Pricing condition for Taxes in R/3 not being calculated.

We have SRM4.0 in classic mode with R/3 4.6C. In SRM we configured Tax calculation is in R/3. When creating the shopping cart, EBP calls R/3 via RFC for the Tax % and displays the tax information in the cart successfully. The cart is saved and the completed PO is created in R/3. However, our pricing condition for tax, at Pur.Org/Material group in R/3 does not get calculated - so in the item condition screen, no tax is calculated. If i go into the change PO and in Item conditions/Update, (G-Copy Pricing and Redetermine taxes) then it is OK (but this is not ideal). When i do an RFC trace, using RSRFCTRC, i can see my Pur Org, Material Group and Tax code all being passed to R/3. Also, when i do a manual SE37 test on funct.mod. BAPI_PO_CREATE, it does calculate tax correctly - i am stuck - any help appreciated. rgs Adam

Dear Poster,
As no response has been provided to the thread in some time I must assume the issue is resolved, if the question is still valid please create a new thread rephrasing the query and providing as much data as possible to promote response from the community.
Best Regards,
SDN SRM Moderation Team

Similar Messages

  • Conditional for a text input box NOT being null? Sorry for asking so many questions!

    Okay, here's the situation. I'm creating a simulation of a form on which there are several text input boxes, 7 of which are mandatory fields. I know I can use a conditional to check whether the box has nothing in it by creating a null variable with no value and doing "if [box variable] is equal to [null variable] then", but the problem is that the validation captions I need to show need to be shown in order, that is to say that the caption for entering a value for the first box will always be shown if that box is null regardless of the contents of other boxes, the second will be shown if that one is null and the first one isn't etc.
    When I was investigating this I noticed a post by Lilybiri saying that comparison with a null variable doesn't work for "not equal to" so I'm having a hard time figuring out how to show the captions based on priority. For example, to show the second caption I need to not only check whether the second box variable is null, but also whether the first one isn't.
    It gets pretty crazy further along the line where I get to the 7th mandatory field and need to check whether the first, second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth boxes are NOT null and whether the 7th one IS. Help!
    I did come up with one potential solution to this prior to posting: if I set a different advanced action for each input box losing focus which checks whether the variable is null and if so sets a "flag" variable to 0, and in the else set it to 1, I imagine I can then replace the "not equal to" with a check to that flag variable being equal to 1 (which means there is text in the box). I think this will work but I thought I'd check to see if there's an easier way first.

    No it DOESN'T require everything to be on one slide.  It just has to LOOK as if that's what it is.
    I would suggest that it doesn't really matter how many Captivate slides are involved in the final solution, as long as it works the same way (or as close as possible) to the original software that you are simulating.  Your users don't frankly know or care how you achieved the simulation.  I guarantee they won't be thinking of you or Captivate.
    In my experience, you can make creating elearning a lot more difficult than it needs to be in Captivate by trying to rebuild the app, rather than just simulating how it works. For example, thinking that if everything happened on one web page or screen in the app then it must also happen on a single slide in Captivate.  The fact of the matter is IT DOESN'T need to work this way.  And in some cases it might even be impossible to reproduce in Captivate this way.
    So the quickest path to a solution is often to use multiple slides, which has the advantage of allowing you to "fix" certain things on screen (e.g. the contents of fields already visited) by using READ ONLY variable output in transparent captions, focusing only on one element of the interface that the user can interact with on that slide.  It doesn't necessarily prevent you from moving back and forth between elements, just as you can in the original app.  But it is far easier to create and maintain.
    I'm not saying you wouldn't be able to pull this off on one slide in Captivate, but it is going to require a LOT of variables and Advanced Actions to build and debug.  So the term Rapid Elearning becomes something of a misnomer if it takes you a long time to complete one slide.

  • Employer Unemployment Tax Not Being calculated in US Payroll

    Hi Experts,
    Employer Unemployment Tax (Tax Type 10) for Tax Authority Alabama is not being calculated in US Payroll in my SAP system.
    The taxable amt is showing up, but the tax is not being calculated in the payroll log.
    No error/warning mssg is provided by BSI in the payroll log.
    I have already checked for the following:
    1)We are using the standard tax model 002 provided by SAP for Alabama
    The tax model settings are fine.
    2) Table T5UTX is being maintained.
    3) Tax Type 10 is setup against tax auth Alabama in BSI Tax Factory.
    For tax auth Federal too, though the taxable for tax type 10 shows up, tax is not being calculated.
    Can you please help.
    Regards,
    Somdeb.

