what I can make out (and I am just reading up on this now so I could be wrong) requires either shared storage or a third-party tool to move the data from
the Primary server's local storage to the local storage of the Secondaries. It all seems overly complicated when Mirroring does exactly what I need it to do, merrily writing transactions to the mirrors at the same time as the primary databases.
Additionally, whilst you might be right about making the case for Enterprise Edition, it's difficult to make a clear case to non-technical people when we already have a working HA solution and document management. Trying to explain the nuanced advantages
of SQL Server full-text indexing (at present we use a third-party indexing product which stores the index discretely) and simplified querying when the documents are in the same database as their associated data as justification for spending tens of thousands
of pounds is a challenge!
David, that's useful to know, about the disadvantages of using FILESTREAM and how just storing the documents in a VARBINARY(MAX) column might actually give better performance, thank you.

Justifying Oracle Enterprise Edition

Hi Experts,
No offense but this question is not technical and more of a management type question. We have one Standard edition environment in our company and I need to give a justification to upgrade that environment to enterprise.
I am looking for a FORMAL Justification document which justifies the need for enterprise edition. Again I DO NOT WANT the differences between standard and enterprise edition, I know those very well. I need a PROPER detailed document to present in front of my management.
I know that you guys are not aware of my company and company needs but you can think of any mid-level to high-level company. I will really appreciate the response.
Please help me Oracle ACES.

982083 wrote:
Hi Experts,
No offense but this question is not technical and more of a management type question. We have one Standard edition environment in our company and I need to give a justification to upgrade that environment to enterprise.
I am looking for a FORMAL Justification document which justifies the need for enterprise edition. Again I DO NOT WANT the differences between standard and enterprise edition, I know those very well. I need a PROPER detailed document to present in front of my management.
I know that you guys are not aware of my company and company needs but you can think of any mid-level to high-level company. I will really appreciate the response.
Please help me Oracle ACES.Im not an ACE but Ill give it a go if thats ok.
You have a database. you have a business. Take any feature in EE thats not in SE. What is the business impact of implementing the EE feature. Whats the direct cost benefit of the investment.
Take partitioning for example. Are your tables so large that they're impacting business with performance? can you use table union selects and view partitioning to overcome this? Not knowing your business, lets say its order based, is non partitioned tables making a select come out in 5 seconds instead of 2 seconds? can you live with this? whats the financial impact of this? Is it less than the extra SW licence cost with EE? If I was presented with a request for 50k to upgrade to EE, theyre the questions Id ask.
how about RAC or dataguard. if your Db goes down, can the business live with some downtime? Is business impact less than SW cost. could you live with SE standby instead? could you live with SE RAC?
how about performance tools. Could you invest some time into writing scripts, thats what most SE DBAs do.
I'll echo others above. Why do you want to go to EE? why would you be looking to impose the extra cost on your business.
why not write a paper on how you can save the company money by staying on SE by implementing some homebrew tuning? watch as the managers give you thousands in extra salary for saving them money.

Oracle Enterprise Edition Licensing - Core metrics

Oracle: 10G (10.2.0.4) 64-bit, Enterprise Edition
Running on Xeon Intel chips, of which I believe have a core factor multiple of 0.5
We have 540 NUP licenses on our site. We obviously have a Live box, and a few test boxes.
One of our test boxes has 4 cores (Intel Xeon chip). Using the minimum usage licensing for Enterprise Edition, after the core factor of 0.5 is applied we would count 2 cores, I believe we would need 25 NUP licenses per core, which would = 50 NUP minimum for this test box.
Is this correct??
My concern is that there may be a minimum of 4 cores (after factor) for Enterprise Edition. I cannot find anything that confirms this. I can only find maximums for Standard Edition, nothing for Enterprise Edition.
If there is a minimum of 4 cores, then I need to pull out one of these test boxes.
Anyone knows the facts on this?
Many thanks.

Again like everybody said above, you should contact Oracle Sales Rep.
But Still let me answer your question, There is noting like minimum of 4 cores for enterprise edition. You can have NUP license even on 1 CPU.
Another thing which might benefit you that, Oraclel gives you Limited Use Enterprise Licenses for your Test/Dev boxex which means You only need minimum of enterprise 10 NUP's for Test/Dev instead of minimum of 25. This will save you 15 NUP's per processor. But for this you have to talk to Oracle or any third party vendor.
But again best bet is o talk to Sales Rep.