    Hello Somdeb,
    Please be aware that this is no standard SAP tax model only an example which must be customized as every customer is different.
    First check the payroll log to see if the information is being sent to BSI TaxFactory. If not then the issue is mostly the tax model. Different tax models can be used based on the employee.
    If the values are being sent to BSI and not being calculated, then there is an issue wil BSI. Send BSI the script and they will tell you what the issue is.
    Regards,
    Manny

  • Error :Maintain pricing conditions for the material for the excise invoice

    Hi
    i have maintained excise data for material, after that i have created scheduled agreement with lp and with 0 value private and dummy tax code  and delivery schedule is released. Now when i do the goods receipt i am getting error " Maintain pricing conditions for the material for the excise invoice date
    Message no. 8I629" can some body can help me.
    with regards
    Narendra kumar

    Hi,
    goto tcode fv11 u have to maintained the condition.
    first enter the condition type like jmop -
    then enter, next screen u have the select the below comination.
    select the plant/vendor/material base u have to maintain the conditions.
    Thank's
    MVS

  • How to create a new Condition for tax as VAT ( 4 % )  in SAP ? .

    Dear All ,
                           Pl guide that " How to create a new Condition for tax as VAT ( 4 % )  in SAP ? . What are all necessary requirements to do so , I need to have all steps so that i should feel very confident . For example what data is to be ticked in Control tab during cond. creation , in the same way how to put this cond. in Pricing procedure ? pl write all necessary thing which are required during this process .
    Thanx & deep regrads to all in adv.
    sap11

    In tax we can configure taxprocedure two types i.e., taxinn and tainj. If you adopt taxinn procedure if  it is other than VAT condition first you have to create the condition type and then you have to go to FTXP and assign the tax required VAT percentage to the repective % to ded or non ded VAT condion type. In second step you have to assign this tax code to respective company code.
    If you adopt taxinj procedure you have to a create tax code with FTXP T-code by assigning the values to the respective and save conditions.
    Regards,
    Bhuvan

  • Maintain pricing conditions for the material for the excise invoice date

    When I am doing MIGO (Release GR Blocked Stock-movement type) t)he system is giving an error "Maintain pricing conditions for the material for the excise invoice date"I am attaching screen shot for reference.
    I request if any one can provide me the solution

    Hi,
    Check did you have entry of that movement type in the following path where you specify which movement type relating to goods receipts involve excise invoices
    SPRO -
    > Logistics general -> tax on Goods Movements-> India -> Business Transactions--> Specify Which Movement Types Involve Excise Invoices
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Manual Pricing Condition for sales order!!

    Hi,
    I have an issue, My requirement is I have to add a manual pricing condition in sales order header level. I have define the pricing condition for Freight Charges and that I have added to the pricing procedure that we have used for the transaction.
    The problem is when Iam creating the order in the condition tab manully want to choose the condition type, but what I created condition type (Freight Charges) is not appearing in the view. Only exesting condition types only appearing in tha selection view. I am on CRM Stand alone
    Pls anyone can advise where I miss the setting, I am new in CRM PRICING
    Regards
    VJ

    Hello VJ,
    You must consider that there is a setting "manual" in the pricing procedure customizing, indicating that the condition must be manually entered, and also a setting in condition type  customizing regarding changes that can be made. In condition type customizing you should NOT have option D "Not possible to process manually". Have you checked condition type customizing?
    Additionally please execute function module from note 867428 ( IPC_DET_CLEAR_CUST_BUFFER ).                
    This will ensure that all the customizing changes are immediately available  ( otherwise you would need to wait until the automatic buffer refresh occurs, by default once per day 
    Best Regards
    Luis Rivera

  • Pricing Condition for Serivce Line Item

    Hi Experts,
    I'm trying to create a service PO with 1 Service line item and this service line item actually contains more than 1 service number. Using BAPI_PO_CREATE1, how can I define the pricing condition for each of the service number?
    Currently, I'm able to define the pricing condition of the service item as a whole through this input parameter table POCOND.
    Thanks.
    Best Regards,
    Weishan

    Its really tricky requirement, when you are going for manual condition type.
    - the best alternative to cater your requirement is to go for maintenance of condition record, which you can upload at mass with the help of LSMW. Also, will be really helpful in having report for pricing. Finally, reduce time to create sales order. Thus, discuss & encourage your user to maintain pricing based condition record. Only header condition should be on manual bases.
    - If hard to convince your client on condition record. Then develop a routine with the help of ABAPer in your team. Where you can put logic. If the condition is manual enter and system is able find already entered value for material, then copy the price the slots where system don't find manually entered condition value.
    Regards
    JP

  • One pricing condition for BOM and other for individual component

    Hello SAP gurus,
    We have two pricing condition types created and assigned in the pricing procedure which has been created with reference to PR00 and condition records are maintained for both the condition types.
    But, we want only one pricing condition type to be triggered in the sales order depending on the usage of material in the sales order. As we are selling the same material individually and as well as a component in a bundle ( BOM).
    i.e, when one pricing condition for BOM component and other for individual component
    What are the configuration steps to be taken care to get this scenario?
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    KB
    Edited by: K.byla on Jan 21, 2010 1:20 PM