Restoring an Oracle Enterprise Edition DB into XE for use with APEX

Hello, we're just in the process of decomissioning a load of servers and I came across an old Oracle DB box which has an install of APEX (well, HTMLDB) and a backend DB on an Enterprise Edition server, after battling with Oracle for 2 days I finally managed to get it to a state where I think it's restored successfully onto XE but up on the final "startup" I was presented with:
ORA-01092: ORACLE instance terminated. Disconnection forced
ORA-39712: XE edition server cannot open database
I really want\need to get this DB off of this server, because as you all probably know - Oracle DB EE isn't exactly cheap, and seen as though it's used for this historical app I kinda need to get it off of this hardware\software and into a low-end VM for it to chug away happily and be accessed when needs be...
Another option I though of, if I were to do a reinstall of XE, and then data pump the info from the EE to XE? Would that work?
I apologies for any numptiness in this question, but I really haven't got any experience with Oracle - and it's been a learning curve of much frustration coming from my easy to use MSSQL interfaces!
The steps I took were:
1) Run nid to rename the DB from "XE" to "ESTALTST"
a) Do some faffing about with tnsnames and listener.ora to get it to realise ESTALTST
2) Take a backup of logs\db from source
3) Catalog the backups
4) Restore control file
5) A lot of messing about getting the DB happy with the structures of things
6) recover database;
7) alter database resetlogs; <- this is where it said I had to do startup upgrade;
8) shutdown immediate; startup upgrade;
9) Where I am now.
Thanks,
Rich.

Just wondering, if the DB files are about 1Gb, should my dump file be 157Mb?I don't know, that depends on the actual amount of data stored in your database.
The filesize is no reliable measure for this. To give you a simple example: You have a "order entry" schema where you started storing your data 10 years ago. You initialized your data files with just a few megs and let Oracle do the extension automatically, so it grew and grew and is about 1 GB today. Now you decide that you don't need data that is older than two years in that schema and delete all outdated data. After you did that, your data files still be that 1 GB, though you only use about 20 percent of it. Oracle doesn't shrink your data files automatically...
To get a good estimation, you can run something like
SELECT f.file_name,
                        CEIL( f.bytes / 1024 / 1024 ) "SIZE_MB",
                        CEIL( f.bytes / 1024 / 1024 ) - FLOOR( SUM( NVL( fs.bytes, 0 ) ) / 1024 / 1024 ) "USED_MB",
                        FLOOR( SUM( NVL( fs.bytes, 0 ) ) / 1024 / 1024 ) "FREE_MB",
                        CEIL( f.maxbytes / 1024 / 1024 ) "MAX_MB"
                   FROM dba_free_space fs,
                        dba_data_files f
                  WHERE fs.file_id(+)     = f.file_id
               GROUP BY f.file_name,
                        f.bytes,
                        f.maxbytes,
                        f.blocks,
                        f.maxblocks,
                        f.autoextensible
               ORDER BY f.file_name;to see how much space is actually used in your data files. Note that this doesn't necessarily mean that your dump has to have that size. There are a few aspects (like compression) that could cause a difference...
-Udo

Windows Server 2003 R2 Enterprise Edition 32 bits Service Pack 2 never finishes searching for updates and use 100% of CPU.

Hi everyone, I am having issues updating a clean Windows Server 2003 R2 Enterprise Edition 32 bits Service Pack 2, so any help with be appreciated cause I've already tried all my cards for the past 5 days in this particular issue without success.
All I did so far is installing Windows Server 2003 R2 Enterprise with Service Pack 2, open IE to update, it keeps searching for updates and never stop, after 20mn to 30mn the process svchost.exe start using 100% of my CPU.
I already tried the following scenarios:
1- Install IE8, install the update KB927891 and the Windows Update Agent 3.0 (I already had this one installed). Reboot and run windows update trough IE8 and the problem did not solved.
2- Install those 2 software "MicrosoftFixit.wu.MATSKB.Run" and "MicrosoftFixit50777", open IE to update, it still hangs and continues eating my CPU. This is the output of "MicrosoftFixit".
Windows Update error 0x8007000D(2014-01-06-T-06_06_34A) --> Not Fixed
Cryptographic service components are not registered (This service is actually running successfully) --> Not Fixed
3- I found the following script that would register some DLL, deleting the "SoftwareDistribution" and forcing windows update to solve the problem and nothing happened either.
Link to script:
http://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/scriptcenter/Dos-Command-Line-Batch-to-fb07b159#content
Here is a link to the content of my WindowUpdate.log file:
https://skydrive.live.com/redir?resid=883EE9BE85F9632B%21105
Thank you in advance for helping.