    Hi Sagar,
    Thanks for your response.
    Yes, we are maintaining only one material. The same material is used to sell individually and also in a BOM.
    As i have mentioned earlier, whenever the material is sold individually it should pick condition type say 'YR00' and when the same material is sold as a bundle ( BOM) , it should pick condition type " YR01" in same the pricing procedure.
    For both the condition types, the condition records are maintained.
    To give the scenario details,
    A material "X" is sold individually as a single component and the same material is also used for selling bundled with other material "Y" and the bundled material as "Z"
    means, Z=X+Y
    Pricing procedure used is say ZRA000 which contains currently the price cond type YR00.
    Now for the bundle (BOM) involvement i want to use the same pricing pricing proc. and add the new cond YR01 in it so that the system will pick the cond.type YR00 when the material is sold individually and YR01 is taken as the price when the material is sold as a bundle against the item X.
    Need to know the steps for this scenario and do i need to maintain a specific requirement ? please suggest.
    BR,
    KB

  • Need a list with pricing conditions for each customer

    Hi experts,
    I am searching for a function module or BAPI which reads out all the pricing conditions for a certain customer. The FM/ BAPI should provide the pricing conditions in an internal table.
    Now I do this with BAPI_SALESORDER_SIMULATE.
    It returns me all the condition types and condition values for a certain customer and material.
    But this BAPI is very slow.
    Can anybody help me to find a better solution?
    Thanks & best regards, Reiner.

    Hi,
    Welcome to SDN.
    If you are using ECC 5 or 6  then
    BAPI_PRICES_CONDITIONS
    a®

  • How to put condition for one date range should not interfear with another ?

    hi friends,
    how to put condition for one date range should not interfear with another  date range.
    my data base table has two fields
    from date
    to date.
    when we enter the date range in the data base , new date range means from date and to date should not interfear.
    can  anybody help me.
    thanks &Regards,
    Revanth
    Edited by: rk.kolisetty on Jul 1, 2010 7:18 PM

    Do it the SAP way....
    First entry...from is today, to is 99991231.
    New dates entered, now we have two rows...:
        from is original date  to becomes yesterday.
        From is today          to is 99991231

  • I have purchased a new mac book pro and I'm trying to install CS6 from old mac. I have installed cs6 upgrade but, software is asking for cs4 number which is not being accepted.

    I have purchased a new mac book pro and I'm trying to install CS6 from old mac. I have installed cs6 upgrade but, software is asking for cs4 number which is not being accepted.

    I should add that it's an HP photosmart 4280.I found it online and it shows the Mac 0SX operating system.

  • I am transmitting data over internet and WiFi ,it's working fine with internet but when I choose WiFi for data transmission data is not being transmitted. What may be the possible issues of data transmission failure over WiFi?  Please help me.

    I am transmitting data over internet and WiFi ,it's working fine with Internet but when I choose WiFi for data transmission data is not being transmitted. What may be the possible issues of data transmission failure over WiFi?     Please help me....
    Thanks in Advance.
    Neeraj@iDev

    After a week's worth of debugging, I found the issue.
    The Java type returned from the call was defined as ArrayList.  Changing it to List resolved the problem.
    I'm not sure why ArrayList isn't a valid return type, I've been looking at the Adobe docs, and still can't see why this isn't valid.  And, why it works in Debug mode and not in Release build is even stranger.  Maybe someone can shed some light on the logic here to me.

  • Mid month period not being calculated in pay slip

    Hi Experts,
    Mid month period given in 0008 is not being calculated. 
         e.g. if i hire some one on 16.01.09, then 0008 data should be calculated for those days only (e.g. 16 days) in pay slip.   But in my case it is taking full amount of 0008. 
    Can any one kindly help, pl.
    thanks
    Balu

    Dear Sikindar,
    thanks for the replay.
    PCL 1 and PCL10 are having 3 and 1 respectively.
    checked  the control record and the pay roll area of that employee and generation of pay roll periods are available in  V_T549Q.
    please guide me further
    thanks
    Balu

  • Dectivate pricing condition for sales order not service order.

    Hi,
    We are on ECC6.0 and CRM5.0
    I need to add new condition type to the existing pricing procedure.It should be activtaed only for service orders and not for sales order.I can achive this by adding new requirement in pricing procedure to limit this condition type based on order type.
    Example:  if KOMK-AUART eq ORDER_TYPE.
                    sy-subrc = 0.
    But I don't want to do this,because I would need to change this requirement everytime I add new service order type.
    Is there any field in Pricing structure KOMK bu using which we can achieve this. ?
    Please suggest any other idea by which I can achieve this
    Thanks
    Dona

    Currently ,we have one pricing procedures for both the scenarios...
    We control if the perticular condition type to be active or not by writing a requirement which checks the order types.
    This has been done this way because we  built the pricing procedure in ECC and tranfer it to CRM.Also we donot have service orders in ECC.
    any further alternatives guys..

Maybe you are looking for