All I did so far is installing Windows Server 2003 R2 Enterprise with Service Pack 2, open IE to update, it keeps searching for updates and never stop, after 20mn to 30mn the process svchost.exe start using 100% of my CPU.
Herein is the root cause of your issue. A topic that's been discussed in several blogs, forums, and even in the media since September regards a known issue with attempting to patch IE6 RTM via Windows Update.
Aside from that particular issue... browsing the Internet with an unpatched instance of IE6, especially from a Windows Server system, is also asking for a world of hurt.
Might I suggest the following:
Download the IE8 for Windows Server 2003 installer to a thumb drive.
Download the latest Cumulative Security Update for IE8 for Windows Server 2003 to a thumb drive.
Reinstall Windows Server 2003 with Service Pack 2.
Upgrade to IE8 from the thumb drive installer and apply the
Cumulative Security Update.
Now your machine is capable of safely browsing to Windows Update to install the rest of the updates (well, maybe, there's also all those other Security Updates from the past seven years that your machine still has vulnerabilites for -- even those seven
years of updates are going to take a Very Long Time to scan for, download, and install).
Why don't you have a WSUS server? -- noting, wryly, that you've posted in the *WSUS* forum.
Lawrence Garvin, M.S., MCSA, MCITP:EA, MCDBA
SolarWinds Head Geek
Microsoft MVP - Software Packaging, Deployment & Servicing (2005-2014)
My MVP Profile: http://mvp.microsoft.com/en-us/mvp/Lawrence%20R%20Garvin-32101
http://www.solarwinds.com/gotmicrosoft
The views expressed on this post are mine and do not necessarily reflect the views of SolarWinds.

"In-Memory Database Cache" option for Oracle 10g Enterprise Edition

Hi,
In one of our applications, we are using TimesTen 5.1.24 and Oracle 9i
databases (platform - Solaris 9i).
TimesTen holds application information which needs to be accessed quickly
and Oracle 9i is a master application database.
Now we are looking at an option of migrating from Oracle 9i to Oracle 10g
database. While exploring about Oracle 10g features, came to know about
"In-Memory Database Cache" option for Oracle Enterprise Edition. This made
me to think about using Oracle 10g Enterprise Edition with "In-Memory
Database Cache" option for our application.
Following are the advantages that I could visualize by adopting the
above-mentioned approach:
1. Data reconciliation between Oracle and TimesTen is not required (i.e.
data can be maintained only in Oracle tables and for caching "In-Memory
Database Cache" can be used)
2. Data maintenance is easy and gives one view access to data
I have following queries regarding the above-mentioned solution:
1. What is the difference between "TimesTen In-Memory Database" and
"In-Memory Database Cache" in terms of features and licensing model?
2. Is "In-Memory Database Cache" option integrated with Oracle 10g
installable or a separate installable (i.e. TimesTen installable with only
cache feature)?
3. Is "In-Memory Database Cache" option same as that of "TimesTen Cache
Connect to Oracle" option in TimesTen In-Memory Database?
4. After integrating "In-Memory Database Cache" option with Oracle 10g, data
access will happen only through Oracle sqlplus or OCI calls. Am I right here
in making this statement?
5. Is it possible to cache the result set of a join query in "In-Memory
Database Cache"?
In "Options and Packs" chapter in Oracle documentation
(http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/license.102/b14199/options.htm
#CIHJJBGA), I encountered the following statement:
"For the purposes of licensing Oracle In-Memory Database Cache, only the
processors on which the TimesTen In-Memory Database component of the
In-Memory Database Cache software is installed and/or running are counted
for the purpose of determining the number of licenses required."
We have servers with the following configuration. Is there a way to get the
count of processors on which the Cache software could be installed and/or
running? Please assist.
Production box with 12 core 2 duo processors (24 cores)
Pre-production box with 8 core 2 duo processors (16 cores)
Development and test box with 2 single chip processors
Development and test box with 4 single chip processors
Development and test box with 6 single chip processors
Thanks & Regards,
Vijay

Hi Vijay,
regarding your questions:
1. What is the difference between "TimesTen In-Memory Database" and
"In-Memory Database Cache" in terms of features and licensing model?
==> Product has just been renamed and integrated better with the Oracle database - Times-Ten == In-Memory-Cache-Database
2. Is "In-Memory Database Cache" option integrated with Oracle 10g
installable or a separate installable (i.e. TimesTen installable with only
cache feature)?
==> Seperate Installation
3. Is "In-Memory Database Cache" option same as that of "TimesTen Cache
Connect to Oracle" option in TimesTen In-Memory Database?
==> Please have a look here: http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/timesten/quickstart/cc_qs_index.html
This explains the differences.
4. After integrating "In-Memory Database Cache" option with Oracle 10g, data
access will happen only through Oracle sqlplus or OCI calls. Am I right here
in making this statement?
==> Please see above mentioned papers
5. Is it possible to cache the result set of a join query in "In-Memory
Database Cache"?
==> Again ... ;-)
Kind regards
Mike

Oracle8 Enterprise Edition for Windows 8.0.6

I’m a naïve user in Oracle and would like to know the following details from the Gurus.
Any information in this regard will be highly appreciated !
We are trying to use Oracle8 Enterprise Edition for Windows 8.0.6 for some specific reason.
Some general doubts regarding the installation.
1.     Is any installation specific to the OS language (English/Japanese) ?
2.     Say, if I get an installation for Windows, would I be able to use the same for a Japanese Windows version?
3.     During the installation, choose the default language as Japanese?
Also, if we would need to install Oracle8 Enterprise Edition for Windows 8.0.6 in a Japanese OS, what should we do?
Can we procure a license for the same? Oracle8 Enterprise Edition for Windows 8.0.6
Can we get the media?
Please advice. Many thanks in advance.

The best way to arrange this is to contact Oracle sales and talk very nice to them.
You are asking to have someone provide you with a piece of software that was very full of bugs and made obsolete before year 2000. Oracle will probably not be very happy to do that.
Besides, Oracle is so upward compatible that - unless you depend on the bugs - you should be able to use any currently supported version. Such as Oracle9i or Oracle10g.

Oracle8 Enterprise Edition for Windows 8.0.6 - Info reqd. Pls help !

I’m a naïve user in Oracle and would like to know the following details from the Gurus.
Any information in this regard will be highly appreciated !
We are trying to use Oracle8 Enterprise Edition for Windows 8.0.6 for some specific reason.
Some general doubts regarding the installation.
1. Is any installation specific to the OS language (English/Japanese) ?
2. Say, if I get an installation for Windows, would I be able to use the same for a Japanese Windows version?
3. During the installation, choose the default language as Japanese?
Also, if we would need to install Oracle8 Enterprise Edition for Windows 8.0.6 in a Japanese OS, what should we do?
Can we procure a license for the same? Oracle8 Enterprise Edition for Windows 8.0.6
Can we get the media?
Please advice. Many thanks in advance.

The best way to arrange this is to contact Oracle sales and talk very nice to them.
You are asking to have someone provide you with a piece of software that was very full of bugs and made obsolete before year 2000. Oracle will probably not be very happy to do that.
Besides, Oracle is so upward compatible that - unless you depend on the bugs - you should be able to use any currently supported version. Such as Oracle9i or Oracle10g.

Can't download Oracle 8.1.7 Enterprise Edition for Solaris 32 bit??

I can't download Oracle 8.1.7 Enterprise Edition for Solaris 32 bit. After filling out the form with the questions...I click on the actual link, but the box never pops up. The status bar on my Internet Explorer slowly increases, but never allows me to download. It just hangs. I have tried multiple times, and I can download other verions from your site...and have many times in the past. Could you please fix this. Thanks.

I've looked at it and it seems fine. It might have been a temporary glitch - let us know if you continue to have trouble.
OTN

I would like to make an upgrade from creative suite cs5 to cs6 what is the price for student edition and what i have to do, i do not found in your website price

i would like to make an upgrade from creative suite cs5 to cs6 what is the price for student edition and what i have to do, i do not found in your website price

There are no upgrades for student editions. You simply buy a fresh license at the discounted price.
Mylenium

How can I get oracle 9.2.0.7 Enterprise edition Database for Solaris?

Hi, everybody,
Reccently got involved in a project that require to setup Oracle 9.2.0.7 Enterprise edition Database for Solaris. However from oracle's download page, the only sun platform version for 9i is 9.2.0.1. so to get to 9.2.0.7, do i need to download upgrade patch somewhere? Did anyone go through similar setup before and could you share with me your advice?
thanks in advance!
-liang

Oracle produces media distribution for major releases only, not for patched versions (there has been only a few exceptions). A major release can be determined out from the first three digits, 9.2.0.
Available versions at otn and edelivery are just major versions, the requiered version 9.2.0.X.X is avalable only through patchsets.
By the way only a patchset changes the last two digits, if you require a specific individual patch it doesn't change these last two digits and a specific installation procedure is provided.
Last available patchset for 9iRel2 is 9.2.0.8.0
~ Madrid.

Price estimation for Enterprise Edition

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for